Newbie 2016: Snapdragons (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Hey hey hey!
Good evening moons, I’m porkens. I like to lolhammer, memegambit, and fall scumteams day 1. My perfect date includes lying on the floor, playing Super Nintendo, and eating chips.
Fun fact: I skimmed this slot and was BLOWN AWAY to get a town PM.
Ill read if I have to but I’ll give a cookie to anyone who catches me up on the game state!!worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
This list is total crap and almost completely upside down.
Lucky
72o
Thirteen
Looker
Quick
JamSV
Clark
BM
Raya
About half the day I’m scumreading 72, although he started to pick up towards the end here. I don’t hate his thoughts on reya tbf.
Raya is townlean tho
Clark and jam are probtown
Bm and quick are probtown
Looker and thirteen are leanscum
72 has no votes? That’s rediculois. VOTE: 72worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
1. What is your experience in mafia outside of mafiascum? I play on epic mafia sometimes, started there. My pie is shit.
2. Do you prefer playing as town or scum? Town
3. What do you think of lynching lurkers? Depends on the particular flavor of lurking and gamestate
4. What do you think of lynching liars? Depends on the lie, and the liarworse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Hey looker,
I’m as caught up as I’m gunna be. I read through last night after my initial post and before my last.
No not omgus at all, like I said I thought this slot was scum too. I give a smaaaaaal amount of weight to the blooper avatar theory and you haven’t posted much for me to read you. So the needle hasn’t moved much.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
And why are you concerned about whether advocating that I full claim be viewed as town oriented?In post 537, Raya36 wrote:
Incase it's not as town oriented as I thinkIn post 532, Porkens wrote:Why do you want more input?worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Then why are you asking about 72’s cookie?In post 538, Raya36 wrote:
YesIn post 533, Porkens wrote:
Did you read my opening post?In post 531, Raya36 wrote:Why does 72 get a cookie?worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Oh , AND jam didn’t answer my question. Afraid that’s another demerit.In post 536, JamSV wrote:
A wild porkens appears. Just like in Juuni Taisen I reckon they should be the first one to be hammered (I am aware chronologically it wasn't boar but its the first we saw). I can predict with very high accuracy that when someone comes in and the first thing they say is "I like to lolhammer, and memegambit", that they're going to ruin the game. Not to mention "I skimmed this slot and was BLOWN AWAY to get a town BM" is utter BS LAMIST nonsense.In post 527, Porkens wrote:I’m not here to convince you that I’m town; I’m here to find the mafia
72 gets a cookie!
JamSV gets 1 demerit for his “healthy game” what does that even mean?
Once again my vote is no longer going to move.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
WOW, you’ve got quite a chip on your shoulder. Does that usually serve you well?In post 544, JamSV wrote:
Invalid due to inability to read. It's almost like what is in bold is the explanation. I'm not going to act like you're stupid enough to not understand it, but I'll just play along for now. It's almost as if, lolhammering and memegambits ruin games, would prevent the game being a "healthy game". I quoted your post not because of you saying you don't want to convince us that you're town, nor because 72 gets a cookie. So I wonder what part of your post, my post referred to. If one with 12 years of experience more than I have, can't link 2 posts together, then I'm thoroughly disappointed, unless if its out of sheer arrogance, which would disappoint me for different reasons.In post 542, Porkens wrote:
Oh , AND jam didn’t answer my question. Afraid that’s another demerit.In post 536, JamSV wrote:
A wild porkens appears. Just like in Juuni Taisen I reckon they should be the first one to be hammered (I am aware chronologically it wasn't boar but its the first we saw).In post 527, Porkens wrote:I’m not here to convince you that I’m town; I’m here to find the mafia
72 gets a cookie!
JamSV gets 1 demerit for his “healthy game” what does that even mean?I can predict with very high accuracy that when someone comes in and the first thing they say is "I like to lolhammer, and memegambit", that they're going to ruin the game.Not to mention "I skimmed this slot and was BLOWN AWAY to get a town BM" is utter BS LAMIST nonsense.
Once again my vote is no longer going to move.
If you intend on having a toxic attitude and ruining the game, there's very little I tell you to do, I was 6 yo when you joined the site, I can't see someone under 12 playing mafia either. Feel free to piece together the relevance of that.
PS - this part is for Clark. If you didn't like playing with Menalque, I have some bad news for you unfortunately.
Your explanation re: a healthy game went sailing right over my head, but now that you point it out, I get’cha.
Like this is so overboard aggressive I’m going to have to issue another demerit.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Okedoke. Do YOU think it would hurt town?In post 545, Raya36 wrote:
I'm not concerned about it being viewed as town oriented. I'm concerned that getting you to full claim is a mistake that will hurt townIn post 540, Porkens wrote:
And why are you concerned about whether advocating that I full claim be viewed as town oriented?In post 537, Raya36 wrote:
Incase it's not as town oriented as I thinkIn post 532, Porkens wrote:Why do you want more input?worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Actually, don’t answer that.In post 552, Porkens wrote:
Okedoke. Do YOU think it would hurt town?In post 545, Raya36 wrote:
I'm not concerned about it being viewed as town oriented. I'm concerned that getting you to full claim is a mistake that will hurt townIn post 540, Porkens wrote:
And why are you concerned about whether advocating that I full claim be viewed as town oriented?In post 537, Raya36 wrote:
Incase it's not as town oriented as I thinkIn post 532, Porkens wrote:Why do you want more input?worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Ah! Flattery will get you everywhere how can I not answer?In post 554, ClarkBar wrote:Porkens, you are welcome to claim if you'd like. Did you address your predecessor's false claim? What's your opinion on that? Out of curiosity. I was still in the womb when you joined this site, so your insights are like gold to me.
I don’t....think I’m going to claim. Unless someone can present a strong protown case for me to do so.
And I’m not acknowledging whether it was a false claim or not.
I will say that LLs decision regarding his claim was a bad decision.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
If conversation grinds to a halt and no movement is possible or likely then fine end the day.In post 557, ClarkBar wrote:
It's all circumstantial of course. It seems logical that the longer a day goes on more information becomes available and better choices are made. On the other hand, if a slot is scummy then ending the day is the best choice. Why let things drag on?In post 555, Porkens wrote:Clark do you subscribe to the idea that shorter days are better for town?
On the other hand, if there is activity and players are engaging, it only benefits the town to go on. They groundwork we do now will be fertile with associations and other information in later days.
This slot is scumread, and so scum want it to be hammered as soon as possible. They are desperate for me not to turn this wagon around. If I am hung I will flip town, and that will be the assumed motivation. so anyone who does hammer now is going to be suspect.
In short: don’t rush.
P. Edit oh lol I’m not even at H-1worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Last question first; I believed you then thought LL was scummy.
Ok THAT post yes I skimmed that one quite liberally.
Your scumread of LL was based on his claim and attitude change around that same time. I like how you analyze bot the scum and town motivations and they don’t seem too far off. Let me ask you this about it though:
You said essentially that “As scum or town, LL claimed one order to “Shake off attention.” Can you explain how claiming a PR diverts attention away from oneself?worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
I’m not going to spend any time or energy trying to defend LL’s play, evaluate his ISO, or trying to make a towncase of it. Like I saidi thought he was scum. His decisions were his, and they were bad.
My job here is not to avoid getting hanged. It’s to help the town get information.
Re: your answer. I’m going to be pedantic here and ask you in a different way: in a vacuum, do you think claiming a PR shakes attention away from the claimant?worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
In post 576, ClarkBar wrote:
How your slot flips will inform a lot of my thinking. I suspect 72 due to his position on LL's dick, where his votes have gone and why, and how he reacted to the claim by LL. Plus his lack of scum hunting. So why am I not voting for 72? Because I'm much less sure about him than you, and if you flip town then I would be forced to really re-evaluate my read on him.In post 573, Porkens wrote:Let’s go at this in another way. What are your current thoughts on the counterwagons?
I have a null read on Raya. I iso'd her and stuff, so you can go check that out at your leisure. In short I didn't like her push on LL at first, but she explained her reasoning well enough. LL said my change of heart with Raya occurred "magically" but I gave post links. If you flip scum then she would essentially be a town lock for me. If you flip town than I would look at that early push I didn't like again and follow up more with her.
I guess I give myself a B-.In post 575, ClarkBar wrote:In post 572, Porkens wrote:
My job here is not to avoid getting hanged. It’s to help the town get information.
And how would you say you've accomplished this since you've replaced in?
I was actually asking about the voters on those wagons rather than the targets of the wagons. Do you have any thoughts on 13/72 wagon on Raya or LQ/P wagon on 72?In post 576, ClarkBar wrote:
How your slot flips will inform a lot of my thinking. I suspect 72 due to his position on LL's dick, where his votes have gone and why, and how he reacted to the claim by LL. Plus his lack of scum hunting. So why am I not voting for 72? Because I'm much less sure about him than you, and if you flip town then I would be forced to really re-evaluate my read on him.In post 573, Porkens wrote:Let’s go at this in another way. What are your current thoughts on the counterwagons?
I have a null read on Raya. I iso'd her and stuff, so you can go check that out at your leisure. In short I didn't like her push on LL at first, but she explained her reasoning well enough. LL said my change of heart with Raya occurred "magically" but I gave post links. If you flip scum then she would essentially be a town lock for me. If you flip town than I would look at that early push I didn't like again and follow up more with her.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
So which is more likely: LL town or 72 scum?In post 595, TheThirteenthJT wrote:In post 591, Porkens wrote:Thirteenth, what would my hanging tell us about the game?
I've been looking at vote counts throughout the game. Jamsv has been the most firm on the LL wagon. Hasn't waivered from their stance. Raya agrees with LL early game on Blopp and then distanced by voting LL as the wagon started turning. Lickety was also pushing hard on LL and dropped a bit after the pr claim. Even with LL backtracking and dropping they have not returned to that wagon. Waiting on them now to further analyze. Meanwhile counterwagon was 72 who agreed with LL. An LL flip would be the strongest indicator of 72 this game. I am almost certain if LL is town than 72 is scum here. Does not work vice versa. Clark on your wagon just now felt extremely oppurtunistic, again more detail coming.
There's so much to learn from your flip.
And I don't want to give 100% away the tell (you can however meta me to find it.) But it's related to one of my (borrowed) rqs question and Clark gave a result with 100% scum rate. Obviously tools like that are just tools so Ive been trying to watch their game independently from it. If they flip scum that tool will be great for future games and if not Clark becomes the exception.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
I just want BM to keep an open mind as he reads through the game so that it’s not all wasted tunneling me. He’s got fresh eyes and I want him to be at least considering the idea that LL was town when he did all that crap.In post 597, JamSV wrote:
I thought, you didn't want to make us think you were town and that you were just here to scum hunt. This post seems like you've changed your mind.In post 594, Porkens wrote:Wrong tree BM, just letting you know work on a backup caseworse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
That’s not a joke...In post 639, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I lol'd and am TRing you for this joke.In post 637, Looker wrote:You're fuckin twelve years old?worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
I remember some one saying something about benefit of the doubt something somethingIn post 640, ClarkBar wrote:Well shit, If I had remembered 467 I would have brought it up! There you go, that was my frame of mind. Looks like I followed through on what I said to boot.
So your issue is that I don't think that Porkens can effectively defend LL's actions? She has said so herself. Just because there is a replacement does not mean the slot is given a clean slate.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
There is.In post 648, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I thought there was an age restriction for this site?In post 644, Porkens wrote:Nobody tell him.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
What a total asshat, Jesus Christ.In post 95, LuckyLuciano wrote:
Thank you for your contribution to the game. Come back when you want to push the game forward.In post 94, Homura wrote:I don't have one. Just think you're reading too much into something that could have a non-game-related reason for occurring.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Cause this is trash.In post 137, 72offsuit wrote:23 - dat smiley face --- bad overly friendly/buddy-buddy vibe.
LAMIST - "Lets move out of RVS" with 0 game-related contentworse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
This after brushing off questions about early page readsIn post 163, 72offsuit wrote:
No. Why do you ask?In post 148, Raya36 wrote:
Have your thoughts on Blopp changed at all?In post 137, 72offsuit wrote:23 - dat smiley face --- bad overly friendly/buddy-buddy vibe.
LAMIST - "Lets move out of RVS" with 0 game-related contentworse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
This is a good post.In post 196, JamSV wrote:
72's case on Blopp: Agreeing with Lucky. 26In post 188, 72offsuit wrote:In post 184, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
Valid point but obviously he had multiple leans. Do you feel they were forced 72? Like he felt pressured to answer so he did?In post 140, 72offsuit wrote:
It's page 3. What are you expecting?In post 68, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
Is he your only scumlean or do you have more?In post 67, Raya36 wrote:UNVOTE:
I don't want a quick hammer. L-2 is plenty for pressure. Scumlean on Lucky for not removing his vote. Could be hoping for that quickhammer
Yes. Names 2 and a half scumleans in 69 feels like a blurted out response.
By 181 Raya has 4 townleans/reads, which feels like way too many from a town PoV at this stage of the game.
The Homura townread is the sort of read I make as scum on my scumbuddy. "Similar thoughts to myself" --> its the sort of statement, which you cant really test the veracity of.
Dumps me in as a null, still doesnt explain how my actions further scum agenda, or why someone of a scum mindset makes aforementioned plays.
If genuinely believes that my RQS is active lurking filler, then why am I not a scumread?
If I was to take a stab at the game solve, I would say Raya + Homura purely off that reads list.
Now take a look at what I made bold in his quote. Huh. Spooky coincidence.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
I’ll take that as a yes. Tell me what you think of this readslist:
Looker replaced Homura: Lurky as fuck. How can I read this?
Battle Mage replaced Blopp: bloop was zero entity, BM is just filling space
72offsuit: scummy as shit, should be lynched today
JamSV replaced individual: arrogant annoying but town
TheThirteenthJT: ehhhh town I guess talks a lot isn’t obviously bad
ClarkBar: town ish I guess
LicketyQuickety (SE) replaced EchoVision: durrrr not too much scumtelling but I dunno
Raya36 (SE) : kinda sheepy? Leaaaaaaanscum
Porkens (SE) replaced LuckyLuciano: total town hero
P. Edit beetlejuice!
Why did you vote for bloop?worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Lol no that dude is going to ride my wagon right off the cliff I’m not even going to try to convince himIn post 680, ClarkBar wrote:Trying to add a little butter to the Jam eh? If you compliment his "tone" then he's sure to unvote you.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
“Like”. What even is this post?In post 244, 72offsuit wrote:
Ye, pretty much this ^In post 242, TheThirteenthJT wrote:I went back to analyze the Blopp flake and it's so bizarre. I can see newbie players leaving for a bit and returning to see 4 votes on then as a bit overwhelming but I felt the pressure up to the point they removed their avatar was not that high. I've seen (and done so myself) people drilled early game as newbies which would cause enough frustration for a rage quit. This early wagon was rather tame. But at the same time why return at all to remove your avatar? Clearly no intention of returning and thus rage quit possibility over just not returning/forgetting about the site.
So here's the final scenario I have in my head. Blopp comes back because they remember they are in a mafia game, see 4 votes on them, says screw this, removes avatar and leaves forever.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Show me where you considered yourself scumhunting?In post 686, 72offsuit wrote:
Lack of scumhunting? Lol...In post 576, ClarkBar wrote:
How your slot flips will inform a lot of my thinking. I suspect 72 due to his position on LL's dick, where his votes have gone and why, and how he reacted to the claim by LL. Plus his lack of scum hunting. So why am I not voting for 72? Because I'm much less sure about him than you, and if you flip town then I would be forced to really re-evaluate my read on him.In post 573, Porkens wrote:Let’s go at this in another way. What are your current thoughts on the counterwagons?
I have a null read on Raya. I iso'd her and stuff, so you can go check that out at your leisure. In short I didn't like her push on LL at first, but she explained her reasoning well enough. LL said my change of heart with Raya occurred "magically" but I gave post links. If you flip scum then she would essentially be a town lock for me. If you flip town than I would look at that early push I didn't like again and follow up more with her.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
You think those were scummy? Why?In post 692, ClarkBar wrote:I can't follow the BM vote. I hated the entrance to the game. I hated the music video posts. I hated using meta as a push against LL and 72 (I know those are my top cum reads) but whatever. I guess it's not one thing. But I'm not moving off you.
P.edit no that was to 72worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
In post 278, LuckyLuciano wrote:If I'm not mistaking, that's 4 votes. I have a TPR. Let's move on.
Oh that ROLEFISHING thoIn post 290, LicketyQuickety wrote:Like, if you are mason with 72, just say so. If you are that would make sense. But it's not really my fault I caught 72 lying about your meta and thought he was Scum for it.
Anyways, if you ARE masons with 72, which I would say is about 50/50 at this point, then I would look at Raya36 for the blatant buddy attempt as well as Thirteen for them affirming LL's meta and budying me. I DON'T think Blopp flaking is actually AI.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
In post 278, LuckyLuciano wrote:If I'm not mistaking, that's 4 votes. I have a TPR. Let's move on.In post 290, LicketyQuickety wrote:Like, if you are mason with 72, just say so. If you are that would make sense. But it's not really my fault I caught 72 lying about your meta and thought he was Scum for it.
Anyways, if you ARE masons with 72, which I would say is about 50/50 at this point, then I would look at Raya36 for the blatant buddy attempt as well as Thirteen for them affirming LL's meta and budying me. I DON'T think Blopp flaking is actually AI.
I don’t understand this progression at allIn post 284, LicketyQuickety wrote:
No, I'm claiming my case is rock solid and you claiming PR doesn't dissuade me at all given that is exactly what you would do if you were Scum. Like, what is my incentive to believe you are telling the truth about being TPR?In post 282, LuckyLuciano wrote:So you are advocating eliminating a claimed power role day 1 when, in claiming, my slot because self-resolving as the game goes on anyway?worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
I’m not at all sure what you are trying to convince me of hereIn post 696, 72offsuit wrote:
Porkens.In post 606, Porkens wrote:It just boggles my mind that LL ended up claiming based on a scumread of three posts.
Read into the relationship between LL and Quick.
LL replaced oit of the previous game he was involved with quick. It was clear to me he was cbf with this game.
LL is not a rage quitter. He is also not a sore loser. I dont see !scumLL replacing out and screwing over his replcement with his fake claim.worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
This postIn post 344, ClarkBar wrote:Hi BM!
Again I want to say how sorry I am for letting myself almost get replaced. I was whiny in the beginning of the game about the slow place, and so of course it would be me to then contribute to the problem. I work on weekends, and with the holiday and some other life stuff I got completely wrecked. I do virtually nothing during the week, so my posting will be a lot more consistent.
I'll say this regarding much of what I've read in the last few pages: I am not going to go read a past game to see how players behaved in it. I have said (and still believe) that behavior/activity levels being different in one game to another is something I think is noteworthy and could be AI. So I'm not dismissing that as a reasonable motive to vote for somebody. But, unless something very clear is brought to my attention then I don't think I'm going to hop on a wagon because of meta.
I don't have a problem with LL's reasoning for voting Blopp even if it is kind of a reach. I can follow the reasoning and don't necessarily disagree. I do fear quick hammers, but that fear shouldn't stop a player from having some L-1 pressure. I also buy LL's claim for now. I feel uncomfortable giving town-reads, but LL is a town lean for me.
My vote on Homura stands and I guess we'll see if there is a replacement or if Homura returns. Obviously I can't point any fingers regarding activity levels, but it's the lack of trying to engage other players in a meaningful way that bothers me. Half-heartedly sharing opinions and having only one vote that was in the RVS and not even a random reason given bugs me.
I'll keep looking at stuff and see if I can't get some questions goings. I'm also happy to answer any questions, in fact that might help me in figuring out my own feelings on some things.
Is a very scummy postworse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
In post 367, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
So you believe LLs claim but he is only a town lean?In post 344, ClarkBar wrote:Hi BM!
Again I want to say how sorry I am for letting myself almost get replaced. I was whiny in the beginning of the game about the slow place, and so of course it would be me to then contribute to the problem. I work on weekends, and with the holiday and some other life stuff I got completely wrecked. I do virtually nothing during the week, so my posting will be a lot more consistent.
I'll say this regarding much of what I've read in the last few pages: I am not going to go read a past game to see how players behaved in it. I have said (and still believe) that behavior/activity levels being different in one game to another is something I think is noteworthy and could be AI. So I'm not dismissing that as a reasonable motive to vote for somebody. But, unless something very clear is brought to my attention then I don't think I'm going to hop on a wagon because of meta.
I don't have a problem with LL's reasoning for voting Blopp even if it is kind of a reach. I can follow the reasoning and don't necessarily disagree. I do fear quick hammers, but that fear shouldn't stop a player from having some L-1 pressure. I also buy LL's claim for now. I feel uncomfortable giving town-reads, but LL is a town lean for me.
My vote on Homura stands and I guess we'll see if there is a replacement or if Homura returns. Obviously I can't point any fingers regarding activity levels, but it's the lack of trying to engage other players in a meaningful way that bothers me. Half-heartedly sharing opinions and having only one vote that was in the RVS and not even a random reason given bugs me.
I'll keep looking at stuff and see if I can't get some questions goings. I'm also happy to answer any questions, in fact that might help me in figuring out my own feelings on some things.
And I agree on your Homura point but it's not strong enough for it to be my leading case. Could you ISo Raya and let me know how you feel about them.
This is a for fun question and part of my experimental ways of playing.(I know we are out of rqs and wifom and not aftual scumhunting blah blah blah. Just let me be me.) If you were town who is your scum team at this point, and if you were mafia who would your partner be? Please answer both sides and just have fun with the answers. I don't have any day to back anything up but I have theories so this will help me improve as a player. Anyone else is free to answer this as well.
This is a good post about a bad post!worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
That’s not what you said here.In post 26, 72offsuit wrote:
Agreed.In post 25, LuckyLuciano wrote:He's mafia, my vote is no longer random.
VOTE: Bloppworse than random - Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens
- Porkens