Open 784 - Hard-Boiled (Town Wins!)
Forum rules
- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
I am surprised nobody is shading me for voting no lynch...Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Gah! I've been outted! It's not suicidal though, I have legit reasons...but nobody cares.In post 80, Deimos27 wrote:From what I've seen of you Battle Mage, it's completely within your meta to play suicidally in RVS, and I don't really know what I gain from voting you for that.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
It took you this long to shade me for no reason? You must be scum here! VOTE: votatoIn post 79, votato wrote:
i think we know better than to pay attention to anything you doIn post 78, Battle Mage wrote:I am surprised nobody is shading me for voting no lynch...Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Love it when you go in on me naked
Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
allows me to townbloc youIn post 169, Worcestershire wrote:Why ?
Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Not sure what those reasons would be? other than a guilty conscience?In post 199, piisirrational wrote:
I feel like simply voting yourself would be something that would be done more by scum than by town, as scum would have more reasons to self-vote I think.In post 65, votato wrote:I've heard self- voting in rvs is almost always done by scum. Can anyone confirm that?Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Townbloc as in, I think you are town.In post 184, Worcestershire wrote:
"Townbloc" in which sense ?In post 179, Battle Mage wrote:
allows me to townbloc youIn post 169, Worcestershire wrote:Why ?
Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Examined the ISO of pissirrational - just as I suspected - scum!
VOTE: PissirrationalShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
very serious about the townread, although you've misunderstood the reasonIn post 232, Deimos27 wrote:Battle Mage you're not serious with townreading someone for voting you, right?Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
an opportunity arises - we have 3 days to lynch Votato before he returns from V/LA. assuming piss shows up beforehand.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
I see you haven't played with votato beforeIn post 320, ceejayvinoya wrote:
I see no good reason to do this.In post 319, Battle Mage wrote:an opportunity arises - we have 3 days to lynch Votato before he returns from V/LA. assuming piss shows up beforehand.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
having read it, i dont know why you're subtly shading me, or what you're subtly shading me about.
explain your problem with my vote for piss
then
explain why the fact i've played with votato before is AI here
otherwise, you'll be NEXT.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Doesn't seem like you've thought the votato stuff through! I could buy that you might think that scum-BM would see votato as an easy mislynch, and want to pursue that.In post 331, Marashu wrote:
My problem with your vote on pi is that you would have basically seen his entire ISO minus his RVS vote in your catch-up between 179 and 223. Without addressing any of pi's recent posts, it felt like you were hopping on the wagon to help it build momentum. Pi is null for me, so that conviction of pi's alignment paired with a seeming lack of critical thought about pi is what made me suspect.In post 330, Battle Mage wrote:having read it, i dont know why you're subtly shading me, or what you're subtly shading me about.
explain your problem with my vote for piss
then
explain why the fact i've played with votato before is AI here
otherwise, you'll be NEXT.
My problem with you playing with votato before is more in relation to you wanting to flashlynch votato. He tends to be lynchbait, from what I've seen. Trying to push him while V/LA when you know how he plays seems suspect.
But do you really think that my strategy for doing that would be to openly suggestwagonning him while he is V/LA, without giving any reasons, or even voting him myself? It's completely implausible that BM-scum actually thinks he can achieve a mislynch with that approach. Additionally, if you're suggesting I think votato's lynchbait, why would I need to wait until he's V/LA? Surely the opposite is true. Moreover, I don't even agree with your characterisation of him, so that's your opinion, not mine.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
On pi, I may not fully understand your point here. He has only posted like 4 times? It's not a difficult ISO to read. I'm not sure why hopping on a wagon to help it build momentum is necessarily scummy. I'm not clear why you preferred to assume I don't have any critical thought about Pi to substantiate my vote, and rather than ask me why I voted for him, simply start shading me over it.In post 331, Marashu wrote:
My problem with your vote on pi is that you would have basically seen hisIn post 330, Battle Mage wrote:having read it, i dont know why you're subtly shading me, or what you're subtly shading me about.
explain your problem with my vote for piss
then
explain why the fact i've played with votato before is AI here
otherwise, you'll be NEXT.entireISO minus his RVS vote in your catch-up between 179 and 223. Without addressing any of pi's recent posts, it felt like you were hopping on the wagon to help it build momentum. Pi is null for me, so that conviction of pi's alignment paired with a seeming lack of critical thought about pi is what made me suspect.
My problem with you playing with votato before is more in relation to you wanting to flashlynch votato. He tends to be lynchbait, from what I've seen. Trying to push him while V/LA when you know how he plays seems suspect.Are you afraid of engaging in direct dialogue with me?
If Pi is null for you, you obviously haven't graduated from the BM-school of scumhunting.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
I just remembered this was you. Not even sure what the point of this post was? complete fluffIn post 85, Marashu wrote:
You mean besides this?In post 78, Battle Mage wrote:I am surprised nobody is shading me for voting no lynch...Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Marashu's ISO is horrible. Lots of examples of going out of his way to be helpful, without scumhunting. I remember when I was a newbie, I had a similar approach as scum - it bolsters the post count and makes it seem like you're contributing actively when you aren't having to really commit to anything. And a real lack of self-awareness in his remarks to Midari in post 328, accusing Midari of "looking for reasons to suspect me" when his whole post strikes a similar tone.
In post 119, Marashu wrote:@votato you should put your vote somewhere.
Also I just noticed that Worcestershire hasn't posted yet.In post 155, Marashu wrote:
Says the person who opened with the exact same post...In post 153, ceejayvinoya wrote:Good job Worcestershire. You gottem.In post 212, Marashu wrote:I see you signed up right before this game - do you have any prior mafia experience?
In post 226, Marashu wrote:
Regarding the distribution of votes, it was discussed briefly in Newbie 2002.In post 225, word321 wrote:either way, I still dnt buy completely deimos attitude. I feel the particular questions he has made r too generic in nature, too general, and easily replicable as scum to feign an investigation of sorts (im talkin about things like 48, 168 and 173 as the most generic, others can be replicable). Im also not convinced of the actual intent behind the even distribution of votes; do u have any game when u have openly upheld such an opinion?
VOTE: Deimos
ninjaed by the aboveIn post 228, Marashu wrote:
I was in that game and remembered it coming up.In post 227, brassherald wrote:Wait, why are you responding, Marashu?In post 87, Marashu wrote:
By "we" and "our" are you referring to yourself and votato?In post 86, Tuxedo Mask wrote:
We're talking about the Treestump game we played where a townie self voted on like page 2.In post 81, votato wrote:What do you mean in "our" experience?Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
we are like brothers, you and I.In post 340, Deimos27 wrote:Or at least, his push on Marashu here makes me feel a lot better about that read. Because I've been getting tonal gutpings from Marashu since the start and we clearly have resonance about that.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
looks to me like he's basically random voting here. Not saying that means he's town, but I think calling it "terrible" is a stretch, and you're overthinking it here. I'm sure your heart is in the right place though.In post 351, word321 wrote:actually
VOTE: superbowl
i didnt comment in deep at the time (i did feint on 276) but his vote on 238 is terrible; it seems he is trying to justify his hop, and ends up way too artifitial, as in trying to justify an attitude he is taking on an otherwise "weird way". I am doubting ur honesty here, sir.
It would be easier if you just joined the Marashu train before it leaves the station.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
good job mate, I like this.In post 355, Deimos27 wrote:I liked that Tux accepted a real time interaction with me and I liked how he was approaching Midari. I also changed my mind about the way he was flinging his vote around and decided that scum is actually typically quite loathe to do that due to self-awareness about voting patterns.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
I don't see it dude. The justification was weak, and scarcely more than a random vote to wagon - which in itself, I don't find objectionable. If he was pitching it as a super serious vote, I'd be more interested. I'm not convinced everyone else had amazing reasons for voting pi either, as they'd probably only visited the BM school of scumhunting on one of our Open Days, rather than attending an accredited course.In post 358, Deimos27 wrote:I think word has a point on superbowl. That justification was so weak that the wagon hop comes off as extremely artificial.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
ah you beat me to the punch, but yes this.In post 361, Deimos27 wrote:
On second thought superbowl literally says "wagon hop" in that post so I think he's aware that he's just shifting for the pressure wagon and the reasoning isn't meant to be deep, which weakens the tell.In post 358, Deimos27 wrote:I think word has a point on superbowl. That justification was so weak that the wagon hop comes off as extremely artificial.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
I was referring to our previous game together, and hoping we could re-kindle our victorious partnership (where you essentially won us the game).In post 356, Tuxedo Mask wrote:
Save your ass from what? I think you guys are handling it well. Also, I think I'm going to hold onto my vote a little longer, give some of the none entities time to post. But if I was to do it right now, I'd toss it on Midira.In post 354, Battle Mage wrote:Tux, vote Marashu and save my ass again!Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
this is town vibes for me.In post 365, word321 wrote:pi havent posted for 3 days, i dnt think we r hearing from him on the near time.
i can wrap my hear around ur change of perception on tuxedo for his development since 237. but I still think superbowls vote wasnt exactly rvs. I did the exact same thing on This post of Large Normal 227; and a simple glance at his topics on the site indicate a lack of mafia pts, wich means few or none experience with scum (at least on this site).
Scum
piisirattional
Marashu
Town
Deimos27
word321
Third Party
Doctor Drew
To be confirmed
Tuxedo Mask
votato
ceejayvinoya
brassherald
superbowl9
Midari Ikishima
WorcestershireShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
....erm, no? what would give you that idea?In post 369, Tuxedo Mask wrote:
Yeah, I got that, but are you trying to find out if I'm a PR again?In post 364, Battle Mage wrote:
I was referring to our previous game together, and hoping we could re-kindle our victorious partnership (where you essentially won us the game).In post 356, Tuxedo Mask wrote:
Save your ass from what? I think you guys are handling it well. Also, I think I'm going to hold onto my vote a little longer, give some of the none entities time to post. But if I was to do it right now, I'd toss it on Midira.In post 354, Battle Mage wrote:Tux, vote Marashu and save my ass again!
I'm simply keen to enlist your vote to help put pressure on Marashu, and also to see if you can join my townbloc of awesomeness.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
You're probably just paranoid about me (again)In post 371, Tuxedo Mask wrote:
That's what I hope, but this being when and how you try to interact with me feels off. Like when you say specifically for me to "save you again" and saying "I won the game" when both of those things only happened because I was the Jailkeeper feels very weird to me. Maybe I'm overthinking it, but you're just giving me the hibbie jibbies right now.In post 370, Battle Mage wrote:
....erm, no? what would give you that idea?In post 369, Tuxedo Mask wrote:
Yeah, I got that, but are you trying to find out if I'm a PR again?In post 364, Battle Mage wrote:
I was referring to our previous game together, and hoping we could re-kindle our victorious partnership (where you essentially won us the game).In post 356, Tuxedo Mask wrote:
Save your ass from what? I think you guys are handling it well. Also, I think I'm going to hold onto my vote a little longer, give some of the none entities time to post. But if I was to do it right now, I'd toss it on Midira.In post 354, Battle Mage wrote:Tux, vote Marashu and save my ass again!
I'm simply keen to enlist your vote to help put pressure on Marashu, and also to see if you can join my town block of awesomeness.
VOTE: Battle Mage
Those things did only happen because you were jailkeeper, but hey I'm not ungrateful! My town win rate needs all the help it can get!
If you think me referring to our only other shared game as a symbol of our bond, where you happened to be a PR, is me fishing for your role here...I dunno what to tell ya!Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
his vote on me? I'm pretty neutral on it. Instinctively it feels townie, but I saw scum pull literally the same move on me in a recent completed game of mine.In post 372, word321 wrote:ok, tuxedo may be town; i rly dnt see that being pulled out by scumShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
not the PR bit specifically, which isn't really relevant (as the idea Tux genuinely thinks I'm scum fishing for a PR here stretches credulity beyond anything I'm willing to accept), but the principle of scum being buddied by somebody town and pushing back vociferously on it, and using it as a crutch to scumhunt. Originally I felt surely scum would be quite happy being buddied, and at least not try to 1v1 the guy doing it which seems counter-productive. But on reflection, it's quite an easy way to get into the game on the front foot by attacking them (and also being buddied might make them nervous of extra attention anyway). To your point, it would really only require Tux-scum to fake some paranoia and use that to base his vote on - I'm certain he's capable of that as scum. Ultimately it's NAI for me.In post 375, word321 wrote:being paranoid thiniking of pr baiting due to a reference to other game, and being consistent with the push on it executed by scum?
i find it hard to pull that as scum; it dsnt only consist of actually considering the pr component (wich is harder by scum, since they know they rnt actually mean intended) but to base ur vote on a rly weak "excuse" and being consistent with it; on the town case the actual paranoia is what fuels it, similar tp how scums paranoia make them oversesitive to reactions. thats why i think its more townindicative than anything else.
sure, maybe it is possible to pull as scum; but it definetly is harder, and depends on multiple layers (identifiying possible pr hunt->fake paranoia->voting on that alone), so it naturally leans town.
I'd also add that there was nothing about my post which suggested fishing for a PR - as noted, it was simply a nod to the previous game we had shared. For what it's worth, if I was scum here I wouldn't bother fishing for PRs anyway. I played the last iteration of this setup and town managed to voluntarily spunk off all it's power roles on Day 1.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
You're right with the meta here, although that's not a good example of how I normally play as town. You're better off looking at Jigsaw Mafia (large theme) where I was engaged and focussed, and single-handedly cost us the game as de facto town leader, or Newbie 2009 where I was also engaged and focussed, and although my reads weren't perfect, I did help us win that game by being more of a pest than a leader. It's basically NAI, and more a function of how invested I am in the game.In post 376, Doctor Drew wrote:I mean, I can't argue that.
On the surface I like BM for town, but he seems a little more focused and less wack a doo than a previous game we had, where he was town(and I was 3p haha). I will have to skim his iso from that game, I probably just don't have enough experience with him.
People seem to be coming around as Tux as town, but I dunno. I do get a vibe that is pocketing me and I can't shake it.
On Tux, I'm decidedly neutral. Nothing about his ISO really pinged me, so nothing to interest me there currently. Nothing wrong with a pocketing on Day 1, my dude!Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Yes, due to coronavirus, we do have spaces open for this year's intake. You'll need to sit an entrance exam, but from what I've seen so far, you should be fine with this.In post 377, superbowl9 wrote:Hehe it's content time boys and girls
Big townread on Deimos for stuff like 234
I'm thinking a lil fos on word is developing? Cases on ppl seemed a bit reachy for me (222 + 225) ((edit: add 351 lol))(((also jesus christ the block paragraphs with typos are hard to read)))
100000% agree with BM's 335 - do you have any slots open in that scumhunting school?
Cause of this VOTE: Marashu
Can someone who townreads votato give me a reason why (Drew, Marashu, Tuxedo)?
Also this game is a lot funnier than I first thought it was we have assembled a cast of interesting charactersShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
In post 390, superbowl9 wrote:
Why are you still taking this seriously?In post 389, ceejayvinoya wrote:
I've played with him before. It's just that I have a null town read on him and would rather someone else get lynched.In post 323, Battle Mage wrote:
I see you haven't played with votato beforeIn post 320, ceejayvinoya wrote:
I see no good reason to do this.In post 319, Battle Mage wrote:an opportunity arises - we have 3 days to lynch Votato before he returns from V/LA. assuming piss shows up beforehand.
The laughing emoji wasn't a clue? or the fact I was suggesting we lynch someone while they are V/LA and can't defend themselves? Come on man...In post 391, ceejayvinoya wrote:Huh. You mean I'm not supposed to? That's interesting.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Definitely bad feels about how the Marashu wagon got to -1, and then fell away.
I'm not sure about this progression, Mr Ikishima:
In post 386, Midari Ikishima wrote:People be lurking.
People be V/LA
People town read Demios and Votato I think.
Marashu is scum.
VOTE: Marashu
It's self explanatoryIn post 402, Midari Ikishima wrote:
I didn't see the hidden vote from WorchestIn post 396, word321 wrote:L-1
Honestly how long are you going to waffle and not put any thoughts down.
VOTE: Worch
It's getting to a point where you are just coasting thru it feels.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
In post 430, votato wrote:Well it implies that i make for an easy (mis)lynch. Ive only been lynched on two occasions where i cared about the game, and two further where i didnt care much and thought town would do just as well without me. Ive only ever been lynched as scum one time, and in that instance my scumbuddies faked a guilty on me. Essentially, if im invested in a game im probably not the lynch. And if im not investe
This was really just a roundabout way of saying "please don't lynch me, regardless of how I play"?In post 431, votato wrote:whoops. If im not invested im probably townShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
don't understand this 'defence'. You voted Marashu, putting him at L-1 (although later claimed you didn't realise this), and then after getting some heat, you jump immediately onto somebody else who had also been voting Marashu, without an especially good explanation.
In post 416, Midari Ikishima wrote:
#1. Its Miss.In post 411, Battle Mage wrote:Definitely bad feels about how the Marashu wagon got to -1, and then fell away.
I'm not sure about this progression, Mr Ikishima:
In post 386, Midari Ikishima wrote:People be lurking.
People be V/LA
People town read Demios and Votato I think.
Marashu is scum.
VOTE: Marashu
It's self explanatoryIn post 402, Midari Ikishima wrote:
I didn't see the hidden vote from WorchestIn post 396, word321 wrote:L-1
Honestly how long are you going to waffle and not put any thoughts down.
VOTE: Worch
It's getting to a point where you are just coasting thru it feels.
#2. Looking at Mara's ISO that I believe you posted is just bad and even in my tl;dr the faux scumhunting and being called for parroting someones reads in a previous game. Its a bit obvious.
#3. I'm blind I only have one eye. (Seriously I'm half blind I feel a lot of times.)
#4. This I wanted 4 points so here we are.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
no i'm just so aloneIn post 435, Deimos27 wrote:
Battle Mage, were your 345 and 357 reaction tests to see how I'd respond to buddying?In post 407, Battle Mage wrote:Originally I felt surely scum would be quite happy being buddied, and at least not try to 1v1 the guy doing it which seems counter-productive. But on reflection, it's quite an easy way to get into the game on the front foot by attacking them (and also being buddied might make them nervous of extra attention anyway).Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
It looks like he's implying Midari and Marashu are scum. If so, I can roll with that.In post 437, votato wrote:
You have no thoughts about who might be scum? None about who might be town?In post 436, Worcestershire wrote:
I don't remember seeing this type of episode before on any of the platforms I played and, particularly, unless you have a Nokia 6091, I find it difficult that an accidental post skip has occurred specifically in the L-1 scenario that Marashu was in. I would suspect, however, of your intentions if the set of votes had not stagnated.In post 415, Midari Ikishima wrote:
Phone Posting And I scrolled by it while my phone was in my hand. I'm sure you've never done that before?In post 413, Worcestershire wrote:In post 402, Midari Ikishima wrote:
I didn't see the hidden vote from WorchestIn post 396, word321 wrote:L-1
Honestly how long are you going to waffle and not put any thoughts down.
VOTE: Worch
It's getting to a point where you are just coasting thru it feels.
How did you not see my vote ?
Oh nevermind this is your second game or something.
Also when are you going to add something of substance? Or are we just going to coast thru? Like I said parroting people is not going to get us anywhere.
Best vote of the game. This game has way too many lurkers.
Regarding my participation in the game, I have nothing relevant to share and I do not intend to invent anything to create the false impression of activity.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
jokes aside, no they weren't mainly a test (although I'm always keen-eyed for reactions), they were mainly just me legit buddying to try and form a little town-bloc to work with, so we can cruise to victory.In post 438, Battle Mage wrote:
no i'm just so aloneIn post 435, Deimos27 wrote:
Battle Mage, were your 345 and 357 reaction tests to see how I'd respond to buddying?In post 407, Battle Mage wrote:Originally I felt surely scum would be quite happy being buddied, and at least not try to 1v1 the guy doing it which seems counter-productive. But on reflection, it's quite an easy way to get into the game on the front foot by attacking them (and also being buddied might make them nervous of extra attention anyway).Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Oi, I'm good enough as scum to convincingly fake being town! As I have plenty of meta on myself, I would offer you that my range as scum can be wide, although this is more characteristic of my play as active town (especially recently when I have more to prove as town).In post 444, Deimos27 wrote:If anyone who has meta with him would like to contest that notion and assert that he is within his scum range still, I am all ears.
I would also note, for the record, that your read on me is correct, as I am town here.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
In post 445, Worcestershire wrote:I didn't understand the line about cognitive load.Cognitive load
Illustrative usage:If we can lynch Marashu or Midari in the next couple of pages, Battle Mage might blow his cognitive load.
Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
my current lynchpool would be: Marashu, Nash, Midari, Ceejay - probably in that order.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
It's most likely he graduated from the BM school of scumhunting - and is well qualified to judge both town and scum. No explanation needed methinks...In post 452, superbowl9 wrote:
Why?In post 442, Deimos27 wrote:I'm pretty convinced Battle Mage is town at this point.
Or alternatively, he's scum and he knows I'm town.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
an idea:
if we can make it through Day 1 without outting the hider, would it be sensible for everyone to claim a name they would target if they were the hider? this way if the hider dies without their target dying, we will likely have 1 confirmed scum? probably most helpful if we try and get a reasonable diverse spread of names too.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Scumpool:
piisirattional
Marashu
Midari Ikishima
ceejayvinoya
Townpool:
Deimos27
word321
superbowl9
Worcestershire
To be confirmed:
Tuxedo Mask
votato
Doctor Drew
brassheraldShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
that's definitely true - it's basically a conservative strategy which reduces top-end opportunity (hider actually going on a miracle run and winning town the game) but reduces bottom-end risk by making sure hider doesnt die night 1 or 2 and give us no info.In post 462, Deimos27 wrote:I don't immediately see any problems with hypoclaiming hider targets. They will become slowly outed by PoE due to not dying after visiting scum or the NK target, but I don't know how long we'd need the hider's identity to remain secret anyway.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
I think Word's plan is fine. If it's done in an effectively random order it's not manipulatable by scum (i.e. scum all choose to target each other, making them immune to the hider), which extends the shelf-life to maybe 2 nights rather than 1.In post 514, votato wrote:
im not suggesting we dont do anything to out the hider results postmortem. im just saying that the specific thing that word suggested was bad. the original plan was better imo.In post 511, Nash wrote:
Does this really come from the votato in 469? You do realise that having conftown is +EV?In post 507, votato wrote:
because random targeting limits the potential. we only have like 2-3 investigations. we should investigate the scummiest people.In post 505, word321 wrote:
why? he dies upon contact. how can that be nerfed? its literally unavoidable as scumIn post 500, votato wrote:and it completely nerfs the investigative power of the hider.
So we will use the player list in the OP to do it, but you will target the player ABOVE you, rather than below. (as everyone agrees I'm conftown, makes sense that I decide the order right?)
UNVOTE: VOTE: Midari criticising the plan which is clearly in interest of town, on top of everything else.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
There's no need to be rude. You're simply wrong here, and with the greatest respect, I have more recent experience of this setup than you do, and am well placed to advise on strategy. I can be wrong of course, or indeed I could be scum trying to manipulate the town (although it's quite apparent above that you know that's not a possibility) but to call me an I'm an idiot when I highlight your error is not a good look.In post 531, Midari Ikishima wrote:
Reeeee you don't like the plan you are anti town. I give a situation where you create a false positive but you don't want to hear it? The density of the people in this game is bar none crazy. Instead of entertaining the idea of ANY OTHER PLAN we just have to use a semi random order and not use logic with THIS GTFO.In post 527, Battle Mage wrote:criticising the plan which is clearly in interest of town, on top of everything else.
This is illogical for numerous reasons. And don't tell me "the mafia will target each other"
Answer me your after rubbing your two brain cells together.
How many PRs are in the game?
So directing one on a suicide mission is the way to go? Get out.
The false positive argument you made is predicated on the idea of a vigilante. Town should never have a vigilante in this setup, because the player should always choose tracker. As such, there should be no false positive issue. I had thought that was so obvious it didn't warrant mentioning, so apologies I wasn't clear enough at the outset.
Can you please point me to other games where you've had a similar unprompted meltdown as town when you've gone against the consensus and come under slight pressure?Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
On the contrary, you were well worth a tickle before going out on that limb, and I just needed that little something extra to win me over. I reckon scum could be worried about this plan and try to fight it with ill-considered rationale, as you have done. Resorting immediately to ad hominem is not going to persuade anyone.In post 532, Midari Ikishima wrote:This quickly is turning into let's get a midari wagon they must be scum since they don't like the plan.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
We're going to give the hider some cover, and make sure we know who they targetted in case they die, by everyone agreeing a target for tonight in the threadIn post 536, brassherald wrote:Yo, you guys posted alot this weekend and I don't feel like reading that much today between my hearings.
What is the plan that Midari doesn't like?only if they were the hider.
I got to choose the format as I'm the tippy top townie of the day. Everyone will target the person directly above them in the player list on the first page.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
exactly.In post 539, brassherald wrote:I guess Hider!pii replacement targets the bottom person so that we have an ouroboros of players?
now, how do you feel about riding on Midari for a bit? Just to see how she reacts?Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
no, for me it was mostly some dodgy voting patterns before that. Others have other reasons I'm sure.In post 541, brassherald wrote:Is it just because she doesn't want to follow the plan?Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
I looked at your topic list, read all of your completed games, and you were town in all of them.In post 545, Midari Ikishima wrote:
It's not. Keep trying.In post 535, Battle Mage wrote:Ah this is Midari's first game as scum!
If I missed one, you are welcome to prove me wrong by linking to it.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
You're an alt of somebody? I wonder if I could find out by looking at the banlist?In post 545, Midari Ikishima wrote:
Rude cause you can't think about something going against the grain for other reasons. K.In post 533, Battle Mage wrote:
There's no need to be rude. You're simply wrong here, and with the greatest respect, I have more recent experience of this setup than you do, and am well placed to advise on strategy. I can be wrong of course, or indeed I could be scum trying to manipulate the town (although it's quite apparent above that you know that's not a possibility) but to call me an I'm an idiot when I highlight your error is not a good look.In post 531, Midari Ikishima wrote:
Reeeee you don't like the plan you are anti town. I give a situation where you create a false positive but you don't want to hear it? The density of the people in this game is bar none crazy. Instead of entertaining the idea of ANY OTHER PLAN we just have to use a semi random order and not use logic with THIS GTFO.In post 527, Battle Mage wrote:criticising the plan which is clearly in interest of town, on top of everything else.
This is illogical for numerous reasons. And don't tell me "the mafia will target each other"
Answer me your after rubbing your two brain cells together.
How many PRs are in the game?
So directing one on a suicide mission is the way to go? Get out.
The false positive argument you made is predicated on the idea of a vigilante.Town should never have a vigilante in this setup, because the player should always choose tracker.As such, there should be no false positive issue. I had thought that was so obvious it didn't warrant mentioning, so apologies I wasn't clear enough at the outset.
Can you please point me to other games where you've had a similar unprompted meltdown as town when you've gone against the consensus and come under slight pressure?
I'm not outting myself and other accts to prove a theory.
The bottom line is, unless there is a legit newbie in this setup, there isn't going to be a vig, so it doesn't matter. And even if you think someone might be dumb enough to pick Vig over Tracker, the odds of that, multiplied by the odds of the hider hitting them vs scum, make your "false positive" an exceptionally remote possibility - much more remote than the likelihood that they hit scum on Night 1, and die without us getting anything from it because we don't know who they visited. It's just basic maths dude.
Your objection about the Vig makes even less sense because, it doesn't really affect the validity of the gameplan for the hider. The hider dies if they visit a vig, regardless of whether they claimed their target or not.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
We won't have a vigilante. This is one good reason why.In post 554, Worcestershire wrote:As I understand it, there are three possibilities:
1- Choose a mafia and die.
2- Choose a vigilante and die.
3- Choose a victim and die together if visited by mafia/vigilante.
The only problem is that in two of these three scenarios the vigilante distorts the expected result, which can lead to a misinterpretation of the facts, especially in possibility 2. If that could be adjusted, it would be a good plan.
Also, themostlikely possibility, and the one you've missed here, is that the hider hides behind town and lives, but doesn't claim. Then once they die, we potentially have a conftown late in the game, which would be hugely useful.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
I have suggested (Well, actually it wasn't my idea, but I endorsed and tweaked it) a solution to this - we all pick the person above us in the playerlist. that way, only 1 person picks each person.In post 555, Worcestershire wrote:
We could establish a variation of choice to avoid this.In post 458, superbowl9 wrote:Unless a lot of people choose the same person to hide behind, that's the only downside I can seeShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55% - Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage