Newbie 1971 [Game Over!]
Forum rules
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Was this a joke or was it serious?In post 23, GuiltyLion wrote:I don't like this post, Menalque had already posted yet the vote is made without any engagement + greeting the thread felt awkward
VOTE: Non Imh- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
That’s true. I just wanted to confirm because I didn’t want to misunderstand.In post 56, Uncrowned wrote:Why would you think it's not serious, especially given the rest of the content that slot has produced so far?
If it is, then I definitely agree the push was unfair. I didn’t see anything wrong with the entry.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Not much. I know the concepts and have watched other people play but I’ve only played once or twice myself.In post 93, skitter30 wrote:
hey! how much mafia experience do you have?In post 87, Kanna wrote:@GuiltyLion #72 Honestly, I have no idea - I don’t think the entry says anything. Why is it likely to come from scum?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Alright, please elaborate.In post 106, Map Wolf wrote:
I can elaborate on it if needed, but I feel like town would at least cast a vote.In post 105, skitter30 wrote:Why do you think that's more likely than newbtown who isnt sure how to interact/engage with the game?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
I'm suspicious of almost everyone actually. Many people in this game are well guarded in a way that I have trouble trusting.In post 111, skitter30 wrote:
Ok do you have any suspicions of anyone yet? Or is there anyone you're liking so far? It's ok if you're not sure of the read or if its only a gut feelingIn post 108, Kanna wrote:I'm sorry I haven't said anything meaningful, it's not on purpose. At this point, I just really don't know who is most likely to be scum.
I think my top town leans are you (because you have been the most fair so far + I agree with your logic the most) and GL (because even though I don’t agree with that push, I feel like he’s being genuine)- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
I don’t agree I’ve been vague. I’ve tried my best to express what I’m thinking and I can't be any more "certain" because I'm not sure.In post 115, Uncrowned wrote:So ideally then you'd want to put your vote on someone to at least attempt to generate discussion about that slot.
I think you're being a little vague and that might indicate that you're not taking scumhunting all that seriously.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Can I ask why you’re voting for me? Is it because you think I'm not being helpful or do you think I'm scum?
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Sorry, miswording on my part but what I wanted you to elaborate on was "why town would at least cast a vote."In post 121, Map Wolf wrote:
Okay sure. I can see that being the case if town.In post 108, Kanna wrote:I'm sorry I haven't said anything meaningful, it's not on purpose. At this point, I just really don't know who is most likely to be scum.
So the reason why I said that you were "probably scum" is because of the lack of any reaction to my kind of out there vote. As for why I scumread you? I just wanted to see your reaction to it.In post 109, Kanna wrote:Alright, please elaborate.
To respond, I thought your vote was a joke. Why would I react? And ok? So do you scumread me or not? What?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
In post 107, Uncrowned wrote:That actually reminds me of my newbie scum buddy in Newb 1963 that initially didnt want to cast their vote
Not saying it's necessarily the same thing here buuuuuut its definitely possibleIn post 115, Uncrowned wrote:So ideally then you'd want to put your vote on someone to at least attempt to generate discussion about that slot.
I think you're being a little vague and that might indicate that you're not taking scumhunting all that seriously.
Hmm I feel like you're shading me in bad faith. VOTE: UncrownedIn post 120, Uncrowned wrote:Also from what I know, it's easier for scum to TL than it is for them to SL, as they know who's innocent and who isn't, hence they have to put more effort in / sometimes "reach" to show that they're scumhunting.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
In post 121, Map Wolf wrote:
Okay sure. I can see that being the case if town.In post 108, Kanna wrote:I'm sorry I haven't said anything meaningful, it's not on purpose. At this point, I just really don't know who is most likely to be scum.In post 109, Kanna wrote:Alright, please elaborate.So the reason why I said that you were "probably scum" is because of the lack of any reaction to my kind of out there vote. As for why I scumread you? I just wanted to see your reaction to it.In post 137, Map Wolf wrote:In post 122, Kanna wrote: To respond, I thought your vote was a joke. Why would I react? And ok? So do you scumread me or not? What?I don't know if I would expect you to react. Do I scumread you? No.
These are the posts which sorta...rub me the wrong way?In post 138, Map Wolf wrote:In post 134, skitter30 wrote:
I dont really think the lack of reaction is aiIn post 121, Map Wolf wrote:So the reason why I said that you were "probably scum" is because of the lack of any reaction to my kind of out there vote.I was more hoping for some kind of potential scumslip.
For #121, I have trouble believing that initial vote and push on me was just a test - it felt like an actual push and then MW backpeddled when I didn't look as scummy as they hoped.
#122; This still confuses me. Again MW, do you scumread me or not? This post and your vote say two different things. It kinda looks like you want to push me but can't find a reason to. Hence the vote is still on me but there is no reasoning.
#138; MW hoping I scumslip...ok- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
I did defend myself by pointing out how I thought you were being unfair/shading me and you turned around and said I was threatened so?? I really didn’t think we were on an even playing field so it was unnecessary for me to go further.In post 178, Uncrowned wrote:Again, I've asked her to show where I'm misrepping.
If she can't put the effort to defend herself in, why would you do it for her? You're cutting off our avenues of finding scum by relieving pressure atm.
You do you I guess- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
@192; I think I caught something there but I will have to reread and quote some posts for evidence. Basically, I now really don’t buy the voting me then saying I was scummy was a reaction test. I don’t find it very natural + I think this post contradicts something earlier. Really looks like MW backing off of me because I’m not such an easy push anymore.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
What do you mean by opportunistic vibes? Why haven't you looked into them if you got opportunistic vibes?In post 198, Uncrowned wrote:
I asked for specific instances of where I supposedly misrepresented you. You just saying it's unfair isn't really telling me anything.In post 194, Kanna wrote:
I did defend myself by pointing out how I thought you were being unfair/shading me and you turned around and said I was threatened so?? I really didn’t think we were on an even playing field so it was unnecessary for me to go further.In post 178, Uncrowned wrote:Again, I've asked her to show where I'm misrepping.
If she can't put the effort to defend herself in, why would you do it for her? You're cutting off our avenues of finding scum by relieving pressure atm.
You do you I guess
Your reaction was eh and I'm not really worried about your slot atm. More interested in Skit. Feels like she's trying to go out of her way to defend ppl when it's not necessary and shuts down dialogue between other slots. Almost like trying to get some cred from the people she's defending. Would be a very smart move as scum to try and do that.
Haven't really looked into Map Wolf much yet but I do recall getting some opportunistic vibes from them.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
This is weird. These posts are almost right next to each other.
In post 222, Map Wolf wrote:In post 217, GuiltyLion wrote:
this isn't a read. I want you to make a choice here which you think is more likely.In post 204, Map Wolf wrote:
Null. His vote on you is either opportunistic or just town wanting something to actually happen.In post 197, Kanna wrote:Hmmm... @Uncrowned, what is your opinion on Map Wolf?
@Map Wolf, what is your opinion on Uncrowned?Town is more likely.Seriously, what do you think about Uncrowned?? Also hmmmm so do you scumread skitter?
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Do you mean this?In post 259, Uncrowned wrote:But it was minor stuff like prodding to see if anyone would go with a GL lynch. Believe it was on page 2 or 3
In post 76, Map Wolf wrote:If GL's play is going to be similar to Rivers, then I wouldn't mind lynching him day one, lol.
Honestly wasn't sure what this was trying to say the first time I read it. The take that this is "prodding to see if anyone would go with a GL lynch" is interesting. If so, then I think that's less opportunistic and more scummy?In post 77, Map Wolf wrote:^Nothing personal, but let's find scum early on.
MW, can you also explain this?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
I think it's as I thought that these posts are (mostly) irrelevant banter.In post 282, GuiltyLion wrote:
to be faaaaair, the dayIn post 265, Map Wolf wrote:In Newbie 1965, we ended up mislynching GL day 2 with him insisting on what would have also been a mislynch. So I was actually joking there, since lynching someone based solely off of a previous game doesn't really make sense.startedwith me insisting even harder on what would have been a scum lynch, and then I pivoted only when the scum partner convinced all of us that the scum I was pushing was actually the PR (while the real PR said nothing because she was scumreading me the whole game)
However...it is kind of a weird joke because Guilty was town in that game. Wouldn't it be more natural to joke about lynching him if he were scum? I don't get this joke.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Like who? ~for some reason~ I don't think you'll say Map Wolf.In post 294, Uncrowned wrote:If you can't see what I've been doing this game I'm gonna be disappointed, to say the least.
There's slots here who need a lot more focus than me.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
If Map Wolf can answer this and give aIn post 274, skitter30 wrote:Mapwolf why are you thinking me/uncrowned?properopinion on Uncrowned, that would be great.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
@298; Call me sceptical, but I have trouble believing in "reaction tests". Like who's to say it's not just a cop out for scummy behaviour?
For this case, consider; I said I was new to mafia early on and believe this was before your push/test/whatever on me. You knew I was new. Being new, don't you think there was a relatively high chance I would "break" if you attacked me? And if I did, would you (as town) be fully ok with lynching me when my mess up could just be because I was inexperienced? I'm honestly less convinced it was a reaction test and more so it was a trap. Also, would me not breaking really even tell you I'm town?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Is more coming? Because I am not satisfied.In post 320, Map Wolf wrote:
Mostly thought the idea of you bussing uncrowned could kind of make sense.In post 274, skitter30 wrote:Mapwolf why are you thinking me/uncrowned?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Ok I'm glad we established that for my own sanity. I don't know if I agree with that form of scum hunting though (if it is hmmm). The rate of error seems far too high.In post 326, Uncrowned wrote:Well, yeah. If you messed up, I would've been fine with taking my chances and trying to lynch you.
It's not a matter of who is DEFINITELY scum because almost always there'll be a good chance you're wrong. To me it's about finding who is most likely to be scum and go with them, and live with the results.
I'm no expert, if I'm wrong I'm wrong. Your reactions to me appeared to be how a new townie would react. It's not 100% but it's what I'm thinking atm.
And yeah, you can call my earlier push unfair. It was desgined to be that way.
About my reaction; was I even townie in that reaction? Are you sure you didn't just back off because everyone defended me and it was hard for you to keep going?
See, I personally didn't feel like I was especially townie there; my response was to engage as little as possible because I could tell you were being unfair. And correct me if I'm wrong, but I think people were on my side because you were scummy more so than I was townie.
Tell me how I was "townie".- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
1) the speed was insaneIn post 441, Uncrowned wrote:Expand on why you think that
2) Mena didn't even explain why GBJ was his highest scumread but 2 people sheeped him
3) This isn't really a point but I don't agree about GBJ and I'll explain later- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
I agree with this + Skitter but the fact Mena and Map strongly suggested this put a bad taste in my mouth. Who are you trying to trick? I highly highly highly doubt that's a thing.In post 536, GayBabyJailor wrote:im on for a few minutes
if yall think im susp because i put billy as seems town instead of town thats bad
i was going to originally have more reasoning in there but decided not to because i hadnt read isos yet- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Ok I will tonight. Will be inactive for the rest of today because work.In post 539, Menalque wrote:
YesIn post 537, Kanna wrote:I think I want to go this way VOTE: Map Wolf
Right now, Map fits into too many of my possible scumpairs and I SR them pretty hard individually too.If anyone wants me to make a case on them, I can.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
I actually love this theory - like, I almost wish I was scum so I could take the credit. Unfortunately, it's wrong.In post 589, Non lmh wrote:@Map, they're playing dirty and I'm petty af
(assuming I'm right about everything)
VOTE: Kanna
Anyways, Non is probably town. So is GBJ. Agree with Billy's #578.
Map Wolf case coming soon.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna