[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 12130755 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Musician Mafia: Guitarists GAME OVER - Mafiascum.net
Has mafia/ other PTs daytalk?
Can there be neutral party?
Can this be multiball (2 mafias)?
Can you lie in role PMs/ flips?
Is it possible, that a person has a modifier/ role (s)he wasn't told about nor hinted about? (saying you have a modifier you don't know about is OK, having a miller who recieves VT PM not)
In post 76, Princess Leia wrote:Okay, that's enough RVS. Let's do some good old fashioned scumhunting.
Firstly, you need to ensure you're able to see seconds in post timestamps. If you don't know how, go to User Control Panel > Board Preferences > My date format > Custom > D M d, Y g:i:s a (Paste that into the box, or just add a colon and a s after the i)
These two posts are only 4 seconds apart in timestamps. I find it unbelievable that the poster giving intent to hammer would be able to read, write out, and submit this post all in 4 seconds,
unless
they're some kind of 20-person hydra who each type out 1 letter. It's interesting that this post was not signed by anyone, as this is further evidence the account is a hydra, since we all know that hydras never sign posts.
If The Baker gives us confirmation it is not, we can proceed with my theory. My theory is as follows:
The players who made posts 8 and 9 coordinatated them together. It's an innocent enough sequence of posts; they're amusing and friendly, and give the players a strong entrance to RVS - essential for establishing a good foothold in the game. Where they've messed up here however is how close they've posted to each other; subsequently outing themselves as scummies to the world.
In post 227, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because it’s actually a warning that him playing protown probably means he is scum
So now he knows that you know. So playing protown shifted from being scum indicative of him to being WIFOM. You just threw away one of your tools for scumhunting. Why?
In post 326, Princess Leia wrote:That is really scummy. Not because you're self voting, but because you saw nopower self voting and thought "hey look, everyone thought that looked scummy and voted him for it. A scum would never do that after they saw how badly it went for him!"
Therefore, you self vote thinking we'll fall into that line of thinking, concluding you must be town for doing something which already garnered so much negative attention.
But what you didn't realise was that LEIA was on the case.
I believe, that there is at least one scum in {Looker, DrippingGoofball, pisskop, pookythemagicbear, WaltertheDance, Bambi Jay}
Slots from that set with 0 content: {Looker, Bambi Jay}
Since I have already played a game with town lurking Looker, I will VOTE: B. Jay
Iecerint
TiphaineDeath
A50
Titus
Doctor Drew
Pooky
a2rudeboy aka Hypnotoad
Galron
Pisskop
Gamma
BrightEyed
Starbuck
Princess Leia/REPLACEMENT
Lavender
Nono
Looker
DGB
IKS
Walter
Bambi
NPOM
SCUM
uhhhh
REASONS?
I'm happy to answer specific questions you have. You can see my thoughts from the posts I made as I caught up with the game.
You have less than 20 posts before that read list. There is zero possibility you sorted as many slots as did and covered them all in that limited span. YOU ARE A LIAR! VOTE: Iecerint
I think, that there is a better approach for this than to claim that there is 0 possibility that he sorted that many slots.
@they may have thrown
why are following players in your list on positions they are in?
Galron, Pisskop, Walter, DGB, NPOM, iecerint, starbucks.
Why not?
Took me like 5 mins to find that game, check who from this game pushed me for joking about modkill and was in the other game and didn't react on BS asking for modkill and was town.
And I have a neat FOS on piss now. I am happy.
In post 927, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:I think, that there is a better approach for this than to claim that there is 0 possibility that he sorted that many slots.
@they may have thrown
why are following players in your list on positions they are in?
Galron, Pisskop, Walter, DGB, NPOM, iecerint, starbucks.
1) I think his answer in 931 was odd in that he had extended commentary for each one of your selected players. What are your thoughts on that?
2) How did you choose the players to ask him about?
1) He claimed that he has reasons why he put players where he put them. Nothing surprising.
2)
galron - wagon
pisskiop - my scumread
Walter/ DGB - not general scumreads
NPOM - I don't find him that scummy as people do
iecerint - joke
starbucks - hasn't pinged me in any way and I wanted to hear opinions of others.
Sorry for being so distant, but work and this game called Among Us has taken up most of my time. Among Us is basically this but with graphics, so yeah. Also faster paced.
In post 1079, Doctor Drew wrote:Siteflake's reaction to the snap wagon on him seemed odd in that he seemed to not care and/or knew it would just pass over, I feel town would get more defensive rather than play it cool.
In post 1122, Almost50 wrote:Can someone please scum claim at this point? (Not you, Bambi. Everyone knows you'd claim anything anytime just for the giggles, so that'd be worthless)
In post 1140, Doctor Drew wrote:Siteflake's reaction to being wagoned was so non-chalant that it is like he new it would pass(and if he is scum, good idea to look and see who was pushing alternate wagons). Imo, town would get at least somewhat defensive or do something to get votes off of them. The way Siteflake acted was almost like he had people to coach him and assure him that this wagon wasn't going anywhere.
Can I ask for a deeper analysis of wagonomics from you, please?
In post 1122, Almost50 wrote:Can someone please scum claim at this point? (Not you, Bambi. Everyone knows you'd claim anything anytime just for the giggles, so that'd be worthless)
In post 1140, Doctor Drew wrote:And him calling out PK just reeked of 'let me find anything in his meta that can make him look bad'. How am I the only one that sees it that way?
The traditional tool for making dowels is a dowel plate, an iron (or better, hardened tool steel) plate with a hole having the size of the desired dowel. To make a dowel, a piece of wood is split or whittled to a size slightly bigger than desired and then driven through the hole in the dowel plate. The sharp edges of the hole shear off the excess wood.
A second approach to cutting dowels is to rotate a piece of oversized stock past a fixed knife, or alternatively, to rotate the knife around the stock. Machines based on this principle emerged in the 19th century. Frequently, these are small bench-mounted tools.
For modest manufacturing volumes, wood dowels are typically manufactured on industrial dowel machines based on the same principles as the rotary cutters described above. Such machines may employ interchangeable cutting heads of varying diameters, thus enabling the machines to be quickly changed to manufacture different dowel diameters. Typically, the mechanism is open-ended, with material guides at the machine's entry and exit to enable fabrication of continuous dowel rod of unlimited length. Since the 19th century, some of these dowel machines have had power feed mechanisms to move the stock past the cutting mechanism.
High-volume dowel manufacturing is done on a wood shaper, which simultaneously forms multiple dowels from a single piece of rectangular stock (i.e., wood). These machines employ two wide, rotating cutting heads, one above the stock and one below it. The heads have nearly identical cutting profiles so that each will form an array of adjoined, side-by-side "half dowels". The heads are aligned to each other and one head is shaped to make deeper cuts along the dowel edges so as to part the stock into individual dowel rods, resulting in a group of dowel rods emerging in parallel at the machine's output.