Newbie 2010: Pride Month | Game Over
Forum rules
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I don't understand any of these posts about "hoctac"In post 33, Umlaut wrote:I'm like 95% sure it is, but Hoctac trained me not to believe anything he said.
Umlaut pls explain- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Hmm I think Snow is townIn post 98, Snowblaze wrote:@Elmo: I wouldn’t say I’m getting defensive so much as not really understanding why you suspect me.
@Ghost Ganster: Homura has been relatively inactive as town in previous games.
Could you explain why you want me dead? And why you think Umlaut is town?
Pedit: I wasn’t flipping out or panicking at all.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I don't understand my predecessor's push on Snow either but I don't see why she would do something so abrasive if this slot were scum when she's plenty experienced enough to know it would become low hanging fruit
Pii and Ghost Ganster (now M2H? Haven't gotten that far yet) aren't scum together, I'm pretty sure
and I don't think Raya and Pi could be scum together either
I feel pretty good about Raya being town but admittedly I am biased simply because I agree with so many of their posts
I'm only on page 7 but I have a stronger-than-typical-by-page-7 scum lean on Ghost Ganster
His long post was the sort of ramble that I have definitely employed as scum to sound like I am evaluating people and really trying to get reads, but without actually making my mind up much on anybody. Like, the way that there are so many posts that have scum equity to him SO early on in the game just feels more like a scum player who is actively trying to read every post in a bad light in order to scum case them and keep multiple push options open. The scum read is then seriously compounded by the fact that after that noise, and with real substance in the game, he defaulted to a poke-the-lurkers stance. He even said that he tries to have reads early in the game to the point of forcing/faking them early on, used that stance to criticize another player for not having strong reads by like page 5, but all he came up with after those posts is policy voting a lurker. That just feels like scummy hesitation because the scum equity posts he talked about feel like too much of a reach even for him.
I have a town lean on Snow for the unnecessary defense of Homura (insofar as saying that inactivity is NAI) and a town lean on Pi for their reaction to the big Ghost Ganster post and Raya's commentary on it, even if I disagree with it. Essentially... I agree with Raya's 139.
I think GG's 163 misconstrue's Raya's posts quite a bit but I'm not sure yet if it was intentional or not. Scum!Pi had the option of siding with GG to scumread Raya or siding with Raya to scumread GG but did neither and considered both town which is something that town is more likely to do since there's no scum agenda. So the concept of scum trying to look busy doesn't apply here at all because that requires shading people without actively pushing them. Raya explains this well in 188
I can't precisely pinpoint why but I have a gut scum lean on Umlaut and Gibus as of page 8- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I totally agree with this sentiment as well.In post 203, Snowblaze wrote:
I feel like scum would be more likely to go after easy targets than someone seeming towny very early on. Not very strong, but at that stage it was better than nothing.In post 199, Raya36 wrote:I'd be interested to hear that town lean explained more actually.
Do you think scum would force a town read on me?
pedit: well, not my fault I happened to post at that time, is it?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
My anecdata has showed the opposite; scum are more wary of the optics of wagon hopping while town are frequently all over the place chasing down one lead or anotherIn post 210, Hectic wrote:Scum are found more often on wagons. I guess you've never played with Bob before, because he'll drive that point home until you're mad. Obviously everyone is found more often on wagons, but scum are generally more wagon hoppy/opportunistic, since they're happier to wagon anyone that isn't them, while town may go vanity for others.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
If I were in the game when this post was made I would be more understanding but I was not so I do not understand where the sentiment comes from, particularly if it'sIn post 289, gibus wrote:
From the perspective of scum, scumreading a top townread is a viable option to keep town disorganised. It maybe a ballsy move to do as scum, but that can't be a reason to townread an experienced player IMO.M2H wrote:
This vote on my slot would be a ballsy move for scum considering that at this point my slot from the perspective of the scum team was already being townread/seemed like a slot that would obv quickly.In post 140, Raya36 wrote:
ghost as my scumread right now. Pi is my strongest townread as well.In post 136, gibus wrote:Raya, do you have any scumreads?
Which reminds me I should do this:
VOTE: Ghostspecifcally for this game.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Well I'm caught up now, but I can't believe how close to deadline this game is for having only 14 pages. There's not a ton of alignment indicative interactions yet simply because it's been slow and there has really been a lack of real time interactions.
I'm sorry that Elmo wasn't able to come in and answer the questions but I know that she is an extremely busy person between her job and probably like modding 3 games at a time.
Anyway, I don't see her case on Snow and I generally disagree with it.
I have a town read on Raya, town lean on Snowblaze and Pi, null-paranoia on Hectic, entirely-null on Homura, scumlean on Umlaut (Umlaut is a pretty darn good player so I haven't seen anything here that isn't, IMO, a "towny" or "scumhunting" post which would be easily imitable by Scumlaut), Gibus, and Ghost.
However, I concede that M2H's posts were pinging me as town instead of scum unlike Ghost's posts.
VOTE: Gibus
Gibus you have been all over the place today and not explained a whole lot of it. You somewhat explained your reads on Elmo and Raya but now neither are in your lynch pool, while I've not seen you case either Hectic or Homura at all. Why did they suddenly become your preferred lynch pool? I mean, why am Inotin there if you were scumreading Elmo AND particularly paranoid about me after our last game together?
I'm going to be around for a few hours even if I'm just mobile posting while a bit stoned on painkillers. Let's see if we can properly resuscitate the game in its last 40 hours.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
My bad, I misread this post and mentally swapped "town!" And "scum!" because several people were strongly scum reading ElmoIn post 101, gibus wrote:I read Elmo's 1989 scum game and 2000 town game and noticed that town!AzN was aggressive with their votes (mobile) similar to their play here, while scum!AzN was much more static.
Does this hold any significance?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
In post 335, gibus wrote:I don't think Scumlaut would hop on three different major wagons knowing that wagon analysis is a hot topic. That's part of why I'm townreading himDons SE hat
Wagon analysis is only really applicable after a flip has occurred and is therefore not usually mentioned in the middle of day 1
Removes SE hat
So that makes this very strange reasoning to give Umlaut a pass
Sometimes town hops all over the place pressuring multiple people; sometimes scum do it because they don't much care who gets mislynched so they're not committed to any particular vote. You have to analyze motivations for doing so and a player like Umlaut wouldn't be worried about the raw optics of voting different wagons.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I feel like we were in a game together years ago but that's not the pointIn post 355, Umlaut wrote:Nauci, where have you seen my play and decided I'm so good? I don't deny I'm pretty decent at playing scum, but if we've been in a game together I don't recall it.
The point is that you've been around and active for years and therefore are unlikely to do newbscum things like over worry about optics as either alignment- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Not reallyIn post 364, Homura wrote:
Is there anything concrete substantiating your scumread of Umlaut other than paranoia?In post 333, Nauci wrote:scumlean on Umlaut (Umlaut is a pretty darn good player so I haven't seen anything here that isn't, IMO, a "towny" or "scumhunting" post which would be easily imitable by Scumlaut)
My gut just feels not good about him but I have absolutely no idea why- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
The way Raya and Hectic switched gears into Gibus just feels really scummy for gut reasons I can't currently explain.
I feel like Raya was a bit too eager to accept my town read of her and read on the rest of the game and is now considering me pocketed, but I'm also a very very paranoid player who frequently thinks my top town read is scum ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Hectic I felt was entirely null until a player who, with apparently literal decades of experience, didn't realize he was making a L-1 vote. Thoughts, Umlaut?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
That's fairIn post 377, Raya36 wrote:
Idk what you mean by too eager but I only have you as a town lean. I don't feel like even if I was scum I'm in a position to consider you pocketed? But maybe from your POV you feel that wayIn post 375, Nauci wrote:.
I feel like Raya was a bit too eager to accept my town read of her and read on the rest of the game and is now considering me pocketed, but I'm also a very very paranoid player who frequently thinks my top town read is scum ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I have a habit of being very paranoid about my top town read (s) right at the end of day 1
Gibus where are you- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Goddamnit lmaoIn post 379, Umlaut wrote:I agree failing to notice an L-1 is not a good sign, but if 68 is your source for "literal decades of experience" then you should note that that's an even-numbered post.
I guess I didn't pick up on that trend until a few pages later- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I really hate how much of the day Homura has spent not voting
VOTE: Homura
My lynch pool today is Hectic, Gibus, Homura. It seems significant that Hectic and Gibus are both at -2 and that both of those wagons built up quickly at EOD and they're voting each other. Surely both aren't scum together but it makes me paranoid that neither is scum. However, this could also just be because town finally realized there's a need to collapse onto a lynch at this point after my wagon fell apart?
I think we need to scrutinize the people who hopped off of my wagon and onto one of Gibus or Hectic with very little reason or commitment, so... Hectic or Umlaut?
Right now I'm scumreading Hectic more than Gibus. I realized that I misread Gibus's post about elmo and think that it is actually rather town of him to go against some vocal town leaders and give Elmo a town read. Obviously, Elmo wasn't even around enough to consider that a good target for pocketing, and there were plenty of low hanging fruit posts there to park an easy vote. Since I know for a fact that my slot is town, I also know for a fact that he wasn't doing it to protect a scum buddy. My suspicion is still largely based on the way Gibus switched around at the end of the day to 2 people in his POE which he's never provided a reason to scum read, and eagerly await his response.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
When are you referencing here? I don't specifically remember this happening I guessIn post 389, gibus wrote:In a game I played (NEWB 2004), a scummer scumread a player for lurking and being unmotivated unlike their other ongoing games, where they were active. That's probably why I'm biased to think this was a bad faith push. Although I'm certain this is what scum would go for.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I don't understand. Lilith didn't mention votato being active in other games anywhere as far as I can tell?In post 391, gibus wrote:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11830569In post 390, Nauci wrote:
When are you referencing here? I don't specifically remember this happening I guessIn post 389, gibus wrote:In a game I played (NEWB 2004), a scummer scumread a player for lurking and being unmotivated unlike their other ongoing games, where they were active. That's probably why I'm biased to think this was a bad faith push. Although I'm certain this is what scum would go for.
I think I subconsciously tied not developing reads to lurking with votato's drop in activity in that game. Still, I'm not bad faith pushing Hectic.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I assume you meant 385 when you said 384?In post 400, Homura wrote:
This is a really strange vote considering you haven't indicated an inkling of what your progression on my slot might be and your explanation for doing so in 384 seems disingenuous. What exactly were you hoping to get out of me?In post 385, Nauci wrote:I really hate how much of the day Homura has spent not voting
VOTE: Homura
My lynch pool today is Hectic, Gibus, Homura. It seems significant that Hectic and Gibus are both at -2 and that both of those wagons built up quickly at EOD and they're voting each other. Surely both aren't scum together but it makes me paranoid that neither is scum. However, this could also just be because town finally realized there's a need to collapse onto a lynch at this point after my wagon fell apart?
I think we need to scrutinize the people who hopped off of my wagon and onto one of Gibus or Hectic with very little reason or commitment, so... Hectic or Umlaut?
Right now I'm scumreading Hectic more than Gibus. I realized that I misread Gibus's post about elmo and think that it is actually rather town of him to go against some vocal town leaders and give Elmo a town read. Obviously, Elmo wasn't even around enough to consider that a good target for pocketing, and there were plenty of low hanging fruit posts there to park an easy vote. Since I know for a fact that my slot is town, I also know for a fact that he wasn't doing it to protect a scum buddy. My suspicion is still largely based on the way Gibus switched around at the end of the day to 2 people in his POE which he's never provided a reason to scum read, and eagerly await his response.
I have a null read on you based on your posting, but I find it scummy that you've not been using your vote the entire time. I wanted you to explain why you have not been using your vote to pressure and scum hunt, as well as more commentary on the recent developments before EOD, and I thought that voting you might successfully cause you to do so. Plus, I like to use my vote to get something done at all times but wasn't ready to put either of the other two at L-1 yet, so I voted the last person in my POE.
I definitely admit that this can look strange, but I really don't think it can be construed as scummy as scum have every motivation right now to pick one of the 2 existing wagons this close to end of day when obviously one of them would have to be town if I were scum.
So, take my post at face value: I don't like that you haven't been voting and want to know why.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
In post 289, gibus wrote:
From the perspective of scum, scumreading a top townread is a viable option to keep town disorganised. It maybe a ballsy move to do as scum, but that can't be a reason to townread an experienced player IMO.M2H wrote:
This vote on my slot would be a ballsy move for scum considering that at this point my slot from the perspective of the scum team was already being townread/seemed like a slot that would obv quickly.In post 140, Raya36 wrote:
ghost as my scumread right now. Pi is my strongest townread as well.In post 136, gibus wrote:Raya, do you have any scumreads?
Which reminds me I should do this:
VOTE: Ghost
Gibus, regardless of the fact that you changed your mind, I want to know what you were thinking at the time when you made these posts.In post 299, gibus wrote:
I was talking about this game in particular, not a general thing.In post 297, Hectic wrote:I don't get 289, gibus. Scumreading a top town attracts a lot of unwarranted attention. Where have you seen scum do this before as a strategy?
Where else can scum try to shoot at?
Why did you say that your point about keeping town disorganized applied to this game in particular?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
In post 404, Homura wrote:
Take it as a matter of circumstance, I guess? I generally vote only after having a degree of certainty in my reads, and I have been lacking a concrete scumread for most of the dayphase up until the point where I ghost voted your slot. But I'm hard-pressed to see why abstaining from voting entirely is scum-indicative.In post 401, Nauci wrote:So, take my post at face value: I don't like that you haven't been voting and want to know why.
My previous comments about voting answers both of these.In post 408, Homura wrote:
I mean, when you essentially naked vote me a day before deadline and the rest of your post is about why players other than me are scummy, I'd gather only that you scumread me and are willing to end the day with my lynch. It felt like you would have voted Umlaut and asked me the questions you did in this post, but instead you went about it in this roundabout way — provoking me to ask you first before pressuring me — and I just find it difficult to see this coming from a town-motivated perspective.In post 401, Nauci wrote:I have a null read on you based on your posting, but I find it scummy that you've not been using your vote the entire time. I wanted you to explain why you have not been using your vote to pressure and scum hunt, as well as more commentary on the recent developments before EOD, and I thought that voting you might successfully cause you to do so. Plus, I like to use my vote to get something done at all times but wasn't ready to put either of the other two at L-1 yet, so I voted the last person in my POE.
I definitely admit that this can look strange, but I really don't think it can be construed as scummy as scum have every motivation right now to pick one of the 2 existing wagons this close to end of day when obviously one of them would have to be town if I were scum.
I don't think your defense WRT the competing wagons holds water when scum generally prefers not to be limited to choosing between their partner and a townie.
For town, even for Town PR, your vote is your number 1 scum hunting tool. It's used to apply pressure to various players in order to provoke reactions which will generally be a lot more alignment indicative than just "ghost voting" (side note, I feel like everyone in this game thought you were asking Ghost to vote in that post instead of saying you were suspecting someone). Talking about and scumreading people generally won't provoke useful reactions the way that bringing someone to L-2 would, and even individual votes can really bring in people's attention.
In addition, voting record and history is something that is easier to check in the later stages of the game. We will end up skimming ISOs looking for votes and the interactions around those, we will analyze the history and events around this game by looking at the vote counts from the mod and correlating them with game events and flips.
So, not choosing to vote is anti town because it is depriving us of a way to drive the game forward, whether it's forcing lurkers to participate more, or forcing scum to get anxious or panicky, or giving the rest of us insight into what reads you are committing to.
It can be scummy because by not joining the various wagons or committing to any other vote, you can skate by under the radar and not attract as much attention. You escape being asked to justify your votes and certainly escape a lot of later game scrutiny.
I think that your responses to and about me have shown that even my lone vote on you has had the desired effect of calling you into participating when you may have otherwise lurked.
With that said, I now contest your casting of my vote as "naked" because your lack of voting pinged me the entire time for the reasons above. I concede that the notion of not voting unless you're sure someone is scum is a common one among new players though and I did the same thing in my first forum mafia games (on a different, private forum), so I'll give that explanation some credence for now and ask that you change your practice from here on out.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Let's say that hypothetically there is enough time to form an alternate wagon. Who are you scumreading and why?In post 410, Snowblaze wrote:
I explained earlier:In post 409, gibus wrote:
Why though?In post 406, Snowblaze wrote:I definitely prefer lynching gibus to Hectic at this point. I feel like there's something that can be worked out from the speed at which both of these wagons were built up, but I'm not sure what it is, at least not yet.
Anyway, it's probably close enough to deadline that I should be doing this: VOTE: gibus, L-1.
I'm not sure why I'm being scumread right now.
Your ISO didn't give me enough to doubt that initial impression. I'm notIn post 343, Snowblaze wrote:
Well, other than the initial weak townlean you haven't really given me any reason to think you're town, and then what M2H and Nauci said about your read on Raya is making me suspicious. I'll need to read back through your ISO to get a solid read, though. Will do that now!In post 342, gibus wrote:
Why?In post 340, Snowblaze wrote: I'm starting to lean towards a possible scum!gibusconvinced, but I think you're more likely to be scum than Hectic right now, and there probably wouldn't be time for an alternate wagon.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Can you tell me what that post means because I couldn't decipher it and thought it was just another trolly oneIn post 407, gibus wrote:also gives me scum pings.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
If you're referring to the gibberish, that's not what I'm talking about
I mean the substance of that post
First, I just figured out like 20 minutes ago that he's talking about you when he says Busi, but I still don't know what he's talking about wrt your previous have and therefore don't understand the inferences than drawn from it. Can you tl;Dr that for me?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Okay so
On my first read of the game, I was somewhat confused by the constant trolling posts from Hectic (also, I feel like gimmicks are slightly more likely from scum to cover up meta differences), and really wasn't and to follow their reads and progression as I read along, so they were null and in my POE. Once I corrected my misunderstanding about Gibus's read on Elmo, I had him as less scummy and was about to vote Hectic, but then decided I didn't want to put him at L-1 just because of a lack of town read.
I have since gone and read Hectic's ISO again and, successfully skipping the trolling, I see more genuine town lines of thinking and trying to figure out the game and felt a lot better about him. I also reread Umlaut's ISO and I'm still not sure how I feel about the slot, but I somewhat bought his case on Hectic for a bit.
So then I'm still confused on the slot, so... I skimmed Hoctac's ISO from the game that Gibus linked, particularly looking for what gave scumbbus away to Hoctac (I didn't see much? Hundreds of posts fighting with Battle Mage before a rather sudden turn into Gibus and getting him lynched at the end of d1). Then I skimmed Gibus's ISO there to see what he's like as scum.
After all of that, I finally feel confident enough to decide that Gibus is the more likely to be scum among my PoE.
Among the reasons for that is that I was scum in 2004 with Gibus, where he was town reading me pretty much the whole time because I was absolutely exhausting myself with how hard I was trying to sound town. He outright said this game that he'd be more paranoid about me this time around. But... Instead of doing so, he continues his town read of Elmo and doesn't include me in his POE at all? I find the lack of paranoia and desire to lynch hectic while there's town momentum for it much more likely to come from Scum Gibus than Town Gibus. Also, there wasn't any especially deep or long-running chains of thought in his ISO that Scum Gibus would have trouble faking.
@Gibus, consider this my intent to hammer in approximately 10-12 hours from now.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
It's driving me crazy that she'd drop that "he's lying" and disappear immediatelyIn post 481, Hectic wrote:We're both at L-2. gibus is only at one 1 vote now.
Snowblaze made it sound like Umalut was lying by simply claiming an "investigative" role. Really need her to come back and confirm that her role doesn't work with Umlaut's claim.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
If Umlaut flips red I'm debating if this post clears Homura or if it is hesitation to bus, knowing they'd look bad otherwiseIn post 500, Homura wrote:To be honest, I’ve caught up a while ago and I really wanted Snow to respond before posting because it would confirm or deconfirm the theory I based most of my reads and my view of the game around, but I don’t think it’s affordable to wait now.
VOTE: Umlaut
Prefer going here. Snow’s semi-CC means this has a higher chance of nailing confscum than a Hectic lynch.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I think that if Homura wasn't active in other games at the time, then it would have been a clear because there's no reason to come out of lurking to switch things to Umlaut over the scenario where we'd be forced to vote Hectic
But seeing as how Hectic has already shown that he checks people's activity in other games, maybe she felt pressure to come back and do this?
That's still pretty fringe though and it's much more likely that she's town for that vote- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
It's not inactivity that we're reading though, it's the choice of activity which wouldn't be at all necessary if she and Umlaut are scum togetherIn post 515, Raya36 wrote:I wouldn't read too much into activity to be honest. Sometimes I disappear a whole day simply because I'm tired or not in the mood to play- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
If those 2 are the scum team why the f would they do this whole song and dance and hope enough people checked in today to mislynch you today instead of Gibus o_OIn post 514, Umlaut wrote:My final solve is {Hectic, Snowblaze}. Don't let anyone spin some story about how it's too obvious and scum wouldn't do that. It's only a bad play if they actually get lynched for it, so lynch them for it.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Actually I'm willing to bet that it means that the remaining scum is a scum PR and assumed that Snow would be protected by a jailer or a doctor and went with the town who is otherwise the most confirmed town plus scary to go up againstIn post 531, Raya36 wrote:Hello everyone.
Once I get a chance I'm going to look into Umlaut's associations and also Hectic's.
Interesting scum didn't kill Snow who is being considered a potential PR right now. Makes me wonder if Hectic was on to something.
Since they're solo scum now, I don't think they can perform their action AND the faction kill, so they wouldn't have been able to do anything to prevent a protection role from working- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
It would really super suck for M2H if he replaced into a scum slot and then had that turn of events happen which narrows the POE down to just like... 3 slots?
Snowblaze is obviously cleared, Raya36 is cleared for jumping ship in crunch time, Homura is cleared because there was absolutely no reason they couldn't have lurked out the rest of the day and forced Raya and I to switch to lynching Hectic, and I don't see how anyone can assume that I am scum when I had literally every opportunity to declare intent on Gibus and then hammer him immediately with only ~12 hours left on the clock instead of waiting until the next day to do so, and obviously we cannot both be scum.
That means scum has to be within Gibus, M2H, and Pi.
Of those 3, I still have a townlean on Pi, and would like to focus on the other 2 for now.
I cannot for the life of me figure out why Umlaut would claim when he did as scum. It would have made absolutely zero sense to do so as town, but as scum, it also doesn't make sense to me. He wasn't really in imminent danger of being lynched because even if Hectic defused the wagon on Gibus, he was still on the chopping block and if Umlaut did NOT claim, Hectic's lynch would still have been the more likely one, I think? I mean, the only other scenario I can think of is that Gibus was the scum PR, and Umlaut was trying to protect the scum PR? That also doesn't make sense to me because if Umlaut was lynched, then the scum PR wouldn't be able to do both their scum action and the faction kill except to do so on the same target (i.e. roleblock a jailer in order to prevent them from jailing in order to then kill the jailer?).
The only other possible explanation is that Umlaut legitimately thought that Hectic's last minute wagon would successfully go through in what little time remained, and honestly thought that claiming an investigative role would save him and hoped that town wouldn't be checking the thread in time to counter claim? Or that the lynch would go through either way, and he could at least draw out a town counter claim for his buddy to kill afterwards?
I honestly don't know. But Hectic flipping town and Umlaut flipping scum means Gibus isn't cleared.
Now it's a matter of figuring out whether Umlaut would have super hard town reads on his scum buddy or not, because he spent half of the day saying that Ghost/M2H is SUPER RIDICULOUSLY TOWN and that's making me all WIFOM.
Anyway, lynching 1 out of 2 scum on the first day with all town PR alive means we almost definitely win this one short of a scum miracle move.
VOTE: Gibus Let's start here while we wait for M2H's replacement.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Oh shit you're right about thatIn post 534, gibus wrote:Isn't M2H cleared? Wouldn't making a NK be considered as a response?
VOTE: Piisirrational
Huge oops from me - Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci