It's not hard pick one.
And now a word from our sponsor Random.org
You can pick numbers here.
But who wants to play a game?
I post gifs of my character...In post 30, Doctor Drew wrote:I am not going to hide my intentions here.
You post gifs of anime.....you move up the Drew scumdar.
Oooo lemme join on this oneIn post 42, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Okay, Drew is town. Time to help catch the scum they caught.
VOTE: Midari
So you are saying my self vote was a scum slip?In post 75, votato wrote:im not saying the self-vote was 100% a scumslip, but its something to be looking at going forward.
What do you mean in "our" experience?Tuxedo Mask wrote:Not in our experience.In post 65, votato wrote:I've heard self- voting in rvs is almost always done by scum. Can anyone confirm that?
In post 97, Deimos27 wrote:The lack of engagement with the game, despite there already being content to discuss, and voting outside the leading wagons. These things are off-putting to me.
It was and Drew reaffirmed this for me. You won't see me break instead you will see me hold the gun to my head to see and feel the rush if its loaded or not.In post 108, word321 wrote:VOTE: Midari Ikishima
I want to see u break
U should rly begin worrying and stop voting urself and those kind of nonsenses
That should be L-2 if Im not mistaken
I would say sorry but we both know what is happening here. Also why does it feel like there are a lot of just fluff in this game?In post 97, Deimos27 wrote:The lack of engagement with the game, despite there already being content to discuss,and voting outside the leading wagons. These things are off-putting to me.
Drew this isn't my first rodeo and I can count. Though I can't post the gif I want to due to this being a PG site...But the anime is a bit TV-14In post 127, Doctor Drew wrote:I was looking to get a response that would either confirm or deny, I got one.In post 125, votato wrote:tbh i chose the vote by looking at the activity overview and chose someone i expected more activity from. according to that its been 7 hours since last post, and he was near the bottom of the list. i wish i could get back to back scum games.
This is way way townier than any response you gave to me in Lovers.
VOTE: Midari
That would be in poor taste. I mean unless you are following the spirit of how this game is made I don't see the issue with it.In post 78, Battle Mage wrote:I am surprised nobody is shading me for voting no lynch...
It wasn't suicide. Maybe he wants justice the only way they know how?In post 80, Deimos27 wrote:From what I've seen of you Battle Mage, it's completely within your meta to play suicidally in RVS, and I don't really know what I gain from voting you for that.
Scumhunting pretty hard 3 pages in. Asking a bunch of questions and demanding answers. I thought it was quite obvious as well as you trying to figure out what XYZ was going to add up to.In post 81, votato wrote: why do you townread me then?
I was going to ask the same thing where did Pii run off to?In post 96, Deimos27 wrote:I like pressure on ceejay here because he showed up for one RVS vote on what I perceive to be a suboptimal target, and then proceeded to disappear. I would like pressure on pi for similar reasons.
I need to ask you why? Is there nothing to be driven or derived from 5 pages in at all? So you are telling me there is nothing of value in those pages?In post 105, word321 wrote:there is no such a thing as good guess on page 5 tho
Oh due to me not having much to say as well.In post 145, Deimos27 wrote:I'm not sure why you feel inclined to say sorry, but I'll expound on my initial statement there because it seems a little unclear still.In post 138, Midari Ikishima wrote:I would say sorry but we both know what is happening here. Also why does it feel like there are a lot of just fluff in this game?In post 97, Deimos27 wrote:The lack of engagement with the game, despite there already being content to discuss,and voting outside the leading wagons. These things are off-putting to me.
What I'm looking for in RVS is people voting strategically and making comments that appear to come from a gamesolving disposition.
Pi's and ceejay's votes lacked this.
Great scott. HE'S SOLVED IT.
I have a few games on site if you wanted to look for meta. But I don't believe in meta. If that's what you are asking.In post 171, Deimos27 wrote:Specifically, have you rolled scum in forum mafia before?In post 167, Deimos27 wrote:Midari, what's your experience with mafia?
So will we have someone lynched before page 20 or is this going to be a long one?In post 176, brassherald wrote:I can't tell the present, just the future.In post 165, Midari Ikishima wrote:Does this mean you will tell us on page 8?
Any reason why?In post 199, piisirrational wrote:I feel like simply voting yourself would be something that would be done more by scum than by town, as scum would have more reasons to self-vote I think.In post 65, votato wrote:I've heard self- voting in rvs is almost always done by scum. Can anyone confirm that?
What about them? I tend to forget about people not actively playing the game. I could say the same for Pii and Wors as well.In post 246, word321 wrote:what about superbowl?
You can bring it back but I believe they are a null read due to this being their first time out of the kiddie pool if I'm not mistaken. I don't like their pressure that was faux on Doctor Drew and finding out the alignment of one player so quickly does draw suspicious pings from me.In post 240, ceejayvinoya wrote:The way the conversation has drifted away from tuxedo mask is slightly concerning, though perhaps there is nothing more to be discussed about him.
I haven't sorted Marashu out yet roughly a null read at the moment. Word does seem scummy for other reasons and I don't believe there was more then one on my wagon. You could say Drew could be scum for the hop back onto it after not liking me posting anime gifs. I'mIn post 248, Tuxedo Mask wrote:This was your wagon at its peak (correct me if I'm wrong), so I'll pose this question to the group is scum on this wagon. I think that's likely. If so, who and how many? My gut says just one, between Marshu and Word. That or the wagon looked to carry it's self well enough, and scum wanted to avoid it.
Could it be Drew is just doing enough to stay off the radar of a lot since there are a lot of lurkers?In post 257, votato wrote:drew is usually scummy. but scum drew is also scummy and obviously so in my experience. so this suggests hmmmm either drew stepped up his scumgame or his towngame
It's not even a reason. I've got you town leaning here. And I don't plan on changing that. Just like I feel Drew is town but a bit clueless.In post 254, Tuxedo Mask wrote:@Midari, if you're only reason for not voting me is because you think this my first game outside of the Newbie lobby, then you're mistaken. I have a handful of finished micros. Also, who's alignment have I found out?
I want to change my vote just because of thisIn post 272, JacksonVirgo wrote:
I went back and read open 779.In post 294, Doctor Drew wrote:Not sure how I missed this, but clueless? Interesting choice of words, am I supposed to have a better understanding of the gamestate this early? Or are you purposely invalidating my reads? Or simply just calling me an idiot lol.
Correct my phone autocorrect does have a mind of its own sometimes.In post 292, Deimos27 wrote:Not sure if "side" is a typo for "site" cause that sentence doesn't really make sense as "side"
I have and I have played here before. I haven't played much in a long time though recently coming back to mafia after life being busy.In post 290, Tuxedo Mask wrote:@Midari what's your experience? Have you played Forum mafia on other sites?
I don't like to change my reads on a "town block" on day 1 unless there is a slip so egregious it's maddening.In post 289, Deimos27 wrote:The "I don't plan on changing that" is also a disgusting thing to say in general.
I just don't really put much weight in tonal gutpings from what I perceive to be newbie slots.
What are your top reads at this point?In post 312, Doctor Drew wrote:Then why are you giving me shit for not having it figured out?In post 311, Midari Ikishima wrote:We both know who is. Are people trying to solve this on day one?
Sure why not. For the humor.In post 319, Battle Mage wrote:an opportunity arises - we have 3 days to lynch Votato before he returns from V/LA. assuming piss shows up beforehand.
People be lurking.
I didn't see the hidden vote from WorchestIn post 396, word321 wrote:L-1
In post 393, Worcestershire wrote:I'm still thinking.In post 383, Tuxedo Mask wrote:What can I do to get you to stop shaking in my pocket?In post 376, Doctor Drew wrote:People seem to be coming around as Tux as town, but I dunno. I do get a vibe that is pocketing me and I can't shake it.
@MOD Marashu is on the VC twice, one of which is voting themselves.
What's up worsch? What are your strongest reads right now?
In post 219, Worcestershire wrote:Yes, basically that.
In post 217, Worcestershire wrote:The platform has little notoriety in my country.
In post 215, Worcestershire wrote:What you mean ?
In post 184, Worcestershire wrote:"Townbloc" in which sense ?In post 179, Battle Mage wrote:allows me to townbloc youIn post 169, Worcestershire wrote:Why ?
In post 213, Worcestershire wrote:I played a few games on "AoPS" and on a platform called "Zoom", where it is possible to have eye contact with the players. I had a brief trip to "E.M" and "ToS", where I got negative experiences, until I found MafiaScum. My affinity with the theme is average.In post 212, Marashu wrote:I see you signed up right before this game - do you have any prior mafia experience?
10 posts. Nothing of value just parroting someone else's read. Vote with no real reason. Ugh.In post 170, Worcestershire wrote:I'm already playing.
Phone Posting And I scrolled by it while my phone was in my hand. I'm sure you've never done that before?In post 413, Worcestershire wrote:In post 402, Midari Ikishima wrote:I didn't see the hidden vote from WorchestIn post 396, word321 wrote:L-1
Honestly how long are you going to waffle and not put any thoughts down.
VOTE: Worch
It's getting to a point where you are just coasting thru it feels.
How did you not see my vote ?
Best vote of the game. This game has way too many lurkers.
#1. Its Miss.In post 411, Battle Mage wrote:Definitely bad feels about how the Marashu wagon got to -1, and then fell away.
I'm not sure about this progression, Mr Ikishima:
In post 386, Midari Ikishima wrote:People be lurking.
People be V/LA
People town read Demios and Votato I think.
Marashu is scum.
VOTE: Marashu
It's self explanatoryIn post 402, Midari Ikishima wrote:I didn't see the hidden vote from WorchestIn post 396, word321 wrote:L-1
Honestly how long are you going to waffle and not put any thoughts down.
VOTE: Worch
It's getting to a point where you are just coasting thru it feels.
So you have no thoughts on the game.In post 436, Worcestershire wrote:Regarding my participation in the game, I have nothing relevant to share and I do not intend to invent anything to create the false impression of activity.
I hate how people can use this as a tell.In post 431, votato wrote:whoops. If im not invested im probably town
How many games have you seen me in from the start in? Most times I've replaced into games where I have to figure out the motivation from the slot before me. It's quite aggravating sometimes just for how people can muck up a slot.In post 422, votato wrote:well my case rests primarily on midari being scum. but if that isnt enough reason for you to vote someone (FoS on you again), midari's tone/style doesnt match town!midari. more to come.
Imagine my vote is there. I don't want any accidents. I tend not to trust people when it comes to L-1.In post 466, ceejayvinoya wrote: What happened to your self explanatory marashu case???
Counter-pointIn post 456, Battle Mage wrote:an idea:
if we can make it through Day 1 without outting the hider, would it be sensible for everyone to claim a name they would target if they were the hider? this way if the hider dies without their target dying, we will likely have 1 confirmed scum? probably most helpful if we try and get a reasonable diverse spread of names too.
The whole plan looks dumb on second thought. Notice I said I take it back. Right now it doesn't look good.In post 516, word321 wrote:it is hider; my mistake. 1/12 given u r not the hider, 0 if u r.In post 510, Midari Ikishima wrote:Words town with a bad vote.
I take that back.
What cop capabilities?
Also word why is there a tracker and not a vig?
what makes u think im town?
In post 515, Nash wrote:No death confirms a town. I'm assuming the existence of a tracker too, choosing tracker over vig feels better for town to me. Especially in this setup.In post 510, Midari Ikishima wrote:Words town with a bad vote.
I take that back.
What cop capabilities?
Also word why is there a tracker and not a vig?
So if someone picked vig they are anti town?.Hide: every night, you may PM me with the name of someone who you want to hide behind. If that player is a member of the mafia or thevigilante, you will die. If the player you hide behind is targeted for a nightkill by the mafia or vigilante that night, you will die. If you are targeted for a nightkill on a night that you hide behind someone else, that nightkill will not affect you.
Reeeee you don't like the plan you are anti town. I give a situation where you create a false positive but you don't want to hear it? The density of the people in this game is bar none crazy. Instead of entertaining the idea of ANY OTHER PLAN we just have to use a semi random order and not use logic with THIS GTFO.In post 527, Battle Mage wrote:criticising the plan which is clearly in interest of town, on top of everything else.
It's not. Keep trying.In post 535, Battle Mage wrote:Ah this is Midari's first game as scum!
Rude cause you can't think about something going against the grain for other reasons. K.In post 533, Battle Mage wrote:There's no need to be rude. You're simply wrong here, and with the greatest respect, I have more recent experience of this setup than you do, and am well placed to advise on strategy. I can be wrong of course, or indeed I could be scum trying to manipulate the town (although it's quite apparent above that you know that's not a possibility) but to call me an I'm an idiot when I highlight your error is not a good look.In post 531, Midari Ikishima wrote:Reeeee you don't like the plan you are anti town. I give a situation where you create a false positive but you don't want to hear it? The density of the people in this game is bar none crazy. Instead of entertaining the idea of ANY OTHER PLAN we just have to use a semi random order and not use logic with THIS GTFO.In post 527, Battle Mage wrote:criticising the plan which is clearly in interest of town, on top of everything else.
This is illogical for numerous reasons. And don't tell me "the mafia will target each other"
Answer me your after rubbing your two brain cells together.
How many PRs are in the game?
So directing one on a suicide mission is the way to go? Get out.
The false positive argument you made is predicated on the idea of a vigilante.Town should never have a vigilante in this setup, because the player should always choose tracker.As such, there should be no false positive issue. I had thought that was so obvious it didn't warrant mentioning, so apologies I wasn't clear enough at the outset.
Can you please point me to other games where you've had a similar unprompted meltdown as town when you've gone against the consensus and come under slight pressure?