Newbie 2025 | Lilies | Game Over
Forum rules
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
It's hard to believe that the internet has been available in homes for over 19 years already. The dot-com bubble exploded and hatched a new internet like a phoenix.
I really hope Mush's last name is Fraudulence.
NAI but I just wanted to say thank you for this expression of solidarity in your relationship.In post 11, Frogsterking wrote:I have to run to Target now to pick up some dish scrapers bfore i can do the dishes. My GF is in a bad mood today.
I like this post because it's the first one that breaks from RVS.In post 30, Tatsuya Kaname wrote:Uhhh can you please try to steer away from using that as a reason? While we're still in RVS (or are we?), I find that reason to always be poor and/or scum-indicative.
Ugh.In post 31, Redados wrote:Good point! MUSHSHAGANA voted for me. I am town. Therefore, Mush must be scum. Therefore, I vote for Mush. Facts. Logic. No emotional reaction whatsoever on my part.
This post made me actually check who was alive and dead because I hoped I wouldn't have to read into this mischievous attitude.
Looks like I won't find out about MESH's middle name.
That is so freaking cool!In post 36, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:My username is Sumerian using a very basic transliteration scheme. Under the standard scheme, it's muš-šag-ana, "Something In The Heart Of Empty Space", literally "'empty space'-'inside, at the heart of'-'What?'"
You can think of it as a rough translation of the sentence "There's something out there in the void." Sumerian is agglutinative, so it makes a single word for simple phrases like that. It's not a reference to anything, it's one of a short list of "names" of my own design that I am fond of.
I take back everything I said.In post 36, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I can't use mixedCase naming conventions anymore, because Homestuck ruined them.
Can the living players be quotable please?
Confidence. I like it.In post 40, Redados wrote:
I'm not going to apologize for goofing around in RVS.In post 38, shellyc wrote:I am trying to generate information from the questioning. So you think that's a problem.
Something I want to point out is how Redados is scummy to me.
He started with LAMIST (saying it's cryptography), turns the thread into the general discussion forum, then votes with the reason of OMGUS. I would like to hear more from you, because I don't like how you are playing - a different vibe from your last towngame.
A bad reaction in RVS is totally possible. I believe you believe what you say you believe though.In post 64, Redados wrote:
I disagree. RVS is a time where you goof off and vote randomly, and then you learn from people's reactions to those random votes. Once people start reacting, RVS is over and then the goofing off ends.In post 62, MagikHorse wrote:
Saying that this behavior is NAI because it's RVS is the same thing as saying you shouldn't be read off of it, which is just another way of saying "gimme a pass on this behavior, it means nothing". They're one and the same.In post 60, Redados wrote: You can make the statement that certain types of actions in RVS aren't useful, and that's certainly true. In what you quoted, I'm not saying "I get a free pass because it's RVS". I'm saying that it's NAI because it's RVS. Those are two different discussions in my opinion.
Why do you think this is NAI anyways?
In my opinion, overanalyzing RVS actions is unnecessary because the valuable information is in thereactionsto the RVS. I could post as the first post of the game the words, "I am scum" and that is NAI because it's RVS.
OMGUS and LAMIST are scumtells, so I won't ever get to do them outside of RVS. I did them (in a tongue-in cheek way - as I literally said "LAMIST" and "OMGUS" in my posts, thus acknowledging them) because I thought it was funny and didn't matter. I still think that they are funny and that they don't matter.
NAI = Not Alignment Indicative
This post seems sane.In post 71, ItalianoVD wrote:Sorry peeps. Weekends are pretty tough for me as I like to spend the weekend with family; hiking, camping, fishing, kayaking, etc. so most of the time I’m out the house or I’m in a poor data area. I just wanted to quickly put down my thoughts before I’m gone for most of the day.
So far what stands out to me:
Frogsterking said he’d be back after he washed the dishes. He hasn’t returned yet so he must have either had a whole lotta dishes or his girlfriend said he can’t play with his friends, for not doing those dishes. Can’t wait for him to return and tell us what happened.
MUSHSHAGANA is someone I like. So far her posting and overall vibe seems good to me. Her push onto Redados seems genuine and I can’t really question it, but after playing with Redados he did play this loose as town. I can admit however that the LAMIST and OMGUS stuff was careless, but I could actually see town!Redados play this way. Shelly knows this. Unfortunately I don’t know how he would play as scum so take that as you will.
Shelly is back to her repeat posting from last game when she was scum. And by repeat posting I mean she says exactly what the other player says, almost word for word. As I pointed out.
Redados has put himself in a pretty tough position with his play so far. For now I’m gonna semi-town read him because while I wouldn’t put it past scum!Redados to play this way, I’m not sure how likely it is.
That’s it so far. I’m okay with leaving my vote on shelly at the moment. As I said I’ll be gone. Any questions asked I’ll answer when I can. Peace.
I think the way you came to your reads is super cool. Not quoting it all because it's huge and this post is getting long already.In post 74, Frogsterking wrote:How I think about mafia-type games (mafia, secret hitler, werewolf, etc.): I think players who play this genre develop a style over time (and with it a preference for different formats of the game and situations which occur within those games). One way I think about the style-difference is if the player is logical vs behavioral, logical being that they focus on making the highest percentage play in the situation and behavioral focusing on minutiae of what the other players are saying and attempting to find hidden indicators of the players alignment. I think logical players tend to excel in fields like law, accounting, medicine, and is linked with a personality trait from the big five called Conscientiousness. These guys excel in setups that have many mechanics and require more detailed technical knowledge of the game and the format it is being played in. I believe behavioral players are linked with a personality trait also from the big five called Openness to experience and as such often have some kind of arts background. They excel in setups such as this one without many complex mechanics and the possibility of low info lylo situations with no clears. Most players eventually develop some traits of both even if they heavily lean one way.
I think people also have different communication styles they prefer which i think about as analytical, accommodating, and assertive. Most of us will use each of these styles but have a default one we prefer. We tend to be more receptive when others talk in our default state or the one we're in at the moment.
Another trait from the big five I think about a lot while playing games these types of games is agreeable vs disagreeable, which means how likely you are to be trusting, cooperate, empathetic vs skeptical, competitive and distrusting.
As for myself, I'd say I'm a highly-behavioral player, assertive with the compassion to be accommodating. For the last set, IDK. I call out BS and protect my townbabies like a momma bear. Is that agreeable or disagreeable?
Can you guess my career too?
Also I agree with the "use all the time allotted" mindset, since mafia find it much more difficult to keep up a facade. That being said I acknowledge my hubris causes me to disobey this mindset in a tic.
Smack those hornet nests. They'll show themselves to be hornets eventually.In post 83, Redados wrote:Quiet scum is scum we can't catch.
Mostly feeling good about Frog and Red.
Want more posts from different people about game-related things instead of theory.
You're on notice.In post 86, ItalianoVD wrote:
Call it anxiety or paranoia, but I’m not gonna feel comfortable with you until you are flipped and we know what your true alignment is.In post 78, shellyc wrote:Yes, I was scum that game. However I have rolled town in this game, and I have actually made an effort to not rephrase / repeat what others have said.
I started off by asking a few questions to generate info during RVS (Why Frogster didn't vote during RVS, why discussion became general)
I then pushed Redados and called him scummy twice. I was also being aggressive towards Redados. I also made reads on several players.
I didn’t question your push. I’m not even really uneasy about you because of your push. It’s really because of our recent history. And can you really deny the similarities of 23 and 34 and say that I shouldn’t be wary of it.In post 79, shellyc wrote:I haven't been repeat posting. They thought Mush's push was geninue, but questions my push? This is contradictory. Still, I don't know how much of that is AI.
It bugs me when people say "the town." It sounds so self-exclusionary.In post 91, ItalianoVD wrote:You said all this last game. I don’t think our back and forth is helping the town here.Hey again.
This is the most phoned-in intro ever. Like it was phoned in on an actual phone.In post 122, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I don't see much to comment on for now. If anyone would like my comment on anything, feel free to make a post on the matter.
Props to Shelly for calling this out.
The scummiest person is the person calling you out. Brilliant.In post 126, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
I think you have behaved the scummiest of all the players who have posted. However, I don't really think that is as relevant as whom I think is most likely to be scum.In post 124, shellyc wrote:Who do you think is scummiest now, or are you not having reads yet?
How are these mutually exclusive?In post 130, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
You seemed more concerned about being right than winning the game.In post 127, shellyc wrote:What is the reason you regard me as scummy?
Ugh. Reading the rest of page 6 just makes me mad y'all dunked the towniest voice in this entire game. I'm resonating with every one of her posts.
Moving on.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
In post 150, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:However, I don't think it necessarily means she is a mafioso, just an egotistical person. shellyc, describing you as egotistical is not meant as an insult, but just a description.
Wait what?In post 152, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Upon further reconsideration of shellyc's personality reflected by her posts, I think she thought I was looking for a fight. Really makes her actions extremely non-alignment indicative.- Casey
-
Casey
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
How do you define "scummy" if not as "indicative of scum"?In post 168, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I thought and think that the behaviour is scummy, but probably not-alignment indicative.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
As someone scumreading Italiano, I have to pause and consider if these are implicit biases of mine.In post 171, Frogsterking wrote:I feel like the combination of his username and sales background could make Italiano seem scummy subconsciously to others sometimes
I don't think they are.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
In post 640, Frogsterking wrote:
That was an unusually fast townread.In post 634, Casey wrote:Hi! I'm replacing in for MagikHorse!
Time to whip this game into shape.
Initial question is how do we have 12 days left in a 7-day day?
Reading now.
Welcome to the town Casey!- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Now with actually typing in the right area:In post 640, Frogsterking wrote:
That was an unusually fast townread.In post 634, Casey wrote:Hi! I'm replacing in for MagikHorse!
Time to whip this game into shape.
Initial question is how do we have 12 days left in a 7-day day?
Reading now.
Welcome to the town Casey!- Casey
-
Casey
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
That was an unusually fast townread.In post 640, Frogsterking wrote:
Welcome to the town Casey!In post 634, Casey wrote:Hi! I'm replacing in for MagikHorse!
Time to whip this game into shape.
Initial question is how do we have 12 days left in a 7-day day?
Reading now.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
I hope there's more than just a "Hmm" to this at this point. Otherwise you just assigned busywork with the sole intention of killing a conversation.In post 186, Frogsterking wrote:
Hmm..In post 183, Redados wrote:Yeah. (ignoring last game) this game Shelly has been pretty active and pushing. I don't necessarily agree with her pushes because she reaallly does not like being scumread. I am still scumreading her.
(using last game) I don't agree with Shelly's constant pushing because she was doing that last game; she kept yelling at MiniMegabyte for "scumslipping" (Mini was town). I think it's not helpful to latch onto small things and use them to justify a scumread. Sometimes you have a feeling you can't justify, but I think it's disingenuous to pull weak justification for your scumread. In retrospect, I may have done that with my initial scumread of Shelly, so I'm revising my scumread from a justified one to a gut one.
(ignoring last game) ItalianoVD has not been super active but he's posted enough. He's given reads and had conversations with people. I don't really have a handle on his alignment yet.
(using last game) something someone else said about how Italiano's playstyle might make him look scummier than he is resonates with me. I spent a lot of last game oscillating back and forth whether Italiano was scum or town and my impression is that he could hide it well enough if he were scum. It makes me scared to townread him or scumread him, although I'm townreading him now. I do feel like he was more active and off-the-cuff last game, but I haven't gone back and really ISOd and compared, which I will do at some point.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Yo, way to hold him to it. Thumbs up.In post 189, Redados wrote:That was off the cuff so I'm curious to hear your reaction.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
I literally never remember seeing your name before this.In post 187, rocknil wrote:I think I'm getting strong town vibe from MUSHSHAGANA.
UNVOTE: MUSHSHAGANA- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
- Casey
-
Casey
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
I scumread people who do math.In post 201, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Let x be the probability that all 3 mafioso are in 5 random players.
x = 10/13*9/12*3/11*2/10*1/9 + 10/13*3/12*9/11*2/10*1/9* + 10/13*3/12*2/11*9/10*1/9 + 10/13*3/12*2/11*1/10*9/9 + 3/13*10/12*9/11*2/10*1/9 + 3/13*10/12*2/11*9/10*1/9 + 3/13*10/12*2/11*1/10*9/9 + 3/13*2/12*10/11*9/10*1/9 + 3/13*2/12*10/11*1/10*9/9 + 3/13*2/12*1/11*10/10*9/9
= 10 ((10*9*3*2*1)/(13*12*11*10*9))
= 5/143 ≈ 3.50%- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Another call-out. I must've missed the answer to the last one.In post 210, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
After going through all that trouble of answering one of you questions, I have got to know what was the point of these questions?In post 180, Frogsterking wrote:Hey Frederick, I just thought of a couple of questions for you! Mainly because you replaced in recently and I noticed you had just finished moderating a game.
1) Have you noticed anything telling about lobbies on this site where all of the scum players became among the top 5 most active players in the game on D1?
and
2) Have you noticed anything telling about lobbies on this site where all of the scum players became among the top 5 most townread players in the game on D1?- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
I'm holding you to this.In post 247, Frogsterking wrote:I've been giving myself a little time away so I can get a fresh look at things. I plan on posting my preferred D1 lunch candidate list tonight or tomorrow morning and a separate list for any players I tr. I plan on responding to posts by Mush, Redados and Frederick.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
I read that paper and I'm significantly disappointed that none of my four favorite scumtells were analyzed.In post 254, Frogsterking wrote:Here's the full research if you want to read:
https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... _Detection
1. Forming common activity suggestions solely as questions instead of statements. This one is frighteningly good. (e.g. "Are we good with voting X?" instead of "Let's vote X y'all.")Stop trying to avoid taking a stance, scum.
2. Using temporary qualifiers for things that shouldn't be temporary. (e.g. "X is my top scumread for now.")Why "for now?" Are you planning on changing it soon?
3. Using math, specifically to determine who is best to vote. In an endgame scenario, this one is surprisingly good. (e.g. "If we vote off X, that gives us a 5/7 chance in the last two days, rather than a 3/7 chance.")Okay but why are you letting math override your scumread?
4. Using "honest" or related words when opining. This one is commonly just a NAI filler word, but it helps make folks sweat when they get called out on it. (e.g. "Honestly, I think X is scum." instead of "I think X is scum.")Were you being dishonest prior to now?
Mostly what I do is get reads from my gut and call out BS when I see it.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
NEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRDIn post 254, Frogsterking wrote:I double-checked my research on syntax this afternoon and was mixed up about sentence length and pronouns; longer sentences and use of the second-person were negatively correlated with scum not positively.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
I actually see the opposite. The amount of times he's dropped a conversation with "Fair enough" or "I guess we'll just have to disagree" would be a workout program if he dropped that many pounds instead.In post 257, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:MagikHorse, can I get your opinion of Italiano's play? My take is: emotionally charged reasoning presenting with logical face. His play is also centered on himself -- which manifests as Always Right (unwillingness to concede lost points, unwillingness to cooperate with other players, etc), and deeply entrenched reads (taking subjective view as objective truth).- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
1. Did you read the paper? Arguably the only thing tangible it highlights as a scumtell is a reduced activity level, and it doesn't take a...In post 258, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I'm going to post my first public read: I think Frogsterking is town. If he isn't town, he's unreadable. I think his playstyle edges a bit toward anti-town overall, he's focused on game-solving over scum-hunting, but scum has no reason to give town a weapon like that paper. Arguably against their win condition to do so.twenty-fold stratified shuffle splitto figure that out.
2. I think he seems like the kind of guy who doesn't feel good about a win unless he lets the opposing team take their best shot at him. Not out of hubris, but out of fairness. Debates of a grand scale of life an death, humanity versus nature, and a search for truth and purity. He did mention he played paragraph games prior and was getting used to the more rapid-fire nature, after all. It's not his fault he's a nerd.
Show me the hornets.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Who is the mafia?In post 659, rocknil wrote:
Some find peace in solitude lol. Welcome aboard, Casey.In post 649, Casey wrote:How do you have only 10 posts so far? I replaced in 2 hours ago and my ISO is already larger than yours.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Haven't gotten that far. I'll get to it when I get to it.In post 665, Frogsterking wrote:Casey if you didn't already say what is your opinion of the N1 Mush kill and my Rocknil/Lavar theory.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Also what downgraded me from "town" to "lightly townread"?In post 663, Frogsterking wrote:Okay I lightly townread MagikHorse and now I lightly townread Casey in the same slot which makes my life a lot easier.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Okay so look at these.
In post 640, Frogsterking wrote:Welcome to the town Casey!In post 659, rocknil wrote:Welcome aboard, Casey.
Italiano and Rock welcome me to the game / aboard, but you specifically welcome me to theIn post 660, ItalianoVD wrote:Welcome to the game Casey.town.- Casey
-
Casey
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Someone watched Korra.In post 276, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:"Just, you know, do the thing!" -> "What thing is that even supposed to mean?"- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
VOTE: ItalianoIn post 676, ItalianoVD wrote:
Mafia: an organized international body of criminals, operating originally in Sicily and now especially in Italy and the US and having a complex and ruthless behavioral code.In post 664, Casey wrote:
Who is the mafia?In post 660, ItalianoVD wrote:Welcome to the game Casey. You can definitely talk.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
I agree with this. I've seen folks with a guilty mindset try to justify the stupidest things, or play things off as "just a joke." If they're willing to cover up that dumpster fire, what are they hiding in their apartment?In post 329, Redados wrote:I wouldn't say that admitting a mistake is AI, but I think that it's pro-town for me to accept that I was wrong about something and admit it.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Media is already plural. The singular is medium.In post 336, Frogsterking wrote:i've overreacted to reactions before in medias im more experienced in
Just an FYI.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
This post should be making me feel good about Frog, but...In post 345, Frogsterking wrote:
it made me feel joy insideIn post 189, Redados wrote:
That was off the cuff so I'm curious to hear your reaction.In post 186, Frogsterking wrote:
Hmm..In post 183, Redados wrote:Yeah. (ignoring last game) this game Shelly has been pretty active and pushing. I don't necessarily agree with her pushes because she reaallly does not like being scumread. I am still scumreading her.
(using last game) I don't agree with Shelly's constant pushing because she was doing that last game; she kept yelling at MiniMegabyte for "scumslipping" (Mini was town). I think it's not helpful to latch onto small things and use them to justify a scumread. Sometimes you have a feeling you can't justify, but I think it's disingenuous to pull weak justification for your scumread. In retrospect, I may have done that with my initial scumread of Shelly, so I'm revising my scumread from a justified one to a gut one.
(ignoring last game) ItalianoVD has not been super active but he's posted enough. He's given reads and had conversations with people. I don't really have a handle on his alignment yet.
(using last game) something someone else said about how Italiano's playstyle might make him look scummier than he is resonates with me. I spent a lot of last game oscillating back and forth whether Italiano was scum or town and my impression is that he could hide it well enough if he were scum. It makes me scared to townread him or scumread him, although I'm townreading him now. I do feel like he was more active and off-the-cuff last game, but I haven't gone back and really ISOd and compared, which I will do at some point.
1) Why did it take you so long to respond?
...and...
2) Did such a response really merit an "I'm planning to respond" ptap post?In post 247, Frogsterking wrote:I plan on responding to posts by Mush, Redados and Frederick.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
You're not reading this game if you can't figure out what my reads are so far.In post 684, ItalianoVD wrote:
Who do you think the mafia is? You’re reading the game. What have you come up with? I could tell you, but I don’t want it to persuade your thinking.In post 679, Casey wrote:
VOTE: ItalianoIn post 676, ItalianoVD wrote:
Mafia: an organized international body of criminals, operating originally in Sicily and now especially in Italy and the US and having a complex and ruthless behavioral code.In post 664, Casey wrote:
Who is the mafia?In post 660, ItalianoVD wrote:Welcome to the game Casey. You can definitely talk.
What is up with people safeguarding their thoughts this game?
And your instinct says..?In post 690, rocknil wrote:
No idea! Unfortunately, I am not a mind reader and my scumread game is weak af. I'll have to trust my instinct.In post 662, Casey wrote: Who is the mafia?- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
This is noncommittal AF.In post 356, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:When I first entered the game and thought she behaved the scummiest of all the players, I thought her thinking I had a scumread on her was because she simply failed to understand that I didn't necessarily think she was scum.
English isn't your first language, correct?
Willing to give a pass for that.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Curious if a vote is incoming. This feels odd to just take their word for it instead of doing the research.In post 418, LavarManos wrote:I think shellyc is behaving rather townily because of her utter willingness to be the hang. However, some of you have said that she played similarly in your last game with her? That doesn't make me feel as good.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
I'm an English college graduate. That doesn't make me a teacher by default!In post 697, Redados wrote:Casey, are you a teacher?- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
When you see someone get called the scummiest person in the game, don't you think it's reasonable that the accuser believes that person is scum?In post 696, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
Considering I learned English before I ever entered kindergarten, you could say it is.In post 695, Casey wrote:
This is noncommittal AF.In post 356, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:When I first entered the game and thought she behaved the scummiest of all the players, I thought her thinking I had a scumread on her was because she simply failed to understand that I didn't necessarily think she was scum.
English isn't your first language, correct?
Willing to give a pass for that.
Do you think it makes sense that the accuser thinks someone else is mafia but not the scummiest person?
Do you have any precedent of calling someone the scummiest person in the game but not having a scumread on them?- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
I sincerely hope there's more to your catch-up than this.In post 429, LavarManos wrote:I am almost caught up, and I have a few more pages to go. Before I finish the read...
This is true, but I feel like it is easier to townread a townie who is being scumread than to scumread a townie who is being townread as scum.In post 426, MagikHorse wrote:Even then, if my plan was to be safe why risk claiming the Shelly townread when most people at the time were scumreading her?
Your point about why you haven't been able to do more real time stuff is fair, so I guess I'm leaning towards rocknil then.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
In post 438, LavarManos wrote:I think Redados unvoting is townie because he could have easily kept his vote on shellyc if she is town.
I am still not completely understanding why she is our primary target for elimination. I think her posts have been fine this game.In post 439, Redados wrote:LavarManos, who would you like to lim today? (I suggest that you vote for them)
Disappointing.In post 440, LavarManos wrote:To be frank, I am not sure and I do not feel confident voting in anyone. My catchup was quite a skim, so I feel like I may be missing out on some important details. I'm not sure I believe in a shellyc elimination though. Perhaps rocknil or Fredrick?- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
I'm yelling at a corpse, but maybe she can hear me from the grave: not publishing your findings is frustrating.In post 453, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Oh, and for the record, my push on Frederick began as a weak scumread and now is quite strong. It wasn’t baseless in fact, just in appearance. There is no player who I scumread so high as Frederick in this game.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
This paragraph makes me frown.In post 457, rocknil wrote:She really started wanting to appear as town so far so she voted herself without any provocation. After that She claimed VT which is convenient as claiming a PR will immediately get her CC’d. Her appealing to emotions has really backfired. I think her playstyle is harming the town more than any of her contributions. It is safe to eliminate her either way.
1. Scum can goad a CC on their way out. I disagree that a VT claim makes someone more likely mafia.
2. You talk about appeal to emotions as if it's inherently a mafia trait. I've had townies AtE me plenty of times. Mafia almost never.
3. "Her playstyle is harming the town" sounds self-exclusionary and really doesn't make me believe you ever truly thought she was mafia.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Rude.In post 464, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:shellyc had failed to make coherent thoughts throughout this game. How is she suddenly able to come up with the idea of fake claiming a power role?- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
A vocal majority has panned Rock's post (including me!) but you're willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, despite saying it seems a little forced. Why is that?In post 471, ItalianoVD wrote:Rocknil now voting for shelly with a long post saying why seems a little forced, but I’d like to give you the benefit of the doubt. You don’t talk all day, then you come in with a fairly decent reason for voting.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Pretty sure these two aren't buddies.In post 474, Redados wrote:
Maybe it's all in my head but I feel like you've been much less active this game than last.In post 473, ItalianoVD wrote:
You know you don’t have to keep prompting me to post my thoughts. I will and do.In post 462, Redados wrote: It's Monday. I would like to hear more of ItalianoVD's thoughts on current events.
Not alignment indicative of course because real life stuff comes up and is more important. But I keep forgetting that you're even in the game.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
This is different from how you described your "hmm" earlier.In post 477, Frogsterking wrote:My reaction is that it's a conscientious and cooperative response. NAI and pro-town.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Here:
...and...In post 345, Frogsterking wrote:
it made me feel joy insideIn post 189, Redados wrote:
That was off the cuff so I'm curious to hear your reaction.In post 186, Frogsterking wrote:
Hmm..In post 183, Redados wrote:Yeah. (ignoring last game) this game Shelly has been pretty active and pushing. I don't necessarily agree with her pushes because she reaallly does not like being scumread. I am still scumreading her.
(using last game) I don't agree with Shelly's constant pushing because she was doing that last game; she kept yelling at MiniMegabyte for "scumslipping" (Mini was town). I think it's not helpful to latch onto small things and use them to justify a scumread. Sometimes you have a feeling you can't justify, but I think it's disingenuous to pull weak justification for your scumread. In retrospect, I may have done that with my initial scumread of Shelly, so I'm revising my scumread from a justified one to a gut one.
(ignoring last game) ItalianoVD has not been super active but he's posted enough. He's given reads and had conversations with people. I don't really have a handle on his alignment yet.
(using last game) something someone else said about how Italiano's playstyle might make him look scummier than he is resonates with me. I spent a lot of last game oscillating back and forth whether Italiano was scum or town and my impression is that he could hide it well enough if he were scum. It makes me scared to townread him or scumread him, although I'm townreading him now. I do feel like he was more active and off-the-cuff last game, but I haven't gone back and really ISOd and compared, which I will do at some point.
A conscientious, cooperative, pro-town, but ultimately NAI response made you feel joy inside?In post 477, Frogsterking wrote:
My reaction is that it's a conscientious and cooperative response. NAI and pro-town.In post 189, Redados wrote:
That was off the cuff so I'm curious to hear your reaction.In post 186, Frogsterking wrote:
Hmm..In post 183, Redados wrote:Yeah. (ignoring last game) this game Shelly has been pretty active and pushing. I don't necessarily agree with her pushes because she reaallly does not like being scumread. I am still scumreading her.
(using last game) I don't agree with Shelly's constant pushing because she was doing that last game; she kept yelling at MiniMegabyte for "scumslipping" (Mini was town). I think it's not helpful to latch onto small things and use them to justify a scumread. Sometimes you have a feeling you can't justify, but I think it's disingenuous to pull weak justification for your scumread. In retrospect, I may have done that with my initial scumread of Shelly, so I'm revising my scumread from a justified one to a gut one.
(ignoring last game) ItalianoVD has not been super active but he's posted enough. He's given reads and had conversations with people. I don't really have a handle on his alignment yet.
(using last game) something someone else said about how Italiano's playstyle might make him look scummier than he is resonates with me. I spent a lot of last game oscillating back and forth whether Italiano was scum or town and my impression is that he could hide it well enough if he were scum. It makes me scared to townread him or scumread him, although I'm townreading him now. I do feel like he was more active and off-the-cuff last game, but I haven't gone back and really ISOd and compared, which I will do at some point.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
What did you see? Because all I saw was disappointment.In post 480, Frogsterking wrote:The guy that just replaced in looks town.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
This is a good answer.In post 713, ItalianoVD wrote:
Simply because I wanted to give him a chance to build more of a presence in the game. This way I could have more information before making a final decision. I haven’t really gotten that which is why he has my vote for today.In post 707, Casey wrote:
A vocal majority has panned Rock's post (including me!) but you're willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, despite saying it seems a little forced. Why is that?In post 471, ItalianoVD wrote:Rocknil now voting for shelly with a long post saying why seems a little forced, but I’d like to give you the benefit of the doubt. You don’t talk all day, then you come in with a fairly decent reason for voting.
That is some mad confidence you have.In post 714, ItalianoVD wrote:
So who do you think the scum is?In post 694, Casey wrote: You're not reading this game if you can't figure out what my reads are so far.
What is up with people safeguarding their thoughts this game?
Almost done reading D1. Recap to come afterward.- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Spoilers I read ahead. I found this:
In post 550, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Last minute baseless speculation:
Consider a Frogster and Frederick scumteam. They play off of each other constantly, they reinforce each other; even Frogster’s criticism seems anticipated and expected.
If Shelly flips green... consider the value of a Frogster and Frederick scumteam and compare it with how their interactions and play have been.
Also, my survival or death has no bearing on this baseless speculation whether you want it to or not, to prevent Town from getting suckered into a wildly off base round of game solving nonsense. Even if scum actually use worried about this, don’t read into it. Follow my earlier play if I die tonight.In post 556, Redados wrote:Why did Fredrick not vote???? Was he afraid to hammer because he knew that ShellyC was town? Or am I overthinking it?
VOTE: Fredrick A Campbell
I think Rock in this chain of posts is kinda gross.In post 557, rocknil wrote:Mush was onto Frogsterking and Fredrick A Campbell. And looking back I think Fredrick A Campbell was working hard to blend in. I find it more scummy than others.
VOTE: Fredrick A Campbell- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
TOWN
Redados - Consistent, fearless posting. Strongest townread by far. Nothing to complain about here, at all.
OK
Italiano - Confusing, though consistent and confident. Someone earlier mentioned he was like a puppy dog playing in the snow and after a reread I can feel that vibe.
MEH
Frog - The theory lessons are great, but it would also be great if he'ddo something.
Campbell - Frustrating posts. Weak townreads. Non-committal.
NAH
Rocknil - Less Rock than Nil. Hasn't followed through withanyactivity as claimed. Biggest post was a heckin sketchy dud.
LavarManos - Absolutely 100% disappointing and gross posts.
I have 4 pages left to read. Barring any revelations, Lavar needs to go.- Casey
-
Casey
- Casey
-
Casey Goon
- Casey
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 562
- Joined: December 26, 2008
Here's some expounding on my thoughts.
What's up with this waffle?In post 698, Casey wrote:
Curious if a vote is incoming. This feels odd to just take their word for it instead of doing the research.In post 418, LavarManos wrote:I think shellyc is behaving rather townily because of her utter willingness to be the hang. However, some of you have said that she played similarly in your last game with her? That doesn't make me feel as good.
Here's Lavar asking for permission to vote. This is at the very end of D1, with everyone already in agreement to hammer before it goes no-lim. This is pretty much my #1 red flag, showing an outsider trying to get in on town action.In post 715, Casey wrote:
Ew ew ew this is so gross.In post 540, LavarManos wrote:I am here. Should I hammer shelly?
Also in D1:In post 701, Casey wrote:In post 429, LavarManos wrote:I am almost caught up, and I have a few more pages to go. Before I finish the read... - Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey
- Casey