In post 285, Ame wrote:
@
Taly
1. How do you find Yshtola's Fuzzy vote suspicious? She didn't need reasoning because she was just wagoning with you as requested. It's weird to me that you kept pressing her for reasoning when it was obvious she had none.
2. How had I not posted anything BUT fluff up until now? This is really weird. Like all my opening posts were non-game related and being silly. And the only game-related thing I really posted was a naked read list with no elaboration.
1)
Not sure if suspicious is the best word, I didn't expect that
Y'shtola
would follow my vote and practically said I was accountable for it. I was trying to see their playstyle or at least get some form of solve going for them but they haven't done anything that outright strikes me as scum-motivated but they also haven't done anything that shows a lot of autonomy in their thoughts. I do actually agree with
pops
about
Y'shtola's
passivity but there's other players that I'm wanting to push, so I'm just engaging/pressuring her hoping to a get a foothold about her slot.
2)
You came in voting and giving reads, your presence sparked a bit of conversational activity the other night and your entrance actually helped me form some of my reads a bit better. Naked readslist aren't necessarily void of information and that's why I've been prodding you for more nuanced opinions since entered the thread with confident reads I agree with
pops/eyestott/robb/paragon (weaker now)
. I also want your opinions so I can dive into your thought process to help me solve you. Even when you have any fluffy posts, they're not convoluted and are easy to follow, and you ask questions consistently. My take on your posting is that it's not meant to make the game harder to read by its presence. That's a trait of an actively engaged player.
In post 290, popsofctown wrote:No one has PTs with just the town aligned players, so why are attempts at deception necessarily targeted at other townies and not the mafia?
VOTE: Robbnva for a potential perspective slip.
I also have a post restriction to my role, but it doesn't trigger unless Y'shtola votes me.
Yo, Y'shtola, mind voting Pops and testing this claim?
Also, I don't vibe with
Robb
scum here?? He has no developed opinion about tunneling people beyond he knows its part of his personality, which he even acknowledges how that may harm a game... This doesn't strike me as scum using their gamestyle to cause chaos as
Robb
would be less self-aware or even more aggressive.
Robb
has not diffused responsibility from this behavior yet, so I don't think it's scum-indicative.
And why do you care about mafia being deceived? Or are you trying to say that
Robb
is scum covering up a lie that's directed to his supposed partners?
I'm genuinely confused by your train of thought. Help.
This was asked 3 times while
pops
was present in the thread and ignored all those times.
pops
, if you're going to try and defend another person's claim with your own claim - when both claims argue against the mechanic of Normals - could you least try to be transparent?
In post 388, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Yeah,I meant post dodge but my brain froze- ugh
I don't get Paragons post restriction bit as it has been confirmed that Post restrictions are non-normal. So either he either doing it for fun or he has a role that requires him to lie.
Either seems likely at this point. Speaking of Paragon if he flips town then I would bet that there is at least one scum maybe two on that wagon. I am not if any scum might be bussing as it a hard thing to tell early in the game. There seems to be quite a few jumping on the Paragon wagon with no to little reason which makes me a bit nervous about his wagon
I played with the Great Boon last game.....It was very entertaining, I can confirm that he does all those things.
Oh ok- I played Rob . Played against his alt Wimpy and Jake from state farm. Been a while though so I don't remember much about his playstyle
This was a lot of very little, any thoughts aside from just one person?
In post 396, eyestott wrote:Someone please engage with me in a way where I can treat this like a NORMAL game of mafia
I wanna have a conversation with someone and develop some townreads. I think my mind needs calibration because right now I don’t think I’m actually townreading anyone
I'm done with anything regarding roles, I don't how the fuck we got to discussing claims when nobody entered L1 at least.
I don't feel strongly about several votes on
Paragon
, I don't think his claim makes sense as scum alone, but I'm feeling iffy on
pops'
reply to it. I am less confident in
Paragon
town though.
I scumread
pops
, you can ISO quickly and read from
187 to
211 for the progression why.
Fuzzy
has done nothing but is present.
Taco
has done nothing and isn't present.
I think you're town as you actually make sense as opposed to a good portion of the playerlist.
Ame
is probably town as I don't think she entered constructing this powerplay narrative, it feels like coherent gamesolving. I don't want to lynch.
Wiisp
is probably town as he's had some of the least popular opinions in the game and nobody has quickly gamesolved with him, based on his interactions, I like his perspective for town. I don't want to lynch.
Robb
is probably town for reasons I defended him in this post above. Leaning toward not lynching.
I can see a world where
Rabid
is town but I don't know why they haven't even hinted at the other wagons or even townreads, his push could be genuine or forced.
I still don't quite know about
Y'shtola
tbh, I think not lynching D1 would yield a better look into their alignment?
Alo
hasn't really pinged me yet, I'm going to need to reread him. What's your take there?
In post 433, Yshtola Rhul wrote: In post 429, eyestott wrote:Am I going crazy? How on earth is it that TWO SEPARATE PEOPLE are claiming posting restrictions in a normal game?
It can’t be a coincidence can it?
Pedit: I give up.
VOTE: Popsofctown
Will remove my vote once Yshtola votes Beyoncé here
Pops is joking.
Paragon is pretending that his self-imposed restriction is official.
It is as simple as that.
How did you conclude this?
p-edit
popsofctown wrote:Did two people replace out because I fake claimed a post restriction? I just don't understand
wtf