Right back at ya buddy!
VOTE: GuiltyLion
VOTE: ItalianoIn post 17, ItalianoVD wrote:Looks like we're playing together again pii. What's up bud.
Oh yeah
VOTE: Micc
As a golden gopher fan, I can't believe he's broadcasting that thing in his avatar.
What does it matter that he's an SE?In post 23, 72offsuit wrote:-0.25 points for wasting a vote by OMGUSing voting an SE who isn;t going to tell you squat from his reaction
Plus this is a huge discredit.In post 72, ItalianoVD wrote:So DoctorPepper and UNOwen voting for me on day one without explanation. Seems pretty convenient. You two just shot up my scum read list.
This is a bad post.In post 138, piisirrational wrote:Probably DoctorPepper. Don't like how they specifically wanted us to "leave RVS." Also don't like how they claim to have "solved the game" in post 25, and post 50 just seems pretty defensive in response to 72offsuit's post.
Was thinking me saying it felt like a huge discredit, which is scum agenda in and of itself
This is kind of a weird post. A lot of games in non newbie queues do these fake "unvote, oop I'm just kidding" thingIn post 147, 72offsuit wrote:What's the purpose of this unvote and re-vote?In post 66, TheThirteenthJT wrote:UNVOTE: doctorpepperIn post 55, DoctorPepper wrote:Yeah that's a wasted vote.
I don't think there is such a thing as a wasted vote when things can be so easily retracted. Let me rephrase that, I don't think there is anything such as a wasted vote this early in the game. No one is exempt until confirmed town.
VOTE: doctorpepper
Idk, I feel like this mentality comes more from town than scumIn post 177, ItalianoVD wrote:You know I realize I understand nothing in this game. I’ve tried to no avail.
VOTE: ItalianoVDL1
Anyone care to hammer?
VOTE: Walter
In post 392, ItalianoVD wrote:I guess we'll just have to take your word for it. Don't think it'll stop us voting for you though. I do find it interesting that TTJT is saying the same thing as you and you both took V/LA. I'm not questioning your rl issues. Sorry man I really hope you are able to work out your issues. But it's just interesting and even pii asked to be replaced. Sera never posted once. What is this game doing to people?In post 389, DoctorPepper wrote:I actually have no defense for my play today aside from just being at a bad time with real life.
Give me the weekend I'll have some time to read through
Don't treat this as Alignment Indicative. Tired DP would be tired and demotivated regardless if he was town or scum.In post 401, UNOwen wrote:Surely scumIn post 398, ItalianoVD wrote:I don't know, this last post here makes me feel uneasy about voting for DoctorPepper now. What is everyone else's thoughts about it? ScumIn post 395, DoctorPepper wrote: As irresponsible as this sounds, I'm not really super concerned with my lynch if town wants to make that mistakecouldsay it's a "mistake", but how likely?wouldsay it's a mistake, unless they were throwing in the towel completely. Could you explain what you mean by "how likely"?
Not a fan of 404 and it feels like its cherry picking.
I feel like this is a huge misrep because I actually care more about my scum games than town games.In post 420, GuiltyLion wrote:why do you assume the disinterest isn't indicative? I think most players, as town, have interest in lynching correctly and influencing the thread in the direction they want. I think scum are more likely not to want to rock the boat or do too much, and make safe/bland posts on entry. 72offsuit also made a meta argument that DoctorPepper is makes weaker posts as scum.In post 416, TheThirteenthJT wrote:He came back into the game with very weak posts, that is undeniable, but I dont necessary see it as scummy. I see it almost as a bit of disinterest.
VOTE: Guilty LionIn post 419, GuiltyLion wrote:I actually also thought those looked like softs from DoctorPepper.
Scumhunting was non existent because of inactivity, not being scum. JeezIn post 455, 72offsuit wrote:Your scumhunting is next to nonexistent. If you are town you only have yourself to blame.
Yeah, because I HAVENT FULLY READ THE GAME YET?In post 457, 72offsuit wrote: You think your wagon is scummotivated and yet you are voting walter?
Ok then.
In post 402, Ydrasse wrote:dp’s reply to me isn’t very indicative of anything. i think that a player that hasn’t kept up/been as engaged with a game as either alignment would say that.
why does it make you uneasy that he’s saying he’s not a good vote @italiano?
I initially didn't like his line of questioning from my RVS because they're flimsyIn post 364, GuiltyLion wrote:can you answer my 256In post 352, DoctorPepper wrote:Anyone care to explain TTJT as scum? I'm kinda town reading their posts because the UNOwen analysis makes sense to me
TBH I was generally disinterested so this game is a crap shoot. Town DP though is more unsure and less prone to tunneling because I really dislike playing as town.In post 385, Ydrasse wrote: I'd like to hear the why behind DP's thought processes rather than just seeing little pop-ups of "this is weird."
Do you think scum would be this brazen about jumping the wagon?In post 465, TheThirteenthJT wrote:Once more wagon hopping.In post 456, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I have also been busy and am not prone to long posts in general.
I think dp or jt is a scum bit I think doctorpepper is scummier rn.
Quite frankly, this whole my lynch will not affect town rubs me the wrong way.
Either he is a town pr or he is scum.
Mini is still neutral/slightscum to me.
VOTE: DoctorPepper
I'm sorry, but since when has "playing the game" automatically equate to town?In post 493, 72offsuit wrote:And then advocate for lynching myself or GL who have actually been playing the game.
1. Where is the AtE?In post 494, 72offsuit wrote:And your defensce is AtE and self meta-ing.
Hi pot, I'm kettle.In post 509, 72offsuit wrote:ACTIVE SE. Don;t take my post out of context.