In post 4, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'M WILLING TO HAMMER! DO YOU HEAR THAT? I AM WILLING TO HAMMER!!
VOTE: Norwee
In post 4, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'M WILLING TO HAMMER! DO YOU HEAR THAT? I AM WILLING TO HAMMER!!
In post 6, AaronFrost wrote:In post 4, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'M WILLING TO HAMMER! DO YOU HEAR THAT? I AM WILLING TO HAMMER!!
In post 10, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Careful now Hectic, you might be my traitor buddy. I don't want to push you so hard yet.
Is that a reference to something?In post 11, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And before you ask, no i didn't join the game just to say that in the first post. But was it a big part of the reason? Definitely.
This is partly it, but not completely.In post 24, Espeonage wrote:I am ready to get out of shitpost phase bc I want to know why you have adopted spinning a narrative of scum won't hammer.
Bc realistically, until deadline if town doesn't hammer then we can't lose bc scum have to sac one of their own. So really it's town that should be refusing to hammer.
I think we know each other better than we know ourselves at this point, Norwee. I'd trust your read on me more than I'd trust my own role PM, and I'd expect the same from you.In post 31, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I ain’t seeing it chief. And if i don’t know myself then who can we really trust to be able to properly see whatever it is you’re seeing?
Fine, I'll explain:In post 4, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'M WILLING TO HAMMER! DO YOU HEAR THAT? I AM WILLING TO HAMMER!!
I'm not saying you did it with a plan in mind. I just think the joke itself is more likely to come from scum because of the subconscious mindsets I explained earlier.In post 37, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You’re making it sound like you think i play with a motive in mind when i roll scum. As opposed to just coasting. Come on now. I read on the rules that if scum hammers on day 1 they die. So i started joking about it. That’s the problem with everyone who scumreads me, they think i have some kind of master galaxy mind motive with my play. When really i’m just being me.
Lul, nowIn post 38, clidd wrote:Good evening, i was reading the setup specifications and thinking about how my approach would be in this match, especially with the established peculiarities about the absence of the night phase, and the premature mechanical death attributed to mafia, in case of an incorrect lynch. This, of course, creates space for unusual strategies more focused on morning turnover. With that thought in mind, i understood the first post 4 as a message with three possible interpretations:1-Random joke,2-Instinctive statement,3-Divergence of attention, where his partners receive a window to ''safe'' vote, drastically reducing the possibility of them falling under the ''mechanical death hammer'', which appears to be more likely, compared to other possibilities. This basically implies that are 2/3 potential scums inDsjstr,HecticandEspeonage, in theory. But would everyone outside the wagon share the same indecision ? Is it plausible ?
Also, i would like to discuss this paragraph that I found inMini Normal 2098, post41, referring toNorwegianboyEE:
(https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=94&t=80889)It’s cool, i’m a bit of a kamikaze town so i don’t really spend too much time attempting to clear myself as i do trying to attack others i perceive as scum. When i’m scum it’s ironically the opposite, where i do all i can to avoid being seen as suspicious and trying to stay on the good side of the town.
What do you guys think of this statement ?
What gives you that impression?In post 57, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not sure you’re engaging me in good faith Hectic. It seems like you’re blowing this way out of proportion.
Is this your scum!play at last?
In post 49, AaronFrost wrote:Hectic are you thinking that Norwee is one of the traitor wolves who's signaling to the other traitor? Because that was my first thought when I read his opening post.
Don't you think scum delay hammering town since they're guaranteed die there?In post 71, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Boy. Have you ever even played a mafia game?In post 69, Hectic wrote:Do you mean scum would hammer town? I don't think they ever do that.
Scum don't hammer town? HAH.
HAHA.
I think this kind of misunderstanding might be town-indicative. Traitors don't know each other, and the main wolf and the traitors already know each other. So there's nothing for them to indicate to each other by doing that.In post 79, dsjstr wrote:So like I saw what Norwegian said as a joke. I don't think anyone was really going to try and hammer during RVS in lylo so I just went along with it. There are some good points that if the werewolves wanted to communicate they would do so by voting, but is that something they would know to do? Having experience in quick games (around 30 mins), someone who silent votes is a typical sign of a mafia member.In this case I am talking about Doctor Drew, so would he be trying to signal Hectic is what I'm thinking.
Nope, I've just been giving it some thought. I think we should either:In post 78, clidd wrote:You seem to have significant experience in this type of play. Have you ever played a similar setup ? What would be the best town decision considering that we are in lylo and scum can bluff by hammering partner ?In post 70, Hectic wrote:The fun thing is that people can't refuse to hammer if we decide on someone, since we just lynch that person instead and have the hammerer be the person we originally planned to lynch.
Ah... that game.In post 98, NorwegianboyEE wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11514149In post 97, Hectic wrote:Also, Norwee, link me the player he reminds you of from the Newbie game you're referencing.
RIP. Btw, Norwee and I should be switched around in who we're voting for.In post 102, theslimer3 wrote:Me before starting the game: I’m going to have the heading of every page have a vote count and all of them will have a story pertaining to the lore of this game mode!
Yeah, I realised that soon after. I didn't realise town hammering scum is a lot worse for them.In post 103, AaronFrost wrote:I think they might in order to get past the day one rule, especially if they're the traitor goon. Then the two remaining scum just know who each other are and the game is still in lylo anyways so all they'd need is one mislynch.
What do you make of this, Norwee? Possible townslip?In post 77, clidd wrote:@AaronFrost
In your opinion, hypothetically speaking, how should a traitor signal if he knew his partner, but did not know who the werewolf is ?
In post 112, AaronFrost wrote:
Right now I'd say clidd is 'slightly' more townie than Norwee but I don't have a confident enough read in either player to answer that question.
He thought there's a scenario where the traitor knows the other traitor but not the werewolf, which obviously can't be the case. Do you think it's real/fake?In post 113, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Why do you think it might be a townslip?In post 111, Hectic wrote:What do you make of this, Norwee? Possible townslip?In post 77, clidd wrote:@AaronFrost
In your opinion, hypothetically speaking, how should a traitor signal if he knew his partner, but did not know who the werewolf is ?
Hey, Doro, did you miss this post:In post 136, dsjstr wrote:I know how you guys feel, have four classes on Thursday one of which is a three hour night class. Just skimming through, Aaron really only posted about mechanics and nothing that is AI. I don't know how to interpret how Hectic and Drew are
interacting. Are the votes signals? Is someone getting pocketed? Am I too tired to think logically?If there was some kind of signal and I am hoping there wasn't I can't pinpoint it. It might just be from Drew's first post.Clidd is putting in a genuine effort
to solve but I think it is weird that he didn't know how all of the roles work but he knew about the exact wording from a rule that was written incorrectly in this thread. I think that it is more likely that he knew about the wolves roles but just wanted to
be perceived as town. I'm not confident in that read because it is also likely that he just made a mistake. I do like the chill vibes from this lobby, the newbie games are not like this.
What exactly do you mean by signalling to each other? How does a traitor signal to another traitor that they are not aware of, as that is what you're implying when you said Drew may be signalling to me.In post 91, Hectic wrote:I think this kind of misunderstanding might be town-indicative. Traitors don't know each other, and the main wolf and the traitors already know each other. So there's nothing for them to indicate to each other by doing that.In post 79, dsjstr wrote:So like I saw what Norwegian said as a joke. I don't think anyone was really going to try and hammer during RVS in lylo so I just went along with it. There are some good points that if the werewolves wanted to communicate they would do so by voting, but is that something they would know to do? Having experience in quick games (around 30 mins), someone who silent votes is a typical sign of a mafia member.In this case I am talking about Doctor Drew, so would he be trying to signal Hectic is what I'm thinking.
I still don't understand what you mean here. I want you to elaborate on what you meant when you said "In this case I am talking about Doctor Drew, so would he be trying to signal Hectic is what I'm thinking."In post 152, dsjstr wrote:I was thinking the werewolf has all the knowledge and the traitors have enough to be able to figure out who the other traitor is. I talked about the signal being between you and Drew the first time because I see RVS as the time to get away with signalling by voting. I could really look at any interaction and claim it is signalling but I like coming up with theories like that.
What about AaronFF? Why does he lean town-indicative? And is Espeonage primarily scum-indicative for his early vote?In post 157, clidd wrote:There are other reads that stand out in the item '' scum-indicative ''. Yes, that's exactly why I put you as a "Joker", because there is an oscillation in the read that I captured about you.
Yeah, no problem. I'm asking dsjstr what he meant when he posted this:In post 161, clidd wrote:I did not understand the question, can you rephrase the question ? i am still overcoming the language barrier (I'm from Spain).In post 158, Hectic wrote:I still don't understand what you mean here. I want you to elaborate on what you meant when you said "In this case I am talking about Doctor Drew, so would he be trying to signal Hectic is what I'm thinking."In post 152, dsjstr wrote:I was thinking the werewolf has all the knowledge and the traitors have enough to be able to figure out who the other traitor is. I talked about the signal being between you and Drew the first time because I see RVS as the time to get away with signalling by voting. I could really look at any interaction and claim it is signalling but I like coming up with theories like that.
Are Drew and I traitors in your hypothetical, are one of us the Main Wolf? Help me understand.
The bit in green is referring to this post:In post 79, dsjstr wrote:So like I saw what Norwegian said as a joke. I don't think anyone was really going to try and hammer during RVS in lylo so I just went along with it. There are some good points that if the werewolves wanted to communicate they would do so by voting, but is that something they would know to do? Having experience in quick games (around 30 mins), someone who silent votes is a typical sign of a mafia member.In this case I am talking about Doctor Drew, so would he be trying to signal Hectic is what I'm thinking.
He's saying Drew was signalling to me/telling me we're both scum in some way. But that doesn't make sense because the traitors only know the Main Wolf, so how do they signal to someone they don't know? There are other possibilities but I won't say them until dsjstr responds, because I want to hear what he was thinking first.
Okay, but since Drew's only made 6 posts so far, are you not interested in hearing more from him first?In post 183, clidd wrote:Norwegian is out of the question today. For me, the effort he put in when he answered me was something that I identified with. Doctor Drew is the most rational choice considering the other options, something that I believe, or at least believed, that you would be able to observe too.
There's no nights in this game. You as town lynching Drew who is scum is always better than Drew as scum lynching town-you, which results in both of you dying.In post 193, clidd wrote:In that case, I would choose to use today's rule in reverse, with me being voted on and Doctor Drew hammering, so we would both be eliminated and all theories about a possible coercive coding on my part would be disregarded, making room for you to work in a more peaceful resolution of the match.
Two names that are scum or town?In post 194, clidd wrote:If the double elimination scenario I mentioned occurs, I would like to suggest two names that will guide the outcome of the match.