You're welcome!In post 544, Emperor flippyNips wrote:I feel like this is the most I’ve seen of pre-2010 join dates in one game, P—Coool
Hello ladies!
You're welcome!In post 544, Emperor flippyNips wrote:I feel like this is the most I’ve seen of pre-2010 join dates in one game, P—Coool
ah shit I claimed already
In post 15, Hoopla wrote:a meme claim, you say?
i don't know how i feel about someone treating the early game with such disrespect.
weak open. suspicious. only scum be so serious.In post 16, notscience wrote:In post 15, Hoopla wrote:a meme claim, you say?
i don't know how i feel about someone treating the early game with such disrespect.
Pretty good reads based on the first 2 pages.In post 37, Espeonage wrote:Currently I have cooldog and notsci as potential scum for going in to night prep immediately. Seems like a scum thing to focus on right now no?
Vote: Cooldog
Jeebus, that claim fell apart quickly....In post 38, Espeonage wrote:It's apparently not painfully obvious. I'm not a vig.
pre-emptive OMGUS eh? I might hold fire on the rest of my read through until we can all agree I'm not being lynched today. Let's go team!
You got any reasons for these votes bro?
me?In post 585, notscience wrote:Why do I know his name? Do you have a tell or something named after you?
In post 526, brassherald wrote:
PranaDevil, Gypyx,Emperor flippyNips(2):
LicketyQuickety,Espeonage(2):Hoopla
CooLDoG, HirakiHoopla(2):
UnaBombaH (2):renaissance, gobbledygook
CooLDoG (1):Espeonage
gobbledygook (1):AGar
Gypyx(1):notscience
renaissance (1):UnaBombaH
Not Voting (1):Emperor flippyNips
Espeonage has until about 1 PM EST to post or will be replaced.
There are (expired on 2020-06-17 06:05:00) remaining in Day 1
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.[/area]
I don't have tells, I'm amazing as scum. I'm...improving as town.In post 589, notscience wrote:And yes you
Excellent thanks.In post 588, notscience wrote:No one has claimed.
I’m voting you because espe expresses a read on me with reasoning that wasn’t true- my iso proved it. When questioned on it he avoided answering then just said he roped me in which shows he doesn’t care to discern my alignment which typically means he knew it
In post 593, notscience wrote:Do enlighten me. Because it took way too long to get a damn answer
In post 461, notscience wrote:His night prep comment re me never happened and when questioned he first stalled answering then said he just roped me in there which shows he doesn’t care to divine my alignment which typically means he knows it
Hold on a sec, the reason for your vote on me now is because of a gambit my predecessor ran on page 1? When you initially explained this I thought he'd done something else since. But you haven't noticed anything else more interesting or suspicious in over 20 pages since?In post 588, notscience wrote:No one has claimed.
I’m voting you because espe expresses a read on me with reasoning that wasn’t true- my iso proved it. When questioned on it he avoided answering then just said he roped me in which shows he doesn’t care to discern my alignment which typically means he knew it
Big effort, big brain here.In post 411, Hiraki wrote:hoopla -
do you have any evidence to backup whatever this stupid "HAHA" system is? those numbers have no value unless there's something behind it. i didn't see anything after a quick search. not to mention, your model has a lot of assumptions that i don't know who would get behind, without further analysis (which is why I am skeptical of it in the first place, as neat as I think game theory in mafia is) - for example, your model goes into the fact that 39/50 games have "scum" as being under 23%. How is the 23% calculated? Could there potentially be a point where 2 scum are slightly above that threshold and one scum drags them down? Then I don't think 23% is a fair number, no? And if 23% goes up, I'm sure that 39/50 is not solid either. Which means that your underlying "towntelling" theory isn't very valid and doesn't make sense.
i did a little digging too - no one in this game has posted over 23% when taking a sum of the average and the average of all in the thread as of your data set was 30.615. that would mean that your circle conveniently misses the one person that everyone has put up weird looks for in your town block -renaissance. what is evenmoreconvenient is that the number you went with to highlight your data was 23 while renaissance has24posts.
lastly, if we get rid of the two outliers in this thread (i think this helps the dataset become more uniform but i understand the underlying problem here) - your average goes from that 30.615 above to 32.991 which gets rid of every player but Gypyx, gooble & CooLDoG
i don't think this really makes a lot of sense and i'm starting to just feel weird about the clearly soft defenses of renaissance here that don't consider anything that renaissance has posted
Haha I didn't know anyone "hated" me as such, just thought I sucked! It's just a game, and I tried my best...In post 596, farside22 wrote:Hi bm! You know i was killed n2 and that was before that game went to shit. So i don't hate you.In post 578, Battle Mage wrote:Ok a few questions:
1. Why are people voting for me?
2. Have I claimed yet? If so, what did I claim?
3. Who else has claimed?
Also hi Farside, nice to see you again!
If your town i hoped you learned from that game.
This interaction with ns makes me feel better about him.
I'll post some explanation on Gypx later, just read his ISO for now!In post 600, farside22 wrote:I am on page 6 so im not sure why ns still has a scum read from page 4.In post 598, Battle Mage wrote:Haha I didn't know anyone "hated" me as such, just thought I sucked! It's just a game, and I tried my best...In post 596, farside22 wrote:Hi bm! You know i was killed n2 and that was before that game went to shit. So i don't hate you.In post 578, Battle Mage wrote:Ok a few questions:
1. Why are people voting for me?
2. Have I claimed yet? If so, what did I claim?
3. Who else has claimed?
Also hi Farside, nice to see you again!
If your town i hoped you learned from that game.
This interaction with ns makes me feel better about him.
Don't worry, in every game since I've been very clear that my reads suck. And actually, I've been on a good run of form since then!
NS is my only scumvibe at the moment - it's a bit of a copout to just stick with your read from Page 2, when it's now Page 24, and it wasn't a very good read to begin with. Easy scumplay, unlikely for town to be that obsessive (I realise people like me are the exception!)
Farside are you town here? I'm gonna need a pinky promise I'm afraid...
Why is gypx scum? I know i had a scum ping on him early on.
Im town. Ill probably die by n2 again.
You're seriously going to try and lynch me on Day 2 on the basis of a bogus Vig claim?In post 602, CooLDoG wrote:no, I just thought you were double backing on your vig claim from espe, meaning actually coming back and claiming it legitimately. THen i realized it makes sense to wait for d2 if that were the case.In post 583, Battle Mage wrote:pre-emptive OMGUS eh? I might hold fire on the rest of my read through until we can all agree I'm not being lynched today. Let's go team!
1. Did I fool you before?
Unfortunately I'm not going to spend time trying to explain what you already know, in respect of my predecessors actions which could scarcely matter any less anyway.In post 606, notscience wrote:Basically I felt really weird and not sure how I wanted to play it coming in and just focused on brain spew and have since relaxed
Ah sorry GG, I remember now!In post 608, Battle Mage wrote:1. Did I fool you before?
2. Looks like I sorta fooled you here if you're voting for me...
Hi Hoopla!In post 612, Hoopla wrote:hi farside and battle mage! welcome to the game.
i'm looking forward to us olds showing these whipper snappers a thing or two about mafia. here is an advanced move that will shock the readers: an aggressive wagon-hop based on intuition
UNVOTE:
VOTE: unabombah
Haha no I can definitely still bust a move or two, if the beat is right.In post 615, Hoopla wrote:@turkey
thoughts on una? i sense a potential speedwagon opportunity...
~~
@BM
i always thought it was the olds who had the ability to pony up and make difficult decisions, unlike these kids who need to waffle on for 1000+ posts before lynching someone. don't tell me you've lost your touch!
yea prolly…In post 620, Hoopla wrote:actually, i may be mixing you up with vollkan.In post 619, Battle Mage wrote:a bastion of logic? I nearly spat frooty loops all over my screen!
I'll give your posts the dignity and respect they deserve after I've slept.
no matter. pretend you are him;)
try turning it off and on againIn post 635, Hiraki wrote:literally nothing happened in the last 5 pages
I agree with this. Bringing up a traitor is mildly scummy, definitely not a towntell as some are inferring...In post 624, notscience wrote:A few people (namely me and agar) think there is as no reason a new person brings it up out of the blue unless they are scum with a traitor or the traitor
But lynching someone bc they might be a traitor is kinda a witch hunt
How about Gypyx.In post 634, UnaBombaH wrote:If farside and BM make good catchups, there may still be hope for a solid D1-lynch.
I didn't bring up the traitor thing. Also you claimed you went through every role in the wiki? And you're worried there's a traitor here?In post 642, Gypyx wrote:and battle mage, i've already explained why I'm cautious of traitors in post 378 and I was notspecificallyhunting traitors you know, I consider it as a scumread like the others and therefore I bring it up
so, can we avoid going through another 5 pages of traitor spec?
Don't worry, we won't be dumb enough to lynch youIn post 667, CooLDoG wrote:I am the most obv town player in this game. Can't wait to say I told you so if you dummies lynch me.In post 664, farside22 wrote:I'm procrasting a lot on reading. I'm playing this out even if I just go from here and get reads. Right now. Still feeling Cooldog as scum.
GG: I'm curious why you are sheeping people this game. I don't recall you doing that without voicing your own thoughts.
I can dig some of that dogIn post 664, farside22 wrote:I'm procrasting a lot on reading. I'm playing this out even if I just go from here and get reads. Right now. Still feeling Cooldog as scum.
GG: I'm curious why you are sheeping people this game. I don't recall you doing that without voicing your own thoughts.
Perhaps you can start by going one better than your predecessor, and explaining your vote on me?In post 732, bob3141 wrote:so can the main proponents of the leading wagons explain the case
And can the leading opponents explain the case against the wagons
oi, I was the first one to say Gypyx is scum, I want the credit.In post 731, gobbledygook wrote:If Agar was right and Gypyx is scum, I’m going to have egg all over my face
Don't worry, I'm at my best when the deck is stacked against meIn post 714, brassherald wrote:I apologize, my mouse is breaking so I must have pasted twice. Should be getting a new mouse today
Voting scum now doesn't completely clean your slate with me. This is little more than a vanity wagon now unfortunately, and you waited until -1 to do it? It's a bit limp.In post 723, notscience wrote:Want to cournerwagon Gypyx with me?
don't ask me, ask Notscience - he gave me that treatment when I replaced in too.In post 740, bob3141 wrote:In post 733, Battle Mage wrote:Perhaps you can start by going one better than your predecessor, and explaining your vote on me?In post 732, bob3141 wrote:so can the main proponents of the leading wagons explain the case
And can the leading opponents explain the case against the wagons
How can i explain someone elses vote Im not a mind reader.
UNVOTE:
Bad posting? It's a readslist...wtf were you expecting!?In post 741, PranaDevil wrote:This is bad posting.In post 738, Battle Mage wrote:I'm assuming:
Emperor Flippynips
Unabombah
Gobbledygook
Hoopla
Klick
are all town.
easy game so far.
All three of my scum reads are on this list.
I can dig all of that (except C, but whatevs...)In post 739, notscience wrote:I’m pretty sure that’s a bad misinterpretation of how I approached it.In post 737, Battle Mage wrote:Voting scum now doesn't completely clean your slate with me. This is little more than a vanity wagon now unfortunately, and you waited until -1 to do it? It's a bit limp.In post 723, notscience wrote:Want to cournerwagon Gypyx with me?
I brought the wagon to l-2, he did his shady fos thing. I called him out on it and then he brought it to l-1.
I voted him because
A)id already been suspecting him most of the day check my iso
B) that vote was sketchy as fuck, his entire last few pages was
C)klick asked for more time.
excellent...I'm all in!In post 744, bob3141 wrote:Do i have to hold a card to my head.In post 743, Battle Mage wrote:don't ask me, ask Notscience - he gave me that treatment when I replaced in too.In post 740, bob3141 wrote:In post 733, Battle Mage wrote:Perhaps you can start by going one better than your predecessor, and explaining your vote on me?In post 732, bob3141 wrote:so can the main proponents of the leading wagons explain the case
And can the leading opponents explain the case against the wagons
How can i explain someone elses vote Im not a mind reader.
UNVOTE:
Your card is the jack of spades
I assumed it was a typo based on your sig, so I corrected it.In post 750, CooLDoG wrote:I'ma gonna grill some pork chops, corns, and some pineapple. Been masturbating all day.... gonna catch up tonight.
Hey, the devil's in the detail, if you know what I mean.In post 753, PranaDevil wrote:I've never been mentioned in your ISO as a scum read of yours... so that's a very interesting statement...In post 746, Battle Mage wrote:Bad posting? It's a readslist...wtf were you expecting!?In post 741, PranaDevil wrote:This is bad posting.In post 738, Battle Mage wrote:I'm assuming:
Emperor Flippynips
Unabombah
Gobbledygook
Hoopla
Klick
are all town.
easy game so far.
All three of my scum reads are on this list.
I'm not really surprised though - given one of my scumreads is YOU.
i'd be voting prana way ahead of una. and keepin' it real - the unabombah wagon ain't shit right now. Momentum says we lynch Gypyx.In post 757, Hoopla wrote:i have a prana/unabombah scumteam, by the way.
not sure who the third is yet, but it isn't the turkey. i'm quietly confident he is town, and am hoping the non-voters, replacements and vanity vote-parkers select una ahead of him.
scummy as hell!!In post 758, notscience wrote:What did you think of gyps l-1 vote and the actions leading up to it
GG is in my townblock, definitely not lynching him today, he's conftown.In post 784, UnaBombaH wrote:Wait wait, but why Gypyx over Gobbledy?In post 759, Battle Mage wrote:i'd be voting prana way ahead of una. and keepin' it real - the unabombah wagon ain't shit right now. Momentum says we lynch Gypyx.In post 757, Hoopla wrote:i have a prana/unabombah scumteam, by the way.
not sure who the third is yet, but it isn't the turkey. i'm quietly confident he is town, and am hoping the non-voters, replacements and vanity vote-parkers select una ahead of him.
if she scum, she know you town tho?In post 823, Emperor flippyNips wrote:In post 807, Hoopla wrote:don't be shy una.
maybe this is the watershed moment that can help unite us and make us realise we're both town?? a moment of divine compromise.
and then i die and you realize im town & i find out you're scum?
i'll reserve judgement on that for nowIn post 838, notscience wrote:Also just saying it’s incredibly obvious the rotating door slot is town.
excellent, I am on bored!In post 1001, UnaBombaH wrote:L-2 apparently- be aware about this potentially being false since official votecount hasn't been given in a while.
brunch me daddy!In post 1009, notscience wrote:I haven’t had the chance to read in depth yet bc it’s hella walls
We’re out getting brunch I intended to read this morning but surprise last minute plans