Extraversion - 56%
Agreeableness - 51%
Conscientiousness - 33%
Openness - 59%
Neuroticism - 57%
In reality I am just 100% neuroticism and nothing else, but they never quite ask the right questions.
I can tell you now that it's not a very good approach.In post 134, Amélie wrote:I am very intrigued by this player as I have never seen someone approach a game of mafia in this way.
It was only a vote to do with activity levels so it didn't interest me very much.In post 159, Grendel wrote:Im voting you. What are your thoughts on that?
In post 178, Frogsterking wrote:the statistics and psychographics will lead us further and faster than our pings.
I don't believe this at all. I believe that this is going to be a very long game.In post 184, Frogsterking wrote:; and you believe when dealing with incomplete information we're forced to rely on intuition or abductive reasoning because there is no other alternative.
Sit back, relax. See what transpires. Have a think about the game. Check to see if there are any new posts.In post 201, Grendel wrote:What is the best way to push the game state forward from your pov atm? Is it something you can do on your own?
I actually just love personality tests, like I can sit and do them all day. However I didn't think the method of trying to apply them to this game to figure out people's alignments or anything really was a very good or useful one.In post 209, Luca Blight wrote:I got a slight Town ping for how he was at first on board with the personality test and later turned against it. Perhaps as scum it would be easier to just stick to the chosen narrative, but overall not much to go on really.
I agree with this post and happy to get either of those players.In post 299, Lunar Martian wrote:I think this page says either Gamma or Luca is Mafia.
What would the 'something else' possibly be though?In post 312, Gamma Emerald wrote:Is this for irl reasons or something else?In post 310, Momrangal wrote:I'm also most definitely not giving this game the energy it deserves
Just I've seen that twice previously now and picked up on it and both times it came from mafia."Why did you do this, is it for theobvious reason that it obviously is, or is there some other reason?
Yeah I looked at that post and didn't like the first line very much.In post 385, Lunar Martian wrote:Something about this post feels off to me. Does anyone else see that?
OuchIn post 554, Galron wrote:especially after that last paranoid post where he though Luca was talking about him. That sounds like a caught (and not paranoid town) maf.
And there are fewer players (9 instead of 13 makes a huge difference), there are different players, it's an open setup, the roles are more basic, it took place at a different time in their life.....In post 705, Frogsterking wrote:You know Luca I was thinking about your case and I actually don't believe the meta change is AI, I think Lunar did better in the Newbie game because he was only in one game and the other players were new.
Yeah the fact that people spend 30 pages on day one rather than the four or so that it deserves is so weird to me.In post 768, Galron wrote:I don't think game solving on Day 1 is all that helpful. It's more distracting than anything. Let's get an elimination and a night under our belts and then assess where we're at.
What personality type is it?In post 872, Frogsterking wrote:There's a little voice inside my head that's talking me into hammering bugs.
Maybe I just can't be bothered because I find your personality stuff unbearable to read. What would I be 'nervous' about sitting at home on my laptop posting on an online forum? I'm like, somebody who barely ever gets nervous, 'neuroticism' comes in a lot of different forms. But you've completely free associated away from your personality type results there and are just speculating, making wrong assumptions, completely using your own imagination while using the language of the personality tests to try and justify and give credence to the fact that all of these observations about people you're making are complete fantasies you're inventing in your own head which don't map onto reality in any significant way whatsoever. Which you've been doing all game and it's like...I can't tell you how this is just my least favourite thing.In post 986, Frogsterking wrote:He did say that he's all-neuroticism in his response to the SSS so maybe he is nervous.
The only thing that stops me thinking that any of this is suspicious is that years and years back I used to spend a lot of time talking to people in personality type communities and so on online, and they literally all talk exactly like that, it's the weirdest thing. Which is why it's ironic that the player called me an 'archetype' somewhere earlier on in the game. Like you can think it's scummy behaviour, but it's identical to the behaviour of somebody who has discovered personality types for the first time and thinks they're the ultimate explanation for everything and are relevant in every situation involving people ever.In post 993, OutWorldER wrote:There's been a thought in the back of my mind since the beginning that Frogster just threw out the OCEAN test shit to look smart and accumulate early TR's while being able to throw out a bunch of nonsense to justify his pushes. Securing that thought in my mind is that he himself never shared his results and didn't even link a test in the beginning, refusing to, for some reason. It all seems in very bad faith.
I'm in favour of eliminating OutWorldER though.In post 1013, Frogsterking wrote:I don't see how scum!Trendall or scum!bugs are expecting to win the game playing today the way they have, unless they are expecting OutWorldER or some deep scum to carry them.
Lol I won't waste my time then. Let's all get this then because there was a fair amount of support for eliminating Lunar yesterday, so we can just like, get it done now.In post 1033, Lunar Martian wrote:who is there to defend me? Trendall.
I did two posts about you I think. One saidIn post 1044, Lunar Martian wrote:It's just odd, since Trendall seemed very confident
If I was mafia I'd have no reason to care if you're dead or not.In post 1057, Lunar Martian wrote:I'm Mafia and wanting me dead.
If you're going to 'solve the game', then actually he can, and it makes no difference because town will just eliminate all the mafia anyway. Like you tell us who the mafia are, we eliminate one tonight, then they kill a PR, then we get the second mafia, then...until we have won. So actually the only remaining thing that needs to happen in this game is that bugs tells Grendel who's in the neighbourhood and we're only a few posts away from this game being done and dusted.In post 1079, Grendel wrote:Knowing who is in the hood would've helpped me slove the game i think. But now you cant do that without narrowing the PoE for scum hunting town prs significantly.
Which to reiterate is 'Trendall had a townread on me and is therefore mafia'In post 1097, Frogsterking wrote:Lunar's surprising and compelling case on Trendall
I don't see how in one possibility one person can be 'obvious' and in another possibility the same person can be town. And 'obvscum possibly' is like...In post 1163, Frogsterking wrote:Right now I see two competing theories:
1) Luca, OutWorldER and Lunar are town, Bugs is obvscum possibly along with Trendall and there are one or more deep scum.
2) Galron, Trendall and Bugs are town, Lunar and OutWorldER are obvscum and there is one deep scum who in this scenario I propose as Gamma.
In post 178, Frogsterking wrote:the statistics and psychographics will lead us further and faster than our pings.
So it's going well then?In post 1176, Frogsterking wrote:I guess I will sheep you onto Trendall because he's annoying and doesn't do anything
The problem is is that you never really have a way of knowing whether the reason why you got away with whatever you were trying to do was because the person genuinely wasn't aware you're lying, or because there was just some sorta unstated social agreement there to like, both go along with it, white lies, that sorta thing.In post 1183, Lunar Martian wrote:And I feel like everyone knows how good a liar they are, especially if they do sometimes lie.