Mini Normal 2149 | Philosophers | Over
Forum rules
- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Nice. So I can lightly TR you for your vote on Norwegian since I have played with him as Scum twice.In post 7, GuiltyLion wrote:this is our third game together, we've been both scum and both townI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Are you looking for an easy mislynch?
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
You don't say?In post 10, popopopopopopo wrote:supI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
My early TRs are usually legit, but I often second guess them later.In post 13, GuiltyLion wrote:
I think it's a little early to be TRing me just for that but I'll take itIn post 8, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Nice. So I can lightly TR you for your vote on Norwegian since I have played with him as Scum twice.In post 7, GuiltyLion wrote:this is our third game together, we've been both scum and both townI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
In post 16, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Early scumread on your slot already. I always vote my best buds when i’m scum to "fit in". You’re clearly trying to mask your deep affections for you with this deceivery and i shall not stand for it.
Don't like the SR on GL and don't like calling Truth Town based on the claim.In post 18, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Pleased to meet you. I’m going to just immediately assume you are town. After all, your name is truth. So it seems legit.In post 15, Truth wrote:I am a Miller Mason.
VOTE: Norwegian
Also @Truth, this is a game people lie a lot in. cuss words are not really something you can control.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
If you were being sarcastic, then it's NAI for you.In post 21, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Quick. This is vital for my read on your slot. Do you have trouble detecting sarcasm and jokeey posts with serious ones?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
You as a person.In post 24, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
What are you basing this knowledge on?In post 22, LicketyQuickety wrote:
If you were being sarcastic, then it's NAI for you.In post 21, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Quick. This is vital for my read on your slot. Do you have trouble detecting sarcasm and jokeey posts with serious ones?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I already stated my reasons. I said I have seen Norwegian as Scum twice. They are an easy read for me when they are Scum. I assume something similar with GL. It's a rough estimate, sure, but the game just started and I did say it was a light Town read.In post 27, Truth wrote:I do not understand LicketyQuickety's reason to townread GuiltyLion based on him voting for Norwegianboy. Norwegainboy was yet to post.
VOTE: LicketyQuickety
I would like you to elaborate on your reasons.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I'm smart.In post 29, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
But you have only seen my scum games up to now correct? How would you know sarcasm is NAI for me in that case?In post 26, LicketyQuickety wrote:
You as a person.In post 24, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
What are you basing this knowledge on?In post 22, LicketyQuickety wrote:
If you were being sarcastic, then it's NAI for you.In post 21, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Quick. This is vital for my read on your slot. Do you have trouble detecting sarcasm and jokeey posts with serious ones?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Yes, because it follows that in the early game you vote for pressure. I am ASSUMING that is what GL is doing here. I could be wrong on that, and it could actually be that GL is Scum and knows you are Town, now that I think about it. But you have given me what I want and I can lightly TR you now so...In post 31, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
...what? Truth was asking why you’d townread someone for voting a slot that had not yet posted anything.In post 28, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I already stated my reasons. I said I have seen Norwegian as Scum twice. They are an easy read for me when they are Scum. I assume something similar with GL. It's a rough estimate, sure, but the game just started and I did say it was a light Town read.In post 27, Truth wrote:I do not understand LicketyQuickety's reason to townread GuiltyLion based on him voting for Norwegianboy. Norwegainboy was yet to post.
VOTE: LicketyQuickety
I would like you to elaborate on your reasons.
UNVOTE:I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
VOTE: popoIn post 33, popopopopopopo wrote:
ok this works for meIn post 19, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Popopo. You will be my voting slave this game as payback for me having saved your ass in Large 227. Deal? Good.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
This is actually quite Scummy. Reason is as follows: There's no reason to say this. You can very well crumb who you are masons with without actually saying you are going to crumb. The reasons for why this is Scummy also is because Truth has already started compromising on their meta. I say this eluding to the fact that they will tolerate cuss words given some circumstance. Overall, that is enough for me to not trust the claim at least and not buy the gimmick that they do not lie. Once a compromise is established, it ruins the whole not lying thing. Which is why I started at baseline in pointing out that people lie in this game to Truth. What Truth seems to have done there is not confirm or deny said statement, which means there's really no reason for Truth to state they will be crumbing who they are masons with, hence, a contradiction and an inconsistent narrative.In post 40, Truth wrote:I will be crumbing my Mason buddies in the event that I die, but will be doing so stealthily, to make them hard to spot for the untrained eye. Please do not look too closely for crumbs or you are part of the mafia.
VOTE: Truth
Let me know if you understand this or not. Truth be told (heh) Truth has already shattered the narrative they set for themselves in their first posts of their existence, which leads me to believe that they are lying about being millar masons as well and this may as well be cover up for them being Scum and trying to tell the truth who they are Scum with.
All that said, I would totally lynch this slot in this instant given the above. I trust this will be met with heavy resistance from Scum and Town will not see the validity of what I am saying. I trust the judgement of those keen on reasoning and not just being non-thinking meat robots.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I feel totally validated ignoring this comment to kingdom come.In post 58, Nauci wrote:Oy Mavs, are you scum this time?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
This is not just a "usually" type of player. Their gimmick is that they tell the truth. They are betting on people buying they are telling the truth for as long as they can get away with it.In post 64, NorwegianboyEE wrote:As for Truth’s claim i don’t usually...I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Oh, you are trying to dialog with a SR. That's interesting. "shoot first ask questions later"?In post 70, Glitch wrote:Good evening folks,
What is that even supposed to mean, act as their representative?In post 15, Truth wrote:Interesting. I would like everyone to know I am a Miller Mason. I have buddies but I won't be revealing who they are at this time. For now, I will act as their representative.
Truth's immediate claim is kinda ballsy unless it's true. I feel 59 was just pushing back, why is it such a bad idea?osuka wrote:59 does not come from any town with an iq that has anywhere near 3 digits
Changing gears, 44 isn't the greatest comeback with the whole fake millers are all mafia argument (if I'm understanding that right). That would be such a huge downfall for the scum if they identified together and then one gets lynched and we find out who they are. Of course we would take the rest down. That just sounds like a terrible strategy I would never think the scum would use unless they were complete morons. So VOTE: LicketyQuickety because scum aren't stupid and we have to hunt smart.
Lick, what would your strategy be as scum? Fly under the radar? Big and bold to seem fearless of dying? Something else?
How about you evaluate people based on play and not claims.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
It's in my case against you, namely, you compromised on the cuss thing. Then you gave no mention at all about me saying people lie in this game unless what you said, "I see" in 23. So are you saying now that your gimmick isn't and has never been not to lie? If that's the case then why opped to tell everyone you are going to crumb your mason buddies? There's really no reason to do that unless you have the gimmick to only tell the truth, which at this point has been thoroughly ousted. Why wouldn't you now change your stance on lying given the former?In post 72, Truth wrote:
What gives you the reason to believe this? I have told you this isn't true. I'm not sure if you missed my post or are intentionally ignoring it.In post 68, LicketyQuickety wrote:
This is not just a "usually" type of player. Their gimmick is that they tell the truth. They are betting on people buying they are telling the truth for as long as they can get away with it.In post 64, NorwegianboyEE wrote:As for Truth’s claim i don’t usually...
Also, your OMGUS is ill founded given your initial reason for voting me has been dissed since I am actually being quite clear with my thought process. But you vote me SO THAT I will answer. But I did. So why do you continue to vote me?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Scum Read. And that explains why you don't buy my case, in part. Because you've only seen so much in F2F and not "whacky" and/or "gimmicks" in Forum Mafia.In post 75, Glitch wrote:Sorry I'm new to playing online, what's SR?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
In post 78, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Quick, if you are town i implore you to abandon this push. It’s quite a reach to assume someone is scum for claiming miller mason, and then suggesting they will only tell the truth when they’ve already stated their name has no bearing on behaviour.
No offense, but you are totally wrong here.In post 79, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Having a dialogue with your scumread is natural and has many benefits to town. Don’t like how you’re trying to portray it negatively here.In post 73, LicketyQuickety wrote:Oh, you are trying to dialog with a SR. That's interesting. "shoot first ask questions later"?
I really hate this white knite of Truth here. I've stated WHY I think they STARTED with a truth gimmick, namely, because they said they would crumb their mason buddies when there's not really a reason to do that unless you are 1) new OR 2) establishing a truth gimmick. The fact they know what a crumb is means the purpose for stating they would crumb is pointless, since it should be fairly apparent that they would do that regardless, hence, it's 2. Which means they have already broken character in favor of meeting their win con.
I would also point you to the last half of 44, which is an established pattern for me at this point in my Town play. Remember when I was tunneled on you and you were Scum? Yeah, think I am doing that here only to someone else.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
That's actually pretty par for the course for me. See siggy for details.In post 80, Glitch wrote:Yeah I have played for years face to face and have a lot of fun with it. That's how I've always played. If I suspect someone, I prod and ask questions to get answers and more to go on. You're the only one I see making an argument that doesn't make a lot of sense to me.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Except Scum won't kill a MILLAR claim. Duh. You're basically playing right into the claim's hands doing that. I think a millar claim deserves SERIOUS pressure and then you evaluate them on play. That's exactly what I am doing.In post 83, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You can argue i’m white knighting Quick, but i’m simply not keen on lynching a mason claim on day 1. And that’s final. Either mafia will kill a mason and confirm their existence or they will eventually need to claim.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
No, I am actually playing correctly given your millar claim.In post 85, Truth wrote:But I am confirmable by my partners. I am new to this site but have played mafia on others before. One of my partners suggested I crumb to thread. I haven't had a chance to make any yet because of all the attention and scrutiny you are putting me under.
The same partner is telling me to ignore you but I think you are acting like mafia.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
The average IQ on this site is almost definitely above 100.In post 87, osuka wrote:
i suppose you have a pointIn post 65, popopopopopopo wrote:
what do you think the average iq for players on this site isIn post 62, osuka wrote:59 does not come from any town with an iq that has anywhere near 3 digitsI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Given this ^ it's a hood and not actually masons.In post 15, Truth wrote:I have buddiesI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
He's actually defending you there...In post 95, Truth wrote:
That is exactly my point. You are calling me out and shading me while not advocating my lynch. This looks like a mafia play to me. If people agree with you and start voting me, I expect you will then be fine with my lynch, but right now, you are not pushing it because it may make you look like mafia if not enough people get behind it.In post 90, osuka wrote:
that's just not true at all. i'm calling your stupid plays out as what they are: stupid plays. I'm not advocating for anyone's lynch and if you legitimately believe that, youre delusionalIn post 74, Truth wrote:In post 61, osuka wrote:i'm starting to have serious doubts that you're mason
I will ignore your insult and point out the obvious: You are shading me without advocating my lynch. You are testing the waters to see if others are open to pushing me, in which case you would join. That is what it looks like to me.In post 62, osuka wrote:59 does not come from any town with an iq that has anywhere near 3 digitsI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
That's a misrep of my case on you.In post 97, Truth wrote:LicketyQuickety surely doesn't believe his conspiracy theory of me being mafia trying to tell the truth. Is he making it up on the spot in an attempt to look like town?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I kinda just don't want to "wait and see" since I think my case is pretty legit actually. No one is going to come in here and claim that it's just a hood and not masons, which honestly worries me given the claim.In post 100, popopopopopopo wrote:
can you at least accept that if he is lying about his role it will become apparent when no one claims mason with himIn post 81, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 78, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Quick, if you are town i implore you to abandon this push. It’s quite a reach to assume someone is scum for claiming miller mason, and then suggesting they will only tell the truth when they’ve already stated their name has no bearing on behaviour.
No offense, but you are totally wrong here.In post 79, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Having a dialogue with your scumread is natural and has many benefits to town. Don’t like how you’re trying to portray it negatively here.In post 73, LicketyQuickety wrote:Oh, you are trying to dialog with a SR. That's interesting. "shoot first ask questions later"?
I really hate this white knite of Truth here. I've stated WHY I think they STARTED with a truth gimmick, namely, because they said they would crumb their mason buddies when there's not really a reason to do that unless you are 1) new OR 2) establishing a truth gimmick. The fact they know what a crumb is means the purpose for stating they would crumb is pointless, since it should be fairly apparent that they would do that regardless, hence, it's 2. Which means they have already broken character in favor of meeting their win con.
I would also point you to the last half of 44, which is an established pattern for me at this point in my Town play. Remember when I was tunneled on you and you were Scum? Yeah, think I am doing that here only to someone else.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Yes, I agree with this. Not until we get a couple flips at least.In post 106, popopopopopopo wrote:still, i dont think outing the hood, masons or not, is a good idea.
Still, I think my case is decent. Your stance on my case is somewhat nuanced as well as Osuka, so that is a good look for both of you.
GL's silence is concerning me. I don't know if they are just busy or lurking at this point. Neither would surprise me. They are either Town for pressuring Norwegian, or Scum knowing Norwegian is Town.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Why? Don't you think that muddies the waters beyond reason?In post 110, Truth wrote:Either way, I am going to use the plural form.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
There is nothing wrong with that at all actually. Just that it makes your play more complicated given you said it was masons when it wasn't. This could just be based on ignorance, but then again not because you claimed millar. Which means you knew on some level that your hood (never heard of a millar mason before) could be made of Town AND Scum. If that's the case, then perhaps outing the hood would be a good idea given if you really are millar there is likely one Scum in the hood. I can see a 3 person hood with one millar and one Scum and another just Town. That's actually not far from where I see things heading with hoods given mods have tended to use them so much. I could also buy that you are just Scum, thought the hood was actually a masonry, and claimed millar as a kind of "oops" that you couldn't have known how hoods work.In post 110, Truth wrote:why is it a bad idea to out if I'm just in a neighbourhood?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
No one is going to claim they are masons with you unless they are, except they would never do that. If it's a hood someone MIGHT do that, but again, that would just mean that they are actually in your hood. What Town incentive is there to lie about being in a hood/mason with you?In post 116, Truth wrote:I may or may not be in a neighbourhood. I am open to someone claiming neighbours with me which I will play along with. Of course, it might also be my real neighbour if I am in a neighbourhood. This would be the Wifom element at play, and should make it difficult for mafia to decide whether I am a Mason or a neighbour.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Truth has all but admitted it's a hood. It's a hood until proven otherwise.In post 131, NorwegianboyEE wrote:More than 2 masons in a mini setup sounds implausible. A hood would be more likely for that.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I don't think there is a rule that you can't claim within 7 pages...In post 144, Looker wrote:Do you feel we have a legitimate claim 7 pages in?
What do YOU think about the claim? Do you believe they are millar?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
There's one problem with this...In post 147, mavsfan41 wrote:So I haven’t fully finished the read but wanted to comment about LicketyQuickety going after the miller/mason claim. In 84, you mention the two possibilities for going after Truth’s claim. I would argue it’s #1 and he’s new vs #2. Post 52 should tell you that. Truth saying he has his mason buddies coming forward to verify his claim, that would look horrible coming from scum. If scum!Truth is fake claiming miller/mason then his buddies would be scum. To 1) be scum and suggest his partners will verify his claim is one helluva gambit if ANYONE of them were to be lynched, you could easily link them together 2) to not know how that would sound saying he has buddies coming forward with players being skeptical of his claim and not being aware of the optics of this. This tells me that he hasn’t even considered how scummy it would be to say “hey guys. I have a private chat and will show guilty to a cop’s investigation, but don’t worry cause I’ve got people in that private chat to verify I’m town.” That sounds scummy af and Truth seems to just not have even considered the optics. Basically his 52 reads to me like someone being like I’m confirmed town cause my buddies will back me up without even considering scum could make the same exact claim with scum buddies backing that fake claim up. As of right now, I hafta accept his claim here (at least for now).
In hoods, it's extremely common for there to be at least one Scum in the hood. That's pretty par for the course.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Yeah, I said it was common, not a hard and fast rule. But I think you are kinda neglecting the general rule that most of the time hoods have at least one Scum in them. That actually seems to be the baseline for hood. Given that, ofc there are going to be adaptations from that. That doesn't make the general rule go away, however.In post 178, popopopopopopo wrote:
we just played in a game with a 3 town hoodIn post 177, LicketyQuickety wrote:
There's one problem with this...In post 147, mavsfan41 wrote:So I haven’t fully finished the read but wanted to comment about LicketyQuickety going after the miller/mason claim. In 84, you mention the two possibilities for going after Truth’s claim. I would argue it’s #1 and he’s new vs #2. Post 52 should tell you that. Truth saying he has his mason buddies coming forward to verify his claim, that would look horrible coming from scum. If scum!Truth is fake claiming miller/mason then his buddies would be scum. To 1) be scum and suggest his partners will verify his claim is one helluva gambit if ANYONE of them were to be lynched, you could easily link them together 2) to not know how that would sound saying he has buddies coming forward with players being skeptical of his claim and not being aware of the optics of this. This tells me that he hasn’t even considered how scummy it would be to say “hey guys. I have a private chat and will show guilty to a cop’s investigation, but don’t worry cause I’ve got people in that private chat to verify I’m town.” That sounds scummy af and Truth seems to just not have even considered the optics. Basically his 52 reads to me like someone being like I’m confirmed town cause my buddies will back me up without even considering scum could make the same exact claim with scum buddies backing that fake claim up. As of right now, I hafta accept his claim here (at least for now).
In hoods, it's extremely common for there to be at least one Scum in the hood. That's pretty par for the course.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
There is some truth to the fact Truth is new. That much is clear. It's just a question of how much do they actually know that's the problem. Claiming millar D1 is the correct play, so as far as that goes, if he IS millar, he made the right play. However, that would demonstrate a bit of familiarity with site meta, which would mean he isn't new. That would complicate things immensely. Still, the "right play" is to pressure the millar claim and evaluate them based on play and not just the claim.In post 181, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If Truth is actually an neighbor and lied about being mason then i would get really suspicious of them just saying.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I kinda don't like this post.In post 144, Looker wrote:In post 19, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Popopo. You will be my voting slaveSpoiler:
Do you feel we have a legitimate claim 7 pages in?In post 132, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Truth has all but admitted it's a hood. It's a hood until proven otherwise.In post 131, NorwegianboyEE wrote:More than 2 masons in a mini setup sounds implausible. A hood would be more likely for that.
Why are you trying to avoid RVS?In post 140, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Do you think Truth is telling the truth about his role?
VOTE: LicketyQuickety Consider it a reward for your...effort
-Apathy
-laziness
-voting for no reason
Don't like anything about this post actually.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
This is kinda Scummy.In post 189, osuka wrote:
omegalul what planet do you live on? NL is almost universally bad unless you're in myloIn post 185, Truth wrote:Could I suggest we move on from this discussion for now and pretend it didn't happen?
As for the arguments to not no lynch, my thinking was that people usually no lynch on even numbers because it makes no difference in the number of lynches left and gives our roles more information. Since we will likely go to even numbers at some point this game due to a doctor saving me or my buddies, why not no lynch on the first day?
you're literally going to give me an aneurysm if you keep talking about the game, you, and your buddies the way you are. it's giving me an almost unbearable urge to put my head through the wall
there's also zero guarantee that there is only one killing role. that means no vig, no neutral-aligned killer, and no multiball (though this last one is pretty unlikely)
It seems OTT.
It also seems like you are not doing anything at all except complaining about how bad Truth is playing. I haven't really seen you do any Scum hunting. Your completely focussed on the claim and nothing else. Don't like this look from you. If you are as smart as you think you are, you would just ignore Truth and hunt elsewhere.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Over the top.In post 192, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Now i’m gonna sound like a noob, but what’s OTT?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I've pushed like 3-4 people besides you. Given I was the first person to question your claim, I would sorta hope that you would have picked up on that.In post 194, Truth wrote:Well, does anyone have any strong feelings of mafia from any other players? I would be fine with lynching but it doesn't seem like anyone has any leads.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
GL, Lucky, Osuka. Are you even reading or what?In post 197, Truth wrote:
Who are these 3-4?In post 195, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I've pushed like 3-4 people besides you. Given I was the first person to question your claim, I would sorta hope that you would have picked up on that.In post 194, Truth wrote:Well, does anyone have any strong feelings of mafia from any other players? I would be fine with lynching but it doesn't seem like anyone has any leads.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
EBWOPIn post 198, LicketyQuickety wrote:
GL, Looker, Osuka. Are you even reading or what?In post 197, Truth wrote:
Who are these 3-4?In post 195, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I've pushed like 3-4 people besides you. Given I was the first person to question your claim, I would sorta hope that you would have picked up on that.In post 194, Truth wrote:Well, does anyone have any strong feelings of mafia from any other players? I would be fine with lynching but it doesn't seem like anyone has any leads.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
How could you possibly have missed that? It's on the same page you said people were too focussed on your claim that I pointed out Osuka is too focussed on your claim. How exactly DID you miss that?In post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: OsukaI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I didn't call it a push.In post 204, osuka wrote:
he actually can be forgiven for missing your "push" because honestly I'm staggered that you dared call it a push in the first placeLicketyQuickety wrote:
How could you possibly have missed that? It's on the same page you said people were too focussed on your claim that I pointed out Osuka is too focussed on your claim. How exactly DID you miss that?In post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: OsukaI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I'd love for you to push me as Scum at this point. It would actually make you look pretty bad considering I have a few votes on me for really no reason so this could just be an excuse to push "next to top Scummyness".In post 209, osuka wrote:so to recap:
1. game-unrelated miscellaneous comment on my ad hominem;
2. interaction with a different slot altogether pointing out that their push on me is not, in your view, based on an accurate interpretation of my post;
3. pointing out that you think my post it "kinda scummy"
4. claiming that you pushed me
Plus, you've misrepped my read on you. I said you were wasting time, not actually pushing the claim.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
And let me emphasize something:In post 211, osuka wrote:let me emphasize this just so there's literally no question on anyone's mind
So you think you have done more than me or are you just OMGUSing me pure and straight up?In post 211, osuka wrote:theres really not that much content from other players, but i'm taking notes here and i just don't have a lot to go off of in terms of a good scumread.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Then shut it. I've already helped work out the claim more than you, I've pushed stuff more than you, I've Scum hunted more than you, I've gamesolved more than you. You have no more reasons to hide behind your OMGUS.In post 219, osuka wrote:
noIn post 217, LicketyQuickety wrote:
And let me emphasize something:In post 211, osuka wrote:let me emphasize this just so there's literally no question on anyone's mind
So you think you have done more than me or are you just OMGUSing me pure and straight up?In post 211, osuka wrote:theres really not that much content from other players, but i'm taking notes here and i just don't have a lot to go off of in terms of a good scumread.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Pot/kettleIn post 214, osuka wrote:VOTE: lq
this is the most stunning display of self-contradiction and sheer lack of sense that i've seen in a long time
You want to PL me when we have a millar claim that you think is retarded. Yeah, you can take your read on me to the grave. There was nothing wrong with my push on you. What I said was actually true. Somehow you want to twist that into something it's not. Is there something wrong with me pressuring you for you wasting Town's time with all your incessant complaining?
Go ahead, give me a reason why you think I am Scum. I'll wait.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
You realize you holding this position makes you look really bad if Truth flips Scum, right? Like, you have a bad case of a double standard here. On the one hand, you say Truth is stupid, but for some reason you feel content to otherwise leave the slot alone in terms of actually giving a Town/Scum read on that slot. On the other hand, you want to PL me because... why, exactly? Because I pushed you for your non-committal, complaining that doesn't help solve the game at ALL? No one can see your notes, bro. Why do you expect us to just believe you are Town here. But far be it from anyone else to push you. Oh no, can't have that, can we?In post 226, osuka wrote:
He’s just really dense and he doesn’t like how I talk, I take itIn post 224, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:In post 194, Truth wrote:Well, does anyone have any strong feelings of mafia from any other players? I would be fine with lynching but it doesn't seem like anyone has any leads.
What made you start suspecting osukaIn post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: Osuka
So your stance on Truth is Scummy since you haven't actually said anything about that slot in terms of Scum/Town except to say they are incompetent - meanwhile, me, who is trying their hardest to sort the claim while providing other takes on the game as well you want to PL for having one stance you disagree with, namely, a push on you for doing nothing but complaining? Yeah, inconsistent isn't the half of it.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I haven't backpedaled shit, bro. Where do you think I backpedaled? I never did that.In post 229, osuka wrote:
you didn't push me but you clearly claimed to have done so, and then backpedalled 2 posts later. that'sIn post 228, LicketyQuickety wrote:
You realize you holding this position makes you look really bad if Truth flips Scum, right? Like, you have a bad case of a double standard here. On the one hand, you say Truth is stupid, but for some reason you feel content to otherwise leave the slot alone in terms of actually giving a Town/Scum read on that slot. On the other hand, you want to PL me because... why, exactly? Because I pushed you for your non-committal, complaining that doesn't help solve the game at ALL? No one can see your notes, bro. Why do you expect us to just believe you are Town here. But far be it from anyone else to push you. Oh no, can't have that, can we?In post 226, osuka wrote:
He’s just really dense and he doesn’t like how I talk, I take itIn post 224, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:In post 194, Truth wrote:Well, does anyone have any strong feelings of mafia from any other players? I would be fine with lynching but it doesn't seem like anyone has any leads.
What made you start suspecting osukaIn post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: Osuka
So your stance on Truth is Scummy since you haven't actually said anything about that slot in terms of Scum/Town except to say they are incompetent - meanwhile, me, who is trying their hardest to sort the claim while providing other takes on the game as well you want to PL for having one stance you disagree with, namely, a push on you for doing nothing but complaining? Yeah, inconsistent isn't the half of it.reallyweird.
i never said truth isn't scummy and in fact i would very much consider a lynch on that slot, but i'd much rather push you right now (that's what I'm doing) and i can do that regardless of what i think about truth.
nice misrep though
Oh, and you should probably now give your definition of what you think a contradiction is.
Why would you rather push me than Truth? You haven't ever pushed Truth. So why exactly are you choosing to push me over Truth right now? Do you think I am an easier read than Truth? Is that why you prefer pushing me over Truth? Or maybe you don't like the thought I have actually given for Truth and think maybe if you push me it will distract me from looking at Truth.
There's no practical reason why you would rather push me over truth. Plus, you went from wanting to PL me and thinking it's better I am out of the game to now just making it out to be a push? Excuse me, you said I was contradicting myself? How about you look in the mirror?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Well, then Osuka needs to learn how to read.In post 231, ofrhz wrote:
Osuka thinks this post by you was a backpedal because you said you were pushing him earlier in 195In post 208, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I didn't call it a push.In post 204, osuka wrote:
he actually can be forgiven for missing your "push" because honestly I'm staggered that you dared call it a push in the first placeLicketyQuickety wrote:
How could you possibly have missed that? It's on the same page you said people were too focussed on your claim that I pointed out Osuka is too focussed on your claim. How exactly DID you miss that?In post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: OsukaI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
What would you call it besides a push? I did say it was a push, but the fact that you focus on my wording instead of my actions tells a whole lot more about you then me. It was pretty clear that I put pressure on you. call it a push, call it pressure, call it Scum hunting, doesn't really matter what you call it. It's pretty clear you keep majoring on the minors. First it was my word choice, now it's something about how you personally categorize stuff, meanwhile, you HAVEN'T actually put any pressure, pushed, Scum hunted really anyone in this game at all except me based on a technicality that is beyond weak. For lack of a better term, it's a bad push.In post 204, osuka wrote:
he actually can be forgiven for missing your "push" because honestly I'm staggered that you dared call it a push in the first placeLicketyQuickety wrote:
How could you possibly have missed that? It's on the same page you said people were too focussed on your claim that I pointed out Osuka is too focussed on your claim. How exactly DID you miss that?In post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: Osuka
VOTE: Osuka
For the contradiction of pushing me and not Truth.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I've never "melted down" as Scum. Why? Because I play strategically as Scum. I'm actually a lot better at Scum, but I prefer to play as Town.In post 246, osuka wrote:
and there it is, the classic scum meltdown into omgusIn post 235, LicketyQuickety wrote:
What would you call it besides a push? I did say it was a push, but the fact that you focus on my wording instead of my actions tells a whole lot more about you then me. It was pretty clear that I put pressure on you. call it a push, call it pressure, call it Scum hunting, doesn't really matter what you call it. It's pretty clear you keep majoring on the minors. First it was my word choice, now it's something about how you personally categorize stuff, meanwhile, you HAVEN'T actually put any pressure, pushed, Scum hunted really anyone in this game at all except me based on a technicality that is beyond weak. For lack of a better term, it's a bad push.In post 204, osuka wrote:
he actually can be forgiven for missing your "push" because honestly I'm staggered that you dared call it a push in the first placeLicketyQuickety wrote:
How could you possibly have missed that? It's on the same page you said people were too focussed on your claim that I pointed out Osuka is too focussed on your claim. How exactly DID you miss that?In post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: Osuka
VOTE: Osuka
For the contradiction of pushing me and not Truth.
there's a lot to unpack here. in order: you didn't even cast shade on me. You literally just said "this post is kinda scummy and over the top" and proceeded to do ~literally fucking nothing~ about it, other than using it as leverage to defend yourself vs truth's own pseudo-push.
"the minors" are where people who are at least halfway competent slip in this game. the way you say things often reveals much more than the things you're actually saying (or omitting). Even if completely ignoring the fact that I actually did exactly what you suggested in 191 (i.e., pushed someone else - just happened to be you), i find it very difficult to believe that the sequence in 195-198-201-202 topped off by 208 comes from town
you got overly defensive way too quick and tried to spin the situation as if i was the offending party, when in fact you very directly contradicted yourself after making a very noncommittal poke at me to use it elsewhere in the game, then flipping right back to whatever version of it was most convenient for you at the time
I explained like a million times why I thought that post was Scummy and it had a larger connotation to the rest of your play as a whole rather than just that one post.
Why would I abandon my GL vote at that point in the game when GL hadn't returned yet? I voted you for pushing minor things that are NAI. For starters, defensiveness is NOT a Scum tell. I have said that so many times it's kinds dumb tbh.
I still don't like you complaining. That seems to be a personal problem, however. Maybe you want to fix that at some point? Your post I attacked you on WAS OTT. It's pretty clear that Truth saw that as well. Like I said, the ONLY reason I didn't vote you right then and there is because I didn't want to take my vote off GL, who I am thinking of going back to so my vote actually means something.
"i find it very difficult to believe that the sequence in 195-198-201-202 topped off by 208 comes from town" Why? Is this your "expert Scum hunting"? I'm Town, good luck lynching me if I make it past D1.
It's kinda bull shit that I tell you to to actually do something, anything and you end up pushing me for that. Like, does that really make any sense? I tell you to execute your own agency and you take it out on the people who suggested it? You world is kinda revolved around complaining and bitterness, isn't it?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
You're going to have to link that.In post 250, Nauci wrote:
Just chiming in to say that Osuka definitely does this as town so it's probably NAIIn post 191, LicketyQuickety wrote:
This is kinda Scummy.In post 189, osuka wrote:
omegalul what planet do you live on? NL is almost universally bad unless you're in myloIn post 185, Truth wrote:Could I suggest we move on from this discussion for now and pretend it didn't happen?
As for the arguments to not no lynch, my thinking was that people usually no lynch on even numbers because it makes no difference in the number of lynches left and gives our roles more information. Since we will likely go to even numbers at some point this game due to a doctor saving me or my buddies, why not no lynch on the first day?
you're literally going to give me an aneurysm if you keep talking about the game, you, and your buddies the way you are. it's giving me an almost unbearable urge to put my head through the wall
there's also zero guarantee that there is only one killing role. that means no vig, no neutral-aligned killer, and no multiball (though this last one is pretty unlikely)
It seems OTT.
It also seems like you are not doing anything at all except complaining about how bad Truth is playing. I haven't really seen you do any Scum hunting. Your completely focussed on the claim and nothing else. Don't like this look from you. If you are as smart as you think you are, you would just ignore Truth and hunt elsewhere.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I'll wait for her to answer.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Don't care about this until you link where osuka has been OTT.In post 258, Nauci wrote:
You know how I kept trying to explain to people in our last game that your viewpoints make perfect sense to you in your head, but you're not able to get them out fully in your posts so that people are misinterpreting you or don't understand you frequently? You know how you wish that people would be more intellectually charitable to you about your points?In post 228, LicketyQuickety wrote:
You realize you holding this position makes you look really bad if Truth flips Scum, right? Like, you have a bad case of a double standard here. On the one hand, you say Truth is stupid, but for some reason you feel content to otherwise leave the slot alone in terms of actually giving a Town/Scum read on that slot. On the other hand, you want to PL me because... why, exactly? Because I pushed you for your non-committal, complaining that doesn't help solve the game at ALL? No one can see your notes, bro. Why do you expect us to just believe you are Town here. But far be it from anyone else to push you. Oh no, can't have that, can we?In post 226, osuka wrote:
He’s just really dense and he doesn’t like how I talk, I take itIn post 224, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:In post 194, Truth wrote:Well, does anyone have any strong feelings of mafia from any other players? I would be fine with lynching but it doesn't seem like anyone has any leads.
What made you start suspecting osukaIn post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: Osuka
So your stance on Truth is Scummy since you haven't actually said anything about that slot in terms of Scum/Town except to say they are incompetent - meanwhile, me, who is trying their hardest to sort the claim while providing other takes on the game as well you want to PL for having one stance you disagree with, namely, a push on you for doing nothing but complaining? Yeah, inconsistent isn't the half of it.
Why don't you apply that to how you read osuka's posts. Osuka's narrative makes sense from their perspective based on how he has read your posts. You fully contradicted yourself within 5 posts of saying you pushed osuka, and are now completely misconstruing what they're saying. You have extremely high confidence in your opinions even though most players won't agree with your premises or your conclusions and it makes your posting frequently anti-town. This isn't the first or last time people have talked about policy-lynching you and it's not happening repeatedly because every single one of these players is completely insane in the same way. Take a breather and re-evaluate the last 2 pages with more intellectual charity in mind.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Okay, well I skimmed their ISO there and I saw him be just as prickly but I didn't see anything I would consider OTT.In post 262, Nauci wrote:That is, in fact, what I was referring to. Specifically, day 2 of that game.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
This is what I am talking about specifically.In post 189, osuka wrote:you're literally going to give me an aneurysm if you keep talking about the game, you, and your buddies the way you are. it's giving me an almost unbearable urge to put my head through the wallI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em. - LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety