Mini Normal 2143 (Game over)
Forum rules
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
Votes to bandwagon at start.
Not L-2. Excuse to try and get lynch. Possibly trying to angle for fire to claim without knowing the votes.
omgus vote. After he correctly pointed out it was not l-2/
vote: Mohab500
blurry has not posted.
PAGE TWO COMPROMISE LYNCH? WTF?In post 25, Mohab500 wrote:That's such a weird way of looking at it: I am proposing we lynch him in case we have no other reads, I'd rather mislynch a Jester than deal with a headache claiming to be a Jester the entire game, especially if we have no better leads. But I am not adverse to lynching someone else if we have to, I guess.
crazy vote switching so early.In post 47, Mohab500 wrote:I actually didn't know that at first, but I still want to lynch you on principle. VOTE: Quick
DUDE, IT IS A NORMAL GAME. WE SIGNED UP BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT A BASTARD SET-UP. This must be trolling. Scummy as hell imho.In post 56, Mohab500 wrote:Don't trust in the rules, or the moderator, or the other players. Trust in yourself, because that's all that matters. Just because the rules say a Jester can't be in the game, doesn't mean a Jester isn't in the game. The meaning of reality can quickly change based on your own perceptions of right and wrong.
----- Need to stop tving mohab. -----
Why are you talking about twon reads on page 3. Defending people like this is scummy, and at the very least anti-town. There is no reason to defend someone this early. Only in late game does it make sense for town to waste energy defending each other.In post 60, Sakura Hana wrote:Hey Mohab im town leaning you too what are you going to do about that huh?!
Great point. Either he thinks it is real, or he doesn't. If he thinks it isn't real, it shouldn't matter as an obvious joke. If he does think it is true, then he is playing against win-con.In post 63, NorwegianboyEE wrote:-town equity on Mohab for taking advantage of a page 1 joke jester claim and egging a lynch on Quick. (They thought the claim was actually serious.)
THIS IS DIRECTLY PLAYING AGAINST A TOWN WIN-CON. Very suspicous to want to lynch a jester claim day one. More likely scenario is scum trying to justify a strange random list.In post 80, Sakura Hana wrote: So ergo, if there's a Jester claim the correct action is to lynch them and let them win, however not skip the day.
Agreement.In post 84, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Lynching negative utility is low-hanging fruit in my opinion
Either way, voting to lynch the jester claim d1 is saying that you want to lose the game. The counterfactual of scum cliaming jester for the lulz does not make sense. Why would they want to draw negative attention to them. If you actually believe int he jester claim, you are playing against your win-con.In post 86, Sakura Hana wrote:
Problem with that is that, Jester isnt exactly negative utility it's literally a different win condition, sure they can help town... if they want to, but their win condition encourages them to do things like acting scummy on purpose, spam posting, active lurking or who knows what else to encourage people to lynch them.In post 84, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Lynching negative utility is low-hanging fruit in my opinion
Of course a claimed Jester means a Jester willing to work with the town in exchange for being lynched so they can win, so in the end they have to be lynched too anyway and scum gets a free NK at some point.
So no, they arent town.
In post 96, Sakura Hana wrote:
Normally I'd agree, but there were some people that believed Jester to be able to be included in a Normal and have done behaviour that can be analysed on that context.In post 93, popopopopopopo wrote:not that this shit matters, this is a normalLet's solve this problem right now.@Mod, is a jester a possible role in this game under your interpretation of the definition of a normal game?after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
No justification for vote. And guess what, the scummy guy who wants to lynch jesters follows on in the next post.
Start of page 5.
RIght now I don't like popop, monhab, and sakura.
Thank you for being somewhat rational.In post 113, NorwegianboyEE wrote: Idk, i don't have much experience with jesters. And that's precisely why i don't care to strategize about it. First of all, it doesn't really matter because why would a normal game have a jester? Secondly, i'm not experienced with the role so any idea i came up with would most likely suck donkey's butt.
terrible claim. Terrible. Why claim with absolutely no real pressure? Granted, I think that every role would have claimed this is they were to claim here. I just don't get the reasoning behind it. You also have all of the people talking about jesters and quick lynching on your wagon. Not going to get up to speed. Odd to claim here. DOesn't sit with me well.In post 117, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I claim vanilla town let's get on with Mohab.
Even the slightest hint of pressure and you claim? On d1? Very off here.In post 122, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Because there are other fish to fry.
Agree. This person is fishing for claims hard fucking core.In post 137, Quick wrote:
Lynch this... FUCK!In post 131, Mohab500 wrote:No idea what just happened and I am not sure how claiming VT came into this whole thing, but if we're lynching NPOM, I am up. Let's go!
VOTE: NPOM L-1.
overly survivalist.In post 164, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Of course I don't want to be killed how am I supposed to help the town win?
PAGE 8 and the M-word comes out. Meta is fucking bullshit and means nothing.In post 176, Sakura Hana wrote:Well I dont know his meta.
In post 196, Sakura Hana wrote:So I ask you, if I were scum why wouldnt I at least pretend to scumhunt?
lul what? It is wifom in both cases. That's the game. Scumhunting is townie. Town defending on d1 isn't because there is very little info to go off of. It also blocks others from scum hunting.In post 197, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Wifom much?
Setting up not playing townie here. Essentially you are saying, "it isn't scummy for me to not play townie" which is bizzare. Scum already know who everyone is. Town do not. WHy would you elect to make the town's life harder?In post 201, Sakura Hana wrote:What I'm trying to say is that me not scumhunting is NAI.
(And even then people have told me that townhunting is still scumhunting, which i disagree with, but whatever)
error. Wifom simply is. There either is such a situation or there isn't. There is not a legit wifom in this situation, I don't understand what ya'll are talking about.In post 214, NoPowerOverMe wrote:It's not for no reason wifom is generally scummy
Town hunting hurts town in the early days because scum will be inclined to kill the stronger town reads. This leads to less info and harder later days when leads are less clear. Telling everybody essentially "I will not vote for this guy" makes it so that scum can't bandwagon on them, and signals that they should kill that strong read.In post 223, Sakura Hana wrote:I've gotten townreads on you and Mohab, i'd say that's far from fencesitting.
ANNNNND this is why meta is shit. Scum play around their town meta and then town play around their town meta. It means nothing. Meta defense on page 10 is also ridiculous. You are essentially claiming, "hay, at the start of the game I always do this. I did this, ergo I am town". If you ever draw scum you are going to do the exact same thing and make this defense. God, I wish I were a double voter.In post 228, Sakura Hana wrote:And as a bonus, everything i've said about my meta and my personality is something you can research yourself, this isnt the first time I've been pushed for "not scumhunting" and i bet it wont be the last.
could be a fair point given how early it is. Still din't like the vote when it happened.In post 231, popopopopopopo wrote:he pissed me off
Odd vote given the fact that pork has only ntoe things that he finds scummy. There are also active players posting non-sense.In post 248, Firebringer wrote:i probably should have subbed out when porkens joined.
I really don't want to play with him.
w/e i can lynch him i guess. This is not reads based but i think i will continue voting this as long as i am here.
VOTE: Porkensafter a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
But why are you entertaining such a degenerate discussion then?In post 652, Sakura Hana wrote:Cooldog, the answer to that is no, you can find that in the normal game page, the only reason the jester discussion went on it's because it was clear some people believed it was possible and their reactions needed to be examined in that light.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
My god. Only meta reads. No discussion of actual game content. Meta reads are so easy. Anything can be meta. I need a 10 page essay including at least 15 games to be convinced of a meta read this early in the game.In post 265, Sakura Hana wrote:Norwe I feel like he's playing differently from 2138, but also he's done basically nothing so I'm conflicted.
Terrible erratic vote shifting once a wagon starts to fizzle onto the newest wagon that pops. No commitment to the reads that you claim to have.In post 267, Sakura Hana wrote:You know im just gonna OMGUS this.
VOTE: Porken
Seems more fun that anything that's happening right now and if Porkens being gone will make FB actually play the game then all the better.
Yes. This is exactly what I am thinking. I think it might be worth a vote.In post 271, NoPowerOverMe wrote:It's pretty hard to do both WIFOM and OMGUS in the first 24 hours of a game....
what the hell is this? I'm honestly perplexed. In the same breath you say you are going to stick on the wagon, and that you want to hop off after a time. Angling for wagons and for claims. No legitmate scum hunting is going on with fire.In post 310, Firebringer wrote:
right now my answer to this "never moving of from porkens" but if i am being honest. I might not stick to porkens forever.In post 309, Sakura Hana wrote:
So im assuming if you get a scumread that's not Porkens you will stop voting him? Or are you planning on policy lynching him.In post 307, Firebringer wrote:im gonna play this game regardless. i am just never gonna have a legitimate read on porkens.
i have a horrible time following through on pushing a person forever when i say "never moving my vote"
you have enough info so far to make a legitimate vote, and you are still simply voting for what are essentially rvs reasons. Seems like bad play to me.In post 314, Firebringer wrote:I can talk about it outside of game. Please sakura this isn't worth drudging up.
MORE ANGLING FOR SENSE LYNCHES.In post 317, Mohab500 wrote:Guess we've just got to lynch all of you troublesome players so we can avoid having difficulties reading people.
dsiagree. You only have one vote and it is early. Do you have quotes to back this stuff up. WHy is fire town? I don't see the scum vibes from porkins at this point in time.In post 323, popopopopopopo wrote:vote:porkens
sakura's point about shading without voting or even FOS is good, and firebringer is probably town.
you haven't played with me then.In post 327, Firebringer wrote:i consider myself number one worst player.
fair point. I understand the read now.In post 336, popopopopopopo wrote:
shading people without calling them scummy or voting them does nothing except increase distrust between the town members. the fact that you even said "i never called you scum" after the shading is also very bad.In post 328, Porkens wrote:
Why is her point about shading good?In post 323, popopopopopopo wrote:vote:porkens
sakura's point about shading without voting or even FOS is good, and firebringer is probably town.
Yeah, but it is page 15. There have been prolonged exchanges. The real question is why would town hypervote at this stage. The answer is that there is none. I see opportunistic wagoning during the volatile early stages.In post 349, Quick wrote:
They could just be totally non-serious as Scum, but it takes a read on the player to make that read so I think I agree with your reasoning for now.In post 345, Firebringer wrote:
it would have to be newb scum or scum who isn't thinking about how their actions will get their attention. Ur going to have to argue that scum!mohab is not trying to hide his pursuit of just mislynching anyone.In post 344, NoPowerOverMe wrote:@Firebringer - Couldn't hyper voting also be scum trying to get a mislynch?
Again, this is why meta is bullshit. You are voting based upon a sample size of 1 with no counter factual evidence for him being scum. Terrible idea to do this as town imho. BUT, I am very, very biased against meta reads. I don't think they are scummy because everybody does them (a strange meta-meta read), but still anti-town.In post 352, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well, to be honest. I could buy the read on Mohab. Because i've seen their play on a mini like ages ago as town, and it was pretty damn erratic. I don't know if they tend to be more calculating as scum though. Only seen their towngame.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
looking back this is fair. But it is odd that you are defending yourself based off of meta and not your actual in-game actions in themselves.In post 658, Sakura Hana wrote:
I'm pretty sure I never said it made me town but that it was NAI for me.In post 653, CooLDoG wrote:ANNNNND this is why meta is shit. Scum play around their town meta and then town play around their town meta. It means nothing. Meta defense on page 10 is also ridiculous. You are essentially claiming, "hay, at the start of the game I always do this. I did this, ergo I am town". If you ever draw scum you are going to do the exact same thing and make this defense. God, I wish I were a double voter.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
I prefer smoked pork.In post 381, Porkens wrote:In post 379, Firebringer wrote:why me? besides the fact i am scumfry me
I generally agree with this. However, this comes down to a question of "ethics" or "morality" as an analogy. Do we think that one's overall pattern of behavior and mentality are predominant (ethics) or do we think that the sum of their actions makes them scum (morality). I think it is some of both.In post 383, Mohab500 wrote:
I don't understand this. Isn't calling an action scummy more or less synonymous with calling them probable scum? I can see exceptional cases where this isn't the case but I think in a traditional early game like this, what you're saying doesn't make sense.
For the record I confirmed super, super early. And that is one of the reasons that I forgot about the game. Also my brother's wedding made me forget about it. Again, big sorry for not posting.In post 395, Sakura Hana wrote: CD hasn't been on site for 2 days, could be the person that hasnt confirmed.
Bad prod-doging with no content for the post. Making excuses instead of explanations.In post 412, Drew-Sta wrote:Morning again.
Still reading through. I’m usually not quite this inactive but weekends mean kid time.
Tbh, nothing has triggered me. The bickering is amusing reading though, so keep going.
Strange vote. Don't undestand. This comes out of nowhere.In post 418, Firebringer wrote:lets kill the king.
if i kill the king, i become next in line for the throne. even though im not his son.
captain firebringer, the prince of town. Sounds good to me
VOTE: Persivulstrange buddy here. Nopower has shown he has independent thought up unto this point.
WOWOWOWOW. This is trying to get votes on the board with no reason behind it. It is late enough in the game that actual reads should and can happen.In post 440, Firebringer wrote: i touch everything!
but if u have no reads, u doing a random vote right now isn't out of the question. Or am i wrong?
The only reason I don't want to vote for sakura is posts like this. Actively trying to engage with people. There is scum hunting going on with probing for the logic behind certain reads.In post 453, Sakura Hana wrote:
True, but you could have just said THAT instead of attacking me. And when I made that post you hadnt said that you didnt like townreading people early.In post 448, Drew-Sta wrote:You’re pressing this point. I’ve explained myself. I’m not required to have town reads yet and I’m not required to justify that either.
Several people here have gotten reads, and even if you're slow at getting reads or think that nothing can be gained from such, that doesnt mean you cant be asked if you have any TRs.In post 448, Drew-Sta wrote:You guys have collectively spewed 13 odd pages of shit. Suggesting I can get an accurate read in all that mess is optimistic at the least.
This is also something that you could've said. Instead of attacking me.In post 448, Drew-Sta wrote:The other guys not posting is also what I’m waiting for. I’d like to see how they engage. They’re kind of critical to the game too.
Let's just tell the scum who to kill tonight why don't we? If fire is scum, there is at least one scum in this list.
Drew-sta's 465 Not a big fan here. It is basically only defending. No effort has yet been put on him catching scum. He has plenty of time to defend himself, but none to actually catch scum it seems.
probing for town reads. This is scummy. Trying to see who won't get wagoned and so he can kill them later. Contemplating a fire vote.In post 473, Firebringer wrote:sakura, r u townreading norwee? should i be?
More meta-self referential posting about your own play. Not interested with scum hunting.In post 487, Firebringer wrote:im pretty sure scum me could dance around all but 2 players here.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
I hated meta when doing meta reads was meta. It is one of my schticks. I have not gone a game without saying "meta is bullshit". That is the one constant part of my meta.In post 662, Sakura Hana wrote:Why does it feel like all the old players hate meta? I get it, a bunch of people do meta wrong, but still it's SOME basis to start your reads.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
I don't understand why quick will not answer a simple question like this.In post 529, Quick wrote:
Ah, good. You found my reason. Thanks.In post 528, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
If you do not remember why popopopopopopo's vote on NoPowerOverMe makes popopopopopopo "looks to be town," there is no reason and as far as I am concerned, it does not.In post 155, Quick wrote:I like popo's vote on NPOM based on what I know of them as a player and the fact that NPOM DOES actually have some Scum equity IIRC.
clarify this for me please. Just throwing out "I think x is scummy, but maybe not" helps no one and you might as well submit a blank post.In post 550, Porkens wrote:Quick could be scum...something’s making me hesitate though so it’s not strong
This is a chainsaw, correct? There were also some strange interactions earlier between norwegian and sakura and monab.In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringer
I'm NOT A BIG FAN OF MONAB's read list in 622. Not sure if I just disagree or if there is something going on there. I don't know why asking questions makes one slightly scummy or hard to read. Doesn't that make one town? The drew-sta read is bizzare due to the fact that he doesn't scum hunt. I think there is something strange again, between norwegian and monab and sakura. Can't put my finger on it. But the way that they form a triangle of reading the other one as scum seems off to me for some damn reason. Maybe it is just anime avitars... hmmm....after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
And I am caught up now.
I could be persuaded to vote for fire, norwegian, sakura or monab. I think I will leave my vote on monab for now. I'ma gonna take a shower, check the game thread, go to the store, check the game thread while eating a late lunch.
Again ,big sorry for not being active. I know being apologetic like this is strange. But I do feel quite bad for not posting It was not my intention at all.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
I have expressed that I have a scum read on you. Mohab only has my vote on him. One vote will not produce as much activity in the game thread or reactions than if I went with another read which I hold to be more or less equal with another vote on them. You have a vote on you, so my voting for you will produce more activity than just leaving it to sit on mohab until other people vote for him... I don't want my vote to just sit there doing nothing.In post 673, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
I get your schtic. Hating meta, 'i am a super 2009 old-fashioned player with weird kinks'... yada yada.In post 669, CooLDoG wrote:Actually my vote on monab doesn't make since sit it will just sit there and doesn't produce activity.
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
But what is this? "It will just sit there, on Mohab." And then you vote me?
I was debating voting fire bringer, however, he seems to be consistently erratic. He is much harder to pin down. I want to see more of him before making a judgment on if it is a good idea to place my vote on that wagon. I also don't think voting him will produce any different reaction than he already has... So, that's why I voted for you over him.
-----------
Another interesting point is that there has been over 27 pages, but a strong wagon has yet to form. I find this to be quite interesting. By now someone would have typically gotten run up to l-2. Scum are either the initial votes on the current wagons, or they are hesitant to pile on and make one.
-----------
Again, one vote on someone does not produce that much pressure. Voting on you will.In post 674, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Are you suggesting Mohab would be too inactive to respond to votes? Because they immediately disproved that...
If I voted for firebringer would you think I was town?In post 676, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And yeah, this feels more like a war of the playstyles than genuine scum hunting from you Cooldog, i liked you initially but then your entire house of cards kinda fell apart at the end of your fancy little analyzis there.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
@prokins, Yeah, I don't like mohab, sakura, norweigian, and firebringer.
@norwegian, I do not think you are scummy for using meta. Re-read my post.... okay here we go:
"
This is a chainsaw, correct? There were also some strange interactions earlier between norwegian and sakura and monab.In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringer
[/quote]
Which reads as an easy justification for your vote, no actual content to why his actions are scummy. This isn't meta related, it is that your bar for justification has nothing to do with the actual game and you seem to admit that it is crap to start with...You are voting based upon a sample size of 1 with no counter factual evidence for him being scum.
To elaborate on the weird relation I was talking about look at posts like this:
Here we have a two strange shades but both back peddle oddly.In post 291, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Don’t have strong reads yet, but gut says Mohab for posturing all the time. Sakura Hana’s "low hanging fruit" shit also came out of nowhere. And i could see it as scum trying to look good by TR a popular scumread at the time.
Here for instance I would suspect you to vote differently. You have show suspicion of fire and sakura/mohab. I don't know where this is coming from. Never was explained.
With little pressure you overreact. Proving my point that voting for you will be productive.In post 369, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
BECAUSE HE VOTED ME BEFORE GOING BACK TO LURKING AND THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE.In post 367, popopopopopopo wrote:
why vote blurry over the other 3In post 365, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This game does have way too many inactive players right now.
@Drew-Sta
@CooLDoG
@Blurryface3189
@Persivul
Again, this post is an odd flip. You noted re provided justification for his read earlier, and you were joking around with him. I don't like it.In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringerafter a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
^this is what erks me. "L-1" reads as fishing for claims. Repeatedly does this.In post 682, Mohab500 wrote:Then we're all set on lynching Firebringer, right?
Alright, VOTE: Firebringer,L-1.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... aw_DefenseIn post 690, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Cooldog
Also i can't understand half of what you say. What are these chainsaws and back peddle things you mention?
Attacking a player's attacker.
^if you flip scum I am going to lynch the hell out of them. Also, why do you feel the need to defend them? They are not under much pressure (except for fire, which you scum read I think).NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Basically you hate all of the cool players.In post 683, CooLDoG wrote:Yeah, I don't like mohab, sakura, norweigian, and firebringer.
When you say "xyz person's vote and then leaving is unacceptable" i don't take that to be a joke. I highly doubt it was.NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Are you literally unable to fathom jokes?In post 683, CooLDoG wrote:With little pressure you overreact.
Do you scum read him?NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Cooldog
I bet you're going to townread someone extremely boring like Fredrick A Campbell. Ugh, old-fashioned snobs.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
alright, it is day 1. There has not be a significant wagon yet. Let's look at the time of when your votes and statements happend.In post 700, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Reads change over time. Novel concept i know.In post 698, CooLDoG wrote:Why did you say that the two of them (sakura/monab) are scummy, but then you go onto vote on the same wagon that one of them is on?
I'm town on Mohab right now, unlike you i liked their reads list.
Sakura i believe to be town if Firebringer is scum. And that's my current belief. I'd quote my case on him, but you hate meta so whatever.
vote happens in 287:You had previously town read him in here you then back track here. This seems to be your justifcation for voting, but, if you read it you are NOT talking about forwarding it being scum indicative, simply that you don't like it. During that time, mohab's vote was on NPOM in his 131 ( skura is on porkans in 267. In your 324 you don't like the porkans wagon. This seems reasonable because you are voting for mohab. Doubtful he voting his partner on d1 so early. It would be an odd bus. In 356 you park your vote on a lurker. Skipping along in 583 you pull the trigger on voting for fire BECAUSE they don't read sakura as town. This is scummy in itself in my opinion. This is a chainsaw defense. you don't buy fire's def. Mohab ships his vote to fire (625). In the very next post you affirm that you like this vote. But you still scum read him, right?
What is going on here? This is an odd dynamic. Please tell me that others see this as strange.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
You vote fire for not having the same town read as you. Then you are on the wagon that has one of your scum reads on it. And you hate the wagon that your strongest town read is on (and that's the same read you think fire is scum for). These three things together strike me as scummy. I'm not convinced to change my vote by your answers.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringerafter a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
In post 710, CooLDoG wrote:In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringerafter a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
In post 711, CooLDoG wrote:In post 710, CooLDoG wrote:In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringerafter a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
" I don't trust firebring" for the reason that "because their read on sakura makes no sense".https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/because wrote:Definition of because
1 : for the reason that : since rested because he was tired
OHHHH BOY. Nice Omgus vote.NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: Cooldog
Fuck you.
Also here dude, read this post of yours:
So do you town read sakura or not?In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=11844668#p11844668]post 693[/url], NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Basically you hate all of the cool players.In post 683, CooLDoG wrote:Yeah, I don't like mohab, sakura, norweigian, and firebringer.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
You better have reads after another 15 or so pages.In post 448, Drew-Sta wrote: You’re pressing this point. I’ve explained myself. I’m not required to have town reads yet and I’m not required to justify that either.
You guys have collectively spewed 13 odd pages of shit. Suggesting I can get an accurate read in all that mess is optimistic at the least.
The other guys not posting is also what I’m waiting for. I’d like to see how they engage. They’re kind of critical to the game too.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
Spoiler:
Fire does not town read sakura in 256.
Spoiler:
287, nowiegan votes mohab
Spoiler:
Fire town reads mohab 308
Spoiler:
347, Norweigan town reads sakura.
Spoiler:
Fire strongly town reads sakura. in 458. Which Norweigan presumably agrees with.
Spoiler:
583, Norweigan votes fire.
602, Remember Norwegian town reads sakura. see 638.In post 602, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also i'd like Sakura/Quick to actually explain why they tr FB, because that shit makes little sense to me right now.
625
after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
I'm actually 100% sober right now dude. I told you I was worse at this game than you my dude.In post 738, Firebringer wrote:
i think its pretty obvious that cooldog is on drugs right now. The dude acts like he doesn't even know me in his posts. I don't think he is all there right now.In post 726, Sakura Hana wrote:It'd be a pretty odd thing to lie about considering it's easily verifiable, dont think Cooldog's intent is to misconstruct events and it's more likely, he read it incorrectly.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
Pragmatism. But, to a certain extent yes. Why wouldn't you want to be happy?In post 761, Firebringer wrote:
I think cooldog would be the devil. I can't remember if this is true but i think cooldog philosophically embraces hedonism? He can correct me on that.In post 759, Farkran wrote:I can have two advisors
Like, the little angel and devil that appear on people's shoulders. Which one are you, cooldog?
If you read my catch-up you will see I asked plenty of questions. Hell, I literally just asked you why you kept saying that fire was scum without you voting for him.Quick wrote:
Beethoven guy.In post 748, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Who is this "other guy"? And what part of corndog's posts indicate lack of scum hunting to you? (Wanna hear your POV.)In post 747, Quick wrote:Some thoughts...
CooLDoG seems to NOT be Scumhunting.
The other guy asking a lot of questions DOES seem to be Scumhunting.
corndog (lol) seemed to be completely lack of asking questions. That would be the association between them. One is asking a LOT of questions and the other is pretty sparse with that.
I do agree with this.NorwegianboyEE wrote:
There's someone else who's activity has been fading.In post 756, Sakura Hana wrote:
Yeah, I was half excited to play with him again.In post 753, Firebringer wrote:man where is his majesty?
Speaking of where people are, is it just me or NPOM's activity seems to have diminished when the pressure on him faded.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
@Fire, so you are not saying these posts indicate some type of scum read for you?
In post 371, Firebringer wrote:
dont be mad ur teammate is bussing. yell at him in the scum pt u newbIn post 369, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
BECAUSE HE VOTED ME BEFORE GOING BACK TO LURKING AND THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE.In post 367, popopopopopopo wrote:
why vote blurry over the other 3In post 365, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This game does have way too many inactive players right now.
@Drew-Sta
@CooLDoG
@Blurryface3189
@PersivulIn post 438, Firebringer wrote:Sakura if u don't want me night killing u, u shall sheep me onto the king!
wow coercing people into voting people feels right.
i should have been prince long agoafter a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
Fredrick did some Socratic back and forth questioning for a while and has dropped out. I read most of his votes to be consistent. After receiving answers to questions he did drop his vote once.
popopo hasn't done much of note from my memory. He put down two basically rvs votes early. Votes porkans and town reads fire in his 323. His 336 explains that he thinks porkans is soft scum reading sakura without much justification, calling it "shading" (at least that's my interpretation). He hasn't really pursued a line of questioning with anyone, and I am very unsure of how he actually reads the game.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
I think Drew could be scum. Still doesn't seem like they are fully caught up, so I am waiting on that. They have no mention of scum reads, and they haven't expressed that they are taking the "find townie" strategy either.In post 793, Porkens wrote:
This is scum.In post 791, Drew-Sta wrote:Alright. It's Monday morning, I don't have meetings for two hours, and I have coffee.
We're at 32 pages. My reading from 23 to 32 showed Cooldog come into the scene. I think the thing he stated about meta just makes my heart sing so happy about that. Nevertheless there's a few things I am keen to go back and read through so in the process of going 1-32 now.
I will be more active from here on in.
VOTE: drewsta
Solid gold lock
But, why is this a solid gold scum read?after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
[/quote]In post 956, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Day 1 calling it scum, POrkins style read. Anime = scumafter a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
In post 814, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:and also to be questioned.
^ you are a hilarious meme. I agree with the others who think that this is a difficult slot to read. Better slots to lynch than you.In post 814, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:and also to be questioned.
-- Meta point, It is better to lynch people who others talk about, because mafia will engage and thus more information will be had to lynch other targets.
And trump stole my goddamn mother fucking vape.In post 815, Drew-Sta wrote:It's a big fat wall. Trump wishes he could build what I built.
.
.
Coherence not with standing. This is the best reaction it it I have
With unerlines are my demandi, questions.
Spoiler: IamHiTTiNGaVaPeWHiLeReaDiNGDisWaLLafter a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
nothing post, is nothing.In post 827, Drew-Sta wrote:FFS. Now it works...
@NPOM - I agree.
@FAC - It's pronounced 'Waaaahhll'.
You don't actually scum hunt,
Spoiler: Skakura's post 828
1) I am not clear on if drew is scum reading you or nah.
2) What the actual fuck are ya'll talking about?
Or longer if you are slow like me.In post 831, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Sure you can spend some time on it. It took me between 30 and 45 minutes.Post content, who do you read as what?
Scum flailing?In post 832, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I get ADHD with huge posts.
In post 833, Sakura Hana wrote:
Technically I do tho?In post 822, NoPowerOverMe wrote:
Don't you think that town SHOULD scumhunt though? And if so why don't you want to help town? Is it lack of confidence?Becuase you're also assuming that I brought my meta to be townread, when my intention was to tell people that me not scumhunting is NAI for me.
Townhunting is basically find town, and then PoE scum.
But yeah, I mean i found that my scum hit ratio was larger when I townhunt and my getting mislynched ratio was lower.
So now you are admitting that you are not playing to your meta, while not actually play to the way that you say you are going to play.
~More nothing posting.In post 834, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
This is the shortest version I can compile. Not sure if Drew-Sta would approve of this.In post 815, Drew-Sta wrote:It's a big fat wall. Trump wishes he could build what I built.
Spoiler:
Tl:dr - I think Nor, Sakura appear to be scum at this point. I think we need to wait for Farken and Pers to contribute before we can proceed much further.
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
Pages 28-32 are odd and I need to go review again. CoolDog's entrance changed the games dynamic a bit. I have to sift through what they've posted better as my initial thoughts are it didn't read right in placed and also read very well in others.
--------
But this was litterally what you were doing earlier.In post 835, Sakura Hana wrote:Anyway.
One thing i do not understand is why people think that I self-meta with the purpose of getting townread.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
Willfully making self irrelevant.... Null read.In post 820, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Guess I'm irrelevant now.
Also my question.In post 822, NoPowerOverMe wrote:
Don't you think that town SHOULD scumhunt though? And if so why don't you want to help town? Is it lack of confidence?Becuase you're also assuming that I brought my meta to be townread, when my intention was to tell people that me not scumhunting is NAI for me.
Why?In post 838, Fredrick A Campbell wrote: I'm also waiting for an answer, Porkens.
Since I have no other use for my vote now, I will VOTE: Porkens
Had a cookout homie, wasn't able to get online earlier today.In post 840, Firebringer wrote:anyone up
It's d1, already giving permission to lurk. Not sure if town or scum. VOTE: unvoteIn post 844, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Idk? I already feel kinda burnt out from this game. And it's been a glorious zero flips so far.
What the hell do you know about pacing?In post 848, Firebringer wrote:
got to pace urself my dude.In post 844, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Idk? I already feel kinda burnt out from this game. And it's been a glorious zero flips so far.What is time?<- plz answswer.
--------------In post 852, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
Or he could just be town.In post 843, Porkens wrote:It leaves me with the fact that you are still scum trying to look town by reading the game and telling us what you think we think you should think.In post 843, Porkens wrote:It leaves me with the fact that you are still scum trying to look town by reading the game and telling us what you think we think you should think.@POrkins is this towards fire or Sakura?<- If you don't answer you are scum.
@Fred, Are you thinking fire or sakura is town?<- if you do not answer you will get voted.
---------------
@Drew 858
1)What post of Sakuras is she telling people where to read. Give me the number[/u[
2)Do you think Sakura is playing to her town or her scum meta?
...) Dumb "meta" bullshit. Stop.
How) You are sheeping me
833quote) what are the inconstant reads?
835 quote) If you wanna vote for sakura I could follow you, but I want to see what the three votes go, and if fred answers my question.
--------------
Posts more about reading than not reading. Straight facts.In post 860, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I'm now online earlier than projected. I'll continue my reread of the thread.
Your vote on me is actually the definition of OMGUS. Just, fyi.In post 863, NorwegianboyEE wrote:That’s2 players i hate now. And no, it has nothing to do with OMGUS.
100%. That's my point sheep. Bow down and drink my koolaid. Wasn't I advising someone?In post 865, Drew-Sta wrote:
^^ That's a chainsaw. And the posts that follow. So yes, you did do it.In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringer
more avoiding contento!In post 867, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
It mentioned that more research is needed anyway.In post 862, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Wiki tells suck anyway.
I guess that’s all you can resort to when you eliminate meta and all beauty from your life?
Good point, why is his vote on porkans?In post 869, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
And they tunnel their vote on town because they don't like my playstyle.In post 868, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
I don't fully understand the reasons. Is it because they don't use meta?In post 863, NorwegianboyEE wrote:That’s2 players i hate now. And no, it has nothing to do with OMGUS.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
First actual post about actual shit.In post 872, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
I'm not going to scum-read you for your playstyle, but I am finding you very hard to read along with Firebringer and his merry men.In post 869, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
And they tunnel their vote on town because they don't like my playstyle.In post 868, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
I don't fully understand the reasons. Is it because they don't use meta?In post 863, NorwegianboyEE wrote:That’s2 players i hate now. And no, it has nothing to do with OMGUS.
Agree. We have time to kill. D1 lurker lynches may or may not be bad mojo.In post 874, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:No need to get personal.
Calling players oldies creates an in-group and an out-group, which could be very divisive.
Talking about DrewIn post 893, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Really like how you just clarify things and get everyone up to speed.
What the actual? This makes no sense. You are saying X is scum with, what 7 days left, and then you vote for the popular wagon. Oh, my god. Text book scummy behavior on the technical analysis. You give the illusion of activity, but say very little.In post 903, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
Since you've been claiming to be scum, I'll just treat you as such.In post 899, Firebringer wrote:
at least u didn't ask me if i was town. I would have had to say no, otherwise my honesty streak ends.In post 898, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
That's true. Unfortunately, I have no idea what I could possibly ask that will help me determine your alignment.In post 895, Firebringer wrote:u could always ask me questions
VOTE: Firebringer
L-3
In post 904, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:What do you two think of Porkens? Their recent changes of vote make little sense.Would you vote for porkins if there was not a wagon on fire?
So are you voting based on a rage boner? Is being an asshat alignment indicative? Why? Who? What? When? Where?In post 917, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Disrespectful? Criticism isn't disrespectful. Calling people names is.
~~~~~~ Bad read all around~~~~~~~~~~~
GIVE ME A SCUM READ LIST FREDRICK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
In post 870, Firebringer wrote:just tell people who continue to say "meta is trash" that they are trash.
seriously all the oldies who shout meta = bad don't even understand how to use it because they are fucking boomers.Give me the meta analysis then.
@Fire, I'll show you divisive:In post 874, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:No need to get personal.
Calling players oldies creates an in-group and an out-group, which could be very divisive.
Meta is still bullshit MY GUY.
(I am joking fredrich here ) I take zero beef with people who think meta means something. I will just get to a point where I won't read it. I just want fire to present a case for why a certain player is scum based upon their D1 play thus far. I won't read it, but if you think it is good play, then post it. I long for the day I can spit on the grave of "meta arguments"after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
In post 813, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I'll be online in exactly 1 hour (0545 GMT) for questioning.
But Norwegian and fire both seem to actually be playing the game. That's part of my VOTE: unvoteIn post 1140, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:CooLDoG, I was messing around in those few posts. You know as well as I do that those two players (NorwegianboyEE and Firebringer) are not taking this game very seriously, so, I didn't when I was engaging with them.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
OLD SHIT 880 - 897
Spoiler:
[/spoiler]
------------
New shit:
whole hearted agreement.In post 1144, Firebringer wrote:
ur face is bullshitIn post 1142, CooLDoG wrote:Meta is still bullshit MY GUY.
Answer my questions to you.In post 1145, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
I have not been using any of their posts to read them because all the posts they have made that I am aware of does not seem to determine their alignment.In post 1143, CooLDoG wrote:In post 813, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I'll be online in exactly 1 hour (0545 GMT) for questioning.
But Norwegian and fire both seem to actually be playing the game. That's part of my VOTE: unvoteIn post 1140, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:CooLDoG, I was messing around in those few posts. You know as well as I do that those two players (NorwegianboyEE and Firebringer) are not taking this game very seriously, so, I didn't when I was engaging with them.
GREAT FUCKING QUESTION.In post 1147, Sakura Hana wrote:
What reads do you ACTUALLY have then.In post 1145, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I have not been using any of their posts to read them because all the posts they have made that I am aware of does not seem to determine their alignment.
THEN WHY THE HELL YOU VOTING?In post 1149, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
Right now, I have yet to find a single real read. I'm still asking questions in a bid to get a read.In post 1147, Sakura Hana wrote:
What reads do you ACTUALLY have then.In post 1145, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I have not been using any of their posts to read them because all the posts they have made that I am aware of does not seem to determine their alignment.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
VOTE: fredIn post 813, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I'll be online in exactly 1 hour (0545 GMT) for questioning.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
In post 903, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
Since you've been claiming to be scum, I'll just treat you as such.In post 899, Firebringer wrote:
at least u didn't ask me if i was town. I would have had to say no, otherwise my honesty streak ends.In post 898, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
That's true. Unfortunately, I have no idea what I could possibly ask that will help me determine your alignment.In post 895, Firebringer wrote:u could always ask me questions
VOTE: Firebringer
L-3LIke dude, do you have a read or not?after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
"Kids" these days don't know a wall if it hit them.In post 913, Drew-Sta wrote:In post 870, Firebringer wrote:just tell people who continue to say "meta is trash" that they are trash.
seriously all the oldies who shout meta = bad don't even understand how to use it because they are fucking boomers.
I’m not a boomer. Don’t be a disrespectful dick.In post 873, Firebringer wrote:i seriously eyeroll anytime a boomer tells me "OHH META CAN BE MANIPULATED" like of course u fucking moron. the idea is to finding the nuances the player isn't aware of or has a hard time changing and using that to inform you of the player. Not this revolutionary idea. But boomers can't adjust because they tried using meta once or twice realize "ohh shit people changed I can't use this anymore" and then went "ohh well meta is trash" instead "Ohh this meta is outdated I need to readjusted".
I don’t use meta and I feel it is problematic but I don’t criticise people for using it. I simply pick apart the clear issues when they present.
In post 916, Firebringer wrote:i don't think its possible me playing mafia and not being a disrespectful prick....
can such a thing be done?
This seems to be theIn post 917, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Disrespectful? Criticism isn't disrespectful. Calling people names is.you are voting for firebringer.actual reason
BUT YOU STILL SAID HE WAS SCUM IN THE PREVIOUS POST I QUOTEDafter a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
In post 1153, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
Yes.In post 1150, Firebringer wrote:jesus, u have 0 reads?after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
so you are basically telling us a lie, right. LYNCH THE LIES!In post 813, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I'll be online in exactly 1 hour (0545 GMT) for questioning.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
Just scroll and look for the vote tags. Also, ISO homie.In post 930, Mohab500 wrote:I am honestly starting to get really lost, any idea which page I should start from to catch up to the current wagons?
GD boomer =/= mafia boomer.In post 932, Sakura Hana wrote:
Be careful, theIn post 928, Farkran wrote:Sakura - strong metareadboomersor whatever firebringer's been calling them are gonna come eat you alive xD
Now on a more serious note imma check what you mean about Quick.
read my 730 and my 731 to correct for my reading disability (as fire might call it if he were itching for a ban)In post 944, Mohab500 wrote:I just read the last 8 or so pages and my brain completely died. So can someone actually summarize the whole Drew-Sta VS Norwegian or Sakura or CoolDoG or whatever is going on here? What's with the wagon on Porkens, can I find actual reasons here?
What is your read on prokins.In post 946, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
What?In post 928, Farkran wrote:Porkens - this wagon had no reason to exist except pressure and i think the verdict is town
Descartes, Meditations, I think second meditation. Maybe the first.In post 951, Sakura Hana wrote:He thinks, therefore he exists.
confirmed.In post 952, Mohab500 wrote:You're all fucking weird.
Fire has basically cliamed vig at this point. Multiple times he has said shit like this. Fucking clown.In post 966, Firebringer wrote:i was planning on night killing quick so sureI do not.
Quick's 979 979. Agree. Don't like drew there. Vote from quick is natural. Farken's vote doesn't strike me as odd either.
agree. Weak ass vote.In post 994, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You kept using the word "chainsaw" like it would absolve you from any responsibility. But your main argument against me didn't even make sense. Yet you kept pushing. Just makes me believe your entire case was made in bad faith and you never intended to solve or attempt to do anything other than scumread me.
fince sitting scum, lynch whoever mentality.In post 1004, Sakura Hana wrote:I'm tempted to vote Porkens just to form 2 dueling wagons, but I wanna vote drew more and that's mainly coz i dont TR him and he SRs me and seems to not understand anything of what im doing at all.
1007 Not convinced by popopopo's meta vote.
very quick unvote by quick after people expressed reservations.
he should claim at l-1 like he said, agree.In post 1061, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I am against drew claiming.
why over dre-sta? I mean, farkin has reads...In post 1064, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I like you too hug.after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
In post 1183, popopopopopopo wrote:can i please just have one morsel of read sirBUT HE DID HAVE A READ THOUGH. NOW HE AIN'T TELLING US
AND NOW HE HAS A SHIT TON? WHat?In post 1188, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
It is exactly that.In post 1180, Firebringer wrote:Fred do u have conflicting thoughts on any players that make it hard to form reads....I have a hard time with this "I have 0 reads". Is there some posts that make u go town and others that go scum so ur not ready to make decisions. What is it?
I scum-read Quick in the first days then I see some posts other players make that present and argument suggesting Quick might be town, leaving me uncertain now.
I scum-read you, Sakura Hana, NorwegianboyEE, Mohab500, and NoPowerOverMe simply because you were just doing strange things and spamming the thread. But I also considered that the motivation may not be malicious and again, I am undecided.
CooLDoG and Drew-Sta, I truly never had a read on.
Mohab500, I mentioned earlier, but it was really their readlist that made me reconsider that scum-read.
I could give more details about the history of my fluctuating reads on the other players if you think that helps. I decided not to mention it because I thought it would have added nothing to the game.
Yeah, vote stays.
yeah, which now makes the point even more.In post 1190, Sakura Hana wrote:Ok that's much better than just "I have no reads"after a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
In post 1069, Firebringer wrote:
u shouldn't.In post 1068, Drew-Sta wrote:Farkran - I'm L-2. Why should I claim?
does anybody else want to join me on porkens here?Why is porkins scum, please tell meafter a wank.- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
- CooLDoG
-
CooLDoG Wanker
- CooLDoG
- Wanker
- Wanker
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
- Contact:
Don't no body tell me I ain't scum hunting ITT.In post 1213, Sakura Hana wrote:Honestly tho, in future games i might take a hint from CD and avoid mentioning my townreads and see how that works out.
Also caught up for the night. Will try to check more during the day tomorrow.after a wank. - CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG
- CooLDoG