Micro 914: CultD3 (Over)
Forum rules
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Hello there!
I see that salamence really wanted a rematch, lol. Good luck with that!
Also kerset you betrayed me i wished i could bribe you into giving me a nice ability but instead this is the very first time, in all of my mafia career, that i rolled VT. Even before joining this site, i always rolled PR, 3p or scum.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Tone of his post, was expecting exactly that. I have meta credit for salamence. Was also a mild RT to see who would pick up.In post 16, Kanna wrote:
Why though?In post 10, Farkran wrote:Always the same movie lol
VOTE: shos is the scummiest for opportunism weight buti didn't like hectic either
Salamence is town in this game
You are town too by the wayFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I have recently played against scum!sala where he deathtunneled me first, then slipped about some game mechanics that i caught up and i got him lynched for that, so he swore some sort of vengeance on me. I expected him to resume it in this game, but he would probably have been over-aware if he were scum. I call him town.In post 21, Hectic wrote:
ELABORATEIn post 18, Farkran wrote:Tone of his post, was expecting exactly that.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Yeah i'm vt
Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
It was the correct thing to do at the time
Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Hi jingle, i know your main but i have never played with you, glad to get a first timeIn post 30, Bingle wrote:I’m a jingle alt designed solely to keep my active ego and bookmark threads more readable.
And to please fakegod.
Dr. Drew is always cult leader, more votes please.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Alas, don't know you, unless that one is also an alt.In post 49, Null Vote wrote:In post 2175, Voted wrote:/in D3 cultIn post 2176, Voted wrote:/out D3 cultI wonder whos alt am I.
Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
in b4 no-lynch replaces no lynchIn post 62, Not A Korina Alt wrote:VOTE: no lynch
Hi yes, even though I'm totally not the creator of the setup, I can tell you your gimmick doesn't work. Y'see, not me totally specified "no-lynch" not "no lynch", therefore you can be lynched, sorry about that.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
What's wrong with that?In post 66, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Also why tf was Fark at L-2 already?
You put no lynch at L-2 a couple posts above.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
And why is that relevant? No lynch reached L-1 during page 3. What do you make of that?In post 73, Not A Korina Alt wrote:@fark Because the L-2 happened before page 3.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
You can post a readlist, and explain who do you think is cult, and why. That would be useful for me.In post 57, Poyzin wrote:VOTE: Bingle
Hey there! This is my (second) game here on mafiascum, and am looking forward to this just as much as the first! Let me know if there's anything I can do for anybody right now.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
My readlist so far:
TOWN
Kanna
Korina
Salamence
Nolynch
Bingle
Hectic
Poyzin
Shos
SCUM
Shos pings me as very sheepy and opportunistic so far. B
Poyzin introduction is by the manual "hi, i am scum and want to look town"
On the other hand i liked kanna, he can be town for now.
All reads are weak, non-detailed ones are even weaker.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Good motive to move out from rvs and start talking about something useful, reaction test to everyone who would pick it up. I liked kanna doing so, your reaction sounded lackluster but the fact that you insisted now looks solvy, so i think you are now >rand town for the time being.In post 80, Hectic wrote:FARKRAN
before we move on you NEED to clarify - WHY did you think it was a good idea to claim VT earlier?
i've liked your play other than that claim
I didn't like other people who ignored me, but among them, i liked korina tone. I'm particularly sus of poyzin and shos at the moment. Not really fond of Bingle either, but i'll allow him to speak more.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Which of my reads sounded TMI?In post 99, Kanna wrote:I’m getting maybe low cult leader vibes from Fark cause on the outside, they seem quite townie, but some of their reads were kind of tmi imo and Poyzin is a newbie so I didn’t like that read of themFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Check my metaIn post 109, Kanna wrote:Maybe the readlist? Could be just me but I’m struggling to find AI stuff so it seems weird how can already make a readlistFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I kinda support this in this setup. Already claimed non ut.In post 101, Bingle wrote:I think it’s vaguely for the best if UTs claim D1. If we have a UT massclaim our EV shoots way up and there’s nothing scum can do to stop it. OTOH, if scum claims UT they will be found by any other or claim and both cultists have to claim.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
It's not unplausible, but i am with hectic saying that is NAI. Don't you have any other read based on what happened so far?In post 95, Poyzin wrote:
Awww, you've inspired me! I'd recommend getting a better keyboard though so you don't accidentally hit the caps lock button as many times as you have. I'm getting shady vibes from "no lynch" the player, and the cult leader claim out of the gate left me with a bad taste in my mouth. I mean, it obviously was a joke because you don't simply claim to be the leader of the anti-town faction. ...but that's the thing... For some reason I'm feeling that this was just a really risky scum play, to say that to appear as town by making such a blatantly false joke.In post 82, Hectic wrote:but I WANNA HEAR MORE FROM YOU BECAUSE YOU'RE AMAZING, POYZIN
Somebody please talk some sense into me because this is definitely unreasonable... right?Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Sorry how is that post scum indicative for bingle? Please lead me to understand your train of thoughts.In post 116, shos wrote:
VOTE: BingleIn post 101, Bingle wrote:I think it’s vaguely for the best if UTs claim D1. If we have a UT massclaim our EV shoots way up and there’s nothing scum can do to stop it. OTOH, if scum claims UT they will be found by any other or claim and both cultists have to claim.
I think this is the first talk worthy thing in the game. Such claim would really be stupid for cult as that would put them in a 1v1 with a real UT. It makes all sorts of sense that if scum ever come to claim, they'll claim VT or a PR to draw PRs out or something. Therefore, this post is, most likely, coming from a cultist which is not the cult leader.
From what i read here, you are voting bingle for assuming cult would counterclaim a claimed UT. Why would they? If UTs exist, counterclaiming them would give town MORE ICs rather than less, because an outed non-leader cult could be used as an anti-IC to lock cult into being unable to recruit more, since they are capped to 3 living cult players. Once the leader is found, then we can proceed to lynch cultists.
The difference between mafia and cult is that mafia cannot replace their ranks but have no limits on their ability to remove threats - cult can replace their ranks, but they are limited to 3 and therefore they can only remove threats if the town allows them to. Day 1 is the best day to apply this method, because the cult only has 1 available recruit to cast wifom on town. From day 2 onwards, it gets worse.
Tell me, shos, where is the scum intent in Bingle promoting such a strategy? Worst case scenario it would lead to a wifom-based gamestate, but it's not scum indicative.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I'm sure that NOT KORINA can give an equally insighful analysisIn post 118, Null Vote wrote:
I don't think that Korina is in the playerpool.In post 113, Farkran wrote:I'd like to hear what korina has to say about it, being the best expert in cult -and this particular setup- hereFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I still don't understand how outing the UTs helps scum, even if everyone else claims VT. We get two ICs as opposed to... nothing? I would understand your concerns if cult weren't capped at 3 recruits, but... they are. Other PRs should never claim right now, i think we agree with that. UTs are different. Or why aren't they, in your opinion?In post 119, shos wrote:no no no no
His point in claiming is to either force scum into d1 1v1 which is bad for them, since it's either leader or possibly a PR if I remember the setup correctly, or just...ignore them and allow them to avoid a mis-recruit which is obviously pro town. What I say is that clearly cult will not CC, and are far more likely to fakeclaim VT when they dakeclaim, so this just helps scum.
Worst case scenario is even supremely worse, where there is no UT and scum know this and THEY claim UT thus "conftowning" themselves until PRs die in the game when the setup becomes clearer.
So, uh... why are you voting bingle again? Not interested in defending him right now, i think he is still =rand leader, but i am trying to understand your train of thoughts. What would you do if you were a cult leader?In post 119, shos wrote:Anyway, that is a bad bad idea, and suggesting it helps scum, and since the leader wouldn't want so much attention, this is probably not himFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Don't you think that massclaiming UTs on day 2 allows cult to counterclaim better? Suppose we do not claim d1, but instead we claim d2 (to reiterate: this is only about UTs, no other role should claim).In post 126, Hectic wrote:Therefore, we mass claim not UT on DAY 2 to prevent that, rather than day 1.
There's no harm in waiting a day before doing so for the reasons I've already given.
Player A: i am UT!
Player B: i am UT!
Player C: i am UT!
Player D: i am UT!
By day 2, cult will LIKELY have 3 members to work with, two of which are expendable. What do we do with those 4 claims? By doing that during day 1, we can control the damage done by wifom CCs. Either we do that d1, or we don't do that at all, imo. I support doing it though.
pedit: well, nevermindFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Updated readlist:
TOWN
Kanna
Hectic
Bingle
Shos
Korina
Salamence
Nolynch
Poyzin
SCUM
Moved Hectic, Bingle and Shos up for what looked like genuine setup spec. Setup spec by itself usually comes from town, debating on which is the best strategy is almost always TvT. I still like kanna the most.
Moved Salamence down for not contributing enough.
My current guess is that nolynch, poyzin or both can be used as solid wagon solves for today. The read on no lynch is mostly gut/tone based at this point, i... was pinged the wrong way by his interaction with the UTs argument. Poyzin on the other hand just looks like scum trying to skirt the gamestate until he can prey on a real wagon, i don't like that at all.
Waiting for korina.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
@korina
What else don't you like besides bingle being third place?
Also, on a first glance (with zero experience for this setup) i would think that you're wrong when saying that a non-UT claim paints a target on your back, and it does not surpass the benefit of having town ICs, but apparently there are no UTs so it makes no real difference right now.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
It isn't in my experience. By the way, you only engaged my logic rather than my reads - do you have any objection on those?In post 142, Null Vote wrote:
I disagree.In post 141, Farkran wrote:Setup spec by itself usually comes from town, debating on which is the best strategy is almost always TvT.
Mechanical discussions are the very easy for scum to engage with, while not moving the game forward. Mechanical talk is always NAI.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Currently: 7v2, say we lynch townIn post 165, Bingle wrote:Cult missing a recruit isn't really a big deal to them. They win the long game anyway. And let's be clear here: If we don't lynch cult today, tomorrow is LYLO.
Tomorrow: 5v3, cult is capped. Our lynch is irrelevant unless it's the leader
Day after: 4v3, lynch the leader or lose (shall i call this lylelo?)
By the way, i'd like to learn how do you analyze the gamestate and why does your analysis point to shos specifically.
From what i gathered in these 7 pages, i think shos and no lynch are pretty much coasting - whereas poyzin and salamence are lurking. All these slots are making no attempts at advancing a risky gamestate. Why did you single shos out of these four?Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I suppose you are not willing to tell me, or crumb to me who you are? From your tone and content i think you might come from the GIF jester game. Good for you to be paranoid of me.In post 172, Null Vote wrote:Farkran:I have already played with him one game under my alt and I am very paranoid of him. Too towny to be town. I need to check out scum games of his before making a read here.
By the way, it seems that we mostly agree in our reads, with a significant difference in kanna and, well, yourself. I'll check again.
Kanna, perhaps it's time you post a readlistFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I deduced Egix from the "we are dogs on the internet" reference + post 157. I checked Egix posts in the game we played together though and if this is egix he's way way way off meta, so... maybe it's not egix. Creature perhaps?In post 198, Hectic wrote:
Uhh, definitely not after a quick ISO skim of Egix from my recent newbie with him.In post 194, Farkran wrote:Oh wait. Nolynch is egix.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
So, we're now at page 10 and you chose to stop at page 8 to make this post, the only content in it being that you like korina for aggressively pushing a slot that you don't even consider scummy.In post 230, Poyzin wrote:I’m through page 8 and I’m liking Korina’s content. Personal reasons for voting for “no łynch” or no, it would not be wise for scum!Korina to show clear aggression towards another player. Admitting their bias and asking for time to calm down and reassess their reads wholisticly strikes me as passionate town that demonstrates self-awareness that they aren’t seeing the bigger picture at the time while making sure to return tomorrow with a clear head. Scum usually wouldn’t admit to having a personal bias for a lynch in my opinion, but not impossible.
There are so many wrong things in this post...
1) why did you stop two pages short of a full catchup?
2) why are you applying your reasoning to korina only?
3) is your only read so far a minor tone-based townlean?
4) what do you make of the two people currently voting you?Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I can definitely follow a logic that lead you to scumread nolynch. I kinda agree, for different reasons than yours though. For me, the thing that pings me about nolynch is that he isn't putting enough weight in his reads, and does rather engage different subjects. I have seen some players doing it as town though, and there is still a chance he's pushing you for pressure - but kinda doing it wrong. I like you reacting like that, but again, this could still be a TvT, TvS and even SvS world i need to explore more.In post 243, Not A Korina Alt wrote:If you do not see why I am scumreading No Lynch following that post, you are 100% cult in my eyes. I am apparently scum forrandomly voting him at the start of the game.Like cult would plan in their PT "Hey, I'm gonna RVS this guy and then go into actually hardcore scumreading them"Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
In post 247, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Ok, I'm going to try to explain this like you're five years old, since you don't understand this:
BEING ON L-1 DOES NOT EQUATE TO HAVING SCUM ON YOUR WAGON FOR A FACT. YOU CAN HAVE AN ALL-TOWN WAGON, OR A WAGON WITH SCUM BEING THE HAMMER VOTE. JUST BECAUSE YOU WERE ON L-1 AND NOT HAMMERED MEANS JACKSHIT.
These, on the other hand, are not good posts in response to that.In post 248, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Scum could've not been on for example. One scum could've been on, and realized it wasn't L-1. Both scum could've been on, but decided against it because it makes both of them obvious, etc.
While it is true that neither scum nor town would have hammered a L-1 player, thus the sentence from nolynch is bad logic (but not inherently scummy, because it is consistent with what town!nolynch would think), you have failed to include the scenario where nolynch is scum and therefore no scum is on the wagon because the scum is being targeted by the wagon itself. This feels weird, given that you claim to be almost 100% confident nolynch is scum - your answer should have been "THAT'S BECAUSE YOU ARE SCUM, YOU DUMBASS" or something like that.
I wonder if korina would be prone to scumslips like that. I'll take note of this.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
This, please.In post 254, Hectic wrote:
And why exactly are you not providing reasoning on Kanna and I being town? Even loose uncertain thoughts are fine.In post 241, Poyzin wrote:
This is not an excuse, this is simply admitting that I haven’t been very helpful in terms of reads as I don’t have any posts talking about my own. Hectic and Kanna I feel are town, but that isn’t helpful in itself if I don’t provide any evidence for my reasoning, which I haven’t yet done.In post 240, Poyzin wrote:3) That is the only read I have thus far stated, yes. I don’t like talking about null reads, and the best argument I’ve read about a lynch candidate is Korina’s points on ”no łynch”.
Also i don't really believe everyone besides those three are null for you. Content has been flowing through the last pages - even if you haven't determined the alignment of someone, you can't say they are completely null. There must be something that pinged you the right or the wrong way.
Poyzin as CL with Korina as cultist? Makes sense?Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Because of ... everything i said in my ISO about poyzin, and post 258 for korina. I don't think korina is the CL, i agree that CL wouldn't be this flashy. But any other cultist can take a hit, and even if that particular post is just a slight, potential scumslip, it would be poor play to ignore such things. It's not like scum would come out and say "oh right, i scumslipped, i need to die now /vote myself". It's not like i scumlocked them either, i just feel i am onto something.In post 274, Kanna wrote:@Farkran; why did you suggest poyzin CL and Korina cultist?Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Might check that later, but i assume that's not a cult game (being a newbie and all), so there may be very different behaviors appearing in here. Also, being aware of -past- selfmeta makes it more NAI than it should.In post 263, Not A Korina Alt wrote:If you wanna see Scum!Me, look at Newbie 1949. If you wanna know what I know to be Scum!Me, ask.
Post 269 is nice - would you say this is the best that town!you could do in this game? This question is not meant to belittle your play so far, just asking if you are sticking to what you said in the aforementioned post: being the towniest possible to get recruited later.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I agree generally speaking, but does not apply to d1. Also i'm not sure if the first cultist would act super towny - he needs to be viable as a lynch later -not obvscum, just viable- so being specifically null would be a nice asset.In post 277, Bingle wrote:
Nope. Cult is actively looking to townbloc at the moment. That's the point of cult. Find the most towny people you can and work well with them.In post 223, Null Vote wrote:
It should work on starting cultist and cult leader.In post 196, Bingle wrote:
That doesn't work at all in cult games, JSYK.In post 193, Null Vote wrote:Yes. I am good in doing townreads, so I just do townreads and then lynch scum via POE.
I have a different method which may be able to detect recruited.
Townblocking DOESN'T work in cult games, at all, which is like 70% of the reason cult games are so horrifically hard to win as town.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I admit i am tunneling at this point, but why would you only consider Hectic and Kanna for that specific reasoning? I mean, even in your quotes they are mostly talking about me and my posts. How i am not included in that specific reasoning? I could see disagreement bias since i am pushing you, but i'd like to ask you what makes me less town than kanna and hectic from your POV if you assume i am pushing "player x" instead of "poyzin".In post 278, Poyzin wrote:-snip-Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
1. Why not, though? Where's the harm in producing more content rather than less? How is it forced? Also, check my meta [cit.]In post 282, shos wrote:
I take issue with this post.In post 78, Farkran wrote:My readlist so far
1. because why would anyone really try to form a full readlist in p3 of D1 where half the people barely posted? Sorts of feels forced, even despite the last sentence
2. shos sheepy and opportunistic? Is this your first mafia game evar? is this forrealz?
3. "I liked kanna"? is that one of the detailed ones, really?
2. Your first and only non-RVS vote was post 116, out of setup spec which you later submitted to. Would you call that independent and protown? We both know that early d1 you push weak things, because there are no strong things to begin with. This is true for you, as is for everyone.
3. I talked about kanna earlierFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
If we lynch the CL d1, yes. If we lynch the CL later, technically town can be endgamed by having 2 cultists vs 2 UTs. I think. Actually the setup rules are ambiguous, they say "cult has to reach a majority", not "has to reach parity" which is the usual win condition for scum. I think it still works like that though.In post 290, shos wrote:Ebwop
If we have col A or C and row 3, then basically we just have to Lynch the leader and town can't lose?Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
He's not scumlocked, but he's my best guess for CL right now (wrt poyzin). I want more content, i want him to produce stuff that he can be accountable for. Because right now he is the slot that i'd feel most comfortable with associating with a prominent scum role, given the mindsed and content displayed. He fits with a lowkey profile which is dodging responsibilities, going for consensus reads rather than producing his own, not trying to engage the gamestate, you know the drill. This is scum by the manual, and until proven wrong i think he's my best guess for CL in this game.In post 298, Kanna wrote:
Remind me what your reasons are for Poyzin because I ISO’d you and the main reasons I found were about inactivity and prodging. Why Poyzin instead of Sala? I also don’t understand your tunnel on them at all; i’m paranoid you’re targeting them in bad faith. Agree about Korina not being CL thoughIn post 285, Farkran wrote:
Because of ... everything i said in my ISO about poyzin, and post 258 for korina. I don't think korina is the CL, i agree that CL wouldn't be this flashy. But any other cultist can take a hit, and even if that particular post is just a slight, potential scumslip, it would be poor play to ignore such things. It's not like scum would come out and say "oh right, i scumslipped, i need to die now /vote myself". It's not like i scumlocked them either, i just feel i am onto something.In post 274, Kanna wrote:@Farkran; why did you suggest poyzin CL and Korina cultist?
I wouldn't townlock anyone right now either, but i am much more willing to work with people like you, hectic and probably bingle for now. I would like to include korina, because i liked his early content, but honestly the experience level displayed and that specific post made me too much paranoid to trust his slot at the moment, so i will wait until i get more information. Shos feels a bit better than he did early in the game.
Wrt sala, i am... concerned, yes, but not particularly in a scummy way. I have meta with him, he was scum and i was town - in this game he's doing the exact opposite of what he was doing in the other. I am waiting for a couple specific events to happen before i try to push there, but right now i don't think he is cult leader.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Why do you do this when i just started feeling better about you?In post 308, shos wrote:
This post kinda gives me the hibbie-jibbiesIn post 129, Farkran wrote:
Don't you think that massclaiming UTs on day 2 allows cult to counterclaim better? Suppose we do not claim d1, but instead we claim d2 (to reiterate: this is only about UTs, no other role should claim).In post 126, Hectic wrote:Therefore, we mass claim not UT on DAY 2 to prevent that, rather than day 1.
There's no harm in waiting a day before doing so for the reasons I've already given.
Player A: i am UT!
Player B: i am UT!
Player C: i am UT!
Player D: i am UT!
By day 2, cult will LIKELY have 3 members to work with, two of which are expendable. What do we do with those 4 claims? By doing that during day 1, we can control the damage done by wifom CCs. Either we do that d1, or we don't do that at all, imo. I support doing it though.
pedit: well, nevermind
Usually such possible abuse of the game is thought out by scum, andthis kinda looks like scum are trying to let scum know what should be done in that case. Although, it DOES discuss a D2 action so they WILL have time to talk about it N1. I dunno, this setup spec seems far less interesting and might be a way to kill off time and look like you're putting effort into the game.
Let's leave falkran as nullscum for the while
Cult has daytalk. How does scum!farkran "try to let scum know what should be done" IN THE MAIN THREAD?
I mean... you seem to be forcing yourself to push on me by casting shade at every opportunity you get. This is just... a very bad, forced, reachy push on my slot.
Poyzin/shos? Would make sense with 284. Would make sense that cultist!shos tries mislynch me since i claimed VT and i would be a bad recruit for them.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
@mod: i didn't notice salamence has been way over his prod timer. Activity overview says more than 3 days.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I forgot to answer this during catchupIn post 305, Kanna wrote:@Farkran;what do you think about No Lynch?
Nolynch is... not entirely town, not entirely cultist, not entirely CL. He's not null in a literal sense, because i do have notes and thoughts about him, but i am trying to sort the interactions between him and poyzin/korina + shos now. Like, i think nolynch might be a relevant counterwagon to poyzin, but if i had to choose i'd choose to lynch poyzinFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
My issue with you now is that SOME paranoia and inquisitiveness makes sense and is a sane town trait. Trying to shade every post i make, on the other hand, is starting to look like you actually want to remove me at all costs, even when your reasoning has a wrong premise.In post 326, shos wrote:I simply missed the daytalk thing. Assume I didn't know and reread that, it'll make much more sense lol
Even if you genuinely forgot about daytalk, why was your first thought about me trying to inform my partners on what to do? You seem to be inductively placing bad faith in my content, rather than deducing scumminess from it.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Readlist v3
TOWN
Kanna
Hectic
Bingle
Korina
Salamence
Nolynch
Shos
Poyzin
SCUM
The only difference in placements from the previous readlist is shos moved back down to the scum area, but there is actually another difference - i am now confident enough on the green people that i will never lynch there today, and i strongly want to promote a lynch within the red people.
I feel there is a significant amount of agreement bias in pretty much all the presented reads so far, so i'd like to have a sanity check about the current gamestate. I have seen people taking hard stances (korina vs bingle and nolynch, bingle vs shos, hectic vs shos, farkran vs poyzin and now shos), and people who didn't - sometimes trying to form reads, sometimes not even that. I think it is time that everyone takes a stance and says who is his highest scumread, detailing his reasons. Or highest townreads and why you wouldn't lynch within them.
Personally i still have found no reason to remove my vote from poyzin, and the resistance displayed by slots such as shos makes me more confident about a red (purple?) flip there. I mean, i just read shos ISO and it seems that most of his content is based on either agreement bias or nothing at all. I had the impression he was doing better during the setup spec part several pages ago, but then he proceeded to shade both my previous readlist and my own setup-based strategy, in the meanwhile whiteknighting poyzin for ... no reason at all.
I think nolynch and one in {poyzin, shos} would be viable as the two main wagons for today - i will side with those voting the latter. If there is any objection to this procedure, please let me know whyFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
1. The only stances you have taken are out of agreement/disagreement bias or consensus biasIn post 339, shos wrote:I still don't manage to recall why you scumread me, btw
2. Trying to inductively shade my posts is scummy
If you have any hard stance you wish to share with us, it is now the moment to do so. Apparently you have parked your vote on bingle for disagreeing on setup talk. Explain why your vote is still there, or move it where you think it's useful.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Explain yourself to the classIn post 343, shos wrote:Honestly don't know if scum or stupid by bow
We want to hear moreFarkran is back poggers-Alisae - Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Farkran