yeah you /outed lol
VOTE: Homura
because rebellion was a mistake
i dunno can a goon shoot him to check please?Chemist1422 wrote:VOTE: Chemist
this is my easy strat to clear myself as a VT is it working
yeah you /outed lol
i dunno can a goon shoot him to check please?Chemist1422 wrote:VOTE: Chemist
this is my easy strat to clear myself as a VT is it working
actually you're here as a player so you should be scumhunting not standing byIn post 16, Yshtola Rhul wrote:Hello everybody, my name is Y'shtola Rhul. I am here as an observer and a scholar to the art of mafia.
I will be on standby if needed.
So you're saying you two have chemistry?In post 42, Klick wrote:I'm also more familiar with Chemist than the rest of this list.
y tho
who is Aethur?In post 123, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm townreading Aethur and TSE.
it'd be even spookier if it turned out that such a book ~never existed~In post 129, CheekyTeeky wrote:Random sidenote: when I was a teen I read a book called Klick and that character gave me nightmares. I can only vaguely remember it now.
Empty how?In post 135, CheekyTeeky wrote:It was more the subtle encouragement of the wagon. His content in general seems empty.
Seems just a tad scummy, moreso if TSE later flips scum. If TSE flips scum then it looks like Auro is trying to poke at TSE to engage with Klick in a townier way.In post 136, Homura wrote:What'd you make of Auro saying it wa a valid reason to townread him?In post 107, Alduskkel wrote:VOTE: TSE
I’m not buying your Auro town read. Anyone could have easily said what Auro said regardless of alignment.
Seriously? What if Auro started doing the scummiest shit ever? I'd almost think you're setting up for a potential pivot onto a Day 2 Auro vote.In post 137, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Anyway, let me make it more simple.
I’m considering Auro an IC for Day 1.
On Day 2 I’ll re-evaluate him.
While his post can come from scum I’m letting it slide as Town for today.
this is what I expected klick to sayIn post 156, Klick wrote:Fwiw this was 100% a troll response, I don't have a read on Chem yet
eh, I feel like the stuff you quoted is more conversational rather than scum trying to make content for the sake of content.In post 171, CheekyTeeky wrote:Like tl;dr I don't actually see klick sorting. I just see content for the sake of content. I've seen one town read on yshtola, one scumread on TSE who I'm pretty sure is town. Each of those reads is the only real content in his ISO.
ugh that is really different from here. plus, I'm getting reminded of town TSE during marathon weekend + me scumreading him for his playstyle rather than it being truly scum-indicative.In post 175, CheekyTeeky wrote:Skim this: linkIn post 173, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Cheeky, can you quote some of TSE's posts that you think are out of his scumrange?
And tell me he's not town here. I've played with both town!tse and scum!tse and the kinda non-chalantness and lack of tryharding is very much in line with his town meta.
How do you ever convince people to lynch your scumreads then?In post 218, Miss Lane wrote:Additionally, I think explanations for votes are overrated and used far more often than warranted.
well that's exactly what a VT would sayIn post 221, popsofctown wrote:Mason mindgames are antitown
well then by that logic shouldn't every player be trying to hide? VTs to look like masons, masons to avoid getting shot, scum to look town, etc.?In post 224, popsofctown wrote:This is a scummy post since it should be somewhat intuitive that a "hiding strategy" for masons is almost as dominant as active scumhunting from the symmetry of the setup.
In post 225, Miss Lane wrote:I'll explain an Ask read when I'm ready.
It's a serious question.In post 238, Miss Lane wrote:In post 237, Alduskkel wrote:well then what's the purpose of your vote on me?
nah cuz I already know you're town cuz we're masons togetherIn post 255, Auro wrote:Yeah, is it working?In post 251, Alduskkel wrote:Auro, are you buddying me?
wait do you mean auro or is it a player not in this game?In post 280, popsofctown wrote:Kinda am not vibing with watching the mod nom a townie for an award for using verbal abuse to scumhunt and make the scum more readable and then turn around and respect a gag order about the event but that's just drunkpops
It reads more like NAI human conversation than scum filler.In post 294, CheekyTeeky wrote:What's the difference?In post 230, Alduskkel wrote:I feel like the stuff you quoted is more conversational rather than scum trying to make content for the sake of content.
better be, i mean we're masons after allIn post 299, popsofctown wrote:alduskkell you are getting precipitously close from jumping from null to DEFINITIONALLY TIED WITH MY OTHER TOWNREADS
yeah but you already knew that since all 3 of us are masonsIn post 312, CheekyTeeky wrote:Auro/Aldu not SvS.In post 251, Alduskkel wrote:Egix, who do you scumread?
Auro, are you buddying me?
pedit: can I get in on this support group
In post 328, Miss Lane wrote:Just give me one. Please. I want one reason for one of your posts. One reason that the post is actually productive, and not just some reactionary question because you play the game on auto-pilot. Just give me one snippet that displays you've put even the slightest amount of thought into the questions you ask.
Can you tone down the hostility? It's fine if you think I'm scum, but please don't act like I'm brainless.In post 330, Miss Lane wrote:I'm starved for faith here, give me some reason to believe you're worth my time.
nah we're both masons, this is an elaborate distancing tacticIn post 345, popsofctown wrote:I think the Alduskel vs. Miss Lynch interaction has an SvT look and I hope soberpops can sort which side when she is done chastising drunkpops's staying up late
Miss Lynch wrote:I'm too impulsive, rash, and I have a bit of a temper, even though I think the way that I play is generally pretty close to optimal.
What do you make of Auro vs Miss Lynch? Which one do you agree with more?In post 387, Yshtola Rhul wrote:Do you have questions about any in particular?In post 386, Alduskkel wrote:is roleplaying really necessary
I can't tell if the 3 players you named are your townreads or scumreads
I don't really understand this part. Could you phrase it more clearly?In post 394, Yshtola Rhul wrote:Miss Lynch can go either way, I mainly don't like the overreactions to being questioned without being confronted at the same time. In the same case, she would likely be more careful about how to proceed when she is confronted, which was always either ignored or fought with the same intensity.
In post 293, Egix96 wrote:This afternoon I'll have a go.In post 279, Alduskkel wrote:so how do you plan on fixing that
So I prompted Egix to actually do some scumhunting but this post is very underwhelming. No real scumreads, hell no real townreads either.In post 401, Egix96 wrote:Y'shtola
Her questioning of things feels genuine and I empathise with her reading people based on feels, as is shown in 380.
Klick
I kinda wish that 51 wasn't a "troll response" because I actually kinda agree with it.
104 - I find it a little bit odd that Klick seemed openly indifferent towards the Teeky wagon although TSE, whom Klick was voting at the time, was on there. I feel as though Klick would be more opposed to the wagon in that case.
Auro
144 - I don't get what's -worthy about that.
277 - "I want to alt-hunt Rhul." - I presume this is because you believe it will help you read her? Otherwise I'm not seeing the point.
TSE
145 -> 146 - My immediate feeling was that this was scummy (sort of like an "argh damn I shouldn't have said that" response) but upon thinking about it a bit more carefully... is it really a scum's immediate thought to say "yes that's exactly what I'm doing" when they see someone accusing them of doing something scummy? I also kinda feel like the same kind of logic applies to 151.
185 - You seem to be failing to realise that saying someone is a VT narrows down the possibilities of who could be mason. It's hunting them by PoE.
how much content would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck content?In post 461, woodchuck321 wrote:Auro smells a bit off. Too much off-topic stuff or jokes.
this was also my interpretation of yshtola's postIn post 490, Auro wrote:Pops, it seems obvious that Rhul means there's simply readable content from the three but isn't sure if alignment, she then says ML could "go either way" - I'm surprised you'd misinterpret this.In post 380, Yshtola Rhul wrote:My purpose in this game is to find players with an exceptional quality aether. Whether they are warriors of light or sin eaters is sadly not up to me to decide, for I cannot tell the difference between them.
Very interesting.In post 681, Hectic wrote:1¥£#¥$
Why is pushing anyone anti-town?In post 527, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm falling behind and losing motivation to care as I'm starting to get the feeling pushing anyone is actually anti-town. Maybe if we all shush then scum will have to shoot out of sheer boredom.
You're less confident about Suji than Egix, yet you're voting Suji?In post 549, Auro wrote:That's Suji. I feel less confident about that than Egix though.
I sorta see the logic here, but at the same time a sudden influx of votes on me might also just indicate that I'm scummy scum.In post 588, Miss Lane wrote:Not presenting a case vs presenting a case is part of why it's a sorting mechanism. If I give a valid reason as to why I think Albion should be lynched, then anyone voting with me is either merely giving me a shot or thinks I have a bit of a case. But if my Albacore vote contains nothing of the sort, then any votes that join me on voting him have their own reasons for voting him. It's my own way of encouraging people to come out of the closet on certain reads they might be holding. It also gives scum a chance to vote for him, because my vote gives his wagon more equity and indicates that town might be more willing to vote him than they previously thought. An influx of votes on Alfred with little to no explanation would quickly indicate he is likely town.
Don't like this vote.
whatIn post 637, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:I didn’t read ML’s posts at all and can tell it’s probably scum Motivated
Although Pops responds with Suji before I also don’t like.
Is this your pick for the scumteam?In post 642, Auro wrote:{Pops, Suji, Egix, Woodchuck} 4/4
In post 1674, Chemist1422 wrote:I whatIn post 1673, Auro wrote:I'll concede that Chemist knows what he's doing.