Newbie 1988 | Octopus | Over

[QuantumQuasar]

What if I don't vote teh clasdic random d1 'cause I know I'm gonna win

[QuantumQuasar]

Also hi, Cheeky.

Hiya! What game did we play in? I have an old person's memory.

This one.

I'm suspecting cheekyteeky lunarrest and truesoulenergy as the latter two seem to know each other plus its so obvious its either a double goon or spec goon ingame right now but nobody is randoming because we win in two nights

tapiocaphobe might be clear at 67% thanks to overdefensiveness

however am voting phoenix because of an illegal move quoting another game and saying necessarily

vote ph0enix

doc on me otherwise someone else because I might get targeted for showing off and saying I'll win

Adding a colon so the automated vote counter will catch it: vote: ph0enix
--P

[QuantumQuasar]

hey Ph0enix "Crafty Phisherman" what's your price full stop you're under investigation for spearfishing links from a past game that's now current as mentioned esrlier redirecting to forum trackers in line with the 2020 world organisation on night watch

[QuantumQuasar]

y'all acting ilke you know each other I'm just minding my own business
my opinion on tapioca is no comment
since you referred to another situation where you knew someone then that makes that suspicious,
I'm the only trustworthy person for doctor to heal
every town has at least one officer or doc

I think the persons voted on d1 are innocent and whoever bandwagoned into voting, the voters are more suspect
besides TrueSoulEnergy you had work which meant that doc or officer should check what work you do at day or night

[QuantumQuasar]

that vespers drink from royale was like gin vodka and that wine liqueur besides the plot of octopussy is like some goldfinger codename for a moonraker, I had a password that was octopussy of steel I'll tell you that as a secret

where's that iron curtain from the cold 89

octopuses are very smart so I hope this does them justice even though sushi doesn't make brainy food because the green tea matcha is green but salads can be a dessert with jello pearls

speaking of vespers wasnt it ash wednesday a few days back because lent doesn't make you soy as evening service doesn't make you set

[QuantumQuasar]

can we make a statue because nobody can be trusted currently

this is starting to be lord of the fliesesque

I don't want to be the sacrificial lamb

the opening move was classic though someone is confusing everyone and no consensus yet from some body language script reading claim I guess that's why if we have a statue then that's at least watching us and it's not like it's a religious symbol

who can sculpt a statue of poseidon

[QuantumQuasar]

Phi posted only once? Two goons versus PR/goon, one silent one talkative

Considering Phi Kappa silent pull info from

tapioca easy pull
karnage close enough to be sideways
lunar both silen
phoenix precise nervous
tse present similar opposite enough to be forgotten
titus blase but could be hiding more
cheeky further aloof

cheeky tapioca
cheeky karnage
cheeky lunar
cheeky phoenix
cheeky tse
cheeky titus
cheeky phi

titus lunar
titus phi ok combo
titus cheeky soso
titus karnage fed
titus phoenix lasso

lunar karnage / karnage lunar commodores

phoenix tapioca
titus tapioca karnage titus

[QuantumQuasar]

vote ph0enix

post #51

rule #4 Don't talk about ongoing games - You may not talk to each other about this game outside of threads I have created for this purpose. You may not talk about other ongoing games in this thread.

My vote is fhe only correct one because we're not bandwagoning day one

Plus, Lunarrest and Phi can both be afk and considered incapacitated in an estate where we all hold joint shares so in the event no action happens on night one (as it should because we're not waiting for blood to be spilled)

then why replace them?

vote ph0enix and let the two others be afk

[QuantumQuasar]

Voting ph0enix due to a violation of a rule is fact based.

I would still have a clear conscience.

The point is that a reference has been made to an external realm. What happened on post #51 affected the integrity of all participants in that instance and in this present one.

I had a hunch reasoning earlier on tells and I'm not trying to convince anyone of the defensibility on this action as I might be wrong and you are responsible for your own actions, instead of relying on behavioral reads I would be much more comfortable just lynching who is already guilty from a broken rule.

With regard to whoever is afk maybe they gave up and we should bear responsibility as time is running

I'm very sorry I don't know about you but one life. I'm not YOLOing my life and I don't know if I'll live by day two.

I'd rather think of the defensibility of my actions at the gates of heaven on judgement day.

That's why as a disclaimer regarding responsibility, a rule was broken and the consequence is not mine.

What's worse is the persistence of error.

[QuantumQuasar]

We can't have collective responsibility but we can have privateand individual good conscience from our own actions. The incentive to lynch to obtain feedback is a morally false premise fpr divide and conquer tactics.

I mentioned earlier the statue sculpted as law is better for the custody of Phi Kappa Phi and Lunarrest.

Instead of looking for an anchor and bias, I'm not going to speculate and focus what I can do.

I would recommend lynching ph0enix and ending the day early with phi kappa phi and lunarrest inactive before they wake up from their slumber after more than 48 hours so we can get moving instead of beating around the bush.

[QuantumQuasar]

The diffrrence is the governing dynamics of the past experience with another participant which makes that game ongoing as it never ends, jt never ever ends

imagine how weak is to not auto lynch a player mentioning another finished game to another

that's what makes that different to karnage reference of a past memory of another player called watson who was a jailer , on how to reminiscence is not presence because you're both present and unconsciously recall and this discussion on technics is much more substantive than speculation

Why do you expect moderators to have an overwatch when quid custodiet custodies, who watches the watchmen

This is not even a thought experiment it's just common sense, now who gets malicious glee out of this from dumbfoundness because this game is ongoing cannot be talked about and your past game is still ongoing just like that famous line "everytime I get out, they pull me back in"

quote:
Discussion of Ongoing Mafia Games is Not Allowed

Recently we have had a spate of people discussing ongoing games. Though this has led to a record number of ongoing game bans, there may be a perception that there is some wiggle room when it comes to discussing ongoing games. This post is to tell you that there is not.

It does not matter if you are dead.
It does not matter if you don't think it will affect a game.
It does not matter if you aren't in the game.
It does not matter if you are posting about a game taking place on another forum or posting about an MS game on another forum.
It does not matter if you are moderating the game in question.

Discussing ongoing games by quoting or otherwise referring to an ongoing game is forbidden. There is no clever way around this rule. Don't try.

If you are unsure whether something violates the rule against discussing ongoing games, please don't hesitate to contact a listmod.

[QuantumQuasar]

play to win but don't try too hard to appear desperate, this isn't just some triviality toronto stock exchange

seriously someone is pulling town with a carrot on a stick and manipulating opinion until someone reacts unless you remain passive and meek

the bluepill is real

[QuantumQuasar]

I would vote your replacement because the intention of your action on a point of reference makes you both falsely unassociated or associated falsely with the premise of being unassociated. Conversely looking for too much rationale so even if words are fully defensible to first move leads to buddying up or inadvertently leaving some innuendo

Walt Disney said the good side of people shows up and that takes more time for some so you might be protecting me but we're lynching each kther which shows that power roles are looking for info. you communicated precisely with premeditation of sharing which shows intent to make contact to latch on a point of reference.

[QuantumQuasar]

Posts 79, 118 and 135

Found them both, lol @ my performance on this /

well played on the win for town thx crush