Probably "Don't spam the thread with inane side conversations", in which case he would be correct, he didn't follow that rule.In post 50, Eragon wrote:what's the golden U-pick rule OwOIn post 49, Espeonage wrote:I didn't follow my golden u-pick rule and I'm regretting it.
Can you explain this better - you set up a neighborhood, how many people can be in it, is there anything we're missing here. Bitmap you can answer this tooIn post 6, Espeonage wrote:Real talk though, the president gets to hand pick a hood. Bitmap might have cliques and be able to soul read some of the playlist but I don't think they need a hood to do that.
I think I have the ability to read strongly in a hood setting and hopefully set up a pseudo masonry. I am also extremely hard to pocket, which I think is probably the strongest difference between me and Bitty. No offence.
Krazy hasn't posted yetIn post 84, Wondertime wrote:who knew scum!krazy would be such an easy fucking catch
Want to elaborate on that read?In post 88, Shadowlesscloud wrote:I can see yume easily being scum
In post 240, Amrun wrote: Not exactly. I picked a girl weebs rage over. I actually quite like her myself, in certain ways, and enjoy trolling about her.
Chitoge?In post 241, Amrun wrote:Somewhere in my pm, the phrase “worst girl” appears. That’s all I have to say.
So you don't care if we vote for Espeonage then?In post 319, Bitmap wrote: The thing is the whole student council president debate is just noise and I don't see the point of Esp and I continually arguing who should be president as something beneficial to town. It'd probably benefit scum more to create more noise with the elections.
When did they agree to hood each other?In post 331, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You know, this theory would fit the narrative of why Espeonage and Bitmap are "agreeing" to hood each other right now.In post 328, Shadowlesscloud wrote:I wouldnt say so. It just would distract us during the first day and basically let scum make their own neighborhood chat.
Not a girl, so it wouldn't have been acceptedIn post 339, Bitmap wrote:My waifu is Bernie Sanders.
Uh... it would be new to me, actuallyIn post 360, Shadowlesscloud wrote:Fake mod announcers are not new to upicks
Who do you think we should vote?In post 367, Amrun wrote:That was an oddly quick succession of votes.
I have no opinion on this wagon.
I almost voted Eragon around post 75, but didn't - Espeonage voting is what prompted me to vote, though.In post 370, Amrun wrote:Did you only vote because Espeonage did?In post 368, Yumeko and Kirari wrote:Who do you think we should vote?In post 367, Amrun wrote:That was an oddly quick succession of votes.
I have no opinion on this wagon.
-Y
Well that's what you asked us for, so...In post 380, Amrun wrote:Seems like a backward justification of a sheep on Eragon.
?In post 407, Wondertime wrote:YIKESIn post 369, Yumeko and Kirari wrote:i wanna fuckin meme but I just fucked up my arm real bad
Y is gonna have to handle our slot for a bit sorry
X when does your ability activate?
-K
What did they say with regards to me that you agree with?In post 426, Farkran wrote:i think i agree with you with regards to yumeko.
wtf?In post 210, Bitmap wrote:Ok Krazy sucks but I'm pretty cool I'd say.
ok well our ability is fucking weird. we *initiate* during the day and then you get a text prompt but we don't know when it resolves because our thing is a "mystery gamble"... so if its a day action it'd suck but if it's a randomized night action then I think us crossing should resolve and the boost go off, but there is technically a chance it's a day actionIn post 464, Xtoxm wrote:at the end of the night like other abilities i'd expect - nothing in my role pm to indicate otherwise
you've basically exclusively focused on meta when my baseline point was "you seem to be posting a lot but not making a lot of content readable as town" and now I feel like you're making some content that is at least slightly scummy. I don't see you writing the posts in the last two pages in the way that you do as town tbhIn post 563, Eragon wrote:what part of my response is SELECTIVE INTERPRETATION of your point?
Alright let me go over this for you:In post 542, Amrun wrote:It’s more the manner in which one cares about appearances. That particular one just rubbed me the wrong way.In post 527, Espeonage wrote:Ok, but I did address that. I know I care much more about my appearance as town than as scum. Bc I know I can always cash in on free credit as scum by using theatre and aloofness and idgaf is usually towered by people.In post 525, Amrun wrote:In post 516, Espeonage wrote:This is gonna look terrible for me if YandK flips scum. But I really don't see their vote as an issue.
Like, I spent a good half hour debating who to vote after Eragon bc Adorable felt too convenient while Norway is annoyed at me already and I didn't want to fan the flames, and I have an agenda to be town read with the election.
It may bc I lie more as town than as scum and care more about being town read as town than as scum, but I legit feel like the one liner added to the 'case' and was a fine vote, especially for the game state.
It’s not about the vote. The one liner was fine (and accurate).
I don’t know how to say in many more creative ways that I don’t mind the vote.
That’s why I don’t scumread Bitmap for it. Starting a wagon just to start one is actually 100% fine for this gamestate. It’s not about the vote! It’s about me realizing that they’re appearance concerned.
I don't think caring about appearances is AI necessarily.
Like - did they even think they wanted to vote at post 75, or did they just invent that because they thought I was about to attack them for sheeping?
What would the town concern about voting vs not voting at page 75 even be?
Why would scum be concerned about this - why would Town?
IMO there are a lot more scum reasons to be having any of those thoughts.
if the caps gimmick doesn't end, maybe...
