[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 11700995 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 932: A Normal Blitz - Game Over - Mafiascum.net
In our most hellish sanction of viral quarantine of trepidation, we must steel ourselves against the tide of night-lurking mobsters who cling to the shadows like an unforeseen disease. Listen to me brothers, for together we shall purge this influx of HEATHENS by our combined shining light of towniness.
This promise of honor, tradition, and questionable moral reasoning of murder is one I plan to hold accustom to within the deep fabric of my pulsing heart. It is with a strong sense of self-rightness that I, De pope de pope HoldenGolden, thou does point thy finger, of most divine authority and power, at humaneatingmonkey. The morbid delicacies that thou does't feast upon, indicated in the scripture of his username, is indisputely akin to the murdering of sc-HEATHENS!
VOTE: humaneatingmonkey
Applications for my crusade against the darktimes are open! Please have at least 3 years worth of crusading experience and utter holy proficiency with Microsoft excel.
In post 22, Datisi wrote:Not really. I was hard TRing him in that game (and was correct), but a while ago i got familiar with some of his scumgames, and eh... I'll be having trouble getting a read of Holden i think.
You often do meta research like this?
When was this "awhile ago"? I haven't played in ~6 months.
In short, while I agree with the verdict as tonally I find myself hard to read apart of a few weird mannerisms, I found the construction of the post feeling artificial when I first read it.
To me, the "while ago" apart felt crammed in to provide additional justification as to why you weren't sure about it besides me tonally being hard to read. The future prediction of me being hard to read felt forced and still sorta does to allow you to fall on either side of the fence. As if you were also differing judgement until you heard from Shiki's view on it.
Rereading it though and with the way you followed up with questioning Shiki's method rather trying to use it to capitalize a read onto me or even possibly her puts me more at ease over the post.
In post 26, Datisi wrote:Have you researched others in the game (other than Luca)?
yes, i researched the player list, though some more extensively than others.
You and I are going to get along great.
In post 32, HoldenGolden wrote:Fair enough. I would be more alarmed if you said a more recent time-frame
This is suspicious to me. Why would he state a more recent time if it doesn't exist?
You are correct that there is no more recent games from me.
However the question was when he acquainted himself with my games. Aka, I was testing to see if it was actually a legit reason from him which I think so since he gave a more precise and believable time
In post 26, Datisi wrote:Have you researched others in the game (other than Luca)?
yes, i researched the player list, though some more extensively than others.
You and I are going to get along great.
In post 32, HoldenGolden wrote:Fair enough. I would be more alarmed if you said a more recent time-frame
This is suspicious to me. Why would he state a more recent time if it doesn't exist?
You are correct that there is no more recent games from me.
However the question was when he acquainted himself with my games. Aka, I was testing to see if it was actually a legit reason from him which I think so since he gave a more precise and believable time
I see. But why does the timeframe matter if he had a reason for looking at the game either way? If he said he reviewed the game for research in a more recent game, would you find it suspicious?
It has nothing to do with the reason to meta me. Allow me to expand further
*Put on your big brain hats, takes a deep breath*
As you can see at the top of this page there was a span of 2 minutes between me posing the question and his answer. This is important as here are two examples of the answers I am expecting:
"It was back when you were playing"
vs
"I read 1944 for newbie 1952"
If I am gauging if he was being artificial about his view on me, then one of these clearly sounds more scummy then the other. The former is open ended, vague, and easily bullshitable. The other meanwhile is precise and narrow scoped. Factor in the short time frame in the response to the question and with it being more what I expect if he was being truthful, then I am left with a pretty easy conclusion. Yes, this is assuming that 2 mins is not enough time to make the response to it, but that's the philosophical razor for you
Now a question of my own: What do you make of it now given my rational? Ball is back in your court
why did you ask george, specifically? was it because he was the only one you assumed to be around outside of yourself, datisi and me? or was there more to it?
Nailed it
I prefer social interaction over reading old games.
In post 11, HoldenGolden wrote:Applications for my crusade against the darktimes are open! Please have at least 3 years worth of crusading experience and utter holy proficiency with Microsoft excel.
I only use SUMIFS, never SUMIF, and INDEXMATCHES. All other formulas are pretty useless.
Vote: GeorgeBailey
Starbucks are liberal bastions.
As long as they can calculate the exponential growth of dead bodies i'll put you on the list of applicants.
While you are correct on your commentary of Starbucks, I praise thy to remember the holy testament of at least its not insta-made microwave coffee *shudders from childhood trauma*
In post 26, Datisi wrote:Have you researched others in the game (other than Luca)?
yes, i researched the player list, though some more extensively than others.
You and I are going to get along great.
In post 32, HoldenGolden wrote:Fair enough. I would be more alarmed if you said a more recent time-frame
This is suspicious to me. Why would he state a more recent time if it doesn't exist?
You are correct that there is no more recent games from me.
However the question was when he acquainted himself with my games. Aka, I was testing to see if it was actually a legit reason from him which I think so since he gave a more precise and believable time
I see. But why does the timeframe matter if he had a reason for looking at the game either way? If he said he reviewed the game for research in a more recent game, would you find it suspicious?
It has nothing to do with the reason to meta me. Allow me to expand further
*Put on your big brain hats, takes a deep breath*
As you can see at the top of this page there was a span of 2 minutes between me posing the question and his answer. This is important as here are two examples of the answers I am expecting:
"It was back when you were playing"
vs
"I read 1944 for newbie 1952"
If I am gauging if he was being artificial about his view on me, then one of these clearly sounds more scummy then the other. The former is open ended, vague, and easily bullshitable. The other meanwhile is precise and narrow scoped. Factor in the short time frame in the response to the question and with it being more what I expect if he was being truthful, then I am left with a pretty easy conclusion. Yes, this is assuming that 2 mins is not enough time to make the response to it, but that's the philosophical razor for you
Now a question of my own: What do you make of it now given my rational? Ball is back in your court
I like your reasoning, but neither of those answers is a more recent time frame. You stated that you would be alarmed if he had given a more recent time frame. What would that have looked like?
Ah I see the confusion now; I would be alarmed in that case for similar reasons. Datisi really has no real reason inbetween 1 month into my hiatus to a month before it ended (remember it was "awhile ago", not two nights ago) to randomly decide "hey remember HoldenGolden? I am going to read up on his meta for no reason!"
Therefore unless it was a very good reason why, I would instantly found anything of the sort scummy asf because it would be bullshit.
In post 60, Hiraki wrote:What's the point of this conversation? Are you going to SR him or something?
Whats the point of withholding the discussion about your pings on Datisi?
EDIT: are you now thinking its because your style's dont mix well or is there more behind your view on Datisi?
In post 71, Madoka wrote:Bugs and Holden, are you having difficulty seeing any particular color?
Blue works fine. The green and worse that yellow with the funky highlighting makes it hard for me to read and retain what you said.
Spoiler: Monkeys read post
In post 87, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Shiki - first non-RVS with an 'eh' reason. good questions, but that's not what makes town. towncreds for meta effort though. i'm not sure if scum goes to the game and says "well im gonna research their meta and make fake townreads based on that, so i can be seen as town."
Datisi - his posts in the early game feels like he's trying too hard to appear like he's trying.
bugspray - said something weird, but that's not what makes scum.
Question to both Datisi and bugspray: Why is Luca Blight town?
Luca Blight - withholding my read.
Holden - not answering's Madoka's questions properly, but could just be tired.
Question: You really think Datisi was pocketing you?
Madoka - Good questions, but that's not what makes town.
Hiraki - i'm getting some scum-cornered vibes.
George Bailey - pops in and out, had the opportunity to hunt a bit, diasppointed that he didn't. not getting a lot of "excited to know more about the town" vibes from him.
How many scum do you think we have in this setup? Is there a possibility of third-party factions?
I had to stop my catch up because this post feels incredibly scummy due to the nature of being wishy washy filler. This is a lot of words ultimately to call the majority of the reads neutral or conflicted. Allow me to make the synopsis of this post:
Shiki: weak townread
Datisi: scum lean without committing to saying scum lean
Bugspray: scummy but not scummy
Luca blight: pay dlc to unlock read
Holden: scummy but not scummy
Madoka: towny but not towny
Hiraki: actually seems like a scum lean
George: he doesnt seem like town
So 3 are x reasons he backtracks on, 1 is withhold, 2 are scum leans without him actually committing to the scumlean, and 2 can actually be considered actual reads
This shows the problem I have: it feels he was pressured to make content and thus made a list post to make it seem like he was doing so when in fact the majority of it is filler. The wishywashy nature of it was exactly what I had concerns about with Datisi post earlier about setting up ways to push plays as scum. He leaves 6 reads very open where 4 can be considered soft pushes (Datisi, George, me, and bugs) for mislynches later on if those people gain traction let alone the withholding read and the scum lean on Hiriki given him more options.
In short, I think the crusade strangly worked and I feel strong scum vibes from this post.
And to answer HEM question, no, tis a joke as he is the only player I played with.
So I ended up just pausing and isoing HEM and now I'm sorta confused.
He has Datisi wagon going but doesnt seem interested in directly pushing her aside from starting the wagon (not asking content driving questions nor and the only interaction I see past that is him defending the wagon and responding to one of Datisi questions which was about RQS).
Yet enters Hiraki and HEM read on him which is a scum lean. HEM seems very much still thinking this is the case yet Hiraki is not included in the wagon discussion where HEM talking about switching to Bugs. Furthermore, it takes an elongated time for HEM to switch to Hiraki. His read on Datisi, by his own admission, is gut read. Yet, he debates with Hiraki about voting him when his read on Hitaki should be more logically stronger (OMGUS, corner scum, etc.)
It all feels very unnatural in the case of a read progression which further supports him being scum. I'm not sure why he engages with Hiraki so much prior to the vote but the only discussion about Datisi is why she is scum rather than interrogating her. It feels more he is worried about the strength of his reads rather than necessarily solving the game (scum wants to validate their reads more since they know its fabricated).
Thoughts by anyone on what I raised so far? I'm on moblie so it's hard to quote the 8 or so posts by HEM that show this.
i'm trying to imagine that I'm Datisi, and what can I do early game to make it seem like I'm gamesolving
— but really I'm actually just getting early towncred. His early questions doesn't feel like town trying to find scum. was it the winning exciting narrative that I think would yield productive discussion going in Day 1? Yes. do I strongly believe it? No.
I will say I do understand this suppose approach (as I do tend to try to compare AI points in a person's motive to post along with the content), through my previous points still stand.
Im not sure what to make of hiraki. Tonally I can understand both a case for town and scum with a lean onto town believe it or not. Although bad practice, I was tempted to lump him and HEM together for HEM's non-wanting to push Hiraki despite the read until that interaction. I suck at differing TvS vs SvS (as I think HEM is scum for reasons above) interactions but I am finding it hard to think that the two would interact like that in thread in the case of SvS (even assuming they don't have day talk). Therefore I'm finding Hiraki townie (TL) even if it hinges somewhat on that interaction.
If anyone has a rationale for why HEM is town please speak up.
----------------
Madoka I too would like to hear your reads and all that are not neutral unless there is a good reason you are on the fence for somebody. Especially for the three people you listed.
In post 191, Hiraki wrote:Ahhh shiiiitttt deus vult mofos, he gets it
Watch your tongue, Deus Vult Motherfucka is both mine and Samuel L Jackson's line.
Although I would like the discussion on HEM to continue, I am interested to hear your opinions on other players not name HEM. Do you have any since your interaction with Luca earlier?
Holden, you fully caught up? opinion on players who are not monkey/hiraki?
Hot Takes: hiraki and holden probably town.
Do note I have a virtual interview in 30 mins (god save me), so I be afk/have to pause reading to get ready.
Yet so far not much to say:
Luca is british. Does that matter? Yes. Means that me and him share a stereotypical love for tea (though I prefer mine heavily sweeten). I'm ok giving a town lean to him at this current moment, IE, I don't feel scum motivation in how he asked questions towards people. I think scum!luca could of been more aggressive with his questioning along with pushing Hiraki more daringly. Once he mounts up something akin to a case against someone I can revisit and judge accordingly.
Yes I did see the meta point raised about him; No, I do not care about meta for players I have not played with and in general.
Everybody else I am null/debating in my head further.
Spoiler: TLDR waiting for more
George/Mao color person/shiki I do not have strong feeling for either way. First 2 from lack of posts having major AI, latter due to waiting on seeing how the transition from pre-game meta analysis to in-game logic/tonal analysis works out. It has started, but not onto a scope for a read.
Bugs gets separated by virtue of the wagon's focus on him, though is similar to George and Mao. They feel rambly during the whole lamist thing and I feel taking stock based off later posts will be better.
Surprisingly I don't have an good read on you, hence why after my interview I'm going to look at your posts a bit more.
Blah, I think I got the position but we shall see.
In post 205, Luca Blight wrote:@Datisi: ‘Contradictory’ was in reference to Monkey’s stance on Bugs - he doesn’t like your vote as Bugs hasn’t been scummy yet he approves of the pressure on Bugs.
I didn’t particularly ‘like’ Monkey’s Datisi explanation, but I can see where he’s coming from (I’ve already said I didn’t like your opening much either).
As for my read on Monkey,
I was beginning to TR him towards the end of his argument with Hiraki,
but I’ll need to ISO before I’m confident on that read.
What do you make of my arguments then?
@Bugs, Kool about George.
Im not quite sure I follow your points about Shiki? And if George is afk for longer than mods will do their job, or if not enough time is left, we can mount a wagon later in the day.
I will also say the wagon(s) are anything but stagnant in terms of the analysis since we are only ~14 hours in and have moved votes quite a bit and the thread is still discussing multiple people.
pedit: Datisi, I can explain the theory behind it if you are done questioning bugs about it (hate to get in the way of good prodding).
The theory is rooted in VCA mixed with thread review. From my understanding, if there is a clear majority (4 main wagon with 1-2 on sub wagons) or if there is an equal and unmoving spread (3 2 vote wagons for example) the main wagon is thought to be stagnant if it remains like that with little change in the thread's opinion on the wagon(s). People might be posting that Y and Z are scum along with X, but X is still the person they vote for.
Assuming a few factors such as X is not scum, then this is advantageous for scum. They have a mislynch, are spreading the seeds for other lynches afterwards, and they don't have to stick they neck out to save a buddy or secure it. Since the thread is focus on lynching that person, it also tends to take heat off them. Compare this to when one of their members are in the main wagon's against a townie and, upon review either post game or later in the game, the members of the mafia not being vote are sticking their necks out to vote the other wagon thus saving their teammate.
For me, it falls apart because the timeframe is not something easy to notice in the moment while playing and tends to me more noticeable after the phase it occurs in. Furthermore, it is also assuming scum does not just bus their partner and that there are multiple scum alive to actively derail the wagon on their partner. Plus some scum are most likely going to remain on the scum buddy wagon if the defense does not work well. One scum alone really can't shift off the pressure any differently than a town can in this context.
Besides, It also has only been 15~ hours so not nearly enough time to call it stagnate let alone when considering what has been happening in the game.
In post 228, Madoka wrote:Holden, do you have a form of color blindness?
The color blind reference is a nod to my brother who has it and would subsequently flip the fuck out.
I do however have a condition(s) [generalized reading disorder + Written dysgraphia which while mostly affecting my own writing, does impact my grammatical understanding of other's writing] that makes it difficult to read the green/yellow with this black background both in reading speed and actually retaining the info. It is fine using those colors if it is just one word, but entire paragraphs blend together and will make it difficult to analyze any long post if you choose those colors. The blue is not perfect, but much more tolerable.
Why did you choose to draw focus then to Shiki as opposed to other players in the game? I understand not having a read on Mr. starbucks, but you did not really clear the shiki part of it with that post.
In post 230, Madoka wrote:Interesting. I wont post in blue either then.
Hiraki, what does SI and NB mean?
Thanks, I appreciate it.
It indeed gets very interesting when you put those 2 along with the other 2 communication related disorders I have lol. Made public speaking a fun class.
Pedit: Wait I am confuse bug, your wagon only has 3 with 2 2 value wagons and 1 wagon (mine) on HEM?
I did not realize he was using the theory to push he was town because the wagon ON HIM was stagnant 0.O?
Hmm tempting to put it L-1, but I really dont trust most of the people off the wagon. Sad.
Shiki why is your RVS vote still up?
I dont like that VC in terms of what has been going on in the thread. Everyone so far expect from Luca sees HEM as scum as well as bugs. Bugs being pushed more. This no pun intended bugs me as I feel more confused at Bugs play rather them being scum or town.
Town!bugs here is a very good mislynch especially if I am wrong about HEM. Their only 2 real grievance AI wise is the werid Stagnate wagon theory that they are trying to use on themselves, which even with the idea that it is
That is is 24 hour only days is still farfetch. The focus on George instead of other players also feels werid focus especially if he thought the phase was about to end (trying to policy lynch a lurker)
I need reasons. Reads that are not connected directly to your wagon and are more concrete in logic/tonal points. IE not George afking, not shiki posting being like a scum you lost to in a different game.
I'm going to hijack Madokas question and also ask what is your general feel on HEM
@Datisi was having a stream of consciousness that ended up making walking in a circle.
Prod dodging at the moment; be on once company is gone
Pedit @shiki
Ok about the colors? Dont know how my conditions impacting my ability to read font colors on this site impacts the game but sure.
The crusade post was planned before role pm. The target of it, monkey, was somebody I just pulled out of the player list for a RVS.
And yes, I want more pressure on HEM while also trying to gague your two committment to the read. Additionally we are moving towards more serious gameplay. I've been doing it to other people too by asking others their view on HEM for the long game.
Luca, same question I had eariler. What gave you that intial town read on monkey?
In post 315, shiki wrote:pushing into overdrive because the activity level of this game is so low. blitz games shouldn't have less content than other games; the same amount of content should be produced in less time. forcing town to make less informed decisions is not town beneficial behaviour.
in some other social deduction games (resistance, jackbox 6 push the button) players are sent on missions to help determine their alignments. i have a lot of time right now (weekend!) so i am currently accepting any and all quests. of course, a vital part of these quests will be to help me determine the alignment of the quest giver, as well as anyone affected by said quest.
So you want to generate AI content by detailing town from playing mafia to play quest that you, I'm guessing, make? All in part because activity is low?
I cant say much because I wrote gay erotica with the player list to incite fame discussion, but I dont see how that helps.
i don't like how you're trying to pre-empt my slight scum impression on you by making it so that it's "scummy" to vote you. That's a level of OMGUS that makes more sense coming from scum.
i don't like typing, and i'd prefer if i'm not hyperactive this game. but i think i have no choice.
In post 172, humaneatingmonkey wrote:your trying to pre-empt a vote from me by saying i'd be scum if i vote you is AI.
i'm now thinking why you had to make me look threatening and intimidating. it could be that your buddies are Datisi or bugspray, and you don't like how they're getting attention.
did i solve it? if i did, please quote this post on end game.
In post 176, humaneatingmonkey wrote:it's either he's diverting attention from a wagon (bugspray), or defending the person i'm trying to start a wagon on (Datisi)
"Sorry if my questions bother you, but you keep saying things that don't make sense."
Even my language? Your questions have answers now. What's on your mind?
I got some townie vibes from these posts.
I don’t agree with his sr on Hiraki, but I can see where he’s coming from feeling that he’s being setup to look scummy if he votes him. His attempt at solving by linking him to Bugs/Datisi also feels townie as I can see why he might think that.
Not a super strong read by any stretch, but I’m much happier lynching Bugs today. Until I see that flip my reads are going to be skewed a bit.
Hmm, so the paranoia over being step up by Hiraki makes him seem town.
That's actually a decent point. It still feels unnatural to me to keep bringing focus and hedging on hiraki, but I can somewhat see that making sense if HEM was hyper paranoid (though that still doesn't fully explain why he didnt just vote hiraki sooner in that exchange)
I will have to think this over once HEM provides more posts.
In post 316, HoldenGolden wrote:Ok about the colors? Dont know how my conditions impacting my ability to read font colors on this site impacts the game but sure.
it wasn't your inability to read the font color or your stating as much but rather the prolonged and awkward nature of the interactions between you and madoka about them. it didn't feel very natural to me.
In post 317, Datisi wrote:Ok. @shiki Do you think George/bugs interactions are necessarily town!bugs scum!george indicative?
Also, your reads in general?
i think it's much more likely town!bugs scum!george indicative than scum/scum indicative.
town - madoka, datisi, hiraki
null - luca, holden, bugspray
scum - george, monkey
I'm not quite sure I'm following the whole interaction thing. Can you put it together in a post and explain the rational (since you put one of us as town in the same post)?
I'm more interested in seeing the analysis than arguing
In post 339, bugspray wrote:
i feel like im missing a few connections and probably arent' respresenting my ideas on relationships in this game peroperly...
going to make a version 2 with arrows and shit after dinner
I thought the diagrams in my chemistry text book were hard to read.
Also there are 9 players and 8 circles?
Ps: best wishes to your family in the Hospital, especially given everything going on
Bugs is complicated for me to read. They reminds me of a player who I played with ages ago decently (Emps for all you meta hungry savages) IE. Someone who logically was very scummy but from a tonal perspective townie (and this was when he rolled town).
I shall eat some pasta, but I'm going to throw out a hot spicy take that bugs is town. I'll explain a more when I return.
Pedit; speaking of spicy, that's a spicy WoT by the monkey himself.
I will preface this by saying the following: This is a Sherlock post. What's a Sherlock post? It is something I just made up to describe a read that is based on assumptions and deductions, much like how the fictional character the name is based on performs, rather than objective truths and facts. There is logic in this post, yet not necessarily in the normal mafia scum/town behavior analysis. You can think of it as a focus on understanding a player through a psychology lenses.
As an extension, I will go further to say I do not think that anything that Bug's has posted is townie from logic based perspective. All of their posts have either left me confused or did not satisfy my curiosity such as when I asked them to provide more credible logic in regards to their reads. Rather, I think he is town based on observations I see from what they are posting.
If it is not your cup of tea, shut up and read it. You signed up to play a digital game with no real world repercussions. Much like watson, you do not have a damn choice.
Observation 1: Meta-breaker; Bugs is relying on guides and wiki to help his play.
Posts that support this:
Spoiler:
In post 237, bugspray wrote:because i think my wagon being stagnant means theres scum on it and if nots not george or luca then it would have to be you unless im just real stupid
In post 238, bugspray wrote:what the fuck is a stagnant wagon then??
like its been more than 1/3 of the ENTIRE day and my wagon hasn't grown that feels pretty fstagnant to me
Have you ever been in a classroom dozing off when suddenly the teacher calls on you? I have, and the first thing I start doing is spurt out technical terms and nonsense.
In a sense, I can see that coming from bugs. A major cornerstone of their posts have to deal with theories, specific fallacies, and literally citing a guide in response to their views on hiraki. It would be a fair assumption to say that bugs knows this information coming into the game, yet their misapplication of these theories and co at nearly every step of their analysis indicates to me that they are looking at the info for the first time. Hence why none of their posts makes any logical sense at all; much like me trying to explain shit in inorganic chem when I am missing the info from organic. Furthermore, since they are using these guides/wiki information, traditional meta-analysis becomes a game of WIFOM. Are they using these because their scum game is shit? Or are they genuinely trying a new style out? There is simply not a good way to read into it.
Spoiler: side tangent on meta
This is why I have said multiple times I do not care for meta points. Unless there is a clear as day sign of someone being mafia, then it really becomes a WIFOM game imo. Even then, all that player has to do is post more in that situation and boom, he broke his meta. Not to mention the lack of playing during the game with someone drastically changes how you read the meta. What might in retrospect seem a meta defining point is actually incorrect because you don't know all the context of what happen. Of course this starts taking into account how diligent somebody is when it comes to meta analysis, but I doubt the average player reads entire games to get the meta on one or two players.
So what do we have left to think about it? The why. Although it is speculation, I think I have a reason to why this points to them being town rather than scum using these to try and blend in. That reason goes back to how they are applying it in their reads. Despite having the access to such theories, most of Bug's scum reads are not carefully constructed to take advantage of them. Not only are the ones that directly cite the theories are short cut, but that they are also posting insightful read justification such as:
This is bleeding into the second observation I will be talking about, yet from a scum!bugs perspective, throwing these kind of reads out when you are trying to find ways to incorporate established theories into your reasons why someone is "scum". Scum imo care much more about maintaining continuity in their reads, basically wanting to show a clear thought process throughout their analysis as typically those who do 180's get called out by town. As such, considering this focus on technical knowledge, I think scum!bugs would not be throwing out such lazy reads conjugation with trying to utilize that tool.
This is really bleeding into number 2, so:
Observation II: Who Cares, not bugs! Bug is posting without care
posts that support this
Spoiler:
Honestly ALOT of Bug's ISO shows this but let me just indulge you
In post 68, bugspray wrote:luca stands out as townish to me; his tone feels different to that newbie game where i was masons with clidd and he was scum
its just a brainworm meta read
wrt 86
i just really like saying lamist because i pronounce it funny in my brain every time i type it
lamist lamist lamist lamist
In post 209, bugspray wrote:its fuckin weird how georgebailey isnt posting since a long time ago (weird to say that with 24h days...)
with how my wagon became stagnant it makes me think maybe its scumdriven?? but i dont think ur the scum on my wagon bcs you seem to be actively townsolve and get ai posts happen
like do we just lynch the inactive slot??
In post 206, bugspray wrote:good morning i read stuff and now i dont know what to think ahhhh also i have to pee
In post 337, bugspray wrote:ok i reread the stuff and its just sort of adding to my confusion i kind of wanna make a 9 circle venn diagram but i dont think that will help me at all
GULP
*opens GIMP*
In post 272, bugspray wrote:every time I read more posts I question myself even more not going to read and compared postsvbecae I'm in bath tub right now tryna chill and also on phone
In post 249, bugspray wrote:wait what the fuck the deadline is 3 days? i thought it was 24 hours
To keep the college relationship going, when the class basically silent laughs at my answer becuase it is batshit wrong I don't care. Why do I care? Wait class is over? When did that happen?
If you have been keeping up with the thread to this point, then you know that bug's is pretty much scum read by pretty much everybody and has been for quite a bit (well, at least by active players). Yet, I find it important that while the logic in their posts have not improved, they really do not seem concerned or even aware of the thread sentiment. Where those would be struggling to defend themselves by throwing everything against the wall, Bug is currently making a fucking 9 directional Venn Diagram with different color lines. They have posted before hand random shit like "I don't know what to make but I need to piss" to "IDGAF I am in a bubble bath"
This does not scream scum frailing that they are likely to get lynched. This screams townie posting what ever comes to their head. Half the time I think the bug is actually reading a different game because they are so detached from what is going on. It is not even a real attempt at misrepresenting and more a genuine confusion of how the game is functioning and evolving. This harks to actual scum tonal analysis. Bug's is too free with their postings. Yes, scum!bugs could be fine posting whatever, but given their posts and how they are seemingly relying on guides and do not seem experienced, then I am left to assume this is indicative of a town!bugs.
The only real frailing I see was during the whole stagnate wagon on me phase of their ISO, yet this bleeds into my final point.
Observation Triangle: Despite being relaxed to post whatever, they are paranoid
Posts to support:
Spoiler:
The entire stagenet wagon thing. Seriously, just go read it. Plus these
In post 335, bugspray wrote:Oh my God those posts are so long I can't read that shit on my phone in bed ugh
But for some tinfoil reason I feel like there's one scum in
I do not have a way to keep the college chemistry part going.
Yet it does sound like a oxymoron to say someone is freely posting whatever without a care, yet super paranoid at the same time. None the less, this is exactly what is going on. While I think tinfoil does have some merit for scum, the way it comes across from Bug alongside the stagnant wagon thing feels very townie upon rereading. It lacks a particular direction I would assume they would have due to scum!bug's knowing that it is a lie. Afterall, it is easier to make tinfoil sound tinfoily when you know it has not real truth (at least to me it does). They do not really use it to set up a push on a player, rather, it is the only basis at times for what they are doing. Tinfoil its George -> voting George.
Hell take what they posted while I was writing this as another example:
bugspray wrote:i cant tell if george is town or doing a good job of pocketing me and it doesnt feel nice
If you are scum!bug here, why the hell do you cast doubt over the person you are trying to push assuming that george is town? Even if he is scum, why draw additional attention to your scum buddy if you are planning to get lynch? Neither help, and this level of paranoidia is what makes me additionally think Bugs is town here. It conveys as genuine skepticism rather than a fabricated lie (not to mention we clearly can see that bugs is not partically planning from observation II).
Observation Addium: On the matter of a George/bug scum team.
I do not remember who, but someone threw this out there so I wanted to talk about it.
No
God no
No.
If they are scum team together they have played like shit (honest truth, especially if they had day talk) and I have played even shitter (double honest truth). Not only can I make another WoT onto why such a team is not valid, but commonsense should too. I am not saying I am a great player (in fact I consider myself quite subpar in the grand scheme of things), but I refuse to live in a world where the scum team has interacted this way with one another.
and yes, i am dismissing it out of disappointment of reality along with me not thinking bugs is scum.
Conclusion and Ramifications:
Bugs is town.
I do not really feel their play-style makes a lick of sense in general, but through trying to understand how they are approaching the game (the guides, care free attitude yet paranoid), I think they are town. Is this the most concrete thing in the world? No. Yet I stand by it. Perhaps it is my gut telling me I am right. Perhaps I am just fucking correct. Like anyone, I will process new info that they post into this, but I want to move away from bugs.
I do not know how this impacts the rest of my reads. I did not get that fair in the writing of this WoT and is my next focus. I do think by consequence that means someone I townlean earlier could be scum. I find it is going to be partially difficult to analyse the push onto Bugs as I can understand why it happened (and was coming/came around to it too) since the posting strength of them is lacking. I am taking a break to play some Sc2 to refresh before I start looking.
If it is not your cup of tea, shut up and read it. You signed up to play a digital game with no real world repercussions. Much like watson, you do not have a damn choice.
Why Luca out of all people. You have eyes and a brain. Read.
Hikaro the wiki says that town flails more often than scum and that scum is more likely to point it out I'm on phone so I can find the wikie page right now
In post 388, bugspray wrote:also abligatory holden called me he in that post which is p yikes
I tried to make sure each time to use the correct pronouns my bad. I am taking Latin right now which, along with other things, has fucked up my pronoun usage (IE Latin does not have third person pronouns at all and 9/10 times I end up using the masculine 'pronoun' for most sentences)
In post 390, Datisi wrote:also, right now i am seeing the george/bugs team as well, considering george like asked bug a question that bugs doesn't seem to have an intention of answering
Spoiler:
Jk just sleep off the nonsense.
pedit: it is much more then that imo but I digress.
I still stand by my bugs post even with criticism raised by Luca as for example with the paranoid point that I agree it is weak on it's own. But combined with the the other points it paints it still in a townie presepctive.
My issue now is damage control. Despite my read on bugs, I do not envision a situation with bugs bleeding town in any case. The only way I see the thread moving on to those more scummy (ex. HEM were I agree with Datisi points on his latest posts) from them is in their death (assuming no invest. PR).
Out of the other two wagons, I refuse to vote Hiraki. HEM is still my preferred lynch, but I will hammer if needed.
I have studying I need to do since this weekend did not go to plan so I'll be here and there for the next couple of hours
In post 484, Luca Blight wrote:I know you dislike using meta to formulate reads, but when you’re Tr’ing specific things that you feel are Town indicative of that player, then I think you’d agree that meta can play a part in ruling out that reasoning.
In post 662, bugspray wrote:this is just my dumb tinfoil brain before i actually do smart analyis but VOTE: looker kinda feels lowkey lamist in a bad way and also different from the micro noormal where we mislynched thsi player
From a Bugs scum game, showing a similar surface-level paranoia.
So allow me to discuss this example.
This ISO prior to the post is random shit and apperently there was some plank dude pissing people off (plank from Ed edd and eddie I guess)
This post comes in and while I do concede that it does use tinfoil I do see differences in that game versus here. There, all of it is strictly focused to push onto on Looker. He makes this post and then a longer one latter in that game pushing the tinfoil more onto looker.
Comparing that to here, and their paranoia/tinfoil is much more randomly applied. Without even looking I know they have directed it to Datisi/George/and Shiki. It's not more focused at all unlike the game you quoted.
In post 487, Datisi wrote:Holden, I was playing in that game. You're missing the context.
Bugspray replaced in. At the time they replaced in, it was the second half of Day 1, and the town had already collectively agreed to be lynching between bugs's slot and Looker. They didn't exactly have a choice in who to push.
In which case then it's bad to compare it to here.
Bugs being forced to initiate a read for survival upon replacing in is not applicatible to a game where bugs was in during the whole game. It's going to come off as them sounding unnatural regardless if they do 1v1 and thus bugs really only had the tinfoil option that game.
Here, Bugs throughout the whole game has been dropping tinfoil/paranoia posts before a major wagon had formed on them. You can argue that the stagent wagon posts are in viture similar since Bugs thought they only had a few hours to live. Yet that does not explain the randomist in later application of it later by them.
That also shows a bit more why they are town because then it makes sense why they gave up basically after being locked into the 1v1 while here they are still, while not successfully, trying to solve the game.
And I say that as someone who despite not having a high game count, has replaced into a highly scummy slot and while not having to 1v1 per say, had to find ways to bleed town which drove me to frabicate more shit on players.
Even with the context and shit, theres a major difference between that games usage and this games usage of it.
In post 490, Luca Blight wrote:Regardless of context, it shows that Bugs knows to manipulate ‘Town paranoia’ as scum.
I don’t know why you think they wouldn’t do it at more ‘random’ times or why that makes it more likely to be genuine.
Whether under pressure or not scum have to manufacture content, and that’s one method of doing it that is easy, safe and appears townie.
It feels like you’re setting a ridiculously low bar in your expectation of Scum!Bugs.
Yet you are also forgetting scum also has to push mislynches.
You can spout all the tinfoil batshit crazy things as scum to look town, yet if that is not paying off either by town pushing the player you foiling for you or your partner trying to help town focus on a mislynch.
Bugs here is not doing that because every two minutes it's a new idea and new person. There is no plan approached that makes it sound fake to me as if theh were trying to set up something.
Also no, it does not necessarily show that bugs knows how to manipulate it as it could easily be that bugs couldn't formulate an actual read on looker there and if they they had to comment, went with the tinfoil option to actually throw something out. That usage is survival, yet you are raising the point that the tinfoil I that game was to seem town when it's simply not. It was forced by the situation of the game.
I dont understand why you cite a game for meta, then turn around and tell me the context of that game is NOT important. Now I'm questioning if you are actually believing in the point or rather pushing onto me for my town case.
In post 487, Datisi wrote:Holden, I was playing in that game. You're missing the context.
Bugspray replaced in. At the time they replaced in, it was the second half of Day 1, and the town had already collectively agreed to be lynching between bugs's slot and Looker. They didn't exactly have a choice in who to push.
In which case then it's bad to compare it to here.
Bugs being forced to initiate a read for survival upon replacing in is not applicatible to a game where bugs was in during the whole game. It's going to come off as them sounding unnatural regardless if they do 1v1 and thus bugs really only had the tinfoil option that game.
Here, Bugs throughout the whole game has been dropping tinfoil/paranoia posts before a major wagon had formed on them. You can argue that the stagent wagon posts are in viture similar since Bugs thought they only had a few hours to live. Yet that does not explain the randomist in later application of it later by them.
That also shows a bit more why they are town because then it makes sense why they gave up basically after being locked into the 1v1 while here they are still, while not successfully, trying to solve the game.
did you like... uhh.... read? their case on Hiraki? tell me that shit is not fabricated to let them survive.
you mean the fact that it's "randomist" makes them town here? the point was that the tinfoil paranoia stuff makes no sense. no matter at how many people it's aimed at.
trying to solve the game. where? they're locked into their hiraki read because of BaD vIbEs from what page 5? they keep repeating about a stagnant/scum motivated wagon while it's obvious that they don't know the application of those words?
pedit: oh hi.
And did you not read the ridcious amounts of other shit that came before it on different players. Hence why in the last paragraph I said that they are not successfully solving the game.
Regardless, the meta point brought up does not apply here given that games circumstances, and if it did, still shows more town!bugs then scum! Bugs. If I need to explain that more then you are lost playing 3d chess while I'm playing a fun game like soccer
In post 497, Datisi wrote:you mean trying to push shiki for reasons i genuinley don't even understand or remember, or pushing george because of not posting? how is any of that town?
ok holden. ok.
I've said that I think logicay they are still scum. My towncase isn't built upon that like I clearly stated.
My is removed from those notions and are built differently. I dont see neither a scum motivation for random shallow pushes with little obvious support assuming sxum!bugs teammate is trying to help them
In post 498, HoldenGolden wrote:I've said that I think logicay they are still scum. My towncase isn't built upon that like I clearly stated.
My is removed from those notions and are built differently. I dont see neither a scum motivation for random shallow pushes with little obvious support assuming sxum!bugs teammate is trying to help them
where did you say that?
how tf is a hiraki push a "push with little obvious support"? Ok, do you see town motivation for random shallow pushes? Scum motivation would easily be crating content, because scum has to create it.
The very beginning of the post? Before the observations? Where I say "I dont think traditionally there are any posts that make them town" or something to that affect?
I didn't say it was town motivation directly. I'm saying it is a stupid god damn plan to go around as scum spitting out shitty posts on so many players thus revealing bad analysis throughout since scum also wants to survive. Then to keep throwing in new names once pressure rises on you further makes no sense as scum.
If I have to simpfiy what I view bugs as, it is anti town. Someone who is not showing privilege town behavior despite being town. Hence why I said what I said about damage control and hammering.
As an extension, I will go further to say I do not think that anything that Bug's has posted is townie from logic based perspective.
All of their posts have either left me confused or did not satisfy my curiosity such as when I asked them to provide more credible logic in regards to their reads.
Rather, I think he is town based on observations I see from what they are posting.
you mean this?
ah ok i think i see what you mean.
ye, i guess we'll have to agree to disagree. it doesn't make "sense" as scum to do that. but if you're assuming that scum is always doing optimal/stellar plays is gonna lose you some town games. i've seen scum win games that they had virtually no chance of winning because scum did things that were blatantly shooting themself in the foot fpr the town to go "why would they do that if they're scum??? must be town." and those were intentional plays. players sometimes make bad moves regardless.
I know, but I think with other points I raised it's more likely to come from town but its w/e. It is agree to disagree. I dont see it ever changing much given bugs posts after my WoT.
In any case, bugs must die before we are/if placed into a mylo or lylo situation due to the ambiguity of the slot much like antitown players in general. Could easily be wrong and they are scum which cool.
Annoying but I dont really see an alternative.
-------
As a side note since you are on the other side of the fence, how did you interrupt Lucas last post there? I still bugs me that he raises the meta point just to dismiss the context of it, but I admit I may be bias in reading it given my views on bugs
In post 524, humaneatingmonkey wrote:if bugs flip scum
Hiraki - town
Datisi - town
Madoka - ?
shiki - ?
GeorgeBailey - ?
Luca Blight - town
HoldenGolden - ?
if bugs flip town
Hiraki - scum
Datisi - scum
Madoka - town
shiki - ?
GeorgeBailey - ?
Luca Blight - ?
HoldenGolden - town
if bugs flip scum, i'm pretty much wrong this entire game.
What is this based on in general?
I see your overall reads here bleeding into it, but is this based on how players have treated bugs, why am I town if bugs is town but Hiraki who shares my thoughts on them is scum?
In post 535, bugspray wrote:i'm town neighbor with datisi but he was acting weird and pockety early on on the hood and then when i started indicating that i probably was trusting him too much we stopped posting
hem and holden PLEASE stop fucking using the wrong pronoun
I'm pretty sure most of the time when I was talking about you it was with the proper pronouns but I apologize.