Large Normal 231 | Etymologies | Game Over
Forum rules
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Heya! Second game, first outta newbie queue, be easy.
First impressions, no looking back at posts, after one causal read-through:
BB {fake}claiming day1 is already the BB I know and love and this is literally my second game. A happy NAI from me. Enjoyed the interplay, but probably won’t read into too many of the reactions to it.
Except Mr. Ping pong paddle, I think that gleeful style might be what I want to be when I grow up. Game is hard, but should be fun.
EE stood out in my first readthrough. I’m impressed as hell that anyone could have a townlist that sized twenty pages into day1. On my re-read, I want to see how everyone else interacted with them. As it is, the high effort and some of the...reactionary responses? they offered might help me sort a little.
Gemma also stood out, maybe because of number of posts, maybe because of the “I don’t like how this day is going, I’m not able to play how I wanted” comment which I think is pretty much how I see their day. Maybe you said it and I missed it, but...how do you want to play? Is there a particular reason why BB being BB messes with that? Especially in a game of this size?
I barely remember the wagons. The new Joyed one came from nowhere as far as I could tell on a first read; I had DGR or DGB or whatever the acronym is as strange but not wagonworthy, and I’m sure there was someone else but clearly I didn’t credit that wagon enough to make note of it.
People I kinda liked on first read:
Titus, ping pong, Gamma, rainyCat, and I think Luca. I reserve the right to flip on all of these; this is one read through flash impressions.
Excited to play!- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
@chkflip I’ll get it right moving forward, unfortunately the paddle was more memorable than the name. In my defense....I like ping pong?
NPOM read is interesting, almost like your questioning them about not changing their RVS vote convinced them to...immediately change their vote. For still nearly RVS reasons.
Also all apologies to Rannygazoo. That cat is staring into my soul, and I at least got the first letter right.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Me newbie, I’d guess.
Read over the existing wagons. I like cheaky’s least, and it’s not like we really get anything out of pushing on it if they’re away till the weekend. Save it for later and more posts imo.
Don’t like the mini wagon either.
I do like DGB’s and Joyads a lot more.
Between the two, DGB pinged me more, and I like the people on that wagon more, too. Posting off phone so quoting specifics is proving to be a pain, but I’m happy to elaborate. For now, I’m jumping on board.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DrippingGoofball- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
In the time I wrote that post, Mom decided they didn’t like the DGB vote anymore. Can you explain why you voted them initially? For me, it was the joke thing about the oops my PT thread (I think I just hate those jokes), and the general admission that “well I’m always scumread so I guess I’ll have to constantly push against this”. Didn’t feel productive, not a lot of substance, I was okay with the vote. Also what changed?
Then DGB posted a thing I liked. I agree, cheeky is not the biggest lurker.
My lurkery scum read is Hayker, personally.
So I’ve decided that I’m terrible at cold reads, I think I made the wrong call, and will be voting Joyad instead.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: plusJoyed- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
@norweigianEE, how do you propose to give the game a push?
@gamma cheeky could be scummy, but not with the info I have. If you have a better read I’m happy to hear it. Otherwise, it feels better to push there in a day or two from my perspective. I’m not discrediting the suspicion, just don’t like that wagon rn.
It’s my understanding that it’s good to push productive wagons, especially this early in the day? But maybe I’m missing something. Is cheeky your most scummy read?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I think this is kind of my point, just from the other direction. It’s not what you expect from Cheeky is the part of the read I don’t have the info for. It’s not what you’d expect of town? I don’t think that’s as conclusive. If anything, the “oh don’t worry about me I’ll be back see ya” play calls a lot of unwanted attention, as your sus kinda shows. Seems easier just to...not say anything. Or throw less shade. Or do something else.In post 575, Gamma Emerald wrote:the key elements of her play seems to be shading others and useless commentary. That’s not what I expect from Cheeky nor what I expect from town. And her post announcing her leaving is a sign that she’s meeting some nebulous quota of content and then buggering off. Scum do that so they are seen as giving content but also have more wanted from them, keeping themselves just beyond the threshold of being voted by seeming useful.
Now if this is atypical of cheeky, I like the read more. I’m actually decently interested in exploring it. Just don’t see the point when they aren’t here to chime in. Sure, we get to hear from other people, but I like it when my wagons get to experience the pressure in person. Much more satisfying imo.
Maybe I’m stupid, but I liked Mini’s most recent wall of questions, and saw them as towny. Was kinda sad I didn’t get one.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Like don’t get me wrong, I understand where Luca is coming from, but
The mafia PT theory is not convincing to me whatsoever
The idea that asking a lot of questions and not giving reads is just filler seems to come up a lot, but again I wonder if scum actually does this with any frequency. Can anyone give me an example of a game where scum produces filler content? I’d love to see some examples of what this filler looks like in practice, because if this is it, again, it calls a lot of attention to itself. Wouldn’t filler content try to be more subtle?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Oh my I DID get a question after all!In post 581, MiniMegabyte wrote:What makes you think this?
I considered the game still in RVS because I had only read through the thread once, none of the wagons had really picked up any kind of steam, and frankly none of them stood out to me so much on the first read that I wanted to throw my vote on, which I knew I wanted to do. I was hoping that going back and choosing between wagons would be a smaller scope that I could try to scumhunt within, but then it all went to shit and the biggest part of my read on DGB got disproven literally while I was writing my post deciding to jump on that wagon. So clearly even that smaller scope wasn’t enough.
Plus I’m still new enough that RVS hasn’t lost its luster, it made me happy to draw a line in the sand. My whole identity as a newbie is threatened by the existence of another and it felt productive to draw the line in the sand. They did say I was towny though, so I guess I can share the role.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Genuine question, now applied to both cheeky and miniIn post 600, BBmolla wrote:you're not scumhunting you're just trying to look like you are
Is this really scummy? Like can someone give me a game or three where scum did this? It gets read as scummy, but to me it seems really bad for that exact reason.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Ah so we are still in RVS then after all. Vote first questions later got it. I’ll fall in line.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Cheeky
So now that I did the thing, can someone answer my question? Seems like a fair trade. Link me any examples where scum actually behaved like either a) “I need to take a vacation, throw shade, see you later” or b) filler content, such as asking lots of questions, “not actually scumhunting”, etc. I want to see some of it in action. My bad pet theory is that reports of such scummy behavior by actual scum are grossly overstated.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I’m with BB here, this is a reason why the cheeky wagon feels boring. cheeky isn’t even here to threaten.In post 607, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If any of these wagons so far have been on scum i doubt they’ve felt threatened.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I’ll drop it, i can feel myself getting out in the weeds, but I guess I still wonder if that kind of logic wouldn’t also hold for unmotivated town. I’m not convinced it’s AI is all.
Nah I get it, I’m okay enough with it to vote it. I didn’t read their posts as towny, just need some more evidence to back the low activity shade throwing=scum read. If Gemma says they also have a cheeky specific read on it, I’m cool with it. The waiting till cheeky is here is just a preference thing. We could conceivably have a whole different wagon come and gone by then.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Going through some isos, and just saw that I missed this.
Good to be here! Nice to have a few familiar faces.In post 519, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:Good to have you here, Quiet.
Mini wagon took off since this, plus the long set of questions they posted. Do you still maintain this read?I'm adding chkflip to my townreads with Norway and Mini.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Not anymore, you’re fired. I’m now hiring a new paralegal. Feel free to apply below.In post 660, Rannygazoo wrote:Like, bro, I’m not your paralegal
On the topic of my alleged sea-lionness (which is slander, and I’ll see you in court)
I don’t think the barrier was quite as extreme as you are making it sound. The argument I made is one that really only works on myself. If people say that this is how scum play, that they have played this way while scum, I’ll believe them. I’d still like to see an example of it, not as a barrier to a mini vote, but because I want to be able to recognize it in the future. There’s twenty people in this thread, I don’t think asking if someone could point me towards something I could use to get better (especially if it’s as wildly common as people are saying it is) is all that egregious.
Entitled, maybe, but hey I’m a lawyer now. It’s gone to my head.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
You know what, I concede the point entirely. I’m coming out of newbie setup with 9 players, where wagons build a lot faster-I’d be less happy with quicker pushes for VLA people there. In a larger game, it’s totally reasonable. These wagons need a lot of inertia to get moving.In post 655, Gamma Emerald wrote:You know, if I saw several votes on me after being away for a while, I’d feel rather pressured.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Was also going to ask this, but frankly I don’t think “normal” rules apply to either not-Not_Mafia or BBmola here, the two claimy people, who appear to have the style of I claim what I want when I want to. I’d be curious if anyone has methods they use to sort players like that.In post 698, Binatog13 wrote:Is it normal to claim in this early phase of day 1?
My understanding that negative util roles are supposed to claim ASAP; there are probably other roles that should claim ASAP, but most get more useful not claiming. Don’t know how useful rolehunting or even discussing is day1, it helps maf at least as much and often way more than town.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Perfect timing!In post 721, Momrangal wrote:Speaking of Quiet, it's taking alot to not latch onto quiet. It's really disturbing how he's so focused on the fact that he's new and fresh and green player. I feel like alot of his post amounts to IIOA
and doesn't really have much of a point but at the same time he's tryingreally hard[/I[ to engage and interact with the people around him
Hi, I’m quiet. Unfortunately, I think you’ve nailed me both as a human and def as a mafia player. Very excited, very high effort, no clue how to direct it usefully, no clue how to summarize down to analysis vs just spewing information. If anything, what I do is worse, because I ask a bunch of meta questions (so do scum actually do the low post count thing, or is that overstated?)
Not not-Mafia has told me to find a point. Now you have too. It’s good advice. It’s also challenging. This post is very much not in keeping with that goal of finding a point, but it seems relevant anyhow?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I’m on board with all of these, especially hawker.In post 728, Luca Blight wrote:Hayker. PlusJOYED. Cheeky.
These are also (I believe) the first, second, and third most lurkey slots. Do you have any reads that aren’t on lurkers? Or was that the basis of your reads?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I think the point I was trying to get to with my request for notarized examples was this. It seems like low-count (and low content) posters get scumread. I scumread them. It’s also easy to latch on to one bad post when there’s only ten of them. I have been convinced that scum play this way, but it also feels like...a really simple read to make that will often catch not-scum.
I understand the point of pushing one of those slots anyway to try to sort them, because without posting and without previous days votes or night actions we have nothing to go on. I guess I’m just trying to figure out how to tell the difference between actually busy or shy town or nervous power role and scum.
Also in my brain, if this is such an obvious scumtell, why wouldn’t scum just...not do it? I know it’s not that simple, but I think that’s the point I was trying to make.
All that being said, I still sus all three of those for exactly the same reason, so I guess I’m just a hypocrite.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
But there is a massive difference between what you just described and not posting at all. I’m lost trying to solve most of the time as town. I can apply the same shitty methodologies when I’m scum, and end up with a mix of good and bad results. I don’t know, it just feels like not posting is an answer, but especially day1, bad town reads are practically expected. I would think that lurkey activity would get worse as time goes on, and maybe people are out the gate trying to set that precedent, but doing it day1 just draws so much attention...
I’ll drop it.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Yeah this makes sense to me. Happy with my vote here right now.In post 738, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Take a look at the burst of activity from Cheeky, it was a classic scum way of dialoguing.
In a similar vein, I was trying to decide if those kind of wall catch-up posts in general (hi Luca) are in any way AI. I liked what Luca said, but also recognize that it would be an effective playstyle as scum; it kind of lets you answer questions/be responsive. Mini got sussed for practically the same posting style in a slightly different context.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Catching up on today's excitement. A wild Not_Mafia appears. I'm just going to not think about it too hard and hold to the cheeky line. See no reason to change the read there, and see no way to read Not_Mafia.
This is prob the best take i've seen on my posting. I'll review 598/try to clarify what I meant by the filler content thing if ya want, but it probably isn't all that useful.In post 903, Andresvmb wrote:A lot of quiet’s early posts seem non-committal and don’t really say much. I’m rather intrigued by the slot. Like they’re claiming to be somewhat of a newbie so give them some room, but the posts actually seem well thought out. Except for the fact that... there’s barely any fire to them.
I’ll give an example. 598 is analyzing a post by Luca that well, was harshly criticizing Mini for not really contributing anything useful. But quiet is interpreting it as a legitimate argument. It’s a strange take. And this question about whether Scum ever produce filler content? Of course they do! Everybody does. It’s not AI actually unless you start seeing a lot of filler as a means of distraction.
I like your take because it kind of highlights what I see as the biggest issue with my play right now. I can be well thought out, that is something within my ability to control. If I take my time while posting, I can do that. But being useful, directed, "fiery", having a point, some kind of purposiveness... that is a lot harder. I'm trying to keep the scope of my attention today mostly to visible wagons (mini, cheeky, plus, etc), people that stand out for some reason (the aggressive Bypasser, high-frequency-king Norwegian), or reactions/responses to me as it helps keep it manageable.
I thought Andres put a similar amount of attention and interest into the rest of their catch up posts, and generally liked the slot before today, so they're town to me. I thought the interactions between Mom and Dad I mean Andres have been interesting. I was kinda hoping someone else would chime in. I have a decent townlean on Mom, too.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I thought I said "Dad I mean Andre" as a joke, but maybe I messed it up or something. In that post dad=andre.
Also andre didn't know what to think of me and wanted me to have more fire and honestly I think that qualifies him for the position as dad.
I'm townlean on Mom because she strikes me as independently solving. Also, Mom seems generally protective, which I find interesting.
In post 936, Momrangal wrote:That's a really weird way to get me to back down on my interrogation on your pursuit of mini. I feel like they are being unfairly treated, and they are being railed on.In post 955, Momrangal wrote:The points against NM is fair though, and I'm aware of cheekys preferences and NMs disposition to games but I would hate to [elim] on policy, which is what it does kinda feel like to meIn post 744, Momrangal wrote:Lurksack nero is definitely a worry but I feel like there may be other reasons he's not wholly here I outside of alignmentSpoiler:
Momangral, do you feel like lurkey people get miselimed? Seems to be the common denominator between the first three. You are also sus of Gamma and Norwigian and a few others I don't really see pinged by anyone else (or at least not very many people). Do you like the plusJoyad wagon more than the cheeky wagon?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
and defending low-activity slots. It's like the inverse of everyone else.In post 986, Gamma Emerald wrote:she’s going after high-activity slots (me and Nor), which kinda seems counter-intuitive- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Hey this is from a long time ago, but which players do you find completely unreadable?In post 271, Luca Blight wrote:I can relate to that post tbh as there are certain players I find completely unreadable, who I hope to be resolved by PR's.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Seems just like BB to me.In post 807, DrippingGoofball wrote:I get fakeclaiming dayvig, daycop, PGO, odd-night ninja serial killer mason... but miller? It sounds like an impulsive scum move that was recanted after someone suddenly recalled that rolecops are a thing.
Other than disagreeing on that read, I've liked everything DGB has posted since just before I voted them. Liked their posts today a lot. Town to me.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I thought I liked Rainycat. I'm going to go see if I can articulate why.
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Could we do Hawker instead?In post 1060, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 1054, Luca Blight wrote:
Can we at least consolidate onto the PlusJOYED wagon to breathe some life back into this day? It feels atm like we're going through the motions and Not_Mafia's elim is inevitable.
Fair enough to me. I've got PlusJoyed/Not_Mafia/Hayker all in my PoE and could switch my vote to any if there is desire for it.
They’re here right now, and more scummy to me than plus atm.
VOTE: Hayker
I personally still feel comfortable with NM today, but that’s strictly holding the line the fact that I know I won’t be able to read NM and thought cheeky was scummy.
But I liked my nickname. PrimeFighter. It’s probably an insult that I don’t understand but it was nice anyway.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
No I miss it put it back.In post 1108, Not_Mafia wrote:quiet
Bypasser, do you disagree on Hayker? Or at least putting pressure on that slot? Or do I just generally scumping like crazy for you.
Since they’ve gone back they’ve come for NM and Norwegian in relatively low-effort ways. I scumread the slot before they got back, and am on board with (I think Andres) sentiment that I’m comfortable waiting till plus gets back before putting pressure there. Why not push here?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
This was Hayker's day. After a few posts on the BBMola situation, we get to here:
Really didn't like this read, especially in context of 100 posts after first two posts with nothing else said/done.In post 126, Hayker wrote:vote:Andres
Originally I misread Andres post a bit and was going to point out I consider it a scum tell to insist onesself is town, but Andres didn't quite do that. Even so it feels very offputting. The cockyness of " oh I wont react.
Then we move on to at this point well wagonned DGB:In post 250, Hayker wrote:In post 213, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 195, Rannygazoo wrote:
NPOM is unreadable. If any investigative role out there wants to check them tonight, don’t let me stop you.
Are you crumbing RB?
Are you role fishing?
I thought this was mostly shade throwing.In post 305, Hayker wrote:Loggint this aa a tell/slip. Specifically the last time I rolled scum. Not enough on its own though, espwcially since I see two ways to read this message. But last time I rolled scum. I once used wording like this and was called for it on another site
I liked this. This was a townping from me.
But now these two back to back:In post 498, Hayker wrote:Oddly enough the more DGB posts the less I scumread themIn post 541, Hayker wrote:I don't know how I missed this before. Probably trying to play these games with just my phone. You fake claimed miller? Was this move just for discussion purposes? This does not feel townie at all to me. Miller can cause a lot of chaos and confusion to the town, and fake claiming it at that.
Heybbmolla
BBmolla
Same bad vote for basically the same bad reasons. These are the world's easiest outs. And then goes after Norwigian when there is pushback against the timing of the NM vote. I just don't see this as trying to solve the game. I would rather push for more detail here right now.In post 1027, Hayker wrote:What on earth is this absolute garbage tier shit posting.
vote:not_mafia
Absolute rubbish. This is considered allowed play?
I can almost accept the playing on phone/playing lots of games/was busy rationale. Unfortunately that rationalle is also scummy. I want to see more to sort it. Voting is how I get that.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Don't know how to multiqoute, but Bypasser, what do you think the point of Hayker chiming in on your one-line back and forth with Norwigian was? Like why jump on that interaction?
I read the interaction like this
Bypasser: Gives reads, says didn't read full thread
Norwigian: Says reads are bad, says go read thread and be better
Bypasser: Got something useful to say?
Norwigian: Did I stutter? Calling your reads bad was useful (and/or i've been useful, what have you been doing)?
Either way, interesting back and forth.
Hayker clipped the last line "Everything is useful", and shaded it like this:
Of everything in the thread, that's what we focus on? Of everything Norwegian has posted, that's the scumping? And why are we targeting Norwegian here after being gone from the thread for a while? It seems off to me.In post 1072, Hayker wrote:I strongly dislike posts like this. "everything I said is useful" Just insisting that ones own play is good. Never a good thing to see.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Andres is someone I read as super towny due to their suspicion of Norwegian and the way they went about it. Hayker feels to me like someone who read Andre’s recent posts and decided to jump on board.
Fine sorry DGB if we want to stay on NM and end the day just say the word and I’ll move my vote back. I thought we were getting another wagon on, and want Hayker more than I want plus.
I think I’ll just spoiler all longer comments from now on and write a tldr at the end, I don’t know how to be brief or effective.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I just disagree. It’s the purpose behind them I read as scummy, and the absence from the thread otherwise. Why did Hayker spend their time on the people they did?In post 1122, DrippingGoofball wrote:All the Hayker quotes you posted lean more town than scum.
I think you just want NM gone yesterday. Which I can understand in principal, but I’m okay taking a day or two off a wagon that was almost casually hammered to get more info elsewhere.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I don’t particularly want to set up a competing wagon. Plus falls into the same (if less intense) category as Hayker and Cheeky for me, and I don’t mind voting here if that’s just better. I’m thinking back to NorfolkBoy’s comments about easy targets, though, and feel like she’s the easiest. That doesn’t mean not scummy, as someone pointed out tells are tells for a reason, but just feelsbad I guess.In post 1125, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If i could vote both Hayker and Plusjoyed at the same time i probably would.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I would like it if someone with more experience could chime in with some more data points, but I looked at a few other finished games of about this size, and it looked like 4-5 scum, 4ish town poweroles (with one or two weaker and one or two stronger, most with a few modifiers).In post 1377, Bypasser Catcher wrote:not to townslip but how many scum usually in a large
I don’t know if it is typically like this though, or if (as random examples) we are in a world with zero power roles or all power roles or three scum with superpowers, I don’t know if any of those options are considered Normal games. For my sanity, can anyone summarize about what I should expect the game state to be?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I think I really like bypasser today.
Also, is this
More of this?In post 1355, Bypasser Catcher wrote:I've thought about it for the past 20 minutes and I've decided i think im actually confident enough to locktown gamma here. Explanation on request after gamma responds to me.
Personally, Gamma kind of scares me, but in the intense way of like, not wanting to disappoint a teacher. That is not AI, the only thing I’ve noted there is they seem to be targeting the high frequency posters vs. most others searching in the low frequency. I’m slightly towny on them, but if you have a stronger sort I’d like to hear it.In post 1391, Bypasser Catcher wrote:I was half bluffing the statement tbqh. When I enter a game I pretend to make strong reads that I myself am not actually confident in because strong reads generate strong reactions which lead to stronger reads.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
So I went and tried to do this. Joyed has a lot of games, generally posts a fair amount as either alignment.In post 1401, Luca Blight wrote:Compare their meta and get back to me.
Mini 2167 he was mafia, and posted frequently, responsively, etc. while Joyed is not playing like they normally do, it’s clear they don’t have to rely on newbscum tactics like avoid the thread. Am I missing something in their meta that makes you like voting joyed more?
I guess I’m not seeing how meta necessarily supports Joyed over hawker. I understand not being super impressed with the catch up though.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
This please. Also just a taste of some content would be really nice. Throw a bone to the town puppy here.In post 1411, Bypasser Catcher wrote:why?
can you explain why the lack of post content from you by the way?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Yeah I’ll wait to respond to the real Bypasser, but quick thoughts:
I figured DGB would be a controversial read. I can do a dive to justify if you want.
Don’t know why locktown andres is all that controversial. I’d be curious why that pinged
Nero is one of my least confident reads, but I liked them better than the people in null. It was the last I put on the list.
Vax and Mom, I think the pings are probably fair.
Strong disagree with you that Bino is obvtown, which is a take I think you gave in reference to their NotMafia response.. They have two games, one scum, one mason, and both post exactly like this. I think them saying “I think NotMafia put me on top of the readlist to try to shade me by association” is just...Binatog.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I don’t think my stated reasons why I put Vax or Mom where I did were super clear or effective. I think it’s fair for him to not like them.In post 1426, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
I can try. Going to spoiler again, as this doesn't feel that productive/as organized as I'd like.
Here's more thoughts on why I put mom where I did
Spoiler:
I can do the same thing for Vax, but I find myself agreeing with Rannygazoo. Huh. I liked a rainycat post. I don't know how useful my reads are anyway, just wanted to put them out there. Probably why I spoilered them.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Me too, and I was not emotionally prepared.In post 1449, Rannygazoo wrote:Ok, I thought you were about to tear into it
I'm going to go hide I mean work for a bit. Someone ping me if they need me.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
because I'm literally insecure about it being important content.In post 1452, Bypasser Catcher wrote:supposedly important content?
I am absolutely sure that very few people care about my justifying my day1 read on Mom. if they do, they can click the button and read it.
I'm trying to post less walls of useless info. It's day1, and I'm struggling to find useful info in a 20 person game that hasn't already been discussed to death. It feels like we're almost in a holding pattern at this point, waiting for a flip, night kills, and night actions for more info.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
This.In post 1638, chkflip wrote:but why Nero over either leading wagon?
I'll VOTE: Nero Cain, as what has been said by Gamma, Norwigian, Mom is compelling enough to me. I think I put less weight in noticing the NM claim being scummy, and more weight in the unNero-like response.
But is Nero a viable wagon at this point in the day?
Otherwise, can we consolidate onto Hayker (or NM, or whoever else) and move forward?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
To clarify, by unNero-like response, I mean how they seem "disinterested", how this playstyle is not similar to how they were town in other games, how Gamma noted their return was phrased in a way they wouldn't expect of town, the presupposition of scum!Mom as a reason to defend, etc. Those pings were more compelling to me than the idea that they knew about what I thought was a fairly visible, loudly discussed, very possibly trolly claim by a very...attention grabbing player?
Long day, being even less clear than normal. Sorry.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
NM is clearly viable, they went to E-1In post 1647, Momrangal wrote:Why couldn't Nero cain be a viable wagon?
What makes Hayker or NM more viable?
Hayker is clearly viable, they went to E-5 or E-4 I believe.
We’re at E-7 with you included on Nero?
It was a genuine question. Maybe there are seven Nero votes floating around. If Nero is viable, then they’re viable, and I’m happy to sit here.
Plus am I expected to expect you to vote Nero? I thought you wanted some non meta reasons first.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
huh I guess the nero wagon was viable after all.
I may have had very light reasons to vote Nero when I jumped on the wagon from Hayker, but I am exceptionally happy to be on this wagon right now. My vote stays. Don't buy the claim whatsoever. The only progression I saw was anger at everyone voting them -> depression self vote -> no point in bargaining -> acceptance of their fate. But also I know for a fact I don't like playing with angry players, and that might be coloring my read. I didn't have the time I wanted to read over old games, but I'm satisfied enough with what has been said.
Plus I'm with Norfolk, and a few others. This sure as hell seems to provide a lot more info than Hayker's elim.
Also the gamestate seemed to change pretty seriously since I last posted. Today was some early susses, then an almost casual hammer on NM, a slow moving, stalled out wagon on Hayker, then whatever the hell the last 20something pages have been of fighting over Nero's slot. Three very different wagons.
Does anyone have a take on why the game slowed down when Hayker was up? Is it just because it wasn't a very exciting elim?- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
Is it worth outing a PR to catch scum? Is there a guarantee that there is only one Tracker PR? Cause if we can use this to sort NM sooner than waiting for that weak every other night BS, I'm all for it.In post 2132, Andresvmb wrote:I mean Nero this is a mistake yeah? You should have outted and condemned Not_Mafia to an execution.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
What Bypasser said makes sense to me. I could understand not claiming then, operating under the assumption that NM would get elimmed pretty inevitably in a day or two if they had faked the claim (and i'm like, 85% sure that is the world we are living in), but putting pressure back on NM or someone else makes more sense that what actually went down.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
This was not my read whatsoever. I read them as either distancing, or trying to claim that NM had faked the tracker claim, that he was the real tracker all along.In post 2182, Andresvmb wrote:Here’s my issue with your logic here. You are quite certain that Not_Mafia is Scum and making a false Role claim correct? So why are you happy about your Nero vote again? Nero is so sure Not_Mafia is Scum, they fakeclaimed Not_Mafia’s role in frustration. So clearly they’re not aligned as Scum.
Or are you saying this is VT fakeclaiming a PR???
I elim that anyway.- quiet
-
quiet Goon
- quiet
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 698
- Joined: December 12, 2020
pedit (I think that's how that phrase works) fair point on the distancing thing. My original impression was this is just a fake pr claim to try and survive, and that's still the vibe I get, but if someone is telling me that VT FAKE FRUSTRATION CLAIMS are a thing, then, shit, I guess that's a thing. I wanted to understand if a real PR would actually come out earlier for the notMafia fake/real/whatever claim. I saw the distancing thing in Bypasser's post and was like, mm, yeah, I guess that could also make sense, it's a reasonable reason for it to happen. - quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet
- quiet