Micro 914: CultD3 (Over)

Blatant Scum · Post Post #399 (isolation #0) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:43 pm

Disclaimer:

I will be off-meta in this game (I will, for example, be doing reads). Don't use information gathered in this game for reading my meta.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #400 (isolation #1) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:44 pm

In post 398, ObviousScum wrote:Don't worry Blatant, no one will interpret my vote as distancing! We got this

Who are you?
This is the first time I see you!
I totally don't share PT with you!

Blatant Scum · Post Post #410 (isolation #2) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:00 pm

In post 386, ObviousScum wrote:If we lynch the non-CL every single day aren't we basically guaranteed to have everyone but two be in the pool of winners?

Cult wins with the majority, not parity, so technically everyone but one person.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #411 (isolation #3) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:01 pm

In post 388, ObviousScum wrote:The biggest problem being 3A. Obviously this plan sucks for uncrecruitable townies (0-2 players) but other than that basically we can get everyone to win?

Conversely if we play conventionally, every single townie we mislynch is a townie that we're putting at risk of losing the game, when that's totally unnecessary.

Joint win is best for everyone except UTs right?

Guess why Bingle asked everyone to claim UT/ not UT.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #414 (isolation #4) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:04 pm

In post 401, Hectic wrote:
In post 399, Blatant Scum wrote:
Disclaimer:
I will be off-meta in this game (I will, for example, be doing reads). Don't use information gathered in this game for reading my meta.
Huh. Why'd you sub your main in?

Couldn't resist it after my co-cultist replaced as ObviousScum.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #415 (isolation #5) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:05 pm

In post 409, Farkran wrote:I don't think obvious scum is cult though. Silly entrance, but not scummy. There is merit in what he suggested, although i do not agree with him.

My entrance would look similar if replaced. As any role.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #418 (isolation #6) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:09 pm

In post 416, Farkran wrote:
In post 411, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 388, ObviousScum wrote:The biggest problem being 3A. Obviously this plan sucks for uncrecruitable townies (0-2 players) but other than that basically we can get everyone to win?

Conversely if we play conventionally, every single townie we mislynch is a townie that we're putting at risk of losing the game, when that's totally unnecessary.

Joint win is best for everyone except UTs right?
Guess why Bingle asked everyone to claim UT/ not UT.
Hmmm... you are not suggesting that Bingle thought about the same thing a newly replaced in player just laid out, unless they are partnered.

But if they are, why out this? It's obvious that, while being probably an optimal strategy for this specific setup, it's against the spirit of the game and for that reason alone at least half of the players (on average) would not agree to it. The only reasonable motive would be luring the cultist out. Maybe a poor motive, but trying does no harm.

I guess there are at least two players who would claim Cult Member after asked about it.
Am I right, Obv?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #420 (isolation #7) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:10 pm

People who town read Kanna: do you know her meta?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #423 (isolation #8) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:12 pm

Obvious, did you manage to fake some reads, or do you need me to help you in PT?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #425 (isolation #9) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:13 pm

(we are masons)

Blatant Scum · Post Post #431 (isolation #10) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:15 pm

Leaving {Farkran, ObviousScum, Blatant Scum, Bingle, Poyzin, shos} as potential CLs.
Where {Farkran, Bingle, ObviousScum} will be pretty much unreadable. Amazing.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #434 (isolation #11) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:18 pm

Shos keeps quoting my posts and claiming they are towny.
It makes me uneasy.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #435 (isolation #12) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:20 pm

In post 432, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Also, Blatant, if you're trying to get me to budge away from voting you, it's not working. Instead, I'm just wanting you to die even more.

Do you seriously think that I replaced into this game with my trolling account to make you, you, in particular, townread me?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #440 (isolation #13) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:25 pm

In post 438, ObviousScum wrote:Don't worry about it Farkran, that was meant for the other PT

This is not a PT neither.
Gosh, why did you come up with the idea to have 2 scum PTs again?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #441 (isolation #14) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:27 pm

In post 436, Farkran wrote:
In post 431, Blatant Scum wrote:Leaving {Farkran, ObviousScum, Blatant Scum, Bingle, Poyzin, shos} as potential CLs.
Where {Farkran, Bingle, ObviousScum} will be pretty much unreadable. Amazing.
Is this a follow up to something? Kanna and Korina are out that list, why? I feel like i am missing something

Sheeping. I agree that Korina is likely to not be CL for that rage outburst, I am sheeping Kanna TR.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #443 (isolation #15) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:32 pm

These 50 posts where her caps lock broke and she kept repeating that I am scum.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #444 (isolation #16) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:32 pm

In post 442, ObviousScum wrote:BS as town

Why?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #449 (isolation #17) » Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:29 pm

Blatant Scum · Post Post #479 (isolation #18) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 2:13 am

In post 455, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Can we kill Blatant today and Obvious tomorrow? I really don't like their posting thus far. It feels like to me they're actively playing jestery. I don't know if it's indicative of CL or not, but I'd like to kill them tomorrow.

In other words: let's policy lynch two players because of their playstyle. Yes, they don't have the highest CL credit of all players and yes, we likely lose if neither of them is CL, but anyway, let's do it!

Blatant Scum · Post Post #480 (isolation #19) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 2:18 am

In post 465, Kanna wrote:
In post 399, Blatant Scum wrote:
Disclaimer:
I will be off-meta in this game (I will, for example, be doing reads). Don't use information gathered in this game for reading my meta.
Haven't checked your meta yet, but is there a reason you're changing it + telling us you're changing it?

I am not telling it to you, I am telling it to people who would meta me later.
I don't want people from other games checking this game, finding out I was doing reads here and was town.
Then they would automatically assume that if I don't do any reads at all (which is this account meta), it means I am scum.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #482 (isolation #20) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 2:26 am

In post 462, Kanna wrote:I don't really know why I'm a UTR tbh but thanks @OS and BS; any reason other than sheeping?

You are "pushing the game forward" and "towny". Sheeping others make me ignore the paranoia I have about town leaders being a secret scum.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #483 (isolation #21) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 2:27 am

*displays emotions*

Blatant Scum · Post Post #491 (isolation #22) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:22 am

In post 455, Not A Korina Alt wrote:I don't know if it's indicative of CL or not

Blatant Scum · Post Post #500 (isolation #23) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:11 am

In post 498, Not A Korina Alt wrote:
In post 479, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 455, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Can we kill Blatant today and Obvious tomorrow? I really don't like their posting thus far. It feels like to me they're actively playing jestery. I don't know if it's indicative of CL or not, but I'd like to kill them tomorrow.
In other words: let's policy lynch two players because of their playstyle. Yes, they don't have the highest CL credit of all players and yes, we likely lose if neither of them is CL, but anyway, let's do it!
No, this is not a policy because of your playstyle. You and Obvious are acting like jesters and actively making the game unreadable—not to mention, your play will
undoubtedly
draw the tracker/cop onto whichever one of you survives tonight. In what universe does a townie decide to do this? None. In what universe does scum decide to do this? Many. Therefore, you are scum, and you must die. I'm not arguing this any further.

We lynch Blatant today, and Obvious tomorrow.

Why do you want to lynch a person with 5/7 probability of being

undoubtedly

checked by cop/ tracker tommorow?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #501 (isolation #24) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:13 am

In post 500, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 498, Not A Korina Alt wrote:
In post 479, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 455, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Can we kill Blatant today and Obvious tomorrow? I really don't like their posting thus far. It feels like to me they're actively playing jestery. I don't know if it's indicative of CL or not, but I'd like to kill them tomorrow.
In other words: let's policy lynch two players because of their playstyle. Yes, they don't have the highest CL credit of all players and yes, we likely lose if neither of them is CL, but anyway, let's do it!
No, this is not a policy because of your playstyle. You and Obvious are acting like jesters and actively making the game unreadable—not to mention, your play will
undoubtedly
draw the tracker/cop onto whichever one of you survives tonight. In what universe does a townie decide to do this? None. In what universe does scum decide to do this? Many. Therefore, you are scum, and you must die. I'm not arguing this any further.

We lynch Blatant today, and Obvious tomorrow.
Why do you want to lynch a person with 25/42 probability of being
undoubtedly
checked by cop/ tracker tommorow?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #502 (isolation #25) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:16 am

In post 498, Not A Korina Alt wrote: (...) You and Obvious are acting like jesters (...), your play will
undoubtedly
draw the tracker/cop onto whichever one of you survives tonight. (...) In what universe does scum decide to do this? Many. (...)

I am interested in seeing at least one of these universes.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #505 (isolation #26) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:19 am

Korina, if I and ObvScum were mod-confirmed town, who would you lynch today?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #507 (isolation #27) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:21 am

How about shos?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #510 (isolation #28) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:24 am

In post 503, Not A Korina Alt wrote:I have my personal reasons for wanting to lynch those being checked by cop/tracker, but also, it simplifies their play a lot. If I'm the cop, and I have two people I need to check, I will want one of them dead so I can see what they are without having to waste my night. Likewise, if I'm tracker, it means I don't have to waste a night—possibly not see the CL—and get a clear that way.

Pedit: Jingle is going to run an open where I'm a treestumped CL. You wanna see a world where scum plays jestery as fuck? Play/watch that game, because you're going to see exactly how I can derail a game as treestumped scum.

I mean, why would you, as a cop, want to see your last night target being lynched (if the target were town)?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #511 (isolation #29) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:24 am

In post 509, Not A Korina Alt wrote:
In post 380, Not A Korina Alt wrote: I went to go find my reads from a Jingle's game, and D1, I was scumreading shos, who was town at that point. I'm willing to operate under the assumption for today that shos is actually town, and me scumreading him means he's town.
No. shos lynch isn't happening today.

Why?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #520 (isolation #30) » Tue Jan 21, 2020 6:52 am

In post 512, Not A Korina Alt wrote:2) I believe shos is currently town

Why?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #654 (isolation #31) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:38 am

Just catching up.
Why is Bingle leading wagon?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #659 (isolation #32) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:49 am

In post 607, Hectic wrote:
In post 399, Blatant Scum wrote:
Disclaimer:
I will be off-meta in this game (I will, for example, be doing reads). Don't use information gathered in this game for reading my meta.
Why did you decide to make reads for this game?

To continue with No Łynch's meta.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #677 (isolation #33) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:59 am

Can we please don't lynch in the next few minutes?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #681 (isolation #34) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:02 am

UNVOTE:

Blatant Scum · Post Post #684 (isolation #35) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:07 am

shos - Neighbor x poy - Rolestopper ~ they are very likely not CL
Not Korina - Tracker

Shos didn't hammer Bingle while in L-1 and CCed with Bingle being L-1.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #686 (isolation #36) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:10 am

In post 589, Bingle wrote:I'm going to assume everyone's posted since claims, but if you have a CC do so now.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #689 (isolation #37) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:14 am

Actually, poyzin has high CL credits too. Don't lynch him today, though.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #695 (isolation #38) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:24 am

Why would Bingle - shos pair vote Kanna (kinda universal townread) instead of me (Not Korina is guaranteed to join on me, Farkran/ Poyzin are OK with my lynch)? I am much easier mislynch.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #698 (isolation #39) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:43 am

In post 696, Hectic wrote:sh0s is CCing here knowing we're gonna assume he's trying to "save" Bangle, to get the lynch through on him.

He could hammer. Bingle was L-1.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #720 (isolation #40) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:50 am

In post 705, ObviousScum wrote:Premise: two of the three are not cult right now.

Only one can become culted tonight

Fn targets someone
Rs on the tracker
Tracker on the fn

Fn message confirms fn did not start as cult
Tracker outs fn target before fn or recipient out

Fn confirms that fn did not start game as cult
Tracker result confirms tracker did not start game as cult

Two of the three are cult on d2 but at least we should know which began or did not begin as cult

I think we lynch outside the three for today

I then this is better than tracker going on rando because otherwise tracker result always ends up u reliable

Also none of the three are likely to be cl right now

FN is scum: can be CL who "greets" a townie by turning them into cultist. Penetrates right through both checks.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #721 (isolation #41) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:53 am

Why is Kanna cult leader?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #722 (isolation #42) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 8:09 am

VOTE: Kanna
Won't be here around DL so I will leave her as a potential wagon.
I think Bingle is town here. I am not sure since I have never played scum against him, but enough to consider wagoning someone else.
Don't lynch shos nor poy today.
Korina track whoever you think is CL.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #727 (isolation #43) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 9:18 am

In post 723, Farkran wrote:Catching up... what the hell happened to this game while i was at work?

Shos claimed FN.
Poy claimed rolestopper.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #728 (isolation #44) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 9:19 am

Actually, the order was the other way.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #738 (isolation #45) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 10:41 am

In post 729, Farkran wrote:
In post 643, shos wrote:
In post 557, Poyzin wrote:I’m the Town Rolestopper and I was trying to not attract too much attention. That didn’t work out well.
This is a false claim, I officially CC this
VOTE: Poyzin
Uh... i don't think i believe this counterclaim to be true. Korina claimed tracker and nobody else said anything until you pop up and claim FN, right after Bingle seems to be today's lynch? What are the chances that cult!poyzin claims rolestopper and only korina steps up to CONFIRM it rather than CC him.

I'll elaborate: if poyzin claim was false, the rest of the town still contains 2 PR. 8 people could step up and counterclaim him by being Jailkeeper, Friendly Neighbor or Rolestopper. Instead, everyone except shos and BS posted itt with korina confirming poyzin role and nothing else. The chances of shos being sincere are extremely low, or poyzin has been extremely lucky.

I don't know. I usually don't CC claims when I am VT.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #772 (isolation #46) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 11:38 am

In post 739, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Was poyzin at L-1 when he claimed or no?

Yes.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #773 (isolation #47) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 11:40 am

In post 772, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 739, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Was poyzin at L-1 when he claimed or no?
Yes.

Ahh, you ment poy. IDK.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #774 (isolation #48) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 11:40 am

In post 772, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 739, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Was poyzin at L-1 when he claimed or no?
Yes.

In post 773, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 772, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 739, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Was poyzin at L-1 when he claimed or no?
Yes.
Ahh, you ment poy. IDK.

Just pretend I never posted it, please.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #777 (isolation #49) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 11:47 am

In post 765, Not A Korina Alt wrote:@Shos, you're also on me tonight.

NO WAY!
You will get culted if shos is town!

Blatant Scum · Post Post #780 (isolation #50) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:14 pm

I believe that shos' biggest townread is shos.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #785 (isolation #51) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:41 pm

VOTE: shos

Blatant Scum · Post Post #789 (isolation #52) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:26 pm

In post 786, Farkran wrote:It's 11 hours to deadline. Any vote not aimed at lynching the CL is wasted, otherwise please enlighten me on why 736 is wrong.

Up to you to vote your highest CL candidate, but Korina can't be CL and Shos is the least likely to be CL among the others.

Bingle (with shos) focused on pushing Kanna instead of some easier target (me for example) -> shos is not cultist + Bingle CL (1)
Shos could hammer Bingle -> shos is not cultist + Bingle town (2)
(1)+(2) shos is not cultist (3)
Poy is very likely town because of that claim -> shos is cultist or CL (4)
(3)+(4) shos is CL.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #790 (isolation #53) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:27 pm

In post 788, Hectic wrote:What's up with that sh0s vote, Bla?

In post 722, Blatant Scum wrote:Don't lynch shos nor poy today.
Thought you agreed earlier.

Noone presented me (4) back then. I fully agree with (4).

Blatant Scum · Post Post #793 (isolation #54) » Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:39 pm

VOTE: Kanna

Blatant Scum · Post Post #833 (isolation #55) » Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:41 am

I think we should wait for Korina to share her result before lynching.
There is a chance her result could help us.
Also, it would be awesome to know shos' target.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #874 (isolation #56) » Sun Jan 26, 2020 1:07 pm

In post 843, ObviousScum wrote:I think the CL, which right now I'm inclined to think is Hectic > Fark, started with poy and recruited sho last night

He would recruit Korina, the most dangerous player for cult.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #886 (isolation #57) » Sun Jan 26, 2020 1:21 pm

In post 878, ObviousScum wrote:why would scum ever recruit korina n1

If shos is town, scum autoloses if CL is lynched (regardless of target) and no cultist is lynched. Korina is able to find CL.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #889 (isolation #58) » Sun Jan 26, 2020 1:25 pm

In post 885, Hectic wrote:
In post 793, Blatant Scum wrote:VOTE: Kanna
Why did you vote Kanna end of day yesterday, Bla?

I liked Bingle so I wanted to present a counterwagoon.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #971 (isolation #59) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 7:32 am

In post 908, shos wrote:sorry for the delay i'll be phoneposting soon. targeted nobody tonight

?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #972 (isolation #60) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 7:45 am

In post 967, Hectic wrote:For some reason, I'm a little low on motivation right now, but I did a quick skimread of Nolly/Bla, and I like him for CL still. He started the game off with the claiming CL and offering to recruit people thing, but he's lessened that over the game as it grows more risky. Also, a small wagon formed on him and he reacted with a reads list which I've never seen from the likes of Bla before. He usually never puts effort into reads like that, which does sometimes get him scumread, but since he was on an alt and we didn't know his meta, I can see CL!him making reads as an exception since he knows he'll probably be scumread otherwise. Being paranoid of Farkran and then sheeping him was also odd, and he went afk yesterday as soon as I asked him for some CL-reads. Haven't reread Farkran but will do that later today.

ISO Voted, I did reads.
I joined the game with Voted (since I wanted to have a game where I make reads), then decided to troll the mod and join as Nolly instead.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #973 (isolation #61) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 7:55 am

Possible CLs: {Farkran, ObviousScum, Hectic, Kanna, Poyzin, shos}
Farkran goes out because I don't think he would like to push my mislynch as CL.
Poyzin goes out because he claimed when Bingle was the leading wagoon. Also, his claim was risky.
Leaving {ObviousScum, Hectic, Kanna, shos}
If we lynch shos and he turns into rolecop, we know Kanna is town. Yes, Kanna could stay at home, but the chances are small.
VOTE: shos

Blatant Scum · Post Post #975 (isolation #62) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 8:11 am

Shos, why target nobody?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #976 (isolation #63) » Tue Jan 28, 2020 8:13 am

In post 974, shos wrote:I call BS.

Communication outside of the game is illegal.
You can't make a phone call with me.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1102 (isolation #64) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:04 am

In post 977, Hectic wrote:
In post 973, Blatant Scum wrote:Farkran goes out because I don't think he would like to push my mislynch as CL.
Why not? And aren't I pushing for your lynch too?

Not that strong as Falklands do.

@sh0s: Lul, you're confirmed, m8. You "forgot" to submit an action, and your opening posts today were scummy on their own anyway.
In post 829, shos wrote:VOTE: poyzin
I don't think I need to talk today at all
In what world do you think you don't need to "talk today at all" after forgetting to submit your action?
I said we shouldn't pay much mind to what you're saying... and here I am arguing with you. Well played tbh.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1103 (isolation #65) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:05 am

In post 978, shos wrote:
In post 973, Blatant Scum wrote:Possible CLs: {Farkran, ObviousScum, Hectic, Kanna, Poyzin, shos}
Farkran goes out because I don't think he would like to push my mislynch as CL.
Poyzin goes out because he claimed when Bingle was the leading wagoon. Also, his claim was risky.
Leaving {ObviousScum, Hectic, Kanna, shos}
If we lynch shos and he turns into rolecop, we know Kanna is town. Yes, Kanna could stay at home, but the chances are small.
VOTE: shos
The same thing can be said about me, and you voted me.

Which thing?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1104 (isolation #66) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:06 am

In post 979, Farkran wrote:Interactions between shos and BS do not make sense, really... BS, why is shos CL?
He is a possible CL. If he flips rolecop, it means that Kanna is also not a CL. That's why he is the best lynch.
Why am i not? Who do i push as mislynch if i am CL?
Me.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1105 (isolation #67) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:08 am

In post 982, ObviousScum wrote:
In post 431, Blatant Scum wrote:Leaving {Farkran, ObviousScum, Blatant Scum, Bingle, Poyzin, shos} as potential CLs.
Where {Farkran, Bingle, ObviousScum} will be pretty much unreadable. Amazing.
real talk tho what was this post again bs?

Complaining about current the player list.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1107 (isolation #68) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:17 am

In post 1004, Hectic wrote:DON'T LET SH0S DERAIL

Waiting on you, Bla. Obum, what's your read on me now?

CL
Kanna & shos

ObviousScum

Hectic
Farkran, Poyzin
not CL

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1108 (isolation #69) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:18 am

In post 1006, Farkran wrote:If i get to L-1, i will immediately selfhammer.

...

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1112 (isolation #70) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:25 am

In post 1067, Not A Korina Alt wrote:
In post 1025, shos wrote:
In post 1023, Kerset wrote:
Poyzin requested to be replaced.
Not A Korina Alt has been prodded.
Cultist & cultee.

Poyzin slot has to go. Korina slot will stay an openwolf forever.
Prod received. I don't care enough about the game at this point tbf. I wasn't culted, and I can't be culted, because I have said numerous time I would openwolf the fuck out of the setup. What part of openwolfing is me lurking doing? Nothing. If I'm cult here, I would be spamposting the fuck out of this game to confuse everyone.

Poyzin and shos should be ignored, nobody should listen to them.
Agree.
Let's lynch Blatant today, and win. And if Blatant flips CL, I'm going to fucking say I told you all, yet none of you listened. I'm waiting for a VC first.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1113 (isolation #71) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:29 am

In post 1106, ObviousScum wrote:Complaining... To who?

whom*

To everyone. Helps me to keep attention to the game.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1114 (isolation #72) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:31 am

In post 1110, ObviousScum wrote:Hmm if bs was cl would his reads list be better

I would probably recruit someone capable of doing reads and then ask them to post reads for me in scum PT and copy-pasted everything they would say.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1120 (isolation #73) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:35 am

In post 1117, ObviousScum wrote:
In post 1107, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 1004, Hectic wrote:DON'T LET SH0S DERAIL

Waiting on you, Bla. Obum, what's your read on me now?
CL
Kanna & shos

ObviousScum

Hectic
Farkran, Poyzin
not CL
maybe you did copy paste the list but thought it was upside down?

this looks like an upside down list

˙ǝlqᴉssod ʇou sᴉ ʇɐɥ┴

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1121 (isolation #74) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:38 am

¿lɐɯɹou oʇ ʞɔɐq ʇxǝʇ ǝɥʇ dᴉlɟ I op ʍoH

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1122 (isolation #75) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:41 am

˙˥Ɔ ǝɹǝʍ noʎ ɟᴉ ɥɔuʎlsᴉɯ ɐ pǝɥsnd oɥʍ ʎnƃ ǝɥʇ ǝq oʇ ʇuɐʍ noʎ ʞuᴉɥʇ ʇ,uop I ˙uʍoʇ ɯɐ I ˙ɥɔuʎl ʎɯ ƃuᴉɥsnd ʎlǝʌᴉssǝɹƃƃɐ ʎllɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ 'spuɐlʞlɐℲ 'ʎɐʍʎu∀

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1124 (isolation #76) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:51 am

˙ƃuᴉssǝɹƃoɹd ǝɯɐƃ ʎɹǝʌ sᴉ ǝH ˙Ɩ ʎɐp ɯoɹɟ ɯᴉɥ pɐǝɹuʍoʇ I

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1134 (isolation #77) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:50 am

¿ʞɔɐq ʇxǝʇ ɥʇ ɥɔʇᴉʍs oʇ ʍoH ˙snoᴉɹǝs ɯɐ I

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1284 (isolation #78) » Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:27 am

The game ended. I can finally add the post to my signature.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1291 (isolation #79) » Mon Feb 03, 2020 8:09 am

I also want to read it.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1292 (isolation #80) » Mon Feb 03, 2020 8:09 am

Why is it not being released?

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1296 (isolation #81) » Mon Feb 03, 2020 2:02 pm

I give permission.
I didn't use it anyway.

Blatant Scum · Post Post #1309 (isolation #82) » Tue Feb 04, 2020 3:17 am

I mean, if I culted anyone N1 and you lynched me D2, you could mechsolve the game.