You call that a wallpost?
In post 417, Iconeum wrote: In post 406, Alduskkel wrote:Well, first it seemed like Kanna and I were about equally scummy to Icon (circa pages 13 and 14 or so). Then Icon said "if I get lynched here lynch kanna next" (page 15) which implies Kanna is scummier than me. This is also seen in the reads list later on that page where Kanna is "prob scum" but I'm just "could be scum." Icon then goes on to vote me and says 1 of me and Kanna is scum but probably not both. So why did Icon feel confident enough to say "if I get lynched here lynch kanna next"? That could potentially lead to two town lynches in a row from town-Icon's perspective. If Icon really thinks that one of Kanna and I are scum, then it should be trying to sort which one is the scum, which I don't think is happening. I also don't think it made sense to call Kanna scummier but then switch votes to me -- maybe scum Icon saw me as the easier target?
i think this entire paragraph can be cut down to:
ico voted aldus despite having a slightly larger or more expressed scumread in kanna therefore this is ico!scum
which is identical to:
Aside from being an oversimplification, you're omitting the fact that your level of confidence was unjustified when from a town perspective you should have more to investigate to avoid mislynches.
In post 429, OkaPoka wrote: In post 384, Alduskkel wrote: In post 370, OkaPoka wrote:ald is doing the scummy thing where he sheeps kanna to 1v1 ico but tries to get ico to 1v1 kanna
i think
either ald/kanna is svs taking turns or ald/kanna is svt where he's burning two slots kinda
could you explain?
also i missed this but
it means that i think there are two worlds that make equal sense
one where its you/kanna and you are tag teaming ico and well, ico probably wont win the tag team with outside assistance
or its you using kanna to create a false 1v1 to incriminate both
something like that, tinfoil hats are fun
I see where you're coming from, but if that were my plan then I'm doing a very bad job of it. If Kanna and I are scum together then why do we need to tag-team Icon when we could have just maintain the status quo and hope the game moves toward a DP or QQ lynch? Alternatively, if I'm scum and Icon v Kanna is TvT, then why do I poke my head in and attract attention when a 1v1 between them would probably have developed naturally?
In post 430, Euphony wrote:Don't like
349 as a way to justify his L-1 - part of the reason the game was slow was because Aldu was pretty inactive. I agree with Datisi regarding the consistency thing on Ico. Spotting that Drew-Sta thing in
416 pretty towny though.
Why is
364towny, Aldu?
Happy with DoctarPepper/Alduskkel wagons I think.
----> Hectic
To the first part -- it's kind of a positive feedback cycle. The game is slow which means I have less to say because I'm having trouble reading people, and the game is slower because I'm not saying much. I wanted to try to break out of that cycle.
Why is
364 townie? It's hard to explain, but I don't see scum going, "ugh, what you did was townie but I don't like it." Especially when it's about AtE where it's easy to say you scumread someone for it. To me it read as town-Oka saying, "that was bad behavior but my town win condition means I'm forced to acknowledge that you're more likely to be town because of it."
In post 445, OkaPoka wrote:so i spent some time trying to type something witty but i cant so
you do you shiki
In post 446, Drew-Sta wrote:And I thought we were out of RVS and Eup tries to drag us right back in...
I hope you guys have figured out by now that
post 442 was a joke post by Hectic pretending to be shiki.
In post 477, Datisi wrote:ico the fact is i've played a lot of games with him and he seems Just Town? he's got a Townblocc(tm) and is going through PoE and his reads make sense to me, and there's just enough "wtf is this shit ico" posts that i don't think he'd be faking so
Icon can have a townblock as scum, and has before. The second reason is fair from your perspective. For the third reason, what posts specifically made you think that?
In post 485, Kanna wrote:Just replying to past stuff don't mind me
Can you elaborate on Alduskkel? 349 comes off as kind of a joke to me actually
349 wasn't a joke.
In post 520, Drew-Sta wrote: In post 406, Alduskkel wrote:Well, first it seemed like Kanna and I were about equally scummy to Icon (circa pages 13 and 14 or so). Then Icon said "if I get lynched here lynch kanna next" (page 15) which implies Kanna is scummier than me. This is also seen in the reads list later on that page where Kanna is "prob scum" but I'm just "could be scum." Icon then goes on to vote me and says 1 of me and Kanna is scum but probably not both. So why did Icon feel confident enough to say "if I get lynched here lynch kanna next"? That could potentially lead to two town lynches in a row from town-Icon's perspective. If Icon really thinks that one of Kanna and I are scum, then it should be trying to sort which one is the scum, which I don't think is happening. I also don't think it made sense to call Kanna scummier but then switch votes to me -- maybe scum Icon saw me as the easier target?
The fact you keep citing Ico as scum without forming a really good argument is curious. And no, the above is not a good argument. It's basically OMGUS reasoning. Which is a poor foundation to work with. If you think Icon is scum, form an argument on why utilising posts and the like.
How did you get OMGUS from what I said? What's wrong with my argument?
Drew-Sta wrote:Why exactly is Icon scummy.
Already said why.
In post 556, Drew-Sta wrote:
The meta I'm not worried about. The adoption by Aldus of Kanna's argument is of concern.
345,
351,
366 are a weird falling in line with Kanna. If an Icon lynch went ahead, then Aldus could bus Kanna for leading the argument for the lynch and absolve himself of responsibility.
410 is misrep, as it wasn't Aldo scum reading, it was Aldo following Kanna's read after you pressed them.
414 is then a cop out: 'Oh no! I wasn't actually voting Ico, I was just being a muppet!' Which is covering himself and cutting himself off from calling Ico into suspicion. Then backs onto Ico being scum in
416 again, buddies Oka and suggests I'm PR fishing (which is casting shade) on my post - which completely misreps what I said.
When you say "weird" do you mean scummy? If so, what's scummy about it? And the problem with your next statement is that it assumes Icon and Kanna are town.
I don't know what you mean about post 410.
For context for post 414, I didn't have a strong read on Icon at the time I placed the vote, though it was still a scumread. I'm not "backing onto Ico being scum" -- I'm saying my scumread has grown stronger since I placed the vote.
Saying I townread Oka isn't buddying.
I didn't cast shade on your post -- in fact, I said I thought you were town because of it.
In post 568, QuantumQuasar wrote:UNVOTE: DoctorPepper
as I said you might be a townie thanks for your time
VOTE: Alduskkel
Kanna move your vote to Alduskkel
stick together team with OkaPoka
Iconeum voting Kanna doesn't help his case
Euphony has camo presume, vote alduskkel
Could you contribute to the discussion more than this? What specifically do you find scummy about me?