^^In post 26, Something_Smart wrote:We are not going to have Day 1 of this game be a policy lynch
Do you know how bad it would feel to be singled out in a 50-player game like that?
I get that StK isn't the nicest of people, but yeah.
^^In post 26, Something_Smart wrote:We are not going to have Day 1 of this game be a policy lynch
Do you know how bad it would feel to be singled out in a 50-player game like that?
Oh snapIn post 46, Elsa Jay wrote:It has a number in it. People with numbers in their username are ten times more likely to be evil.In post 42, Egix96 wrote:VOTE: eth0s
I spent way too long reading the playerlist and his name just jumped out at me for some reason.
Did you see me agreeing with what Smart said?In post 51, Nero Cain wrote:Egix96 why not join the glorious TSE wagon?
It's eejicks smhIn post 53, Elsa Jay wrote:Yeah watch out Egi Ex Ninety Six for those dang number folk, you hear?
I think it's supposed to be short for "DS jester"In post 165, Elsa Jay wrote:Oh god an actual jumble of letters. Fuck that.
VOTE: Dsjstr
I dont wanna remember a username like that. Can't even pronounce it. It's the devil's language.
In post 168, Almost50 wrote:Grant me access to you PT NOW or I'll assume you're scum.In post 148, profii wrote:Ah, the game has 6 pages before I even found the thread... this will be interesting
P.S. Don't read too much into that, I am NOT hinting.crumbing anything.
I think you're being greedy, A50.In post 169, insomnia wrote:me and a50 are masons
VOTE: HecticIn post 171, Hectic wrote:First things first: I HATE Day 1. It's the worst part of the game and I usually try to get by without posting a single time in this day phase. So if someone could lolhammer as SOON a possible, that's be very helpful.
I'm saying, if you already had one PT, why would you want another? But all right.In post 175, Almost50 wrote:Not really. It's always good to know where profii's thought are (as either alignment)
You're right, that vote does seem awfully convenient.In post 214, profii wrote:No you dontIn post 213, Jackal711 wrote:So this has started. And at 9 pages already, Which honestly seems low for a game this big even though it's only been 4 hours.
I see a lot of fluff but do have one solid scumread.
VOTE: TrueSoulEnergy
That doesn't seem very fun though...In post 262, BBmolla wrote:VOTE: No Lynch
Unless half this player list is down to lynch garmr scum
I really think this is the right day 1 move just with how impossible it will be to create wagons
Sry, missed thisIn post 273, BBmolla wrote:Actually, better idea
VOTE: insomnia
I’m just gonna vote top poster all day
Last post, see you in 24 hours
I personally saw it as a WotC vote, fwiwIn post 302, profii wrote:because this is a lol-game, so let's have a lol wagon
or at least, that's my take on it
There was one game I played which Wake was in for a brief spell (Big Four) but no, I hadn't made the connection.In post 664, tictac wrote:He's doing a Wake impersonation.In post 402, Yiley wrote:I'll need to go see if hectic plays every d1 like this but for someone who claims to be lurking/observing he is posting a lot of nothing
Have u never played with Wake?
@Egix: u too
there was someone i meantto ask this of, butI don't remember who.
Unrelated: I approve of the fact that there is a w with a circumflex accent in this postIn post 667, tictac wrote: ŵould lynch these, Egix or SS and be happy.
would lynch A50, and do a little dance, always.
would lynch, and go 'meh' if ya flip town: maybe notallof the rest of yall?
pew pewIn post 839, Hectic wrote:*new
I will accept a day vig shot for that mistake. Anything to get me out of this day phase.
I'll take your word for it.In post 953, davesaz wrote:That feels like town A50. Obviously preliminary.
In post 1159, Amrun wrote: Is Kirari Krazy? Seems like Krazy.
I think it’s an empty argument. They’re both arguing about some dumb shit. Drixx is acting like it’s impossible to have a gut read, and Kirari kind of fluffing up gut reads.
I don’t know Drixx very well, but from my experience, he is very logical and probably does not do gut reads very often. Still, he should recognize that others do.
Kirari, if Krazy, is closer to town meta if so but not definitive based on what I’ve read so far.
This is a similar impression to what I got yeah.In post 1160, Amrun wrote:So in other words, gun to my head I’d say TvT.
It could be TvS or different scum vs different scum but I don’t think they’re scum together.
Seems like a good opportunity to start sharing them thenIn post 1343, profii wrote:I think it's easier to get town reads in this game than scum reads and I'm not a big share-er when it comes to those
Idk about the other two but this is decentIn post 1360, profii wrote:I like garmr,In post 1351, Egix96 wrote:Seems like a good opportunity to start sharing them thenIn post 1343, profii wrote:I think it's easier to get town reads in this game than scum reads and I'm not a big share-er when it comes to those, hectic, probably more but after footy maybedave, a50
I did think about neros comment that if scum want to hunt scum then if I make cases that people are town, scum can help my goal of eliminating scum I guess
I dunno
VOTE: profiiIn post 1398, Nero Cain wrote:not really. There are tons of players doing squat all like profii, egix, jamella etc.
No one... but that's because I didn't need permissionIn post 1405, Hectic wrote:Oi, how dare you. Who gave you permission to move your vote off of me?In post 1400, Egix96 wrote:VOTE: profiiIn post 1398, Nero Cain wrote:not really. There are tons of players doing squat all like profii, egix, jamella etc.
Okay, are you happy now?
I agree on NK15, but why for the first two?In post 1739, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I would also lynch Elsa Jay, bob, or NK15 today
Requoting with bold for visibility
I think I once randomly looked at a newbie game where an SE (that's right, not even a new player) fell for a hammertest gambitIn post 1854, Something_Smart wrote:Reaction tests are good against the person being hammered?
That's news to me.
The issue is that I don't see why any sensible person would do that...In post 1864, Something_Smart wrote:I've also seen atownie fakeclaim scumafter what he thought was a hammer on someone else and subsequently get speedlynched. Just because it worked once doesn't mean it's good in general.
Honestly I don't blame you.In post 1871, chkflip wrote:I'm not reading anything before this post.
But 1866 is less than 1871In post 1873, chkflip wrote:In post 1866, Amrun wrote:Worth being said that tracker could easily also be scum so like. -shrug-
Yeah exactlyIn post 1916, AaronFrost wrote:There wasn't much opinion expressed behind Dolly's vote though, it was just... a naked vote
Was it really necessary to list every single instance when it should have been obvious her list was randomised just from the first three points alone?In post 1874, gobbledygook wrote: - Dolly put herself in her scum reads.
- Dolly put a player who has not posted as her second highest town read
- Dolly put Rhinox as her third highest town read when all that Rhinox had posted up until Dolly's reads list was hi
- Dolly put pisskop as her sixth highest townread when he had not posted yet
- Dolly put EeveeLution Army as her seventh highest townread for this string of postsSpoiler: EeveeLution Army
- Dolly put ar98mubarik as her eighth highest townread when that player had not posted in the game yet
- Dolly put VaultDweller as her highest townlean when he had not posted in the game yet
- Dolly put QuantumQuasar as her third highest townlean when that player had not posted in the game yet
- Dolly put eth0s as her sixth highest townlean read when he had not posted in the game yet
- Dolly put clidd as her seventh highest townlean read when he had not posted in the game yet
- Dolly put Jamelia as her eighth highest townlean read for 653 and 655
- Dolly put SRex as her ninth highest townlean read for 100
- Dolly put Emperor_FlippyNips as her third highest scumlean for 389
- Dolly put Pine as her fourth highest scumlean when he had not posted in the game yet
- Dolly put Amrun as her eleventh highest scumlean for 270
- Dolly put Insomnia as her second highest scumread
- Dolly put hersho as her third highest scumread when that player had not posted in the game yet
- Dolly put Jackal as her ninth highest scum read for 213
- Dolly put Uncrowned as her eleventh highest scumread for 618
- Dolly put Non Imh as her fifteenth highest scumread for 428, 466, and 483.
- Dolly put Not Known 15 as her sixteenth highest scumread when he had not posted in the game yet
- Dolly put Golden Robster as her nineteenth highest scumread when he had not posted in the game yet
Idk, maybe she legit thought it would actually lynch Rex?In post 1922, Nero Cain wrote:Dolly is a big pile of null but does scum make an attention-getting vote like that?
I think that now would be a good opportunity for me to say...In post 1875, Hectic wrote:First things first, I hate Day 1. It's the worst part of the game for me and I struggle during it. It's part of my current meta to hang back during Day 1, and then really start engaging during Day 2 and on. Day 1 I've got nothing concrete to work with, so I observe more than post during it. Typically people react as you might expect, shrieking that yours truly is Scum because if it.
If that is her, then I would be a tad disappointed ngl.In post 1929, chkflip wrote:Dolly Parton is obv an alt. I think it might be mastina.
Oh lol. And yes, that is fair I guess.In post 1934, Something_Smart wrote:It was Flavor Leaf, so yes, I agree with youIn post 1914, Egix96 wrote:The issue is that I don't see why any sensible person would do that...
That said, it's also sensible to not claim scum as scum when you think you're hammered, so that argument goes both ways.
Thanks for the reminderIn post 1938, gobbledygook wrote:I used this exact reasoning in a newbie game when I claimed vanilla town as reason that I should not lynched. I was still lynched.In post 1930, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Do you guys think any wagoned scum would claim anything but a super duper powerful role that sounds awesome for town?
People do not listen to reason.
I said why though...? I just don't feel like it demands the same level of rigour as when you're making a case for someone's alignment, or anything of that sort.In post 1940, gobbledygook wrote:Yes. Why do you think it was unnecessary?In post 1924, Egix96 wrote:Was it really necessary to list every single instance when it should have been obvious her list was randomised just from the first three points alone?In post 1874, gobbledygook wrote:
When you put it that way yesIn post 1961, gobbledygook wrote:Was that not a case for someone's alignment?
I think you're ignoring the context of the situation. By putting that effort into Dolly's readslist I exposed two things: 1) Dolly's readlist is a bunch of bologna, and 2) Hectic's read on Dolly (and his readslist by extension) is a bunch of bologna.
I mean of cooouuurseIn post 1881, gobbledygook wrote: Also, Dolly admitted her readslist was serious.
Please join this wagon.In post 757, Dolly Parton wrote:Of course its serious.In post 668, Garmr wrote:@Dolly is your reads list serious or a randomized joke?
In post 2003, QuantumQuasar wrote:VOTE: Elsa Jay
no role moonlogic
Black Ranger seems clear.I'm not in a neighborhood.
One lynch vs four factions?
How is Nero, BBmolla, AF, A50, davesaz, EJ and S_
Because of scum having killing on the brain?In post 2062, Nero Cain wrote:how would that even be a scumslip?
WhEn PeOpLe WrItE lIkE tHiS, dOn'T tAkE iT lItErAlLyIn post 2065, gobbledygook wrote:The last time someone jumped on me saying something I did was a scum slip, they were scum. Are you scum here, Chkflip?
I don't feel like Nbee/A50/insom belong in thisIn post 2334, Nero Cain wrote:I'd shed 0 tears if any of the following wound up dead tonight
kagesong
NorwegianboyEE
Pine
pisskop
Jamelia
Almost50
Not Known 15
QuantumQuasar
insomnia
TrueSoulEnergy
dsjstr
SausasaurusRex
The Fonz
profii
Amrun
Egix96
AaronFrost
clidd
VaultDweller
Not just due to lack of content, but it seemed quite bottom-of-the-barrel that NK was posting only to point out perceived scumslips and nothing else.In post 2686, Black Ranger wrote:If you agree on NK15 (presumably due to a lack of content) why are you agreeing with CSF, king of shitting out no content and being scum by omission?In post 1827, Egix96 wrote:I agree on NK15, but why for the first two?In post 1739, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I would also lynch Elsa Jay, bob, or NK15 today
In post 2621, Black Ranger wrote:I was town butmy role wasn't very importantand I thought being leashed was worth less than just getting shit canned out of the game like this
Maybe I can sneak some reads in
In post 2660, Black Ranger wrote:If I wanted to pretend to be an SKI would have claimed vig (which I never so much as softed)and said some bullshit but like I said being leashed by 25 active players (most either scum or dumb) has a worse pay out for town opposed to getting lynched like this.
My "loudspeaker in the scum PT" post about hidden scum before the player list was posted might have been an obvious PR tell. Think of it what you will.
Show me where pls, when I find-on-page 'vig' in your iso I'm not seeing itIn post 2790, Black Ranger wrote:I claimed vig sweet peaIn post 2785, Titus wrote:I don't believe that. I feel it's a convenient excuse. TPR is not a claim.In post 2783, Almost50 wrote:@Titus/@Nor: We are not moving away from BR because of his TPR claim. We are moving off him because he gave reads in a manner that looked more town-motivated than not when he thought he was already hammered.
In the same post that I mentioned I may have pr told in the hood with the "hidden scum / no hood playerlist" thought.
Wait maybe it was thisIn post 2753, Black Ranger wrote:Well, is Jackal lockscum from not posting in the hood? This is only something you and KM should know;In post 2750, Nero Cain wrote:What does the argument for Dave have to do with my vote?In post 2746, Black Ranger wrote:and if the argument from tictac is that convincing, why is Nero going for Dave?not Tictac. You can still go for Dave, but we need to know, because if you want a more interesting lynch I could, ahem, make Jackal disappear tonight?
It's the Cowbells effect.In post 2764, Drixx wrote:This is asinine. "Drixx is good, so let's lynch him to satisfy my paranoia and laziness in reading him."In post 2629, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:And Drixx has carried as scum in larges before
I don't really trust him at this point
GTFO with that nonsense.
In post 2468, NorwegianboyEE wrote:How about we just lynch Black Ranger. And if he’s town we look at the scummiest wagon joins. If he’s scum, woo we got scum.
Either way we gain some information, and that’s much better than going on with a 50 player council of bickering. We’d also see if wagon redirects were scum motivated or not.
Anyway, just consider it.
I’ll hammer if the wagon get’s to L-1.
In post 2778, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I think the interesting dynamic of people resisting the lynch, vs people pushing it will give some very decent reads for the next day phase. So i'm willing to follow this line of reasoning.In post 2774, Titus wrote:Let's hurry up and finish the BR lynch. The resistance right before claim spot screams not town. Don't you guys think scum would ensure we got that claim before backing off if BR was town?
VOTE: Black Ranger
You're losing serious house points for these.In post 2795, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Oh, why didn't i notice this sooner.In post 2790, Black Ranger wrote:I claimed vig
VOTE: Non Imh
Well suppose we'd vote someone else then.
I've played with this slot multiple times and their performance has always been lacking.
Did his response to being ""hammered"" really give you no pause?In post 2888, chkflip wrote:Why aren't we lynching Ranger?
In post 2944, NorwegianboyEE wrote:So? I'm serious as scum. Get yo facts straight guy.In post 2934, Egix96 wrote:You're losing serious house points for these.
Well you can hardly expect me to know that when you were town in what was (IIRC) our only prior common game.In post 2945, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'd probably tryhard this much more if i was scum. Being town in a 50 player game is boring.
Tbf insom is probably used to MU mashes, which evolved from POG mashes, where mafia vigilantes are a staple roleIn post 2993, Elsa Jay wrote:Also, Normal Games make it so Vigilantes have to be town. If this was a Large theme I'd give it to you but it's not.In post 2987, Something_Smart wrote:That's called a serial killer, and we know there's one in the game already.In post 2923, insomnia wrote:A scum vig.
In post 3727, Drixx wrote:I find GG's argument for outing hood members to be solid. It's called "The Palace of Darkness" (Yes, really).
The Fonz
Pine
Drixx
Psyche
NotaJumbleofNumbers
insomnia
Black Ranger
ar98mubarik
In post 3728, gobbledygook wrote:You had 7 people too!?
It's eight names tho?In post 3729, Elsa Jay wrote:Seems like all 3 hoods had 7 people then. Neat.
Please don't be offended when I say this, but it's just that you seem to have... very weird thoughts.In post 4911, QuantumQuasar wrote:Fonz you're pretending to not understand when we need facts that A) we need a central forum and base for an anchor of trust and B) we need facts from reliable sources that are crosschecked.
The way I communicate is a playstyle just like any other, I invoke my right of the 5th amendment against self-incrimination