Open 789: Two-Fold 2d3 [Game Over]
Forum rules
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Do you want me to answer this?In post 12, dramonic wrote:And you need to know this because...?- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 298, Dannflor wrote:btw Dunnstral is posting elsewhere on site that's not here sooooo that's also a good wagon
Really lame take- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
This is almost always wrong/bad/scummy reasoningIn post 340, dramonic wrote:SPAMMING THE NEWB CARD TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM POTENTIAL MISTAKE
In fact I don't find the rest of your reasons in this post to be much better.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Let's say yesIn post 348, Menalque wrote:@dunny are you caught up?- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 370, teacher wrote:Honestly I kinda like Dramonic. They are at least producing content/providing reasoning behind reads (hey, Hiraki, any time you want to hit up 295 that would be grand). While I disagree with their takes, I can see the reasoning and I like the different perspective. I also dont really feel like they're misrepping.
You're so closeIn post 372, teacher wrote: 1. Multiball dynamics matter because scum do want to scumhunt, just the other team.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Actually there's a lack of critical thinking here, I think they threw out the read because they felt they had toIn post 479, Dunnstral wrote:In post 370, teacher wrote:Honestly I kinda like Dramonic. They are at least producing content/providing reasoning behind reads (hey, Hiraki, any time you want to hit up 295 that would be grand). While I disagree with their takes, I can see the reasoning and I like the different perspective. I also dont really feel like they're misrepping.
You're so closeIn post 372, teacher wrote: 1. Multiball dynamics matter because scum do want to scumhunt, just the other team.
VOTE: teacher- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Scummy list to be quite honest.In post 564, Menalque wrote:Dann, teacher
Umlaut, testa, dram
Triple, marashu
A50
Gypx, dunn
Gamma
Hiraki- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Trying to place everyone into super organized tiers this early in the gameIn post 582, Menalque wrote:Why?
And what is it based on?
And I'm in the final 4 along with gypyx who is probably an inactive player, and you're likely towning a bunch of scum.
Teacher isn't even attempting to veil his omgus vote above, no pretenses and no explanations- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
niceIn post 598, Menalque wrote:if I am towning scum, then I'll realise that if and when my scum reads flip town- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Sure, I plan on talking more as the game continues to existIn post 625, Hiraki wrote:Yeah Dunn imma need a little more from you- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
idk, feelin' kinda cute, might read the thread soonIn post 768, Bell wrote:@dunstral, what ya doin?- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 482, Dunnstral wrote:
Actually there's a lack of critical thinking here, I think they threw out the read because they felt they had toIn post 479, Dunnstral wrote:In post 370, teacher wrote:Honestly I kinda like Dramonic. They are at least producing content/providing reasoning behind reads (hey, Hiraki, any time you want to hit up 295 that would be grand). While I disagree with their takes, I can see the reasoning and I like the different perspective. I also dont really feel like they're misrepping.
You're so closeIn post 372, teacher wrote: 1. Multiball dynamics matter because scum do want to scumhunt, just the other team.
VOTE: teacher- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
vote for someone you think is scumIn post 867, Menalque wrote:I also don’t think teacher is scum- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
VOTE: MenalqueIn post 943, Menalque wrote:Because teacher is hoping that more votes on dunn will prompt dunn to actually play the game
Not going to play around this game, anybody who participates in bad faith pushes get eliminated- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Not sure what this argument is supposed to be? Can you argue that you're not a sinner or a werewolf instead of saying the other team is pushing youIn post 1200, Jake The Wolfie wrote:"Even if I were either a Sinner or a Werewolf, why wouldn't the other team ote me? It would reflect grandly on them, no?"- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Why would we vote out penguin?In post 1224, Gamma Emerald wrote:That would also happen if you voted out Penguin :susseyes:- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
You're going to need to prove a positive rather than waiting for someone to prove a negative when trying to eliminate someone
Saying "why not eliminate x" isn't how things really work- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
okIn post 1274, Dannflor wrote:Dramonic, Hiraki,
I think there's a good chance you're both town, at least one of you believes I might be town,
let's real talk.
I think you guys need to pull your heads out of your asses and realize that just because you haven't gotten along with Menalque in this game specifically doesn't mean he isn't town. And at this point refusing to reevaluate him is extremely anti-town.
First of all, it is extremely rare (particularly in the site's current meta) for scum to top post in a game. What's even rarer is for that top poster to have OVER DOUBLE the next poster's total post count. Menalque has more posts than Dramonic and Hiraki COMBINED. The last scum player I saw who could maintain that type of presence was RadiantCowbells.
But okay, you might say, Menalque has posted a lot of fluff. Or he's posting a lot because he's been caught since page 3 and he's flailing. Let's ignore his mild temper tantrum from the last few pages that he absolutely never throws as scum because all it accomplishes is destroying his own credibility. Let's ignore the fact that his frustration with the game reads extremely genuine and it's backed up by 300+ posts of earnest solving that no one in this game approaches. I say we should ignore it because even though the AtE here (not all AtE is scum) SHOULD be confirming Menalque is town to you, you're going to brush it off as "lul he's frustrated scum who got caught."
Why isn't he frustrated scum who just got caught? Consider the fact that he's continually tried to question both of you to get a better read on your alignments despite the fact that the majority of your responses have been "lul caught scum." Unless he thinks he can pocket you, he has very little reason to do this as scum versus primarily appealing to the crowd. But, even despite dramonic being like a brick wall to talk to, Menalque has evolved his scum read on dramonic from early in the game to a town read. That's not something that furthers his win condition as scum. Continuing to try to engage with you fruitlessly is also a hallmark of town desperation, not scum desperation. Neither of you carry the influence in this game that your confidence suggests, scum!Menalque does not need to be afraid of you or appease you in anyway. Menalque has consistently tried to get some kind of good faith engagement going with both of you.
The popular theory, from dramonic at least, I think is that Menalque and TH/Jake are teamed. I can tell you right now that giving up with a lot of AtE and exasperatingly voting Jake is not how scum busses. Just via the amount of posting Menalque has done this game you can tell he cares a lot. If he's scum and realizes his partner is going down, he's going to bus for cred. What he's doing now actively strips his credibility no matter what.
And then like, his focus hasn't even entirely been on you guys. Actually contrary to both of you, who seem to have very few reads... Hiraki is actually better in this regard, dramonic just seems to focus on his scum team. Menalque has from the start of the game tried to make sense of the entire player list. Go into his ISO and look specifically at his read trajectory on Gamma, try to step into his shoes for a moment and realize, wow, that's a towny trajectory that actually makes a lot of sense even if you don't agree with it. Even this late into D1, he's constantly returning to slots like Gypx or Marashu and reevaluating. Slots that have barely posted enough to be reevaluated. It's a level of effort that is A. not needed or optimal from scum!Menalque and B. just more likely to come from town earnestly wanting to solve the game.
I'm writing all of this because I think it's actually fairly probable that you could both be town. But I'm not sure. One of the major sticking points for me with both of your slots (more dramonic than you Hiraki, to be fair) is your continued insistence that Menalque is this open-wolf scum to the point that you seem to refuse to reevaluate at all. I'm not sure if it's scummy because I've seen far more frustrating plays from town before, but it sure as hell is anti-town.
It's exacerbated by the fact that your reads don't seem to have progressed in 40 pages. I don't get the sense you're really reading Menalque's post or absorbing new information and assimilating that with the reads you decided on page 10.
I don't know, just be a little transparent here? Talk to me? Even if you think I'm scum? Or both of us are scum?
VOTE: teacher- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
When did I say that?In post 1401, Bell wrote:He said he would catch up in the game and he really isn't- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 1482, Dunnstral wrote:Maybe we can elim scum nowguess not
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I did not see them.In post 1756, PenguinPower wrote:Can’t be bothered to answer questions or....do much of anything can you?
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Maybe? My opinion on them is pretty neutralIn post 1772, Dannflor wrote:VOTE: Marashu
iirc last time I tried this Bell wouldn't vote there and then anyone else off the Jake wagon only wanted to push their own vanity wagons
The scum teams only have 2 people eachIn post 1735, teacher wrote:Apologies to keep flipping myself, but Im not comfortable with what is basically a 9-3 consensus lynch,
BAD REASONING. I'll call it out every time I see it.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
There is no "chain investigations", seer can't find mafiaIn post 1853, teacher wrote:Unvote please.
At 8:1:1 that is soon to become 7:1, massclaim might help given the sheer number of PRs — we can list out all the clears and chain investigations so that it becomes true auto.
I love that Bell can’t counterclaim, despite softing a PR o day start.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Last mafia is probably in Penguin/Gamma/Teacher/Chemist. It can likely be narrowed down further from pr claims and actions tomorrow
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Of those, Chemist/Teacher both basically said 'whatever' and voted jake at the last moment, while Penguin was actively campaigning for anybody else he could convince. Gamma did a bit where he asked someone why they thought jake was town, then a few posts later said they were considering lobbying against the wagon, but after reading decided against it. Kind of weird progression- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Bell, but I was roleblockedIn post 2142, dramonic wrote:@Dunn: so who WAS your investigation - Dunnstral
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral