Born again with fascist cravings
Still, you made me president
Human rights will soon go 'way
I am now your Shah today
Now I command all of you
to VOTE: SirCakez
absolutely notIn post 80, Brian Skies wrote:Oh are we all just mass-claiming today?
possible for bm, unlikely for mwb. gut says mwnn's claim isn't scummy.In post 97, L4pe wrote:+1In post 86, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:absolutely notIn post 80, Brian Skies wrote:Oh are we all just mass-claiming today?
i place 60% odds on 1 or 2 scum claiming here to encourage others to do it
i'm the senile oneIn post 121, Gamma Emerald wrote:tell me which head tags as what
because depending on who this is I might have concerns
not seeing what you're seeingIn post 148, Cabd wrote:Cakes, I, and a lot of the deathy, townread you in antechamber. This is NOT what I'm feeling here.
I am probably gonna have to do meta homework before surgery now, ugh, gods.
my assumption based on sample roles are that drivers are for the most part, functionally VTs that get to steer night actions. outing the class of roles in that sense amounts to outing PRs which is obviously a bad ideaIn post 167, Cabd wrote:I would literally rather rely on blind pairing luck than this shit day one. Massclaim is gonna be a TERRIBLE look, if we go that route, bad shit's gonna happen. I don't like bad shit happening.In post 162, Cabd wrote:Because scum almost certainly have a role that states something like "You can pick a player and if they are a blade XYZ SUPERBAD STUFF HAPPENZ"In post 155, beeboy wrote:I was considering not having this conversation but I am going to do it anyway.
Why is claiming sub optimal?
Either select drivers should claim so we can get some amount of actions going through or we should full claim and organize the largest amount of actions possible.
Let's say hypothetically me and firebringer agree to connect up. Then there is a 50% chance we share the same trait as a driver/blade and we do nothing.
Idk do you think scum have such strong anti claim tools we should just throw away actions?
maybe laterIn post 208, Fermis Flames wrote:Reasonings? I have some concerns in that direction, as well as in Firebringer's.
~strange
pretty grubby post, given he just said he was trying to break it offIn post 349, Battle Mage wrote:said SirCakez, whilst himself boasting 33 posts in under an hour.In post 343, SirCakez wrote:excessive posting is antitown
yeah. way it shifted from him attacking cakez for not wanting to engage him to calling him a hypocrite for not wanting excessive posting, when arguing with BM was why his post count was so high...felt like he's twisting things to paint cakez in a bad lightIn post 361, ManWithNoName wrote:Is grubby a bad thing in this sense?In post 357, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:pretty grubby post, given he just said he was trying to break it offIn post 349, Battle Mage wrote:said SirCakez, whilst himself boasting 33 posts in under an hour.In post 343, SirCakez wrote:excessive posting is antitown
the vice president tells me has a good track record of reading you although it's outdated. but we both think you're scummy.In post 366, Gamma Emerald wrote:well if you don't make things clear I'm gonna treat you with lowest common denominator on how bad your posting looks for the two of youIn post 154, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:i'm the senile oneIn post 121, Gamma Emerald wrote:tell me which head tags as what
because depending on who this is I might have concerns
which I'ma just say one of you probably shouldn't be pushing me legitimately at this point
bad voteIn post 461, unwnd wrote:NoName might just be like this and I doubt he cares if I'm voting him
VOTE: midwaybear
This however
bland, maybe, but first post came across as legitimate setup concern, and something like 282 is analysis, not posturing.In post 468, unwnd wrote:I think his help and posts are extraordinarily bland and serve no purpose other than to look townieIn post 463, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:bad voteIn post 461, unwnd wrote:NoName might just be like this and I doubt he cares if I'm voting him
VOTE: midwaybear
This however
But not
maybeIn post 483, Flavor Leaf wrote:Pretty sure Noraa is actual scum here, guys.
how recently was this? because i was in his most recent towngame that just ended a few days ago, and he was certainly not confident there. also, where's he "trying to pull out a solve"?In post 490, unwnd wrote:Last game I played with him (shoot me, this is all I have), his confidence was unbridled. I think anyone trying to pull out a solve that early is either baiting the room for more reads or they're not really worried about it being wrong cause they're scum if that makes senseIn post 485, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:bland, maybe, but first post came across as legitimate setup concern, and something like 282 is analysis, not posturing.In post 468, unwnd wrote:I think his help and posts are extraordinarily bland and serve no purpose other than to look townieIn post 463, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:bad voteIn post 461, unwnd wrote:NoName might just be like this and I doubt he cares if I'm voting him
VOTE: midwaybear
This however
But not
he doesn't really play with as much confidence anymore, can say that from having tried to do the homework on him recently. but feel good about him being town this game.In post 515, unwnd wrote:Couple months ago? I was scum in that game. He had great town tone and the initiative was there but a lot his posting were bordering between uncertainty/blind confidence if someone pushed him. His blind confidence lead him to some good reads but he just didn't have the authority to push them. I probably used solve in a stupid way, I was basically trying to say I feel his statements are too confident from a perspective of having played with him and just in general
0/2 tbqhIn post 534, MariaR wrote:Hey Guillotina didn't expect to see you here (It's Chelsea)
wanna vote Cakez or Regan and get a scum?
your meta being out of date makes sense for where the read is coming from anyway, i don't hate you for it, just telling you i don't think it's acccurateIn post 544, unwnd wrote:I think we agree to disagree, but I dug you being on Gamma so I don't really have any beef with you atmIn post 535, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:he doesn't really play with as much confidence anymore, can say that from having tried to do the homework on him recently. but feel good about him being town this game.In post 515, unwnd wrote:Couple months ago? I was scum in that game. He had great town tone and the initiative was there but a lot his posting were bordering between uncertainty/blind confidence if someone pushed him. His blind confidence lead him to some good reads but he just didn't have the authority to push them. I probably used solve in a stupid way, I was basically trying to say I feel his statements are too confident from a perspective of having played with him and just in general
the "other factors" are why i'm voting himIn post 563, MariaR wrote:Gamma's anger in this situation is NAI. As is most anger in mafia. I think he really is upset at BM and if he's a wolf he could just be honestly posting or upping it a little. Are we gonna catch scum Gamma off that theory? No, it'd be off other factors so I think it's best put to the side atm.
you're free to peruse his isoIn post 568, MariaR wrote:Can you quote them or catch me to speed?In post 566, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:the "other factors" are why i'm voting himIn post 563, MariaR wrote:Gamma's anger in this situation is NAI. As is most anger in mafia. I think he really is upset at BM and if he's a wolf he could just be honestly posting or upping it a little. Are we gonna catch scum Gamma off that theory? No, it'd be off other factors so I think it's best put to the side atm.
i don't expect to get a handle on every player in a large on day 1 and i get the sense from him i shouldn't be making any judgment early. seems fine so far.In post 577, unwnd wrote:I dislike that nobody had anything to say about Flavor Leaf despite me clearly asking
Until someone gives me a good reason I'm not letting scum have an excuse to townread him lol
that's because you're not supposed to bus on page 1
correct. because he's scum.In post 623, midwaybear wrote:It also just seems like your vote is based off pure dislike for his playstyle.
in short: because he's not attempting to sortIn post 629, midwaybear wrote:Why is it because gamma is scum compared to town him just really getting irked?In post 625, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:correct. because he's scum.
don't think "why me" is a reliable tellIn post 683, ManWithNoName wrote:But, yeah, I don't see this viewpoint from town on Cakez. Like, he's not going "Look at this read" it really feels like he's saying "Tell me why I'm scum!"
it's been 5 years since my last trophy run, the card is long since expiredIn post 692, Fermis Flames wrote:You're going to have to give up your EM card.In post 688, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:don't think "why me" is a reliable tellIn post 683, ManWithNoName wrote:But, yeah, I don't see this viewpoint from town on Cakez. Like, he's not going "Look at this read" it really feels like he's saying "Tell me why I'm scum!"
~ strange
shit i'm caughtIn post 705, ManWithNoName wrote:It's been 36 years since 84! Don't lie.In post 702, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:it's been 5 years since my last trophy run, the card is long since expiredIn post 692, Fermis Flames wrote:You're going to have to give up your EM card.In post 688, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:don't think "why me" is a reliable tellIn post 683, ManWithNoName wrote:But, yeah, I don't see this viewpoint from town on Cakez. Like, he's not going "Look at this read" it really feels like he's saying "Tell me why I'm scum!"
~ strange
have a slight townread on my good pal clint eastwoodIn post 722, midwaybear wrote:If I lose my conviction on Cakez, I will vote MWNN alongside Bell.
how do you have anything positive on her, and why mention this nowIn post 739, Gamma Emerald wrote:I kinda like Noraa rn but it’s still quite early wrt reading her
your post didn't even come up in preview edit, we were that closely in syncIn post 743, Cabd wrote:Too slow noob. I reserved this line of questioning first.In post 742, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:how do you have anything positive on her, and why mention this nowIn post 739, Gamma Emerald wrote:I kinda like Noraa rn but it’s still quite early wrt reading her
haha, i floated the idea of it being theater to the vice president but he thought it was too far-fetchedIn post 767, Brian Skies wrote:It's bizarre and my initial impression is that Gamma is probably trying to sacc himself to make BM look better.In post 654, unwnd wrote:Forgot to respond. Gamma/BM seems like a clear battle going on, what's your take on it?In post 616, midwaybear wrote:I remember it started sometime in May, but after checking it ended in July.
About BM, I didn't really townread him. I just find the way he plays to be a little grating personally, but Cakez reasons didn't seem too substantiated to me. Considering that Cakez apparently only played in BM scum games, it's a bit weird. I like that Cakez backed off though, but neither of them are really confident reads rn.
Afk
I could be wrong, but that's how it feels to me.
glad to see we're in agreementIn post 775, Battle Mage wrote:in short, I don't think I get any significant towncred from Gamma flipping scum.
the vice president would like to give the game his full undivided attention but isIn post 777, Fermis Flames wrote:Has the VP posted yet?In post 776, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:glad to see we're in agreementIn post 775, Battle Mage wrote:in short, I don't think I get any significant towncred from Gamma flipping scum.
i don't see what this game has to do with battle mageIn post 792, Gamma Emerald wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=84467
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=84480
Read me in both of these and tell me if you think I handle a second of being scum with BM after I made up my mind on him.
In addition, curious why people are voting me at this point. I have given reads, so what’s the fucking deal?
lmaoIn post 826, Fermis Flames wrote:Uhhhh you can’t vote us because we haven’t voted you yet for you to respond with this vote.
this is such a weird thing to say. like she's required to defend you because you called her town early?In post 1148, Gamma Emerald wrote:I had a light townread on you back when you had 6 postsIn post 1143, Noraa wrote:what townread?In post 1141, Gamma Emerald wrote:The fact Noraa dodged addressing my townread on her is pretty damn dodgy too
I’m not happy I stuck my neck out for you only to get repaid with betrayal and disregard
i did but i'm not seeing good justification for that feeling.In post 1239, Gamma Emerald wrote:Read further ):
because of her last couple posts?In post 1279, Fermis Flames wrote:Why the flip?In post 1276, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:was agreeing with bell on nora but i think i have to 180 now
emotional claim under relatively little pressure seems non-scum indicative for herIn post 1289, Fermis Flames wrote:They didn't have that impact on me. But, you do you.In post 1280, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:because of her last couple posts?In post 1279, Fermis Flames wrote:Why the flip?In post 1276, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:was agreeing with bell on nora but i think i have to 180 now
~ strange
i don't
i have never made a good post and i never willIn post 1326, Fermis Flames wrote:Spin requests that you stop making bad posts. Particularly if you're town.In post 1305, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:i don't
~ strange
i'll have you know i plan to win a landslide voteIn post 1353, Fermis Flames wrote:beeboy is my back pocket scum read.In post 1337, SirCakez wrote:prolly scum somewhere in that weird pool of people who aren't lurking but also aren't particularly active
people like (cobra, reagan bush, beeboy, Maria, MWNN)
and reagan is trying to be a dark horse in the running.
which partIn post 1385, Gamma Emerald wrote:WhyIn post 1382, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:gutread dunn as town but somewhat worried by him seeming to actually give a shit
because from what i have seen he frequently does very little as townIn post 1393, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why is him giving a shit a bad signIn post 1389, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:which partIn post 1385, Gamma Emerald wrote:WhyIn post 1382, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:gutread dunn as town but somewhat worried by him seeming to actually give a shit
good to know, that takes away some of my reservation thereIn post 1408, Gamma Emerald wrote:He also does little as scumIn post 1406, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:because from what i have seen he frequently does very little as townIn post 1393, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why is him giving a shit a bad signIn post 1389, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:which partIn post 1385, Gamma Emerald wrote:WhyIn post 1382, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:gutread dunn as town but somewhat worried by him seeming to actually give a shit
When he does do stuff though, I think him actually showing the level of engagement he is is actually a town tell
the only one i remember suggesting he's scum is cakez and it wasn't much of a serious read. but he's town.In post 1423, Gamma Emerald wrote:Given I don’t agree (and iirc so do a few others) with ffer’s read there, I disagree with this notion.In post 1420, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:he doesn't need to be more readable lmao
could be lld tbhIn post 1427, Bell wrote:Which scums tried to miseliminate him.
there's probably scum who voted you purely by math, just have to look and see whose reasons felt real and who was after you because they saw a targetIn post 1431, Gamma Emerald wrote:Tbh I doubt I was a scum led miselim given those dark misgivings I mentioned before