Open 798 | PYPX/Y+I/M | Game Over!
Forum rules
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
no that is hooplas trickIn post 30, skitter30 wrote:Also obligatory max one scum in each of the sets of 4's and 5's, imofree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
yes she had all her team pick 4. very clever but unfortunately i have seen through itIn post 35, skitter30 wrote:
you mean she normally makes that observation or that scum!her would deliberately double up?In post 31, petapan wrote:
no that is hooplas trickIn post 30, skitter30 wrote:Also obligatory max one scum in each of the sets of 4's and 5's, imofree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
i did it because the idea of bidding a million was funny to meIn post 48, Hoopla wrote:
i want to say peta's bid of a million is another brazen, highly suspicious scum move cooked up in the PT...In post 41, Uncrowned wrote:With this thought process in mind, how many scum do you think there is between myself (14) Infinity (23) and Petapan (100000)?
...but she's already pointed the finger at me, and we all know it's improper etiquette to accuse your accuser.
yes i am distancing myself from the mafia teamUncrowned wrote:
I actually saw it as some potential early distancing from a scum buddy or two if there are any in that group. Might be smart to keep track of how these players flip as the game progressesIn post 58, JacksonVirgo wrote:I think peta may have slipped up there if they're scum or just completely subconsciously just TR'd me and slipped that. Unsurefree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
what'd you like about it, anyway
free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
naked wagon vote from a sufficiently high level player is null, response seems a bit forced imoIn post 68, Uncrowned wrote:
Being second to vote someone during RVS instead of voting someone new is something I generally did in my town games when I used to play. I feel like in the past it has helped generate discussion than a vote on someone else wouldIn post 65, petapan wrote:what'd you like about it, anyway
VOTE: Uncrownedfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
naked vote on you, you want to seem unbothered by it, so you go out to compliment it even though it's pretty much null. nervous energy to it you putting out cockamamie theories like me distancing from a teammate by making jokes about the 4sIn post 79, Uncrowned wrote:Id actually like to go more in depth on this. Do you think scum goes out of their way to comment on something relatively obscure like Dripping's naked vote there? If so, why?free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
lmao dudeIn post 109, Uncrowned wrote:
That's assuming I actually care about being voted this early into D1.In post 106, petapan wrote:
naked vote on you, you want to seem unbothered by it, so you go out to compliment it even though it's pretty much null. nervous energy to it you putting out cockamamie theories like me distancing from a teammate by making jokes about the 4sIn post 79, Uncrowned wrote:Id actually like to go more in depth on this. Do you think scum goes out of their way to comment on something relatively obscure like Dripping's naked vote there? If so, why?
A similar assumption would be me saying you're worried about the theory I made, hence why you're coming at me now with this, since you didn't bring it up until after I came up with the theory.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
why should his vote necessarily be on one of you three, thoughIn post 199, Uncrowned wrote:We're the 3 with multiple votes on us and your vote in play is more useful than no vote i believefree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
tries to create the appearance of solving but felt pointless and arbitraryIn post 219, Something_Smart wrote:
how is that a busywork questionIn post 213, petapan wrote:busywork questionfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
i will tell you this is correct before hoopla does (i am town this game tho)In post 226, Something_Smart wrote:
From my limited experience of peta I doubt that level of antagonism would be out of scum-peta's range.In post 224, Infinity 324 wrote:I also feel like peta is being a bit more antagonistic than scum usually are this early.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
eh it's a level 1 scumbo move to go "hey x do you have any reads"In post 229, Something_Smart wrote:
It's not pointless? The point is to learn if I have any reads.In post 225, petapan wrote:tries to create the appearance of solving but felt pointless and arbitrary
And it's not arbitrary, because he noted that I'd participated but hadn't shared any reads yet.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
nahIn post 252, davesaz wrote:
light buddying?In post 227, petapan wrote:also lmao at people asking something_smart to "vote" or if he "has reads". he exists on a different plane from us mere mortals
no? what gave you the impression i was "locked in"? i was poking at him for my amusement then infinity made a bad vote so i went thereIn post 259, JacksonVirgo wrote:Why unvote here dude, I thought you were locked in on scum!uncrowned?
free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
In post 258, JacksonVirgo wrote:Skitter is probably town from all this, but all that talk about setup stuff is a bit ehIn post 261, JacksonVirgo wrote:
All their long-ass posts, I just feel scum wouldn't put all that effort in.In post 260, Infinity 324 wrote:
What are you referring to?In post 258, JacksonVirgo wrote:Skitter is probably town from all this
handing out an easy townread for bad reasons is scummyIn post 265, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Yeah alright, but this is townie.In post 262, skitter30 wrote:Obligatory: dont townread me for that, i'm fully capable of writing/efforting such posts as scum, etcfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
are you fucking kidding meIn post 275, JacksonVirgo wrote:
I wasn't really meaning super long ones. Just the paragraph ones, where it's more than a sentence.In post 274, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm not seeing many long posts from skitter though?
VOTE: jacksonvirgofree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
what bothered me is the emphasis of form over contentIn post 325, skitter30 wrote:I dont think jv's comment is as bad as its being made out to be
why her, out of all the lilith voters?In post 330, Dunnstral wrote:Also voting out Lilith who is top of the draft is not a good move, why are people starting there?
VOTE: skitter30
Because I don't like her vote and she can play like this as scumfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
do you expect it to work if you say it thoIn post 338, skitter30 wrote:her reactions to being wagoned upon actually showing up will be quite insightful. (She herself has acknowledged on more than one occasion that i'm quite good at reading her, i can pull quotes if necessary)free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
i question the value in publicly announcing you expect someone's reaction to being voted to be insightful before that person actually reactsIn post 345, Uncrowned wrote:
I haven't played too many games outside of newbie queue, but do you think most experienced players getting early wagoned don't already know it's kind of a reaction test?In post 341, petapan wrote:is defending yourself against dunnstral so important that you need to blow up your attempt to test lilith before she respondsfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
please respondIn post 374, petapan wrote:do u actually think it was an early bus wagon lolfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
In post 389, PenguinPower wrote:
I will elim Pine on principal.In post 387, skitter30 wrote:ok having 3 players lurk when we have 7 day deadlines is like :/free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
it's in his first post? "opportunistic wagon hopping". strong noob vibes.In post 466, davesaz wrote:Indirectly scumreading Hoopla but nowhere in this ISO is it made clear why Hoopla would be a scumread.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
it's whatever category you want to put "person who gets concerned by early game wagon hopping"In post 470, davesaz wrote:
Eh, fair enough. I'm used to much more though it is extremely early still.In post 467, petapan wrote:
it's in his first post? "opportunistic wagon hopping". strong noob vibes.In post 466, davesaz wrote:Indirectly scumreading Hoopla but nowhere in this ISO is it made clear why Hoopla would be a scumread.
I'm certain TGP has been in enough games to not be considered in that category. I'm just not sure I have a strong meta handle yet.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
don't let your dreams be memesIn post 465, skitter30 wrote:It's even worse in that there's next to no way i'm getting you voted out today, probably
VOTE: lilithfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
huge fan btwIn post 576, Hoopla wrote:petapan - i have a vague uneasiness with peta's willingness to go to bat for my parade of naked voting. a part of me feels like it's early buddying, but it could also be we both share a similar philosophy about voting/wagoning. leaning scum so far. she also tricked me into attacking a fellow member of the 4 bracket!free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
this doesn't seem to really line up with what you've said about people?In post 576, Hoopla wrote:davesaz - under-the-radar somewhat. not a crime per se in a game this fast, but given it's (theoretically) easier to stream-of-conscious spam through the pages as town, under-the-radar seems a viable factor to consider in a D1 execution. hasn't done anything outright scummy, but from a POE perspective he is suss giveni have mostly town-leanings.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
bothIn post 593, JacksonVirgo wrote:Peta did you really choose 100000000000000000000000000 for the lulz or did you want a unique number thinking more people would have grouped numbers?
Honest or I yeet you to oblivion with my N3 vigilante shot (jkjk unless)
you seem to be commenting on a lot of trivial thingsfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
admittedly, however, there are game theory reasons to think at least one of the low number picks is scum (and yes, i am aware that scum have subverted this in past games by all picking high numbers). there are better reasons than numbers to think lilith is scum, thoughIn post 595, JacksonVirgo wrote:I lowkey have a small inkling that mafia chose 2,3 and 4 respectively. That would make Lilith, Dunnstral and one of the 4's mafia which I'll have to do some looking into but ngl that would make sense to me as I would probably try that.
Maybe 3,4,5 instead but you get my gist. Although mafia choosing informed while doing that is probably counterintuitive so maybe not?
i do somewhat like the "i would probably try that"free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
i don't think it's a trivial accusation to say a lot of the focus in your catchup was on posts that i found to be fairly uninteresting and seemed to avoid a lot of the more substantial discussions in the threadIn post 605, JacksonVirgo wrote:
You seem to be shading me in trivial ways. I just didn't believe you when you saidIn post 601, petapan wrote:
bothIn post 593, JacksonVirgo wrote:Peta did you really choose 100000000000000000000000000 for the lulz or did you want a unique number thinking more people would have grouped numbers?
Honest or I yeet you to oblivion with my N3 vigilante shot (jkjk unless)
you seem to be commenting on a lot of trivial things
Should I read more into you blatantly lying or what?In post 64, petapan wrote:i did it because the idea of bidding a million was funny to me
where's the lie thofree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
nahIn post 610, JacksonVirgo wrote:You said that the idea of bidding was funny to you, which is lying by omission considering what you were asked. And considering your number I find it quite suspicious that you decided to withhold that information.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
you're confirmed scum and we're hunting your partnersIn post 678, Pine wrote:Cool. What did I miss?free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
i don't have a frame of reference there but it felt like an inauthentic thought process to assume someone pressure voting you early day 1 is mafia who is protecting their partner, because when does that happen, really? The much more obvious strategy is staying out of someone's way and then NKing them. so in that sense it feels contrived, like it's attempting to emulate a town mindset in response to pressure but gets it wrongIn post 680, davesaz wrote:In post 669, PenguinPower wrote:yes - mostly her posting on ss and skitterThanks -- yeah I see those and have somewhat mixed feelings on it. It seems rather far fetched as a theory, but I'm not sure it's AI to be concerned about a possible hack job. In particular what motivation would scum have to bring up that type of concern early on vs. trying to ride it out? On the other hand there are some people who try to play the martyr as scum in that situation. Town in the #1 position have to be constantly on the lookout for scum trying a cheap miselim. I don't know lilith well enough to use meta. So yeah, big ball of undecided here.
free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
@Hoopla:
In post 599, petapan wrote:
this doesn't seem to really line up with what you've said about people?In post 576, Hoopla wrote:davesaz - under-the-radar somewhat. not a crime per se in a game this fast, but given it's (theoretically) easier to stream-of-conscious spam through the pages as town, under-the-radar seems a viable factor to consider in a D1 execution. hasn't done anything outright scummy, but from a POE perspective he is suss giveni have mostly town-leanings.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
but but you put him as suspicious from a POE perspective, but your townreads did not appear numerous or strongIn post 692, Hoopla wrote:
you and to a lesser extent dunnstral were my only scum leanings in that post?In post 687, petapan wrote:@Hoopla:
In post 599, petapan wrote:
this doesn't seem to really line up with what you've said about people?In post 576, Hoopla wrote:davesaz - under-the-radar somewhat. not a crime per se in a game this fast, but given it's (theoretically) easier to stream-of-conscious spam through the pages as town, under-the-radar seems a viable factor to consider in a D1 execution. hasn't done anything outright scummy, but from a POE perspective he is suss giveni have mostly town-leanings.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
for a lot of those posts i didn't understand what was towny/scumy about them. didn't have a problem with most of the names placed in the townreads but the attempted piggybacking off tgp is a little concerningIn post 728, Infinity 324 wrote:I could see why she thought certain posts were towny and scummyfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
but if she's a scum pr that would be a good thing wouldn't itIn post 749, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't think we want to lim lilith today cause she's a PR, time for a hoopla wagon?free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
they got zero utility out of the 1-shot vig (in spot #4) because town didn't care about draft order and eliminated them day 1. not gonna weight my reads by draft position.In post 756, davesaz wrote:
It's about time someone had the guts to say this.In post 749, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't think we want to lim lilith today cause she's a PR, time for a hoopla wagon?
In the game I just got done modding, scum had 2 PRs and got zero utility out of either one.In post 754, petapan wrote: but if she's a scum pr that would be a good thing wouldn't it
The top 4 or so slots are self-resolving. If they get NK'd then that's painful but it's life. If they don't get NK'd and there isn't a save to explain it then we eliminate them later.free crypto - petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan