You're not waiting for shit, you're producing content. Let's go.In post 949, a2rudeboy wrote:I'm just gonna sit here and wait for chkflip to catch up through 38pgs of nonsense
VOTE: Titus
You're not waiting for shit, you're producing content. Let's go.In post 949, a2rudeboy wrote:I'm just gonna sit here and wait for chkflip to catch up through 38pgs of nonsense
VOTE: Titus
I'm not reading 40 pages but you're still a stupid motherfucker. = D!In post 951, Galron wrote:I predict more than one person, including myself, will be called something along the lines of a stupid mothertrucker.In post 949, a2rudeboy wrote:I'm just gonna sit here and wait for chkflip to catch up through 38pgs of nonsense
I'm hungry to know why the fuck you feel so comfortable fluffing nonsense.In post 954, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Now I'm hungry for chicken.
Why so defensive, bud?In post 1003, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Everyone else is doing it so why can't I?
What did my vote have to do with dave's tell?In post 1004, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Why'd you vote Titus without hearing what the tell was?
Thanks. I hyper-skimmed the two pages up to this, so I don't have a read on the slot. What pinged you about Leia? I recall reading the Leia slot briefly when I messaged Bake about replacing in there, but I couldn't tell you I remember a single thing about what I'd read.In post 1006, Doctor Drew wrote:Chk, first off welcome, but what is your opinion on Dave?
Personally he has seemed townie since replacing in, but I believed his original form(Leia) to be very scummy.
I feel like a fresh set of eyes on Leia could offer some new insight.
Elaborate.In post 1006, Doctor Drew wrote:Also, as superficially scummy that NPOM has been, I feel like we should stay away from that lynch.
What the fuck is this?In post 1007, Galron wrote:Going to need sorted.In post 981, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:No reason, just saying it is accurate.
I have reasons to not be too helpful.
VOTE: Walter
What indicated to you that she was new?In post 1013, Doctor Drew wrote:Leia's case on TD was complete shit, thought she was an alt of an established player, but think she just was noobScum.
I don't like this.In post 1078, Bambi Jay wrote:In post 1075, NoPowerOverMe wrote:What if you don't make it to day 2?
I have a feeling something will keep me alive for a few nights. A good hunch.
I feel like you know that's bullshit, but I'll give you an opportunity to elaborate and maybe reconsider as you do so.In post 1081, Galron wrote:I don't particularly want someone with no incentive to help around.
Alch never actually fucked anything up, so, that doesn't work for me. That's an excuse. You're literally fishing against his soft and I reeeeeeally don't like it.In post 1086, Galron wrote:Do you want another Alch situation gumming up the works? If he's not 3P I wanna hear it from him. So far he's done about nothing but lament about how little he's done.
Why?In post 1103, TiphaineDeath wrote:@CHK Galron is the best wagon that has happened today xD.
Sounds like you're the one that knows he'll flip town.In post 1174, Titus wrote:I am voting Walter because he's the largest wagon I actually like. Sure flip and iks could be theatre but I doubt it. It feels more like a towncred save.
Fascinating. Why aren't you voting dave with that mentality? Leia did nothing but troll.In post 1179, Doctor Drew wrote:I feel like chk doesn't think it is possible for scum to troll.
Stupid shit like this is why you always get eliminated, DD.In post 1195, Doctor Drew wrote:Why are you protecting Siteflake by missrepping me? Remember when I asked you to take a look at Leia? Did you forget that already?
"Oh what he said" is not admissible to me.In post 1197, Doctor Drew wrote:Addressed the TD thing...maybe you need new glasses.
In post 1197, Doctor Drew wrote:Again, the trolling thing is irrelevant to me.
Excuse me if I continue to press X to fucking DOUBT.In post 1179, Doctor Drew wrote: I feel like chk doesn't think it is possible for scum to troll.
She hasn't read me correctly probably ever, dude.In post 1217, davesaz wrote:I know you have enough experience to know it's a meta read. Acting dumb about it is not a good look.
There's a post in there where she talks about changing the settings to see posts in hours:minutes:seconds. That's not something a non-alt typically knows. She also spoke about a few people alluding to having meta.In post 1202, Doctor Drew wrote:unless you can tell me she isn't, I feel she was noobscum.
Memeing/trolling in and of itself isn't scummy. I've seen most of you do it. As town. It's an easy mis-shred. I'm stopping us from wasting a phase on an easy mis-elim. Explain how that's scummy. Also, cite somewhere where I give a fuck about my partners as scum so much to stick my Goddamn neck out for them when nobody had a read on me. That's stupid. Don't be stupid.In post 1202, Doctor Drew wrote:Tell me why Siteflake isn't scummy and explain why you aren't protecting them.
Idk how you could've missed it, but yeah I didn't read any of that. You can quote it, reiterate your case, or tell my why your vanity wagon is more important than majority.In post 1231, Iecerint wrote: 1. This has been explained in like half my iso.
2. My reads are mostly unchanged since page ~30. My #2 is probably Walter right now, based on his facile approach to the IKS wagon, and NPOM's attitude toward IKS. IKS meta could have a big effect on this.
...
Yes.In post 1253, Galron wrote:Do you need to be so abrasive?
Remember that time you got super upset with Nero Cain?In post 1267, Titus wrote:Also, flip might be scum but I am definitely not facing a rage bot right now.
This one's funny, but for srs. If Lavender can post a read's list then so can you.In post 1270, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:there is no way an account called "i keep siteflaking" is an altIn post 1258, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Is IKS an alt then.In post 1257, Iecerint wrote:IKS has no completed games. That was fast. <_<
DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DINGIn post 1275, Starbuck wrote:However, the quickness in how the wagons have been building is a concern.
What information do you gather from an IKS flip?In post 1283, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why is IKS not a good use of our time? When pressured they opted to start posting non-content rather than offer a defense, I think that’s more scum than town indicative.
What was the point of this?
Why are you concerned about how you look?In post 1409, a2rudeboy wrote:It doesn't necessarily look very good to spend my whole day railing against not voting NPOM, and then either hammer or put him at l-1.
That word. I don't think it means what you think it means.In post 1425, Looker wrote:Brava, enjoy your self-esteem
And where are your reads pulled from, exactly?In post 1436, Gamma Emerald wrote:Looks like Lavender is at least self aware that her reads are kinda pulled from the aether...?
In post 1458, Starbuck wrote:I'm not impressed by Lavender's reads list. There's no actual talk of the current game state or anything that's happened at all. She seems busy and from what I'm seeing, you all say that she did the same in the last game. I appreciate the effort, but I'm still just as null on her as I was before 1432. If all she's going to do is prodge, that's pretty unfair to those who are here and contributing. It's not a shreddable offense, more irritating than anything.
You're both fishing at the same pond so I'll go ahead and address you both. As I already stated, yes, the reads list needs improvement. Thank you for addressing where her weaknesses are so the addendum to the two-part list is that much better. Last game I played with her was her second-ish game (IIRC?) So I'm kind of old-school IC hatting to push for what we actually need from the slot. It's obvious she is inexperienced and simply doesn't know better. A quick skim through her game history will show you what I mean when I say this is an improvement. In no way am I saying it's enough. We'll get her there it just might not happen in this day phase.In post 1465, a2rudeboy wrote:Chk did. To produce a reads list. Which she gave us, and as already been discussed, wasn't really worth much of anything.
Also, I apparently was unaware that direct questions need to be asked for a person to produce content.
Your memory is fun, considering the fact that "the game" you mention here shows me literally hyperdunking on my partner who had no light on them whatsoever and rode that shit to victory.In post 1749, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I think chkflip if scum was not happy with his teammates yet in the end voted for npom even though he does not like policy lynches. I call bullshit. I don't see much solving from chk, just a lot of questioning which lines up with the game I have played with him where he was scum. Going further into meta territory although weaker, Titus is one of the people he mentioned that does know his scum game.
In post 1728, davesaz wrote:Looker Sat Sep 26, 2020 2:01:01 pm
NPOM Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:23:58 pm
me Sun Sep 27, 2020 12:24:58 pm (note: my previous day was VLA)
pisskop Sun Sep 27, 2020 10:56:44 am
In post 1730, davesaz wrote:Timestamp of IKS's claim Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:00:09 pm
This IIoA is so LAMIST it's fucking painful.In post 1734, davesaz wrote:Why would scum bus before a claim, especially when there was a seemingly valid counter to work with?
Possibly more importantly, what do you think about people who switched from NPOM vs. people who hadn't voted NPOM?
My thoughts: any new bussing (if any) is after claim, and probably not the first 1-2 after claim. Pre-claim bussing (if any) should be much earlier in the wagon before it got real, and people who had laid a foundation to not vote NPOM.
I wouldn't say "as scum" or "as town" I'm anything because everything that proceeds after sentences like those are complete WIFOM bullshit.In post 1868, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Would you say as scum Chk you are capable of emulating this attitude or is this more your town meta?
Couldn't have been that transparent if three reads were completely left out of it until prompted.In post 1865, pisskop wrote:look I just wanted some concrete reads from you, not to hsve to make a reads list at 3:30 from my bedside laptop when Ive been pretty transparent about it.
In post 1871, chkflip wrote:I will say that I'm always angry.
NoPowerOverMe (6): Iecerint, Lavender, Galron, DrippingGoofball, chkflip, Doctor DrewIn post 1881, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I knew my wagon was scum driven so there was no point in claiming. The more votes on me the more scum we catch.
In post 1901, davesaz wrote:The last sentence is analysis. Failed attempt at buzzword slinging noticed.
In an absolutely stunning effort, our glorious davesaz comes in (without explicitly stating) that 1-2 of NPOM, Walter, Gamma, and Starbuck are NOT SCUM.In post 1734, davesaz wrote:any new bussing (if any) is after claim, and probably not the first 1-2 after claim.
Pre-claim bussing (as in before the claim, when he was Shred-2, and therefore before the potentially cleared 1-2 out of 4 fucking people) should be much earlier in the wagon. This statement implies that the mid-wagon votes are also more likely town than not and that we're more likely to find scum in BrightEyedFish, TiphaineDeath, Bambi Jay, Titus, Looker, and pisskop. "But wait!" you fucking scream at me. "Titus is dead!" CORRECT. So we're to look at BEF, TD, Looker, and pisskop, right?In post 1734, davesaz wrote:Pre-claim bussing (if any) should be much earlier in the wagon before it got real, and people who had laid a foundation to not vote NPOM.
He does this in all of his games.In post 2072, davesaz wrote:Oh hey we agree on something. Plus, who puts "line" tags in their posts? Someone who cares more about post formats than having actual positions.