Mini Normal 2149 | Philosophers | Over
Forum rules
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Among other thingsIn post 21, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Quick. This is vital for my read on your slot. Do you have trouble detecting sarcasm and jokeey posts with serious ones?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Once upon a time I would probably have thought this was weird but at this point in 2020 I could be suddenly devoured by a 99 tentacled cthulhu monster appearing out of nowhere in the California sky and be entirely unsurprisedIn post 15, Truth wrote:Interesting. I would like everyone to know I am aMiller Mason. I have buddies but I won't be revealing who they are at this time. For now, I will act as their representative.
We would like a nice clean thread clear of profanities. Whenever giving a read or placing a vote, we would like a reason attached as to avoid people having to ask for the reasons. Thank you, we'll let you know if there's any updates.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I think we should all refrain from taking Quick too seriouslyIn post 52, Truth wrote:So, you think LicketyQuickety is town pushing me in good faith? They did not even consider the scenario that I have buddies to verify my claim in their accusatory post. It seems to me that they're hoping for support in their push.
Just sort of universally applicable advice in any MS game- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Are you aware that the average teenager on Fortnite is more polite than you areIn post 60, osuka wrote:
this is a retarded misrepIn post 59, Truth wrote:I can already see that osuka is approving the push and shading me. Do you think this could be him testing the room to see if there's support?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
In post 73, LicketyQuickety wrote:How about you evaluate people based on play and not claims.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I feel like I agree with the content of your posts oftentimes but it's hard to support the way you put itIn post 91, osuka wrote:
yesIn post 89, Nauci wrote:
Are you aware that the average teenager on Fortnite is more polite than you areIn post 60, osuka wrote:
this is a retarded misrepIn post 59, Truth wrote:I can already see that osuka is approving the push and shading me. Do you think this could be him testing the room to see if there's support?
Like, yeah, those posts weren't smart, but I don't think somebody is remedial based on that...- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Calling a post stupid because it's not super logical isn't shading though... Osuka explicitly said to not lynch a mason claim today as well. I don't know why you're posting as if dumb posts are exclusively the territory of scum; they're not at all synonymous.In post 95, Truth wrote:
That is exactly my point. You are calling me out and shading me while not advocating my lynch. This looks like a mafia play to me. If people agree with you and start voting me, I expect you will then be fine with my lynch, but right now, you are not pushing it because it may make you look like mafia if not enough people get behind it.In post 90, osuka wrote:
that's just not true at all. i'm calling your stupid plays out as what they are: stupid plays. I'm not advocating for anyone's lynch and if you legitimately believe that, youre delusionalIn post 74, Truth wrote:In post 61, osuka wrote:i'm starting to have serious doubts that you're mason
I will ignore your insult and point out the obvious: You are shading me without advocating my lynch. You are testing the waters to see if others are open to pushing me, in which case you would join. That is what it looks like to me.In post 62, osuka wrote:59 does not come from any town with an iq that has anywhere near 3 digits
I feel like you've misread Osuka's posts completely. Re-evaluate your premises and logic after rereading.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Did you mean to say "fake masons" instead of "fake millers" in this post?In post 70, Glitch wrote:Good evening folks,
What is that even supposed to mean, act as their representative?In post 15, Truth wrote:Interesting. I would like everyone to know I am a Miller Mason. I have buddies but I won't be revealing who they are at this time. For now, I will act as their representative.
Truth's immediate claim is kinda ballsy unless it's true. I feel 59 was just pushing back, why is it such a bad idea?osuka wrote:59 does not come from any town with an iq that has anywhere near 3 digits
Changing gears, 44 isn't the greatest comeback with the whole fake millers are all mafia argument (if I'm understanding that right). That would be such a huge downfall for the scum if they identified together and then one gets lynched and we find out who they are. Of course we would take the rest down. That just sounds like a terrible strategy I would never think the scum would use unless they were complete morons. So VOTE: LicketyQuickety because scum aren't stupid and we have to hunt smart.
Lick, what would your strategy be as scum? Fly under the radar? Big and bold to seem fearless of dying? Something else?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I would also like to know thisIn post 136, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
Why did you claim Miller Mason? Why didn't you just claim the Miller aspect of your role?In post 116, Truth wrote:I may or may not be in a neighbourhood. I am open to someone claiming neighbours with me which I will play along with. Of course, it might also be my real neighbour if I am in a neighbourhood. This would be the Wifom element at play, and should make it difficult for mafia to decide whether I am a Mason or a neighbour.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
This is a good assessmentIn post 147, mavsfan41 wrote:So I haven’t fully finished the read but wanted to comment about LicketyQuickety going after the miller/mason claim. In 84, you mention the two possibilities for going after Truth’s claim. I would argue it’s #1 and he’s new vs #2. Post 52 should tell you that. Truth saying he has his mason buddies coming forward to verify his claim, that would look horrible coming from scum. If scum!Truth is fake claiming miller/mason then his buddies would be scum. To 1) be scum and suggest his partners will verify his claim is one helluva gambit if ANYONE of them were to be lynched, you could easily link them together 2) to not know how that would sound saying he has buddies coming forward with players being skeptical of his claim and not being aware of the optics of this. This tells me that he hasn’t even considered how scummy it would be to say “hey guys. I have a private chat and will show guilty to a cop’s investigation, but don’t worry cause I’ve got people in that private chat to verify I’m town.” That sounds scummy af and Truth seems to just not have even considered the optics. Basically his 52 reads to me like someone being like I’m confirmed town cause my buddies will back me up without even considering scum could make the same exact claim with scum buddies backing that fake claim up. As of right now, I hafta accept his claim here (at least for now).- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
In post 151, Truth wrote:Mafia will know I am confirmed town because I am either telling the truth or lying and am mafia. So they would want to kill a confirmed town in the night.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
VOTE: Candy ShopIn post 157, Candy Shop wrote:
So in case of a lynch without any info, we're more likely to hit town than mafia. Accordingly, we have to get more info on scum from the lynch than the value of losing a player.In post 127, popopopopopopo wrote:i meant to quote the whole post there.
I'm sure that we're marginally more likely to hit mafia with this method on the first day than a completely random RNG lynch but that is not the test IMO.
The real test is whether the net information gained from the reactions of people from being pressured outweighs the high chance of a potential loss of a townie. When I say net information I also mean to include negative utility information for town such as the fact that the mafia knows of the existence of a masonry when it did not need to.
This logic works better the more investigative roles there are in the game though because the more there are the more it makes sense to wait for a night.
I haven't seen anything yet to lose a townie in a 13 player game so far.
VOTE: NO LYNCH- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Y'all are going to turn me into osuka at this rateIn post 164, Truth wrote:I am okay with not lynching today. Going to even numbers alive on a day is bad, but if a doctor protects me we would actually be back on odd numbers. And not lynching on the first day is better than later on because of the proportion of mafia and town.
VOTE: no lynch- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I think it's incredibly plausible that scum would try to sidetrack town on a bizarre and potentially heated mechanics discussion, especially if there's already a quagmire of it from the miller mason claim. Easier to keep IIOA going than to genuinely push, no?In post 170, NorwegianboyEE wrote:But i don’t think scum would say things like this so light TR on those slots... maybe.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Do the number of posts trying to explain to you that it would make no sense for either scum to target you or for a doctor to save you not have any impact on your views whatsoever?In post 185, Truth wrote:Since we will likely go to even numbers at some point this game due to a doctor saving me or my buddies, why not no lynch on the first day?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
IIRC there's no multi-ball in Mini NormalsIn post 189, osuka wrote:no multiball- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Just chiming in to say that Osuka definitely does this as town so it's probably NAIIn post 191, LicketyQuickety wrote:
This is kinda Scummy.In post 189, osuka wrote:
omegalul what planet do you live on? NL is almost universally bad unless you're in myloIn post 185, Truth wrote:Could I suggest we move on from this discussion for now and pretend it didn't happen?
As for the arguments to not no lynch, my thinking was that people usually no lynch on even numbers because it makes no difference in the number of lynches left and gives our roles more information. Since we will likely go to even numbers at some point this game due to a doctor saving me or my buddies, why not no lynch on the first day?
you're literally going to give me an aneurysm if you keep talking about the game, you, and your buddies the way you are. it's giving me an almost unbearable urge to put my head through the wall
there's also zero guarantee that there is only one killing role. that means no vig, no neutral-aligned killer, and no multiball (though this last one is pretty unlikely)
It seems OTT.
It also seems like you are not doing anything at all except complaining about how bad Truth is playing. I haven't really seen you do any Scum hunting. Your completely focussed on the claim and nothing else. Don't like this look from you. If you are as smart as you think you are, you would just ignore Truth and hunt elsewhere.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Considering this was on page 8 maybe you should have been pressuring somewhere and not making the Mafiascum post equivalent of Hint WaterIn post 194, Truth wrote:Well, does anyone have any strong feelings of mafia from any other players? I would be fine with lynching but it doesn't seem like anyone has any leads.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
is this part of the 2020 Black Mirror plotIn post 208, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I didn't call it a push.In post 204, osuka wrote:
he actually can be forgiven for missing your "push" because honestly I'm staggered that you dared call it a push in the first placeLicketyQuickety wrote:
How could you possibly have missed that? It's on the same page you said people were too focussed on your claim that I pointed out Osuka is too focussed on your claim. How exactly DID you miss that?In post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: Osuka
what timeline am I in- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
You know how I kept trying to explain to people in our last game that your viewpoints make perfect sense to you in your head, but you're not able to get them out fully in your posts so that people are misinterpreting you or don't understand you frequently? You know how you wish that people would be more intellectually charitable to you about your points?In post 228, LicketyQuickety wrote:
You realize you holding this position makes you look really bad if Truth flips Scum, right? Like, you have a bad case of a double standard here. On the one hand, you say Truth is stupid, but for some reason you feel content to otherwise leave the slot alone in terms of actually giving a Town/Scum read on that slot. On the other hand, you want to PL me because... why, exactly? Because I pushed you for your non-committal, complaining that doesn't help solve the game at ALL? No one can see your notes, bro. Why do you expect us to just believe you are Town here. But far be it from anyone else to push you. Oh no, can't have that, can we?In post 226, osuka wrote:
He’s just really dense and he doesn’t like how I talk, I take itIn post 224, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:In post 194, Truth wrote:Well, does anyone have any strong feelings of mafia from any other players? I would be fine with lynching but it doesn't seem like anyone has any leads.
What made you start suspecting osukaIn post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: Osuka
So your stance on Truth is Scummy since you haven't actually said anything about that slot in terms of Scum/Town except to say they are incompetent - meanwhile, me, who is trying their hardest to sort the claim while providing other takes on the game as well you want to PL for having one stance you disagree with, namely, a push on you for doing nothing but complaining? Yeah, inconsistent isn't the half of it.
Why don't you apply that to how you read osuka's posts. Osuka's narrative makes sense from their perspective based on how he has read your posts. You fully contradicted yourself within 5 posts of saying you pushed osuka, and are now completely misconstruing what they're saying. You have extremely high confidence in your opinions even though most players won't agree with your premises or your conclusions and it makes your posting frequently anti-town. This isn't the first or last time people have talked about policy-lynching you and it's not happening repeatedly because every single one of these players is completely insane in the same way. Take a breather and re-evaluate the last 2 pages with more intellectual charity in mind.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Unfortunately I don't find QuickLogic™ or QuickDefensiveness™ alignment indicative because I've only played with Town!Quick and he's always like thisIn post 246, osuka wrote:
and there it is, the classic scum meltdown into omgusIn post 235, LicketyQuickety wrote:
What would you call it besides a push? I did say it was a push, but the fact that you focus on my wording instead of my actions tells a whole lot more about you then me. It was pretty clear that I put pressure on you. call it a push, call it pressure, call it Scum hunting, doesn't really matter what you call it. It's pretty clear you keep majoring on the minors. First it was my word choice, now it's something about how you personally categorize stuff, meanwhile, you HAVEN'T actually put any pressure, pushed, Scum hunted really anyone in this game at all except me based on a technicality that is beyond weak. For lack of a better term, it's a bad push.In post 204, osuka wrote:
he actually can be forgiven for missing your "push" because honestly I'm staggered that you dared call it a push in the first placeLicketyQuickety wrote:
How could you possibly have missed that? It's on the same page you said people were too focussed on your claim that I pointed out Osuka is too focussed on your claim. How exactly DID you miss that?In post 200, Truth wrote:I am reading. I don't remember everything. I am suspicious of Osuka as well so I can help here.
VOTE: Osuka
VOTE: Osuka
For the contradiction of pushing me and not Truth.
there's a lot to unpack here. in order: you didn't even cast shade on me. You literally just said "this post is kinda scummy and over the top" and proceeded to do ~literally fucking nothing~ about it, other than using it as leverage to defend yourself vs truth's own pseudo-push.
"the minors" are where people who are at least halfway competent slip in this game. the way you say things often reveals much more than the things you're actually saying (or omitting). Even if completely ignoring the fact that I actually did exactly what you suggested in 191 (i.e., pushed someone else - just happened to be you), i find it very difficult to believe that the sequence in 195-198-201-202 topped off by 208 comes from town
you got overly defensive way too quick and tried to spin the situation as if i was the offending party, when in fact you very directly contradicted yourself after making a very noncommittal poke at me to use it elsewhere in the game, then flipping right back to whatever version of it was most convenient for you at the time- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
That is, in fact, what I was referring to. Specifically, day 2 of that game.
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Dude what is with you and literally posting just to say you are ignoring my posts this gameIn post 260, LicketyQuickety wrote:Don't care about this until you link where osuka has been OTT.
Like wtf is the point of doing that repeatedly- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Just to be clear for everyone else, the "nothing OTT" game that Quick purportedly just skimmed involved Osuka and Formerfish going so completely over the top with mocking 2 players' posts (and themselves) that 7/9 players in the game replaced out then and there, and at least 1 sitewide ban was given.In post 264, LicketyQuickety wrote:I didn't see anything I would consider OTT.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
EBWOPIn post 266, Nauci wrote:
Just to be clear for everyone else, the "nothing OTT" game that Quick purportedly just skimmed involved Osuka and Formerfish going so completely over the top with mocking 2 players' posts (and those players themselves) that 7/9 players in the game replaced out then and there, and at least 1 sitewide ban was given.In post 264, LicketyQuickety wrote:I didn't see anything I would consider OTT.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
osuka wrote:
uh sorry i seem to have missed this postIn post 1299, Freddiethelady wrote:
you’ve said yourself that I’m a bad player many times, so Going off that, how likely is it that I’m strategic enough to be scum? Is that a chance you’re willing to take when Deciding whether you should risk voting another lynch? Are you taking that into consideration, or are you happy with Just anyone hanging....In post 1264, Formerfish wrote:Freddie, why shouldn't you die today?
this is probably the worst post in the thread so far. Everyone in this thread is now slightly more brain damaged than they were before having read this pile of dogshit, dumpster fire of a postosuka wrote:but like holy fuckiNG BALLSACK HAVE YOU OUTDONE YOURSELVESosuka wrote:
and as if the rest of the post wasn't bad enough, this is the shit-cherry on top of the garbage-cake that is this post. like if the post before this one gave everyone brain damage, this one is certain to cause everyone in a 50-mile radius and all of their children to lose all higher brain functionIn post 1314, Freddiethelady wrote:question: is it common to suspect someone is lying who confirms themselves as town like i did? i guess i answered my own question by observing that im still under scrutiny even though i confirmed my role.
to be clear: the only thing youve confirmed is that you absolutely need to be lynched today. I'm deathtunneling you until either of us is on the dead threadosuka wrote:
whatever you say - i find it nearly impossible to convey how bad some of this content is in any other way. feel free to chime in with some vocabulary you think is not dick-worthy and i'll make sure to read whatever you come up withIn post 1336, votato wrote:osuka, you are clearly being a dick and making it personal. stop being a dick. and yes, i mean that you as a person are being a dick, outside the context of this game.
also, at this point freddie is 100% town. i know her well enough to know that she's being honest here. she hasnt quite grasped this game, but shes trying. maybe constructive criticism or feedback would be better for both your emotional wellbeing, hers, and the game. i guess you're entitled to be a dick if you want though.
i guess ill effort tomorrow and say some things.
freddie is not 100% town and neither are you.
as an addendum, my emotional wellbeing is, in fact, untouched by whatever she could possibly say in this thread
Just a few of the posts which happened in that gameosuka wrote:have i lost my mind? is this real life? I think my reality is collapsing
can a collapsing mind objectively observe its own collapse? and if something is only real if it is objectively observable, then is my mind really collapsing? or has my mind never been real?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
...Are you saying it's logically inconsistent to scum-read someone and to pressure that person for more content to evaluate at the same time?In post 270, LicketyQuickety wrote:The long and short of it is that I don't think osuka actually thinks I am Scum. They put a "high confidence" read out there with one thing they say and in another thing they say they call what they are doing a push. Not sure I really get the logic or consistency there. On the one hand, he's "sure" I am Scum and on the other he thinks I am a good person to push to get more out of. Not sure I really get the second iteration there as I have pretty much been an open book this game.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I 100% believe that scum put on this type of show sometimes but I 0% believe that either Quick or Osuka could do thatIn post 293, Truth wrote:Could they not be performing an act of WIFOM? Where they intentionally push each other with reasons that seem legitimate, but it's because they know people will think they are town for doing them.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Woah you even hate me!?In post 301, osuka wrote:
the latterIn post 299, Glitch wrote:osuka - town but omg does this guy have any friends or does he just hate everyone lol
glitch can be town for now
I don't know if my ego could ever recover from this deprivation of Osuka senpai's love- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I had similar reactions to the hedging languageIn post 302, GuiltyLion wrote:
First two lines feel like scum tryna just like... comment on the game, and then I don't like the way he hedges throughout - "inclined to believe" feels like awkward scum-writing-about-their-fake-thoughts rather than just actually having them.In post 64, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Man i’m loving the vibes i’m getting from this game already.In post 61, osuka wrote:i'm starting to have serious doubts that you're mason
This should be entertaining.
As for Truth’s claim i don’t usually see scum planning to make a miller mason claim within very short time of game start, so unless this is some next level WIFOM play by scum i’m inclined to believe the slot for now. Even if i think some of their posts have been a bit awkward.
"I implore you to abandon this push"? Norway I don't remember you ever speaking so awkwardly formally like this in our games together?In post 78, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Quick, if you are town i implore you to abandon this push. It’s quite a reach to assume someone is scum for claiming miller mason, and then suggesting they will only tell the truth when they’ve already stated their name has no bearing on behaviour.
Shade but no vote or further pressure. It's not clear to me what Norway's read on Quick really is - he constantly talks to him as if he townreads him but then what's the point of a post like this?In post 79, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Having a dialogue with your scumread is natural and has many benefits to town. Don’t like how you’re trying to portray it negatively here.In post 73, LicketyQuickety wrote:Oh, you are trying to dialog with a SR. That's interesting. "shoot first ask questions later"?
This vibes to me like a mafia response to someone advocating for No Lynch - contrast how others helpfully at least gave some reasoning for why no lynch is bad, this is just LAMIST.In post 158, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Please no. Stop arguing for no lynch.
I can’t take having to explain why it’s a dumb idea.
only later he decides to jump in:
scumdar firing hard on the awkward "(Assuming you are town.)"In post 168, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If you are no lynching you are basically throwing the game and wasting your slot and town’s chance to win. (Assuming you are town.)
I already called this out but this progression is bad, these posts were FOUR HOURS apart:In post 130, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It’s been 8 hours and you’re voting GL based on inactivity?In post 172, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GuiltyLion, can you please come in and obvtown it up soon. Your RVS entrance coupled with disappearing hasn’t exactly filled me to the brin with confidence regarding your slot.
Currently I'm struggling with the dynamic between him and popopopopo
Like... Should I consider it suspicious that they just entered into a vote-slave pact on the spot without questioning each other for it or is this some typical NAI shenanigans? I'm entirely puzzled by it and also puzzled by the lack of commentary on it. In light of the stuff that pinged you about Norwegian, what do you think?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Semi-coherent narcissism?In post 303, Glitch wrote:Need more info to figure out this whole LQ vs osuka shitshow
I want to know more about LQ and his playstyle and see what's going on. LQ never answered my question at the beginning:
My vote stays on you for now cause this whole thing confuses me and you're not looking squeaky cleanIn post 70, Glitch wrote:Lick, what would your strategy be as scum? Fly under the radar? Big and bold to seem fearless of dying? Something else?
Which is an enormous improvement from 2 years ago which I would describe as fully incoherent narcissism. I've never seen scum!quick nor pro-town!quick ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
His logic and premises always appear rock solid to him and he takes his views to be fact, and then builds his idea of everyone else based on his views and premises. This usually leads to a few different scenarios, like A: Quick super scum tunnels on someone because their scum reads and posts, while consistent in their open read evolutions and perspective, doesn't make sense in Quick's mind so they absolutely must be scum, B: Quick misreads several posts and builds an elaborate "logical" conclusion on completely inaccurate premises and it takes 10 pages to talk him out of that, or C: Quick has a solid read on someone built on solid reasoning and premises but only explains like 15% of his theory so none of the rest of us get what he's saying.
I have yet to figure out how to tell if it's Scum!Quick but I'm pretty good at sorting the NAI Quicksotic components so that he's not lynched as low hanging fruit ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I agree with the first half of this postIn post 305, LicketyQuickety wrote:299
Most of this is just IIoA without really committing to anything. I didn't even see a vote in this post, which concerns me a lot actually.
P-edit: GL's tunnel on Norwegian seems ill founded. Norwegian seems Town from seeing them as Scum twice recently. This looks to be a pretty easy push on Norwegian, who IS actually questioning things and Scum hunting. Might not look like much, but it's way less of an agenda based play than I am used to seeing from Noway!Scum. It also gives GL the excuse to keep his vote where it is.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I really want you and lion to be town so we can have a town block of Cats
Please please please don't be scum I should be so sad- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Do you think their vote pact is something 2 scum would do together?In post 322, Truth wrote:I like GuiltyLion's case and may follow him for a while. Let's vote the person so he feels more pressure when he comes back and then has to respond while being a little self-conscious.
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
popo feels like mafia as well.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
How so?In post 352, LicketyQuickety wrote:LOL. IDK about how strong Norway is pushing GL as a kind of OMGUS, but this sure looks different from his Scum game.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Lolwtf is this post evenIn post 349, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Take a look at post 16 for me crumbing that i would take this stance.In post 347, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GL's first post actually pinged me hard, but i held back on commenting it until i'd seen what he would be up to. Since i've clearly seen his bad intentions by now there's no point concealing it.
Making a "RVS" vote like that on a random familiar slot and then leaving without doing any solving is an archtypical scum entrance i've seen a couple times by this point. Especially on my home forum. I can't explain it well. But if GL flips scum i'm going to celebrate my ability to see right through shit like that.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Hol upIn post 359, GuiltyLion wrote:
for somebody who "doesn't feel pressure" you sure felt the need to ramp up your activity and argue with every pointIn post 344, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
I don't feel pressure from a case on me that's as bad as GuiltyLion's.In post 322, Truth wrote:I like GuiltyLion's case and may follow him for a while. Let's vote the person so he feels more pressure when he comes back and then has to respond while being a little self-conscious.
Didn't you shade him for not addressing your accusations point by point when he flat out called it bs?
Are you now shading him for then going and doing that?
Say what now- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Truth is on my list of players I'm not really going to bother sorting on day 1 due to the claimIn post 398, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Nauci how are you reading Truth?
Quick is almost always automatically on that list- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
My painkillers and edibles are kicking in now so I'm going to procrastinate and do all of that meta reading tomorrow
I have only played 1 game with GL and it was a newbie he replaced into like 2 years ago so I can't even remember his alignment
I just found it odd that popopopopo immediately accepted the voting alliance without questioning, and that this in turn was accepted without questioning. It felt alignment indicative to me but I couldn't fathom in which direction without doing some heavy meta lifting- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
In post 421, Looker wrote:Saudade claiming- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
In post 421, Looker wrote:Is this sarcasm? Everything here is written down...forever...why would you need to be reminded of something...? The intent is to sort.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Idk if I'm comfortable with going to bed leaving someone at L-2 this early in a dayIn post 424, popopopopopopo wrote:
Ok senpaiIn post 342, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Popopo
Scum has been caught. Vote GuiltyLion with me or you will be scum claiming. K tnx.
vote: guiltylion- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I kept waiting for him to follow up that comment on me but it never happened so I assumed it was a sort of scum-testing-the-waters thingIn post 439, GuiltyLion wrote:The other thing I don't like about popoppopoopoppopo's vote:
You previously said Nauci was "forced as fuck" and were voting her. Then she quotes one, yes ONE, post of mine she doesn't like, and votes me, and your response is to put me at L-2 with no hesitation? Did your read on Nauci change? Do you think she just decided to lolbus me cause Norway wants to play like he's some RVS god, even though I later linked a game where I opened the exact same way as town? It seems pretty dissonant to me!
VOTE: popopopopopo
But I also made a lot more content between then and now- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
This was a suspiciously blatant misinterpretation of GL's questionIn post 447, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well that should be obvious it will make me look bad. However, i think your play has been way scummier than him so far.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Soo... IS the core of your case OGMUS?In post 457, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If you don’t like the fact that your scumread then maybe you shouldn’t have played so bad and started the day off by pushing me for quite frankly, awful reasons.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Are you trying for an innocence by TSTBSIn post 462, popopopopopopo wrote:
I'm in indentured votitude to norwe if u have a problem with my vote take it up with himIn post 439, GuiltyLion wrote:The other thing I don't like about popoppopoopoppopo's vote:
You previously said Nauci was "forced as fuck" and were voting her. Then she quotes one, yes ONE, post of mine she doesn't like, and votes me, and your response is to put me at L-2 with no hesitation? Did your read on Nauci change? Do you think she just decided to lolbus me cause Norway wants to play like he's some RVS god, even though I later linked a game where I opened the exact same way as town? It seems pretty dissonant to me!
VOTE: popopopopopo- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Why?In post 475, Truth wrote:Also, I think all of the cats are town- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Also, my question to you wasn't about GL vs NBEE, it was about NBEE and popopopopoIn post 475, Truth wrote:
I don't think GuiltyLion and NorwegianboyEE are mafia together. They are really trying to rip each other apart with their points. I like them both currently.In post 401, Nauci wrote:
Do you think their vote pact is something 2 scum would do together?In post 322, Truth wrote:I like GuiltyLion's case and may follow him for a while. Let's vote the person so he feels more pressure when he comes back and then has to respond while being a little self-conscious.
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
popo feels like mafia as well.
Also, I think all of the cats are town so I will be joining you!- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Yeah that about summarizes my feelingsIn post 481, Glitch wrote:This is literally terrible, if it weren't for your mason claim I would have been scum reading you so hard this entire game.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Glitch's 481 smells terrible to me because we are so extremely far past the point of setup analysis I don't see the point of doing yet another wall on the topic except to sound busy
Can we all agree to let that claim go until tomorrow and focus on the rest of the game which has plenty of other substance- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
In post 502, Truth wrote:Should we quickly lynch popopopopopopopopo and go into night? I don't we'll get a better suspect than this and it may be good to go to the night without giving mafia any more information.
I'm putting this slot into the mental equivalent of a quiet corner time out- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I'm liking Mavs so far. Though I've not seen his scum game, his town game seems like it'd be fairly hard to fake as scum.
I think Glitch can be town for now. I don't see how or why scum would be making an honest go at lynching Truth at this point.
I'll read up on some past GL and NBEE games tonight. - Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci