Mini Theme 2161: Undertale C Open - Chara's Folly
Forum rules
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
In post 30, Prism wrote:I really don't want to punch EVs but if no one else will I'll do it later. Probably going to push for 4 spare again.
Wave acknowledged. I'm tired and will be in tomorrow.
I have thoughts but don't want to out just yetIn post 32, redtea wrote:the custom tags are neato.
Sorry to break the fun but
i read the setup going in. Somehow I was very confident. I am no longer confident.
Is the purpose of fighting only for info? Is 0 or 4 spares the ideal??- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
( ´_ノ` ) Well yes, genocide route is obviously superior and pacifism sucks eggs in this version of the setup, I was just hoping we might get more info by not immediately settling on a path and seeing who people wanted to spareIn post 38, Tanner wrote:i also Have Thoughs, we should do genocide.
hi!! they say you can't lynch a puppy, but can you Fight a puppy?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
( ̄▽ ̄)ノ 0 spares is better EXCEPT for the specific instance we reach 5p with 2 mafia alive, at which point sparing someone gives 2 reveals and a guaranteed 33% chance of town winning (whereas normally in that situation it would be 2/5*1/2 = 20%)
I could post the math if anyone demands I show my work (I ran the numbers pregame and am very grateful to have rolled town here) but really just want to move on from this as fast as possible~- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
o(^・x・^)o Didn't like the immediate townread on you for a post that looked null to me and the big pile of questions looked like posturingIn post 68, Tanner wrote:yeah, that's what i was thinking, but haven't ran the numbers because lazy.
wanna talk to me about your vote on puppy?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
No, that's right, it's 31% EV, literally worse than the EV you'd have if we mis-executed 3 times in a row. It's pre-emptively shooting yourself in the foot. Genocide route EV is 47%, and it goes higher if you factor in the ability to spare in a 3v2 endgame scenario, above 50%In post 114, Prism wrote:Alright well my numbers differ from Hectic's (31% town win for 4 spare) but I still don't think it's optimal and I'm tired of typing a line of 50 fractions into Google that are probably wrong (45%+ w/r for four eliminations is almost certainly wrong) so I'm throwing my computer out the window and calling it a day for now.
someone call me when RVS is over I haven't played that phase in years
HURT: catboi deliberately misleading line is assigning intent that I don't really think is there
I was going to do a fancy table showing all the math but that would take way too much time so instead I'm just gonna post from my excel sheet, feel free to check my work
Pacifism Route:
Genocide Route:
(you might have to open the images in a new tab - forum is resizing them so they're harder to read
arguments about finding town being easier than finding scum are mostly fallacious arguments to probabilty, people just guess town more accurately because most people are town, and this willfully ignores the fact that scum are going to kill people off and you have to be near-perfect in your townreads to win via pacifism. arguments about chara associatives feel willfully disingenuous (you get the same associatives from a day 1 elimination without risk of an instant loss - scum don't want to bus chara)- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I shouldn't townread someone just for a strategy post but this makes me want toIn post 139, CantHateAPuppy wrote:townhunting is powerful, better than scumhunting imo, but we can townhunt inside the fight framework too. even if it's not as fun as doing somtehing different by sparing ( )- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
(ΦωΦ)For the record, I ran those numbers pregame and you should absolutely not townread effort in that vein, but the difference in EV is so significant that I wouldn't have bothered outing it as mafia because I'd be torpedoing my own team's chancesIn post 166, redtea wrote:All I got is: The quick estimate Pooky gave I do no give out town points for (regardless ty for your contribution) and the ones who went the extra mile (catboi, Prism). Maf wouldn't fuckin bother, or think to, anyway. Esp. with how "focusing on game mechanics" is looked at.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
In post 196, Elements wrote:you've been all "we must fight" "fighting is the only path" and now you're asking about sparesIn post 197, CantHateAPuppy wrote:YesIn post 198, Elements wrote:so your tune has changed....
LmfaoIn post 199, CantHateAPuppy wrote:No- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Don't want to drag this down too much further, but there is one, very specific case in which neutral is better, as I think I've said: if you get to 5p with 2 mafia still alive, you can spare someone, whoever you want (preferably your strongest read), and you get 2 free investigations, guaranteed, and town has a 1/3 shot of winning the game which isn't bad.In post 216, redtea wrote:
I'm going to reiterate @everyone is neutral route (combined spare/fight)In post 185, redtea wrote:Also correct me if I'm wrong but was there not a conclusion that taking the neutral route is the least useful @taylorswiftnot the worst possible route?
໒( ͡ᵔ ▾ ͡ᵔ )७ Sure thing, buddy.In post 222, Prism wrote:catboi I don't really scumread you and will probably move my vote soon, I think you can guess at my opinion of some of the last 2/3 pages but we should circle back later imo
I think he's entirely capable of that as scum and is willing to adapt to a game environment if necessary.In post 242, CantHateAPuppy wrote:i just kind of like that "trust in the heart of the cards" "i assert i am obvtown" vibe. maybe that's kind of weak? i like that he's voting to self-heal (im doing that too, i think it's the obvious play but scum wouldn't be bold enough to do) but i guess i also want to see if he has anyone he wants to spare now that i think about it
Are we supposed to reward people for their ability to write posts towncasing themselves? 「(゚<゚)゙??In post 247, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:each day only one contestant "nominates" themselves to be judged by the collective town - placing his fate in the hands of his peers.
He shall write a long post detailing why he is worthy of being spared and healed.
Then all players will vote on this person's candidacy - either heal or hurt and the day will end with his healing or hurting.
so only those of us with the most pure of hearts should try this- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
චᆽච Okay, lemme ask: how do you plan to get reads? what do you expect your process to be for playing mafia this game?In post 237, Tayl0r Swift wrote:nah but im mostly skimming the mech talk. im here to play mafia, and when you all are ready to do that let me know. unfortunately im not gonna be able to force myself to care about mech talk when its this mathematical. if the mechanics are simple and qualitative discussions are possible im here. but if you all wanna crunch numbers ill pass. i do enough number crunching outside this game already.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
.( ̵˃﹏˂̵ ) Are you a baddie this game, Lavender?In post 265, Lavender wrote:
I'm not good with Day 1s ah~
In the End We're Doing 1-3 Spares it Seems? (*o*)?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Meh, the mopiness isIn post 289, Prism wrote:Nifty hat. Well, don't mind me, just going to be opportunist scum parking on you knowing you won't really respond for three days.annoyingbut I don't know that it'sscummyand now that I take off the rage-goggles, even though we disagree on our approaches he seems to be making attempts to legitimately evaluate people
Ah, I misunderstood you. Still seems rather cavalier to have just casually suggested sparing 3 people so early on.In post 272, Elements wrote:
The vast majority of posts have just been about sparing. Only the one saying me, hectic, and pooky should be spared was pacifism indicative.In post 264, catboi wrote:@Elements:In your last Undertale setup game, as town you came out arguing hard against people wanting to go a pacifism route and argued about the downsides it had with regard to the lack of flips from voting. What's different now?
I also like to think I have matured as a player since then and my play style has changed. But that's self meta so feel free to ignore it
Well, 25% of the players in the game right now are scum, but it's probably not all the non-contributors. It's never that easy...usually.In post 294, Tanner wrote:i didn't think i'd ever have the urge to vig 1/3rd of the players in a given game, but it's actually happened.
m(*- -*)m Still haven't had time to put in a proper reading of the game, apologies. Hope to get to that soon~- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I just disagreed vehemently with the things you were arguing, is all. I'm over it now, though.In post 309, Hectic wrote:In post 306, catboi wrote:Meh, the mopiness is annoying but I don't know that it's scummy and now that I take off the rage-goggles, even though we disagree on our approaches he seems to be making attempts to legitimately evaluate people
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
pooky and lavender have decent chance, taylor being standoffish in an antagonistic way is mayyybe town? lavender probably doesn't know how to fake it and pooky is riding the spare thing way too hardIn post 347, Tanner wrote:what if... the scumteam was... exactly taylor/lavender/pooky .. aha ha, just kidding.. unless.. ?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Er, what's the approach I "should" take?In post 371, Prism wrote:catboi's reads and general approach haven't really been angling for anything here, and he's really taking his time and letting things play out.
I hate that he's likely to be town, just not really the approach he should take for this game as scum imo. Only thing I didn't like was the early Hectic "deliberate" accusation, and that's really plausible for towncat too- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I thought you were calling me out for slacking on this game and I liked that but the more I read this the more I got weirded out and confused. Like, the idea I couldn't be lazy and unmotivated as mafia is...puzzling. This read on me doesn't make a lot of sense. (*´ω`*)In post 378, Prism wrote:
It depends a bit on who your partners would be but my instinct is that continuing to play things in the backseat/letting people develop without too many nudges from you will lead to a loss, the only one that's probably best to steer clear of would be my push on Hectic. If me/Chara are both town, letting us continue to be the strongest voices would be a disaster waiting to happen. I think a good counterpoint, briefly stated, would be that I don't actually have scum meta on you. It's very strange to know you extremely well in some ways and have complete gaps in others.In post 374, catboi wrote:
Er, what's the approach I "should" take?In post 371, Prism wrote:catboi's reads and general approach haven't really been angling for anything here, and he's really taking his time and letting things play out.
I hate that he's likely to be town, just not really the approach he should take for this game as scum imo. Only thing I didn't like was the early Hectic "deliberate" accusation, and that's really plausible for towncat too
190 shows him making some kind of reads. the logic on prism is fairly iffy, though. 302 is a read of some kind. 311 pressuring pooky is reasonable? like I had been thinking similarly, he just said it before me. 316 as the explanation for the vote-flip makes sense? little moment of indecisiveness that is maybe townie. Yeah, I kind of crapped out that read, it's not as strong as I thought but it at least shows an attempt?In post 382, redtea wrote:catboi, I'm not seeing these "attempts to legitimately evaluate people" anywhere before you made this post. Could you point me to some examples?
Now that I can give the game my attention, gonna stay up trying to eval until I end up falling asleep, let's see how it goes~- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
too sloppy to remember to include post links, edit by way of postIn post 399, catboi wrote:190 shows him making some kind of reads. the logic on prism is fairly iffy, though. 302 is a read of some kind. 311 pressuring pooky is reasonable? like I had been thinking similarly, he just said it before me. 316 as the explanation for the vote-flip makes sense? little moment of indecisiveness that is maybe townie. Yeah, I kind of crapped out that read, it's not as strong as I thought but it at least shows an attempt?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
(^-x-^*) so, reviewing the thread, starting from the shortest ISO because I am lazy:
Lavender:
already said I think there's a chance she could just be scum who doesn't know how to fake it. I actually really dislike the tone of 373. However, I feel as though she'd be a waste of a vote today. evaluate on day 2.
Tayl0r Swift:
the sequence from 71 and 79 to 172 bothers me, actually, now that I look at it - the turn from casual mechanics talk and "hey guys spare me" to complaining when things turned to serious strategy talk feels a little like someone who was trying to skate by but got turned off once they realized things weren't going to be so easy. Tone in later posts is oppositional which is maybe slightly town but that early sequence is kind of offputting
Morning Tweet:
More surprisingly mech-heavy start that I'd remembered. 179 suggests "surely at least one scum bothers [talking mechanics]" but I'm not sure she goes anywhere with this idea. 181 is an awkward response to taylor. Not sure I like the vote on elements in 230. Reads are just kind of tilted toward the more serious-ish players which is maybe a little surfacey? but I guess I could understand the inclination. Hard to get a handle here.
Tanner:
226 is a pretty good post. His annoyance at inactivity is townish. I'd say I lean town on him but want to see more.
Elements:
Did you know Elements has 33 posts in this game? I was surprised. hard to glean much of anything from them. I actually kind of like 97? It's a strategy post so I should maybe fade it a little because it could be made by someone of either alignment, but it looks like an honest evaluation where he looks at fighting and doesn't see the upside given the similarity of outcomes (it's incorrect, though - if you fight chara the game becomes 7v2 white flag which is incredibly good chances for town.)
Probably going to fall asleep soon but my gut-level take is that I was having a hard time getting a sense for redtea from his early posts, but his more recent posts look very town and are very much reminding me of our recent town game together so that is a very good sign (also in that game he was suspected early for being awkward/fillery before becoming more town, so hey, consistency)- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
f a i rIn post 406, Prism wrote:A better way to state my stance is this: I'm fine townleaning catboi because I think the way he's playing is a losing game if he's scum, and totally fine if he's town.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Kinda don't want to fully catch up or look at MT's reads until I'm finished on my own to not taint my own assessment.
redtea:
I like the point he makes in 183 about mafia leaving mech discussions open-ended. Does it actually say anything about his alignment? Maybe not. Misunderstands Hectic in 266 but I think the way he's trying to correct a point he thinks Hectic made doesn't feel malicious. Idk if that makes any sense. I do like that he questioned me on Hectic in 382 rather than just letting that sit. 384 just reminds me a ton of our last game, where he was arguing a counter to LHF pushes, and is just laying out an analysis here the feels very sound? I'm not even sure that I suspect hectic, I just like the way redtea is making his points here. Also 398 made me laugh.
puppy:
39 actually kind of pinged me hard when he made it? Just this big pile of setup questions out in the open to start things off, that triggered my gut along with the early snap townread of Tanner in 48 for a post I didn't feel was particularly telling. Tone of 62 actually kind of funny/good, though? Light assessment. I don't really like 139 though. The comment of "good vibes" from pooky just is way weird and I don't care for him asserting he's town this way. Main suspicion just sheeping onto Chara's Elements vote in 155/161 besides that doesn't have much else. Response to Hectic's questioning in 213 reads a tad overdefensive? Really very buddy-buddy in 234. I definitely do not townread CLAP. In fact the ISO mostly recharged my early gut-level suspicion.
pooky:
Fuck if I know. 387 bothers me a little because, like, if hectic is good as scum how does following the spare route actually help? His whole game here of just trying to push toward the spare route while offering nothing else is certainly suspect.
Prism and Chara are probably going to be harder to read. Should try to reassess hectic as well although he hasn't said much new since I last read him Have kind of, thoughts on how I want to proceed but want to try to get a big-picture view of the game in which is something I haven't done in a loooong time- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Prism:
Hectic callout in 221 makes sense, not sure the townread of Prism made a lot of sense, although the vote on him in 284 is...weird? Like he says he's not feeling up to playing and that earns a scumread? Aggression in 289 feels a little unnatural but eh. Evaluation of Chara in 296 is not something I'm sure I understand, but feels like real thoughts. Maybe. 320 over the read makes sense, and I really like 327, just the contrasting of a post from a past game with this one.
re: 341 "Is [Hectic] playing it so safe because he's uncomfortable as scum and struggling to start the game off on the right foot?" doesn't seem to fit with Hectic as scum? At least from the word of other people in this game. But the bit about expecting better reads is fair.
Read on me in 371 still kinda weird to me, the "I hate that he's likely to be town" is an odd thing to say.
Overall summary is that while I can see where Prism's aggro-tunnel on Hectic is coming from, and it looks townish? I think it's well within his range as scum? He's had a fairly narrow focus this game as well which makes me concerned. I want him to be town though. Hopefully he'll give me reason to put him there soon.
Chara:
long ISO where I find a lot less to read off than I'd hoped? I'm severely bad at trusting people this game. The point on elements in 160is, at least, a good sort of observation even if I don't think I liked the way puppy latched onto it. 297 is kind of skeevy in tone? I agree with elements on that one. After that, I..don't know? It find myself a bit muddled as to where their thoughts lie and didn't find any posts that screamed out to me as a good take or being really townie? I swear to god I'm not just being lazy, I'm just kind of ??? on Chara
Now to actually catchup on everything since mylastcatchup- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Sure, hit me.In post 443, CantHateAPuppy wrote:
but i did read this! it's always fun to read gossip about yourself. fyi my elements vote is semi-serious now, it's more than sheeping chara (actually i think she made the point first and technically i voted first?) anyways, i think i have a decent reason for voting elements if you want to hear it (you want to hear it don't you squidward)In post 430, catboi wrote:puppy:
39 actually kind of pinged me hard when he made it? Just this big pile of setup questions out in the open to start things off, that triggered my gut along with the early snap townread of Tanner in 48 for a post I didn't feel was particularly telling. Tone of 62 actually kind of funny/good, though? Light assessment. I don't really like 139 though. The comment of "good vibes" from pooky just is way weird and I don't care for him asserting he's town this way. Main suspicion just sheeping onto Chara's Elements vote in 155/161 besides that doesn't have much else. Response to Hectic's questioning in 213 reads a tad overdefensive? Really very buddy-buddy in 234. I definitely do not townread CLAP. In fact the ISO mostly recharged my early gut-level suspicion.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Reading MT's notes and already Lol I'm like way on the opposite end of the fence regarding puppy. But yet...I like what she has going on here? the lack of composition reminds me of how I jot things down without regards to a composed narrative and I think it's got good analysis in there. I would maybe not be as super trusting of some of her townreads as she is, but I like what I see from her and in a game where I'm starved for townreads, I think she's a good one to trust.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
have a theory that she might open up some if she's town or at least give us more to work with if not.In post 419, Tanner wrote:
why would she be a waste of a vote on day one? do you think it's gonna get *easier* to evaluate a nothing slot on day two?In post 407, catboi wrote:Lavender:
already said I think there's a chance she could just be scum who doesn't know how to fake it. I actually really dislike the tone of 373. However, I feel as though she'd be a waste of a vote today. evaluate on day 2.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I have heard of the fabled scum notedump from you, but I noticed in the example I could find those notes were heavy on the play-by-play but here your notes trend mostly toward analysis.In post 423, Morning Tweet wrote:Effort for me is NAI, bordering on slightly scummy. I have made a giant reads note post at least one time as scum in both my scum games this year, whereas I do it maybe 1/2 - 2/3rds the time as town. sometimes as town i just say fuck it and follow my heart without doing heavy backtrack reading
Why are you assuming he wouldn't get spared, though? This doesn't follow at all unless you'd have a large number of players you're more confident a town than hectic and I don't feel that impression here.In post 433, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
A) when we are scum-hunting - we must hunt down all the scum to win.In post 430, catboi wrote:pooky:
Fuck if I know. 387 bothers me a little because, like, if hectic is good as scum how does following the spare route actually help? His whole game here of just trying to push toward the spare route while offering nothing else is certainly suspect.
B) If we r going for 4 spare-win, we r trying to hit 4 townies with spares.
In one scenario (A) if hectic is scum and we fail to deal with him - we lose.
in scenario (B) if hectic is scum but we hit 4 town-spares -it won't matter that hectic is scum.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
In all seriousness, hadn't decided on who I actually wanted to vote.
The more I think about it, the more I think I'm with you on pooky.
HURT: PookyTheMagicalBear- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
The 4 spare ending is pretty bad if you miss once, yeah? What you're missing is that town then has to selectIn post 445, CantHateAPuppy wrote:also i was thinking about spares again. i forgot why we gave up on them. i know it's unlikely that we'll spare correctly 4 times in a row, but is the 4 spare ending really that bad? say there's one scum in finale, wouldn't that be pretty good odds with strong town players? or would paranoia + no flips be too much to overcome?anotherperson to be spared of the remaining 4, not pick the lone mafia among them, and then if they get that right, take a blind guess at the mafia among 4 people. 1 in 4 is really hard! by comparison on the fight route you can get a 1/2, 1/3 endgame at worst. But there's also another factor.
I guess the best way to explain this is, to win the spare route outright, you technically need to correctly townread 7 players (4 spares + the three mafia NKs). Technically, to win the fight route, you need to do the same - you have 5 eliminations, tops, so that leaves 7 people you can't eliminate. BUT with the fight route, you get the benefit of flips immediately that you can draw conclusions from, including chara if we end up missing on day 1. It also creates an endgame scenario where it's virtually impossible to deepwolf.
I've never been one to townblock, and I don't think I can win the game on day 1 by identifying 7 townies, but I'd like to try to assemble something, maybe get 5 people. If it's bad we'll probably learn right away from the chara flip.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
No, you're right, I didn't like her "ask me questions so I have something to talk about" and the more I read that post, the more I hate it. That first paragraph is such a non-statement, and the comment on taylor at the end is really bad, that looks like a really manufactured fos, like, dislikes mechanics talk = must not be townie? it looks like a read from someone who doesn't know how to fake it, yeah.In post 454, Tanner wrote:re: lavender's 431:
am i the only one who sees just how many things are wrong with this post?
~ while i know i didn't make it explicit, i think i've made it pretty clear so far that i'm begging certain people to talk about dayplay-related things, and the fact that lavender answers my question going "oh most of the pages so far are mech" is just?? not to mention that that's blatantly false, since there had been plenty of non-mech discussion so far?
~ the next line is again, a non-stance on pooky, and calling the 4 spare route fun?? (while in the last paragraph they wrote how they think they have a better understand of the game because of the mech talk?)
~ when asked who'd they fight if they had to, they chose taylor, because mech-talk is apparently not nothing in their opinion, but in the next line they hurt the backup-mod?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
No, I just had a little observation of her games and had a really crackpot theory of "she's probably not chara so leave her be for now", not that exclusively chara hunting is a smart thing to do, just that I don't need to worry about her poofing the game with no content. I also felt like if she is town, mis-eliminating her would get us basically nothing. That post you just mentioned was scummy enough that I'm no longer concerned with that and would happily vote her today, as much as it would pain me to do so ( ◞᷄દ◟᷅ )In post 460, Tanner wrote:is this theory based on experience...?
IYO, does this look like coalition pooky? Because it feels like a similar approach.oh hey look a serious wagon for once?
HURT: pooky- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
(●´ω`●)ゞ Have to ask: what doIn post 380, Chara wrote:Prism, if you care for it, Your Nightmare just concluded. Hectic won this as scum. i caught him day 1 but wasn't confident enough to get him eliminated and then got killed.
it'll certainly effect my own approach this game, and as it's fairly short i thought i'd mention it to you.youthink of him this game?
Just, the overall chummy hey guys let's have fun and pick the town attitude, the lack of realIn post 472, Tanner wrote:
i don't know, actually? wasn't he like... giving reads and trying to be townread in coalition? how does it feel like a similar approach?In post 468, catboi wrote:IYO, does this look like coalition pooky? Because it feels like a similar approach.
and to make it clear, i'm not saying "he's not trying to be townread" = "town"seriouscommentary or attempting to sort people. Honestly his whole last couple page of posting makes my skin crawl.
You know the funny thing though? We fight mafia on day 1, our odds also drastically go up, to the point it's not even worth comparing. I want to get this thing in the bag as early as possible.In post 505, Morning Tweet wrote:i think what I was thinking of was how Pooky points out our odds go up immensely if days 1 and 2 are slamdunk townread winners guaranteed. I guess i can find it somewhat more believable that he believes in his plan, if that makes sense.
I was also going to say I liked his "I always do this every game with mechanics, I always try to break the setup" but on other pass ehh maybe not as much i dont think its AI
(.=^・ェ・^=) You feel like an easier read than Prism. I have one recent forum game with you, you feel similar this game and you haven't rolled scum in a long time. Prism I do not have recent forum game experience with, only a handful of chat games, and I think he's capable of strong scum play. The bar for him to clear for being a strong townread is higher than it is for you. He's not quite there yet.In post 524, redtea wrote:okay catboi how did I get in here and not Prism. That isn't a thing that happens.
For real though, did you like, forget them?
I'll go ahead and make it clear here that my reads of that list is [town, neutral, town-lean]. Not trying to kick Tanner out or anything; for all Intents and Purposes I may as well consider him an ally, as I wouldn't fight him today and he doesn't seem to have the formidable-scary-maf reputation Chara does.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
This is pending an answer from Chara with regard to the question I asked about Hectic, sorry. I understand your misgivings, though.In post 552, Prism wrote:also want to hear more from cat about Hectic who I still scumread- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
He had an issue with you agreeing that fighting today was correct but then humoring hectic about who he would spare, I believe. I don't terribly want to answer for him but if that's what he was saying I see why he said it. Definitely disengaged but I suspect he's a strange player in terms of playstyle?In post 534, CantHateAPuppy wrote:Okay!
It started with Chara's observation in 160 that elements is talking about sparing, but isn't really looking for spares. Like, he still isn't, btw, he's just sort of moved on since everyone is over sparing. But where's the passion, does he look like he's trying to town hunt at all?
Ok that was old stuff but then there's my argument (?) With him around 196. He sort of decides that my asking about spares is scummy. Uh...? He doesn't posit why this is scummy, he just asserts that I'm "changing my tune" and after a respectable distance he parks his vote on me (and hasn't done anything with it?)
Maybe this is weak but it's only D1 and I'm fine with this read and would wagon him for it
I am amused and delighted that your scumreads are primarily the people who suspect you.In post 535, Elements wrote:Hectic - Town
Elements - Town
Chara - null
Prism - town
PookyTheMagicalBear - chara
catboi - town
Morning Tweet - town
Tayl0r Swift - eh
Lavender - who?
redtea - eh
Tanner - scum
CantLynchAPuppy - scum- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I respect the process.In post 555, Prism wrote:I just saw your review of me, I was already thinking I'd vote Hectic in 221, but I didn't want to put Hectic on guard before he answered my question. A couple of answers that I really didn't like later and it was time to ramp up the pressure/step on his neck if he's scum, no longer any reason to hold off.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
꒰*⑅˃̶͈ ৺˂̶͈⑅꒱੭ु⁾⁾·° This team loses the game literally 100% of the time based on the way I have played today alone, LmaoIn post 521, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
alright if you want my super spicy guess on who the scum-team is.In post 518, Morning Tweet wrote:I bet Chara and Tanner and prolly several ppl have made that point every 5 seconds but here I am rehashing it in the vain hopes it makes it clear to Pooky that we're taking the game on the path to murder and destruction and he needs to hop on board for now whether he agrees with it or not
I'd have to say:
Spoiler: Don't Click This!
Ah, the 400 post later callout. cunning genius elements suggests he get spared 2nd as chara, brilliantIn post 543, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
btw this post is why i think elements is chara.In post 118, Elements wrote:one of them should be pooky
one of them should be me
one of them should be hectic
he very conveniently puts himself in the middle of the order - he can't be last because he'd die on D3 - so it's a sneaky middle of the pack insert - he doesn't put himself first because he's a very sneaky chara.
I see pooky has changed his tune and started spouting BS when he finally faced real pressure, who could have seen that coming? (me)- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I guess that's fair. I had kinda taken it more as humoring him in an even-handed way rather than asking him in an attempt to evaluate him but I guess I was wrong! Does it make elements scummy? Idk if he's trying to be cheap or just thinking on a level beyond us.In post 573, CantHateAPuppy wrote:no, it's a fair question because hectic was talking about sparing but hadn't suggested anyone he'd wanted to spare. it's the same idea chara used to scumread elements that i sheeped onto. (no offense but did you actually read my posts lol)
What I do know is the exchange between you two still make me laugh out loud.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Sure but you won't~ ω(=^・^=)ωIn post 577, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
just lolIn post 571, catboi wrote:I see pooky has changed his tune and started spouting BS when he finally faced real pressure, who could have seen that coming? (me)
i flip town, you flip tomm ok?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Lol, probably. Although I don't know that I'd go to the extent of arguing that I would.In post 552, Prism wrote:I also didn't want to nip the townreads on us for mech in the bud too early, I really wanted the content/reactions-and I think redtea's validates this-but now I'm fine saying I think we both out the strat here as scum as long as one of us is town
I recall talking with a friend over your alignment in a game we were spectating. He was extremely confident you were town while you were basically a coinflip to me. I will accept that it is possible your style is just one that is difficult for me to read.In post 582, CantHateAPuppy wrote:lol
my style is to ask questions and try to do it in a neutral way, because i like seeing how people respond when you don't cue them exactly how you want them to respond. like, if you warn someone "im probing you" before you probe them you get a different response than if you don't. fyi. i think some people misread me when i do this
also i wanted hectic to elaborate more than he did. i still feel like he shoudl feel townier than he does, so i'm kind of null on the slot. (maybe it's just the posting gimmick? i admit the pictures do get me to at least read what he says)
As for Hectic, I feel comfortable enough now to say he has said things I like, as well as some I do not like. I do not have a definite conclusion on him, but I would say my misgivings are relatively minor right now.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
And how did you attempt to generate social interactions prior to the point I started attacking you?In post 621, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like it's trivial to calculate the pure-probability odds of each path. but we're not playing a game to roll dice - this is a social interaction game.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I had asked you about this. More specifically, it was in reference to the recently completed game you had with him where he was scum and you had read him correctly. You provided a link to the game as a reference but made no comparison between how his play felt in that game vs how his play feels in this one. It struck me as strange not to make a comment that was actually bothering to sort him.In post 586, Chara wrote:Not Chara's venge means we do need to eliminate another scum before then, though.
someone asked what my read on Hectic was the last time i checked the thread: it's a hesitant TR. but i believe i can read him better than that.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Largely that there was just no interest from you at all in seriously attempting to sort anyone. It's not the chosen route in the setup but how you approached posting about it. Too tired to do more.In post 624, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 622, catboi wrote:
And how did you attempt to generate social interactions prior to the point I started attacking you?In post 621, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like it's trivial to calculate the pure-probability odds of each path. but we're not playing a game to roll dice - this is a social interaction game.
Can you please state your case against me ?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Mainly the way that moment I start placing you under actual pressure for the first time in the game, you push back, call me scum, attempt to discredit me, attack elements for listing you as chara in 543544 while engaging in absurd reasoning that he must be chara because he listed himself second, something apparently only worth pointing out 400 posts later. Additionally, you claim right there that "If you take the time to think about how a chara would actually be behaving on D1 if the town is heavy against 4-spare, you'd either see less posting, distancing or some kind of weird in between - it would be nearly suicidal stupid to openly buddy a scum goon to the chara." But then, your "super spicy guess" as to who the scumteam is in 521 was me/taylor/elements, two players I have defended to an extent from other players who suspected them. There's no consistency of thought process here and if you were town I'd expect you to be applying the same reasoning to your own reads.In post 584, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 571, catboi wrote:I see pooky has changed his tune and started spouting BS when he finally faced real pressure, who could have seen that coming? (me)
Could you expand on this post?
What exactly did I post that you consider to be "BS"?
And then, in this post here you talk about drawing out from people who they want to spare, but it's not like you talked about it in any meaningful way of trying to get those reads from people - you engaged in the whole buddy-buddy good times love in our hearts posting style I've already talked about, avoided trying to rustle anyone, and proposed a silly speech-giving game rather than acting in a way that would get anyone to do anything meaningfully alignment indicative.In post 547, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
you know it probably would've been way easier to get AI-reads on the scum team if we had at least pretended to be down with the 4-spare strategy for a few days to give the incentive for scum to try to get a chara-spare win rather than just being like hell no there's no way we r giving chara a chance to win early.In post 546, Tanner wrote:i mean, define productive. imo getting people onto the highest EV path is productive. getting everyone to start talking reads is productive, because i will have a very hard time caring about this game if there's 3 people ~doing nothing~. am i succeeding in what i'm doing? debateable.
For the record, I had considered drawing things out at the start of the game in this fashion, but the moment the discussion turned to strategy of what to do, I had to move to immediately kill it under the weight of my excel spreadsheet and stop the discussion. Prolonged strategic discussions are an incredibly pro-scum environment, because they can contribute and share their honest opinion without doing anything revealing of their alignment. Everything everyone says is essentially null. There is no scumhunting that goes on in a lengthy discussion about strategy, but people can argue for pages and pages while killing any ability to get reads. It went longer in this game than I'd like, even, but I think ultimately I was successful in moving the game past discussions of how to play the setup, to discussions of how the game as constituted by the current playerlist. I think that's undeniably protown.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I will admit that every time he outs a reason for townreading someone this game, it makes my skin absolutely crawl. That, without a doubt, is the thing that bothers me the most from him. However, I am not sure he would play in a way that draws attention to himself so strongly by knowingly going against the grain now? He has also done a tell I consider to be slightly town indicative. It's not something I want to get into too deep, though. ( ^..^)ノIn post 679, Prism wrote:That's great. He also knows you're town 100% of the time as mafia.
I have seen literally zero redeeming play of his in my eyes. This is in stark contrast to the last two games I played with him, where in the first he was a universal townread who played very crisply, and the second was a universal TR who I took specific steps to mislead as scum, and I decided to shoot him since the chance of him getting voted was zero.
Reads are bad. Pushes are bad. Tone is bad. Progression is bad. Like ???- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
My error, that's what I get for reading backwards, I got my timeline confused - Regardless, that is less important than the part where you critique elements's team guess while failing to apply that reasoning to your own reads.In post 684, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
I put elements as chara b4 he put me as chara so your chain of causality is wrong on the observable facts alone.In post 682, catboi wrote:, attack elements for listing you as chara in 543544 while engaging in absurd reasoning that he must be chara because he listed himself second, something apparently only worth pointing out 400 posts later.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
How is it that he was "avoiding" you when he placed a hurt vote on you and directly questioned you on if you had any reads? (;¬_¬)In post 593, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I dunno
he hasn't done enough yet for me to use my soul read yet.
I'm worried he might be avoiding me :>- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
If I put a vote on someone I am saying "This person is suspicious" and drawing attention to them. If I was a bit vague with my initial posts, I don't think it was hard to infer why I felt you were suspect. My vote also got you to stop fucking around and produce actual content, so in that regard I'd consider it a rousing success.In post 696, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
ok you posted a spreadsheet and said we should do this fight thing.In post 682, catboi wrote:I think that's undeniably protown.
But have you really put much actual effort into sorting my alignment this game? Your vote is on me but what have you done to determine my alignment and how have you done it?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Me saying "the more I think about it, the more I think I'm with you" comes off pretty serious, I thought. But, whatever. I definitely did not communicate clearly at that point in time. If I step outside of my own head for a minute, I think I can see why someone would be bothered by the way I worded that vote post.In post 700, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
because it felt like a not very serious hurt vote. There was not much substance or additional follow-through.In post 698, catboi wrote:
How is it that he was "avoiding" you when he placed a hurt vote on you and directly questioned you on if you had any reads? (;¬_¬)In post 593, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I dunno
he hasn't done enough yet for me to use my soul read yet.
I'm worried he might be avoiding me :>
Let's make a deal: I still do not trust you. However, I do not think the town is going to want to FIGHT either of us today. I've other reads I'm more interested on elaborating on at this point in time. In order to avoid drowning the thread in an endless back and forth that no one actually wants to read, I am proposing a truce where we stop arguing with each other for now. Deal?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
This is definitely looking plausible at this point in time. I would be perfectly willing to fight Lavender at this point in time. I would say she is the player in this game I suspect the second most. (the first I will be explaining shortly).In post 597, Tanner wrote:my Spicy Hot Take(tm) of the night is that lavender (confidering how difficult they seem to be to wagon) is chara who's trying to leave out the fewest associates possible for after they flip. this may or may not be the sleep deprevation mixed with unhealthy tunnelling speaking. i'll decide in the morning.
HURT: lavender- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I actually suspected you, yes. I felt as though you were deliberately avoiding engagement with the thread, and hectic called you out on not having a single read. I felt like the gimmickry was a front, that if you played the part of the goofy fun man people would just wind up drawn to other targets and ignoring you because "why would he do that as scum?". You showed no sign of seriously sorting anyone's alignment, and at that point in time, that was good enough for my day 1 vote.In post 707, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
yes, and I thought it was pretty strange you took his vote that seriously - I'd love to know why you thought it was a good idea - I'm trying to see your thought process because I want to figure out if you are coming at me because you actually suspect me or if you are scum trying to push a ML.In post 704, catboi wrote:Me saying "the more I think about it, the more I think I'm with you" comes off pretty serious, I thought. But, whatever. I definitely did not communicate clearly at that point in time. If I step outside of my own head for a minute, I think I can see why someone would be bothered by the way I worded that vote post.
That's why I am asking you for "why" you believed that post made a good case for Pooky being scum.
(the past few days I have been unable to respond properly because I've been busy IRL and haven't been able to properly catch up to the thread which is why I've not really been able to respond to you directly). - catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi