Indeed it does.
VOTE: Firebringer
Indeed it does.
That was obvious from the moment this was a Normal game.In post 29, Quick wrote:Is this where I say I am not ACTUALLY jester? I am pretty sure that should be obvious at this point.In post 25, Mohab500 wrote:That's such a weird way of looking at it: I am proposing we lynch him in case we have no other reads, I'd rather mislynch a Jester than deal with a headache claiming to be a Jester the entire game, especially if we have no better leads. But I am not adverse to lynching someone else if we have to, I guess.
But they are tasty tho.In post 39, Quick wrote:Pancakes don't have agendas in case you didn't know.
Well I wont feel bad about eating them then.In post 43, NorwegianboyEE wrote:That's just what you think. Sooner or later that delicious pancake you left behind on your desk will turn out to have been buddying you all along, and stab you in your sleep.In post 39, Quick wrote:Pancakes don't have agendas in case you didn't know.
But you're quick...In post 62, Quick wrote:LaL... QUICK!!!In post 59, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Quick already said he was lying
That was back during graylist shenanigans, which was removed.In post 65, Quick wrote:You are allowed one non-normal role in a Normal game. That is what I remember, but YMMV.In post 61, NoPowerOverMe wrote:And a non-normal roll cannot be in a normal game by definition
So you wouldnt lynch a Jester claim to get it out of the way?In post 63, NorwegianboyEE wrote:-town equity on Mohab for taking advantage of a page 1 joke jester claim and egging a lynch on Quick. (They thought the claim was actually serious.)
Problem with that is that, Jester isnt exactly negative utility it's literally a different win condition, sure they can help town... if they want to, but their win condition encourages them to do things like acting scummy on purpose, spam posting, active lurking or who knows what else to encourage people to lynch them.In post 84, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Lynching negative utility is low-hanging fruit in my opinion
Normally I'd agree, but there were some people that believed Jester to be able to be included in a Normal and have done behaviour that can be analysed on that context.In post 93, popopopopopopo wrote:not that this shit matters, this is a normal
Your fault for making me think you quick lynched someone within 6 pages.In post 142, Mohab500 wrote:Did you really have to end it that quickly? The fun was just beginning.
Low Hanging Fruit.In post 160, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What is LHF?In post 157, Sakura Hana wrote:NPOM looks like LHF to me right now.
Hmm I see, I guess that does make some sense, but I dont see him trying at all to convince anyone.In post 167, Quick wrote:See aboveIn post 165, Sakura Hana wrote:If you believe his claim why does that not qualify as LHF for you.
Do you think Mohab was fake reaction testing?In post 171, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Mohabs quasi hammer was scummy and his jester position was scummy.
Wait what?In post 178, NoPowerOverMe wrote:That's because quick keeps on discussing ongoing games
How very observant of you.In post 181, Porkens wrote:My hot take is that Sakura, despite being second highest in activity, has not scumhunted at all.
I'm not gonna play how you want me to.In post 191, Porkens wrote:Quite defensive, still not scumhunting.
I am not getting into the whole townhunting vs scumhunting argument again.In post 193, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Scum hunting should be optional?
So I ask you, if I were scum why wouldnt I at least pretend to scumhunt?
There's WIFOM and there's things that make no sense.In post 197, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Wifom much?
If you think that then vote me instead of skirting around the issue.In post 202, NoPowerOverMe wrote:If you know that you not scum hunting is in NAI then maybe it is scummy.
Because if I were scumhunting that'd mean i'd be scum.In post 205, Porkens wrote:These don’t jive. First you imply that you would pretend to scumhunt as scum. Then you claim you’d imitate your tow game by town hunting. Why did you make these contradicting statements?
Well if i'm scum im clearly making shit up here, so, tell me, where am i making shit up in my play this game.In post 209, NoPowerOverMe wrote:This is just straight up bad wifom.
What other options do you think there would be then?In post 211, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Where you said there was only two options of your play style
First of all, I'm not doing any WIFOM, im just self-metaing to help you read me if you're town.In post 214, NoPowerOverMe wrote:It's not for no reason wifom is generally scummy
Sure i do that sometimes, when something scummy pops up at me.In post 218, NoPowerOverMe wrote:How about townhunting and scumhunting at the same time?
If i ignore who im townreading i'd say you, as I explained before you look scummy in a towny way and that's why I think you're Low Hanging Fruit, outside of that I'm not sure I have a read on Quick despite how much he has posted, but gun to the head i'd say town, and no one else that's posted leans one way or the other. Porkens for example could very easily be jumping onto an easy ML just coz i refuse to scumhunt like normal people do, but I can also see why he'd be annoyed by that as town, which makes it annoying to read.In post 224, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Who are the three scummiest players, regardless of if you think they are scum or not.
That is not wrong, but that's more part of my personality than anything.In post 226, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Town should not be afraid to make enemies and it sounds like you're afraid to make enemies.
I mean it was a pretty jerkish post if you dont like playing with him, but he quoted your in and then in'd himself after i invited you to play here.In post 248, Firebringer wrote:i probably should have subbed out when porkens joined.
I really don't want to play with him.
w/e i can lynch him i guess. This is not reads based but i think i will continue voting this as long as i am here.
VOTE: Porkens
Wild guess based on our last game together it's probably me.In post 251, Firebringer wrote:Sakura not gonna take a guess who i am townreading?
Sure, i suppose.In post 257, Firebringer wrote:i can pretend to townread u if it makes u feel better
You were shading me for not scumhunting, am i wrong in that assumption?In post 272, Porkens wrote:I’m not voting for you and haven’t called you scummy, so I’m not sure if what you are omgusingIn post 267, Sakura Hana wrote:You know im just gonna OMGUS this.
VOTE: Porken
Seems more fun that anything that's happening right now and if Porkens being gone will make FB actually play the game then all the better.
Partner here seems to imply you think im scum and norwegian is my partner.In post 191, Porkens wrote:Deflection. (Partner?)