chirp
tweet
warble?
chirp tweet
VOTE: ydrasseIn post 34, Ydrasse wrote:ROAR... ROAR, grumble.
pipe!In post 82, Ydrasse wrote:purrrrrr
pipe!In post 81, Loki Dokie wrote:Purrrrrrrrrrr
pipe.In post 38, Kanna wrote:squeak?
pipe?In post 72, Isis wrote:purrrrrrrrrr
warble?In post 91, Not_Mafia wrote:Moo
warble?In post 63, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
sing?In post 70, PlusJOYED wrote:gurgle gurgle spert fshhhh bub hub bub
88 89 tweet tweet. sing! sing! sing!In post 88, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 87, Hectic wrote:[5] Not Voting: Not_Mafia, Lokie Dokie, drusilla, Kanna
sniff?In post 162, Kanna wrote:scree click click,
scree VOTE: isis VOTE: pooky
squeak
s-queak: squeakity...
In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animal
In post 197, Hectic wrote:PlusJOYED, Tayl0r Swift, Not_Mafia
In post 218, drusilla wrote:sniff?In post 162, Kanna wrote:scree click click,
scree VOTE: isis VOTE: pooky
squeak
s-queak: squeakity...
In post 211, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click click
sniff?In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animal
hee-haw?
sniff?
In post 248, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click click!
In post 227, drusilla wrote:In post 211, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click clicksniff?In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animal
sniff?
eee-aaah hee-haw. hee-haw eee-aaah.
eee-ahhhhhhhhh!!
eee-aaah?
In post 218, drusilla wrote:In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animalIn post 197, Hectic wrote:PlusJOYED, Tayl0r Swift, Not_Mafia
In post 194, Hectic wrote:
In post 197, Hectic wrote:Ydrasse, PlusJOYED,
In post 206, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 207, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 211, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 227, drusilla wrote:In post 211, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click clicksniff?In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animal
In post 232, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 236, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 248, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 250, drusilla wrote:In post 248, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click click!In post 227, drusilla wrote:In post 211, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click clicksniff?In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animalsniff?
In post 254, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 256, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 269, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
In post 269, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
VOTE: pookythemagicalbear VOTE: plusjoyedIn post 269, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
sniff?
sniff? sniff?
sniifffffffffffffffffff.
In post 285, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 197, Hectic wrote:ANNOUNCEMENT:
Condemn one more animal, and it can't be PookyTheMagicalBear again. Good luck.
Click !!
Click Click Click!!!In post 197, Hectic wrote:it can't be PookyTheMagicalBear again. Good luck.
In post 197, Hectic wrote:againIn post 197, Hectic wrote:againIn post 197, Hectic wrote:again
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK!!!
In post 257, drusilla wrote:In post 218, drusilla wrote:In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animalIn post 197, Hectic wrote:PlusJOYED, Tayl0r Swift, Not_MafiaIn post 197, Hectic wrote:Ydrasse, PlusJOYED,
In post 196, Hectic wrote:Not_Mafia HAMMER
[1] PlusJOYED: Ydrasse
[1] Tayl0r Swift: PlusJOYED
[1] Isis: Tayl0r Swift
In post 196, Hectic wrote:PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 196, Hectic wrote:the mafia
In post 282, drusilla wrote:In post 206, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 207, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 211, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 227, drusilla wrote:In post 211, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click clicksniff?In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animalIn post 232, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 236, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 248, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 250, drusilla wrote:In post 248, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click click!In post 227, drusilla wrote:In post 211, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click clicksniff?In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animalsniff?In post 254, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 256, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 269, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!In post 269, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!VOTE: pookythemagicalbear VOTE: plusjoyedIn post 269, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK !!
In post 197, Hectic wrote:With 9 alive, it takes 5 to condemn someone. If there is no majority by the deadline, the mafia will choose who to condemn.
The condemning deadline is in (expired on 2020-09-16 07:18:42).
i can walk you through whatever it is you didn't get, if you'd like.In post 357, Isis wrote:which I didn't really get.
this is why i was trying to express to you that i thought kanna was town, after she cleared up what she meant by the recruiting.In post 359, Isis wrote:i doubt anyone figured that out
i agreed that isis and pooky would be high picks across the board, yes. i disagreed that i chose isis, obviously.In post 366, Kanna wrote:i *think* i understood some of drusilla's posts but i found them quite scummy
@drusilla; if you understood me, then did you agree with me?
drusilla is a shiki alt, which kanna (and possibly others) is aware of.In post 372, Isis wrote:is drusilla an alt
i won't 'what' you. i guess could you just talk to me about why you thought my play was scummy? please.In post 378, Kanna wrote:stop "what"ing me guys, y'all making me sad
if they're both mafia but the game is set up where we condemn two but only eliminate one they could both be mafia and the game would continue, i believe.In post 383, PlusJOYED wrote:so mechanically, it would make no sense to play this out if one of those 2 wasn't scum, so one of them is probably scum and the other town.
i checked on players familiarity with eachother but i'm not sure how helpful it is. i don't think there is anyone in the game who would choose me, and i would have chosen loki dokie, which i thought about at length after it was revealed that the mafia chose their partner.In post 382, Kanna wrote:i'm not well known at all and i think only you/shiki would consider picking me
i would say this is quite unlikely to be the climax. looking at last silent star might give some indication that this is not THE END.In post 390, PlusJOYED wrote:this is likely the climax
i was trying to show that they were familiar with eachother and their votes were odd. i wasn't hard casing them i was trying to get opinions from other people i townread at the time, which isis was one of. isis went with plusjoyed, who was one of the four options i was comfortable voting, so i also voted there. plusjoyed posted not super infrequently but almost none of them are attempting to communicate something game related, as far as i could tell. taylor swift and not mafia are null to me. plusjoyed slight mafia leaning and ydrasse's votes were weird and after i townread them for attempting to establish basic communication they kinda faded from the game in a way, which coincided with the votes on pooky, so this was also strange to me.In post 394, Kanna wrote:272 is like reachy analysis i think is scum indicative for drusilla
271 was a bit confbiasy for my isis/drusilla theory, but i was very confused by the plusjoy votes especially if drusilla understood/agreed(?) with me earlier about pooky/isis
273 is me asking drusilla if she understood me etc etc, where did the plusjoy thing come from??
plusjoyed made sense in various worlds to me and their play individually seemed the scummiest out of the non-you players to me, and isis who i was townreading voted there. would you have chosen plusjoyed? somewhat unlikely. would plusjoyed have chosen you? quite possibly.In post 406, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:can you please explain why you wanted to put PlusJOYED as the 2nd condemnation?
it is very easy to look at other players games i have done so for everyone in this game and i've never played with many of you. do you think a mafia who had to choose their partner would not do so? i don't understand this.In post 417, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Why would PlusJoyed choose me? He's literally never played with me before. and then we open up as the first 2 posters? I mean cmon really?
i mean by this logic you're saying isis and i are mafia together and just were the first two votes on two wagons we pushed? is that something you think mafia frequently do? i don't think being the first two posters makes much a difference, especially since both of you then declined to actually participate in the game for some time.In post 417, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I mean cmon really?
i guess this was lost in animal communication. because it sure felt like that is what you were pushing.In post 427, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:no I didn't say you and isis were mafia together.
for me what would suggest you're a good choice for me would be the drawing of attention, but i'm not sure i could evaluate why other players would make that decision. i disagree with the last sentence entirely but it feels particularly not useful to discuss.In post 429, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ok and what in my play-history would suggest I am good as a scum-partner ? I'm usually outspoken, brash and draw tons of attention - in a post restricted game such as this one I would think the ideal partner would be someone who is more of a silent hide in the shadows type player.
eh. i really dislike this kind of thing because i've seen a lot of players as mafia use it to manipulate. it's null at best i think.In post 433, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ill townbin this
especially since it is something that can easily be checked instead of voiced.In post 437, drusilla wrote:eh. i really dislike this kind of thing because i've seen a lot of players as mafia use it to manipulate. it's null at best i think.
it's scummy that you didn't try to communicate with other players beyond 'cute tiger gif' and then cared about the votes and what would happen if we didn't reach consensus. like that's pretty straightforward to me.In post 440, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I was really excited to be a tiger and there were a large number of really cute tiger gifs and apparently thats scummy
and then after the first condemnation the first thing i tried to do was ask your opinion on direction to go in, because you had already been condemned, so it's super useful information. and you didn't respond despite multiple attempts and just continued 'cute gif' 'random clicks' until we voted for plusjoyed, and then you cared about the game again.In post 442, drusilla wrote:it's scummy that you didn't try to communicate with other players beyond 'cute tiger gif' and then cared about the votes and what would happen if we didn't reach consensus. like that's pretty straightforward to me.
who to vote for? for instance. if you care about the lack of consensus votes helping to develop a consensus seems the correct course of action. do you not think anyone was trying to communicate about the game?In post 445, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ok can you explain why that is? What was there to communicate about that I didn't do?
like if you're town you'd help develop a consensus. i think mafia would be far more likely to say, hey look we need to do this. instead of doing it.In post 446, drusilla wrote:who to vote for? for instance. if you care about the lack of consensus votes helping to develop a consensus seems the correct course of action. do you not think anyone was trying to communicate about the game?
i was listening to you. in fact i asked you, twice, which direction you thought we should go in.In post 447, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:because I didn't know what to do. People literally just threw me in a cage and said hey this guy is probly scum, you really think first thing on my mind after that happens is "well time to get the town to listen to me now"?
i do not know what this means.In post 451, Isis wrote:drusilla turning out to be a shiki alt that is also a dr. dolittle is such a curveball pitch
what did you think these posts were trying to communicate?In post 452, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I didn't know you were listening to me, you literally just led my lynch-wagon I thought I was dead
In post 227, drusilla wrote:In post 211, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click clicksniff?In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animal
In post 250, drusilla wrote:In post 248, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click click!In post 227, drusilla wrote:In post 211, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:click click clicksniff?In post 197, Hectic wrote:Condemn one more animalsniff?
it is drusilla from buffy the vampire slayer. if my brain were 'on' the day i /inned i would have made a new account but i became afraid i would miss the signup, which i almost did anyway.In post 455, Isis wrote:is drusilla's avatar april ludgate?
ah! i understand now. lifetime of struggling to effectively communicate is likely the reasoning for this, which is what i meant by my post earlier.In post 460, Isis wrote:it is a surprise
Dr. dolittle is an animal linguist who can understand animals in a movie, the comparison is how you understand more of the animal sounds postings than most people I think.
In post 461, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I thought you were saying we got Pooky let's go get one more
oh. hm. i was trying to ask you because that is super useful information to have regardless of your alignment because you had already been condemned, and also seeing what course of action you would take as a player in that position seemed like something that could be evaluated.In post 462, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like I didn't even consider you would want my opinion on who to get next because you kind of drove me into a cage, threw me in and tried to lynch me(I had no idea that condemnation =/= lynch) when you did that to me.
there was a game i played in where there were back to back day phases so i thought it was most likely an adjusted version of that, to still include the eliminated player in more of the game, because of the post restriction and short deadline.In post 466, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Why would having 2 flips make sense? I thought it was obviously a nomination process after it was revealed that I wasn't dead.
In post 470, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ok I've never seen a game where an eliminated player doesn't flip and gets to keep voting, plus the throwing me in a cage instead of killing me made more sense as a nomination mechanic rather than a kill mechanic from the flavor.
i thought the cage was in order to do a ritual of some sort later on, and to explain why you got to continue voting for the time being.In post 470, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ok I've never seen a game where an eliminated player doesn't flip and gets to keep voting, plus the throwing me in a cage instead of killing me made more sense as a nomination mechanic rather than a kill mechanic from the flavor.