Mini Normal 2159 | Cinder Block Mafia | Game Over!
Forum rules
- Raya36
-
Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I've played a decent amount for about 3 years on and off. I'm better at finding town than I am scum so I tend to town hunt instead. I get quite nervous as scum. I tend to tunnel people I think are scum. Motivation is the most important thing to look for in general in my opinionIn post 15, ItalianoVD wrote:I know a few players in the playerlist (SJReaver, Frogsterking, & Walter)
I don’t know the others, but this is for everyone...
1. What is your mafia experience?
2. What is your play style strength(s)? Weakness(es)? Do you know?
3. In your opinion, what is the most important thing to look for while scumhunting? While townreading?- Raya36
-
Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
The interaction between Reaver and Walter at 31 felt weird or awkward maybe. Almost felt like maybe Walter was going for a push but then backed off when Reaver responded. I got the same feeling from 67.
callforjudgement's huge post 50 was a lot. I don't townread it but don't necessarily scum read it either. I just think it's something scum could do to try to take the credit of getting us out of rvs which is what seemed to be happening (55). After reading more it feels like he's either town tryharding or scum trying way too hard to be 'obvtown'. Time will tell.
I kinda like Banana for town. Just as an early gut read.
VOTE: callforjudgement- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
You're right that asking questions is more helpful than nothing but what was done could so easily have been done as scum too. 142 and 147 are NAI.In post 172, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:oh,
Because I thought the memes and bruhs were not as helpful overall.
But asking qs is more helpful than nothing.
pedit
slight on sou
Very slight on sj but could just be her posting style.
Just a lot of nulls right now due to people like nm or people who have not been on.
Can you explain the slight scumreads?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Nothing yet. I need time to read RCE. I don't think I could get a reliable read D1In post 173, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Raya, what do you make of Rce?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Notice how I use my vote to put more pressure on callforjudgement to see if anything comes from it and I question and interact with Walter. I can't vote both so I picked the one to interact with that I think I'd learn more from that way and voted the one that would make a wagonIn post 190, geraintm wrote:
I don't get why it is odd?In post 162, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:That post by frog seems really weird considering the fact that it was his second post all game. Something to keep an eye on.
N_m do you have any thoughts on the playerbase other than you are proud of the fact you caught scum D1.
I don't get the vote. froma read where you say it is either A or B, you pretty hard veer into BIn post 165, Raya36 wrote:The interaction between Reaver and Walter at 31 felt weird or awkward maybe. Almost felt like maybe Walter was going for a push but then backed off when Reaver responded. I got the same feeling from 67.
callforjudgement's huge post 50 was a lot. I don't townread it but don't necessarily scum read it either. I just think it's something scum could do to try to take the credit of getting us out of rvs which is what seemed to be happening (55). After reading more it feels like he's either town tryharding or scum trying way too hard to be 'obvtown'. Time will tell.
I kinda like Banana for town. Just as an early gut read.
VOTE: callforjudgement
and that is a really obvious sucking up to Banana
but then this from Walter, sucking up to Raya sucking up to Banana....well lets just say I have noticed thisIn post 168, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:hmm
I see where you come from on that.
I think he is a town lean for me because of his more recent posts like 142 and 147.
How is stating a town lean sucking up to someone?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I will agree with this though. If Walter is scum I could see him doing this to try to get rid of my scumlean on him.In post 190, geraintm wrote:a
but then this from Walter, sucking up to Raya sucking up to Banana....well lets just say I have noticed thisIn post 168, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:hmm
I see where you come from on that.
I think he is a town lean for me because of his more recent posts like 142 and 147.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
And then backing off real quick when his pushes are retaliated on. I'd have to look into his meta and see if this is how he normally plays. Someone just mentioned he tends to get miselimedIn post 217, BananaCucho wrote:
I do get the feeling that Woolter is trying not to rock the boat much. Like he's asking questions and probing but most of them are softballs.In post 165, Raya36 wrote:The interaction between Reaver and Walter at 31 felt weird or awkward maybe. Almost felt like maybe Walter was going for a push but then backed off when Reaver responded. I got the same feeling from 67.
callforjudgement's huge post 50 was a lot. I don't townread it but don't necessarily scum read it either. I just think it's something scum could do to try to take the credit of getting us out of rvs which is what seemed to be happening (55). After reading more it feels like he's either town tryharding or scum trying way too hard to be 'obvtown'. Time will tell.
I kinda like Banana for town. Just as an early gut read.
VOTE: callforjudgement- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Tell me what's bad about 91. And what bait posts?In post 226, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:
For Sj it it the bait posts and posts like 91 that don;t solve but say look scummy.In post 206, Raya36 wrote:
You're right that asking questions is more helpful than nothing but what was done could so easily have been done as scum too. 142 and 147 are NAI.In post 172, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:oh,
Because I thought the memes and bruhs were not as helpful overall.
But asking qs is more helpful than nothing.
pedit
slight on sou
Very slight on sj but could just be her posting style.
Just a lot of nulls right now due to people like nm or people who have not been on.
Can you explain the slight scumreads?
is that an actual claim sj in 216?
Alright for sou, it is the progression from 79 where he will go back and reread and then 117 where he agrees with a post but does not offer any solving or anything at all.
I have to say that I read frog as scum now.
I find 150 to be really weird case to make this late, now maybe that was when he online next. but it seems kinda wifomy.
But then his most recent posts put nomafia as town antitown???
I read that slot as null.
But the case on nosferatu seems forced and an overread into a slot that has not been on.
VOTE: Frogster- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Do you think claiming scum more likely comes from scum though? Especially from someone new?In post 230, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:What is bad from my perspective of 91 is the second part on the part about tomorrownow she may have picked up a scum italiano but it does not seem helpful. K, enthuisiastic, yes.
The come get me scum posts that are 112 113 and 114, and 115 where she says she is scum.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
The third from Walter felt like trying to fit inIn post 240, Gamma Emerald wrote:
His explicitly comes off as wasting timeIn post 220, BananaCucho wrote:
Why would you call this out but not call me out for doing the exact same thing?In post 191, Gamma Emerald wrote:
VOTE: WaltherIn post 48, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:5.
No.
Here I developed some even better questions!
1. Is it okay to put rotting produce into an uncooked stead as a filler?
What is the cinderblock you would like most as a pet?
Are pineapples good on pizzas?
Now you’re just wasting time and space with this
I disagree with any notion of "wasting time" when we have 2 week long days lol
You just seem like a less serious person in general
But to elaborate, the prolonging of the RQS came off as scum who didn’t have a good transition into the full game yet. One was alright and the first was some good questions, the second had less compelling questions but felt orderly enough to not bother me. The third was super random and out of place imo.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
No, I clearly stated in a post who the two people are I think could be scum (Walter and Judgement) and I explained why for each. I switched from Judgement to Walter because my vote was doing nothing and would be more powerful on a wagonIn post 309, SJReaver wrote:
So you voted for Walter because other people were voting for him?In post 299, Raya36 wrote:There's no wagon on callforjudgement anymore while there is on Walter. Plus I can barely read judgements posts so I need to go back through later- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
This is scummyIn post 334, Nosferatu wrote: im so over this bullshit read my town pm and weep
VOTE: nosferatu
if ur on this wagon you suck at this game
it is anti-town wincon to bleed town d1 and you know it cfg, and that bullshit abt consequences of being on whats basically an rvs wagon is ridiculous- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Do you usually get this frustrated when wagoned early on? It's reading as an act to meIn post 365, Nosferatu wrote:if i get wagoned for dumb shit like this its obvious im not gonna have the agency i want later on so id rather get it over with now and just go next- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
It might be a playstyle thing for him but he seems to choose his words too carefully and to be trying too hard to appear obvtown. There's a difference between being too towny and appearing to be trying to be too towny. There's a paranoid part of me that thought when he was discussing how scum lurking by making meaningless posts is optimal, he was trying to say that's what he would do as scum, then do the opposite to appear town.In post 384, Gamma Emerald wrote:Is cfj seriously being wagoned for being “too towny”?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Idk if this is real but why Gamma?
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
How was that a dodge? You self-voted, I find self-votes to be scummy. You're frustrating read as fake
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
That's true. Ok self votes are always anti-town. And I read this particular time as scummyIn post 415, geraintm wrote:
They arent pro townIn post 409, Raya36 wrote:selfvotes are always scummy- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I can see it the same way as you. Calling my post a dodge felt like deflection.In post 421, Nosferatu wrote:
just a preferenceIn post 412, Gamma Emerald wrote: Just as personal preference, or are you better as a player in late game?
i literally wanted to just get eliminated to spite the town lol ive done it as scum for AtE but its never been called out as such its not really all that deepItalianoVD wrote:
I don’t know if it’s only a scum based action, but definitely anti-town. On that noteIn post 409, Raya36 wrote:selfvotes are always scummy
@Nosferatu: what purpose does it serve besides ATE? Which is not helping town, but helping yourself? With the numbers the way it is a townie elimination on Day 1 will not break or lose the game for town. I know play styles/personality have a lot to do with how players react to pressure and wagons being formed on them, etc., but your action seemed fake and forced (scum) or at the very least bad unhelpful play (townie)
i literally didn't ask your opinion on self-votesRaya36 wrote:How was that a dodge? You self-voted, I find self-votes to be scummy. You're frustrating read as fake
the fact that you feel the need to back up ur opinion after i call ur post scummy is v interesting- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
No but he's building up a wagon and suspicion so he could easily have faked the frustration (with the self vote to emphasize) to appear more townIn post 427, BananaCucho wrote:
The day is so early though. Why is this scummy in this instance? What's the play? There's till so much time left for day 1, his lunch is in no way a forgone conclusionIn post 423, Raya36 wrote:
That's true. Ok self votes are always anti-town. And I read this particular time as scummyIn post 415, geraintm wrote:
They arent pro townIn post 409, Raya36 wrote:selfvotes are always scummy- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Its deflection because after calling your post scummy you immediately call mine scummy too. And it wasnt an absolutist statement considering people are arguing with meIn post 431, Nosferatu wrote:you call my post scummy --> i call your post scummy --> you make an absolutist statement that cannot be engaged with
who broke off the discussion? i think its u here- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Maybe I should reread but it came off as fake on my first readIn post 432, BananaCucho wrote:
The frustration feels genuine though - this whole thing started over basically nothing, pushed by Frog and then multiple people have piled onIn post 429, Raya36 wrote:
No but he's building up a wagon and suspicion so he could easily have faked the frustration (with the self vote to emphasize) to appear more townIn post 427, BananaCucho wrote:
The day is so early though. Why is this scummy in this instance? What's the play? There's till so much time left for day 1, his lunch is in no way a forgone conclusionIn post 423, Raya36 wrote:
That's true. Ok self votes are always anti-town. And I read this particular time as scummyIn post 415, geraintm wrote:
They arent pro townIn post 409, Raya36 wrote:selfvotes are always scummy- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Well good to know that I'm not going crazyIn post 435, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I think I know what you're trying to say, don't particularly agree, but it's not exactly a bad logicIn post 428, Raya36 wrote:A deflection from me calling your self vote scummy. I call your self vote scummy and you say me calling it that is scummy. Deflection.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I thought dayvig was a thing in normals :/In post 446, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay does no one know how the role rules work rn- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I kinda think this is town. Sounded very genuineIn post 497, geraintm wrote:
I think you underestimate how puzzled I can be by other players. I had had a conversation with them about how they knew someone had voted for scum, worked out they meant one exact vote on one exact player, and then they just went and vigged someone else. I wanted to know why. They explained and from then I was waiting for the mod to come along and flip the kill and then I would either shout at them for a terrible shot or congratulate them on their amazing aim (as I firmly believe if they had shot scum it was blind luck).In post 477, callforjudgement wrote:
Vigilante and Day Vigilante are normally considered different roles (you can also see a dayvig as Vigilante plus the Day modifier, but Day is abNormal).In post 467, geraintm wrote:I assumed it was real because I checked the wiki
Normal Guidelines
Vigilantes are considered Normal on mafiascum.net if their kill flavour is indistinguishable from other factions'. As of 9 November 2015, they must also be town aligned.
And i read that and went "oh..." but every game I play there seems to be a new role I've never played with before.
I wish people wouldn't lie fake claims just confuwe me. I'm a simple man and just want things kept all easy
Anyway, what's bothering me about this is: if you assumed that a dayvig is legal in Normals on the basis that it's a type of Vigilante, and that the dayvig shot were real, but were aware that Vigilantes were always town, surely you should have assumed that RCEnigma was confirmed town as a result?
There doesn't seem to be much reason to ask about the motivation of a "confirmed townie", unless you want their help sorting a slot (and in the hypothetical world where Gamma is "about to flip", there is absolutely no reason to try to scumhunt the slot, you just wait for the mod to get online). So in retrospect, this post looks more like you were trying to figure out how a townie would react to the dayvig, than actually reacting to the dayvig.In post 398, geraintm wrote:@RCenigma - you have call for judgement as scum, but you have just killed Gamma??
That is my honest explanation of what was going through my head at the time _ someone in very QuickTime trying to work out what exactly what going on, checking the wiki and all. I am not sure what you mean by scumhunting the slot (the person shot?) or trying to concoct a reaction to a day vig.
Have I explained myself well enough.
Your next post though confuses me, where you attack Walter for only interacting with me. You think you have found two scum in me and Walter?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Maybe I should specify that I'm more successful in townhunting (of course) but I still do both. Scumhunting generates more discussion than townhunting does so it's still necessaryIn post 501, Tayl0r Swift wrote:27 (reaver) pings me. let me give an excuse for not having any good reads before starting. also isnt pocketing something that only scum would have to do?
50 (judgement) strikes me as wayyy too tryhard for that stage in the game. overanalyzing that much doesnt feel natural. judgements later posts on that page also reek of teaching and trying to score easy townpoints.
74 raya is probably town
104 (italiano) is odd. pretty defensive and finger-pointy and generally sounds like scum trying to sound like theyre posting from a town mindset.
113 (reaver) uh excuse me? where is any of this coming from? booo. this long wall of posts has some good stuff but its too long and its making me suspicious.
150 (frogster) is a good one
152 (judgement) is a good response but NAI and proves that judgement is pretty self-aware in wording, so guess we will have to evaluate content rather than phrasing.
165 (raya) is interesting. raya said she townhunts, but is here pretty aggressive in scumhunting. hmm
180 (frog) is bad. frog seems to really be digging here.
i caught up to the top of page 9. more to come later.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Because my vote on you did nothing but sit there. You're the kind of player that doesn't need pressure to post more and also simply based on posting style I already know I'm going to have a lot of trouble reading and interacting with you. So it makes much more sense for my vote to be on Walter, not you.In post 507, callforjudgement wrote:In post 297, Raya36 wrote:I think Frog is probably town
also moving my vote somewhere more useful
VOTE: Walter
Based on this reasoning, why didn't you move your vote back onto me?In post 299, Raya36 wrote:There's no wagon on callforjudgement anymore while there is on Walter. Plus I can barely read judgements posts so I need to go back through later- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Can you explain this? I might be missing something because she seemed pretty town to meIn post 525, RCEnigma wrote:Damn. I really wanted my cfj read to be right, but Taylor is playing pretty on par with how i thought scum would rep in.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
How was it pr fishingIn post 589, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I feel a slight tr about the gerain slot after cfj's post and explanation. although such a defense of Gerain seemed very out of the blue.
I find this whole fake guilty thing to be highly suspicious and pr fishing.
I am really tired rn going to sleep.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Exactly my thoughtsIn post 596, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
yeah this. if anything you not being able to get the joke and trying to point out "suspicious" things like this is scummy.In post 591, Raya36 wrote:
How was it pr fishingIn post 589, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I feel a slight tr about the gerain slot after cfj's post and explanation. although such a defense of Gerain seemed very out of the blue.
I find this whole fake guilty thing to be highly suspicious and pr fishing.
I am really tired rn going to sleep.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
But how was it power role fishing?In post 599, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Because I don't see the purpose of a fake guilty, it just seems really odd to me.
I get it was a joke, but I am not sure of its usefulness.
pedit It does seem very nm, but the fact that it was prompted by nos though? hmm
Something to keep in mind.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
You can't see the side where it was just town joking/messing around? Or a town reaction test? Scum as far as I know actually aren't that likely to be so obvious when pr fishing. They don't want to openwolf unless that's the overall strategy they're going for. I'd expect them to he more subtle when fishing or not fish at allIn post 623, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Fake claiming cop.
I don’t see a purpose unless scum was trying to bait a reaction.
Try to see how town would react. Maybe draw a pr out. That was my thought. Although it Does come from two of the more anto town slots.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
So basically what you're trying to say is scum are happy with the current game state. And the current game state includes you being the top wagon. So you must be town because scum are happy with you being the top wagon and doing nothing about it... all I can read this as is a defense of yourself hidden in lots of words.In post 631, callforjudgement wrote:Something that's bothering me generally about this game: why is nobody making a serious effort to change the gamestate? In particular, why aren't thescummaking a serious effort to change the gamestate? In the situation we have at the moment, there are lots of impatient townies looking for something to do, and if someone made a serious and not-ridiculous case on a scumread of theirs, they would likely get a lot of votes following. That seems like a risky situation for scum if the scumread in question is correct, so I would have expected them to start a wagon of their own, or at least push mine harder. I can only see two real possibilities here; either a) scum are happy with the current gamestate (in which case we should be trying to change it!), or b) scum are not in the thread / out of their depth / have no idea what to do and are simply being inactive as a consequence (in which case we may be able to figure out who they are, directly or via PoE).
Meanwhile, I see attempts to shake things up (such as the whole daycop thing we had recently) that don't ultimately have a huge impact as being unlikely to be from scum; it mostly just helps to get information with which to read players more accurately without making long-term changes to the gamestate, and that seems to only help town.
There are still a lot of players who are alone on their wagons. If anyone's interested in persuading me (and the rest of us) to join them, I'd be interested to hear what you have to say! If not, I guess I'll try doing a full reread of everyone in order to come up with an updated reads list, because something has to happen to get this game moving again (I was hoping that the replacements would help in that respect, but that's going too slowly).- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I think the flaw is the wifom you've attached to it and looking at it from our point of view.In post 639, callforjudgement wrote:(PEDIT: re #638)
The reasoning should be correct regardless of my alignment. If you think there's a mistake, please point it out so that I can re-evaluate my reasoning.
I agree that it points towards me as town, but that's hardly a reason not to mention it in thread! Of course, it's harder to be objective about something when it points to you as town, so it's possible I have some confirmation bias here (i.e. "this correctly predicts me as town, so it's more likely to be correct"), in which case it's especially important that you point out any flaws in my reasoning! But "this reasoning benefits CFJ and CFJ is making it" is not a reason to ignore it or consider it invalid.
First, I have seen scum wagons sit around in a similar gamestate before. It's not nearly as common as town wagons but this doesn't entirely mean you're town.
Looking in from my point of view I see a player indirectly explaining why they must be town based on the gamestate. One way I can see it is this player is scum and for whatever reason (unhelpful scum mates, avoiding defending of scum mates, etc) has decided to defend himself but in a way that on face value doesn't appear to be a self defense. If someone else pointed it out it would appear more towny but the fact that it was you indirectly defending yourself adds wifom.
Of course I could also see it as town simply making an observation which would allow someone else come to the conclusion that it could point to them being town.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
cfj is one of my scumreads... and this was just an observation I made that supports thatIn post 646, RCEnigma wrote:
I see all of this as pointless since cfj isn't a wagon you entertained at it's height. Pushing this angle now is counterintuitive.In post 644, Raya36 wrote:
I think the flaw is the wifom you've attached to it and looking at it from our point of view.In post 639, callforjudgement wrote:(PEDIT: re #638)
The reasoning should be correct regardless of my alignment. If you think there's a mistake, please point it out so that I can re-evaluate my reasoning.
I agree that it points towards me as town, but that's hardly a reason not to mention it in thread! Of course, it's harder to be objective about something when it points to you as town, so it's possible I have some confirmation bias here (i.e. "this correctly predicts me as town, so it's more likely to be correct"), in which case it's especially important that you point out any flaws in my reasoning! But "this reasoning benefits CFJ and CFJ is making it" is not a reason to ignore it or consider it invalid.
First, I have seen scum wagons sit around in a similar gamestate before. It's not nearly as common as town wagons but this doesn't entirely mean you're town.
Looking in from my point of view I see a player indirectly explaining why they must be town based on the gamestate. One way I can see it is this player is scum and for whatever reason (unhelpful scum mates, avoiding defending of scum mates, etc) has decided to defend himself but in a way that on face value doesn't appear to be a self defense. If someone else pointed it out it would appear more towny but the fact that it was you indirectly defending yourself adds wifom.
Of course I could also see it as town simply making an observation which would allow someone else come to the conclusion that it could point to them being town.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Seemed like a pretty standard opening to me
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I explained it a bit before. It definitely is a bit of a weird case but I'm finding cfj very difficult to read properly and interact with which is kind of why I'm prioritizing Walter, and hoping to be able to get a better ready on cfj when there's more information D2.In post 651, RCEnigma wrote:
I get that. But one of your two scumreads has been close to elim for a few days now and you kinda just....opted to ignore the wagon as a whole until now. Which is cool, looks weird, but it's cool.In post 647, Raya36 wrote:cfj is one of my scumreads... and this was just an observation I made that supports that- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Not sure I know THE reason but I can see possible ways to read her play as scummy. Don't think I agree though.In post 690, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i still feel like cfj will be easy to evaluate after some flips, but is a bit messy today. i am suspicious, but dont want to lynch there today. that said, VOTE: shelly
i dont think its in town's best interest to discuss my vote movement at this time, but im happy to discuss the merits of a vote on shelly or the merits of a vote on walter. im guessing raya will understand what i mean based on past mind-melding at the very least.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I don't think your play is scummy but I see how it could be read as scummy.In post 700, shellyc wrote:
If you see my play as scummy, why do you not agree with the vote on me? Contradiction.In post 699, Raya36 wrote:Not sure I know THE reason but I can see possible ways to read her play as scummy. Don't think I agree though.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
This makes no sense and could be read as you trying to form a case out of nothing. Or maybe you were having trouble as scum to find something to scumread/comment on. It's also much more difficult for scum to look at someone who is town and make up reasons for them to be scummy. This could be read as grasping at straws.In post 653, shellyc wrote:
The unvote didn't alert me. The uptight entrance of "reading" did. The tone to me was almost like reading the thread was a burden to them.In post 652, geraintm wrote:huh?
A vote on Italiano is kind of opportunistic if they're town.
The cfj part is quite surface levelIn post 691, shellyc wrote:
CFJ's posting is confusing, but confident and I think I see a town mindsetIn post 690, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i still feel like cfj will be easy to evaluate after some flips, but is a bit messy today. i am suspicious, but dont want to lynch there today. that said, VOTE: shelly
i dont think its in town's best interest to discuss my vote movement at this time, but im happy to discuss the merits of a vote on shelly or the merits of a vote on walter. im guessing raya will understand what i mean based on past mind-melding at the very least.
I'm fine if you want to park your vote on me. My pure town energy will shine through.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Actually I don't think this post comes from scum. This shows a true scumhunting mindset that I think would be really hard to replicate as scum, especially in that case knowing that the players in question are town.In post 713, callforjudgement wrote:
This statement really got me thinking. If you haven't already, I recommend reading Italiano and Walter in double ISO, following how they interact with each other.In post 681, Tayl0r Swift wrote:also worth noting that italiano is taking this opportunity of pressure on him and plausible counterwagon and NOT being opportunistic.
The first wagon on Walter starts at #238 by Nosferatu. Italiano's next post, #266, is denouncing it. (At the time, I assumed that this was Italiano reading the situation the same way I was, and townread Italiano for it. I think I was wrong, though.)
Italiano had previously implied a townread or at least "no reason to think scum" read on Nosferatu (#234).
Walter attacked Nosferatu around the time Nosferatu voted Walter (#249, #257, #278).
Soon after, Italiano was attacking Nosferatu too (#281, vote in #294).
The Nosferatu wagon sits at four votes for a while. Then I derail it, based primarily on a gut read (#367).
Italiano places a (what is to me) surprising scumread on me in #381 and vote in #382. (This is the third vote, after RCEnigma and Nosferatu.)
Walter does not join this wagon (although he does ask lots of questions about it, that's natural when it's the largest wagon).
Eventually Walter calls me "70% certainty" of town (#614); this is technically a mild scumread (assuming a 10:3 setup, a hypothetically town Walter would think a perfectly null read was 75% likely to be town.)
The CFJ wagon sits at four votes for a while.
Then it starts shrinking, as Tayl0r moves to Walter (#634); that wagon's now the same size as mine (N_M voted Walter in #600).
Italiano reacts surprisingly strongly to this (#655), in effect complaining that the wagons should be on me and/or Nosferatu.
Italiano then defends Walter by attacking the wagon (#674, #675).
Walter earlier agreed with me that #655 is scummy (#659), but doesn't vote for Italiano.
As Tayl0r pointed out, there is notable pressure on Italiano but he has no interest at all in the counterwagon on Walter (instead, he's primarily been attacking me).
What I get out of all this is that Italiano is focused quite heavily on defending Walter. Whenever there's a wagon on Walter, Italiano votes the counterwagon (except that with this most recent wagon, the counterwagon to Walter is Italiano himself, and his response is to complain that people aren't on the wagons that previously collapsed!). Basically every time anyone scumreads Walter, Italiano attacks theread(but Italiano has only twice actually called Walter town, placing him top of a townread list in #381, without explanation; and giving a gut townread in #687). The attacks tend to be with weak or no reasoning, too (e.g. #674 attacks a read as "sheeping Not_Mafia", and you can't really sheep someone who never explains).
I think the most plausible explanations for all this are:
a) Italiano and Walter are scum together.
b) Italiano is scum (with Walter town), and wants everyone to think that Walter is scum alongside him, in the hope that we end up voting out Walter and Italiano can end up being vindicated by the townflip.
In either case, though, Italiano ends up as being scum. Unless someone can find meta evidence otherwise, I don't think it makes sense for a hypothetically town Italiano to defend Walterthishard based only on a gut read.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I wouldn't say the first but it's the one that shows that quality the strongest to me.In post 763, Nosferatu wrote:
would u say this is the first post from cfg u find to exhibit this qualityIn post 761, Raya36 wrote:Actually I don't think this post comes from scum. This shows a true scumhunting mindset that I think would be really hard to replicate as scum, especially in that case knowing that the players in question are town.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
How is it not scumhunting? It's a timeline used to introduce and explain a scumreadIn post 767, Nosferatu wrote:it is a totally average NAI post its not even scumhunting its literally a (totally skewed) timeline but yall wanna pretend it totally spews town like uhh what- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
No. I'm saying one of those two are probably scum. But that is an interesting theory considering the idea that the elimination was scum drivenIn post 877, Looker wrote:
So you're saying both scum bussed shelly?In post 871, Raya36 wrote:I feel like there's a pretty good chance scum is between cfj or Walter though - Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36