This is my move and I don't like that you've stolen it from me.
VOTE: vork
This is my move and I don't like that you've stolen it from me.
Maybe partially? But they were town.In post 40, UltimatePlank wrote:Were they right?In post 36, Elements wrote:Similar vibes from my previous games with them
EBWOPIn post 84, Elements wrote:yo wimpy, why you so angsty? Take a chill pill my dude.
VOTE: Elements
It's not counter win condition to vote yourself at this stage. There are no wagons, there's no possibility to be lynched from it. It generated discussion which is pro town. I think you should vote yourself. It's very liberating.
<3
yesIn post 100, Wimpy wrote:so nobody is going to actually answer my question?
answered your question, so does that mean I lied?!In post 101, Elements wrote:yesIn post 100, Wimpy wrote:so nobody is going to actually answer my question?
What was your question?In post 100, Wimpy wrote:so nobody is going to actually answer my question?
So you're saying we shouldn't vote our scum reads?In post 107, Wimpy wrote:Just because you say you think he is scum doesn't mean he actually
You said you don't like the votes on wake because they're policy votes. So you don't think they should be voting wake. They say they scum read wake. Ergo you don't think they should be voting their scum read.In post 112, Wimpy wrote:idk how you got that from what I saidIn post 110, Elements wrote:So you're saying we shouldn't vote our scum reads?
this don't mean jack shit if wake only says it as scum. you should be checking his game for when he's said it.In post 166, Wimpy wrote:For those playing at home, Here are the two games where town player says the same thing as wake,
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... 3#p9922853
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... 2#p9854602
I really need to hear a GOOD explanation from profli as to why he is so quick to scum read wake for it when he has seen town do it twice and thus making it null as alidade and myself have pointed out.
They decided to completely fabricate my read on wake which I had at no point eluded to or given and used that to push me as scum multiple times. When no one was joining in they as good as dropped it.In post 465, Elbirn wrote:Can you spoonfeed me a reason for plank-town? I have a lot of lazy scumreads and he's one of them, help me narrow things down friendIn post 459, Saudade wrote:I had UltimatePlank marked as scum in my mind but now I feel otherwise
I'm sorry, but it reads here like you're saying my return from V/LA had something to do with your vote on me? What planet could you be on to possibly think that? I do not believe for a second you genuinely think that your single vote on me changed my activity level or was likely to in the slightest. You just didn't want to vote plank and had to come up with some excuse.In post 483, Looker wrote:"Continue" and "bizarre" (and "fixation") are exaggerative. "Bigger" and "better" are also subjective. Day 1's not over, input is required from everyone, and it worked - Elements returned and contributed as opposed to his previous lackluster posts.In post 467, Elbirn wrote:2. Why do you instead continue to have a bizarre fixation on Elements instead? If there was a time to move on over to bigger and better things it's with this post, but instead you posture about how you're going to move and continue to vote park someone who at the time wasn't even here.
What do you not like about mine?In post 510, Zote the Mighty wrote:Also don't care for Elements's or Plank's votes on Looker either.
I'm getting the same vibes from when I've played with him as town, but I've never played with him as scum so that could just be his whole play style as both alignments.In post 575, Wake1 wrote:Thoughts on Saudade being Scum?
Either he's really dumb or dishonest Town, or he's not-so-subtle Scum.
I found the team back on page 19 guysIn post 466, Elements wrote:They decided to completely fabricate my read on wake which I had at no point eluded to or given and used that to push me as scum multiple times. When no one was joining in they as good as dropped it.In post 465, Elbirn wrote:Can you spoonfeed me a reason for plank-town? I have a lot of lazy scumreads and he's one of them, help me narrow things down friendIn post 459, Saudade wrote:I had UltimatePlank marked as scum in my mind but now I feel otherwise
In 409 they responded to profii in such a jumble of minced words I had to read it twice to understand what they were saying. It's phrased in such a way to make people skimming the thread think salad is scummy when in actual fact the arguments being used are cyclical and make zero sense.
I think 435 and 456 are distancing posts. 435 starts out looking like looker is building up a scum case for UP but then looker decided to keep his vote on me even after using UP's push on me as reasoning for them being scummy? Doesn't make sense.
I think both Looker and UP are scum here.
VOTE: UP
because I don't know how many looker is on and I cba to count.
In post 671, Saudade wrote:We should no lynch due to the no kill,
Or we could lynch the next scum...In post 672, Saudade wrote:Mathematically its optimal.
Why not me?In post 798, UltimatePlank wrote:wake, alimdia, elbirn im never voting in this game
Not advancing the game, advocating no lynch, trying to get the looker wagon to dissolve in favour of a wake one.In post 803, Saladman27 wrote:I don't have much time rn read much, but what's the case on saudade other than tunnelling wake?
Vorkuta will give intent to, but won't follow through with it.In post 840, Saudade wrote:Are you going to hammer me Vorkuta
That doesn't answer my questionIn post 858, Saudade wrote:Well you havent been involved in this game exactlyIn post 855, Elements wrote:Are you scum reading me purely because of my vote on you?
Maybe vote for someone, that might liven it up.In post 902, Saudade wrote:Dead game state tbh
It's L-2In post 907, alimdia wrote:Well I'm not quickhammering
Scrap that, I thought I was voting vork before I unvoted. It is L-1. Read this before you accidentally hammer.
If that wasn't a hammer, intent to hammer
There's something, I don't know if you've heard of it, called being asleep. If you're referring to today's activity that's what I've been doing up until now.
Is that a threat?In post 1088, Wake1 wrote:There's something, I don't know if you've heard of it, called breaking necks. If you're wondering today's activity that's what I've been thinking up to now.In post 1087, Elements wrote:There's something, I don't know if you've heard of it, called being asleep. If you're referring to today's activity that's what I've been doing up until now.
This doesn't make grammatical senseIn post 1088, Wake1 wrote:There's something, I don't know if you've heard of it, called breaking necks.In post 1087, Elements wrote:There's something, I don't know if you've heard of it, called being asleep. If you're referring to today's activity that's what I've been doing up until now.If you're wondering today's activitythat's what I've been thinking up to now.
In post 792, Zote the Mighty wrote:Large Normals do not have third party roles you fools!
@Mod:I will be V/LA until Nov 22nd.
I think the remaining scum is in {Salad, profii, Plank, Saudade}. I will expand on this when I get back.
Precept Forty-One: Learn to Detect Lies. When others speak, they usually lie. Scrutinise and question them relentlessly until they reveal their deceit.
it does say it at the top of the pageIn post 893, Zote the Mighty wrote:I'm good with Saudade and Vork. Those fools need to eat rope.
VOTE: Saudade
Precept Seven: Mourn Not the Dead. When we die, do things get better for us or worse? Theres no way to tell, so we shouldnt bother mourning. Or celebrating for that matter.
In post 792, Zote the Mighty wrote:Large Normals do not have third party roles you fools!
@Mod:I will be V/LA until Nov 22nd.
I think the remaining scum is in {Salad, profii, Plank, Saudade}. I will expand on this when I get back.
Precept Forty-One: Learn to Detect Lies. When others speak, they usually lie. Scrutinise and question them relentlessly until they reveal their deceit.
In post 890, Zote the Mighty wrote:Believe it or not I think Saladman's hammer was kinda townie.In post 801, profii wrote:I think the only person I'd consider voting for on wagon is Salad, he possibly reluctantly voted looker and also I am pinged slightly with him sheeping elements case and saying the day will be quick - it comes over as if he is knowingly going to be inactive and assumes that case will be enough to end the day before he comes back
But that just seems to naive to be scum
In post 893, Zote the Mighty wrote:I'm good with Saudade and Vork. Those fools need to eat rope.
VOTE: Saudade
Precept Seven: Mourn Not the Dead. When we die, do things get better for us or worse? Theres no way to tell, so we shouldnt bother mourning. Or celebrating for that matter.
This progression is very strange as I'm sure you can all see.In post 968, Zote the Mighty wrote:F O O L S !
Were you not aware that Vorkuta was V/LA? Why did we not give him time to claim?
And then continued to tell people to claim which is not at all what the popcorn idea wasIn post 1103, Wake1 wrote: Well, to be fair, I accepted Alimdia's suggestion that we do the popcorn route to claim. I claimed and then passed the popcorn.
The progression of the post is "Two night 3 abilities seems dubious -> neither claim seems like a good scum play"In post 1178, Wake1 wrote:I think it's kind of hilarious, because you're saying it's not possible for there to be two N3 PRs so my unpressured claim is not legitimate, yet Alimdia's vague claim somehow is?
In post 1193, alimdia wrote:That being said, do unvote Wake so theres no fast hammers and what not. And also so we can scrutinize more people
Why are you so placid towards the second N3 protective role?In post 1194, alimdia wrote:As in people unvote on wake
This was an unvote on wake after his outburst when he thought he was lynched. Nothing to do with you.