Open 798 | PYPX/Y+I/M | Game Over!
Forum rules
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
In post 17, JacksonVirgo wrote:Bah bah black sheep have you any wool
Yes sir yes sir three bags full
One for the master and one for the dame
One for the little boy who lives down the lane.X- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
you're lucky you voted correctly, otherwise i would be all over this.In post 20, skitter30 wrote:Also i'm intrigued that scum picked informed, i prob would have picked multitasking- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
looks to me like a sneaky opening line cooked up behind the scenes.In post 23, Uncrowned wrote:Go on?
the intention of course being to feign surprise & assert innocence.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
doubling down, i see.In post 29, skitter30 wrote:Nah, just making an observation that's meant to spark conversation (like it did!).
And I've been scum in x|y setups twice and multitasking is vastly more useful imo, you can get a p decent sense of the spread of roles just from knowing where scum sits in the draft + like two flips/claims
did you get outvoted in the scum PT?- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i say we slice & dice the singletons.In post 31, petapan wrote:no that is hooplas trick
seeing such a large amount of medium & high numbers looks like a deliberate scum strategy to land unique numbers. a high number selection usually guarantees a pick in the top half of the draft.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
mmm fair point.In post 37, skitter30 wrote:i mean, if i did, i kinda doubt i'd be airing scum dirty's laundry here, or that i'd choose to make a point of it
it would probably take a moment of brilliance to conceive of such a cunning plan.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i want to say peta's bid of a million is another brazen, highly suspicious scum move cooked up in the PT...In post 41, Uncrowned wrote:With this thought process in mind, how many scum do you think there is between myself (14) Infinity (23) and Petapan (100000)?
...but she's already pointed the finger at me, and we all know it's improper etiquette to accuse your accuser.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i once attempted a humorous post back in 2013.In post 77, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: hoopla
Hard to tell how serious her posts have been, but something feels off about them
needless to say, i have learned my lesson since then.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
here's the relevant post from Open 794 (updated with the 794's results):In post 97, Something_Smart wrote:Hoopla, do, uh, do you have any stats about how often numbers have been repeated four or more times?
of the 210 slots across 15 games, 45 are scum, 165 are town. here's where mafia have fallen:
as we can see, scum overwhelmingly tend to land in the singleton and doubled up numbers. this is a consequence of scum never choosing to collide with each other's numbers in the previous 15 runs of the game. they will naturally land higher in the draft (on average) by using such a strategy.
as for something_smart's specific question:
two games have had a quadruple.
two games have had a quintuple.
one game has had a sextuple.
so, one in three games has seen a group of 4+. interestingly, out of those 24 slots, only two have been scum.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
we have a lot of competing theories to explain the multitasking decision:In post 88, skitter30 wrote:Or they werent in the last game?
I think that the info gained from picking informed isnt that much - a reasonably savvy scumteam should be able to approximate that sort of info once they know of like two claims
1) scum weren't in the last game/scumteam is comprised of newer players who may not know the true value of multitasking
2) scum have doubled/tripled up, tanking their draft position and chances to win roles
3) scum have made a leftfield play and are now engineering their responses to appear town by saying insisting they wouldn't have done that/considered that
~~
my responses to those:
1) a lot of the playerlist was in or observed that last game where it was seen multitasking was a useful consequence. seems likely scum would have had at least one member who knew its value.
2) this is an easier theory for me to rebuke as i have knowledge of my own alignment as town (thus can rule out 25% of the 4's), but there are simply too few doubled players for this to be likely, combinatorially speaking. the average draft will usually only have 2 to 4 players with unique numbers. this game we have 8. it's far likelier scum haven't doubled up.
3) my prodding of skitter was somewhat facetious. it's a seductive conspiracy theory for scum to pick something seemingly suboptimal just so they can overtly insist they wouldn't do it... this definitely falls within the realms of conspiracy, imo.
i'm persuaded by skitter's illumination of her thought process. having said that, i think infinity's piggybacking of skitter's train of thought:
is much likelier to be a faked stance.In post 92, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm with skitter on this, I think multitasking is pretty much optimal no matter what.
~~
there's one more theory i'd throw out there regarding the multitasking vs. informed outcome:
what if scum was going for a PR strategy of limited use roles, ie; 1-shot vig, 1-shot PGO, 1-shot commuter, 1-shot watcher, 1-shot redirector, N3 vig, vengeful etc.
there's no real value in having multitasking if by the time it'll come in handy (being a solo mafioso in mid-to-late game) the team has already used all its power.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
good point. lets add that to the list too.In post 120, Infinity 324 wrote:Maybe they wanted a better fakeclaim, and thought that claiming the "town counterpart" to their role wouldn't work for whatever reason? Idk
enthusiastic & busy, which is usually a good sign early.In post 120, Infinity 324 wrote:Hoopla, thoughts on uncrowned?
i do think a couple of his questions seem surface-level, though. in some ways that is nature of the beast for early game discussions; everyone has to start somewhere.
but these sort of questions seem like meaningless busywork:
In post 41, Uncrowned wrote:With this thought process in mind, how many scum do you think there is between myself (14) Infinity (23) and Petapan (100000)?- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i like using data to capture broad trends, or to theorise in a general way - but when you zoom into a specific subset of the playerlist before flips, it is just guesswork.
to throw him a bone: my guess is a slightly higher than random amount in that specific group of three players.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
that is such a weird comment to make about skitter when almost all her posts are one-liners. there's literally only one of her posts that is 4+ sentences long.In post 275, JacksonVirgo wrote:I wasn't really meaning super long ones. Just the paragraph ones, where it's more than a sentence.
why pick out her?
especially when there --
*sorry, splitting up this post because it's getting pretty long.
1/2- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
looks to me like he threw out a surface-level offhand 'read' on skitter, then when someone pressed him on it, he just made up some BS and doubled down on it when pressed again.In post 304, Something_Smart wrote:Why is that weird thought more likely to come from scum than town?
i think if this was a genuine town observation, it's more likely for him to have had this thought about me (someone who has actually posted walls).
that's where you're wrong!In post 303, Infinity 324 wrote:Hoopla, I'm pretty sure you're too good of a player to buy this reasoning.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
at first, i assumed it was probably an error and that jackson must have swapped me & skitter in his head. but he was explicitly asked that:In post 312, Something_Smart wrote:If they did misremember, that's obviously not alignment indicative, so what makes you think it was a fabrication rather than an error?
if it was an error, it would have been revealed then.In post 269, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Nah I mean skitterIn post 263, Infinity 324 wrote: Do you mean hoopla? I get the feeling she's known as the setup speccer so it's kind of expected of her.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
this is an aside, but you're one of thoseIn post 316, Something_Smart wrote:I don't know. It seems more unskitterly than anything else.
My instinct is to say that it's more likely scum looking to grab towncred by pointing out why she shouldn't be townread, but I don't know if skitter thinks like that."don't vote until absolutely sure"type characters, no?- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
In post 358, Something_Smart wrote:...ish. I'm quite reserved with my vote, especially on day 1, but it has less to do with surety and more that I see early votes as causing more problems than they solve. Also I'm afraid of making decisions.
yes, we were. and i was shocked to discover it took you beyond page 50 to lay down your first vote.In post 359, Something_Smart wrote:We literally just played together, was I not like that in that game?
i am fascinated by the stoic observers afraid to jump in the waters.
a handy tip: when in doubt, don't be afraid to sheep ol' hoopla.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
hang on.In post 547, Hoopla wrote:oh my, i've fallen behind already.
is it too early for me to start scolding the chatterboxes? do i need to prepare my "balance of voices" speech?
i just made a stunning realisation that these are seven day deadlines. serves me right for skimming the OP!
i take back my post 547. spam away brave townsfolk.
~~
i also just realised jackson virgo is in the group of 4's. this is shocking play on my part. there's no way i'm executing from that bracket on D1.
i apologise to jackson virgo for my overeagerness.
UNVOTE:- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
there is max one scum amongst us 4's, unless a zany gambit is afoot.In post 555, JacksonVirgo wrote:Can I ask why me being in the group of 4's makes you not want to yeet me? Also don't apologize for playing the game- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
it's never happened in 15 games.In post 562, JacksonVirgo wrote:I don't understand, why wouldn't scum do that. I could remember wrong but I think multiple scum picked the same number in the last PyP I played I'll go have a look
pedit: I thought you were talking about what I was saying on other people
well, actually. it happened once due to a mod error of making the scumteam pick numbers without pregame coordination.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i'm finding it difficult to analyse the rapid-fire conversational style of this game.
so, in lieu of detailed analysis, i'm simply going to shoot from the hip with some intuitive impressions. here we go:
lilith- dodged the pressure of her wagon when it was at it peak momentum, which is a shame. now that she's around, she seems fluffy and whimsical. on pure intuition leaning town, but generally i find this player archetype hard to read. i'll likely be relying on group wisdom to guide me here - seems other folks know her meta.
dunnstral- played a game as scum against him recently, and he was a dominant voice on D1 that seemed quite obviously town. granted, i had confirmed info that game which can sometimes trick you into thinking someone is more town than they actually are, but i haven't seen similar town energy from him yet.
skitter- she clearly seems the most town to me. there's a chance i'm mistaking "most town" for "most competent", but if that's the case, she'll either be NK'ed early or be BOP'ed if she's still alive on D3+. i'm probably not going to spend much time focusing on her.
davesaz- under-the-radar somewhat. not a crime per se in a game this fast, but given it's (theoretically) easier to stream-of-conscious spam through the pages as town, under-the-radar seems a viable factor to consider in a D1 execution. hasn't done anything outright scummy, but from a POE perspective he is suss given i have mostly town-leanings.
something_smart- the other shining star along with skitter that i'll likely wait until they're NK'ed or BOP'ed. my only gripe is i wish he didn't cherish his vote like a mint condition star wars action figure. pull it out of the box man!
uncrowned- i'm a believer in awarding town points for super active players (as annoying as they are). a few of his posts have felt cosmetic, but i suppose when you throw out as many nets as he does, some will come back empty. i don't know. i've been skimming his posts recently, and i shamelessly admit to this fact, if only as passive-aggressive way to guilt-trip him into a "quality over quantity" mindset. regardless, as most active poster, he gets a pass for now.
infinity 324- i think his handling of the jackson virgo episode was very level-headed (given i now realise JV is prob-town). i think he could have easily been sucked into going along with my logic, or at least not played devil's advocate in a way to throw the brakes on what could have been a fast wagon if there was less resistance. leaning town.
petapan- i have a vague uneasiness with peta's willingness to go to bat for my parade of naked voting. a part of me feels like it's early buddying, but it could also be we both share a similar philosophy about voting/wagoning. leaning scum so far. she also tricked me into attacking a fellow member of the 4 bracket!
~~
i'm stopping here, as the 5's (pine and DGB) haven't entered the game yet and unless someone in the 4's scumslips in a big way i'm not voting there. so, realistically i'm probably going to want to execute a singleton.
no slamdunk scumreads yet, but here's a rough idea of my current preferred order:
petapan
dunnstral
davesaz
lilith
uncrowned
infinity 324
something_smart
skitter
(pine, dgb)
(the 4's)
VOTE: petapan- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
In post 588, Uncrowned wrote:Hoopla
Why is JV not in your readings?
I also don't really like your read on me. My activity isn't what should make me town here. This read feels very low effort.
do you ever have those days where you make a to-do list of 10 different things you need to get done, get so overwhelmed by the prospect, that you procrastinate with TV or some other escape, then end up doing nothing on the list? when if you put your mind to it, you could have easily done 6 or 7 things, accepted that level of output and been satisfied with yourself, rather than doing nothing.In post 590, JacksonVirgo wrote:I don't like the fact they refuse to read in the 4s or whatnot, I feel that's just stupid for town to do.
day 1's in games this size are often like this for me.
i don't have the stamina these days to analyse an entire playerlist on D1 (especially in 7 day deadlines), so some kind of filtering is necessary for me in order for me to stay focused.
my preferred modus operandi is to sort through who i'm not willing to execute. this includes: obv-town, strong players who'll likely get NK'ed if they're town (so i don't need to bother sorting them), active/transparent posters (who seem like they'll be easy to read later), + other miscellaneous town influences.
this in turn creates a de facto execution pool that is small enough that i can focus on until we get some real information in the game (big wagons, claims, flips etc).
this game is unique in that it has other mechanical considerations to help the filtering process: the 4's.
i'm saying there's max one scum in the 4's which means either 1 or 0. if it's 1, it's 33% from my perspective (25% from a town player's perspective outside that bracket), but you're also forgetting about another subsection of games where its 0. of groupings of 4+, it's been observed to have been an all town group 50% of the time:In post 592, JacksonVirgo wrote:@Hoopla, I recall you saying there's likely one scum in the 4s. If so that's a 33% shot if you read in there yet you're choosing not to?
Spoiler: data
i'm well aware i'd make this appeal to data if by chance i was scum and ended up in a likely-town draft position, but i'll save you all the time and tell you now it isn't alignment indicative. i'd make this exact same argument as town, and am doing so now.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
In post 583, skitter30 wrote:Except town!her usually brings a lot more content, is more focused, doesn't ask inane questions which basically dont go anywhere (but this is something she does as scum!), and is capable of quickly becoming an obvtown force to be reckoned with
thanks for the intel. i'll be taking that into consideration.In post 584, skitter30 wrote:He has towngames like the one you describe, but he also has towngames where he's more underwhelming and absent
I approve of your assessment of me : thumbsup:
you seem to know lilith well. so, on her specifically, have you had a history of catching her as scum? any recommended scumgames of hers that you can link to that would typify her scumgame? maybe a couple as town that showcase her obvtown'ing it up?- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i'm ignoring themIn post 637, TheGoldenParadox wrote:sure, there might be 0 scum, but the especially problematic part is that she COMPLETELY ignores the 4s for reads purposes. thus, i think the scumteam including penguin and hoopla is extremely likely, and I also think that that third member of the scumteam ISN'T a 4 (because having 2 members as 4s and 1 member outside that group seems most reasonable from a scum!hoopla perspective). i would wager that this is a scum gambit that backfired because both me and JV also chose 4, therefore catapulting the two to the bottom of the draft pick instead of somewhere around the middle where they otherwise would be.for now. as the game progresses (and i have a better handle on the part of the game i'm focusing on), i'll start considering them more.
i mean, on day 1, we all ignore chunks of the playerlist. it isn't realistic to give meaningful analysis on every player. for example, you've completely ignored the following players:
dunnstral, davesaz, infinity, something_smart
i'm ignoring low% slots until later because of data. what's your excuse for ignoring those slots?
the reality is we're all in the same boat here; we all pick and choose what we want to focus on for D1. it's hypocritical to criticise me for ignoring slots when you've done so yourself, albeit in a more indirect way.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
is there a functional difference between voting out top of the draft vs. third? third is highly likely to be a PR too.In post 330, Dunnstral wrote:Also voting out Lilith who is top of the draft is not a good move, why are people starting there?
VOTE: skitter30
Because I don't like her vote and she can play like this as scum
what don't you like about her vote, as opposed to every other lilith voter?- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i see where you're coming from, but you're overthinking it.In post 685, Uncrowned wrote:
@HooplaIn post 600, Uncrowned wrote:Skitter and JV have also been relatively high posters but don't get mentioned at all in this regard.
This feels like scum lowkey discrediting me by boiling my ISO down to "active posting", not taking a hard stance on me but leaving the door open to putting suspicion on me later down the line.
You didn't really answer this.
Do you think this is an unfair criticism of your read on me, or do you see where I'm coming from?
i didn't take a hard stance on you because i don't have much of an opinion of you. it usually takes me a while to read low signal:noise players.
over-posting tends to be a town trait though, so i'm not so concerned about you yet.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
you and to a lesser extent dunnstral were my only scum leanings in that post?In post 687, petapan wrote:@Hoopla:
In post 599, petapan wrote:
this doesn't seem to really line up with what you've said about people?In post 576, Hoopla wrote:davesaz - under-the-radar somewhat. not a crime per se in a game this fast, but given it's (theoretically) easier to stream-of-conscious spam through the pages as town, under-the-radar seems a viable factor to consider in a D1 execution. hasn't done anything outright scummy, but from a POE perspective he is suss giveni have mostly town-leanings.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i know there's relevant stuff in there. my eyes just tend to glaze over when players comment on everything, though. when everything is worth commenting on, it's hard to know what he actually cares about.In post 691, davesaz wrote:If you're going to call Uncrowned a low signal:noise, I'm going to question whether you're actually reading or if you're merely looking at post count.
I did a quick skim and I don't see any fluff at all in that ISO. It's all game related commentary and pretty much spot on in terms of relevance.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
give me your reads on davesaz, dunnstral, infinity and something_smart first.In post 696, TheGoldenParadox wrote:hoopla, what are your reads on me, pp, and JV?- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
quantity over quality.In post 697, Uncrowned wrote:What do you mean by low signal?
to give an analogy: i worked with a designer recently on an art project, and she was hypercritical of every little detail. think a micromanager to the nth degree. over time i simply learned to filter out her comments as it was too distracting to take everything she said on board. it may have even led to me overlooking some good advice, because she couldn't pick her moments.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
ah, so that's why your radar is off about me. i appreciate your candour.In post 710, TheGoldenParadox wrote:townleaning on Infinity because i think he's making valid and helpful points and his mindset seems to be solvey, with genuine attempts to find town and scum. i don't think i have any chance at successfully reading SSbecause he's a very mechanical player and my reads on those are generally quite bad- if i had to give a read, extremely light townlean. dave is slightly weird because they seem to be focusing on me to a greater extent than they should be, and null on dunnstral because i don't have enough from them yet.
anyway, on to your question:
i get town vibes from penguin's one-liners.In post 696, TheGoldenParadox wrote:hoopla, what are your reads on me, pp, and JV?
i really didn't like JV's skitter-related posts. but since then i've come around to the idea of him being town. has a naive/innocent quality to his thread presence that is hard to fake.
if you weren't in the 4's i'd be vaguely suspicious of you, primarily because you've been overly focused on penguin/me. it feels like you've found a comfortable niche that allows you to churn out easy material, without expressing much curiosity for other parts of the game. ironically, it's the same behaviour you called davesaz "slightly weird" for.
but as i said, mechanically, you're just not that likely to be scum. i'd probably even execute some of my town-reads in the singletons over the scummiest 4, if that helps you get an idea on how i evaluate things.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
*shrug*In post 700, petapan wrote:but but you put him as suspicious from a POE perspective, but your townreads did not appear numerous or strong
i thought about this, and i really don't know what to say to this line of questioning. my town reads aren't strong, sure... but neither is my declaration of davesaz being "suss". the strength of that comment is relative to strength of my town reads.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i don't necessarily agree with that. eliminating, say, a scum-vig is a HUGE swing in town's favour (as we saw in the last PYP game), whereas losing a town vig sucks, but isn't the end of the world.In post 758, Something_Smart wrote:I mean yes but not that good of a thing.
It's much worse for town to lose a PR than it is for scum to lose a PR.
i think people underestimate the power of scum roleblockers too. an active scum RB allows scum to neutralise twice as much town power per night (NK + RB).
generally speaking, my observation of the current meta is towns are far too scared to execute a player just because they claim a PR. so to see this level of enthusiasm for pressuring high draft picks is very refreshing. sometimes to execute scum, you have to risk losing PR's.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i can assure you i was being a hilarious jokester.In post 782, JacksonVirgo wrote:Not to me, it seems like a genuine read- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
also, i am late to the party on this one, but i thought this was some spicy logic from PP:
looked to me like infinity was stretching to give credit for a rather arbitrary collection of reads.In post 735, PenguinPower wrote:
So...if dgb had made the same post but with the reads reversed you would get the same out of it?In post 732, Infinity 324 wrote:There were a bunch of posts where I was like “ok, I don’t agree that this post makes someone more towny/scummy, but I see how someone could think that”.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
current status: sipping a coffee and reading through skitter's lilith-links.
i'm trusting skitter taking the lead on this one. skitter's a good pick for town, and i'm generally willing to sheep good town players on specific meta-claims like this (particularly on D1 when my alternative is usually utility-executing).
i also think we should get a claim. i think the first E-1 on D1 should always happen by the halfway mark or so, as you want time in the event of a town-looking claim to reorganise. and given we have no real counterwagon, i don't want to end up in a situation where we end up scrambling on deadline to organise a new execution. they never end well.In post 829, petapan wrote:fine w/ getting a claim given we're somewhere close to halfway thru the day but also have something else i'm writing up- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
a couple people picked up that this looked like a scumslip:
turns out that was just a typo?In post 840, Infinity 324 wrote:Actually town doesn’t have a tracker right? Honestly I feel like skitter is confident enough that we maybe just lim lilith here. But I think we should talk about it more.
PEdit: you didn’t need to put it to L-1 though?
but!
when i was reading the latest poststhisactually caught my eye as a perspective slip:
does this imply he knows lilith is town? or am i out to lunch here? someone help me.In post 833, Infinity 324 wrote:I mean scum already knows she’s a powerful PR- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
hmm.In post 862, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't think hoopla really believes I would add "if she's town" to the end of that statement if I'm town but not when I'm scum.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i don't know. maybe? i'm definitely guilty of reading too much into things sometimes.In post 873, Infinity 324 wrote:Am I BoP’ing you too much? I feel like it’s such a level 0 thing that people get scumread for all the time but is just NAI. Like we’re clearly assuming she’s town for the sake of argument there, otherwise there’s no risk in limming Lilith.
the crux of it is, it caught my eye, so i threw it to the wall to see if it would stick.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
this is alarming to me.In post 920, Dunnstral wrote:A lot of people just hopped off of Lilith. From l-1 to l-5
when a wagon collapses for no apparent reason, it's usually because it was artificially inflated (ie; scum driven), which implies lilith is town. skitter was the only person who put in real effort for her lilith vote. everyone else seemed to be riding on her coattails.
who's scum?
i think DGB/davesaz was the tipping point and most suspect. i probably prefer davesaz over DGB, if only because DGB is doubled up with pine.
VOTE: davesaz- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
once a simpleton always a simpleton.In post 909, Infinity 324 wrote:Random thought that better describes why I scumread hoopla: I think she’s approaching the game pretty simplistically while appearing to be thoughtful.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i'm a cop IRL.In post 929, Hoopla wrote:@DGB
are you scum? i want you to look me in the eye and tell me the truth.
and if a cop asks you a question it's against the law to lie.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
no wait, it's the other way around. if you ask a cop if they're a cop, legally they have to tell you.In post 930, Hoopla wrote:i'm a cop IRL.
and if a cop asks you a question it's against the law to lie.
regardless, my question stands:
are you scum?- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i'm trying to catch up. if i don't get on the podium, i'll be disappointed!In post 932, Uncrowned wrote:HOOPLA STOP SPAMMING OH MY GOD- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
please don't interfere with my line of questioning.In post 939, Dunnstral wrote:
No they don'tIn post 931, Hoopla wrote:if you ask a cop if they're a cop, legally they have to tell you.- Hoopla
-
Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
DGB, you dodged my interrogation.In post 1013, DrippingGoofball wrote:Like I'm not jibbing with anyone, to me, mafia is comedy, and it's like I'm at a funeral.
highly suspect. - Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla
- Hoopla