Perfect Masquerade [Game Over]
Forum rules
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Eh, the smileys themselves feel a little overdone and forced, to me no more or less than the offer to tone them down. But I suppose some at the masque feel some attraction in the idea of putting up a different front than usual. Might just be neutral. But it does feel like one extra barrier to get through to read her.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I'm feeling just a littttle regret here. For a moment just now I thought I should have joined this game as Gentleman, you know, I'm in touch with my masculine side. Because if I were I could yolo an invitation to dance with someone? I'll be honest. The usernames we were given are bland, which, fine. There are no votes, no traditional RVS-like stage with, you know, votes. And I'm stuck as a lovely Lady with no concrete game-related, like,offersI can make for people to respond to the way I could do with a vote in a game where everyone has a vote. Like sure I like L9 well enough Town. She seems to have her head in the game. Though to be honest even though their avatars aren't different she and L7 are kind of occupying the same spot in my brain, so. Great. Wonderful. The rest is a mush of people toying with yes admittedly a mostly NAI thing from L5. Oh okay G6 for your last two posts you seem chill as well.
And actually Lady 5, if you're asking, Idofind the cutesy smileys, punctuating nearly your every sentance, irritating. Saccharine. I'm interested to see if you toning it down a bit can help me read you and other people. Offer accepted.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Oh man, you are like the only Gentleman that I'm pretty sureIn post 170, Gentleman 2 wrote:Can we ask people to dance yet. bc like I am keen to do it early and do most of my reading under an assumed masons idea.shouldn'tyolo an invite?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Could have fooled me. I think you might make a fine one. Maybe at an ordinary dance you wouldn't. But tonight you're wearing the mask. Why not go for it?In post 211, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm not a town leader type.
Fair. I probably wouldn't like me either, and I know it, and it's really gnawing at me. Something isn't gelling. I want to be engaging here. Like genuinely I do. But it's not working, apparently. Like it's apparent even to me that I'm trying to say something but I get passed right by, like a ghost. Maybe it's posting while working, here and there, while other people are managing to have actual back-and-forth conversations.In post 217, Lady 9 wrote:I do not like Lady 2.
Like L9, G3, L7, G6 are all sensible. L5 is ... fine. Can stay. L4 ... feels kind of like I do? I mean at the very least I'm sympathetic to her early frustration due to distraction and/or generic names. I'm not sure about her backing down immediately and completely after tbh a mild riposte from G3 early (I'm rereading, because yeah, I need to find some kind of foothold). Like, whatever it is, it's a firmer backing up than necessary but probably NAI. L8, kind of a low-key entrance as well? I'm not really getting much there. I do feel like trending Townread on L5 is a fake unpopular opinion? Like I don't think it was every truly going against the grain?
Mostly I want to know how L4 reads G6.
Oh, G4 also kind of lower bracket. Actually scratch that, I like him taking the offered mantle as Town leader. That's actually quite fine. Same with early offer. Actually even better. I saw the jokey pizza post and was wondering how long that shtick would take to play out. Moving fast on an offer was a strong Town move, like he stepped up to the plate and then actually delivered. Good choice of initial offer, too. L3 was in early but did and said little. G4's offer will offer some focus in a new direction.
I do actually like the broad strokes of the treanding-towards-consensus reads I'm seeing. I actually like all the active gentlemen fairly well, G3, G4, and G6 all Townleaning for me.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I mean, there are a few ladies and gents I'm kind of meh about but not strongly so, including L1, L8. Still skeptical of L4, not sure how much of that is being colored by a strong early Townread on G6.In post 312, Lady 9 wrote:
Okay, that's fair, I noticed that the posts you did have were complaining about Lady 5's use of smilies rather than engaging with the game and that concerns me.In post 244, Lady 2 wrote:Fair. I probably wouldn't like me either, and I know it, and it's really gnawing at me. Something isn't gelling. I want to be engaging here. Like genuinely I do. But it's not working, apparently. Like it's apparent even to me that I'm trying to say something but I get passed right by, like a ghost. Maybe it's posting while working, here and there, while other people are managing to have actual back-and-forth conversations.
In post 244, Lady 2 wrote:Like L9, G3, L7, G6 are all sensible. L5 is ... fine. Can stay. L4 ... feels kind of like I do?
Flipping this around, do you have any scumreads?In post 244, Lady 2 wrote:I do actually like the broad strokes of the treanding-towards-consensus reads I'm seeing. I actually like all the active gentlemen fairly well, G3, G4, and G6 all Townleaning for me.
Wondering if L4 can explain why she might be Townreading me actually? Every other direct mention of me between my last post and this seemed to fit well, if that makes sense (RIP Dannflor btw) but I'm still having trouble developing I guess a mental representation of L4 and her reads, including her maybe read on me.
L1, why are you focusing on predance strat talk instead of the material generated so far? In exchange I'll repeat my Townreads for your convenience: G2, G4, G6, L9, weaker read in that direction on L7. Had G3 down as well but I'm not sure it's really for anything besides him seeming comfortable and casual in tone and response, might just been NAI good vibes going on there.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Yeah I'm consciously tryingIn post 344, Gentleman 6 wrote:Please don't read L4 off of my read on them, I'm not actually sure they're scum anymore.notto let your read (at the time) on L4 color mine too specifically.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
??? thoIn post 362, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Because using imprecise language is bad? If you weren't sure she was scum, don't say you were sure, I don't really see what's hard about this.In post 356, Gentleman 6 wrote:No, I was never 100% sure they were scum. There was a time that I was rather confidently scumreading them. I am no longer sure what my read on them is. Does that post really need to be asked?
Why are you repeatedly going after me forcing me to clarify things that really don't need any sort of clarification?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Okay thanks L4, your thinking is starting to fit and make sense as a cohesive thing.
L7, you want a pseudo-vote, make one yourself. At the very least, if you think that type of vote is a good strategy, tell us which of the ladies you would like to see left out. Otherwise all I'm seeing is setup stuff from you, and it's like busy work. Talking about voting a lady to ditch but not doing it. Talking about basically the same IC-pairing approach that's been most favored. Talking about a pairing strategy L1 has focused most of her energy on. It's not getting much done.
And like hell should G4 retract his invite to L3 (not that I think he can legally?). Talk about muddying waters. L3 is being quite sensible about the invitation, too.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
@Gentleman 7, this was meant to be directed at you, I wrote L7 instead of G7 by mistake.In post 397, Lady 2 wrote:L7, you want a pseudo-vote, make one yourself. At the very least, if you think that type of vote is a good strategy, tell us which of the ladies you would like to see left out. Otherwise all I'm seeing is setup stuff from you, and it's like busy work. Talking about voting a lady to ditch but not doing it. Talking about basically the same IC-pairing approach that's been most favored. Talking about a pairing strategy L1 has focused most of her energy on. It's not getting much done.
And like hell should G4 retract his invite to L3 (not that I think he can legally?). Talk about muddying waters. L3 is being quite sensible about the invitation, too.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Unimpressed with L8 so far and I don't think it's because her strongest stance might be that she doesn't like me/my slot but staying open-minded here.
Interesting. I thought L4 made an interesting point when she responded to me - that it can be beneficial for a scum Lady to Townread many Gentlemen. This is signaling the opposite. G6 is one of the widest and strongest consensus Townreads at this early stage, and seemingly has eyes only for L9, who is another of the strongest consensus Townreads. And plenty of ink has been spilled on the topic of putting together strong T/T pairs for the dance. L8 is signaling that she'll be very choosy about the Gentlemen here, but I guess I'm not sure what that means.In post 430, Lady 8 wrote:The only Gentleman I'd accept at this point is the Doctor aka Gentleman 6. All the other gentlemen have been lack luster, even Gentleman 2, the IC.
I'm very meh about G7's response to me. He spends a lot of time repeating how important making T/T pairs is (which yes, fine). I generally like his Townreads, like, enough, but they're not breaking the mold too much. Hopefully the content he expects to produce later today will help me here.
G1 is great. Particularly feeling good about clearly a thorough and interactive read of the game to this point coming up with no real scumreads. Easy for scum to feel tempted to have reads on both sides of the table, as it were, but I think for various reasons the early game in this setup makes scumreads harder to generate for Town (not least the fact that the scum:Town ratio is on the low side compared to most traditional Mafia games).
Also hoping for more from G5, I don't have a feel for his yet at all.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Okay yeah, yeah, I know, I'm trying to explain what I liked about G1's entrance and this is part of it - it felt like an unforced read of the first ten pages and like he didn't feel compelled to force stronger-seeming conclusions. Like his response to the game as a whole felt like it matched what I've seen of the game as a whole as Town?In post 504, Lady 4 wrote:
It's funny what contrarians so many of us seem to be.In post 502, Lady 2 wrote:Particularly feeling good about clearly a thorough and interactive read of the game to this point coming up with no real scumreads.
+1 mostly mentioning this for noting L7 asking a quite pertinent question that was on my mind while reading but without time to post.In post 520, Lady 7 wrote:Mr not the 6th doctor. Can you talk about why you have such a confident townrwad on l8?
... I really need to go reread G5 I guess? He's one of the few here I still don't have a, like, mental representation of.In post 521, Lady 8 wrote:G5 leaning town for short sharp reads which is something I usually will do as town this early in.
You mean G5 with L2 (me)? That ... well I guess that's an angle I wasn't expecting. Like, all he's said about me is that he doesn't like my slot (as of yesterday). Not sure if he's interested in me. That saidIn post 548, Lady 5 wrote:If both Gent 1 and Lady 8 are town.
They will by far be the power house town needs to win.
The reason Gent 2 should go with Lady 7 is because Lady 7 is feel could be the most possible Deep Wolf so making the confirmed Town partners with them could help in the long run.
As for Gent 5 with Gent 2 I also feel another power house town can be made.
With both their play style’s together it can make with some good late game solving@Gentleman 5, if you see this, how does this suggestion strike you? I did reread you ISO btw, and so little of your thought process is there that I really don't know what to make of it. Like I don't know what you want to do or see happen at this stage of the game, I don't know what information you want from people that would inform your reads and process, I just know that you have some reads that you were willing to state plainly as they came up. Your approach so far isn't really engaging other players in back-and-forth interactions though.
It definitely occurred to me that G1 was one of the few Gentlemen I currently Townread who isn't already showing strong preference for another Lady (or Ladies!) above myself, he was certainly on my mind. I do still like G4/L3 - what's the issue you see there? And honestly I was starting to like the 69 ship idea though I guess I like G6 enough that if he pairs with L8 I would trust him to help everyone read L8 as we go on?In post 551, Gentleman 2 wrote:
Ok so, does anyone have issues with me asking Lady 9?In post 449, Gentleman 2 wrote:I would encourage people to match with people they don't agree with on everything to avoid echo chambers. Just as an FYI.
Also I re-quoted the above because I feel like it is important. I kind of really want G1 and L2 together. I am against the G4/L3. I also feel like L5's deep wolf comment on L7 deserves scrutiny. At this point I would be encouraging L5 to be the Lady left out.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
To whoever or whatever fixed the site, I am nothing but grateful.
Actually feeling good on L4 right now. Her thoughts about which gentlemen might pair well with her and want her sound like she's honestly considering not just what's feasible but what she can work with usefully in the game from an open, uninformed position.
Blah blah blah on G7. I guess what he's doing now is furthering his goal of finding good T/T pairs and feels better than his entrance, which seemed almost ... perfunctory. And like, I do agree with most of his reads.
??? this is enough to say G5 and L5 are opposite alignments? If so, can you show your work, I don't really follow.In post 590, Lady 7 wrote:
Probably makes G5 and L5 unaligned.In post 585, Gentleman 2 wrote:
Interesting take on G5's small body of work.In post 581, Lady 5 wrote:If both Gent 1 and Lady 8 are town.
They will by far be the power house town needs to win.
The reason Gent 2 should go with Lady 7 is because Lady 7 is feel could be the most possible Deep Wolf so making the confirmed Town partners with them could help in the long run.
As for Gent 5 with Gent 2 I also feel another power house town can be made.
With both their play style’s together it can make with some good late game solving
I’ll now be gone for the day.
Cya.
Lol, and here I was thinking you had typed IV until your exchange with L7. F for Gentleman IV, long live Gentleman IV.In post 602, Gentleman 2 wrote:VI
In post 610, Gentleman 2 wrote:I no longer want G6-L7, I now want G6-L2In post 611, Gentleman 6 wrote:What changed?
? Is this saying that you have a strong Townread on me then??? Regardless, G6 is a grand old sport and I'm not nearly so choosy as to deny he's an attractive match, but I honestly would hate to break up the G6/L9 romance and so far G6 hasn't seen me as cute, which takes the wind out of the sails a little.In post 612, Gentleman 2 wrote:My already strong read on you got stronger.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Sensible.In post 623, Gentleman 6 wrote:I guess I'll be honest.
Truth is I'm not entirely sure that she's town and I think that if she is I'll be 100% sure to see it In a hood and if she's not I think I'll see it as well.
Still not following I guess? Yeah G5 hasn't done so much that I would confidently predict him as a likely component of a strong powerful T/T pair late game, it's weird that L5 said basically that ... but I wouldn't go from there to a strong feeling that L5 and G5 cannot have the same alignment?In post 626, Lady 7 wrote:L2:
L5 is talking about G5 pairing with L2 as a town powerhouse, which is from my understanding based off her view of the G5 that was seemingly without realizing what may be of the G5 to come.
Pedit: Yeah that's a hella spicy take (specifically L7/L9 SvS), G6, but if you think that I might as well take a look.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
You're ruling out TvT though?In post 642, Lady 7 wrote:
G5 mainslipped and is getting replaced. I think L5 would be aware of that if she shared a scum at with him.In post 639, Lady 2 wrote:
Sensible.In post 623, Gentleman 6 wrote:I guess I'll be honest.
Truth is I'm not entirely sure that she's town and I think that if she is I'll be 100% sure to see it In a hood and if she's not I think I'll see it as well.
Still not following I guess? Yeah G5 hasn't done so much that I would confidently predict him as a likely component of a strong powerful T/T pair late game, it's weird that L5 said basically that ... but I wouldn't go from there to a strong feeling that L5 and G5 cannot have the same alignment?In post 626, Lady 7 wrote:L2:
L5 is talking about G5 pairing with L2 as a town powerhouse, which is from my understanding based off her view of the G5 that was seemingly without realizing what may be of the G5 to come.
Pedit: Yeah that's a hella spicy take (specifically L7/L9 SvS), G6, but if you think that I might as well take a look.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Okay than I just misunderstood what you meant when you said L5 and G5 were probably "unaligned" (which I read as "this is SvT").
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
same tbhIn post 677, Gentleman 2 wrote:If this was an actual dance, I'd be asking Lady 7.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Walk us through it a bit when you have time?In post 758, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Sort of. G5 was pretty dang towny.In post 627, Lady 4 wrote:G5 being turbotown is definitely a hot take.
In post 762, Gentleman 3 wrote:
But in theory she could have been playing dumb.In post 642, Lady 7 wrote:G5 mainslipped and is getting replaced. I think L5 would be aware of that if she shared a scum at with him.
???In post 764, Gentleman 2 wrote:
My personal rule.In post 759, Gentleman 6 wrote:
I mean.In post 757, Gentleman 2 wrote:But I am possibly the best person to have with scum simply because I don't get to end game, in ANY circumstance, because even with no scum lynches and a NK off me, we still have a misslynch available.
If you are town and paired with town and scum went for, for example, a G6/L9 pairing first, we would want to bring you to endgame.
I don't think there's any sort of rule that says you may not go to endgame.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Sorry, I've been feeling pretty miserable and trouble focusing yesterday and today. Now then.
Eh, but was it content for content's sake, or was there really any there there? It felt low-commitment and maybe low effort. I'm reserving judgment but it didn't feel like valuable content.In post 772, Gentleman 3 wrote:
It's pretty hard to explain, I guess just prioritizing content over appearance? And I don't just mean the four word posts, I mean the focus of his posting stream was very much to push out as much content as he could without really explaining it or trying to make it look good.In post 766, Lady 2 wrote:Walk us through it a bit when you have time?
Gent 7 still feels not great to me as we continue in 975 because ... it's still more focus on non-player-specific content. It feels a lot like "contributing" without contributing, scum can spend time talking about oh should we talk Townreads pre-dance or not, oh well I'm of the opinion that this way is better, you know without advancing anything too specific in terms of reads, moves, etc.
I enjoy conversations in, shall we say, a private and intimate setting.In post 798, Gentleman 6 wrote:Maybe I should just go for the lady who seems most likely to put out after the dance.
I'd be more annoyed with G5 but his reads on the ladies mesh with mine in a way that, I don't know, it makes me feel more comfortable about him I suppose. G6 seems to have the opposite reads to me on G5 and G7. Interesting. I'll keep an open mind. Yeah, even the next post 820 actually seems good from G5. Moving on.
Joke's on you, I'm in fact a very graceful dancer my dear sir. That said I'm still a little baffled that L5 was apparently not only really set on G5/L2 pair as some super strong thing but also seemed surprised when G5 didn't actually ask me just because she said a couple of times "you two could be lategame Town powerhouse, trust me".In post 861, Gentleman 5 wrote:As for why you over L2, I was never intending on dancing with L2, that was a joke post.
Myself, I am open to G6 but under the circumstances I think he has other options that he finds more attractive. G1 and heck, even G7 are gentlemen I can see myself dancing with. G7's posts about not aiming to pir with someone too strongly Townread but still aiming to pair with Town made me rethink him a little ... I don't know, maybe my quibbls with him were just neutral playstyle stuff? It makes me feel better about him. For one thing, it's taking the setup discussion stuff that he's spent so much space on and applying it in a relevant way to himself?
??? no I think it's just technically true that allIn post 908, Lady 8 wrote:
Is this a town-slip? All of dance games have been 1:2 or 2:1 for scum ratios.In post 800, Gentleman 5 wrote:
Again, I think its better not to out town reads until we dance, as we have to factor the pairs.In post 795, Gentleman 7 wrote:
Wait, why is outing townreads a bad idea? I'm of the opinion that we should get a strong towncore--of course, this does depend on our ability to keep scum out. I don't really see the advantage of hiding them?In post 785, Gentleman 5 wrote:Personally, I feel outting townreads are a bad idea until dance time, but thats just me?We can only scumhunt in ladies right now and theres the possibility that all 8 of them could be town.89 ladies could be Town, right? I mean the rules don't say that the randomization gives any regard to player gender, right?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I'd go with L5, L8 and ... L1 maybe? Or maybe G3? That's a little spicy, possibly the technically correct answer would be to leave out the three scummiest gents and force three of hopefully the scummiest ladies to be left without partners? G3, G8 and ... dann, no, I'm honestly willing to keep every other gent for now. Nah, go back to my first suggestion, leave out L5, L8, and either L1 or L6 I suppose. This sets up six ladies with eight gentlemen asking, with my hope to leave G3 and G8 with unrequited invitations.In post 943, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 2, if you could pick three people to be left out right now, who would you choose?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
A throwback to a more refined time. You're a sophisticated lady.In post 946, Lady 7 wrote:I know it’s a pt not qt by the way I just like the way qt sounds better.
also because u r a qt- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Yeah that was a mobile autocorrect for "damn", RIP dann.In post 961, Gentleman 4 wrote:
... something something something some flirtatious remark about you being a qt.In post 946, Lady 7 wrote:I know it’s a pt not qt by the way I just like the way qt sounds better.In post 949, Lady 2 wrote:
Dann isn't here anymore. This comment was supposed to be funny, but I'm not perfectly certain how to convey that through text.In post 943, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 2, if you could pick three people to be left out right now, who would you choose?
What makes you want to leave behind Miss 8?
L8 ... has done a whole lot of nothing? Okay, she's not alone exactly in that regard, maybe L3 is comparable but she's interactive in ways I feel L8 hasn't been. It feels like she's said words but they haven't been words that accomplish stuff. And also looking back her sheeping of G6's reasoning on L5 (L5 being only jokey is something he thinks more likely to come from Town) is kind of icky for me, especially considering the proportion of L8's contributions that had to do with L5's posting style stuff early. I don't know, I see almost no townvibe stuff in her contributions and not even an in to question if more can come of it the way I ha've like with like G7. Like if G6 was still interested in pairing with her I'd be okay with that and maybe we could get a better read from that going forward. But even G6 isn't looking for that anymore and I'm happy for him to pair with L7 or L4 if he wants, there's plenty if utility waiting there.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I'd be open to G6 but he doesn't have eyes for me. I've thought about G1 (needs to start posting again tho) and G7 (though I've questioned whether he's Town quite a bit) as potentially attractive partners.In post 973, Lady 3 wrote:Who are you looking to pair with Lady 2?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
In post 982, Gentleman 4 wrote:In post 971, Lady 2 wrote:In post 961, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 8 has more posts than five of the other players, including yourself, most of which are game related and include reads and stances on players or genuinely add to the game in a productive manner, at least in my opinion. I don't really see where she's sheeping Gentleman 6 on Lady 5 as far as thinking that players making jokes is indicative of town, could you quote that post for me?
I get the impression your read on her is mostly based on your very early impressions, that you began to somewhat skim her posts and now you only have a shadow of a read on her, do you think this is true or false?
This is that post. It's not a strong "sheep" as such, but it's a lame coda to a series of mediocre posts from L8 mainly about L5's posting style. Okay L8 has more posts than me. So what? I don't think they contributed much and I think that they don't contribute much in a way that means scummy. There's a lot of pointless mild interjections, a lot of non-content content like this stuff about G5 "Townslipping" because that's not what it is. If her contributions look good to you, well, fine, I'm not seeing it. I've gone through her ISO. I care about evaluating and understanding this read. Yes at this point I'd say she's in my top three players I'd like to see left out. If one of my Townreads wanted to invite her and read her and work with her it might be a different story. But im not seeing that.In post 125, Lady 8 wrote:In post 122, Lady 9 wrote:
I think that's an oversimplification of the discussion. But anyway, offer something else to talk about if you have a problem with it.In post 120, Lady 8 wrote:Why are we arguing whether smiley faces are AI?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Okay I'm trying to digest the content. L6's entrance is ... it's hard for me not to feel almost indignant about it, like she made three posts prior to yesterday evening and suddenly is loudly proclaiming how valuable her prior contributions were etc. But no, that isn't necessarily scummy. So - fine.
Of the one thing addressed directly to me, G4's 1464 - I think I explained it poorly; L8 engaged around the subject of L5's early tone/posting style stuff in an odd way, see below
Spoiler:
Okay that's a whole stretch of L8's early ISO - L5's joke could seem scummy, L8 doesn'tactuallythink it was scummy but is interested in noting that it could be interpreted that way, agrees in a weirdly qualified way with G6 that apathy about making non-jokey content can be Townie, doesn't think that talking about smiley faces as AI makes sense, agrees outright with G6 that L5's play leans Town. Look, reading it, I don't think that doubling down on this as strongly scummy play from L8 is accurate. Looking back, yeah, I think calling this sheeping G6 is too strong a statement. I think the thing I saw here that bears noticing is that from several posts about L5's posting style and so forth I don't know what L8 actually thought of it. G6 stated simply that he would lean it Town. Only by the point that he said that outright did L8 clearly state her stance (that she felt the same, that it leaned L5 towards Town). I especially don't want to sit around arguing the matter strongly as before; L8 paired with G6, and like I said, I'm fine with that and interested in getting more from G6 about his read on L8 as the game progresses.
I'd probably take G3 if asked but I'd want to do a focused read before accepting unless that was absolutely impossible. I'd prefer G1 or G7 based on their content when they were posting, though I guess realistically I need to downgrade their desirability a little based on recent activity. I had no read on G8 when he posted, like, twice.In post 1471, Gentleman 4 wrote:For reference, remaining Gentleman and Ladies:
have no partners. Of these, only Gentleman 3 has posted in the last day and a half, and only Gentlemen 7 and 3 have posted in the last three days.Gentlemen 1, 3, 7, and 8
have no partners. Of these, all have posted in the last 24 hours, with the exception of Lady 1 who hasn't posted in four days.Ladies 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7
If your name was listed here, I'm really interested to here your thoughts on prospective partners or if you've already explained that, why you've been pushing for said partner (with the exception of Gentleman 3). Gentlemen 3 seems to be a hot commodity for the Ladies, am I wrong?
Trying to read you: probably aggressive qt interaction, that's pretty much the obvious but the more you can keep up the better I would probably feel. It is a useful tool. If I scumread you I am unlikely to just leave the dance to force you out, if that's what you're wondering. You currently are far from a universal Townread. I am not always the most charismatic in getting my scumreads lynched but I think I can present concerns and start a wagon on you if necessary. If you scumread me, that would depend on a few factors, including whether the suspicion is mutual or not, I'd definitely try to figure out where your read was coming from but I would probably just make my case to you about being Town and also why someone I scumread deserves your focus if I was reasonably convinced that your suspicions were sincere from you as Town.In post 1487, Gentleman 3 wrote:I want L2 and L6 to weigh in on this when they get a chance. To both of you, if I pair with you, how will you go about trying to read me? What will you do if you scumread me? What will you do if I scumread you?
G8 asking L7 with almost no content posts is, wow. Just reading it it's like going 0 to 60 in one sentence.
I think I said this but it was this that made me interested in pairing with you:In post 1497, Gentleman 7 wrote:
What do you like about me?In post 977, Lady 2 wrote:
I'd be open to G6 but he doesn't have eyes for me. I've thought about G1 (needs to start posting again tho) and G7 (though I've questioned whether he's Town quite a bit) as potentially attractive partners.In post 973, Lady 3 wrote:Who are you looking to pair with Lady 2?
I don't really remember that much about you, tbh. I'm going to have to look back at you after I catch up to see how I feel.
For some reason I looked at that and thought to myself that hey, I'm not a consensus Townread, and yeah, I don't have anything close to a lock Townread on you, but in that respect I'm kind of what you're looking for - maybe that makes us a potential match. I thought about it and figured I could work with you from this type of angle, anyway.In post 873, Gentleman 7 wrote:
I don't feel like I'm too town read and what we need to win is to create as many strong T/T pairs as possible. If I'm scumread, it will potentially get someone who's well townread to die from being lynched or them leaving. I still want to pair with someone I consider town, to potentially help in solving, bit nit someone whow iso a consensus TR unless I am as well.In post 862, Lady 7 wrote:I retract my earlier wooden feel on g7.
He’s cool.
G7 - why don’t you want to partner with someone too towny?
Catherine, is the amber-haired lady you dislike numbered 8 or 9? - oh, okay, I see you mean 8.
This.In post 1587, Gentleman 4 wrote:I'm almost certain that replace out discussion like this both goes against the spirit of the game (at least in my interpretation of the moderator's posts) as well as the spirit of the site-wide rule pertaining to replacing out. Either way, I'm specifically requesting here that you don't discuss it -- simply take the action you deem necessary and be done with the matter.
I will not engage with L5 while she is talking about finding a replacement behind the scenes. All of her posts regarding this matter are absolutely and clearly in violation ofsite rules, specifically Rule 3 under Mafia Rules.
Also STOPPPPP talking about guessing mains at all. Thanks.
I feel like I need to sit and digest here a little bit. Not really confident in any of my suspicions at the moment. I read a lot of words but I don't feel like I'm seeing the shape of the game as it changed over the last 30-odd pages all that clearly (e.g. who benefited? who didn't?)- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Whoa okay G6 you have quite that strong a read on G5?In post 1824, Gentleman 6 wrote:In post 1823, Gentleman 6 wrote:L4, if I leave the dance (proof that I'm town) can you leave the dance after?
I will prioritize more of my time available for this game to reading that slot I guess.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I'm stepping out for just a but - will you be around in maybe half an hour?In post 1831, Gentleman 4 wrote:I understand; Thank you, Lady 2. Her ISO straight (while I will admit I skimmed at least part of it) doesn't look as solid on her read of Lady 5 as I remembered - I can definitely see where you're coming from now. I'm not really sure how this affects my read on her, but I'll keep it in mind and it does hold weight.
Do you have time to talk about the game with me for a bit?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
See you then!In post 1839, Gentleman 4 wrote:
Yes.In post 1837, Lady 2 wrote:
I'm stepping out for just a but - will you be around in maybe half an hour?In post 1831, Gentleman 4 wrote:I understand; Thank you, Lady 2. Her ISO straight (while I will admit I skimmed at least part of it) doesn't look as solid on her read of Lady 5 as I remembered - I can definitely see where you're coming from now. I'm not really sure how this affects my read on her, but I'll keep it in mind and it does hold weight.
Do you have time to talk about the game with me for a bit?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Sorry I missed those!In post 1906, Gentleman 4 wrote:@Lady 2these were for you from earlier:In post 1333, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 2, I would like to see your analysis of the current matching as well as your reads list, if possible. The more numbers you can attach to things, the more jubilant I become.In post 1334, Gentleman 4 wrote:In addition, how comfortable are you in your scum game? If you could have paired with any of the gentlemen prior to them making the matches they have now, who would you have chosen? If your answer is Gentleman 2, please also include your second choice.
Current matching:
G2-L9 - Good, lean T/T
G4-L3 - Fairly good. I do read G4 Town. I am less confident in L3 but kind of like G6/L8 I don't mind seeing it because I think it will be a +utility pair, like I trust G4 to contribute to reading L3 usefully
G5/L4 - need to reread G5 in full, most of his posting has been in the last day or so and it's a lot and G6 (who I mostly trust) has a strong scumread that I need to evaluate. L4 feels fairly Town so there's that?
G6/L8 - this is a reasonable reason for L8 to be in the game. I approve of G6 not fully discussing his read of her at this juncture
G7/L7 - I'll be honest I was kind of hoping to be asked by G7 but water under the bridge. L7 I still read as Town. This is the only pairing where I'm hoping for the Lady to help read her partner for the game, buuuuut I'll admit I lean Town on G7 at the moment as well. Which is great! It kind of mitigates my disappointment, I hope the two of them do indeed find they dance well together.
Overall the players left without partners right now are:
G1 - Probably one of my better options as a partner at this point. Oddly vocal about Townreading me early. I don't want to get too paranoid about being pocketed, but not many players seem to have strong Townreads on me right now, probably besides him strongest Townread on me is from L4 and I feel like L4 and I have much more direct interaction? I'm open to pairing with him but in some ways I'd feel better about pairing with someone I had a strong Townread on and they were questioning me than the other way around? But that train has sailed, as they say, my strongest Townread gentlemen and even G7, who I was less sure of but interested in have already paired off.
G3 - I actually don't mind his concerns about endgame etc. If anything stuck out to me I think being vocally, openly concerned about pairing to make endgame and coherently explaining his thought process about who he expected to get left out is Townlean. Scum don'twantto appear overly concerned about making endgame, I agree that 1515 feels good.
Perhaps I should update in favor of G3 being a partner I would prefer over G1. Certainly he's been quite active, also an important quality.
G8 - Deliberately (????) low content, low information value, asks L7, a popular and largely Townread Lady out of the blue. Untenable long-term, I don't know what to say. Even if he becomes high content, high value - it could happen, but it's a nagging worry that it's +utility for scum to pair a strong Lady and not give any information pre-dance if they can get away with it without consequences so??
L1 - Needs to post more, not a fan. Appreciate that she gave some reads, at least but between two holders of the slot there's a whole lot of nothing. Seems to be offering content now but in an unfocused way, not really getting anywhere. I don't want this to be a case similar to G8, except instead of no content there's a token effort at content that isn't highly committal.
L5 - Hard for me to parse and I find myself resisting going into it because she's breaking site rules regarding outside influence relating to talking in-thread about potential replacement of her slot.I would go so far as to say that this issue requires Moderator intervention.
L6 - I don't know. She has lots of mostly reasonable words. High volume of scumreads, but they're not terrible? Most of them are decent, though I disagree heavily on L4 scumread. I won't be too disappointed to see her stay.
If I could have paired with any gentleman in the game prior to matches, excluding G2 (actually not sure if I would have been an optimal pairing for G2 but I'd have been open to it if he'd wanted it and the overall utility seemed decent), I would have wanted G6 or you, G4. G6 as a strong Townread and strong player, you basically for similar, though I guess emphasis on my very early Townread on your slot - I guess just because my first thought was in making what I would be most sure of as a T/T pair, including with someone I could see myself working with, someone active and contributing, too.
Right now, the order of my preferences for pairing myself among available gentlemen is G3>G1>>>G8
I ... don't know how comfortable I am in my scumgame. I've had periods of deep lack of confidence in my scumgame and periods of confidence, but I haven't played much Mafia very recently so I don't really know how I'd feel or react drawing scum right now to be honest. I often find playing scum stressful just at baseline.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Like, maybe, but L7 has been one of the most desirable ladies and G7 arguably one of the best remaining gents so I can see why either would find it suitable.In post 2004, Lady 1 wrote:Did anyone else feel like the 7/7 pair came out of left field?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
For accepting G7? Not a worry, I just hope you find him a good dancer!In post 2018, Lady 7 wrote:I’m sorry l2!- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I commit to accepting the next legal invitation I receive so long as it is an invitation in the proposed order.That is, I will accept the first invitation from G3, or the first invitation from G1 provided G3 has already invited a Lady, or the first invitation from G8 provided both G3 and G1 have invited Ladies. I anticipate my activity will allow me to manually accept an appropriate invitation without undue delay. If I forsee a period of absence more than a few hours, I'll set to auto-accept invitations instead.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen byIn post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts thatnotrequesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
No? I was just explaining why I don't need to arrange an auto-accept from the Moderator (which I had been recommended to do) - because I won't be V/LA. It is completely neutral that you will be V/LA; given that you will be, your best option is to declare an auto-accept.In post 2178, Lady 6 wrote:
Excuse me? You think I want to be VLA during this time?In post 2176, Lady 2 wrote:
It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen byIn post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts thatnotrequesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
No kidding, this is a problem. I definitely was hoping L1 and I would get invitations over L5. This is just a straight-up mess.In post 2426, Lady 7 wrote:Oh that's depressing- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I don't actually think that would have been better, honestly.In post 2435, Lady 7 wrote:
Yeah I thought it was a no-brainer.In post 2431, Lady 2 wrote:
No kidding, this is a problem. I definitely was hoping L1 and I would get invitations over L5. This is just a straight-up mess.In post 2426, Lady 7 wrote:Oh that's depressing
Now I feel like I ruined things by not just accepting 8.
I'm sorry.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
You're a strong, high-contribution player widely Townread. He's a gent with almost no contributions to speak of. A G8-L7 pair potentially locks you away in a pairing with no long-term viability even though you I think do have long-term utility in general. Now you didn't accept, sure, but in theory you could have - I guess it's more specifically an invitation for a disruptive pairing and not a disruptive invitation if you frame it that way. Asking L5 is disruptive in the opposite way - it takes a slot not widely Townread, not widely regarded as very readable, regarded by more than one player as moderately compromised in general, and locks it into Dance, forcing out one of two slots regarded as potentially readable (I think?).In post 2447, Lady 7 wrote:Why was asking me a disruptive invitation?
(Also just switched devices and almost logged into my main. ...this does not bode well)
And just the fact that both times he does this without, like, any indication of why he asked who he asked? It's just so hard to see this as not completely calculated.
PEdit: Oh I think this is worse than precancerous, I would say things have definitely invaded through the basement membrane here.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
????In post 2466, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'll just leave at start of dance. Still think G5 is scum. L8 flipping scum makes me think that even more so.
I'm going to do other things, later.
?????
????????- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Look G6 I'll be real, I am reading G5 now
And it's hard because everything I see or don't I worry is subconsciously colored by the fact that I really really don't want you to suicide
But when it comes to G5, the thing that jumps out in his ISO as definitively bad is his read on G3, specifically his push that G3 is "survivalist scum" for what reads as quite a transparent evaluation of the merits of Ladies he could ask and his own position in the game (his assumption that the remaining, very low-activity gentlemen wouldn't be allowed to see late game, so he needed to consider late game viability of his partner, as though he were the last gent to pick). That shade from G5 continued way past the point that I felt G3 had fully clarified his approach, which I straight-up Townread. So. And this:
Yeah, also not a good look on G5 considering his consistent stated Townread on you. And honestly even though much of the game is still opaque to me, those are reason enough to prioritize lynching G5 over letting you carry out your suicide threat. So you have an intent from me, I'm on mobile, there are two votes on G5(/L4) right now?In post 1905, Gentleman 5 wrote:At this point I hope G6 flips scum because hes acting like a hardheaded dick.
(Ate ate ate)
L4: if you plan on suiciding, better make sure they go first.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
You treated it (shaded it?) as scum-motivated behavior though, including G3's evaluations of what the pros of each Lady he could invite? This wasn't just a matter of you telling G3 to get on with it. You basically said that you found the specific manner in which he was not getting on with it scummy.In post 2830, Gentleman 5 wrote:Fair.
I just think given the gamestate, we needed gentlemen to start picking sooner rather than later.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
In post 2832, Lady 2 wrote:
You treated it (shaded it?) as scum-motivated behavior though, including G3's evaluations of what the pros of each Lady he could invite? This wasn't just a matter of you telling G3 to get on with it. You basically said that you found the specific manner in which he was not getting on with it scummy.In post 2830, Gentleman 5 wrote:Fair.
I just think given the gamestate, we needed gentlemen to start picking sooner rather than later.In post 2833, Gentleman 3 wrote:
The disagreement of opinion wasn't the problem. The problem was that you were pushing your own imagined motive for my actions while ignoring me explaining the actual motive.In post 2830, Gentleman 5 wrote:I just think given the gamestate, we needed gentlemen to start picking sooner rather than later.
So you don't think G3 is likely "survivalist scum" at this point? What's your read on him?In post 2834, Gentleman 5 wrote:Which is why I said it’s a fine point. I jumped to conclusions and was too hasty with getting the game going.
I’m still thinking this game more based on the individual than the pairing.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Oh believe me I am definitely perturbed by the G8 situation as a whole.In post 2875, Gentleman 4 wrote:I think players should significantly relax on the Gentleman 5 push right now. At least until I've caught up. No one is made nervous by the fact that Gentleman 8 went out of order to choose Lady 5?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Optimal lynches:In post 2884, Gentleman 4 wrote:Ladies 2, 7, and 5 would you list the pairs in the game in order of most optimal to least optimal lynch, please?
@Lady 2, I do want to say that while I think Gentleman 8's scum flip would somewhat implicate you, I'm individually town reading you and I'd really prefer if that comment didn't prevent you from discussing things with me.
G5/L4 barely ahead of G8/L5. I think both of these are high utility. G5/L4 bumped up in priority due to G6 kind of holding the game hostage to his scumread of G5, which I do mostly see and also I don't want G6 to suicide. I do think that there's a very reasonable chance one of G8/L5 are scum, almost certainly not both, probably G8 a bit more likely. I know and understand your evaluation of G8-scum's potential motivation to step in and ask L5 over me (or L1 but she has flipped) but if he is scum, that's not it because I'm Town. At this point I don't think there's much else for me to say on the subject. It's definitely a loss to the Town rn that L5 is alive and L1 is not.
Least optimal lynch is still quite clearly G2/L9 for obvious reasons.
Every other pair has one potentially high-equity Townread of mine paired with at worst a null/not sure/needs to post more partner, here they are bolding my Townreads:
G4+L3
G6+L8
G7+L7
G3+L6
I'd include my own pairing in that heading as well - I'm Town and I'd like to think I can provide good equity going forward, while I don't have a strong read on G1. G1 claims in PT to be somewhat behind reading and concerned about continued high-volume posting making it hard to stay caught up once he does. Of these pairings I don't have a strong preference for keeping or lynching any of them for the moment. I'm hoping that it's a situation where partners will help sort partners.- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I was going to say basically fine? I think there's enough consensus that G8/L5 can't be allowed to stay in long term regardless, and talking G6 off the ledge is valuableIn post 2887, Gentleman 4 wrote:My follow-up question is rather difficult to phrase, but I'll do my best:
How comfortable do you feel with the game state right now with respect to a Gentleman 5 Lady 4 lynch?
but
L5 continues to insist on nuking everything in her path??? Like L8 saying that L5 needs to go NOW might be correct regardless of G6's attitude towards not lynching G5 now?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
For G8 I think it is within the realm of the possible that he could become an asset, potentially, and that he very sincerely and innocently just didn't engage with anything pre-dance but has the capacity and willingness to contribute significantly now that we've entered the main phases of the game. I cannot completely rule it out, though at this juncture it seems unlikely. L5 is a different matter. I would like to be more charitable than I am, but it's really really hard for me to see L5 as a future asset to Town. It is very very easy to see her as a continual asset for scum even if she's Town. I do think G8 is at least as likely - probably more - tobescum-aligned than L5.
Yes, G5/L4 is (or was, at least) the priority lynch in my eyes, sorry about the typo.
The last question is pretty odd, or maybe I'm just misunderstanding it still? No I don't want Day to end right now I guess? Have I been thinking about things wrong? If we're timely we get two lynches before intermission, correct? I was under the impression that we could lynch G5/L4 and go on to lynch e.g. G8/L5 before intermission phase?- Lady 2
-
Lady 2 Goon
- Lady 2
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 379
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I have a preference for everyone checking in and contributing at least some thoughts before a first lynch. With 7 day deadline for first dance, we have time to discuss a bit before lynching but there's no reason to promote all that much delay either. I'd feel happiest getting both our two pre-dance lynches, preferably on G5/L4 and G8/L5. So if what you're asking is "do you want a speed-wagon" my answer is no, not particularly. - Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2
- Lady 2