Welcome have a vote.
So the lion is guilty. Interesting.
I hadn't read it and was going to between tonight/early morning. Hence my last post which if nothing else is NAI due to it being more of a "hey my activity sucks but this is why"In post 62, GuiltyLion wrote:their RVS comment about me feels awkward considering they voted elsewhere, and it's not clear from 55 whether they're read the thread or not. I think townies are slightly more likely to say whether they have or haven't read anything.
I do but not for any reason you have claimed. Personally I have an FOS on them just for doing what they did. Personally what does town gain my someone fake claiming a pr? Scum it makes sense to throw people off the case. Maybe it's the old person in me talking when I say that but it just doesn't sit right with me at all.In post 101, clidd wrote:I don't see a scenario which Scum!Menalque would bluff a claim with the risk of receiving a CC on the first day.
Do you ?
This is my only other time coming back in roughly a year plus. So no I don't know his games. Either way I don't care for it. I'm not one to go digging thru metas as well. Personally I think the claim comes off as arrogant.In post 114, clidd wrote:Hum, no. If you do, you probably never played withIn post 112, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:I do but not for any reason you have claimed. Personally I have an FOS on them just for doing what they did. Personally what does town gain my someone fake claiming a pr? Scum it makes sense to throw people off the case. Maybe it's the old person in me talking when I say that but it just doesn't sit right with me at all.In post 101, clidd wrote:I don't see a scenario which Scum!Menalque would bluff a claim with the risk of receiving a CC on the first day.
Do you ?Menalqueor watched one of his games.
This line bothers me. You act like I know who you are? Or anyone else in this game. This is the kind of stuff that I hate. It's almost like I should know who you are. Is how you are making this claim. This is the kind of stuff I hate. It feels like you are making a meta claim but hell I don't even know anymore.In post 121, clidd wrote:I can feel a degree of honesty in your lines, but I don't empathize with such view.It is beneficial for a VT to bluff being PR, as long as the player has significant notoriety and knows what he is doing. It is not logical for him to do this as scum precisely because of my presence in the game.He would not take a while to be lynched (not to mention that I have 3 possible associations in mind for this scenario).
This is what I didn't understand. Aside it all make sense now from your pov. Thanks for the clarification. Why did I show so much because honestly I'm an idiot sometimes and didn't read much into the setups. Yeah blame me this was a game to help me get back into the flow of games. I normally hang out in open setups on that note knowing what is happening.In post 123, clidd wrote:why do you show so much resistance to the simple conclusion that Menalque is a mason and is trying to solve the game ?
I myself want to know the answer to this. The vote and posts have read as town to me thus far and I'm not seeing the cause for concern.In post 132, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:What fence am I sitting on? I've said that the lack of an initial rvs vote isn't a bad thing.In post 129, 72offsuit wrote:Its not the not pressuting or not voting but rather the fence sitting.
This is my whole issue with this.In post 149, Iconeum wrote:the real thought here is rather:
if mena is scum, why would he wanna do this?
if mena is town, why would he wanna do this?
it makes no sense from either allignment
I never said they don't. And of course it will. I'm not saying it's fool proof or doesn't come from its own flaws.In post 160, Iconeum wrote:First off, LYL is overrated and will catch town at least equally as much as scum. Thinking town doesn't lie is just wrong. I'm not advocating town to lie, au contraire. But the sad sad truth is what it is.
From a reaction that you have to claim something 5 posts in the game. Get out.In post 198, Menalque wrote:Excellent, so Elmo is outed scum from his reaction
What terms?In post 294, WizenedWalrus wrote:terminology and abbreviations everyone is using here are foreign to me
In a game of mafia information is key. The less scum have the less they know about the setup.In post 305, WizenedWalrus wrote:For the moment, I'll go with VOTE: Elmo TeH AzN: as others have pointed out, she seemed to get unduly flustered by Menalque's SR of her.
Not what I'm getting at its the fact that why are we talking about PoE with no info other then subtle reads and no conf towns is all.In post 322, WizenedWalrus wrote:Isn't the point of the game to solve it? Why wouldn't we start on day one?In post 318, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Riddle me this. Why are we solving this game on day one?
This post bothers me in so many ways. But it's a play style thing I'm guessing. With not many votes being put and it's a towns biggest asset you want people to sheep behind you and follow your train of thought and put votes down and see how a wagon forms. This just screams scummy like lemme hide under the radar and play town as Puppets.In post 436, clidd wrote:To see how the votes would manifest without the influence of my vote.In post 435, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:...why?In post 432, clidd wrote:. No, my vote doesn't work like that. I'll be hammering or putting someone on L-1 today
In our last game, voting early ended up hurting my playstyle in some ways. I plan to fix that now.
If there's anything mafia has taught me. You don't line up lynches. You assess data and reassess data. I'm sorry I'm not one to follow someone blindly like you are already wanting. Personally I think armchair quarterbacking the town is the exact opposite of what we need to do.Atarashi Hajimari wrote:Ngl, I think you're barking up the wrong tree here. I agree with you on a personal level, but I think this is more of a meta/playstyle difference rather than alignment difference.In post 416, clidd wrote:I don't like your attitude of questioning everything we do. It seems like a mindset that is more inclined to emphasize the problem than the solution.In post 415, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Why are we lining up lynches?
And calling a policy lynch?
I'm just trying to understand this logic.
Quite the opposite I just want to hear more from other people. I'd like to see more votes for a VCA and other things. Useful for later in the game. Just the way this games been playing out feels like the meta is 100% different from the last time I played here is all. Note I'm not saying it's a bad thing.In post 442, clidd wrote:I appreciate how you put yourself in a position to criticize others, but you don't take a position to help the game.
It was more a prod dodge then anything...In post 470, 72offsuit wrote:Hm, missed this first time round. Have to agree with this read.In post 62, GuiltyLion wrote:Honestly I'm not getting a ton of scumvibes from anything major so far, I thought the push on Atarashi was overall worth probing but I don't think Atarashi comes off as scummy in the follow up. 72offsuit came to the wagon a little late and I'm curious to hear their answer to my question but I also don't think they're particularly scummy either.
I'll
VOTE: Elmo the AzN
their RVS comment about me feels awkward considering they voted elsewhere, and it's not clear from 55 whether they're read the thread or not. I think townies are slightly more likely to say whether they have or haven't read anything.
+ Scum points to Elmo here
What other stance is there? As someone who's replaced into slots before only to die within 24 hrs I find it a bit bleh to not.
Little over 3 days. 20+ pages. Unless we got a deadline which Im not sure you can get in newbie games but I could be wrong. Its a shame too.In post 609, Iconeum wrote:What other stance? How about trying to sort the slot based on actual activity and content rather then 'oh i'll just hammer so we definitely can't have any more content from that slot'In post 606, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:What other stance is there? As someone who's replaced into slots before only to die within 24 hrs I find it a bit bleh to not.
Pedit: In all fairness people have lives. Also activity shouldn't tell sides which side they are leaning on but what do I know.
Are you afraid of using your vote? Why? The fact that you have held your vote and just "played it safe" This is slightly worryingclidd wrote:I'm holding my vote for now. I don't want to use it early.
Evidently I'll be following your lead, so you don't have to worry about that.
1. Its not.In post 648, Iconeum wrote:No, you clearly said 'if they don't pick up their prod' I will hammer them. Did you use the word quickhammer ? No. But the act of hammering upon not picking up prod with 3 days (which is a lot) is in fact a quickhammer.
Justifying this with 'sparing the feelings of a player' is meaningless, because this is mafia after all. Even if a replacement only gets to post a couple times, it will be valuable for everyone upon flip.
Town logic is great sometimes. Because I'm saving the mod some effort you want to policy? This game.In post 651, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:So in the event eqsy flips green we lynch Elmo 10/10 times right?
No its called moving on with the game. The point is moot though.In post 660, Iconeum wrote:No. You want to lynch a slot before it has the chance to post. That's scummy. Period.In post 657, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Town logic is great sometimes. Because I'm saving the mod some effort you want to policy? This game.In post 651, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:So in the event eqsy flips green we lynch Elmo 10/10 times right?
Note less then 24 hours after their 1st post their head is already being served up. This is comedy. Regardless of the flip.In post 665, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:No its called moving on with the game. The point is moot though.In post 660, Iconeum wrote:No. You want to lynch a slot before it has the chance to post. That's scummy. Period.In post 657, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Town logic is great sometimes. Because I'm saving the mod some effort you want to policy? This game.In post 651, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:So in the event eqsy flips green we lynch Elmo 10/10 times right?
Lynch a spot that's said and done nothing with this game. Yet everyone was calling for the spot to be killed a few days ago when the person went AWOL. So it's scummy that I wanted the game to move on?
Seriously the logic behind this is such a fallacy I don't get it.
This was the best post I've read so far this game.In post 752, Menalque wrote:I just want it on the record that I knew you were waiting for this and let you take itIn post 750, Datisi wrote:vc
Hi pot. I'm now a kettle.In post 774, 72offsuit wrote:If its not doobie, then its elmo.
Zero town cred for hammering when clidd was also going to hammer.
Furthermore was going to deny us the replacement through threatening with a quickhammer on esqylootz, which would have denied us scums fake dying FoS list.
Can I just watch the other two townies fight in this one?
So Green flip you dead tomorrow?In post 791, 72offsuit wrote:Doobie was scummy as so i hammered so we wouldnt waver
Walrus just joined the wagon early.In post 793, Iconeum wrote:so who in the cage fight is scum exactly for you?
In post 807, Iconeum wrote:what turn?In post 805, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Right now I don't know what to think. This game just took a turn.
In post 808, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:The real turn is apparently Doobie wasn't hammered????
I think the whole thread got trolled but you know this is mafia.In post 809, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:omg I'm a dumbass, the L-1 vote was 72. So he trolled me real good.
You know. I'd refer you to something but I can't at the moment in why I pushed for that lynch. And would have 100/100 times in any other game.In post 818, Iconeum wrote:can you guys fight and talk about the important bits like how Elmo kept pushing that lynch/hammer but people like me were giving him crap over it?