Newbie 2025 | Lilies | Game Over
Forum rules
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
In post 19, ItalianoVD wrote:Lol. Moving gifs are better and you know it.In post 19, Redados wrote:ItalianoVD, if you happen to read this after the game, please change your avatar to be stationary lol
I'm feeling pretty good and looking forward to playing again! I have a question for you: are you Italian?In post 18, ItalianoVD wrote:Only other player I know is Redados. How’s it going my dude?- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
In post 10, shellyc wrote:Any special reasons from those PoVs? Just curious
I'm not criticizing or praising (yet), but I am noting that there is a question in all four of ShellyC's posts.In post 34, shellyc wrote:The problem is, why is this thread the General Discussion Forum all of a sudden after I was asleep?- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Shelly. No sheeping!In post 37, ItalianoVD wrote:Oh no. Shelly doing it again.
VOTE: ShellyCIn post 25, Redados wrote:I will not tolerate any "noob" behavior from ShellyC this game after she fooled me last game!
It is going to take me some time to get used to Mush's playstyle. My first impression is that she likes to post flowery walls of prose which are hard for me to read and get the gist of. I will need to get better at slowing down and reading those.In post 37, ItalianoVD wrote:@MUSHSHAGANA I can’t say you are thinking too deep.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I'm not going to apologize for goofing around in RVS.In post 38, shellyc wrote:I am trying to generate information from the questioning. So you think that's a problem.
Something I want to point out is how Redados is scummy to me.
He started with LAMIST (saying it's cryptography), turns the thread into the general discussion forum, then votes with the reason of OMGUS. I would like to hear more from you, because I don't like how you are playing - a different vibe from your last towngame.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Please give me credit for having not yet posted a reads list!In post 37, ItalianoVD wrote:Last game I played with Redados I pushed him for listing a readslist on page 2, so I‘m probably not the best one to ask about reaching.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
This is a fair assessment. My first thought was that Shelly is asking a lot of questions and they're not good questions. Then I looked at each of the questions and I would say that one of those was a good question (re: Frogster). So I didn't want to jump and say that Shelly is asking bad questions.In post 43, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Hmmm. I didn't think too hard on the "oh, Shelly asks many questions" thing Redados said, which may have been a mistake.
Reasons to say that:
Drawing attention to "fishing for ???" -- the information being gotten is on playstyle and game state changes. And that's not very scum-indicative. Unsure of why you'd draw attention to it -- say she's scum: put a fool in a rope factory and so on, you're just making it likely they'll play harder at hiding when they're role-fishing. And if she's town, it's a town thing to do, so it's very uninformative all around.
However, I don't think that Shelly is asking good questions either and that her other questions amount to fluff.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I don't think this was an important question. I don't think Shelly is wrong for asking this, I'm just saying that it's not substantial.In post 45, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Why I made my RVS vote -- I said I had an actual reason, that makes it a way to get game relevant information. In fact, that is the actual point of RVS.
I've already conceded this.In post 45, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Why Frogster hadn't voted -- obvious.
Not game-relevant and not super substantive. Again, she's not wrong for asking this.In post 45, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Why Frogster wanted to hear my reason in the specific ways he did -- not obviously game relevant, but there's literally not /anything/ to work with at that point, and it increases the amount of information she gets in his next post.
I don't see it as an original observation, I see it as repeating someone else's observation but phrased s a question in order to make it seem substantive than it really is.In post 45, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:And the "General Discussion" comment is... making the exact same observation you're saying that you're making, but as a general thing ("why is everyone focused on fluff") instead of a specific thing ("why is SHELLY focused on fluff"). And for the record, one is more reasonable than the other, since I've written more fluff by volume than anyone else and I haven't seen anyone finger-wagging at me yet.
^Consider the above as me finger wagging at you.In post 39, Redados wrote:It is going to take me some time to get used to Mush's playstyle. My first impression is that she likes to post flowery walls of prose which are hard for me to read and get the gist of. I will need to get better at slowing down and reading those.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
OMGUS much?In post 50, shellyc wrote:Initial Impressions #1
- Redados: Posted that I asked questions, seemingly discrediting my curiosity, and I obviously didn't post fluff? But adapted his opinion. Don't like his LAMIST opening, and OMGUS voting. LAMIST / OMGUS are scumreads to me imo. Also I feel a different vibe from their last towngame in Newbie 2019.
I would like to remind everyone that LAMIST and OMGUS were both tongue-in-cheek and in RVS. As for "vibe", last game I was super stiff and then kind of relaxed my playing and posting style towards the end, and that's how I'm feeling now (kind of relaxed).
It's fine, it's just a vote, she's pushing and being active. I'm not close to being limmed. I'm at what, E-3?In post 51, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Townies are sure to act scummy every so often, and we have one person who hasn't posted and two (I think?) who have only posted once. Only one SE you could really call active. Consider we've only got between 3 and 5 meaningfully active players right now, and there's only two scum and a total of 9 players.
I feel it's very premature to push to eliminate right now.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I'm not super enjoying this post.In post 53, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I don't want to press too hard when better than half of the players aren't active and have posted little useful information to make determinations with. I'd explain in more detail why it could be bad to press too hard too early, but that'd give the game away. Call it Day 2 I'll tell everyone, assuming I'm not dead. Reserving the right to say so earlier, of course, just setting realistic expectations in the longer term.
Pushing players is fine. That's how we gain information and find scum. No, we don't want to eliminate five hours into day one. That's because the longer the day is and the more posts there are, the more information we gain.
I am not super enjoying your post.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Last game, I was pretty stiff initially because I didn't want to come across as scum (I was town, for reference). But eventually I figured it that if I'm just loose and post what I think, then I'll be fine.In post 58, shellyc wrote:I'm not sure how I feel about Redados's reaction, and I didnt notice I was OMGUSing. Why are you relaxed this game? Any special reasoning?
You can make the statement that certain types of actions in RVS aren't useful, and that's certainly true. In what you quoted, I'm not saying "I get a free pass because it's RVS". I'm saying that it's NAI because it's RVS. Those are two different discussions in my opinion.In post 59, MagikHorse wrote:
Does being in RVS give people a free pass to be so flippant? Doesn't this sort of behavior only gum up the thread and make it harder to get out of RVS, especially if more people were to do it?In post 54, Redados wrote:I would like to remind everyone that LAMIST and OMGUS were both tongue-in-cheek and in RVS.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I disagree. RVS is a time where you goof off and vote randomly, and then you learn from people's reactions to those random votes. Once people start reacting, RVS is over and then the goofing off ends.In post 62, MagikHorse wrote:
Saying that this behavior is NAI because it's RVS is the same thing as saying you shouldn't be read off of it, which is just another way of saying "gimme a pass on this behavior, it means nothing". They're one and the same.In post 60, Redados wrote: You can make the statement that certain types of actions in RVS aren't useful, and that's certainly true. In what you quoted, I'm not saying "I get a free pass because it's RVS". I'm saying that it's NAI because it's RVS. Those are two different discussions in my opinion.
Why do you think this is NAI anyways?
In my opinion, overanalyzing RVS actions is unnecessary because the valuable information is in thereactionsto the RVS. I could post as the first post of the game the words, "I am scum" and that is NAI because it's RVS.
OMGUS and LAMIST are scumtells, so I won't ever get to do them outside of RVS. I did them (in a tongue-in cheek way - as I literally said "LAMIST" and "OMGUS" in my posts, thus acknowledging them) because I thought it was funny and didn't matter. I still think that they are funny and that they don't matter.
NAI = Not Alignment Indicative- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
That's not what I said. There's goofing off and then there's the learning from the goofing off. You need both.In post 66, shellyc wrote:
RVS is when we get all the info for the rest of the game. If we don't get info out of RVS, what's the point? You basically said RVS was a time to play around and not be serious, which isn't true.In post 64, Redados wrote:I disagree. RVS is a time where you goof off and vote randomly, and then you learn from people's reactions to those random votes. Once people start reacting, RVS is over and then the goofing off ends.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
ItalianoVD, ShellyC, and I played in Newbie 2019. ItalianoVD and I were town and ShellyC was scum. A lot of ShellyC's posts weren't really substantial; she would just synthesize what others posted. She was not creating as much content as it appeared on the surface.
I chalked this up to the fact that it was her first game, because when I first started playing Werewolf, I did the same thing. I wanted to participate and be part of it, and I saw what other people were saying and I kind of repeated it, synthesized it. So I gave Shelly the benefit of the doubt and assumed that she was just playing that way because she was new.
She was scum. She is kind of playing the same way so far in this game, and I'm not going to give her the benefit of the doubt anymore. I am scumreading her slightly. The other pushes on me are fine but I am not a fan of Shelly's push on me.
--
As an aside, if anyone is into meta dives, Newbie 2019 is only like forty pages long and it is the only full game of Italiano, Shelly, and myself on the whole site, and we all lasted until pretty much the end. So it might give more insight into our dynamic.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Thanks for the big post, Frogster!
Now both you and Mush have alluded to keeping the pressure low early in the day. I agree with the idea of not lynching until we've used all our time. But by saying, "we'll keep the pressure low", we don't LEARN anything. No one is going to care that they are being pushed because the pressure is "supposed" to be low. So I'm not really following this train of thought other than to say that I agree that we should use all of our time.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I agree with Shelly. I think that if everyone is active and engaged, that lets us get more information about who the scum is. If you try to let scum force the interactions, how do you know that the scum are the ones forcing the interactions? Quiet scum is scum we can't catch.In post 80, Frogsterking wrote:If we are town it's usually better to let the scum force the interactions because it gives us a chance to figure out what they are up to and identify them. If you are scum you're hoping town will tunnel a lot and create a lot of noise which helps you hide and look for potential weak spots.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Just btw there won't be a full response. I'm going to keep a vote on my scumread for now and see what happens.In post 96, shellyc wrote:Redados - They were my stated scumread. Still not looking too townie, and I am placing my vote on them for now. Would be nice to see a full response. Their recent posts have made me want to change my mind slightly though.
I did not know that was a thing! I feel a little silly for ISOing everyone and counting.In post 105, MagikHorse wrote:
This is not really helpful, given that anyone can simply scroll down to the bottom of the page, click "activity overview", and see every player's postcount at any moment. You can even get to everyone's ISOs from there too, just as you can by clicking the "ISO" button right next to the post number.In post 81, Redados wrote:Prefacing by saying that this is probably NAI at this point, but I was curious so I assumed everyone else would be too:
Post count -
loz:0
ItalianoVD:7
shellyc:14
Redados:23
rocknil:1
MUSHSHAGANA:16
MagikHorse (SE):7
Tatsuya Kaname (SE):2
Frogsterking (SE):4
Are you just curious, or think there's something to gain from doing this? I'm suspecting the former for now given your preface.
I may be tunneling but I'm not pushing. I feel most comfortable leaving my vote on my strongest scumread, even if no one else agrees for now.In post 114, ItalianoVD wrote:Sooo, not much else going at the moment and we still have people who haven’t started playing yet.
With that said I’ve been thinking and I will admit that it’s more about ego here than anything regarding Shelly. I’m gonna back off. It would suck so hilariously bad if shellyc was scum again.
UNVOTE: shellyc
My tunnel vision isn’t gonna help the town though so...
I was not aware of the button.In post 125, MagikHorse wrote:There's being agreeable, then there's busywork for the sake of looking active. This looks a lot more like the latter than the former to me, especially as they admitted themselves that it wasn't useful to do and there's a button that does it for you (though it's possible, if not probable, that they weren't aware of that).- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I'm playing this game differently so far, mostly because of IRL stuff. Last game I was hitting refresh and constantly checking the game and because of life circumstances, I am not available to do that right now. Last game was also a different type of game because there were less paragraphs and more one-liners, and I'm getting used to the new style. I'm getting used to paragraph vs paragraph. It's not an excuse, just more of an acknowledgement that I would like to get more involved with this game.In post 171, Frogsterking wrote:I feel like redados was noticeably more open and aggressive during his D1 town play of the other game and it could be indicative of an alignment change but I think that's a little thin.
Last game too I was constantly posting reads lists and impressions as they came to me. I am struggling to develop reads right now. I feel very in-my-head regarding ItalianoVD and ShellyC; my impressions of them from last game are burned into my head and it's like the opposite of a meta read. It's not helpful and I'm trying to separate them in my head that they don't necessarily have the same roles as last game. I'm townreading Italiano but I feel like it's leftover town cred from last game so not genuine.
I'm town-reading Mush, but I don't really have reads on anyone else. Again, the paragraph style of posting is something that I need to get used to.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Yeah. (ignoring last game) this game Shelly has been pretty active and pushing. I don't necessarily agree with her pushes because she reaallly does not like being scumread. I am still scumreading her.
(using last game) I don't agree with Shelly's constant pushing because she was doing that last game; she kept yelling at MiniMegabyte for "scumslipping" (Mini was town). I think it's not helpful to latch onto small things and use them to justify a scumread. Sometimes you have a feeling you can't justify, but I think it's disingenuous to pull weak justification for your scumread. In retrospect, I may have done that with my initial scumread of Shelly, so I'm revising my scumread from a justified one to a gut one.
(ignoring last game) ItalianoVD has not been super active but he's posted enough. He's given reads and had conversations with people. I don't really have a handle on his alignment yet.
(using last game) something someone else said about how Italiano's playstyle might make him look scummier than he is resonates with me. I spent a lot of last game oscillating back and forth whether Italiano was scum or town and my impression is that he could hide it well enough if he were scum. It makes me scared to townread him or scumread him, although I'm townreading him now. I do feel like he was more active and off-the-cuff last game, but I haven't gone back and really ISOd and compared, which I will do at some point.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
That was off the cuff so I'm curious to hear your reaction.In post 186, Frogsterking wrote:
Hmm..In post 183, Redados wrote:Yeah. (ignoring last game) this game Shelly has been pretty active and pushing. I don't necessarily agree with her pushes because she reaallly does not like being scumread. I am still scumreading her.
(using last game) I don't agree with Shelly's constant pushing because she was doing that last game; she kept yelling at MiniMegabyte for "scumslipping" (Mini was town). I think it's not helpful to latch onto small things and use them to justify a scumread. Sometimes you have a feeling you can't justify, but I think it's disingenuous to pull weak justification for your scumread. In retrospect, I may have done that with my initial scumread of Shelly, so I'm revising my scumread from a justified one to a gut one.
(ignoring last game) ItalianoVD has not been super active but he's posted enough. He's given reads and had conversations with people. I don't really have a handle on his alignment yet.
(using last game) something someone else said about how Italiano's playstyle might make him look scummier than he is resonates with me. I spent a lot of last game oscillating back and forth whether Italiano was scum or town and my impression is that he could hide it well enough if he were scum. It makes me scared to townread him or scumread him, although I'm townreading him now. I do feel like he was more active and off-the-cuff last game, but I haven't gone back and really ISOd and compared, which I will do at some point.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
You and I react very differently to being scumread. When I am scumread, I don't care, because I know that over time my towniness will shine through. You get defensive.In post 192, shellyc wrote:
Who would actually like being scumread, to be fair? AlsoIn post 183, Redados wrote:Yeah. (ignoring last game) this game Shelly has been pretty active and pushing. I don't necessarily agree with her pushes because she reaallly does not like being scumread. I am still scumreading her.not agreeing with my pushes != I am scum.We just have different viewpoints and interactions.
Your push on rocknil. He is clearly pretty new. I am not a fan of how you are communicating with him. I disagree with your pushes, and I am scumreading you.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Yeah and just to clarify, I typed it up for myself by ISOing everyone individually and then I decided to post it because I thought that if I had been curious about who was inactive that other people would to, like I said. I feel like I answered the question so maybe van is grasping a little bit.In post 221, MagikHorse wrote:
I more or less presumed an answer there really, as it really didn't look like he even thought about getting info from it. Doesn't help that my attention was pulled a lot more towards by Italiano by that point.In post 217, van wrote:Redados dodged MagikHorse's simple question in 128. While both the original post (81) and the question (105) aren't great, I find it odd that both Redados dodged the question and that MagikHorse never followed up on it. Why ask something if you're going to drop it without an answer? It's not a reactionary question in any shape or form, so there's little reason to drop it regardless of if you think you know the answer or not. This is especially true when you consider what MagikHorse said in 76 about pressure.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I think they were good questions for someone who had just replaced in. For me, it's easy to answer questions that people lob at me then to dig deeper unsolicited. The latter is more valuable, but I think that it was town-ish to lob you a softball to get you talking, because it's pro-town to have more talking and discussion.In post 210, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
After going through all that trouble of answering one of you questions, I have got to know what was the point of these questions?In post 180, Frogsterking wrote:Hey Frederick, I just thought of a couple of questions for you! Mainly because you replaced in recently and I noticed you had just finished moderating a game.
1) Have you noticed anything telling about lobbies on this site where all of the scum players became among the top 5 most active players in the game on D1?
and
2) Have you noticed anything telling about lobbies on this site where all of the scum players became among the top 5 most townread players in the game on D1?
I'll echo what others have said and say that I don't think it's scummy to give stats from a Normal game in a Newbie game. Newbies are scaled down Normals, right? Even if it doesn't scale perfectly, they're both preconstructed setups with an aim for balance, so there's still value in comparing them.In post 211, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Considering you didn't even use the right numbers for the generalized probability and you could have used https://www.dcode.fr/picking-probabilities or a similar selection probability calculator to easily re-calculate something at least distantly tangentially useful, I'm not pleased with this by any means.
(That generalized probability for a 7/2 setup, for the record, comes out to roughly a 27.7777...% chance of both scum being in a random given selection of five players. Which means your mistake was genuinely dangerous, potentially risking town deciding not to scum-hunt among actives.)
My vote stays on you.
After re-reading van's post 217, I disagree with most of his points. His strongest points are his last two paragraphs, but I disagree with his push. However, I'm not scumreading him for it at this point.
I think that Van spelled it out pretty clearly. It's not theIn post 218, shellyc wrote:Hey Van! Welcome to the thread.
What did you mean by "better ways to get info than voting randomly"? In this site, we usually start by throwing around random votes. In a low information stage,what else can we do to get info? I respect any suggestions you may propose.votingin RVS that matters, it's how people REACT to the voting. Isn'tnotvoting just as powerful of a statement, given that we can see the reactions to it? The more I think about it, the more I am thinking that it's not anti-town to not vote in the RVS stage.
Okay, it came up again. Yes, voting is good, because we need votes to lynch scum. I don't think it's fair for you to say the same about voting in RVS. We aren't going to (and shouldn't) lynch anyone in RVS. I'm not saying I agree with Frogster's decision to not vote in RVS. I'm not saying that I disagree with your decision to vote for Frogster because of it. But I think you're conflating here the importance of voting vs the importance of voting in RVS. The former being necessary and the latter being preferable.In post 221, MagikHorse wrote:
Is there some reason not to use your vote? Even if its totally random you should probably be trying to do something with it. Even if it's not the most effective, doing something with it is better than doing nothing.In post 217, van wrote:I don't like 41, for a couple of reasons:
1. There are many better ways to get information other than voting randomly. The statement made about "voting is the only way for town to make any headway" is both a stretch and an overreaction to a non-issue.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
"Not voting would get less info than voting". Not necessarily, I'm not sure why you make this out to be so black and white.In post 227, shellyc wrote:
Well, not voting would get less info than voting. You vote for someone. Not voting votes no one.In post 226, Redados wrote:I think that Van spelled it out pretty clearly. It's not the voting in RVS that matters, it's how people REACT to the voting. Isn't not voting just as powerful of a statement, given that we can see the reactions to it? The more I think about it, the more I am thinking that it's not anti-town to not vote in the RVS stage.
Mush is right when she says this:
This is exactly what I was trying to say, thank you.In post 229, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:See, all this talk about voting in RVS or not is circling an important, valuable point: all useful information comes from getting reactions. Everyone can agree on that so far, it is the one universal.
There are many, many ways to get reactions. And THAT is the goal.
This is pretty interesting/insightful, and I feel a little called out here because this is what I am doing with Shelly right now. I don't think it'sIn post 229, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:If I feel like I have a very weak scumread and a whole bunch of nulls, why on earth would I just stay on my scumread early in the game and ignore everything else going on, Shelly? That's a surefire way to miseliminate. So I'll press where I feel will build my reads fastest, and sometimes that's on the other side of the board, sometimes not.wrongnecessarily to just keep your vote on your scumread, because that's what I'm doing right now. But I also don't think it's wrong to use your vote effectively to push and gain information. Basically I don't agree or disagree with your premise but it made me think.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I'm not sure if I would go as far as calling at AI but I believe that it is anti-town and unhelpful toIn post 244, shellyc wrote:
2. You then said I was prone to winning arguments. I don't consider it scummy -In post 242, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Finally, why do you think that initial interaction with you seems like scum trying to pressure you?wanting to win argumentsisn't AI at allalwaystry and win arguments.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Can you again walk me through why sharing these reads doesn't help the town? How does it help the town for you to keep your reads close to your chest?In post 258, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I'm going to post my first public read: I think Frogsterking is town. If he isn't town, he's unreadable. I think his playstyle edges a bit toward anti-town overall, he's focused on game-solving over scum-hunting, but scum has no reason to give town a weapon like that paper. Arguably against their win condition to do so.
I'll note this read is conditional: his anti-town behavior is consistently game-solving (which comes from a town direction) and his towniness is based on a single event that gives away a lot of cover for lurker scum. It's a strong town read, but it isn't unbreakable.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I think it could be slightly AI. Posting a paper is pro-town. Yes, scum wants to act pro-town. But town has more incentive to act pro-town.In post 262, shellyc wrote:
Posting a paper is NAI. Scum appears as town-helping. I don't know why you consider that AI - scum could dig up a paper and make a compelling case as well.In post 258, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I'm going to post my first public read: I think Frogsterking is town. If he isn't town, he's unreadable. I think his playstyle edges a bit toward anti-town overall, he's focused on game-solving over scum-hunting, but scum has no reason to give town a weapon like that paper. Arguably against their win condition to do so.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I want to acknowledge thatIn post 298, ItalianoVD wrote:...
- Redados - Aside from playing like he did last game, I feel Redados is town here. His questioning, logic, and posting has felt very town. He doesn’t go with the crowd and isn’t scared to disagree with anyone, SE or not. That’s someone that won’t be manipulated.
Ifeel like my play is worse than last game. I am having a much harder time reading people and having conversations with people. Last game I felt like I had a better handle on what was going on, and I'm humbled by how few reads I have at this moment. I wanted to acknowledge that. But I appreciate your words.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Rocknil, read Newbie 2019: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=83700In post 301, Redados wrote:Rocknil, have you read any games here? I recommend picking a short complete game to read over. Inactivity is okay in certain circumstances but you have to make sure that you are making pro-town contributions by making infrequent large posts etc
It's short (relative to some other games) and it includes three players from this game.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
If Italiano is scum then the odds of him scumbuddying up to me are maybe eighty percent.In post 304, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Redados, I'm not sharing my read on you yet, but... presuming you are town, how likely do you think it is that ItalianoVD is scum buddying up to you? Genuine question. Oh, and do show your work, too, explain why and how you come to your conclusion!
If Italiano is not scum then the odds of him townreading me vocally are also maybe eighty percent. This is in the vein of something I said earlier in the game but I feel that the more I post, the more obvious it becomes that I am town. Last game, Italiano initially scumread me but the more I posted the more he townread me (I may be oversimplifying a little bit).
Therefore, I don't think his behavior is AI.
I also have a neutral read on Italiano right now, I haven't seen him post or interact enough to have a read on him.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
To me, this request isn't helpful. If/when people scumread me, I won't jump down their throats to hear all of their points so that I can go through them point by point and PROVE that I'm not scum. That isn't feasible/helpful.In post 316, shellyc wrote:
Make your case on me. I will defend myself, because I am a townie. I want to hear your case on me.In post 315, Redados wrote:I would be fine limming rocknil or Frederick A Campbell, but I would rather lim Shelly. I'm not sure I could see myself limming a different player at this point.Again,my preference when I'm being scumread is to keep posting, because that's how I prove that I am town.
That may have been my initial read, but it is developing (or else I am tunneling). You have a couple of anti-town tendencies. For example, you are quite defensive. You say this is not AI. We can go back and forth whether or not it is AI, but it is anti-town. Another example is that you yell at people for scumslipping. That is also not super helpful. Maybe it could be helpful, but not in the way that you go about it. To get back to the meta read, you did this last game and you were scum.In post 316, shellyc wrote:Your case is "Oh shelly is scum because they are playing so similar to last game" which is faulty meta analysis. I can play like scum when I'm town because you've never seen a town game from me.
You say that my case on you is that you are playing similar to last game and you were scum. My actual "case" on you (which is less of a case and more of a scumread) is that you are playing in a similar, anti-town way to last game and you were scum last game.
I wouldn't say that admitting a mistake is AI, but I think that it's pro-town for me to accept that I was wrong about something and admit it.In post 328, shellyc wrote:
Can't scum admit that they made a mistake? Town would push their suspect and would backtrack if they think their target is town, but won't scum do the same? Explain a little more clearly.In post 327, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
It is his willingness to admit that he made a mistake.In post 326, shellyc wrote:
Any reasoning behind it? What posts do you see that display a townie mindset?In post 325, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Still looking into ISOs. As of right now, I am town-reading Redados, but I'm not done with it yet.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
1. Not wanting to be eliminated is NAI. Being defensive =/= not wanting to be eliminated. Nobody wants to be eliminated. Not everyone is defensive when they get one or two votes.In post 333, shellyc wrote:
1. I am defensive because I fear being scumread, as me being scumread is aIn post 329, Redados wrote:hat may have been my initial read, but it is developing (or else I am tunneling). You have a couple of anti-town tendencies. For example, you are quite defensive. You say this is not AI. We can go back and forth whether or not it is AI, but it is anti-town. Another example is that you yell at people for scumslipping. That is also not super helpful. Maybe it could be helpful, but not in the way that you go about it. To get back to the meta read, you did this last game and you were scum.
You say that my case on you is that you are playing similar to last game and you were scum. My actual "case" on you (which is less of a case and more of a scumread) is that you are playing in a similar, anti-town way to last game and you were scum last game.step closer to a miseliminate.Fearing a miseliminate is not anti town.
2. I only said the word "scumslip"oncein this game. It was directed at Mush for not voting their biggest scumread. I misunderstood it - town often do scummy things, and town could act anti town sometimes
I will repeat this one more time. Just because I did these things as scum doesn't mean I can't do these things as town. My tendencies happenas both alignments.But I will reflect on my behaviour if you call it anti-town.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
My point was "you did x so I scumread you". Your response was "I only did x once". I don't concede your point. One action is NAI, a pattern is a read, like I explained before.In post 346, shellyc wrote:
So you concede my second point? One single NAI behaviour = scumread?In post 339, Redados wrote:1. Not wanting to be eliminated is NAI. Being defensive =/= not wanting to be eliminated. Nobody wants to be eliminated. Not everyone is defensive when they get one or two votes.
pedit: new guy has a very topical username for world events- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
You flipped at... E-3? That's a little soon. You're not that close to being limmed. I don't know if you're scum but this type of play is not helping the town.In post 351, shellyc wrote:
I am the scum lynchbait. OK I get it we need to eliminate someone. I have been not playing very well this game. I understand the reasons that I may come off as anti town. I will willingly sacrifice myself if you want to get the wagon starting.In post 342, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Second reframe: Shelly is a high information target for elimination, MagikHorse is not. MagikHorse has done far less interacting with the majority of players, more bouncing off of them than pushing anything too hard. Since Frogster’s MagikHorse vote is in part based on scum-interpreted Shelly interactions, I would recommend her over him.
Keep in mind I will flip green. I will 100% flip green. If that removes Redados and Italiano's paranoia, feel free to lynch me. If that gives us info, feel free to lynch me.
Remember to analyse my wagon - I am pretty sure scum will be on it. Remember if you eliminate me today and miseliminate tomorrow, it would soon be LimLo (assuming scum get the nightkills in between)
I understand that my death might bring good to the town. I will self vote if you wish.
You are not lynchbait. Rocknil is the best case for lynchbait right now, if I'm using that term right.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Yes. You are my scumread. I would like the town to lim you. If you are scum, you can keep voting yourself. If you are town, you should unvote.In post 373, shellyc wrote:
So you literally wanted the wagon to go on me... and then criticised me for voting myself?In post 364, Redados wrote:Shelly. Unvote. Voting for yourself is anti-town if you are town.
There was no pressure on you. You had two votes: one from me (which has been there since very early) and one from Fredrick A Campbell, who is in the lynchpool of several players. That's nothing!!! You were not looking like the likely lim! And then you roleflipped for no reason way too early and voted for yourself. Voting for yourself and rushing the lim is anti-town behavior. We still have 48 hours to lim. And again I want to stress that you were NOT the likely lim.
Nobody else was close to being limmed because we still have time and we're making a decision.In post 375, shellyc wrote:
You just said it's protown if I'm scum. Well, as nobody else was closed to being limmed I was starting the wagon on myself. We have to flip someone.In post 370, Redados wrote:You flipped at... E-3? That's a little soon. You're not that close to being limmed. I don't know if you're scum but this type of play is not helping the town.
You are not lynchbait. Rocknil is the best case for lynchbait right now, if I'm using that term right.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Uh, because your previous slot had only one post, so I want to see what you think of that one post that your slot previously made.In post 377, LavarManos wrote:Redados, why do you want me to comment on the post of my own slot?
shellyc, I am catching up. It is quite late for me, but i will be sure to get my thoughts in before the deadline.
This is not pocketing/buddying, this is pressure. Italiano owes us more posts and more thoughts. He hasn't been very active this game and he's been slipping under the radar for it. He gave his lynchpool but hasn't been keeping up since then. But he was upfront that he is busy on weekends so I am acknowledging that.In post 378, shellyc wrote:
What is this pocketing / buddying of Italiano? That's just plain weird.In post 376, Redados wrote:ItalianoVD has said that he won't be able to be active on weekends, so I want to hear a full list of impressions and thoughts first thing Monday!!- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Did Shelly sheep this?In post 341, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I will not no-eliminate on Day 1, I will not do it. I will go so far as to say I will self-hammer before I do it. If that’s what is required to get a wagon to elimination, by god I will push myself to the gallows.
(I agree with mislim over no lim though of course, just pointing this out)
I'm re-reading the thread and this stuck out to me.In post 318, ItalianoVD wrote:Yeah unfortunately I have been scumread in all the games I’ve played on this site. Even in the other forums I’ve been a part of I am generally looked at as more wolfy than villagery. I’ve been told it’s the way I read people and how I post. shelly, I actually only truly town read 3 players (Redados, Frogsterking and Frederick). I could I’ve been right a larger percentage of the time in my history, but I can still be wrong here. It’s the scumreading I still have a problem with. But those are simply the three players I wouldn’t be comfortable eliminating today.
I would like to point out that ItalianoVD was universally townread for the back half of day one in Newbie 2019. So I'm not sure how this looks.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
That's fair, there is just a really nice quote that stood out to me that I remember from that game:In post 389, Frogsterking wrote:and @redados i think what italiano said is consistent
In post 389, SJReaver wrote:Greetings and salutations!
I just finished my first game and enjoyed it so much that I wanted to jump right into another.
I wanted to share my thoughts and feelings so far. You see, I've skimmed this thread a few times! (Mostly to see the strange bean pictures, but I read things too)
Italian-guyis town - he is the most towniest person in this thread. Open, engaged, flexible, and spontaneous. It's like watching a puppy-dog play in the snow.
---
While I'm here, enjoy some lava flow.
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
I agree with mislim over no lim. That's pro-town play.In post 396, shellyc wrote:
I agree with mislim over no lim as well. So you are saying you are sheeping as well.In post 387, Redados wrote:Did Shelly sheep this?
(I agree with mislim over no lim though of course, just pointing this out)
You sheeped the "I will vote for myself before no lim", arguably.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Would you mind fleshing out this thought a little more? Your vote put yourself at E-2, and I already had a vote on you. If I were scum, the other scum vote could not have limmed you. So how is quickhammering relevant?In post 406, shellyc wrote:IMO Redados actually looks more town to me now. their reaction to my self-vote seemed town; scum would latch onto that and quickhammer me.
In the last game I played, this wasn't really an issue. In the final 48 hours or so, we got three separate people to E-1 before limming. Is this not common? We learned a lot from those interactions.In post 410, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I'm putting this out there: we have 48 hours and some change. If we can get a Shelly elimination right now, let's dial back and start re-reading the past little bit of play and putting pressure where it needs to be for Day 2.
Caveat: UNLESS every active player can agree on a different target from Shelly when the time window is closer, Shelly MUST be the elimination.
That means we don't try and go for targets we begin to think are better. That sort of last minute cat herding is a terrible, terrible plan and will end in no-elimination.
Can we agree on that? Can we scum hunt while the clock runs down some, or do we need to start pushing for either Shelly or Rocknil as policy eliminations (since they're equal in "will be voted for gladly" numbers right now)?
I, for one, will vote Shelly to end the day with an actual elimination. I will vote just about anyone to do that, really, but I'm laying it down in writing: I will vote that wagon for an elimination. Unless there is overwhelming consensus to vote for someone else instead of Shelly just before the deadline, I will stand by that.
ISOs are pretty time consuming, and it's hard for me toIn post 414, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I only finished going through Redados ISO and how long it took me to do so is reminding me why I usually don't go through ISOs to ascertain alignment. I have found that typically I only remember the last thing made me conclude someone is a certain alignment instead of every little detail before that that brought me to the conclusion unless I take notes while reading through, which I didn't and on second thought should have.determine alignmentbased on an ISO. How I used them last game was more to get reads and remind myself of certain events that happen. It's great that you're coming at it from an analytical perspective, but I'm not sure if that's efficient or optimal.
I don't think less of you for not scumreading Shelly, because I do feel that it's a meta read to some extent. However, I really would say that not wanting to be hanged is NAI (Not Alignment Indicative). No one wants to be hang, no matter their alignment. If you're town, it hurts yourself to be mislimmed. If you're scum it hurts yourself to lose a member of scum.In post 418, LavarManos wrote:I think shellyc is behaving rather townily because of her utter willingness to be the hang. However, some of you have said that she played similarly in your last game with her? That doesn't make me feel as good.
Right now, I have Italiano, MUSH, and shelly(tentatively) as town. I have Redados, Frogster, and Fredrick in my null pile. I am fine with hanging either MagikHorse or rocknil. MagikHorse because I think he has been mostly unoffensive in his posts and I noticed he tends to react to other people instead of bringing up new things. I think scum would take this route more often than not because it's quite safe and it's easy to get townread for it. rocknil because he isn't doing much.
As an aside, I suggest that you create an avatar! It makes it easy for me to follow your posts.- Redados
-
Redados Mafia Scum
- Redados
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: July 11, 2020
Shelley's actions are NAI (although arguably anti-town). She did THE same thing during day one of newbie 2019 where she appealed to emotion in the same way and it appeared very genuine.In post 423, MagikHorse wrote:
I wish I could say I saw this coming, but I didn't see this coming. Even then it feels like an emotional player caught up in frustration trying to be helpful in the wrong way?In post 353, shellyc wrote:If we lim rocknil we get 0 associative tells as they have only townread Mush (which was pretty much universal anyways)
If we lim me you get an abundance of tells and analysis. I guess I will get my own wagon starting. Good luck to y'all tomorrow. My pure town energy will be in the dead thread.
Vote:shellyc
You guys are right on Rocknil though. CLATS is not a great scenario without supporting reasons. - Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados
- Redados