VOTE: Amrun
Where did you get
Unsatisfactory. You must be crazy.In post 22, Amrun wrote:I actually work in medicine IRL. Fun fact. Not a physician though.In post 21, Jake The Wolfie wrote:To begin this game, we must begin with a simple action and a simple question
VOTE: Amrun
Where did you getdegree in medicine?YOUR
No, I think that they're really an intelligent AI system that perfectly replicated how scum acts, but is actually a Quack Doctor. No wonder they seem crazy.In post 24, Hectic wrote:Obum sounds very defensive here. I could see this being scum being caught out very early. Notice the spacing in his two sentences? If he was enraged and distraught as his exclamation mark suggests, he shouldn't have the damn time to separate his sentences like that. And the second sentence sounds a lot more composed than the first. Robot who can turn his emotions on and off on the flick of a switch? Or SCUM?In post 12, ObviousScum wrote:I had no context and no reason to assume it was a joke!
I thought it sounded serious, and if there was some baggage between you two I think it'd be good to clear the air rather than dance around it.
Scum is my conclusion - if that wasn't clear.
No, you just need to be a Quack Doctor who is also a Cannibal who just so happen to come across a townie.In post 29, Hectic wrote:Huh, I hadn't actually considered that. Townie points to Jake for seeing that; I think it's a lot harder for scum to come to this conclusion given you need to be DEEP inside a townie mindset to see this.In post 27, Jake The Wolfie wrote:No, I think that they're really an intelligent AI system that perfectly replicated how scum acts, but is actually a Quack Doctor. No wonder they seem crazy.
YeIn post 37, Hectic wrote:Claiming targets before end of night seems good. We should probably divide them among towniest players as to not give scum any guaranteed shots at towners.In post 31, Jake The Wolfie wrote:No, you just need to be a Quack Doctor who is also a Cannibal who just so happen to come across a townie.
...not that i happen to do that.
In any case, I want to know how we could try and solve what doctors we might be.
Did your profile pic use to be red? I recall it being a lot more menacing before.
Interesting. Care to elaborate, or are you testing for my reaction?
But why was it serious?In post 83, emps wrote:i was talking about both hectic votes because i kind of voted hectic twice?In post 82, ObviousScum wrote:idk that your jake vote was obviously a joke, I'm not sure it was 'serious' but it seemed like a normal push?In post 79, emps wrote:i think both were pretty obviously jokes
my jake votes kinda serious tho
Is that good evidence for me being scum, or "look at the trees" evidence?In post 85, emps wrote:because your jokes felt forced/overly formal?In post 84, Jake The Wolfie wrote:But why was it serious?In post 83, emps wrote:i was talking about both hectic votes because i kind of voted hectic twice?In post 82, ObviousScum wrote:idk that your jake vote was obviously a joke, I'm not sure it was 'serious' but it seemed like a normal push?In post 79, emps wrote:i think both were pretty obviously jokes
my jake votes kinda serious tho
If there is no good evidence, then why would you push for me being scum? All you're accusing me of is making a joke and questioning your reasons, and you respond with "You must be scum because how else could you explain this"In post 102, GuiltyLion wrote:I don't like this question, asking whether there's "good evidence" is trying to lawyer against a scumread on him instead of sorting emps in return or helping emps resolve concerns about his play.In post 86, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Is that good evidence for me being scum, or "look at the trees" evidence?In post 85, emps wrote:because your jokes felt forced/overly formal?In post 84, Jake The Wolfie wrote:But why was it serious?In post 83, emps wrote:i was talking about both hectic votes because i kind of voted hectic twice?In post 82, ObviousScum wrote:idk that your jake vote was obviously a joke, I'm not sure it was 'serious' but it seemed like a normal push?In post 79, emps wrote:i think both were pretty obviously jokes
my jake votes kinda serious tho
VOTE: Jake
Talk about who our potential targets for protection are.In post 115, GuiltyLion wrote:what do you suggest we do instead to try to sort people, especially in the early game?In post 109, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If there is no good evidence, then why would you push for me being scum?
Bad idea IMO. At best, we have a supposed IC who can be easily CCd by scum, and at worst we have someone that the Mafia do not want to attack in hopea of finding Quack and CPR DocsIn post 130, Amrun wrote:Thoughts on nurse claiming and becoming IC?
A sprinkle of WIFOM says otherwise.In post 132, Amrun wrote:Being CCed by scum is literally the best case scenario though?In post 131, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Bad idea IMO. At best, we have a supposed IC who can be easily CCd by scum, and at worst we have someone that the Mafia do not want to attack in hopea of finding Quack and CPR DocsIn post 130, Amrun wrote:Thoughts on nurse claiming and becoming IC?
The fact that someone just so happened to forget that they put me at L-1 and another hypoyhetical just "voting for pressure" to actually hammer me is more than beyond warrent for me to say "Yeah uh fuck off, thanks."In post 143, emps wrote:kind of aggressive and no ones gonna lolhammer pg 6 and like not expect to get lynched next dayIn post 117, Jake The Wolfie wrote:And just to point out, I am now at L-1, so back the fuck up, thanks.
No comments at all, just "ok?"In post 166, Hectic wrote:Is that all you gotta say, Jake?
What about this?In post 123, Hectic wrote:Do you have thoughts on Amrun's early read on Obum, or his read on me for example?
I would love to give my thoughts, when I have them.In post 176, GuiltyLion wrote:more specifically I'm thinking there's probably at least one scum in the {Jake/George/Obvious Scum/Non Imh} bloc that I don't feel has seriously tried to solve or towntell at all yet, but I don't have things that stand out that I want to ask them about
and then either of Amrun/Hectic I'm not townreading yet because they strike me as competent players who could have faked their level of play so far, but I don't think either is scummy either
so I'm kinda at a loss. Hectic - do you think Jake refusing to give thoughts on these things moves the needle on his alignment?
How certain are you that if I were to die right now, I would flip scum?In post 191, Hectic wrote:I did meta-check him yesterday, and yeah, his play here does strike me as weird. Look here: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11412103In post 176, GuiltyLion wrote:Hectic - do you think Jake refusing to give thoughts on these things moves the needle on his alignment?
There's a lot of early pushing for reads, and open thoughts/solving.
But him continuing to give no thoughts in his last couple of posts after knowing I've caught onto that is interesting - not sure yet if he's just taking a different approach this game or is doubling down as scum.
Do you think that I would get to L-1 without anyone mentioning it?In post 194, Hectic wrote:I think you have the best odds of anyone here right now, but that isn't very high at this stage. Like 45% if you want an arbitrary percentage? Why do you ask?
Why would I suggest something that literally incriminates me? Unless your goal is to throw shade.In post 196, Hectic wrote:Are you suggesting your scum buddy would mention scum!you was on L-1? Gion was the only one to post in the short space of time between George's vote and you pointing it out.
Why do you assume idioticy would be the only reason to hammer me, or even anyone else?In post 221, emps wrote:because it was page 6? if u announced "fyi im at l-1" i dont think any townies in this pl would be dumb enough to lynch uIn post 219, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why would you assume that only scum would hammer me?
Your reads on me feel as genuine as Faux NewsIn post 222, Hectic wrote:I thought that's the point you were making when you said "it paves the way for a scum claiming a pressure vote on me, which would be a very easy thing to pull off because "well no one CLAIMED L-1 on Jake"", but yeah, accidental town hammers also happen obviously.In post 219, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why would you assume that only scum would hammer me?
Do you think my progression/read on you so far is genuine or fabricated?
Suppose someone had an inkling of my alignment and hammered me because of how confident they were. Would that be a reason other than "They are an idiot or scum"?In post 226, emps wrote:there is no one with a non-negative amount of braincells is going to hammer someone page 6 even after l-1 has been declaredIn post 223, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why do you assume idioticy would be the only reason to hammer me, or even anyone else?In post 221, emps wrote:because it was page 6? if u announced "fyi im at l-1" i dont think any townies in this pl would be dumb enough to lynch uIn post 219, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why would you assume that only scum would hammer me?
Now you have me in a bind. Either I vote and you call me scum for only voting after you asked me for it, or you push me for not voting.In post 228, emps wrote:his progression on u feels fine but okIn post 225, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Your reads on me feel as genuine as Faux NewsIn post 222, Hectic wrote:I thought that's the point you were making when you said "it paves the way for a scum claiming a pressure vote on me, which would be a very easy thing to pull off because "well no one CLAIMED L-1 on Jake"", but yeah, accidental town hammers also happen obviously.In post 219, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why would you assume that only scum would hammer me?
Do you think my progression/read on you so far is genuine or fabricated?
also if his progression feels fakewhere is the vote
VOTE: HecticIn post 233, emps wrote:i mean you clearly have a read on hectic but ur just sitting on amrun instead of likeIn post 231, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Now you have me in a bind. Either I vote and you call me scum for only voting after you asked me for it, or you push me for not voting.In post 228, emps wrote:his progression on u feels fine but okIn post 225, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Your reads on me feel as genuine as Faux NewsIn post 222, Hectic wrote:I thought that's the point you were making when you said "it paves the way for a scum claiming a pressure vote on me, which would be a very easy thing to pull off because "well no one CLAIMED L-1 on Jake"", but yeah, accidental town hammers also happen obviously.In post 219, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why would you assume that only scum would hammer me?
Do you think my progression/read on you so far is genuine or fabricated?
also if his progression feels fakewhere is the vote
using your vote
Why? Everyone else that was on my wagon are voting me because they want me dead or they want to put pressure on me because they suspect me, which means that everyone on my wagon think I am scum.In post 232, emps wrote:they are an idiot for hammering page 6.In post 230, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Suppose someone had an inkling of my alignment and hammered me because of how confident they were. Would that be a reason other than "They are an idiot or scum"?In post 226, emps wrote:there is no one with a non-negative amount of braincells is going to hammer someone page 6 even after l-1 has been declaredIn post 223, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why do you assume idioticy would be the only reason to hammer me, or even anyone else?In post 221, emps wrote:because it was page 6? if u announced "fyi im at l-1" i dont think any townies in this pl would be dumb enough to lynch uIn post 219, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why would you assume that only scum would hammer me?
I didn't bother looking at it because I am an uncivilized heathen who has no need for silly things like "Meta"In post 229, Hectic wrote:Lul, why? Do you disagree that you've been acting differently to that newbie game I linked?In post 225, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Your reads on me feel as genuine as Faux NewsIn post 222, Hectic wrote:I thought that's the point you were making when you said "it paves the way for a scum claiming a pressure vote on me, which would be a very easy thing to pull off because "well no one CLAIMED L-1 on Jake"", but yeah, accidental town hammers also happen obviously.In post 219, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why would you assume that only scum would hammer me?
Do you think my progression/read on you so far is genuine or fabricated?
Is information that is given faster a better idea than information that is given over a timespan of days, and can be often incorrect?In post 237, emps wrote:but... it was page 6? i dont think anyone wants anyone dead already that early...In post 236, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why? Everyone else that was on my wagon are voting me because they want me dead or they want to put pressure on me because they suspect me, which means that everyone on my wagon think I am scum.In post 232, emps wrote:they are an idiot for hammering page 6.In post 230, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Suppose someone had an inkling of my alignment and hammered me because of how confident they were. Would that be a reason other than "They are an idiot or scum"?In post 226, emps wrote:there is no one with a non-negative amount of braincells is going to hammer someone page 6 even after l-1 has been declaredIn post 223, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why do you assume idioticy would be the only reason to hammer me, or even anyone else?In post 221, emps wrote:because it was page 6? if u announced "fyi im at l-1" i dont think any townies in this pl would be dumb enough to lynch uIn post 219, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why would you assume that only scum would hammer me?
Is information that is given faster a better idea than information that is given over a timespan of days,In post 243, emps wrote:this statement makes it sound like the only information you ever get is from lynchingIn post 239, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Is information that is given faster a better idea than information that is given over a timespan of days, and can be often incorrect?In post 237, emps wrote:but... it was page 6? i dont think anyone wants anyone dead already that early...In post 236, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why? Everyone else that was on my wagon are voting me because they want me dead or they want to put pressure on me because they suspect me, which means that everyone on my wagon think I am scum.In post 232, emps wrote:they are an idiot for hammering page 6.In post 230, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Suppose someone had an inkling of my alignment and hammered me because of how confident they were. Would that be a reason other than "They are an idiot or scum"?In post 226, emps wrote:there is no one with a non-negative amount of braincells is going to hammer someone page 6 even after l-1 has been declaredIn post 223, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why do you assume idioticy would be the only reason to hammer me, or even anyone else?In post 221, emps wrote:because it was page 6? if u announced "fyi im at l-1" i dont think any townies in this pl would be dumb enough to lynch uIn post 219, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why would you assume that only scum would hammer me?
which is false
we get reads on people other than you throughout the day, yknow that right?
Stop intentionally misrepresenting me.In post 251, emps wrote:oh yeah ok instead of trying to read anyone at all we should just randomly lynch people and pray they flip scum got itIn post 249, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
Is information that is given faster a better idea than information that is given over a timespan of days,and can be often incorrect?
holy fuck i tried to post this but theres a 10 quotes within each other limit
i didnt know that was a thing
If your goal is to win the game as town, then not having reads would be a worse move than having bad reads.In post 254, emps wrote:what is this supposed to mean then?In post 252, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Stop intentionally misrepresenting me.In post 251, emps wrote:oh yeah ok instead of trying to read anyone at all we should just randomly lynch people and pray they flip scum got itIn post 249, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
Is information that is given faster a better idea than information that is given over a timespan of days,and can be often incorrect?
holy fuck i tried to post this but theres a 10 quotes within each other limit
i didnt know that was a thing
the only ways i can interpret it are:
1. dont even try to have reads leave it in the hands of rngesus lul
2. lynching 1 day in is a really good idea
Non lmh wrote:(emps/hec/lion)townblock for me rn
(amrun/icon/obum)null
(jake,george)scum, maybe
I would like an explanation
no pls dont hammer my scumbud i want dem 2 liev /sIn post 277, Iconeum wrote:intend to hammer
I find it interesting that we had not 1, but 2 quickie L-1s in this game.In post 279, GuiltyLion wrote:Jake do you have anything useful to say about your thoughts on George? I just noticed here that you implied that you think he's town
In post 207, Jake The Wolfie wrote:@MrPunGuyManSir
I'm suggesting that Since George didn't announce their L-1 vote, it paves the way for a scum claiming a pressure vote on me, which would be a very easy thing to pull off because "well no one CLAIMED L-1 on Jake"
It's quite declaring that anyone on the wagons are most likely scum, unless George is scum. I doubt an impure wagon on scum on D1 is possible, unless the other scum is very good at the game.In post 281, GuiltyLion wrote:my English teacher in tenth grade taught me that "interesting" is one of the most meaningless words in writing.
What do the "quickie L-1s" tell you about the game state or the alignments of players involved with the wagons?
Lion, you seem to be the common voter here. The person who in tends to hammer isn't even on the first 4 names. I feel scum vibes from this.In post 283, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Hectic, emps, GuiltyLion, and George were on my wagon
Amrun, Non lmh, GuiltyLion, ObviousScum are on the George wagon
You're acting like "Oh they're townread, they must be town and anyone who attacks them is scum"In post 286, emps wrote:alright yeah lets scumread gl because of d1 vca and lets ignore the fact that hes like the towniest out of everyone here
You are also White Knighting someone who you're confident is a good townie, not a good bullshitter.ObviousScum wrote:VOTE: Jake
Do I have to put my quacking needle through your head to understand?In post 292, ObviousScum wrote:idgaf about GL, I'm just voting someone talking about wagon purity, wagons don't have bloodlines man.
#AllWagonsMatter
I'm not going to accept someone who just says "Don't scumread GL!!! THEY'RE TOWN!!!1!!11!1!"emps wrote:you have put almost 0 effort into sorting people
im not gonna accept any wagon with such weak reasoning
If you haven't noticed, I am not voting them. But the fact that 2 people just came up and said to stop scumreading GL pushed my slight scumlean of them into a scumread. VOTE: GuiltyLionIn post 297, emps wrote:thats not what im saying. have you even bothered to read my posts? im saying d1 vca is bullshit reasoning and is just about as good as using a random number generator to decide who to vote.In post 296, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Do I have to put my quacking needle through your head to understand?In post 292, ObviousScum wrote:idgaf about GL, I'm just voting someone talking about wagon purity, wagons don't have bloodlines man.
#AllWagonsMatterI'm not going to accept someone who just says "Don't scumread GL!!! THEY'RE TOWN!!!1!!11!1!"emps wrote:you have put almost 0 effort into sorting people
im not gonna accept any wagon with such weak reasoning
I'm only hammering if you get other people to back you.In post 301, Hectic wrote:There's probably 1 scum in George/Jake, but feeling better about flipping Jake right now. He just seems to be focusing on all the wrong things in the questions he asks and his attempts to solve. Maybe you should hammer George, this might be your only chance to not be lynched today, Jake.
Scummy and awful.In post 303, Hectic wrote:What's your read on George then? How would you rate the quality of his puns?
That is my PoE as of now, yes.In post 305, Hectic wrote:So you scumread me, George and GuiltyLion, correct?
Please go quack yourself.In post 309, emps wrote:things are going to getIn post 304, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Scummy and awful.In post 303, Hectic wrote:What's your read on George then? How would you rate the quality of his puns?hecticbetween you and i because you just insulted the hectic puns.
You are a Duck with how quack you are.emps wrote:things are going to get hecticer if you insult me or my puns one more time.In post 319, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Please go quack yourself.In post 309, emps wrote:things are going to getIn post 304, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Scummy and awful.In post 303, Hectic wrote:What's your read on George then? How would you rate the quality of his puns?hecticbetween you and i because you just insulted the hectic puns.
In post 325, emps wrote:sooooo
you gonna explain anything or answer any of the questions we asked?
or just unvote gl and pretend nothing ever happened
I decided that my logic was faulty and full of holes, so I admitted that I was wrong by unvoting.In post 329, emps wrote:answer our questions?In post 328, Jake The Wolfie wrote:In post 325, emps wrote:sooooo
you gonna explain anything or answer any of the questions we asked?
or just unvote gl and pretend nothing ever happened
So I'm scum no matter what the fuck I do.
Nice.
So, am I town, or am I scum?In post 343, emps wrote:so i dont think hes just bad town tbh
..what the hell does this meanIn post 345, ObviousScum wrote:you had never mentioned george before this right?In post 277, Iconeum wrote:intend to hammer
Welcome to Budget hospital. We're too poor to afford an actual vote count.In post 350, Datisi wrote:VC
No, we're on a budget. We cannot financially afford people dying.In post 355, ObviousScum wrote:hmm, this slot must be day-bp vs my dayvig, seems like a scum ability to meIn post 352, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Welcome to Budget hospital. We're too poor to afford an actual vote count.In post 350, Datisi wrote:VC
Explain this vote, please.
I would've totally hammered George before because I scumread them. However, that would be silly as my confidence levels weren't high, and no one would've probably supported me anyway.In post 389, emps wrote:do you actually scumread george or are u just trying to avoid being lynchedIn post 387, Jake The Wolfie wrote:VOTE: GeorgeBailey
Now that there's no real threat for a hammer, I'll vote George
be honest here
I just don't like that slot in general and want to see them flipped.In post 391, ObviousScum wrote:Do you scumread George for any reason other than the fact you don't like his puns and he voted you at one point?