Mini 2186: Pokemon Battles [GAME OVER]
Forum rules
- Raya36
-
Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
You have nothing to worry about. If I got scum again I would have simply passed away
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Barely, but I amIn post 42, Red wrote:
..........are........you..........alive.........?In post 39, Raya36 wrote:You have nothing to worry about. If I got scum again I would have simply passed away
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Well sometimes when I get scum I cease to exist. So there's also thatIn post 43, Infinity Zero wrote:
So being alive is a towntell for you, got it. Any others I should know about?In post 39, Raya36 wrote:You have nothing to worry about. If I got scum again I would have simply passed away
-Inf- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
This is actually a good point. Easy to hide in a gimmick, especially this early on. Although it's 75 where I see the visible scumhunting. What were you referring to?In post 73, Chara wrote:i guess visibly scumhunting is being rather generous, but he does seem to be playing even with the limited communication, and i'm in no hurry to see it stop.- Raya36
-
Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Asking if I was alive was probably just something that fit well in the gimmick but I agree with the vote and also as I mentioned 75 supports this too.In post 100, Chara wrote:
asking if you were alive and the stressed Titus vote stood out to me as "actual gameplay" when the rest of Red's posts were just ellipses. it's really not much but it made me think he was paying attention.In post 91, Raya36 wrote:
This is actually a good point. Easy to hide in a gimmick, especially this early on. Although it's 75 where I see the visible scumhunting. What were you referring to?In post 73, Chara wrote:i guess visibly scumhunting is being rather generous, but he does seem to be playing even with the limited communication, and i'm in no hurry to see it stop.
i'm hoping Perfume's posts expand a bit more, too.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Wary is probably a better word. A negative utility claim can have you basically cleared and I'm not ready to fully assume you're not scum claiming this for the clear.In post 191, Titus wrote:
Why are you suspicious of my claim?In post 182, Raya36 wrote:Red, chara, jj, mistyx are fine
Titus claimed negative utility and I haven't figured out if I trust that yet
catboi rvs is now serious
Why is catboi now a serious push?
Why are Red and jj town?
Didn't like his vote on Mistyx. The reasoning doesn't make much sense.
Red for the reason chara and I talked about. jj for making me realize the deadlines are very short which should make players who may have also overlooked this do more. Scum could have just let the current gamestate go until it's too late to make a good decision.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Yeah, as mistyx said, I have very little interest in learning about your 2 scumreads. I'm asking you so I can read you better.In post 206, wellermanbob wrote:This is always such a silly line of questioning.
Do you think they have a greater chance of being scum than other players in the game? If so, why do you need my reasons?
If no, will me writing some reasons down be a genuine way of you reevaluating? Or is just rereading them yourself enough?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Just the some early town leans. We unfortunately don't have much to work with yet so they are on the weaker side.In post 211, Chara wrote:
i don't think Red's participation has been that AI, and while the rest of this is pretty much... fine, i don't know if it's town.In post 192, Raya36 wrote:Wary is probably a better word. A negative utility claim can have you basically cleared and I'm not ready to fully assume you're not scum claiming this for the clear.
Didn't like his vote on Mistyx. The reasoning doesn't make much sense.
Red for the reason chara and I talked about. jj for making me realize the deadlines are very short which should make players who may have also overlooked this do more. Scum could have just let the current gamestate go until it's too late to make a good decision.
actually, why would an ascetic claim clear anyone? Titus could be scum and claiming truthfully.
Maybe I'm not fully understanding the claim. I'll look back into it.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
You suggested specifically to Infinity. Why can't we reevaluate and find someone else. The first wagon of the day doesn't need to be the eliminationIn post 270, wellermanbob wrote:I suggested claiming before we have 24hrs left does that seem overly rushed to you?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I disagree with Chara being pockety but I don't think the read is bad considering how early it was. Nothing else has particularly stood out to me. You're null for now
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Give me a list of all the reasons why Infinity is scum or a good eliminationIn post 275, wellermanbob wrote:
Why would we do that right now lmao? This is a great wagon.In post 273, Raya36 wrote:Why can't we reevaluate and find someone else- Raya36
-
Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Scum arent that defensive and making a massive case about someone who's pushing them this early.
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
How are you so confident already?In post 293, wellermanbob wrote:
I don't think this is TvT tbh? Like there's a brewing anti- bob sentiment in the thread which is, if you'll allow me the assumption of being correct on my scumread of Infinity, makes sense as the pieces start to fall together.In post 288, Titus wrote:Y'all can T v T. Meanwhile Perfume has been dodging this thread since we got out of RVS.
Chara still seems fine to me. I can understand the Bob TR.
This feels forced.In post 337, wellermanbob wrote:Oh I don't need you to defend me Chara, I need you to reach across the aisle to the half the game that feels content to just waft around at the moment- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
So you're voting a gimmick account for playing to their gimmick?In post 380, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:I think so too. Town generally tries to make themselves readable so I think Red has a better chance of flipping scum than any of the other wagons.
VOTE: Red Flavor
I’m actually shocked that they haven’t received a single vote yet. They aren’t making reads but by obfuscating their posts, people can get the incorrect sense that they’re actually doing something.
I still think catboi could be scum. I really dislike the mistyx vote. The reasoning given was that she isn't acting as excited to roll town as she said which means absolutely nothing. The scumreads on red and Akari/Mara aren't good either. Both come across as easier pushes right now due to Red's low posting and gimmick, and Akari/Mara's lack of good explanation on the Bob vote. I'd expect town to question Akari/Mara, not immediately place a vote.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
He voted Titus then explained the reason was his overconfidence in the town reads. And then voted Bob for being evasive to my questions.In post 403, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Alright, then can you be the Red whisperer and explain to me wtf you think he’s actually saying? All I got from his ISO is one post weirdly shading Titus and another one where the referenced bob who he also apparently didn’t like and I don’t think he explained that either.In post 401, Raya36 wrote:I find red fine to read actually. Maybe our disagreement there is where the issue is. I found his posts that contained content were good. The nature of the gimmick would make it more difficult to post but I still see an effort.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I get we're pressed for time but I don't think the way you approached that vote was good. If you scumread red and mistyx too why not question them at the same time?In post 404, catboi wrote:
WEIn post 397, Raya36 wrote:I still think catboi could be scum. I really dislike the mistyx vote. The reasoning given was that she isn't acting as excited to roll town as she said which means absolutely nothing. The scumreads on red and Akari/Mara aren't good either. Both come across as easier pushes right now due to Red's low posting and gimmick, and Akari/Mara's lack of good explanation on the Bob vote. I'd expect town to question Akari/Mara, not immediately place a vote.
HAVE
LESS
THAN
TWO
DAYS
If in talking to them I get the impression I am wrong and that they are town I will happily but at this point in time I believe the added pressure is a good thing.
(;≧皿≦)- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I think that second post was more relief of not getting scum again rather than enthusiasm for getting town. But I do see where you're coming from about her iso being very underwhelming though.In post 405, catboi wrote:as for the misty thing...her second post was about how "happy" she was to roll town, one of those early things people say to try to look town. Since then, this is what she's produced:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... er_sort=Go
A really underwhelming level of input that doesn't much seem to reflect what she said in her second post. Where is the enthusiasm? Where's the scumhunting? It's all very dispassionate.
Is it slight and maybe silly reasoning? Yes. But for an early game read I don't think it was bad and certainly wouldn't argue Misty has towntold.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
In post 407, catboi wrote:
What about his two posts of real content was good?In post 401, Raya36 wrote:I find red fine to read actually. Maybe our disagreement there is where the issue is. I found his posts that contained content were good. The nature of the gimmick would make it more difficult to post but I still see an effort.
This is fine for an early observation/read. Titus did display confidence when stating some people were town with no reasoning behind and while I don't necessarily agree with the read, Red didn't need to start posting AI content and could have slid by with more pure gimmick without raising much suspicion.In post 75, Red wrote:Tit͞us̷'͟s ̸ey̨es ̷ẃer̵e͡ e͠g̶g̴s̨ of̷ ͏un̛s͡t̨abĺe͏ cry͝s͠t͟al҉, ́w͢h͜o̵s͟e͠ ͞n̴a͘m̕e͏ w͢a̶s͏ ̸po̴int̀i͏n͜g͞ ͏o҉ut t͝he ͏ơb͞v̸i͢o͞us̛, ͘a͢nd spo͟u̵ti̕n҉g͡ a ̨h͏um̢mi̢n̵g f͟or͡e̵s̴t̕ ͡ơf͞ ̧o҉v͜e̸rc̛oǹfide͢ņc̨e
This is also fine, although surface level. My initial impression of Bob was that he was scummy for being evasive but when scum try to be evasive they aren't so blatant. But also in this post appears to be a townlean on me as it states I was trying to solve Bob.In post 254, Red wrote:In post 206, wellermanbob wrote:This is always such a silly line of questioning.
Do you think they have a greater chance of being scum than other players in the game? If so, why do you need my reasons?
If no, will me writing some reasons down be a genuine way of you reevaluating? Or is just rereading them yourself enough?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I already kind of expanded on the Titus part in my last post.In post 412, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Okay I see your point but I don’t think that necessarily makes them town either because neither of those posts are something scum couldn’t make either. I also don’t share the view that Titus has been overconfident at all. I make reads like that all the time, I think that’s protown more than anything. Can you show me where bob was being “evasive”? I find his adversarial attitude kind’ve offputting so it’s difficult for me to discern that?In post 408, Raya36 wrote:
He voted Titus then explained the reason was his overconfidence in the town reads. And then voted Bob for being evasive to my questions.In post 403, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Alright, then can you be the Red whisperer and explain to me wtf you think he’s actually saying? All I got from his ISO is one post weirdly shading Titus and another one where the referenced bob who he also apparently didn’t like and I don’t think he explained that either.In post 401, Raya36 wrote:I find red fine to read actually. Maybe our disagreement there is where the issue is. I found his posts that contained content were good. The nature of the gimmick would make it more difficult to post but I still see an effort.
This is mainly what I'm referring to when I call Bob evasive but there are other smaller instances:In post 205, Raya36 wrote:Yeah I definitely didn't know for sure if that meant you actually scumread them or not. Why do you scumread them?In post 206, wellermanbob wrote:This is always such a silly line of questioning.
Do you think they have a greater chance of being scum than other players in the game? If so, why do you need my reasons?
If no, will me writing some reasons down be a genuine way of you reevaluating? Or is just rereading them yourself enough?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I'm really leaning towards Bob just having a different playstyle and not being necessarily scummy. Did we ever find out if Bob is an alt or from a different site?In post 417, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Yeah, I kind’ve see what you mean here. This does somewhat concern me. If you’re going to hardpush a slot, you should be prepared to make a case against them rather then expect others to somehow telepathically understand what you’re seeing. This was precisely the point I was making about Chara that I can understand suspicion but bob is acting like it should be blatantly obvious to us all that IZ is scum and I think bob is confibiased on them based on a few opening posts and isn’t interested in re-evaluating. Chara otoh did re-evaluate her IZ read. I generally dislike emotional manipulation in general regardless of alignment so that may also be influencing me.In post 415, Raya36 wrote:
I already kind of expanded on the Titus part in my last post.In post 412, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Okay I see your point but I don’t think that necessarily makes them town either because neither of those posts are something scum couldn’t make either. I also don’t share the view that Titus has been overconfident at all. I make reads like that all the time, I think that’s protown more than anything. Can you show me where bob was being “evasive”? I find his adversarial attitude kind’ve offputting so it’s difficult for me to discern that?In post 408, Raya36 wrote:
He voted Titus then explained the reason was his overconfidence in the town reads. And then voted Bob for being evasive to my questions.In post 403, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Alright, then can you be the Red whisperer and explain to me wtf you think he’s actually saying? All I got from his ISO is one post weirdly shading Titus and another one where the referenced bob who he also apparently didn’t like and I don’t think he explained that either.In post 401, Raya36 wrote:I find red fine to read actually. Maybe our disagreement there is where the issue is. I found his posts that contained content were good. The nature of the gimmick would make it more difficult to post but I still see an effort.
This is mainly what I'm referring to when I call Bob evasive but there are other smaller instances:In post 205, Raya36 wrote:Yeah I definitely didn't know for sure if that meant you actually scumread them or not. Why do you scumread them?In post 206, wellermanbob wrote:This is always such a silly line of questioning.
Do you think they have a greater chance of being scum than other players in the game? If so, why do you need my reasons?
If no, will me writing some reasons down be a genuine way of you reevaluating? Or is just rereading them yourself enough?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I don't think his overconfidence points to him being scum. But whether he's an alt or coming from a different site will have influence on this read.In post 418, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Do you think bob is scum? I think if anyone seems overconfident in this game so far, it’s bob on his IZ scumread.In post 413, Raya36 wrote:In post 407, catboi wrote:
What about his two posts of real content was good?In post 401, Raya36 wrote:I find red fine to read actually. Maybe our disagreement there is where the issue is. I found his posts that contained content were good. The nature of the gimmick would make it more difficult to post but I still see an effort.
This is fine for an early observation/read. Titus did display confidence when stating some people were town with no reasoning behind and while I don't necessarily agree with the read, Red didn't need to start posting AI content and could have slid by with more pure gimmick without raising much suspicion.In post 75, Red wrote:Tit͞us̷'͟s ̸ey̨es ̷ẃer̵e͡ e͠g̶g̴s̨ of̷ ͏un̛s͡t̨abĺe͏ cry͝s͠t͟al҉, ́w͢h͜o̵s͟e͠ ͞n̴a͘m̕e͏ w͢a̶s͏ ̸po̴int̀i͏n͜g͞ ͏o҉ut t͝he ͏ơb͞v̸i͢o͞us̛, ͘a͢nd spo͟u̵ti̕n҉g͡ a ̨h͏um̢mi̢n̵g f͟or͡e̵s̴t̕ ͡ơf͞ ̧o҉v͜e̸rc̛oǹfide͢ņc̨e
This is also fine, although surface level. My initial impression of Bob was that he was scummy for being evasive but when scum try to be evasive they aren't so blatant. But also in this post appears to be a townlean on me as it states I was trying to solve Bob.In post 254, Red wrote:In post 206, wellermanbob wrote:This is always such a silly line of questioning.
Do you think they have a greater chance of being scum than other players in the game? If so, why do you need my reasons?
If no, will me writing some reasons down be a genuine way of you reevaluating? Or is just rereading them yourself enough?
UNVOTE:- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Because scum want a miselim. If town is already pushing in that direction then sure, that's great. But scum still want some of their own scumreads so they can push something when on of their team is under suspicion.In post 442, wellermanbob wrote:
Why?In post 440, Raya36 wrote:being trying to push at least somebody- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
That's also what I was thinking to failed to mentionIn post 444, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
I think the lack of scumreads part is NAI but that the number of townreads may be town indicative because scum doesn’t like to townread too many people.In post 440, Raya36 wrote:I don't think jj's post was bad. Wouldn't scum being trying to push at least somebody? I don't see scum pointing out townreads but failing to scumread anyone.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
But having scumreads can help them not get eliminated if momentum swings towards them. That's not close to the only thing I consider so it wouldn't make you the towniest to me.In post 459, catboi wrote:
Actually, scum don't need to do anything, simply not getting eliminated themselves is good enough. Giving the game a lack of momentum to actually get any elimination is good enough and right now there's a bunch of people who haven't really said much. But I guess I could just never vote and be the towniest town to you?In post 454, Raya36 wrote:
Because scum want a miselim. If town is already pushing in that direction then sure, that's great. But scum still want some of their own scumreads so they can push something when on of their team is under suspicion.In post 442, wellermanbob wrote:
Why?In post 440, Raya36 wrote:being trying to push at least somebody- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
This felt town. UNVOTE:In post 495, catboi wrote:going purely from memory:
mistyx - scum
titus - town
vaxkiller - scum
chara - gut town
wellermanbob - town
raya36 - townlean
somke and mirrors - gut town
red - scumlean
perfume - nothing
jjh - vague scumlean
infinity zero - townlean
twins akari and mara - actually felt like her response to my vote was kind of town?
Probably need to read back to flesh some of these out, but decided to just go off the top of my head here to start.
What makes Vax scum?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I'm against a jj elimination.In post 535, wellermanbob wrote:VOTE: jjh
If we're offering up our pet random wagons before we all have to converge later today then here is mine- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I'm not happy with the jj or twins wagon. I'd be willing to go back to cat but I don't feel as bad as I did before with this slot.
I'm not sure if this is still a viable wagon or not but I'm not liking Vax. I didn't like the Titus vote. Titus has felt town to me and it felt opportunistic as well. The unvoting for simply posting more is bad too. He next places his vote on Infinity, another slot I light townread and another opportunistic vote. Later he voted the twins as the 5th vote which is again opportunistic. He also gave no reasoning for this vote and seemingly hadn't been caught up. When he switches votes again later he says he doesn't even understand the twins wagon but he'd still be willing to go back to it? The it's Mistyx without any reasoning which again already had a wagon forming and opportunistic. He mentions how little time we have then proceeds with fluffy posts. Then joins the jj wagon, who I light townread, without any reasoning given again.
VOTE: Vax- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I'm feeling the same way about the active players. Scum is doing well at hiding right now assuming there is scum among that group.In post 611, Infinity Zero wrote:
I have quite a few townleans on active people. I think because this is a slow game, it benefits scum to post less so that they don't inadvertently get the game moving, increasing townies' motivations and generating more content with which they can be caught. Not all scum think like this, so it's kind of a weak thing, but it makes me a bit more comfortable to have less active players in my PoE.In post 603, unwnd wrote:I don't feel it's been slow, and even if you believe this how does it affect your reads? Are you comfortable with the people who have been posting more?
I also think there's a problem of like, if the scum are in the more active players, they haven't been scummy enough to get caught yet, so it's hard to tell which ones. I think arguing that a specific active player is scummy would be more helpful than just saying that limming in the lurkers is a bad idea. I think chara has been very scummy but not many people agree with me, so I'm ok just voting people who haven't towntold yet.
-Inf
My thing with Misty is that if she knows she's generally very enthusiastic as town why would scum!Misty announce that she's happy to be town only to not try to show that. The only reason I see scum!Misty announcing that at the start is to draw attention to it and prove it. Not draw attention only to do the opposite and therefore appear scummy. For that reason she reads more as initially genuinely excited to be town but maybe feeling disengaged with the game or maybe busy, who knows.In post 614, unwnd wrote:
Go with this thought? I wasn't merely offering my thoughts in a way that seemed like biting criticism. I don't disagree with your assumption made in regards of what scum could possibly be doing, and it's something I've noted. I do however think that purely at a meta level this PList again has a ton of people like (Misty) who love being town and I'd really expect a hell of a lot more. I keep exclusively mentioning her which actually kinda annoys me because I don't wanna end up compromising on someone like Misty, but I will do it and my vote is there to say 'Misty, show up and be town or just die'. I have one or two reads I'm keeping to myself for now besides that.In post 611, Infinity Zero wrote:
I have quite a few townleans on active people. I think because this is a slow game, it benefits scum to post less so that they don't inadvertently get the game moving, increasing townies' motivations and generating more content with which they can be caught. Not all scum think like this, so it's kind of a weak thing, but it makes me a bit more comfortable to have less active players in my PoE.In post 603, unwnd wrote:I don't feel it's been slow, and even if you believe this how does it affect your reads? Are you comfortable with the people who have been posting more?
I also think there's a problem of like, if the scum are in the more active players, they haven't been scummy enough to get caught yet, so it's hard to tell which ones. I think arguing that a specific active player is scummy would be more helpful than just saying that limming in the lurkers is a bad idea.I think chara has been very scummy but not many people agree with me, so I'm ok just voting people who haven't towntold yet.
-Inf
I'm very against eliminating Chara- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Do you agree with my read and points made against Vax?In post 671, unwnd wrote:OK Raya, you're my strongest townread so I'm fine with going with you
VOTE: Vax- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I don't think happy posting is a tell. I was quite active and I guess happy posting in my last game where I was scum because I enjoy playing scum. Could be the same caseIn post 675, wellermanbob wrote:
Strong preference for A&M of those 3 tbh? Though I guess I'm not allowed to be that picky but Vaxkiller early posting was happy posting so unless they love Pokémon or love playing scum its probtown.In post 672, Raya36 wrote:Willing to eliminate: Vax -> cat -> Twins as a compromise
Cat has been the voice of reason so unless my reads are way off is also probtown.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Alright, just making sure this isn't a pure sheep voteIn post 678, unwnd wrote:
I liked it, but generally speaking my thought on Vax just again amounts to 'being really fucking weird'In post 674, Raya36 wrote:
Do you agree with my read and points made against Vax?In post 671, unwnd wrote:OK Raya, you're my strongest townread so I'm fine with going with you
VOTE: Vax- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I'd really prefer not eliminating mistyx. I'm all for pressure there but now is not the time for that
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Is that based on first impressions or did you read into some meta?In post 685, wellermanbob wrote:Vaxkiller doesn't strike me as a scum loving player- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
This is an interesting observation and I think I agreeIn post 827, wellermanbob wrote:But also to read into Vax posting they seemed a bit mad to be at E-1...which is why I'm not thinking that wagon was pure
jjh927, Catboi, Raya36, unwnd, Twins Akari and Mara, Titus
jj I still think is town.
Catboi's rvs was Vax. Would scum rvs their partner? Catboi was also on and off Vax throughout the day. It didn't feel like distancing and any interactions didn't feel svs.
unwnd - town
Twins never said anything about a vax read and then were ok with voting vax and voted there towards the end. This could be a partner?
Titus pushed a little at Vax early on. Also he stated that perfume and vax can't be scum together. If Titus was scum with Vax he would likely push perfume and use that as an excuse to townread vax after making that statement. I don't see an agenda in the thought process.
VOTE: Twins
I don't think Vax was ever in an unsavable position until the very end?In post 828, Titus wrote:I agree Infinity isn't likely scum and Vax was likely hard bussed by some and that scum, at some point could have agreed there was no saving him.
I think Booneytunes is a great game to reference for meta VCA if there can be such a thing as Vax's reaction was similar here.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I definitely agree with your catboi analysis and your analysis of me was good. How was 700 a townslip though?In post 829, Infinity Zero wrote:I was gonna say that the scumflip makes me more confident that a bunch of people on that wagon were town, but 827 is a good point. I'm not sure how scum bus d1, but I don't think raya and catboi are likely scum on the wagon. Raya because she was pretty widely townread, and earlier in the day I had voted catboi with the fact that raya was on the wagon as a major reason. It doesn't make a ton of sense to bus in that situation when you can use your towncred to push a miselim without a ton of accountability. Catboi looks good because 700 is kind of a townslip. Catboi was already voting vax at the time, and I'd think scum would remember if their vote was on a scum buddy, especially at that point in the game. Both me and gamma also strongly TR S&M on play. I think the soft is +town for chara, although it's sort of an odd time for town to soft. I'll talk to gamma about who we think is scum.
-Inf - Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36