Micro 914: CultD3 (Over)
Forum rules
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
GODDAMMIT IT I ROLLED TOWN AND CULT WINS THIS 80% OF THE TIME
VOTE: Farkran
LET'S GET THIS OVER WITH- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Yes, and it has very interesting implications for leader!hunting when you think someone's been recruited, but that's irrelevant till day 2.In post 17, Kanna wrote:Real question; so we HAVE to lynch the cult leader right? Otherwise scum keep cropping up?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
ELABORATEIn post 18, Farkran wrote:Tone of his post, was expecting exactly that.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
ALSOIn post 20, Hectic wrote:
Yes, and it has very interesting implications for leader!hunting when you think someone's been recruited, but that's irrelevant till day 2.In post 17, Kanna wrote:Real question; so we HAVE to lynch the cult leader right? Otherwise scum keep cropping up?
The other cultist will sometimes act like a jester just to save their leader, especially on day 1/2- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Kanna's new, and sh0s is a main unless he has something he'd like to tell me???
Does anyone have any theories for who Not A Korina Alt could be?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
hehaheheHEAHAHEHAHAIn post 33, Kanna wrote:In post 24, Hectic wrote:
ALSOIn post 20, Hectic wrote:
Yes, and it has very interesting implications for leader!hunting when you think someone's been recruited, but that's irrelevant till day 2.In post 17, Kanna wrote:Real question; so we HAVE to lynch the cult leader right? Otherwise scum keep cropping up?
The other cultist will sometimes act like a jester just to save their leader, especially on day 1/2Spoiler:
I'M NO DIRTY CULTIST
THIS IS JUST MY PROCESS- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Someone who has an insane streak of games in ALWAYS rolling cult leaderIn post 32, Kanna wrote:Who is Dr Drew?? please
I get the Jangle vote now- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
that's... a VERY good point actuallyIn post 43, Null Vote wrote:Not_Cult Leader probably wants to instant hammer L-1 towns, right?
intent to put Farkran on L-1
NO LYNCH IS EITHER TOWN OR CULT LEADER- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
PROBABLY TOWN THOUGH
i think not mentioning that outweighs the towncred for mentioning it as the leader
also - LOVING the two wagons we got so far- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
FARKRAN
before we move on you NEED to clarify - WHY did you think it was a good idea to claim VT earlier?
i've liked your play other than that claim- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
THIS IS ACCEPTABLE
Kanna's a very slight townlean so far. Poyzin's entrance seems to be NAI forreasons, but I WANNA HEAR MORE FROM YOU BECAUSE YOU'RE AMAZING, POYZIN
I haven't liked what "Korina" chose to comment on when there were other more interesting things, but I agree his tone is very different to last time I played with him where he actually rolled cult
Bingle... i need to see more
SH0S
VOTE: sh0s- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
you think scum are more likely to put someone on L-1?In post 83, Not A Korina Alt wrote:That there's likely one scum on each of the wagons. The fact nobody really got to L-1 makes me think both scum were on either you or NL, or split, like I said. I wanted to RVS NL since the start for the reason of him making a shitty joke about no-lynch not being an option.
NOT FOLLOWING YOUR LOGIC, KORINA??????
EXPANDIn post 83, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Also, I still wanna powerlynch Bingle. Bingle shouldn't be allowed to survive to MyLo IMO.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Oh wow, I didn't realise someone had glued down my CAPS LOCK KEY GODDAMMIT THERE IT GOES AGAIN HAng on there we go I fixed it. Sorry.In post 95, Poyzin wrote:
Awww, you've inspired me! I'd recommend getting a better keyboard though so you don't accidentally hit the caps lock button as many times as you have. I'm getting shady vibes from "no lynch" the player, and the cult leader claim out of the gate left me with a bad taste in my mouth. I mean, it obviously was a joke because you don't simply claim to be the leader of the anti-town faction. ...but that's the thing... For some reason I'm feeling that this was just a really risky scum play, to say that to appear as town by making such a blatantly false joke.In post 82, Hectic wrote:but I WANNA HEAR MORE FROM YOU BECAUSE YOU'RE AMAZING, POYZIN
Somebody please talk some sense into me because this is definitely unreasonable... right?
I'd read the No lynch (who I am now nicknaming Nolly) claiming cult leader as completely NAI; I wouldn't read into it if I were you. What do you think of sh0s putting Nolly on L-1 in 69?
Also, let me know what you think of Farkran's logic of claiming VT in 81.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
In post 101, Bingle wrote:I think it’s vaguely for the best if UTs claim D1. If we have a UT massclaim our EV shoots way up and there’s nothing scum can do to stop it. OTOH, if scum claims UT they will be found by any other or claim and both cultists have to claim.Is that so scum can't claim UT in the future after recruiting other town PRs?
BRILLIANT.
Unkillable ICs would be nice to have honestly. But does the roleblocker work on unrecruitables?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
As far as I can tell, they can't be roleblocked and they actually seem a lot stronger than the other PR combinations, since they're so good for PoE when you get to Lylo (which they always will).
I don't think they should claim today, since in order for 2 cultists to pull off a double fakeclaim as 2 UTs, they would need to have recruited BOTH town PRs. So we definitely don't need to out any possible UTs on day 1; let cult have the potential of failing their recruit.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
If the UTs exist, they can just claim tomorrow with no harm after they've possibly blocked a recruit. There's no setup with just 1 UT, so the cultists can't fakeclaim double UT before day 3, since they can only do that if they've recruited both PRs. Hope that makes sense.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Therefore, we mass claim not UT on DAY 2 to prevent that, rather than day 1.
There's no harm in waiting a day before doing so for the reasons I've already given.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
As far as I can tell, it was optimal to mass claim tomorrow rather than today because of the above, but it's too late for that now. I didn't realise Bingle had already claimed also, I thought his "not UT" was correcting his previous post.In post 115, Hectic wrote:If the UTs exist, they can just claim tomorrow with no harm after they've possibly blocked a recruit. There's no setup with just 1 UT, so the cultists can't fakeclaim double UT before day 3, since they can only do that if they've recruited both PRs. Hope that makes sense.
I'm also Not UT.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
SH0S YOU'RE C0NFUSED
VOTE: Salamence
Hey, Salsa, what's your opinion of Bungle pushing massclaiming not UT, and do you think it was put forward with good intentions?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
@Farkran: I see what you mean there, I hadn't considered the scenario where cult claim double UT while knowing there are other PRs that WILL counterclaim them. This is more fine then.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Lul, Kanna's been a UTR in every game I've played in. Kanna, what's your opinion of Korina's read on Poyzin's recent post, and do you agree/disagree?
ALSO
I think we should move out of the setup spec. Anyone who hasn't already claimed not UT should do so now, otherwise, I'm seeing any UT claims on day 2 onward as scumclaims.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
You're joking, right?In post 153, shos wrote:
btw if anyone is a UT they should claim non-UT too, imoIn post 151, Hectic wrote:I think we should move out of the setup spec. Anyone who hasn't already claimed not UT should do so now, otherwise, I'm seeing any UT claims on day 2 onward as scumclaims.
Please do not lie here, it defeats the whole purpose of the massclaim, and do not be surprised if you claim UT later and aren't believed by anyone if you choose to do this. Lying here gives scum an opportunity to fakeclaim later while saying "oh, I lied at the time to gambit because I wanted scum to recruit me."
I repeat: A UT claim from day 2 onwards is a scum claim.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
It's too late now though, enough people have claimed not-UT for scum to recruit between them; it's better if we finish what we started now rather than give scum the opportunity of fake claiming day 2.
Look at the setup table, sh0s, particularly at the rows in column C with 1 PR and 1 VT. If scum recruit that PR, they can claim double UT with no consequence on day 2 if we're in either of those setups.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Only this game.In post 167, Bingle wrote:
Have you played with Kanna scum?In post 151, Hectic wrote:Lul, Kanna's been a UTR in every game I've played in.
AM I RIGHT, KANNA?
Actually, could I hear your read on Bengle so far?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Nolly, does "Not Townread" equate to Null?
Korina, why do you consider it scummy for someone to not call you Korina? As far as I can tell, people were playing along with your gimmick of obviously not being Korina.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
It depends on the player. Last time I played a cultist setup, the cult leader played very passively and tried to stay out of the spotlight.In post 178, Kanna wrote:Also, but don't you guys think the cult leader is probably trying to seem townie rn? Lurker/not advancing conversation more likely cultists- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Uhh, definitely not after a quick ISO skim of Egix from my recent newbie with him.In post 194, Farkran wrote:Oh wait. Nolynch is egix.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
If we're all doing reads lists, I've got a townread on Farkran, townleans on Nolly, Bongle. Korina confuses me, but I townread his tone. I'm undecided on Kanna; need to see more. Sh0s, Poyzin, and Salsa have most potential for cult right now.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Lul, people get away with far worse.In post 206, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Also, I'm about to get off for the night before I start cursing some more and/or get banned for it.
Let me know why you townread Kanna when you have the time.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Reasoning for this?In post 152, shos wrote:I'm gonna go ahead and call the not korina alt town based on the long series of posts in page 6. First townread is first- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Nolly, let me tell you something:In post 245, Null Vote wrote:People though I was on L-1 & I was not hammered -> scum was on my wagoon.
Any competent scum would double and triple check the votes before hammering someone if they thought they were on L-1. I instantly checked and knew it wasn't L-1 for one.
It's naive thinking to assume there's definitely 1 in 3 scum in your wagon just because sh0s put a fake L-1 out.
@sh0s: Was the fake L-1 intentional or not?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Wait, what.In post 172, Null Vote wrote:Not A Korina Alt: Firstly, I don't like that her name and posts say two different things. I am not sure which one to trust. Well, it's NAI I guess.
IS THIS A SERIOUS READ, NOLLY?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Nolly, all your posts about Not Korina being Korina, and female dogs, are in jest, correct?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
And why exactly are you not providing reasoning on Kanna and I being town? Even loose uncertain thoughts are fine.In post 241, Poyzin wrote:
This is not an excuse, this is simply admitting that I haven’t been very helpful in terms of reads as I don’t have any posts talking about my own. Hectic and Kanna I feel are town, but that isn’t helpful in itself if I don’t provide any evidence for my reasoning, which I haven’t yet done.In post 240, Poyzin wrote:3) That is the only read I have thus far stated, yes. I don’t like talking about null reads, and the best argument I’ve read about a lynch candidate is Korina’s points on ”no łynch”.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
I like this. I think it's NAI for Farkran to tryhard/explain his thought process to look like town, but Kanna picking up on this is a good sign.In post 214, Kanna wrote:Top tier are naturally townie imo,
Farkran is townie, but I feel like it's more of a ~conscious~ townie- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
What would you be doing right now if you were the cult leader?In post 263, Not A Korina Alt wrote:If you wanna see Scum!Me, look at Newbie 1949. If you wanna know what I know to be Scum!Me, ask.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Nolly, why did you sheep Farkran in the above post considering-In post 225, Null Vote wrote:
VOTE: poyzinIn post 220, Farkran wrote:@Nolynch are you willing to vote poyzin with me? I really don't like those kind of prodges
you hold this opinion of him in your reads list?In post 172, Null Vote wrote:Farkran:I have already played with him one game under my alt and I am very paranoid of him. Too towny to be town. I need to check out scum games of his before making a read here.
And what was your read on Poyzin at that point?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
DISAGREEIn post 303, Farkran wrote:Shos feels a bit better than he did early in the game.
Sh0s feels off to me for several reasons. His early play was having a strong opinion and debating about something stupid, which gives him townie points in theory for genuinity, but is something which is much easier to fake for scum. Plus, I just don't understand the reasoning he was going about here:
Seems shallow to scumread Bangle based on him openly suggesting what he things is an anti-town strategy as a cultist. Scum very rarely push what they know is an anti-town strat with the intention of pushing it through in my experience.In post 116, shos wrote:
VOTE: BingleIn post 101, Bingle wrote:I think it’s vaguely for the best if UTs claim D1. If we have a UT massclaim our EV shoots way up and there’s nothing scum can do to stop it. OTOH, if scum claims UT they will be found by any other or claim and both cultists have to claim.
I think this is the first talk worthy thing in the game. Such claim would really be stupid for cult as that would put them in a 1v1 with a real UT. It makes all sorts of sense that if scum ever come to claim, they'll claim VT or a PR to draw PRs out or something. Therefore, this post is, most likely, coming from a cultist which is not the cult leader.
He improved a little after that as he started throwing some reads out.
But then this post comes along. If you lynch cult leader day 1, you win in any of the setups. Because all PRs claim the next day. If there's a counterclaim, you lynch all PRs and win. If there's no counterclaim, you lynch everyone but the PRs and win. The Cop + VT setup is fine as well, even if there's only 1 PR, since that PR checks people each night. The Jailkeeper + VT setup is the only one that isn't an autowin I thinkIn post 289, shos wrote:Question
If we have col A or C, then basically we just have to Lynch the leader and town can't lose?
Reason I'm saying all this is that it shows sh0s didn't put a lot of thought into the question he was asking. Recently, I've been noticing these kinda helpful looking questions thrown out a lot more often from scum than town, while not attempting to think/answer it themselves.
@Pedit: Thoughts, sh0s?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Isn't daytalk assumed in games nowadays? I don't remember the last time I saw a game without daytalk for scum.In post 326, shos wrote:I simply missed the daytalk thing. Assume I didn't know and reread that, it'll make much more sense lol- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Preemptive prod recieved and treasured. Was busy yesterday; I'll get to this later today.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
I have returned.
@Kerset: I believe you need to replace Salamence with ObviousScum in the most recent VC. Thanks and keep up the great work!
Done!Last edited by Kerset on Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
sh0s sh0s sh0s
I'm gonna do some research and check this daytalk case.
ObviousScum has one of the worst openings I've ever seen. The RVS vote at this stage putting someone on L-1in this setup, and then that proposition... We don't even need to discuss that strat though, because it defeats the purpose of playing the game and is anti-fun. I was slightly surprised to find no rule in this game's rule-set of this sort:"Play to your current win condition."
I get you think you might be drawing out a cultist to claim, but that's obviously not happening because no one here is braindead. If it was a joke, I give it a 6/10. Have you read anything yet?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
We don't get to actually play the game? I don't know about you, but I play mafia for fun first, and to win second.In post 393, ObviousScum wrote:It's a game, we can choose how to play it. The setup allows for 7/9 people to win with the cult if we play it correctly starting day 1. I think executing a joint win, that allows for up to 8/9 to possibly win depending on the setup configuration, actually sounds pretty fun. It's like having a guaranteed town victory in a 7-2 setup, with the perk that this way we also get to summon cthulhu! What's not to like?- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
I'm feeling pretty damn good about sh0s!cult, I think. I don't know why you'd view him as normal cultist more over CL; different players have different ways of playing CL to whoever said that. Maybe fake town-slipping and being strongly opinionated in early setup spec is sh0s' way of playing it.
@sh0s: You moderated a game here before your hiatus, and use daytalk, and don't mention it as a particularly special thing. It's not written standalone in your rules, and you don't remind scum they can daytalk in either of the mafia PTs. Gives me the impression that you know it's a given, and doesn't need mentioning. - Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Hectic