aite y'all which of you are voteless
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
hi nEE!
~Deimos
aite y'all which of you are voteless
I think it's a little early to be TRing me just for that but I'll take itIn post 8, LicketyQuickety wrote:Nice. So I can lightly TR you for your vote on Norwegian since I have played with him as Scum twice.In post 7, GuiltyLion wrote:this is our third game together, we've been both scum and both town
weren't you just chastising Quick not 4 hours ago for pushing me for weak 'activity' reasons?In post 172, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GuiltyLion, can you please come in and obvtown it up soon. Your RVS entrance coupled with disappearing hasn’t exactly filled me to the brin with confidence regarding your slot.
I feel like this is a disproportionate response to newbies doing newbie shitIn post 189, osuka wrote:you're literally going to give me an aneurysm if you keep talking about the game, you, and your buddies the way you are. it's giving me an almost unbearable urge to put my head through the wall
spent elsewhere, but it's here to stay now!In post 222, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Where's that early game energy Guilty?
In post 240, osuka wrote:I don't know what fucking planet you're living on, but if 210 doesn't very directly contradict 195+198 then I don't know what the fuck to tell you
In post 246, osuka wrote:and there it is, the classic scum meltdown into omgusIn post 235, LicketyQuickety wrote:What would you call it besides a push? I did say it was a push, but the fact that you focus on my wording instead of my actions tells a whole lot more about you then me. It was pretty clear that I put pressure on you. call it a push, call it pressure, call it Scum hunting, doesn't really matter what you call it. It's pretty clear you keep majoring on the minors. First it was my word choice, now it's something about how you personally categorize stuff, meanwhile, you HAVEN'T actually put any pressure, pushed, Scum hunted really anyone in this game at all except me based on a technicality that is beyond weak. For lack of a better term, it's a bad push.In post 204, osuka wrote:he actually can be forgiven for missing your "push" because honestly I'm staggered that you dared call it a push in the first placeLicketyQuickety wrote:How could you possibly have missed that? It's on the same page you said people were too focussed on your claim that I pointed out Osuka is too focussed on your claim. How exactly DID you miss that?In post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: Osuka
VOTE: Osuka
For the contradiction of pushing me and not Truth.
there's a lot to unpack here. in order: you didn't even cast shade on me. You literally just said "this post is kinda scummy and over the top" and proceeded to do ~literally fucking nothing~ about it, other than using it as leverage to defend yourself vs truth's own pseudo-push.
"the minors" are where people who are at least halfway competent slip in this game. the way you say things often reveals much more than the things you're actually saying (or omitting). Even if completely ignoring the fact that I actually did exactly what you suggested in 191 (i.e., pushed someone else - just happened to be you), i find it very difficult to believe that the sequence in 195-198-201-202 topped off by 208 comes from town
you got overly defensive way too quick and tried to spin the situation as if i was the offending party, when in fact you very directly contradicted yourself after making a very noncommittal poke at me to use it elsewhere in the game, then flipping right back to whatever version of it was most convenient for you at the time
are you thinking of Candy Shop? I don't remember Truth saying they played elsewhereIn post 294, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Truth said they play elsewhere so I don't think they're new
eh okay given Nauci's meta defense of osuka I suspect the performative thing is NAIIn post 266, Nauci wrote:Just to be clear for everyone else, the "nothing OTT" game that Quick purportedly just skimmed involved Osuka and Formerfish going so completely over the top with mocking 2 players' posts (and themselves) that 7/9 players in the game replaced out then and there, and at least 1 sitewide ban was given.In post 264, LicketyQuickety wrote:I didn't see anything I would consider OTT.
First two lines feel like scum tryna just like... comment on the game, and then I don't like the way he hedges throughout - "inclined to believe" feels like awkward scum-writing-about-their-fake-thoughts rather than just actually having them.In post 64, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Man i’m loving the vibes i’m getting from this game already.In post 61, osuka wrote:i'm starting to have serious doubts that you're mason
This should be entertaining.
As for Truth’s claim i don’t usually see scum planning to make a miller mason claim within very short time of game start, so unless this is some next level WIFOM play by scum i’m inclined to believe the slot for now. Even if i think some of their posts have been a bit awkward.
"I implore you to abandon this push"? Norway I don't remember you ever speaking so awkwardly formally like this in our games together?In post 78, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Quick, if you are town i implore you to abandon this push. It’s quite a reach to assume someone is scum for claiming miller mason, and then suggesting they will only tell the truth when they’ve already stated their name has no bearing on behaviour.
Shade but no vote or further pressure. It's not clear to me what Norway's read on Quick really is - he constantly talks to him as if he townreads him but then what's the point of a post like this?In post 79, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Having a dialogue with your scumread is natural and has many benefits to town. Don’t like how you’re trying to portray it negatively here.In post 73, LicketyQuickety wrote:Oh, you are trying to dialog with a SR. That's interesting. "shoot first ask questions later"?
This vibes to me like a mafia response to someone advocating for No Lynch - contrast how others helpfully at least gave some reasoning for why no lynch is bad, this is just LAMIST.In post 158, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Please no. Stop arguing for no lynch.
I can’t take having to explain why it’s a dumb idea.
scumdar firing hard on the awkward "(Assuming you are town.)"In post 168, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If you are no lynching you are basically throwing the game and wasting your slot and town’s chance to win. (Assuming you are town.)
In post 130, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It’s been 8 hours and you’re voting GL based on inactivity?
In post 172, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GuiltyLion, can you please come in and obvtown it up soon. Your RVS entrance coupled with disappearing hasn’t exactly filled me to the brin with confidence regarding your slot.
really, cause he "seems scum" from seeing him as Town recently to me!In post 305, LicketyQuickety wrote:P-edit: GL's tunnel on Norwegian seems ill founded. Norwegian seems Town from seeing them as Scum twice recently. This looks to be a pretty easy push on Norwegian, who IS actually questioning things and Scum hunting. Might not look like much, but it's way less of an agenda based play than I am used to seeing from Noway!Scum. It also gives GL the excuse to keep his vote where it is.
eh you know at the time I thought Nauci shade was likely to be a genuine against the grain town scumread and his mechanics talk felt pure, but rereading his ISO altogether holistically and reconsidering they're not really great reasonsIn post 321, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Why are you townreading popo? I don't have a read there
no thoughts on... literally everything else I've posted?In post 332, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This is like classic scum meta of GL. He’s literally unable to play well as scum, so he starts his reappearance with the most lame shade i have ever seen on my slot.
this also feels exaggerated, for the recordIn post 332, NorwegianboyEE wrote:he starts his reappearance with the most lame shade i have ever seen on my slot.
"crumbing" that you would take a stance?In post 349, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Take a look at post 16 for me crumbing that i would take this stance.In post 347, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GL's first post actually pinged me hard, but i held back on commenting it until i'd seen what he would be up to. Since i've clearly seen his bad intentions by now there's no point concealing it.
Making a "RVS" vote like that on a random familiar slot and then leaving without doing any solving is an archtypical scum entrance i've seen a couple times by this point. Especially on my home forum. I can't explain it well. But if GL flips scum i'm going to celebrate my ability to see right through shit like that.
for somebody who "doesn't feel pressure" you sure felt the need to ramp up your activity and argue with every pointIn post 344, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't feel pressure from a case on me that's as bad as GuiltyLion's.In post 322, Truth wrote:I like GuiltyLion's case and may follow him for a while. Let's vote the person so he feels more pressure when he comes back and then has to respond while being a little self-conscious.
bruh it's early D1 I'm not trying to hang you for 'scum motivation' when you haven't evenIn post 358, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You answer my questions about what my supposed scum motivation for everything is.
here's what's worth responding toIn post 353, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You seemed so sure of your read on me, then you're casually suggesting you could switch to some easier mislynch.
no actually I would have found that far townier than what you did!In post 362, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I suppose if i were to ignore your huge chunk of nitpicking you would call that scummy as well?
but you said Glitch is a mislynch, which suggests you think he's town. Why do you think that?In post 364, NorwegianboyEE wrote:No. It's expressing suspicion at your attempt to switch focus from me to Glitch when you've already cased me with a long post.
and that's not what you did in our last game togetherIn post 367, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Because i read you as scum and therefore i view all your interactions with extreme prejudice.
you know what I'm going to just wreck this one post in particular and then let you know that I could do this with literally every post of yours if I wanted and I am not doing so only out of interest of keeping the game readable for others and because I'm a generous manIn post 347, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GL's first post actually pinged me hard, but i held back on commenting it until i'd seen what he would be up to. Since i've clearly seen his bad intentions by now there's no point concealing it.
Making a "RVS" vote like that on a random familiar slot and then leaving without doing any solving is an archtypical scum entrance i've seen a couple times by this point. Especially on my home forum. I can't explain it well. But if GL flips scum i'm going to celebrate my ability to see right through shit like that.
In post 369, GuiltyLion wrote:Anyways, let's talk about Glitch. Why did you say he's a mislynch?
you didn't really, you basically said Glitch is a mislynch because I suggested I could see myself voting him. Does that reasoning apply to any slot, or specifically just Glitch?In post 382, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I already answered the question if you’d pay any attention.
I posted the first thought to pressure him further cause all he had given at that point was "this is classic scum GL omegalul" and hadn't bothered to respond to the actual substance I had put into the thread. That was not an invitation for him to then go on a Crusade to Spin Literally Everything I Ever Post as scummyIn post 404, Nauci wrote:Hol upIn post 359, GuiltyLion wrote:for somebody who "doesn't feel pressure" you sure felt the need to ramp up your activity and argue with every pointIn post 344, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't feel pressure from a case on me that's as bad as GuiltyLion's.In post 322, Truth wrote:I like GuiltyLion's case and may follow him for a while. Let's vote the person so he feels more pressure when he comes back and then has to respond while being a little self-conscious.
Didn't you shade him for not addressing your accusations point by point when he flat out called it bs?
Are you now shading him for then going and doing that?
Say what now
my dude, when you posted this it was 1 am and I had gone to bed. See also this post where I said, 5 hours earlier, that I would be around for the next 3-4 hours:In post 408, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GuiltyLying also left without answering my question which i helpfully reminded him to do.
Scum claiming.
I also frankly am not going to answer the question, because it's loud and clear that your intent is just to argue with me and paint me as looking bad rather than actually get useful info from it. If you don't think Nauci and CSF are town, tell the thread what you think they've done that's scummy, and we can hash it out. If you think they're town then you shouldn't care why I think they're town, either I'm scum and they're me TMIing real townies, or I'm town and we agree on townreads. Either way there's no point in talking about it except to try to further shade me, which I'm not all that interested in.In post 304, GuiltyLion wrote:I'll be around for the next 3-4 hours so hmu and let's jam, especially the cats cause I want CSF to townread me
If Norway is town then popopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopop is likely scum, especially given the hop on me which I'll get toIn post 411, Nauci wrote:I just found it odd that popopopopo immediately accepted the voting alliance without questioning, and that this in turn was accepted without questioning. It felt alignment indicative to me but I couldn't fathom in which direction without doing some heavy meta lifting
my dudeIn post 416, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It's also bloody hilarious that he calls me out as "tunneling" when that's basically what he's been doing himself. Town!GL is usually much more subtle and takes a look at the whole game, he doesn't double down on a shitpush.
Is this really what you want your legacy to be when I flip green? Why doesn't town!GL make that post?In post 427, popopopopopopo wrote:This post oofIn post 357, GuiltyLion wrote:Norway is trying reeeaaaaalll hard to actsuperconfident that he caught me
This is caught scum posting
This is a pretty bad post here popopoppopopopop. I think it should be clear what I was saying: Norway wasIn post 429, popopopopopopo wrote:In post 357, GuiltyLion wrote:Norway is trying reeeaaaaalll hard to actsuperconfident that he caught meSo is he trying really hard to seem confident or is he hedging? You criticize norwe for doing one thing and then you come at him for doing the opposite too.In post 374, GuiltyLion wrote:Finally, if you were truly confident that you caught me, you wouldn't feel compelled to hedge like you did in the last sentence. "IF GL flips scum, I'm gonna celebrate" like ok bud, you know I'm not flipping scum. If you were town and thought you caught scum and were proud of it, you'd be bragging already and asking others to join you, not awkwardly trying to pretend like you're already proud yet still introducing uncertain tone into it and suddenly switching to future-thinking ("I'm going to celebrate" vs being in the process of actively celebrating).
we also played another newbie where you replaced in and you scumread me and never finished reading D1 where I caught scumIn post 411, Nauci wrote:I have only played 1 game with GL and it was a newbie he replaced into like 2 years ago so I can't even remember his alignment
do you really see nothing suspicious at all with popopoppoppo this game, or how he casually hopped onto me?In post 444, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Now GL is trying to spin things in an entirely different direction, this is known as misdirection.
uh, what? Can we revisit these again:In post 447, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't, because i think there have been plenty good reasons to vote you.
further, I don't care how it makes you look, I care whether you think popopopoppoppoppo might be scum sheeping you onto the leading wagon. I asked you explicitly to assume that I'm town so you can try to walk through his ISO and possibly work with me and show me what you see. Your response suggests you're seemingly incapable of even assuming I'm town for a hypothetical, that's a really dangerous and bad way to play the team game.In post 447, NorwegianboyEE wrote:ell that should be obvious it will make me look bad.
I don't believe you've caught scum because of the way you talk, dude. You display this over the top arrogance/confidence when I don't think that should be really justified, and then at key times you still hedge.In post 450, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You're not my psychiatrist, why are you telling me this: "you don't believe you've caught scum" BS and considering i: "might be town" at the same time? These are inherently incoherent thoughts that just prove all the more how you're not considering my slot from a town perspective.
In post 457, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If you don’t like the fact that your scumread then maybe you shouldn’t have played so bad and started the day off by pushing me for quite frankly, awful reasons.
of course you're not going to say it's scum indicativeIn post 458, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Nothing you stated in post 302 is scum indicative for me. Yet you played like those were good reasons to vote me.
Yeah I believe scum would agree there. Agreeing to a vote pact is meme-y and 'fun', which in this current site meta gets you freebie townreads from generation shitposters bc you aren't "trying too hard", and absolves you from any responsibility for your early game votes - look at his response as to me calling him out for voting me.In post 467, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Let’s say Popopo is scum and is approached by a town player that asks them to vote whoever they do. Would they agree? Do you think it’s scum indicative to do so? Why?
I also think this too! I would say your opening was very much meant to be buddy-buddy with popoopopopopopopopopopopopop, and he had apparently no skepticism towards this whatsoever. That's suspiciousIn post 467, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Or do you think he should be more paranoid about me?