Mini Theme 2112: Skyrim Mod Upick Town Win
Forum rules
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Warrior means Plurality at deadline means we get less info about who would vote someone at the deadline.
Wizard means 1 less vote to hammer, which means we get 1 less voting info about who would vote someone.
Archer means scum won't get PT, but any other PT groups also won't get it.
My crackpot theory is that whichever stone is active also powers other stuff- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
^In post 95, Eve wrote:what's that?
Honestly claiming the 5 role thing is a better idea than claiming flavourIn post 92, popsofctown wrote:
Well I think maybe it's just not a good enough of an idea.In post 91, Pine wrote: That kind of defeats the purpose, though :/
For sake of argument, in a normal setup, you could have everyone claim a set of five roles they possibly are and constrain their claims to those five in massclaim later, but it isn't deemed to be a good tradeoff against giving the scum the information. Here you're not getting to handpick the X roles, and there's a concern that X might be a lot closer to one or two sometimes.
I think the occasional use of flavor cops in uPicks is a better justification than anything else- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Your basis is basically from 1 whole game of meta? Not too keen on that.In post 110, popsofctown wrote:Alimdia after our last game I'm worried I won't sort you right because you get kind of adversarial sometimes. And that makes me want to read red.
Let's try not to bristle our quills too soon to figure things out.
What do you think about my basis for thinking a day 1 Blatant Scum lynch might be a good idea?
No idea about the Upick thing.In post 117, Sujimichi wrote:
Are not Upicks usually games where everyone has some type of role? They have been in the two games that I have played.In post 83, alimdia wrote:Pretty sure you're trying to bait out PRs here
So, what do you make of Pine trying successfully to bait 2 ppl?In post 86, alimdia wrote:Looks like Pine already baited 2 ppl
Seems anti-town to do so. Helps scum narrow down which roles they are afraid of and kill those.
Ima sheep you nowIn post 123, Sujimichi wrote:
TiphanieDeath had already posted after the conclusion of the first phase. He voted on page 3 in post #51.In post 121, popsofctown wrote:Blatant Scum made his PT comment in the middle of page 2. Thief Stone was hammered towards the bottom of page 2. If TiphaineDeath decided to post before fully reading the thread, I would expect that to naturally occur at a page transition.
If it didn't occur at a page transition, and he was so excited about the content of Blatant's post that he jumped to page 5 to vote, I would expect the sequencing "vote blatant scum, vote warrior stone"
I am going to VOTE: TiphaineDeath on this.
See my previous postIn post 172, Sujimichi wrote:I would like for alimdia to explain why they are posting in the Neighborhood thread despite:
- All PTs being locked for the rest of the day phase
- Not posting in the main thread
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
yeah I assume you are saying Eve is scummy as you are voting her, but at this point it looks like you're just flinging random votes to do something instead of actually trying to convince other people that X is scum? For the record Eve saying shes in a neighbourhood with me is really suspicious.In post 226, Sujimichi wrote:
This is the second occurrence of you not reading the game and missing something of note whilst continuing to vote people for actions or play that you deem bad, but do not attribute alignment to. How is it that you were able to find my post to zero in on, but not understand the broader context of the game at that moment?In post 221, TiphaineDeath wrote:Waitaminute, there was a thing, with a fake neighborhood, and posting when you couldn't?- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
VOTE: TiphaineDeathIn post 236, TiphaineDeath wrote:Here's another random flung vote for you then, VOTE: Alim
I consider post#228 a scum-claim, and will exercise my position as resident tenacious delirium by leaving vote here until there is a REALLY good reason not to. Also, anyone who can tell me why I made that vote gets a cookie.
No you give the reasons for the vote, not ask people to give you one because you couldn't think one up.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Firstly, it wasn't OMGUS.
Secondly.... OMGUS isn't a scumtell anyway.
Thirdly, you can fuck off with your condescending 'sweetie'
The real post after:
Does a vote based off ..... a joke claim. Seems like a way to avoid talking about other stuff. Currently NAIIn post 119, TiphaineDeath wrote:VOTE: WarriorStone
VOTE: BlatantScum
Yeah, I actually give 0 fucks whether this is town or scum, some behaviors must be punished or they continue.
Doing it again. Add in some ATE with the 'may replace out' part, which breaks site rules by the way. Still NAIIn post 159, TiphaineDeath wrote:No, see, there are actions that are less-than-competent and actions that are blacklist worthy. Scumclaims, in my opinion, fall in to the latter category, only now I have two of them because sujimichi felt like doing it to so now I just hate everyone. I may simply ask to be replaced out of this game with apologies to JJH, have not decided yet.
How many people have claimed scum or fake claimed something from your POV now?In post 191, TiphaineDeath wrote:No, post #153 was a scumclaim, and the fact that you don't immediately know that tells me you are in fact scum xD. VOTE: sujimichi
Trolls don't deserve rope. And it's not even a troll, just someone having fun. The only person that has the right of being a little mad is me, since I got dragged into a 'can talk in neighbourhood after theif stone hammered' claim, which was completely false. So far, all you've done is targeted people making 'joke claims'.In post 210, TiphaineDeath wrote:IF THAT WASN'T A JOKE POST, HE IS SCUM.
If it was a joke post, he is a troll, and deserves rope.
Your rational for me being scum is the flimsiest piece of bullshit I have seen in years and I am half a breath away from either full-raging or voting you for it.
In post 220, TiphaineDeath wrote:Feh, alright, fine, back to this then VOTE: BS and I mean that in all of its clever connotations.
You clearly read about it since you literally talked about it above (regarding Eve) See below:In post 221, TiphaineDeath wrote:Waitaminute, there was a thing, with a fake neighborhood, and posting when you couldn't?
I've explained the 'shit', but all you did was vote Eve without an explanation.In post 160, TiphaineDeath wrote:Also as far as actual scum-hunting goes, unless Alim wants to come in and explain some shit to me I am pretty ready to vote eve for president.
Still waiting for why 228 is a scum claim. That might never come.In post 236, TiphaineDeath wrote:Here's another random flung vote for you then, VOTE: Alim
I consider post#228 a scum-claim, and will exercise my position as resident tenacious delirium by leaving vote here until there is a REALLY good reason not to. Also, anyone who can tell me why I made that vote gets a cookie.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Proof that OMGUS isn't a scumtell: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... 6&start=50
Why my vote is not an OMGUS: I have other reasons for voting you (see above post), and not just solely because your vote happened to be on me.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Explain your town read? This really reads like a soft defense.In post 254, Blatant Scum wrote:
I have a town read on TiphaineDeath, but I wish to keep the reason a secret for a while, observing his reactions on the wagon to make sure my read is correct.In post 249, Sujimichi wrote:Blatant Scum, what are your thoughts on what has transpired so far? Any stances on players?
I have a crackpot theory that you and Wake are scum together.In post 259, Eve wrote:i am kinda suspicious of alimdia honestly - the way he's reacted so far reads to me as scum who knows someone is lying about something stupid and doesn't know how to react
he's in half a mind calling me suspicious for it and half a mind saying i'm just trolling
what is your read on me alimdia?
I mean... finding scum by yourself is only part 1. part 2 is convincing everyone else that you are right. If you're only doing part 1, you're doing us a great disservice.In post 261, Zenith wrote:
You're welcome to think whatever you want. I pay attention and keep personal notes. Have released personal notes pt to public at the end of completed game before.In post 247, Sujimichi wrote:
I disagree. Your thoughts on other players, however minor you may think them, help establish your viewpoint and creates content with which to assess yours, and others', alignment. By withholding them, I am forced to think you do not actually have any.In post 234, Zenith wrote:
Nothing really worth sharing yet.In post 233, Sujimichi wrote:Will you please share them?
Secondly, I don't understand the relevance of releasing personal notes at the end of the game, by that point the game is over - going "I was right!" doesnt really help anyone.
Finally, imagine if everyone says what you said - that they have their own reads but aren't sharing them. Do you think the game will progress or will it stagnate?
You mean ali?In post 268, TiphaineDeath wrote:Yeah, 10000% one or more of eve+ami=scum, maybe both, but DEF one at this point.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I said 'it looks like you are flinging random votes to do something instead of actually trying to convince other people that X is scum?'.In post 255, TiphaineDeath wrote:Meh, no one wants to play with me. Fine 228 is scum because inconsistency=scum. It's literally the number one classic scum tell and the fact that no one else found it in the page or so since I pointed it out is rather depressing to me TBH.
You throw shade on me, the current leading wagon, and call the eve vote random while at the same time saying that eve's behavior is suspicious. You have the fence post lodged so firmly in your ass that I'm surprised the post didn't get censored for NSFW.
Please do not misrep me.
Is it not true? Look at your ISO. Before me, you've been flinging votes on people that make jokes/scum claims/whatever. Once again, you are doing part 1 and not part 2 (see prev post for what part 1 and part 2 are)
Yes Eve's behaviour is suspicious which is why my post 229 is asking for clarification.
I do feel that a lot of people are getting away with lurking though, so I will do a full analysis of everyone else later.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
This is the extent of you pointing out why I'm scummy btw.In post 262, Zenith wrote:
Agree ^In post 256, TiphaineDeath wrote:Also saying something like "I didn't do it, and even if I did it's not bad," is hardcore lawyer talk, and, yeah, you guessed it, pretty damn scummy.
Also what's this thing you're doing where you ask everyone for permission to vote for someone? Do what you wish so that people can judge you for it later, not pawn it off on groupthink.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Looked through the playerlist thoughts other than TD:
Aernonaut: 4 posts, voted Theif Stone, other than that only has RVS votes/unvotes.
BlatantScum: Voted thief stone, a lot of fluff and jokes in his posts. I feel like there is some meat in post #254. Could you expand on why
you have a TR on Tiphaine? Activity is already low enough atm as is.
Dongfish: I see your last post, look forward to your posts!
Eve: Why wake and me specifically for your cheeky neighbourhood story? I know you said it sounded fun - but why us 2 specifically?
Not too much non-fluff content either.. mostly seemed to be directed at me.
Gobbledygook:Why?
Why?
I agree!In post 214, gobbledygook wrote:I think that the asking permission to vote someone and then the subsequent post filled with questions is scummy.
GuyInFreezer,Wake: Post moar plx
Pine: Voted thief stone, suggested a flavor claim, got a couple of claims, defers to Zenith??? for a D2 mass flavor claim. What do you think about the td vs me interaction?
pops: Is your main case on TD at the moment, you thinking he faked a town slip? What do you think about the td vs me interaction?
Sujimichi: Quite active (NAI), logical (NAI) and also I like his post 257. Forced to TR him at this point since he's one of the few trying.
Bit tired of scummy people saying 'OMGUS' and then... just because they voted me first, it means I can't vote for them if I have other reasons?In post 248, Sujimichi wrote:
An opinion poll from 12 years ago is not proof, and I question why you exerted effort to find that to support your opinion instead of a simple dismissal of it as invalid. Could you help me understand your reaction? Overall, your defense seems disproportionate to the attack, but that could be your behavioral style, and I don't disagree with your rationale for placing the vote, to begin with.In post 244, alimdia wrote:Proof that OMGUS isn't a scumtell: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... 6&start=50
Why my vote is not an OMGUS: I have other reasons for voting you (see above post), and not just solely because your vote happened to be on me.
Zenith: I do want to know why you keep asking everyone if you can vote X though?- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Just wanna hear your reasonings basicallyIn post 277, gobbledygook wrote:Alimidia, what are you wanting answered with your second “why” to me?- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Also I just checked all his games to see if its something he usually does. It's not.In post 278, Blatant Scum wrote:
Again.In post 271, Zenith wrote:May I have permission to vote for alimdia?
You don't need permission to vote.
It isyourvote. If you feel that you should vote the person, vote it.
As long as it is not a hammer.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
So what you are saying is that you have no opinions or reads about everyone else? Since that's what we're trying to get you to share, not what you ate for breakfast.In post 297, Zenith wrote:
Blue green 42 burritos mmm sriracha kittens moonlight nefarious rasta beetle.In post 283, Sujimichi wrote:
I think you miss the point. Withholding your thoughts does not help advance the game, and sharing them does. I do not see the benefit to town for you to withhold them.In post 261, Zenith wrote:You're welcome to think whatever you want. I pay attention and keep personal notes. Have released personal notes pt to public at the end of completed game before.
Sharing every thought would be a antitown. Not witholding anything worth sharing.
Why not?
Also...1) you never asked permission to vote for people in your other games.
2) by asking everyone, you attempt to remove responsibility from yourself
I believe it was 247. It definitely seems to help town more, and I'd have made that post too.In post 286, Sujimichi wrote:
Blatant Scum made post 257. Which post of mine did you like, and why did you like it?In post 276, alimdia wrote:Sujimichi: Quite active (NAI), logical (NAI) and also I like his post 257. Forced to TR him at this point since he's one of the few trying.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
By the way, BS made the same argument.In post 330, Pine wrote:I’m growing to despise that argument. Even assuming both of TD’s partners decided to stick their necks out to defend him (unlikely) that would only be two people. “Resistance” is really only valid in large games where there’s a substantial scumteam covering one another and lategame when the ratio is more perilous.
Sup Fishy. Can you get me into this game? The weird thing is that it has some of my favorite players, but I’m not switched on yet
In post 281, Blatant Scum wrote:
My point is, that he didn't do anything scummy at all, yet was catapulted to L-2.In post 269, alimdia wrote:Explain your town read? This really reads like a soft defense.
+ some minor tonal reads.
I don't see how BS is scum atm, but I can agree on your pops read.In post 293, gobbledygook wrote:
Pops is posing lots of original thoughts rather than trite buzzword scumhunting which is typical of scum.In post 279, alimdia wrote:
Just wanna hear your reasonings basicallyIn post 277, gobbledygook wrote:Alimidia, what are you wanting answered with your second “why” to me?
Blatant Scum is blatant scum. I mean it is in the name. Can he be anymore obvious?
You already commented on my Zenith suspicions, which we agree on. Yay!
In post 294, gobbledygook wrote:
Normally I agree, but at this stage of the game I would disagree.In post 292, Sujimichi wrote:alimdia would have had three votes and TiphaineDeath four. To say that your vote placed on anyone else would have been equivalent is disingenuous. Why is it better to take TiphaineDeath from four to five than alimdia from two to three? To simply create a larger wagon is not a good answer, as is it not also useful to review wagons of similar size?
So you think TD is town because of DongFish's vote?In post 315, gobbledygook wrote:I think a Sujimichi, Eve foundation for a town block is a good start.
VOTE: Dongfish this is probably scum for that vote though
So basically you think speaking in 'lawyer talk' = I'm scum.In post 310, Zenith wrote:
What more reasoning do I need to find you scummy?In post 273, alimdia wrote:
This is the extent of you pointing out why I'm scummy btw.In post 262, Zenith wrote:
Agree ^In post 256, TiphaineDeath wrote:Also saying something like "I didn't do it, and even if I did it's not bad," is hardcore lawyer talk, and, yeah, you guessed it, pretty damn scummy.
Posts 243 and 244 were pretty sus..
I would like to vote you. I asked for permission to vote you. How is asking for permission pawning anything off on group think? I'm not sheeping or asking who to vote.In post 273, alimdia wrote:
Also what's this thing you're doing where you ask everyone for permission to vote for someone? Do what you wish so that people can judge you for it later, not pawn it off on groupthink.
Nobody has given permission yet either.
If someone, anyone could just humor and grant permission each time I ask, then we could pretend I never asked and functionally it wouldn't matter.
And as others have said... asking for permission IS pawning off on group think. @everyone, I'd like your input on this.
The only exception is if.... as someone pointed out, your role actually needs permission for you to vote....
In post 316, Eve wrote:
why do you townread me?In post 315, gobbledygook wrote:I think a Sujimichi, Eve foundation for a town block is a good start.
VOTE: Dongfish this is probably scum for that vote though
zenith - i give you permission to vote alimdia but only if you're town - if you're scum please vote sujimichi instead
Nonsense? That's all you got?In post 328, Zenith wrote:
Nonsense.In post 322, alimdia wrote:
So what you are saying is that you have no opinions or reads about everyone else? Since that's what we're trying to get you to share, not what you ate for breakfast.In post 297, Zenith wrote:
Blue green 42 burritos mmm sriracha kittens moonlight nefarious rasta beetle.In post 283, Sujimichi wrote:
I think you miss the point. Withholding your thoughts does not help advance the game, and sharing them does. I do not see the benefit to town for you to withhold them.In post 261, Zenith wrote:You're welcome to think whatever you want. I pay attention and keep personal notes. Have released personal notes pt to public at the end of completed game before.
Sharing every thought would be a antitown. Not witholding anything worth sharing.
Why not?
Also...1) you never asked permission to vote for people in your other games.
2) by asking everyone, you attempt to remove responsibility from yourself
VOTE: alimdia- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- alimdia
-
alimdia
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
You mean the neighbour that you never talked in yet? (Even at night)In post 420, Wake1 wrote:
I for one want to actually be able to use our Neighborhood.In post 412, alimdia wrote:Okay so...
No jokes..
I'm going to out my neighborhood because it seems like we are going to hammer thief stone again, and one of the members agreed last night.
We have... Wake, Aeronaut and I
If we're just going to keep voting Thief stone that's boring.
Warrior stone powers Warrior roles.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
It could be wake simply because he just never talked in it. But I'm not sure if thats because he's afraid of not acting like a 'mason' like a town neighbour would, or just because he's afk as shit.In post 419, Sujimichi wrote:
Who do you currently think it is?In post 416, alimdia wrote:Also I think theres one scum in the neighbourhood
Also I said in the neighbourhood 'if anyone of us dies, the other 2 should out each other since theres likely a scum left', and guess what? All 3 of us are still alive.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Quite low, and the fact that you didn't talk at all in there means I can't read you. It's very telling what people say in a neighbourhood instead of a masonry.In post 442, Wake1 wrote:
So by that logic when I flip Town and if Aero flips Town, then we should lynch you for being Scum?In post 436, alimdia wrote:
It could be wake simply because he just never talked in it. But I'm not sure if thats because he's afraid of not acting like a 'mason' like a town neighbour would, or just because he's afk as shit.In post 419, Sujimichi wrote:
Who do you currently think it is?In post 416, alimdia wrote:Also I think theres one scum in the neighbourhood
Also I said in the neighbourhood 'if anyone of us dies, the other 2 should out each other since theres likely a scum left', and guess what? All 3 of us are still alive.
There's always the possibility of all three of us being Town, you know.
I was trying to avoid clues to what stone I'm linked to, though I now see that effort was futileIn post 480, Zenith wrote:Still waiting for Dongfish, Blatant Scum, and Aeronaut. Last one to participate earns a frowny face sticker. x,x
I don't mind the redaction.
That said, I'm more curious about the reason for the redaction than I am about what was redacted. If you don't mind sharing, is there any particular reason you chose to redact?
Why?In post 490, Zenith wrote:
At the least, if I'm correct then you don't seem to be scum.In post 486, Blatant Scum wrote:How did I manage to sneak into town core?
Eve is town.In post 489, Aeronaut wrote:I'll be around tonight to see what's going on here, but for now
VOTE: Eve- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Just leaving this here...In post 478, Eve wrote:ah i see well i'm fine to vote warrior today and then the other one tomorrow - scum PT shouldn't be as useful to them with one of their members down and we can power everyone up once which might be good for info and claiming later
VOTE: Warrior
In post 475, Blatant Scum wrote:In post 404, jjh927 wrote:Role:
Level-Based Rolestopper: Once per night, you may target a player.If their role has a stone associated with it, and its path level is equal to or higher than the current cycle number, their night actions cannot fail and they will be protected from one nightkill.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
You hit the nail on the headIn post 502, Sujimichi wrote:
I believe that he is showing that contrary to what Blatant Scum stated is his assumptions based on dead players' roles and his own role, there are circumstances where a high path level is beneficial for town. The example quoted shows that popsofctown's role would be able to protect a player if their associated stone had a level equal to or higher than the current cycle (I am assuming this means phase). For example, a Thief Stone level of 2 would allow popsofctown's role to work on players associated with the Thief Stone during Night 1 (the second cycle/phase).In post 496, gobbledygook wrote:
I’m not getting the implication you’re trying to draw.In post 494, alimdia wrote:
Just leaving this here...In post 478, Eve wrote:ah i see well i'm fine to vote warrior today and then the other one tomorrow - scum PT shouldn't be as useful to them with one of their members down and we can power everyone up once which might be good for info and claiming later
VOTE: Warrior
In post 475, Blatant Scum wrote:In post 404, jjh927 wrote:Role:
Level-Based Rolestopper: Once per night, you may target a player.If their role has a stone associated with it, and its path level is equal to or higher than the current cycle number, their night actions cannot fail and they will be protected from one nightkill.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
In post 514, alimdia wrote:Dong I highly recommend you read the whole thing while putting your thoughts on a notepad++ or something, because most of what you are commenting on.... will be made redundant shortly.
and so we don't get the thread flooded with catch up posts that aren't important- alimdia
-
alimdia
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Sorry but er... theres this thing called "There has been new posts made since you last posted". Not skimming those is second only to my disbelief that you didn't read flips.In post 557, wrong fish wrote:
You arent the arbiter of whats important or not, you could always fuck off while i do this and come back to read my posts in one go, or you know post at me while im not paying attention to newer posts because thats a thing that works. Way to set expectations.In post 517, alimdia wrote:In post 514, alimdia wrote:Dong I highly recommend you read the whole thing while putting your thoughts on a notepad++ or something, because most of what you are commenting on.... will be made redundant shortly.
and so we don't get the thread flooded with catch up posts that aren't important
er yea no, takes 1 minute to read flips, and you spent way more than that 'catching up'.In post 559, wrong fish wrote:
Legit didnt read, ask Dong when he shows up, hes even further behind than i am now.In post 525, alimdia wrote:99% sure Dongfish is faking not having read day 1 lynch/night 1 flips before this 'catch up'. Thats literally impossible.
Me and TD SvS when TD already flipped town?
Trying to fake a town slip? Not on my watch.
I feel like you haven't been paying attention..... Eve was joking about us 3 being in a neighbourhood for a long time in day 1. My crackpot theory (Which I posted before) was that you were in a scum PT with her and you told her about our neighbourhood, which she then used as a joke. Though now that I think about it, Aero could have leaked it too.In post 562, Wake1 wrote:
Let me stop both of you.In post 547, wrong fish wrote:
Dont you think that would indicate that someone had more knowledge that they should have? How would eve know wake was in a neighborhood?In post 414, alimdia wrote:Hence also my skittish response to Eve claiming to being in a neighbourhood with Wake and I
Did she know I was in a Neighborhood before I posted about it?
If so then either there's another NH connected to ours OR one of the 3 in here are Scum. I would see Eve hanged today if she knew I was in a NH before any of us Neighbors said anything about it.- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Anyway pushing fish today after the stone gets selected, because all his catch up posts are just trying to show that he is doing something.
1) looking at flips takes 1 minute
2) making lots of posts makes it seem like he's doing stuff, when actually 50% of them are fluff, 30% of them are irrelevant already (percentages made up)
@Zenith.... will get to you later- alimdia
-
alimdia Mafia Scum
- alimdia
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I'm not sure what prompted this claim. Him saying you're apocalyse?In post 573, gobbledygook wrote:My role is fairly complicated. It is a toolbox. I have a 1-shot commuter ability that I can use independent of stone. I did not use it last night in case a vig or cop used their power on me because i hammered town. If it had been a scum flip, i would have used my commuter ability. My role does have something sweet but that requires Mage level 3. The lower mage levels do have other niche-useful things though.
Hard agree.In post 574, Sujimichi wrote:
Does wooden mean mafia? Because then the answer to your second question is "yes."In post 571, gobbledygook wrote:What makes you think I’m wooden? Would a wooden player hammer someone without a claim?
Also, I do not agree with Zenith's request now that everything has transpired. I do not believe that flavor alone will be useful in sorting a player's alignment and could actually serve as a distraction.
for sure lol.In post 575, Blatant Scum wrote:I bet this is not what JJH intended.
I believe he had to be raging while saw that question.
nani?In post 578, Blatant Scum wrote:By the way, there is a role blocker here.
NANI?In post 581, Blatant Scum wrote:Talking about vigs.
@Eve, can you shoot without Thief Rune?
I can give you 1-shot BP, but only if we choose Warrior stone.
I redacted thief since you know.... thief stone.In post 586, Zenith wrote:@Sujimichi
I also find the redactions interesting, particularly the thief redaction.
But yea I'm not trying to argue that mod names alone like Sneak Tools, Localised Thieves Guild Jobs, Apocalypse, etc are scummy because of flavor. Hell as a Cthulhu oracle know firsthand that even if a mod name sounds evil, it's not AI.
However, looking at a mod description can give a rough idea of what kind of power we are looking at, which can be used for setup spec.
@Blatant Scum
Ok, I see what you mean by titles.
I'm not sure about multiple clears though. Let's say I ask if goons (and specify afterward that by goons I mean the title) are aligned with town. If some are and some aren't, what would the mod answer? Yes no? Hmm.. Although if they are all aligned together then I think it could work for multiple clears or guiltys.
But then I googled Localised Guild Jobs skyrim and the only things that popped up were localised thieves guild jobs, so I was like lmao - alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia
- alimdia