[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 11847379 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Mini 2144: Yu-Gi-Oh Card UPick Game Over - Good Cards Win. - Mafiascum.net
In post 41, Crimson97 wrote:What are your philosophical thoughts on Jackson's entrance Socrates?
My experience suggests that it falls outside the dichotomy of what mafia and town would post, and is thus an unreliable metric to decide one's alignment upon to any extent.
Do you disagree? Why so?
Ah but there is so much overlap and your model doesn’t allow for the town aligned scum player eithrr
Not to be a buzzkill, but I (and I imagine others) have to highlight every one of your posts to actually read parts of it. This is already annoying, so good enough place to start.
I've never played in a game before with post restrictions like people are talking about. Anyone want to give me a run-down of an example? I mean I can see a trend, but what exactly the wording of that kind of thing might look like?
I have a feeling my reads are going to be a mess this game...
It is when he’s all I know you are but what am I he literally said he was tailoring his defense based not on the facts but on what I said the only conclusion I can draw is you are his printer GAME SOLVED
I ask that you take a look at Crimson and I. To me and a couple others it’s patently obvious that crimson is extremely scummy. He has not made a good faith effort to scum or town hunt in any way. He is skating through the shadows not taking risks and just staying active enough to go unnoticed.
Since my vote on him he has done nothing but try to counterpunch in the most obvious whataboutism and schoolgroundish “I know you are but what am I” and he even fails to be convincing at that.
I’m no paragon of scumhunting or towntelling myself, but I believe an honest comparison of our ISOs reveals a stark difference, and his ONLY defense is that his attacker is no better than him, which isn’t even true.
I’m throwing my hands up here. Anyone who can’t see the blatant self centered scum nature of crimson’s “defense” just doesn’t want to see it.
It is completely irrelevant that he voted me first. What I’ve said about him is all true regardless of that fact, and the comparison is the real distraction.
If there’s a more compelling scum case from or for any player, I’ll hear it but for now I’m here.
In post 251, Socratés wrote:Crimson, it is as though after the Porkens vote, you have solely focused on either Porkens or defense of yourself. Do you not want to learn the alignments of other players on your wagon, or in the game?
I wanted to wait a little to see what opinions people would give without me interfering.
And what have you learnt? Elaborate.
The things you learn from any wagon. Who sides with who, who takes a neutral spot and who decided to not get into the discussion. Also whatever Espeonage is doing. As the game developes these interactions will become more meaningful.
This is town.
No, it’s pointing out the obvious, which may be designed to make YOU nod along and say yep I agree with that so it must be coming from town.
Socrates readslist is total crap. You could say similar things about half the player list, including those who have like 4 posts. Elsa has been cool to me and she believed in me when the rest of you didn’t and I think she’s town. Crimson is rediculously scum and Elsa is the only one who sees that. I’m calling two scum in crimson and Socrates right now and those are solid gold locks. LYNCH CRIMSON LUNCH CRIMSON. Come on lurkers DO something with your life!
The problem is you are basing your judgments of others on your own biased egocentric construct of reality. You can’t escape your own head, so you are blind to the reality of the universe around you. Also you are just pulling this shit out of your ass.
In post 459, Socratés wrote:Aren't all judgments affected by personal experience and egocentric constructs of reality, and correctly so?
How do you know that your perceived construct of reality is the true reality?
Of course they are! But no not correctly so, as they blind us from truly unbiased judgment. We must remember that we are all blind. The difference between us is that I know I am. Therefore I am empowered to see what you do not
In post 479, Socratés wrote:It's rather funny that you say my belief is unjustified and objectively false, yet I must not question you because I accept there is no true objectivity.
Acryon and crimson sitting in a tree s c u m I n g! Seriously watching your parter acryon flair around I a vein attempt to stir up a last minute counter wagon is just a bit pitiful and oh so obvious.