Mini 2133: XP Mafia II (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
In post 5, Professor Moriarty wrote:Day 1 begins!
Today, you must vote to put one of the following Public Mechanics into play:
This mechanic will remain in play for the whole game.
Vote for a mechanic using VOTE: Mechanic. The mechanic with most votes (plurality) will be put into play at the end of the day.
Neigjborizer is effective for certain types of players. Not all.Professor Moriarty wrote:In post 14, Hectic wrote:@mod: Will any of these Public Mechanics show up on Day 2 as options, or are we not aware of that fact?Not public information.
Training Cop is an excellent option for town to strategize. This prevents lying on what actions people take. If the player list all train cops a different person, we can chastisize the scumteam's abilities if we all train and give result-context to any night kill. Town gains more XP than Scum in this manner.
Disable Strongman is tempting, but with the opportunity of upgrades in the game, any player not-training N1 may be suboptimal. If choices bleed over to the next phase in any form, I like this idea later.
VOTE: Train Cop
I'd prefer that we are open about who we would cop to best utilize this option.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
In post 32, Hectic wrote:
We can't Train and Train Cop simultaneously I don't think.In post 30, Lady Chloe wrote:Training Cop is an excellent option for town to strategize. This prevents lying on what actions people take. If the player list all train cops a different person, we can chastisize the scumteam's abilities if we all train and give result-context to any night kill. Town gains more XP than Scum in this manner.MOD
Please clarify.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
I need to work on my reading comprehension skills.
5 players create a public pool of 5 people who they cop in, but don't out who they cop.In post 31, Hectic wrote:
Lul, you know I'm in.In post 29, Pink Ball wrote:
My kind of player.In post 28, Ginngie wrote:
as in, it's my favorite analysis no one trusts or does and I just want to have funIn post 27, Ginngie wrote:mastina is in the game so lets let mafia kill who they please
Night Kill analysis in this playerlist is viable
what's wrong with having fun
Hectic we're building a fun bloc, wanna join?
Btw, random thought, but what if we select Train Cop, and then have everyone in the playerlist eitherTrain, orTrain Cop Checkthe person who's next in the list. That way, the scum who did the kill has a chance to be caught out, since they can't claim they were Training, since there's a 50% chance of the person behind them checking them. And they'll have to claim whether the person in front of them was Training or not. Actually, I just realised this has problems since scum could be next to each other, and order of claims matters a lot. Never mind. (Unless someone smarter than me can see another way).
1 of the 5 cops must create pool of 6 because:
Everybody in the playerlist must have their names in exactly 2 pools. 13×2=26
The other 8 train.
This makes scum's predictability of who checks them harder even if scum exists in the cops.
This confirms more town will get XP than scum.
This confirms town exists within the cops.
This is the best I can come up with.
Whether we have a defined strategy over this tool, protections have a 1/13 chance of blocking a strongman kill. It's low utility here.
I like to think of Quest PTs to have a similar utility to neighborhoods, so I'm not convinced of the use here.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
I overlooked the underlined detail. I will refrain from reading walls on the phone.
VOTE: Disable Strongman
This is, and will always be the optimal option.
Yes, relatively well. I /in'd because I enjoy the mod and several players in/out of mafia.
No, I do not plan to out my main.
No, meta is not strictly the best method to read me. This alt is a playstyle experiment.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
What do you expect from this?In post 72, mastina wrote:
Well let me tell you, if you're town it's a failure already. (I guess you could argue it's also a failure as scum if I pegged you this early, buthey, never know.)In post 70, Lady Chloe wrote:This alt is a playstyle experiment.
Because I'm pretty sure this is not the result you intended from your alt:
HURT: Lady Chloe.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Pine,
I disagree with that being a reason to vote change so quickly.
The idea that disabling scum's ability of a strongman does imply the possibility of such a role to exist, and since I realized that mechanics last throughout the game, Disabling Strongman is always the best decision.
Protection roles will never be reliable without this.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
The principle still applies. I will not be a record tape.In post 91, Lady Chloe wrote:Protection roles will never be reliable without this. (Disable Strongman Ability)- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Hectic,
There is no confirmation we can vote Disabling Strongman again:
Why is Train Cop the better approach?In post 21, Professor Moriarty wrote:In post 14, Hectic wrote:@mod: Will any of these Public Mechanics show up on Day 2 as options, or are we not aware of that fact?Not public information.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
I asked why Train Cop was the better approach, not permission on why it's OK to the drop the Disable Strongman vote.In post 120, Hectic wrote:Lady Chloe, I'm assuming the setup is balanced in such a way that not choosing Disable Strongman won't be that bad for one of the following reasons:
1 - There's not that many protectives in the game/stuff relevant to strongmen.
2 - The option will be available again on a future day.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
This approach assumes that town is always correctly permitting town into a quest. Scum have the power of voice, too.In post 124, Ame wrote:I think only the minimum number of players necessary should do the quest and we should vote on which players to do the quest during the day. This will, ideally, reduce mafia's influence inside the quest and potentially limit their access to the content discussed.
This approach also assumes that mafia willcareabout this decision-making process, even in the threat of capture or vig.
To more thoroughly reduce scum's chances of success in a quest; at least 2x town should be present in a quest in respect of the current living mafia.
3 alive mafia.In post 1, Professor Moriarty wrote:16. This game is 10 town-aligned players versus 3 mafia-aligned players.
6 townies must join.
9 players is the minimum I'll accept for a well-functioning, town-led Quest.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Ame,
I read:
I see your point. I like this idea best, thus far. Say no more.Ame wrote:That's what I mean by a filter. It's not perfect, but it's something. If scum care about influencing the quest, they will have to do so first in the public thread, then in the private thread. It's just an idea though. I don't think it's that important if there's not obvious support for it. To be honest, my real agenda was giving critical PRs a way to avoid joining the quest without becoming a target for mafia. But increasing the number who join beyond the minimum kind of diminishes that.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
momo,
I see a disparity in springlullaby's attitude towards you and Hectic.
Spoiler: springlullaby posting
-She captures you, with little context but a poor Neighborizer choice.
-The context of her vote is given with the next post in this series; you implied a Strongman role.
-Farkset clarifies to her (and I) that Strongman is an ability listed by the mod in the first posts.Invalidating her supposed reason to capture you.
-Still, she reasserts her scumread on you - with the context that it had been there since the first post - but captures Hectic.For different reasons.
-Upon your reaction, she deems that both of you are potential buddies.
I want to know whether you believe springlullaby's push against you is different in nature to her push against Hectic, or not.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Apologies for the long-winded post, but I must interact with several posts in succession for transparency and sorting-sake:
I misunderstood the mechanics, and paved an otherwise different strategy.In post 284, springlullaby wrote:^
Yes.
You say you misunderstood the mechanics.
I said you were wrong. Aka gearing the town toward bad choices for bad reasons.
Big difference.
You misunderstood the mechanics, and changed my perspective of how we should approach.
Ame was openly flexible about her perspective.
Mastina has been accused of "attempting a townslip."
Not Known 15 and Pine have changed votes, albeit for differing reasons under other contexts.
How do these situations yield different conclusions on our alignments - or, if not - how you approach us?
I believe you fail to differentiate mechanical choice and alignment. While a sound point on this approach exists, it is lazy.In post 286, springlullaby wrote:... what?
Your neighborizer choice was poor as well as the reason you displayed in justifying it.
Mastina and Lady Chloe did not such thing.
Are you saying that Mastina and Chloe are town, scum?
Furthermore:
-You deem Momo/Hectic are scum.
-You differentiate that Mastina and I are different than Hectic in action, but not in alignment.
-You accuse Hectic as scum in the same sentence of inquiring whether he believes Mastina and I are town.
If Hectic said any read other than null - what would you have concluded?
You point the finger to many people, is that to overshadow the fingers pointed at you?In post 293, springlullaby wrote:Actually Hectic and Farkset can be scum together again.
If you want a Leader position, you might want to stop forcing your will onto others.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
You may guess to humor me or others, but I do not guarantee any validation to your theories.In post 289, Hectic wrote:They're both pretty close to null. But I like Lady Chloe better based on her recent posts and 282.
Side note: I'm pretty sure I know who you are, Lady Chloe
-
Lighter note, I like FotC's recent posting off first-glance.
UNVOTE:
I will assess critically later.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Farkset,
To clarify, I do suspect springlullaby as potential scum. However, the bolded statement was to give her the benefit of the doubt, so I may evaluate how she viewed the statement for a more accurate read of her.
springlullaby,
I will respond to you in full later. To further explain myself, I am not committing to Leader-ing you, nor am I committing to not. It is not a concrete call I make right now, as I'm unsure of whether I'll quest. The list is at 8 people, currently. Even then, my reservations of Questing are only slightly reduced by most or all the players joining.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
You have a lovely brain, Ame.
My main fear is we will not have the same option with Disable Strongman, again. A crucial town PR getting sabotaged in the Quest, another.
Leaving the possibility of the two outcomes above makes it hard to Quest and vote Neighborizer in good conscience.
Say, the two above outcomes occur, how may town best approach the game?- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
springlullaby,
I'm uncomfortable attaching the word "balance" to a game with thread and role mechanics that I'm both unfamiliar with and don't have a grand reference of sorting out.
Mafia could have Roleblock, but the principle of allowing Mafia an additional mechanical chance is counterproductive. I agree that town having a likelier chance of acquiring the item is a protown reason to Quest. I believe you have an optimistic viewpoint of this game, so it occurs to me that you may be quite genuine and reassures me of your motivation.
In any case, I have Quested.
I am remaining firmly on Disable Strongman.
My next posts will revolve around Capture/Not Capture and a readslist.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Apologies for the confusion, the unvote was on FotC.In post 428, Ame wrote:VOTE: Disable Strongman
Spoiler: Vote Count
I'm not sure whether or not Lady Chloe's unvote counts toward the capture or the mechanic.
@modwhat should we use to unvote?
I clarify this now as I skim, since I am quite busy today.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
I am both busy and in mental distress regarding forum mafia as of this moment.
Be kind, and approach me with questions and assessments.
I will say, upon skimming the recent squabbles, 551 is one of the most blessed posts this game. Ame is a darling.
Also, I fear that many people speak of my alignment in association to others, without utilizing a direct approach to me.
That makes filtering the messages to decide who is town much more difficult.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Lynch will become available later in this setup? I was wondering how the game would progress flip-wise, then.In post 651, Flight of the Conchords wrote:So, you pushed someone to L-1 and they claimed a power role to avoid being captured.
Just like I said would happen.
Have you realized it's a bad idea yet, or are you all still being dense?
This day needs to end, and it should end without without using the capture.
We wait until lynch becomes available.
- Bret
I no longer see any value in the Capture utility, especially with this idea.
It is a form to force claims and degrade viable town strategy.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
I will say, before I convene with Pink Ball and Hectic, I want something answered.
Farkset,
In post 681, Farkset wrote:Kerset has no patience and doesn't read discord
Still interested in chloe's comments
-Farkran
Why can't you handle any input that you don't agree with to exist in the thread?In post 699, Farkset wrote:Well i was going to wait for lady chloe but this is taking a turn for the worse so i feel i need to step in now.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Hectic,
Hydra. They have more eyes for different ways of seeing, and lips to make it harder to speak any lies.In post 674, Hectic wrote:As you wish, Lady Chloe.
You are on the RMS Moriarty. The course is set forXP Island. However, a tragedy has occurred. Captainthe worstwas killed in a freak accident whileVending Fruitto aParanoid Gun Owner. The PGO fled the scene before anyone got a good look at them.
A short time later: springlullaby was found singing poems about Farkset nearby, while Ame was practising her demonic faces. You have a [Hydra, and Portable Ram] at your disposal.
No. You best be more direct, or find another theory.In post 677, Hectic wrote:For the record, Lady Chloe, my guess for your alt:
You used to train at that administration and then formed a team with those other 3. Ring a bell?
I may add that even if a town PR claim does not occur in the face of capture, it may be for an important reason as to avoid a nightkill.In post 688, Hectic wrote:Pros of Capturing:- Can examine wagons/votes for later.
- Capturing scum blocks their ability.
Cons of Capturing:- Potential to block town PRs, or force them to claim.
- Wagon information is less useful as it's not that harmful for scum to bus.
- No information from a flip.
Unless the thread has a consensus scumread, capturing is - for lack of a more quaint term - "opening a can of worms."
I am not entirely against the idea of capture, but there are many pushes, and little clarity.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Pink Ball,
Say that capturing is always net positive for town here, where do you believe the votes should be going?In post 679, Pink Ball wrote:I think that not capturing has the same vibe that not lynching has. Would you no lynch on D1 because we don't have enough info? No, because the lynch per se is what gives the most info about players.
We capture someone, and then combined with later flips we get better and stronger cases on players' intentions. Not capturing is saving your money under your mattress. Guess what, you're losing money.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Farkran,
In post 699, Farkset wrote:Well i was going to wait for lady chloe but this is taking a turn for the worse so i feel i need to step in now.
1) Capturing doesn't force anyone to claim. You are not removed from the game if you don't, you just lose 1 xp, up to 2 considering that you cannot train if you wanted to. Spring claimed on her own, and that was a terrible claim both in timing and nature. Voyeur is an uncommon enough role to assume no counterclaim would happen, and a weak enough role to validate surviving n1.
2) I find it very unlikely that a town PR only costs 1 xp to upgrade, even if it is a bad role. She said she misread, but then she never claimed the correct amount. After claiming role and xp, there was nothing to prevent her from telling the whole truth.
3) Spring votes end day in 664 after calling multiple people scum with great conviction. Inconsistent and survivalistic, and the timing of the vote sounds like sheeping chloe. This is reason A for believing spring is being either defended by scum or TMIed town, but scum is more likely
4) Post 651 is incredibly lamisty and assumes people have forced spring into a claim. It is not true. This is reason B.
I can compromise capturing conchord or chloe if not spring. I'm not voting day end to avoid wagonomics.
-Farkran
I am not convinced by your latter post. You've already begun to say that you'd compromise on capturing me and two other players, instead of truly evaluating why I hold the opinions I do.In post 737, Farkset wrote:Chloe, i scumlean you - i have no issues with you as a person. I feel the need to correct wrong opinions and providing my own, but i don't want you to stop talking.
As you can see, i'm not immune to mistakes though.
-Farkran
Your thirst for asserting your opinion over others while deeming not doing so - being the more scum-indicative approach - may come from a town mindset, if not scum who tries to control the narrative.
I added my reasons to Hectic's list for why no capture has a benefit.
Can you enlighten me on how you read Hectic and Springlullaby's interactions?- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
springlullaby,
I agree with your sentiment, but I wonder why you desire to dominate the thread with your presence.In post 745, springlullaby wrote:MORATORIUM ON ALL CLAIM AND ROLE TALK
SCUM DO NOT NEED TO KNOW MORE
DO NOT ENGAGE WHEN PEOPLE ARE FISHING- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
springlullaby and Farkset,
May you both kindlyquiet down?
It is hard enough to filter this game with 2/3 top three posters argue and bicker for pages on end, but for you both to assume I and other players pick sides is a scum-motivation or scum-favored tactic on both of you.
I'm speaking to you, Farkran, who deem Ame and I as potential associatives to potential springlullably-scum without even consulting our opinions of her, which is an easy excuse for you.
I'm speaking to you, springlullaby, because your voting is inconsistent and it's difficult to navigate where you want this day to go, you calling for my opinion is dismissive of what I try to tell you.
If you both believe the other is scum, then drop the conversation, and negotiate with other players.
This goes nowhere.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
My, how informative these posts were after my 848
Spoiler: Conversation
springlullaby shows a willingness to indulge in my thoughts, while providing an option alternate to my vote on ending the day.
Farkran waits to reply to another person, outlining that I am independently a scumlean despite his previous reasons of suspecting me to be associative, and inquires to another player if they believe I have faked being the mediator.
While both may come from either alignment given a player's skill, I enjoy springlullaby's best given the necessity for town to reach a consensus on the game. One is an example of good faith solving, and the other being less so.
This was the hands-on sorting that I needed to read them better.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Blessed Ones,
This is the underlying point on why I haven't voted to capture springlullaby.In post 862, Pink Ball wrote:And even if spring was scum which is unlikely, roleblocking a claimed voyeur is not ideal
As well as point on my hesitance to capture. Some PRs may mechanically need as many XP-gain opportunities as available to effectively serve town.
Capture is not a lynch, but some town players may feel the reward of using their powers to it's highest potential to outweigh the risk of claiming.
This is my final point on the ability of no capture. I accept rebuttals.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Ame,
I originally suspected her, mafia with either Hectic or momo for what I pointed out in 282.
I continually felt conflicted with her, since her insistence on deeming others as scum so loudly may be to block out the belying noise of scum itself.
Yet, I've grown to unsubscribe from the reasons other suspect her. I townlean her, she wears no veil to hide, and she asserts her views confidently with an option to compromise that doesn't alter her viewpoints. I think if she were mafia, she has placed herself in a disadvantageous and risky position. I have little desire to reconsider now.
848 was to survey her in a different manner than I did before, and I drew greater solidity in the read for doing so.
In a game where scum have incentive to doubt others at any possible angle, Raya focusing on forging townreads is a grand strategy... and a town one.In post 882, Ame wrote:(2) What are your thoughts on Raya? In particular, I'm curious what you think about her read on you and on Pine as presented in 854.
For 854, she reads me correctly.
The nuance she followed up with in 874 for Pine and I, are hard to falsify with a scum mindset. She had ample opportunity to subtly shift the narrative against either two of us, as well as springlullaby and Ginngie, but did not.
He has not followed-up, to my belief.In post 882, Ame wrote:(3) I don't think momo ever responded to your 282 or did he? If not, how come you haven't followed up on it? If so, what did you get (or intend to) get out of it?
I have no reason to follow-up until he has. I still suspect him.
I want his reply to that post - however irrelevant it may be now - to see how he rationalizes Hectic's and springlullaby's reads and approach. He voiced confidence in his capture vote, and I wanted to see if his rationale aligned with such.
You mean, I remove myself from the Quest?In post 882, Ame wrote:(4) My spidey senses are going off about the quest. Please join me? I don't have a logical reason or anything, it's just intuition.
You voice a fear I've contained for days now. But I must have your confirmation, if we are both to Not Quest.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Farkran,
Your stance bewilders me.In post 904, Farkset wrote:I replied to Raya because it was Raya pointing out that your 848 was town, while i think you could be able to fake it. It's not part of why i scumlean you, it's an opinion on whether or not that post was indicative of being town, so i asked Raya if he found your post tonally similar to Pine's. I think it isn't but that doesn't make you scum.
What's in good faith from springlullaby?
-Farkran
You have yet to voice why I am independently scum for springlullaby, yet you've spoke of this read originally as if it had all to do with my connection to springlullaby.
Someone you could believe is town stated that I were town, but you think the reason to townread me on such is misled. But it is not part of your scumlean on me? Nor is it scum-indicative on my part?
How you view me is non-committal, Farkran.
As for springlullaby, I believe she takes to me in good faith since her reads are committed stances and this is consistent with her approach to the game.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
There is one fear I have with you, Farkran, and it is that I am reading you too literally.
If you are not getting the results you desire from this thread as we speak, then it may be a point of reassessment. I don't mean your read on me.
p-edit
I am having trouble concluding who you speak about in the first paragraph, and how you connect the quoted posts to your assessment.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
Farkran,
You do not specify how the post impacts your read on me. Your focus seemed more on another's input. Let me know if I overlooked a follow-up that engaged your opinion beyond "she could be faking this."In post 911, Farkset wrote:
Answering to the bolded, since it is the main point of your objection:In post 906, Lady Chloe wrote:Farkran,
Your stance bewilders me.In post 904, Farkset wrote:I replied to Raya because it was Raya pointing out that your 848 was town, while i think you could be able to fake it. It's not part of why i scumlean you, it's an opinion on whether or not that post was indicative of being town, so i asked Raya if he found your post tonally similar to Pine's. I think it isn't but that doesn't make you scum.
What's in good faith from springlullaby?
-Farkran
You have yet to voice why I am independently scum for springlullaby, yet you've spoke of this read originally as if it had all to do with my connection to springlullaby.
Someone you could believe is town stated that I were town, but you think the reason to townread me on such is misled. But it is not part of your scumlean on me? Nor is it scum-indicative on my part?
How you view me is non-committal, Farkran.
As for springlullaby, I believe she takes to me in good faith since her reads are committed stances and this is consistent with her approach to the game.
No, that specific post does not make you scum. But it also doesn't make you town - in my opinion. I asked Raya what was the difference between your post and Pine's.
Why would you think that post in particular would make anyone read you as town, or scum?
Not at all did I imply that you find scumminess in all your posts.In post 911, Farkset wrote:This is an interesting question tbh, i'd like to hear why you would think that i should scumread you based on that. Why would a player who scumleans you find scumminess in every single one of your posts?
-Farkran
I am trying to understand your perspective, and you are failing me in helping me see.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
My, I misspoke. I dislike Quote conversations.
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
None of this was ever personal, Farkran. I don't know where you gathered this impression.
Yes, scum may fake 848, but my post in 901 veiled a solving utility, and you entertained the reality of me being scum more than one where I was sorting; but you did not commit to a viewpoint. That's my grievance with your approach to this slot.
My speech to Ame is related to my agreement with her. I had no prediction or expectation on how she would reply because I was not concerned with it.
Supposing by your final point that your post was directed more to understanding Raya, I will hold my tongue. Perhaps I misread you here.
I must eat breakfast now, I have more to think on.- Lady Chloe
-
Lady Chloe Goon
- Lady Chloe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 506
- Joined: March 31, 2020
For transparency, 916 was my attempt at humor. 914 and 915 were unintentional double posts. - Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe
- Lady Chloe