What gives you the reason to believe this? I have told you this isn't true. I'm not sure if you missed my post or are intentionally ignoring it.In post 68, LicketyQuickety wrote:This is not just a "usually" type of player. Their gimmick is that they tell the truth. They are betting on people buying they are telling the truth for as long as they can get away with it.In post 64, NorwegianboyEE wrote:As for Truth’s claim i don’t usually...
In post 61, osuka wrote:i'm starting to have serious doubts that you're mason
I will ignore your insult and point out the obvious: You are shading me without advocating my lynch. You are testing the waters to see if others are open to pushing me, in which case you would join. That is what it looks like to me.In post 62, osuka wrote:59 does not come from any town with an iq that has anywhere near 3 digits
That is exactly my point. You are calling me out and shading me while not advocating my lynch. This looks like a mafia play to me. If people agree with you and start voting me, I expect you will then be fine with my lynch, but right now, you are not pushing it because it may make you look like mafia if not enough people get behind it.In post 90, osuka wrote:that's just not true at all. i'm calling your stupid plays out as what they are: stupid plays. I'm not advocating for anyone's lynch and if you legitimately believe that, youre delusionalIn post 74, Truth wrote:In post 61, osuka wrote:i'm starting to have serious doubts that you're masonI will ignore your insult and point out the obvious: You are shading me without advocating my lynch. You are testing the waters to see if others are open to pushing me, in which case you would join. That is what it looks like to me.In post 62, osuka wrote:59 does not come from any town with an iq that has anywhere near 3 digits
No. It gives the mafia unnecessary information.In post 111, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why? Don't you think that muddies the waters beyond reason?In post 110, Truth wrote:Either way, I am going to use the plural form.
I would like this answered if possible, popo.In post 110, Truth wrote:popo, why is it a bad idea to out if I'm just in a neighbourhood?
I thought it would be a good idea if one of the Masons claimed so that doctors could be used on me. In hindsight I should have checked with my buddies first.In post 138, Nauci wrote:I would also like to know thisIn post 136, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Why did you claim Miller Mason? Why didn't you just claim the Miller aspect of your role?In post 116, Truth wrote:I may or may not be in a neighbourhood. I am open to someone claiming neighbours with me which I will play along with. Of course, it might also be my real neighbour if I am in a neighbourhood. This would be the Wifom element at play, and should make it difficult for mafia to decide whether I am a Mason or a neighbour.
Who are these 3-4?In post 195, LicketyQuickety wrote:I've pushed like 3-4 people besides you. Given I was the first person to question your claim, I would sorta hope that you would have picked up on that.In post 194, Truth wrote:Well, does anyone have any strong feelings of mafia from any other players? I would be fine with lynching but it doesn't seem like anyone has any leads.
Could they not be performing an act of WIFOM? Where they intentionally push each other with reasons that seem legitimate, but it's because they know people will think they are town for doing them.In post 280, ofrhz wrote:Based on their back and forth, I think they both believe in their pushes. I can also understand why they each scumread the other even though I disagree with it.In post 277, Truth wrote:Why are they both town?
As for your leads questions, I was suspecting osuka before that if you check my earlier posts.
They're both independently towny as well. Quick has demonstrated that he has an unusual process of scumhunting, and I think his process is hard to fake.
I'm gut townreading osuka.
Why is osuka scummy for thinking you could be lying about being a mason but not wanting to take the risk of pushing you? A lot of people have expressed disbelief in your mason claim yet no one is pushing for your lynch off the top of my head.
I was actually okay with being lynched so that I could be confirmed, and it would confirm my buddies as masons. But they suggested against this idea.In post 299, Glitch wrote:What's with the backpedaling? It seems like you claimed right off the bat and then realized it wasn't the greatest idea so you're going to leave it a little more open ended and open some other possibilities up. Why?
I don't think GuiltyLion and NorwegianboyEE are mafia together. They are really trying to rip each other apart with their points. I like them both currently.In post 401, Nauci wrote:Do you think their vote pact is something 2 scum would do together?In post 322, Truth wrote:I like GuiltyLion's case and may follow him for a while. Let's vote the person so he feels more pressure when he comes back and then has to respond while being a little self-conscious.
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
popo feels like mafia as well.
1_ I didn't consult with my buddies before claiming and acting as their representative. The suggestions for how people should behave were my own. I regret the claim now, and my buddies have explained to me why it was a bad idea.In post 442, Candy Shop wrote:Truth,
Question 1
What was the thought process behind your miller hood deciding that you would be their representative?
If I was in a group with 3 people and we needed to make a high attention play like that on the first day, we would choose the most experienced player or player with the most relationships with people.
I literally cannot conceive of a scenario where they just go 'Hey June 2020 joinee, take the ball and make the second post in the thread and claim you are a miller mason' and I say that as a June 2020 joinee.
Can you give me a brief summary of the thought process that went into this decision to appoint you as their representative?
Question 2
You were earlier voting for someone accusing you. As soon as I made a post asking if NL can be optimal, you immediately jumped to NL parroting my reasoning that there's no clear info.
If you honestly believed that there were no discernible scum in the beginning like you seemed to believe, why did you vote for LQ the second he started pushing you?
Okay. Maybe. If mafia vote together they can create larger bandwagons and try and get the lynch on someone that isn't mafia but town.In post 478, NorwegianboyEE wrote:He was asking if you thought me and Popopo were scum together. Not me/GL.In post 475, Truth wrote:I don't think GuiltyLion and NorwegianboyEE are mafia together. They are really trying to rip each other apart with their points. I like them both currently.
Because then if my buddies had to claim mason, you would know it's truthful and not mafia trying to get away with a fake claim.In post 481, Glitch wrote:Why would your lynch be beneficial to the town if you confirmed your buddies? Are you now in agreement with your buddies who didn't agree with this plan, or are you still okay with being lynched to supposedly help the town?
I like most of the posts from them. The questions and the reasoning.
Why?In post 504, Nauci wrote:Yeah that about summarizes my feelingsIn post 481, Glitch wrote:This is literally terrible, if it weren't for your mason claim I would have been scum reading you so hard this entire game.
Thank you! Everyone seems to disagree, including even my own buddies. But I honestly think it's okay. Doctors can heal me tonight.In post 517, LicketyQuickety wrote:Honestly, if you ARE millar, whether you are in a hood or masons, you made the right play.In post 513, Truth wrote:If someone could explain to me why my suggestion was bad instead of laughing at it or dismissing it, I would be very grateful.
Glitch's take on your slot seems to make sense, but at the same time, is so off compared to site meta that it wouldn't surprise me either way if they were Scum or Town.
It's linked to my university so I can't say, sorry.In post 716, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Truth, what's your homesite?
It depends on how many other people died in the night. There might be other roles that can kill people. If no dies in the night, I think it's safe to assume I was protected by a doctor.In post 795, Looker wrote:If you don't die tonight, are we expected to believe that a Doctor healed you?
I don't understand this. I will be confirmed town eventually so mafia do want to kill me. If you keep saying things like this, the mafia might try and kill me and the doctors might not heal me because they will be convinced by what you are saying here. I think it'd be a bad play to let me die tonight if you're a doctor and reading this.In post 820, mavsfan41 wrote:@Truth: as for you 808, if no one dies that doesn’t necessarily mean you were saved. It means whomever the doctor targeted during the night is town (unless for whatever reason scum decides not to make a kill N1 which I highly doubt would be the case). I seriously don’t believe that the doctor would ever target you and I seriously doubt scum is going to NK you.