Perfect Masquerade [Game Over]
Forum rules
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
The wording here confuses me.In post 24, Lady 5 wrote:
You could Town read everyone if you wish ^_^.In post 19, Lady 9 wrote:Is it bad I already want to town lean Lady 7
That way if someone doesn’t feel Townie they will be the only one who isn’t your Town Read.
Why are you approaching me like this anyway instead of commenting on the read I put forth? I know it's extremely early in the game but that's kind of the point.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
We could come up with memorable nicknames based on avatars. That might be easier than numbering everyone.In post 32, Lady 4 wrote:Hello. I wish we had more memorable names.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Be the change you wish to see!In post 39, Lady 4 wrote:
That would help me a lot. Can we do this?In post 35, Lady 9 wrote:
We could come up with memorable nicknames based on avatars. That might be easier than numbering everyone.In post 32, Lady 4 wrote:Hello. I wish we had more memorable names.
By the way, I was serious about my town read on Lady 7. Just off the first page she immediately comes off as much more carefree and unconcerned about self-image in her tone. Dawn's memey posting seems a lot more forced by comparison. Lady 5/Dawn why did you ignore #30?
Misty can join my early early town leans too.
I think overall her posting has been forced and that post in particular was too concerned with how people view her slot. Townies can read like that sometimes but it's more often a scum trait,In post 51, Gentleman 3 wrote:
What about it? You think it was overly conciliatory?In post 50, Lady 7 wrote:Me. It hit me wrong.especiallyin the early game where establishing yourself can be awkward.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Also, I find this a weird response to a scum read.In post 34, Lady 5 wrote:
<_> Lady 3 rolled Neutral.In post 25, Lady 3 wrote:Lady 5 rolled scum tbh
My read has definitely gotten stronger since then. But I wanted to put something out there early and I find RVS/early-game tone is the best way to generate that.
Do you have any other > rand town reads, Gent 3?- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
It's not strange to lack reads ~3 pages into the game. Do you usually have a lot of reads this early?In post 62, Lady 4 wrote:Not sure if I lack reads because I'm distracted -- having a weird af day today friends -- or because of the nonmemorable names.Gentleman 3 is now Crowman. I can do Dawn and Misty. Is Lady 9's avatar Celeste? Lady 2 can be... Eyes? 7 will just have to be 7, hope no one else is a number.
My avatar is Madeline from Celeste, yes. I don't mind if people want to call me Madeline.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I would think the smiley's would be a pre-decided roleplay quirk regardless of alignment. The potentially AI part was the asking if the quirk bothered anyone.In post 94, Lady 4 wrote:
Maybe not deliberately, but yes, I think small things like that affect people. I also think that avatars play into reads on a subconscious level.In post 89, Lady 7 wrote:
People care about smiley use?In post 75, Lady 4 wrote:I read Dawn's posts while pretending the smileys weren't there and I now like them. Also, this is weak but don't think using them is a quality scum tactic at first glance. It's bound to rub some the wrong way.
The use of smileys isn’t alignment indicative. That wasn’t even part of the critique.
At least one person mentioned it.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
The question isn't directed at me, but I want to point out that it seems to me like Lady 5 is specifically avoiding making non-joke posts. She's ignored my more serious posts twice now. Joking is fine but she doesn't have any non-jokey content yet.In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Can you be more specific? What exactly do you find townie in her posts?In post 103, Lady 4 wrote:The more significant part of 75 was that I think their posts are town aside from this issue anyhow.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think the jokey/blending-in playstyle can be a strategy to get widely town read in itself though.In post 109, Gentleman 6 wrote:I interpret that apathy as townie. I think that scum care a lot more about getting town read than town do right now.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think that's an oversimplification of the discussion. But anyway, offer something else to talk about if you have a problem with it.In post 120, Lady 8 wrote:Why are we arguing whether smiley faces are AI?- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I'd like a mix of both. Widely town read slots should be picky in their choices, choosing other widely town read slots. Ideally, the pairs should be roughly paired according to consensus. But I don't think it's the end of the world if there are some rogue pairs. Mechanically though it would suck to have a universal scum read and universal town read pair up.In post 125, Lady 8 wrote:Should we go for optimal pairings or just wing it?
I don't hate it! I don't think I ascribe the same importance to that tonal slip as you do. But I think how you're approaching your read on her here is townie.In post 127, Lady 4 wrote:@Lady 9 (My nicknames aren't going to stick, are they? I'm getting used to it.)
You may hate this, as you seem like an analytical player, but I buy these as genuinely at ease posts. Specifically, 21 and 24, and now 84 as well. I like 106 too, as the tonal slip speaks of someone who's not overthinking their posts.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
In post 134, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean the key is to make T/T pairings. If flips make a difference in how likely a pairing is to be T/T, then sure, but I'm wary of that because scum have pretty much no incentive to avoid bussing, so associatives will probably not be helpful.
I don't think that's necessarily true? Especially if town manages to play well enough to force an S/S pairing, bussing isn't necessarily an optimal strategy for scum.In post 137, Lady 4 wrote:
The possibility you may be correct about this has me shook.In post 134, Gentleman 3 wrote:I'm wary of that because scum have pretty much no incentive to avoid bussing, so associatives will probably not be helpful.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Despite her overly conciliatory posting earlier, she's going against the grain on the Lady 5 read in a way that reads genuine to me. Also, snark in #68. Maybe my weakest town read so far but still edging there.In post 141, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm confused as to why you townread Lady 4 because I think she's been the only person I outright scumread so far.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
It's so that the other T/T pair that we can hopefully confidently create survives until end game.In post 156, Lady 5 wrote:
Why would we want the confirmed Town to die?In post 152, Lady 8 wrote:We want Gentleman 2 ideally to be the NK bait.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think reads off tone are a more player-specific thing than AI thing. It's the way they arrive at that read that's AI.In post 168, Gentleman 6 wrote:Both claims are essentially unfalsifiable, essentially meaningless, and they're the kind of thing that scum use often when giving townreads to town in the early game because they sound good.
In this case, Lady 4 came into a game state where most people were skeptical about Lady 5, and that kind of going-against-consensus even though the player clearly cares about being conciliatory strikes me a more likely townie read.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
That's a good point, and I agree in a vacuum. I'm not sure I read her posts as "having a random townread" though.In post 178, Gentleman 6 wrote:If anything, I would say that having a random townread on a player who hasn't really done much and who general consensus points to being below average is a scumtell for that player.
I say that even though I also townread that player, but I wouldn't really be able to put a lot of words to it and I certainly wouldn't give those specific words. I'd just say meh I think that they're town.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think that's a misrep of what he's getting at hereIn post 195, Lady 4 wrote:
Did you just complain that I had a read too early, and now I don't have enough reads for you?In post 191, Gentleman 6 wrote:And then their only scumread is Lady 7, who just so happens to be the only other person who called them out earlier in the game.
I don't love Lady 3 either, I just didn't see any reason to mention it.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
It'll happen naturally enough through pairing. I think even if there's an unofficial vote there's probably gonna be some rogue gentleman who will extend a dance invitation to the voted lady.In post 196, Gentleman 2 wrote:Ok so, thoughts on holding a vote for which Lady to kill? An unofficial one.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
That's kinda the part I liked because I thought I could track her process. You think how it was drawn out was forced?In post 200, Gentleman 6 wrote:What I had an issue with was how you presented that read to everyone,you took several posts to do itand never said anything about it.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I do not like Lady 2.
I like Gent 6's thoughts here even if I partly disagree. He's gone against some of the consensus in a much stronger way than Lady 4 and he has specific reasons for his pushes. I feel like he has a less diplomatic/charismatic style in general and is going to garner scum reads just by nature of being grating--no offense meant here. But if you look closer I think he genuinely believes his reasoning, and I don't think it's all bad either. I do wish he wouldn't just drop it just because someone said he was barking up the wrong tree though, I'd rather have this than an echo chamber.
pedit:
is this serious?In post 215, Gentleman 6 wrote:Also, I think that townreading Gentleman 2 just for the IC post is bad play. I don't think it's alignment indicative that they didn't check which player the IC was.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
My strongest town reads are probably Lady 7 and Lady 8.
To a lesser extent I've liked Lady 3, Gentleman 6, and Lady 4.
That's roughly in order. I need more gentleman reads.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Okay, that's fair, I noticed that the posts you did have were complaining about Lady 5's use of smilies rather than engaging with the game and that concerns me.In post 244, Lady 2 wrote:Fair. I probably wouldn't like me either, and I know it, and it's really gnawing at me. Something isn't gelling. I want to be engaging here. Like genuinely I do. But it's not working, apparently. Like it's apparent even to me that I'm trying to say something but I get passed right by, like a ghost. Maybe it's posting while working, here and there, while other people are managing to have actual back-and-forth conversations.
In post 244, Lady 2 wrote:Like L9, G3, L7, G6 are all sensible. L5 is ... fine. Can stay. L4 ... feels kind of like I do?
Flipping this around, do you have any scumreads?In post 244, Lady 2 wrote:I do actually like the broad strokes of the treanding-towards-consensus reads I'm seeing. I actually like all the active gentlemen fairly well, G3, G4, and G6 all Townleaning for me.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Can you elaborate on this, how do you know that they had avatars early?In post 305, Lady 1 wrote:The gents are both keen beans I think, they both had avatars pretty early.
Sure, wouldn't be bad to be able to discuss reads with you eitherIn post 320, Gentleman 6 wrote:I wouldn't bring it up if I wasn't considering asking L9 but I wasn't going to do that if they were getting replaced because I wouldn't know if I thought I was going to get along with the new slot holder.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Am I wrong to be thinking like this?In post 345, Lady 1 wrote:This seems like a nothing question. I mean if you're interested in how to view their profiles sure, but sounded like you were trying to get a read off my method somehow.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Still around, did you want to talk?In post 424, Gentleman 4 wrote:Wheres homegirl Robin at?
Sure, but they seemed to be going out of their way to avoid the more serious posts, which is the real issue here. And they didn't acknowledge 102 either.In post 427, Gentleman 1 wrote:
I may be keeping a serious tone to maintain the roleplay I’m somewhat doing but I see no problem with joking around at this point.In post 102, Lady 9 wrote:
The question isn't directed at me, but I want to point out that it seems to me like Lady 5 is specifically avoiding making non-joke posts. She's ignored my more serious posts twice now. Joking is fine but she doesn't have any non-jokey content yet.In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.
It's certainly possible to play mafia effectively without using meta. It's probably the case that meta doesn't change winrate too drastically due to poor applications.In post 433, Gentleman 1 wrote:Sure but I see two problems, the fact that we essentially need 2 T-T pairings going into Intermission, and the fact that lack of meta reads will likely make this a lot harder to do effectively.
I don't think I cut her off, I think the question was open ended discussion on what we should be doing.In post 442, Gentleman 1 wrote:
How are you so certain Orange (my place holder name for L8) was going to say this? If not why cut her off?In post 158, Lady 9 wrote:
It's so that the other T/T pair that we can hopefully confidently create survives until end game.In post 156, Lady 5 wrote:
Why would we want the confirmed Town to die?In post 152, Lady 8 wrote:We want Gentleman 2 ideally to be the NK bait.
At the time I wrote that I'd have considered them to be active lurking - not really getting into the game, talking about use of smilies, not really offering anything. They've since turned that around, I actually liked their responses that came out after a bit of prodding in 244 and 343.
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
If you feel like you need to pair with Lady 8 go ahead, that's a probable T-T pair.In post 514, Gentleman 6 wrote:Now that Lady 5 has actually started posting game related comments I don't like then overly much, both in terms of I don't agree with their reads and don't understand where they're coming from. For example they said that they like the way Gentleman 3 thinks but I can't find any real solvey posts from them and a lot of following up on tangents so I'm kinda questioning where that comes from.
I'm unsure on G1 so far. I'll try to read it again but their entrance didn't really make too but of an impression on me last night.
I'm very torn on Lady 4. They have posts that ping me town and posts that ping me scum. I'm undecided on them so far.
I think that the majority of G4s shtick is NAI but I'm leaning town on them anyway.
Still think that L8 is very towny, I feel kind of guilty about the fact that they only want to pair with me and I'm torn between them and 9 but those two are my definite townreads among the girls and probably who I'd want to pair with if they weren't, so.
I had one other big townread but MS is awful right now and I don't want to deal with five minute page loads trying to remember who they are, so I'm just not going to bother.
I'm strongly opposed to G2 trying to pair with scum and play town hero
Since you wanted opinions on the rest of your reads:
-As mentioned Lady 5 has been avoiding some serious discussion, I don't feel good about her.
-I'm getting good feelings from Lady 4, I like posts like 431, 495, 500, 501. Maybe I'm just a sucker for the short and to the point way she's saying things.
-Gent 4, I had good feelings here too, though it should be noted that their more recent posts have been light on talking about the game
-Gent 1 strikes me as the type of person who I'd need more information from before being able to determine their alignment, their posting has been straight forward but I don't have a read there- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Well that doesn't seem helpful. I think its definitely better for you to pair with someone we think is town and to get your scumreads killed by voting for them instead, particularly because most everyone seems to be on board with you being townIn post 631, Gentleman 6 wrote:Eh if I'm outing that I might as well out both of my reads.
I think that L7-L9 associatives look extremely likely to be SvS.
I think that L7 independently is the scummiest slot in the game right now.
Given that these are very unpopular reads my goal was to simply let town do what they want for a while and if we don't end up flipping scum to leave the dance with 9 and an explanation why later.
Which means you should pair with lady 8, I guess, if that's your real strongest townread. I'm still open to dancing if that's what you want to do though
That looks good, with that being said, the only pairings with you that would be a problem with me would be Lady 1, Lady 5, and Lady 6. I do think it is important that we set up T-T pairings that we are in agreement onGentleman 2 wrote:Yeah I might ask L4. Pending input from L9.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I'm still left unsure on a lot of the gents, while I feel like I have better reads on the ladies. I'm not quite sure what to think of Gent 5, Gent 4, or Gent 3. Gent 6 I'm ready to say is town with decent confidence.In post 685, Gentleman 2 wrote:I am more ok with you matching with L9 now though.
Gent 7 has made little impression on me although they've posted. I kind of liked them posting their theory in post 572, it seems town are more likely to look and talk about loopholes using game mechanics than mafia. That being said, I don't think that is a good idea, as has been pointed out.
Gent 8 has only posted in a jokey way so far.
Gent 1, I'm leaning town here, I don't agree with whoever said that they were posting just to. I do want to hear what their small concerns with me are- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Yeah we can dance if you want, let me know if you want me to accept this for real and i will. Only reservation here is knowing that I'm set to die if dancing with you, but if we can set up a few pairings that I feel good about then there isn't a problem, and maybe people will be more inclined to follow through with them that wayIn post 705, Gentleman 2 wrote:Lady 9, may I have this dance?
I will not hold it against you if you decline.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
In post 705, Gentleman 2 wrote:Lady 9, may I have this dance?
I will not hold it against you if you decline.I accept
On second thought I don't think think there is a reason to delay this, and I know gent 6 is looking at me funny now, so *shrug*- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I do, but I see that paranoia is starting to blossom. I'm thinking my biggest contribution to this game now would be to set up T-T pairings and then die. I'm at a point in the game where I'm able to pick and choose with Ladies I'd like to see live to the end. I'm going to be focusing on Gents now.In post 776, Gentleman 3 wrote:You don't want to try and live to endgame?
Can you explain why you don't think L5/G5 are scum? I'm not sure that you've talked about this beforeIn post 773, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean, yeah, that's absolutely something scum might do to try to avoid giving away inside knowledge. I don't think L5 or G5 are scum but I don't think this specifically rules them out.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
There are 9 ladies.In post 800, Gentleman 5 wrote:We can only scumhunt in ladies right now and theres the possibility that all 8 of them could be town.
Hey, I agree with you. I'd like for either lady 1 or lady 5 to be left out.In post 803, Gentleman 6 wrote:I don't. 1 and 6 are either going to start posting or get replaced. 5's posting gives me a headache and I think they're above average scum equity.
If they pair together then they both die at the same timeIn post 810, Gentleman 5 wrote:
Deal.In post 809, Gentleman 6 wrote:The way you're defending her makes me want her dead more and you next if she's scum.
Hi. I know you're paranoid but we are on the same page, compare your reads to mine here:In post 819, Gentleman 6 wrote:2 got paired up with 9 whom I am not sure is town
1 I am leaning but not concrete that they are town.
3 is up in the air.
4 I think is town but want to see more from the replacement.
5 I'm not liking.
6 is town!
7 I think is town.
8 I don't remember.
Spoiler:
Right now that's you though, is this a lack of awareness on your part or are you committing to posting more?In post 824, Lady 6 wrote:I'll answer the last in a bit but the lady who should sit is the one who doesn't talk, says nothing when they do or talks so much that it blocks effective communication. That is the standard I will apply.
Lady 8 or Lady 7, or to a lesser extent Lady 2, Lady 4, or Lady 3. Or Lady 6, I kind of like her already.In post 825, Gentleman 6 wrote:Who should I be dancing with? :V- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I'd like for us to manage pairings as they happen to create T-T pairs, which is an effective way of winning in this setup, IMO. That necessitates that you get reads on everybody before predance is overIn post 827, Gentleman 2 wrote:Alright, I feel better now.
So, who wants to talk shop by the punch bowl?- Lady 9
-
Lady 9
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Hmm, I remember liking Misty's early posts, and she had more content than a lot of people at the timeIn post 844, Lady 4 wrote:
What's right with 3? For real, please tell me why everyone likes her, I don't get it.In post 842, Lady 9 wrote:What's wrong with lady 3 and lady 7?
7 has had a few posts that made me think she might be town, but a lot more neutral unmemorable ones. I don't trust her.
If the only posts from 7 are neutral or towny, shouldn't you want them to get a dance partner? It doesn't sound like you scumread her
Hold on, are you leaving people out based on whether they will try, or whether you think they will flip scum? You're changing your method between posts hereIn post 845, Lady 4 wrote:I haven't formed a strong opinion of you yet, but as you probably already have more posts than L1, it seems like you will at least try.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Forgot about this for a minute. I'll answer this by saying I didn't accept early (I didn't even accept the first offer I got), Gent 2 had been talking about it for a while, and finally made the decision to ask me. I'm counting on Gent 2 to lead the pairing discussion, as the IC, so when they say wait I wait, and when they say go I go.In post 795, Gentleman 7 wrote:Also, L9, why did you accept so early?- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Usually the latter half of the day, I'm here nowIn post 854, Gentleman 2 wrote:My Lady, when are you normally around?
What do you mean "after what happened with G2"?In post 860, Gentleman 7 wrote:I'd argue that this is even more important than partnering with someone you think would mesh well, after what happened to G2.
People have been talking about this. Let's try to get two more T-T pairs together, who do you feel the best about?
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Is there a reason you waited until after I was paired with gent 2 to bring this up? Because he tossed the idea around for quite a while and it feels like you didn't say anythingIn post 1062, Gentleman 3 wrote:
I don't think L9 has ever been towny. Not much to explain.In post 1061, Gentleman 5 wrote:Ooooooooh Explain this one!
There are still quite a few people who haven't posted substantiallyIn post 1091, Gentleman 5 wrote:You know, for 44 pages in, there seems to be alot of uncertainty for reads.
I mean, theres a reason/excuse I, G2, and maybe one or two other have, but the rest of yall idk what to think.
I do like your posting ever since it picked up
I'm happy about it, in the sense that I've got the both of you as probably town, with room for doubtIn post 1109, Lady 4 wrote:Interesting.
I am leaning towards taking that. You've towned a little and I dislike most of my options.
I want to think about it for a little while first though.
Oh, why do you think Lady 4 is scum?In post 1128, Lady 6 wrote:
*sobs*In post 1105, Gentleman 5 wrote:This wont work, but lets try it because Im bored.
Lady 4, care to dance?
P-edit: we dont know that, i doubt that the above works.
You ask scum before me?- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think you are reading too much into it, I just happened to not be on yesterdayIn post 1138, Lady 3 wrote:Maybe I'm reading too much into it but L9's thread presence disappearing after pairing up with IC is v townie.
Personally, I feel like there isn't a need to try to read me unless our pairing survives the nightkill, and it may even be counter-productive (giving scum ideas, etc)
I see that you change this later, I disagree and think they are fine, and being argumentative with people is a town traitIn post 1143, Gentleman 6 wrote:Everything that 6 posts feels like scumposting.
I noticed that they replaced outIn post 1205, Gentleman 5 wrote:L9, G2 was replaced out. We now have a new G2 that isnt as effective as the original- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Do you townread lady 8?In post 1214, Gentleman 6 wrote:I mean, I could always just ask someone else whose present. I'm just a little put out about this whole asking phase.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I thought I made it clear previously that I was hoping for the IC to lead or at least help lead discussion on pairings?In post 1312, Lady 7 wrote:
Oh well it looks like I might not make it past predance, so might as well out some of my thoughts.In post 849, Lady 9 wrote:
Forgot about this for a minute. I'll answer this by saying I didn't accept early (I didn't even accept the first offer I got), Gent 2 had been talking about it for a while, and finally made the decision to ask me. I'm counting on Gent 2 to lead the pairing discussion, as the IC, so when they say wait I wait, and when they say go I go.In post 795, Gentleman 7 wrote:Also, L9, why did you accept so early?
While L9 is probably right that we shouldn't worry about reading her until after intermission, I just wanted to point out that this post feels off especially with the tone of her posts thus far. Maybe means nothing, but feels like super catering to the IC. The IC really isn't much of anything except confirmed town. It doesn't make you better at reading people; it doesn't make you anything special except confirmed town. You know they're town and you know (hope) they aren't lying about their reads.
Lady 9 seemed like she had a mind of her own. I don't agree with G5? that doing stuff in the early game to progress the game is overly townie because that's like the most superficial reason to become townie ever. It's really not that alignment indicative because scum know that's how hey can look good and many scum try to make sure they look good early game, so that's a weak point.
So L9 looks like she has a big mind of her own and that's pretty much why G2 chose her, so why does she all of the sudden when paired with the IC be like when he says jump I jump type behavior? Feels like pandering. He's not infallible or special he's just town.
I still like her, 1250 I don't agree with, but I don't scumread her from bringing it up.Gentleman 6 wrote:L9! What do you think about L6?
If you were serious about 1264 then that would change my opinion, but it seems like you aren't- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Yeah, alright. I don't have the energy to respond to every post within 60 pages, I'll skim through and give my impressions. This will happen later today. I noticed we're in dance stage, I'll talk about who I want lynched tooIn post 2746, Gentleman 6 wrote:L9 you really need to be doing more than you're doing. The game hasn't coped well with your absence.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Very good points here.In post 3261, Gentleman 6 wrote:As an example, in the early game, they called Celeste leanscum because of "small concerns" with no reason given.
They recently changed that to leantown because of Celeste's "effort" even though she's literally been an absentee slot for the vast majority of the game outside of D1.
They noncommittally give milquetoast takes and ask questions that they never really follow up on when they actually are posting alignment indicative content.
Gent 1, why did your read on me change?
Gent 6, where are you focusing for the first lynch, gent 1 or gent 5?
I think Lady 5 is playing too weird to actually be scum this game. Gent 8 hasn't done anything, his proposals were pretty bad though. I'm in agreement that Gent 8 needs to go before the final 3-4 or so pairings, as he isn't doing anything to make himself readableIn post 3263, Gentleman 5 wrote:
I kinda agree with the posts above.G1 - So I really havent had time to personally witness him in action so I have to go by rereading. I really do not like his way of nicknames, as it makes going back kinda a pain if you dont know the person. I feel like most of his questioning didnt really go anywhere, and that he didnt follow through on any of it. #1658 seems like the only post worth its weight, the rest looks like just asking questions and nicknames. Meh slot.
But the con is that L5 lives awhile longer.
Gent 6, I'm halfway on Gent 3/Lady 6, I townread Lady 6 but don't have a read on Gent 3 (even after I look at his iso, I can't seem to get a good feel for him), can you explain why he is town?- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Not surprised. We should focus on who is town today, we can probably win with 1 t-t pair. I like 3-6 right now. And my pair, naturally.
Now that we're down to 5 pairs left I'm hard eyeing pair 7-7 and thinking it's not likely for this pair to be 2 town (with the knowledge that I'm town)
In the sense that only 1 other pair can be t-t- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I mentioned your pair because I thought it was T-T yesterday but now with so many town flips I've changed my mind, plus determining between your pair and gent 3/lady 6 is pretty important. I think there is a sort of consensus agreement that lady 5/gent 8 and lady 2/gent 1 are both getting lynched today, which leaves your pair, Gent 3/Lady 6, and my pair. And I don't know what Gent 2 is thinking right nowIn post 3848, Lady 7 wrote:Why isn’t l9 scum? Come on people, her approach to the game is so scum motivated it’s ridiculous. Starts off strong with some analytical posts early day one and then floats on the laurels of early town reads for the rest of the game. How is this town? How is this above suspicion? I also don’t like her post today, mostly in the part where she feels the need to include her being young oerslective. It’s like no shit, you don’t need to qualify that but sometimes scum do. Also if g1 is scum, she poo-pooed my earlier read on g1 for posting to post. Look at her beginning of first dance hop onto g5, which seemed to be sleeping g6 predance rather than any kind of assessment of her own.
So what is town about her? I don’t see it. Also if there are five pairs left and she confidently likes l6/g3, what that Piet should have said is she’s willing to tear through the last three pairs because they contain all the pairs. So why specifically say your taking a hard eye in 7-7. Kinda makes me think we’re actually a town town pair she needs to get rid of.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Not thatIn post 3855, Lady 5 wrote:If your in my position and you want to win and not lose to mafia.
What would you do?
I canIn post 3861, Lady 6 wrote:
Can you vote G8? Save the mod the hassle?In post 3851, Lady 7 wrote:I am also willing to move to G8, the longer this crap goes on the longer I can't believe he might be town somehow.
VOTE: Lady 5/Gent 8- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I think that this a strange opinion to have.In post 3871, Gentleman 1 wrote:I also see L5 just straight up lost her mind. I might be having a confirmation bias situation but that meltdown really feels like it comes from scum with how indignant it seems. It feels like such a selfish reaction to not having G8 around. I feel like town would be upset there was an empty slot at all, but L5 made it all about her.- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I'm a little confused, what is the problem with lady 5/gent 8 going first, if your pair goes next? And why does the order matter?In post 3929, Lady 2 wrote:L5, please do not leave dance, especially not before G8's replacement takes over the slot and says something. I'm really not comfortable with the way your pair is being pushed right now as the lynch that needs to happen first and I DO NOT want your pair to be the first pair out a) without you and G8 having time to give input that might make you readable and b) without enough people having to commit a vote to actually lynch your pair.
By poe, it's pretty likely that Gent 8 is scum, him replacing in and starting to play the game doesn't really show that, and it's hard looking at what he's saying right now without thinking that he could have been coached or whatnot extensively before posting this stuff. Basically what I'm saying is, though fascinating, I think we still need to lynch them this game.
As a reminder, we do have a deadline, and I believe we lose when that hits 0- Lady 9
-
Lady 9 Goon
- Lady 9
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: October 29, 2019
It's a lot clearer than G8 is scum from my point of view, where I know I'm town, than it would be for you guys. For the coaching thing, his partners could have been telling him what to say when he came back (the old G8) and the new G8 could have picked that up right away upon coming in.
If the scum isn't in l5/g8, but also isn't me, what does the scumteam look like? - Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9
- Lady 9