Micro 914: CultD3 (Over)
Forum rules
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Why though?In post 10, Farkran wrote:Always the same movie lol
VOTE: shos is the scummiest for opportunism weight buti didn't like hectic either
Salamence is town in this game- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
In post 24, Hectic wrote:
ALSOIn post 20, Hectic wrote:
Yes, and it has very interesting implications for leader!hunting when you think someone's been recruited, but that's irrelevant till day 2.In post 17, Kanna wrote:Real question; so we HAVE to lynch the cult leader right? Otherwise scum keep cropping up?
The other cultist will sometimes act like a jester just to save their leader, especially on day 1/2Spoiler:- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
?
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Not really sure I buy this though; he only said 2 words and it wasn't that much of a risky move?In post 22, Farkran wrote:
I have recently played against scum!sala where he deathtunneled me first, then slipped about some game mechanics that i caught up and i got him lynched for that, so he swore some sort of vengeance on me. I expected him to resume it in this game, but he would probably have been over-aware if he were scum. I call him town.In post 21, Hectic wrote:
ELABORATEIn post 18, Farkran wrote:Tone of his post, was expecting exactly that.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
I strive to be recruited at the last minute and win.In post 63, Not A Korina Alt wrote:
Ok, I created this setup, so I know it better than anyone else: Yes and no. Cult can only have three living cultists at any time, so if they recruit tonight, they can't recruit unless we lynch a cultist. Ideally, we'd lynch the cult leader today, but as the maiden voyage demonstrated, it's possible for scum to still win with a cult lynch d1, and the leader being found early.In post 17, Kanna wrote:Real question; so we HAVE to lynch the cult leader right? Otherwise scum keep cropping up?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Why is this?In post 84, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Fark is also town btw. I'm calling it now.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Yeah it is too late; we should’ve discussed + agreed before we started claiming but I still think this seals the deal? ^ D2 isn’t reliable because there are setups with 1 PR and furthermore scum know what column we’re in so they’ll know if they’ve recruited the sole PR > from there it gets really ickyIn post 138, Bingle wrote:
In column 3 rows 1 and 2 there is only one PR. If the sole PR is recruited, then cult can literally have that PR and the CL claim UT and town autoloses if they trust it. Therefore, any UT claim after D1 without specifically a roleblocker flip is untrustworthy.In post 126, Hectic wrote:Therefore, we mass claim not UT on DAY 2 to prevent that, rather than day 1.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
In post 151, Hectic wrote:Lul, Kanna's been a UTR in every game I've played in. Kanna, what's your opinion of Korina's read on Poyzin's recent post, and do you agree/disagree?
Uhh...semi agree; I don’t really have a read on Poyzin rn. Why do you ask?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
What does this mean?In post 173, Null Vote wrote:I missed shos. I know.
@shos, are you doing/ was doing a gambit you might want to reveal?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
In post 181, Hectic wrote:
Only this game.In post 167, Bingle wrote:
Have you played with Kanna scum?In post 151, Hectic wrote:Lul, Kanna's been a UTR in every game I've played in.
AM I RIGHT, KANNA?
Actually, could I hear your read on Bengle so far?hecticwhatareyoutalkingaboutdon'tsellmeoutlikethat
Also was asked for a readlist so,
<Hectic, Korina, Bingle>
<Farkran>
<No lynch, shoes>
<Sala, Poyzin> = ??? because here's absolutely not enough content
Top tier are naturally townie imo,
Farkran is townie, but I feel like it's more of a ~conscious~ townie
No Lynch, shos; partially POE and partially don't feel so good about their posting- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
very funny. But you know what I meant was what gave you the idea shos was gambiting?/why did you say this?In post 190, Null Vote wrote:
I admitted that I didn't publish my read on shos yet and asked him a question.In post 177, Kanna wrote:
What does this mean?In post 173, Null Vote wrote:I missed shos. I know.
@shos, are you doing/was doing a gambit you might want to reveal?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
^^ that’s a good post. Also think NL shouldn’t be so deadset on the quickhammer thing.In post 259, Farkran wrote:
This, please.In post 254, Hectic wrote:
And why exactly are you not providing reasoning on Kanna and I being town? Even loose uncertain thoughts are fine.In post 241, Poyzin wrote:
This is not an excuse, this is simply admitting that I haven’t been very helpful in terms of reads as I don’t have any posts talking about my own. Hectic and Kanna I feel are town, but that isn’t helpful in itself if I don’t provide any evidence for my reasoning, which I haven’t yet done.In post 240, Poyzin wrote:3) That is the only read I have thus far stated, yes. I don’t like talking about null reads, and the best argument I’ve read about a lynch candidate is Korina’s points on ”no łynch”.
Also i don't really believe everyone besides those three are null for you. Content has been flowing through the last pages - even if you haven't determined the alignment of someone, you can't say they are completely null. There must be something that pinged you the right or the wrong way.
Poyzin as CL with Korina as cultist? Makes sense?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
What?In post 286, shos wrote:
What makes it good then? Why could he make one and you couldn't?In post 100, Kanna wrote:Also goodbye readlist; I couldn’t make one
What makes what good? Also how am I supposed to answer the second question?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Remind me what your reasons are for Poyzin because I ISO’d you and the main reasons I found were about inactivity and prodging. Why Poyzin instead of Sala? I also don’t understand your tunnel on them at all; i’m paranoid you’re targeting them in bad faith. Agree about Korina not being CL thoughIn post 285, Farkran wrote:
Because of ... everything i said in my ISO about poyzin, and post 258 for korina. I don't think korina is the CL, i agree that CL wouldn't be this flashy. But any other cultist can take a hit, and even if that particular post is just a slight, potential scumslip, it would be poor play to ignore such things. It's not like scum would come out and say "oh right, i scumslipped, i need to die now /vote myself". It's not like i scumlocked them either, i just feel i am onto something.In post 274, Kanna wrote:@Farkran; why did you suggest poyzin CL and Korina cultist?- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Also I ISO’d shos and I do think there’s a p high chance of scum. This post stuck out to me in particular:
The first part is a weird/fake townslip, and the second part feels kinda like scummy demotivation(?)In post 325, shos wrote:@Hectic 307: I wasn't fully grasping the setup. I do think I do understand it now though. You can be sure as scum I would have studied the setup faaar better, lol....
it appears to me now that the setp is actually town sided, in general. Cult win condition is to get a MAJORITY, so without a cult leader, technically they're pretty fucked, even if he dies D2 or D3. The cap makes me think all sorts of things I'd consider as scum which could be cool strategicaly but no reason to expose those. Interesting setup- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
So many scumz.
Kinda still leaning towards shos though.
@shos; what do you think about my post? Also any comments about people calling out you fake townslipping?
In post 375, Kanna wrote:Also I ISO’d shos and I do think there’s a p high chance of scum. This post stuck out to me in particular:
The first part is a weird/fake townslip, and the second part feels kinda like scummy demotivation(?)In post 325, shos wrote:@Hectic 307: I wasn't fully grasping the setup. I do think I do understand it now though. You can be sure as scum I would have studied the setup faaar better, lol....
it appears to me now that the setp is actually town sided, in general. Cult win condition is to get a MAJORITY, so without a cult leader, technically they're pretty fucked, even if he dies D2 or D3. The cap makes me think all sorts of things I'd consider as scum which could be cool strategicaly but no reason to expose those. Interesting setup- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Haven't checked your meta yet, but is there a reason you're changing it + telling us you're changing it?In post 399, Blatant Scum wrote:Disclaimer:I will be off-meta in this game (I will, for example, be doing reads). Don't use information gathered in this game for reading my meta.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
There's one right there ^ it's as if to say "don't forget I'm town!!" but it comes across as weird. That's what i was talking about in my earlier post; what's your response?In post 325, shos wrote:@Hectic 307: I wasn't fully grasping the setup. I do think I do understand it now though.You can be sure as scum I would have studied the setup faaar better, lol....
it appears to me now that the setp is actually town sided, in general. Cult win condition is to get a MAJORITY, so without a cult leader, technically they're pretty fucked, even if he dies D2 or D3. The cap makes me think all sorts of things I'd consider as scum which could be cool strategicaly but no reason to expose those. Interesting setup- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
How do you know shos is a mislynch?In post 549, Bingle wrote:Towncore:
Bingle
shos
Kori
Probs not CL because of the ease with which their wagons popped up:
Blatant
Farkran
Don't want to lynch on angleshooty replacing out of a cult game via lurking implies not cult reasons:
Obv
Poyz, Hectic, Kanna all seem like fine lynches. I'd compromise on any of the three, but atm I actually think I prefer Kanna. Sheeping me onto Shos feels like letting a high charisma player geta mislynch and the blame for said mislynch.- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Kanna
-
Kanna Innocent Child
- Kanna
- Innocent Child
- Innocent Child
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: November 15, 2019
Ok, I’m just gonna be honest here; bullet points cause I’m tired.
>I think it’s Bingle/Farkran; Farkran is CL, Bingle is cultist
>Bingle’s “gambit” was probably to make a fake case and push whoever who bit, what he didn’t account for imo is he needed to have confidence shos is town BEFORE pulling the gambit and I’m not sure why he would be confident unless he was cult
>shos is scummy but if I’m right, Bingle tmi’d him as town
>Rn, bingle knows there’s a high chance he’s going down so he’s pushing Farkran
>notice how bingle tried to tie me to Farkran by saying if I flip scum, it’s Farkran? I’m not flipping scum so if you decide to lynch me, it’s supposed to look good for Farkran
>Farkran’s latest combos don’t make sense but I think the main takeaway is just to link me and bingle for if he flips scum (I think he will)
Furthermore, I do think I didn’t really deserve a TR early on in the game, mainly because I didn’t really do that much, so Farkran’s early TR on me felt weird, almost appeasement because I wasn’t TRing them. Farkran has been my secret SR all along.
Also now that we know Poyzin is town, that push on him by Farkran was bad imo; I still have no idea why he tunnelled him apart from inactivity and it seemed easy. - Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna
- Kanna