In post 151, AGar wrote:So do you have any mild or moderate, or even strong!, scumreads? There’s plenty to go off of by now.
I do.
In post 154, Gypyx wrote: In post 144, gobbledygook wrote: In post 143, Gypyx wrote:and I don't think Hikari's questions call for an answer, unless Hikari tells me otherwise of course, in which case i'll answer
So then what do you make of Hiraki?
what's the point of that question? I just don't do anything about Hikari
I find it odd that you do not have an opinion about Hiraki who asked questions that you felt didn’t need to be commented on. I find it odd that notscience also did not have an opinion about Hiraki asking questions that had no follow up since notscience had a problem with me asking questions that did have follow ups and that I did follow up on.
What’s good for the goose is good for the
gander
turkey, amirite?
In post 155, Gypyx wrote:
so, you think an early probably town wagon is better than a delayed wagon?
i'm null about Espe right now, haven't done anything meaningful apart from claiming N1-vig, and I feel like this has been planned quite a while ago, so I don't consider this claim as alignement indicative
Most definitely. Any wagon is better than a delayed wagon. What makes you say that Flippy’s wagon is “probably town” ?
How come Espe gets null for something that is not alignment indicative but you’re scumreading me for something that I have said is not alignment indicative?
In post 160, CooLDoG wrote: In post 125, gobbledygook wrote:Well, the counterpoint to that is the information you’re getting now is the type, frequency, and substance of information you’ll be getting later in the game too. If you don’t think it’s lurky now, then it won’t be lurky then.
This is also just plain wrong. Player's can change over the timeframe of the game. You could be setting up some lurks later on.
That is a possibility, but then why not wait for me to fall into that habit? That would be a much stronger case than jumping down my throat
to eat my gizzard
saying I am planning something nefarious.
This entire line of questioning from Gypyx has really only reinforced my belief that waiting and letting things develop without much interaction is more efficient play.
Cooldog, do you think my current level and style of play is lurky?
In post 165, notscience wrote:Are you scum reading me or answering for someone else when they already explained what the reasoning was?
If that is your reasoning- what questions have I asked that haven’t been followed uo on? Have I not given stances on things and said that I Intend to play the same play style hoopla laid out?
Gypyx did not mean to quote your post when he made the above statement. How did you miss his post correcting the accidental inclusion of your post?