Newbie 1965 | River | Over
Forum rules
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
why are you so defensive?
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
how do I know you weren't?In post 13, Gjt wrote:It's not defensive, it's me replying to your rubbish. To be lurking would mean I would have to have been hanging around before your comment.
Blatant scum, neither- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
still, this seems unnecessarily aggressive when you only had one vote on you at the time.
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
what's that supposed to mean?In post 24, Blatant Scum wrote:Question.
How many SEs are now in newbie games?
I played some games with 5 SEs, but there are only 3 SEs here.
Which is awesome,because there are only 2 players who can do reading here- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
What do you think of Map Wolf’s 38In post 54, GuiltyLion wrote:
Because I've played a ton of mafia and I've learned to be able to discern awkward "trying too hard" qualities that are generally more likely to come from scumIn post 52, Map Wolf wrote:I'll admit it's very arbitrary as it's mostly just me guessing off of few posts.
But could you elaborate on why you find it fake?
First, you felt compelled to explainwhyyou were posting a readslist in the first place, "since people aren't that active". Theres nothing wrong with posting a readslist, but introducing it like that it's as if you're defending yourself already against an imaginary question of why you were posting it.
Second you take very tentative and weak stances on basically everyone. "Neutral" is not an alignment and not a read. Everyone is either town or scum and if you can't tell me how you feel about them yet then you're not really giving reads at all. Even your scumread is very hedgey, "leaning somewhat scum" reads like you're afraid to make real waves by calling somebody out.
Third, why even comment on players who haven't posted yet? Everybody knows we hadn't posted. Again it's just awkward - sometimes that comes from townies who don't really know what they're doing yet but in my experience it's decent odds of scum.
Finally it's odd that your strongest townread is GBJ, who I actually also find scummy. What makes you think scum couldn't be aggressive? For someone who seems generally hesitant to call everybody town or scum it's weird that you feel most comfortable about that slot in particular.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
Do you think GBJ has been ‘direct’ or ‘disfriendly’?In post 42, Map Wolf wrote:Since people aren't that active, I think I might as well do a read list:
Faustiv,neutral for now. Is kind of aggressive, but I don't think that's all that alignment indicative at least so far.
Gjr,neutral leaning somewhat scum. Seems defensive in tone, but this could also be town too afraid of being lynched. (Which you shouldn't be all that much, since being lynched early doesn't lose the game)
Blatant,neutral. Some stuff posted doesn't make sense to me like 24. Hasn't actually tried to read anyone. Yet.
Titus,V/LA for now.
TGS,Neutral.
GBJ,Town-leaning. Seems a bit aggressive for scum.
Rise,not posted so far.
GuiltyLionhasn't posted either.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
innit just.In post 100, GayBabyJailor wrote:
wow that's rudeIn post 97, Gjt wrote:
That's just a sentence I never thought id see strung togetherIn post 94, faüstiv wrote:gaybaby is town
why are you trying to antagonize me anyway? i put you down as town on my list
put me on your townlist, i'll treat you right.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
ok then.In post 105, TheGildedSun wrote:
Honestly I don't blame you even if this is about myself. I'm not quite sure where this sudden confidence of mine sprang from. Everything just kind of clicked, at least in terms of staying confident behind a vote or accusation. In the beginning (last game) I was dumbfounded on how people were able to draw reads from posts based entirely on town but now it seems plausible. I feel like even though I'm not playing aggressive, I'm trying to ask more questions than to accuse because I feel as though that's not fair (I didn't like it when it was done to me, I appreciated when I was given a chance to explain myself) I do feel like I'm trying to be too on top of things and it looks like I'm trying to take control so I can certainly see where you are coming from.In post 104, faüstiv wrote:this is way different from her last game
like i get she may have read more games and the wiki etc.
but something seems off
have you learned anything from this game so far?- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
yeah exactly.In post 114, GuiltyLion wrote:
didn't like it. Commenting on GBJ the sake of commenting but not drawing any conclusions about alignment. I was kinda wondering if it was a scum-scum coaching interaction like "hey buddy don't come in so hot" or whether it's s-t like "I want to comment on your post but don't worry I'm not scumreading you", but either way it looks disingenuous from Map Wolf. And it's also not really congruent with the mindset that Map Wolf is scumreading and voting GjtIn post 58, faüstiv wrote: What do you think of Map Wolf’s 38
just for the record I didn't like 27 either
the bolded bit is really off, shadethrowing a slot but then stating that it doesn't make him scum, like what point is he trying to make here?That's a rather fast conclusion to be honest.Not that it makes you scum, since that would perhaps be a bit aggressive.
he was really quick to vote Gjt off the bat, calls them neutral/scum in 42:
again this bolded bit 'he might be scum but he may not be because of this' is more likely to come from mafia than town when making an FOS.Gjr, neutral leaning somewhat scum. Seems defensive in tone,but this could also be town too afraid of being lynched. (Which you shouldn't be all that much, since being lynched early doesn't lose the game)- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
In post 117, GuiltyLion wrote:At the moment I agree with faustiv on GBJ/Blatant Scum slots being town and therefore I will grant faustiv a D1 townread as well, though I get the feeling they're gonna be that "10% chance of deep wolf" slot that I randomly get paranoid about from time to time- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
map wolf's last post was 52In post 120, GayBabyJailor wrote:bruh momentum is picking up
anyways heres an updated list
blatant scum: as sus as ever
map wolf:more townish than earlier
faustiv: town
thegildedsun: town
guiltylion: how would you think blatant scum is town after 109
rise: leaning town
gjt: town
your first read list was 64
this makes no sense.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
guessing you reread them. what's pinging towny?In post 122, GayBabyJailor wrote:
can i not change my mind? i can think someone else is being more scummy while still having a scumread on wolfIn post 121, faüstiv wrote:
map wolf's last post was 52In post 120, GayBabyJailor wrote:bruh momentum is picking up
anyways heres an updated list
blatant scum: as sus as ever
map wolf:more townish than earlier
faustiv: town
thegildedsun: town
guiltylion: how would you think blatant scum is town after 109
rise: leaning town
gjt: town
your first read list was 64
this makes no sense.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
OkIn post 128, Map Wolf wrote:
He made two posts prior to my 42. That's one post calling gjt "sus af" and another saying "ok maybe gjt isn't as sus as i say". So yes pretty direct, maybe not disfriendly.In post 59, faüstiv wrote:
Do you think GBJ has been ‘direct’ or ‘disfriendly’?In post 42, Map Wolf wrote:Since people aren't that active, I think I might as well do a read list:
Faustiv,neutral for now. Is kind of aggressive, but I don't think that's all that alignment indicative at least so far.
Gjr,neutral leaning somewhat scum. Seems defensive in tone, but this could also be town too afraid of being lynched. (Which you shouldn't be all that much, since being lynched early doesn't lose the game)
Blatant,neutral. Some stuff posted doesn't make sense to me like 24. Hasn't actually tried to read anyone. Yet.
Titus,V/LA for now.
TGS,Neutral.
GBJ,Town-leaning. Seems a bit aggressive for scum.
Rise,not posted so far.
GuiltyLionhasn't posted either.
If you're going to conclude that (and another conclusion in 95) then it's hard to really take it for much without some elaboration.In post 94, faüstiv wrote:gaybaby is town
I asked that question because in Newbie 1757 you had a slight scumread on a player because he was ‘direct’ and ‘disfriendly’ and you were town in that game. It just pinged me as odd that you TR a player in this game for similar reasons.
eager to see your case on GBJ now.
also I’ll elaborate on that read when I get back at a computer.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
my read on Map Wolf mainly comes from their earlier posts. I don't know if there's an actual term for it, but let me explain.
38
sometimes when scum are making an FOS that they add something at the end like 'but I could be wrong' or 'it's my opinion so don't read too much into it' etc. That's what Wolf is doing here; he's shadethrowing Gjt then counterpoints it by saying 'not that it makes you scum because...'That's a rather fast conclusion to be honest.Not that it makes you scum, since that would perhaps be a bit aggressive.
Scum do this because they need to appease to town. Town aren't scared of being questioned or accused. Scum are. Scum FOSses are made up and they don't like being questioned on it. I mean town do it but town are less likely to add something that mitigates their FOS at the end of their statement than scum.
He does it again in his readlist in 42.
I could see what Wolf said in 126 as a possibility, that the readlist was made for convenience sake for future reference,so I'm not really looking into the fact he made a readlist itself but rather the content of it.Faustiv, neutral for now. Is kind of aggressive,but I don't think that's all that alignment indicative at least so far.
Gjr, neutral leaning somewhat scum. Seems defensive in tone,but this could also be town too afraid of being lynched.(Which you shouldn't be all that much, since being lynched early doesn't lose the game)
Blatant, neutral. Some stuff posted doesn't make sense to me like 24. Hasn't actually tried to read anyone. Yet.
Titus, V/LA for now.
TGS, Neutral.
GBJ, Town-leaning. Seems a bit aggressive for scum.
Rise, not posted so far.
GuiltyLion hasn't posted either.
He also townreads GBJ yet in another game claimed he scumread a player for a similar playstyle. Wolf was town in that game.
I agree with a lot that GuiltyLion said about the slot.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
I don't agree with that line of thinking.
Thoughts change as the game progresses. You don't have to put a conclusion at the end of each FOS you make. You have to look at the motivations behind the vote and the accusations, the reasoning, to determine whether someone is scum or not.
I would align that sort of thinking with more with scum than town as it shows is that the player is afraid of being questioned when their reads change, even though players changing reads happens in pretty much every game.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
yeah my bad ,that game.In post 164, Map Wolf wrote:
That game (I assume you mean 1737 as I didn't participate in 1737) was three years ago. I think I use more reverse psychology thinking right now.In post 135, faüstiv wrote:Ok
I asked that question because in Newbie 1757 you had a slight scumread on a player because he was ‘direct’ and ‘disfriendly’ and you were town in that game. It just pinged me as odd that you TR a player in this game for similar reasons.
eager to see your case on GBJ now.
also I’ll elaborate on that read when I get back at a computer.
do you have any more recent games?- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
hmmmmmmmIn post 174, Titus wrote:My apologies. I didn't realize this had started.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
nothing really. I was hoping for something biggerIn post 180, Titus wrote:
Interesting gambit. What did you learn? How can we trust your other reads?In post 161, faüstiv wrote:also i lied about my blatantscum TR. I think he's kinda null actually, I just wanted to see how people would react if I TR a slot that was being shadethrown; see if anyone panicked.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
why not
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
what do you make of titus?In post 208, GuiltyLion wrote:I could def see myself voting TGS as well, 171 was a bad post especially since TGS herself isn't voting Map Wolf
key to this game is gonna be finding the townie in Map Wolf/Rise/TGS- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
201 reads super paranoid town to me. I don’t think that’s contrived.
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
few reasons why I voted you:In post 219, TheGildedSun wrote:Blatant's mindless following on lynching me concerns me. He talks about Rise, but nothing about me. Then votes me.
Faust, what makes you believe it's me? I'm a bit questioning of you at this point. I like your attempts to gamesolve, but there is something wrong. I think I'm going to re-read last game to find the difference.
I am simply attempting to gamesolve.
One thing that I believe might set one off about me is my neutrality but this is just my playstyle, I don't like focusing on lynching one player.
I didn't see much attempt at gamesolving in the majority of your posts
your playstyle is different from the previous game we played
i wanted to see how you reacted under pressure
A lot of the posts leading up to my vote were lengthy but lacked substance. I think 60 comes across as a gamesolvey post but 86 for example does not. I think scum when scumhunting can ask questions which really aren't going to be answered in a way which we can determine their alignment. For example in my previous game Farren did this and I called him out on it. He turned out to be scum in the end. The part in question:
I find this bolded question to be really odd and I fail to see what answers it will provide? GBJ is clearly a new player when it comes to forum mafia; we know that from the posts he made early on in the game. I don't see what town!TGS could learn from GBJ by asking this question.And I don't want to be speaking on their behalf and just assuming things, so I'd like to give Jailor a chance to explain. GBJ, what are your first thoughts on this game so far,and were you confused or unsure in the beginning at all?
99 is a bit weird too.
don't see why TGS brings this point up to an SE and the point itself is kinda weird. why is TGS so focused on gamesolving and not appearing suspicious. it speaks of the mindset that TGS has at that point in the game; trying to gamesolve (which i don't see much of leading up to 99) but also not trying to appear suspicious. i'll probably be able to explain myself better when i properly wake up, but it makes sense in my head.If you're not actively acting to gamesolve then you're going to appear suspicious to people. If you give off this vibe that "I'll just leave it to the other players" then it makes you appear like you aren't all in for town victory.
A mafia game won't be "relaxing," in fact that kind of goes against the general feel. Mafia games can get heated and for good reason, it's a social deduction game. Of course a player isn't required to constantly be in the heat but it is important to contribute, especially if you actually are town aligned, and the way you have no interest kind of sets me off in a weird way. But not in a way that makes me feel that you are no doubt scum, at least not yet, because I feel as though that would be too obvious. No, I am just a bit confused on why this is the case.
don't get 107 either, just a load of general statements:
question was 'have you learned anything from this game so far?' i don't think it's answered here.Well this game is really only just beginning and we haven't had any real wagons yet (well, kind of a jump on Map Wolf and now Blatant) but nothing too major. So far I feel like looking into a players prior experience is vital to reading their tone in posts, as what happened to I in the beginning of last game. I'm kind of seeing myself in some of the other players here and trying to put myself into their shoes. I also understand that that can be dangerous too because automatically ruling out someone as mafia just because they are a newer player isn't always a good way to go. We have to consider all possibilities, misdirection is something crucial to scum so we have to work hard to not be fooled.
110
I want to know where this TR of blatant scum came from, since it came out of the blue at the time. what made you TR him before post 110?So far no. I agree with you in terms of GBJ not being scum (reasons stated previously) and same with Blatant. I feel that Blatant has a higher likelyhood of being scum though between the two.
We haven't heard much of anything from Titus as they are V/LA, nor have GuiltyLion or Map Wolf spoken recently. In fact I'd like to hear something from the two of them. There was that big jump on Map Wolf but it seemed a little too quickly agreed upon for my tastes, especially with both Blatant and Guilty jumping on the wagon which I don't fully know how I feel about them yet, I do believe Blatant is most likely town (but can't say for sure yet, too early) and Guilty hasn't spoken enough for me to have drawn any inferences.
gtj being defensive, it was kind of odd how they admitted they were acting slightly off in the beginning but then also clarifying they weren't new to the idea of D1 votes, which makes me think they are town. I feel like mafia would of went along with not having been familiar with the votes, claiming that's where the panic originated from.
I now notice that you SR him a bit more in 219.
BS also voted Map Wolf in 57, putting him in L2, but you townread him in 110. Why do you FOS him more now that he's voted you when he did exactly the same to Map Wolf?Blatant's mindless following on lynching me concerns me. He talks about Rise, but nothing about me. Then votes me.
219 was also a horrible reaction to my vote
this is another example of what I said in regards to 99, she seems self aware. why are you so paranoid now votes are on you when you were less so when there were lots of votes were on other players?Faust, what makes you believe it's me? I'm a bit questioning of you at this point. I like your attempts to gamesolve, but there is something wrong. I think I'm going to re-read last game to find the difference.
I am simply attempting to gamesolve.
One thing that I believe might set one off about me is my neutrality but this is just my playstyle, I don't like focusing on lynching one player.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
Titus is flying under the radar; too much for my liking considering his posts.
post 23:
completely contradicts post 174:You don't seem to be a newbie.
VLA this weekend.
in live mafia scum do this a lot; fake afk then come in at some point later in the day to say that 'they didn't know the game started' so people townread them as villager. probably not the case in forum mafia, however this does need exploring. why did you make 174 Titus?My apologies. I didn't realize this had started.
183:
you claim BS is anti town and that Map Wolf's vote is opportunistic but could come from town, yet vote Map Wolf instead of BS.Right now, I see a divide in the town centered on Map Wolf and BS. BS is definitely anti-town but Map Wolf's vote is opportunistic (town or scum opportunism though). I think right now the best thing to do is to tie up the wagons and see what responses occur.
vote count at this time was:
a vote from Titus on BS would put him on L1, so if you think he's anti town, why did you not do so? why did you pick Map Wolf instead?Blatant Scum (3): Rise, GayBabyJailor, Map Wolf
Map Wolf (2): faüstiv, GuiltyLion,
Rise (1): Blatant Scum
Not Voting (3): Gjt, Titus, TheGildedSun
don't get line of thinking in 230. can you explain that to me?
262:Glided Sun and BS both have wagons to 3 again.
This suggest Map wolf and GS have the same alignment.
so where do your thoughts lie?I didn't say they were both town. They could both be scum. The same people, particularly you and faustiv voting the same wagons suggest the same alignment for them.
If they are opposites, then it suggests BS is scum to me.
if you're voting Map Wolf then that suggests you think he is scum. do you think TGS is town? if so why not vote BS. there's no progression to consider here because this post stems from a logical analysis made by Titus in 183.
vote count for reference:
Blatant Scum (3): Rise, GayBabyJailor, Map Wolf
TheGildedSun (3): faüstiv, Blatant Scum, GuiltyLion
Map Wolf (1): Titus
GayBabyJailor (1): Gjt
Not Voting (1): TheGildedSun- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
are you ccing?In post 297, Titus wrote:That's the most blatant cc search I have seen.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
you’re misrepping me.In post 314, GuiltyLion wrote:other players of suspicion:
faustiv I really didn't like that L-1 vote especially claiming "Blatant Scum is easily being townread" when I was literally the only person townreading and defending Blatant when he had 3 other players voting him and another (Rise) posturing to vote him. And also why would being easily townread be scum-indicative?? If he's scum then there's only one other buddy to defend him. Widely being townread isusuallya town-tell as it generally means the scum are townreading players they don't want to touch / don't think can be plausibly scumread or pushed.
TGS still has not done anything of consequence this game
Rise we'll have to see what she does today. Only real pushes yesterday were on town.
I didnt vote BS because he was easily being TRed. When I was casing Titus I noticed something off with their interactions so I wanted to vote either of them because I thought they could be a scumteam. Titus was unattainable yesterday so I chose BS.
I’m on phone so I will expand on this later.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
yeah I don’t understand this logic at all.In post 324, Titus wrote:
That's just flat out wrong. I'm not trading our doctor, if one even exists, for outed scum. If BS was scum, my move was very optimal. Based on BS's play, hammering was the correct move to make.In post 316, GuiltyLion wrote:Also, no matter how antitown they are, you never hammer an un-CC'd doctor claim on D1.
Sure, BS was town here by fluke but BS wasn't a claimed doctor. He soft claimed to fish with intent on him.- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
-
faüstiv Goon
- faüstiv
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 752
- Joined: September 7, 2019
are you going to answer my question?In post 334, Titus wrote:
It was not a 50/50 risk. Town players don't soft claim. Period. I thought I was protecting the real doctor or preventing scum from coasting on a fake claimIn post 329, Map Wolf wrote:The hammer was really stupid if town and really scummy regardless of alignment.
It's like a 50/50 that it's a genuine doctor... not worth the risk. - faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv
- faüstiv