Newbie 2051: Iceland! - End!
Forum rules
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Seconded, we salute you
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
[1]
Found this sus to even insinuate it is somewhat serious a vote this early on with such little discussion, unless ofc this is to obtain a reaction and read responses.In post 40, floo wrote:VOTE: flow trap
This is at least a partially serious vote. Don't want to discuss why right now.
[2]
So what you're saying is if you are playing well and have lots of reads and ideas we should scum read you ahaIn post 45, Enchant wrote:
It's easy to explain.In post 44, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 38, Enchant wrote:Yeeaaah.
So i'm not good at game, where main source of info is people yelling on each other.Dude, you won Newbie 2046 by fooling the town perfectly! If you are not good, don't know who can be!!
I was Mafia and i didn't need info at all, just lie and pretend like i search for info. In Newbie 2048 i failed as Town Jailkeeper. We won though, but that's not because me certanly.
Pretenting easier than doing actually.
[3]
I rate this. lolhammers are all too painful.In post 69, Enchant wrote:New meta to counter Not_Mafia players.
Count like he is on E-1 but actually that's E-2.
[4]
Universal commentIn post 77, floo wrote:
"..." not part of original post.In post 46, safebet222 wrote: So how can you have a serious vote of 3 people haven't even checked in?
...
OMGUS?
With the game becoming more serious, I can explain my motives. I switched my RVS vote from Enchant to flow trap because I wanted to see where a conversation would go. flow trap's posting style is lighthearted with a lot of small talk and interactions with other player, as one of the most active users so far (might be the most active in terms of post count). I stated my vote was "partially serious" (40) to avoid seeming suspicious from an apparent OMGUS (as you guessed) and a second (apparently) random vote. I am explaining my intentions now because I would rather have flow trap discuss his/her gameplay or opinions than post joke reactions.
I have always been cautious of connecting "being active" aka posting a lot, to providing surface readings of townie behaviour, it could be LAMIST behaviour or just benign comments that don't particularly contribute to driving the conversation on.
[5]
Found this somewhat sus that Eso rational behind the voting pressure applied, I read this reaction as scum worrying about their scum teammate being waggoned and not knowing how to stop it (especially when accompanied with #87 & #88). Or at the very least scum trying to act townie and get town points for defending someone under early pressure.In post 83, esotericzoomer wrote:
but what are you starting fromIn post 82, Enchant wrote:We should start from something.
people just randomly tacked on votes to them without a sliver of explanation or progression so i'm completely lost
[6]
For someone who I have overall townie vibes from I didn't like this L-1 too much (at least the way it was done), I can see the rational behind the level of pressure here to try and risk danger in the aim to obtain results, even if it meant someone hammered because if you put someone to L-1 thats what you have to be prepared to have happen.In post 86, safebet222 wrote:
Eh... I didn't see his name on the player list...In post 79, Enchant wrote:
And he lolhammers.In post 73, safebet222 wrote:Not_Mafia is a person who plays on this site..
I don't want this scenario to repeat.
VOTE: flow trap
That's E-1. My theory is nobody's dumb enough to hammer.
But then to remove his vote only 18minutes later seemingly because of being voted by Fredrick, hmmm.
[7]
Disagree, there is a lot you can learn by putting someone to L-1 , for example who tries heavily to defend themIn post 102, esotericzoomer wrote:
What are you gonna do, risk having potential harmful effects on town and make yourself look like a wolf?In post 101, safebet222 wrote:So what were you going to do? Twiddle your thumbs until sxum raise their hand and say, "Its me!"
There's plenty of different ways to reaction test, putting someone on e-1 doesn't achieve anything.
[8]
Agreed.In post 113, safebet222 wrote:What did you think of EZ's reaction? It seemed a bit forced and exaggerated.
[9]
I disagree with slipping in sandwiched between votes, I had intended with my vote to give the pressure to create the conversation that ultimately ended up being created by your vote, I had not imagined we would go to L-1 so soon after, I did not think there would be enough pressure with only 2 votes on to incite the conversation I wanted, I thought putting it at L-2 would suffice.In post 129, safebet222 wrote:So right now, for me, FoS is pointing at EZ and Spartan.
EZ for an unnatural response to my flow vote and Spartan for voting there when he did. Easy to slip by sandwiched between votes on a flash wagon.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Very scummy vote imo, has been lurking around and posting but still yet to provide any sort of detailed reads of their own as if they are unable to because they know everyone is town. Here voting off the back of other peoples reads without providing any sort of breakdown as to why they actually think they are sus or bringing anything new to the table.
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Hammer is always done with a previous post of an intent to hammer giving the player time to claim their role or any other players to withdraw their vote if desired.In post 214, Enchant wrote:hammer intended by most, and this is collective decision.
lolhammer is just because voter wanted to.
Lolhammer is done out of the blue with no prior warning and is typically either done by newb town or scum.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I feel like there is 1 scum between Flow trap Vs Sal.
I don't see it as Scum Vs Scum, and it just doesn't feel like Town Vs Town to me.
Other than that my main scum reads are EZ who I feel is being disingenuous in relation to that early waggon and has felt fake in some of their posts, and Fredrick who has been lurking and still yet to provide any meaningful content, could be typical scum trying to stay under the radar while still seeming active.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I didn't like it as I stated in point 6 in my #136, but he is a townie read for me at the moment.In post 252, flow trap wrote:
I was talking about "Other than esotericzoomer and me, who gave negative attention to safebet222 for his E-1 vote on you?"In post 250, Salsabil Faria wrote:it's not a loaded question, you actually did this: townread those who voted you, stated suspicions/voted who didn't like the E-1 vote on you- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
So are you trying to say you think Flow is scum, or do you disagree with what I have said here?In post 259, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 254, Spartan117 wrote:I feel like there is 1 scum between Flow trap Vs Sal.
I don't see it as Scum Vs Scum, and it just doesn't feel like Town Vs Town to me.I'm town for sure.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
So you're not willing to say at this time if you think Flow trap is town or scum?In post 264, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 263, Spartan117 wrote:
So are you trying to say you think Flow is scum, or do you disagree with what I have said here?In post 259, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 254, Spartan117 wrote:I feel like there is 1 scum between Flow trap Vs Sal.
I don't see it as Scum Vs Scum, and it just doesn't feel like Town Vs Town to me.I'm town for sure.No, I'm not trying to say thatflow trapis scum. I only know my alignment and it's town. So scum/scum is not possible. It can be either scum/town or town/town.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
1 vote wagons aren't very hot, L-2 and L-1 wagons are where the fires at
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
How does putting a vote on Enchant put pressure on someone else?In post 271, flow trap wrote:
At least not for youIn post 269, flow trap wrote:
I didn't say it was for pressureIn post 267, Enchant wrote:Thanks, it's cold here.
Really, if you annonce "THIS VOTE IS FOR PRESSURE" then i know this vote is for pressure and theorically give you nothing, so maybe you give something?- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
If you're going to be evasive, people are just going to scum read you inc myselfIn post 273, flow trap wrote:
How indeedIn post 272, Spartan117 wrote:How does putting a vote on Enchant put pressure on someone else?- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I've just asked you a question that was all.In post 277, flow trap wrote:
As I've said if you expect town (more specifically me) to abide by "truth, the whole truth, & nothing but the truth" your gonna have a bad timeIn post 274, Spartan117 wrote:
If you're going to be evasive, people are just going to scum read you inc myselfIn post 273, flow trap wrote:
How indeedIn post 272, Spartan117 wrote:How does putting a vote on Enchant put pressure on someone else?- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Even if you are town, this just hurts townIn post 285, flow trap wrote:
I don't need to answer itIn post 283, Spartan117 wrote:I've just asked you a question that was all.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Would you agree that there are different kinds of emotions, that there is a difference between reactions now after the fact and reactions at the time when there is more pressure and reactions are more honest.In post 294, flow trap wrote:Well, wearestill talking about it so it definitely got reactions out of almost everyone- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
You don't agree that reactions are more honest at the time when a situation is more pressurised like when you was put on L-1?In post 299, flow trap wrote:
Yes, yes, noIn post 297, Spartan117 wrote:
Would you agree that there are different kinds of emotions, that there is a difference between reactions now after the fact and reactions at the time when there is more pressure and reactions are more honest.In post 294, flow trap wrote:Well, wearestill talking about it so it definitely got reactions out of almost everyone- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Its to get your post count up, something decided it wasn't high enoughIn post 306, flow trap wrote:What is with the sudden double post glitch?- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
In post 311, Prism wrote:
Can you be more specific as to what makes this feel like not town v. town to you? I don't like flow individually but that conversation as a whole seems plausibly TvT to me. It also looks like you don't have a specific one in mind, as neither are your top scumreads.In post 254, Spartan117 wrote:I feel like there is 1 scum between Flow trap Vs Sal.
I don't see it as Scum Vs Scum, and it just doesn't feel like Town Vs Town to me.
Other than that my main scum reads are EZ who I feel is being disingenuous in relation to that early waggon and has felt fake in some of their posts, and Fredrick who has been lurking and still yet to provide any meaningful content, could be typical scum trying to stay under the radar while still seeming active.
Sal posts #202 asks Flow a questionIn post 202, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 142, flow trap wrote:Can we place votes here even if it's on a MoO it's still helpfulVote where? And what is MoO?
Flows next post is #218 voting Sal with the reasoning they are passive and fluffy, not answering their question at all.
I liked Sals #224, gave good detail explained their thoughts reads very townie.In post 224, Salsabil Faria wrote:Like everything... your wagon was on E-1, but didn't get any response from you. You townread those people who voted you, and placed suspicions on those who didn't like the E-1 vote on you. And you already read people while being on page 4 only, like super fast! You also stated you're not a new player, so as an experienced one you should know that being super active/helpful doesn't necessarily indicate town, as well as being silent doesn't necessarily indicate scum. Generally, activity is the last resort to point someone as town/scum. A new player can read people at this early state base on the activeness but not an experienced player. Your suspicion onesotericzoomerfor this reason doesn't make sense to me, also your vote onFredrick A Campbelland the explanation after, also feel weird to me.
Flows #227 is illusive much like their style seems to be, I get holding back information but it seems to be like getting blood out of a stone on the detail on their reads.In post 227, flow trap wrote:
Yeah, I don't respond to things like that as town or mafia. As I've stated it's easier to read people who interact with you, and I was also weary of a pocket attempt how they read me barely affects thing. Yeah, I try to read people early, I just said I was leaning that way. Being fluffy & passive isn't being silent, so idk what you mean. i no longer suspect EZ, I will elaborate later. And if you never played with me before the last thing would feel weirdIn post 224, Salsabil Faria wrote:Like everything... your wagon was on E-1, but didn't get any response from you. You townread those people who voted you, and placed suspicions on those who didn't like the E-1 vote on you. And you already read people while being on page 4 only, like super fast! You also stated you're not a new player, so as an experienced one you should know that being super active/helpful doesn't necessarily indicate town, as well as being silent doesn't necessarily indicate scum. Generally, activity is the last resort to point someone as town/scum. A new player can read people at this early state base on the activeness but not an experienced player. Your suspicion onesotericzoomerfor this reason doesn't make sense to me, also your vote onFredrick A Campbelland the explanation after, also feel weird to me.
It seems as soon as Flow is done with talking to Sal he changes his vote to enchant, so neither seeming to be a vote of true sus but perhaps more to just ensure he has their attention maybe while he attempts to do his form of scum hunting.
Out of the two of them I would most likely lean more town with Sal and more scum with Flow.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I view 211 and 212 as a collective, I'm not sure why they needed to be on separate posts.In post 357, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
What's your opinion on post 211, which comes prior to post 212?In post 215, Spartan117 wrote:Very scummy vote imo, has been lurking around and posting but still yet to provide any sort of detailed reads of their own as if they are unable to because they know everyone is town. Here voting off the back of other peoples reads without providing any sort of breakdown as to why they actually think they are sus or bringing anything new to the table.
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
There is a difference between them two words, although you have been showing a lack of general respect to your fellow players in how you respond to them.In post 427, flow trap wrote:Anyways there's a difference between arrogance & Apathy
I'm not sure how having a lack of interest or motivation coincides with someone with your post count.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Why would town need to be defensive?In post 431, flow trap wrote:Consider it a defense mechanism- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Shouldn't town risk being aggressive enough to be seen as scum in order to try and obtain results?
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
You stated that you think "Town should always be defensive"
I don't feel you can be effectively both offensive and defensive at the same time, so as to be offensive as a town scum hunting you have to risk being aggressive and as such risk giving off scum vibes in order to try and out the actual scum. Where as scum will try and play more in the mindset of just being good town and play less risky as they have much more to lose. Scum losing 1 player vs town losing 1 player has a stark difference in how hard it is for their team to still win, so town can risk being more aggressive. Albeit it is also possible for scum to try and double bluff and play aggressive to appear as town risking scummy aggression.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I don't like how you are more concerned with voting with the pack and joining a train rather than following your scummiest scum read, that stinks of scum wanting to hide amongst town.In post 511, esotericzoomer wrote:
Because people are more content voting fredrick than they are you.In post 471, Enchant wrote:Hey, i won mafiatest, and got -11, while he got -5.
Why you not pushing me, but instead change mind soo easy.
It bothers me on your disregard for who your voting, rather than having some more pinpoint accuracy on how scummy your read is, instead youre happier to vote off anyone who you may have a scum lean on rather than a more solid read on.In post 516, esotericzoomer wrote:
Fredrick is still a scumlean, it matters not to me who I vote as long as they are below the null bracketIn post 515, Enchant wrote:
Aren't you supposed to argue with that, not just agree to execute person, who you find as less likely a mafia?In post 511, esotericzoomer wrote:
Because people are more content voting fredrick than they are you.In post 471, Enchant wrote:Hey, i won mafiatest, and got -11, while he got -5.
Why you not pushing me, but instead change mind soo easy.
EZ seems much more interested in being town read than actually going after his stronger scum reads and pushing them further.In post 446, esotericzoomer wrote:i would like to ask for towncred- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I don't like how you are more concerned with voting with the pack and joining a train rather than following your scummiest scum read, that stinks of scum wanting to hide amongst town.In post 511, esotericzoomer wrote:
Because people are more content voting fredrick than they are you.In post 471, Enchant wrote:Hey, i won mafiatest, and got -11, while he got -5.
Why you not pushing me, but instead change mind soo easy.
It bothers me on your disregard for who your voting, rather than having some more pinpoint accuracy on how scummy your read is, instead youre happier to vote off anyone who you may have a scum lean on rather than a more solid read on.In post 516, esotericzoomer wrote:
Fredrick is still a scumlean, it matters not to me who I vote as long as they are below the null bracketIn post 515, Enchant wrote:
Aren't you supposed to argue with that, not just agree to execute person, who you find as less likely a mafia?In post 511, esotericzoomer wrote:
Because people are more content voting fredrick than they are you.In post 471, Enchant wrote:Hey, i won mafiatest, and got -11, while he got -5.
Why you not pushing me, but instead change mind soo easy.
EZ seems much more interested in being town read than actually going after his stronger scum reads and pushing them further.In post 446, esotericzoomer wrote:i would like to ask for towncred- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Posting a wall of reads is not the same thing as pushing scum reads, how are you pushing for answers when you just share your opinion rather than questioning them and holding them to account?In post 535, esotericzoomer wrote:
I'm pushing my scumread's, you can see this in the fact that I made a half a page long wall on my reads in general.In post 533, Spartan117 wrote:
I don't like how you are more concerned with voting with the pack and joining a train rather than following your scummiest scum read, that stinks of scum wanting to hide amongst town.In post 511, esotericzoomer wrote:
Because people are more content voting fredrick than they are you.In post 471, Enchant wrote:Hey, i won mafiatest, and got -11, while he got -5.
Why you not pushing me, but instead change mind soo easy.
It bothers me on your disregard for who your voting, rather than having some more pinpoint accuracy on how scummy your read is, instead youre happier to vote off anyone who you may have a scum lean on rather than a more solid read on.In post 516, esotericzoomer wrote:
Fredrick is still a scumlean, it matters not to me who I vote as long as they are below the null bracketIn post 515, Enchant wrote:
Aren't you supposed to argue with that, not just agree to execute person, who you find as less likely a mafia?In post 511, esotericzoomer wrote:
Because people are more content voting fredrick than they are you.In post 471, Enchant wrote:Hey, i won mafiatest, and got -11, while he got -5.
Why you not pushing me, but instead change mind soo easy.
EZ seems much more interested in being town read than actually going after his stronger scum reads and pushing them further.In post 446, esotericzoomer wrote:i would like to ask for towncred
I don't see the problem with settling for a Fredrick wagon, when like, one other person, will follow me on the Enchant wagon.
Also I thought it was obvious but the last post is a joke lol.
I'm not warping anything, you chose to vote someone based off there being traction for other people to vote them, not from them being your main scum read, which is major sus.
As much as it may have been a joke it still expresses your desire to be receiving town cred for posting your reads, which is something scum would be much more desperate for than town.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
How does sayingIn post 536, esotericzoomer wrote:You're disregarding any semblance of natural progression I had and rather you're cherrypicking my post's and warping them to fit your narrative.
Case and point,I make a joke, you read it as me wanting to be townread instead of me pushing my reads.i would like to ask for towncredin #446 push your reads?- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
In post 542, esotericzoomer wrote:
It doesn’t, it was a joke, and you cherrypicked it as well.In post 539, Spartan117 wrote:
How does sayingIn post 536, esotericzoomer wrote:You're disregarding any semblance of natural progression I had and rather you're cherrypicking my post's and warping them to fit your narrative.
Case and point,I make a joke, you read it as me wanting to be townread instead of me pushing my reads.i would like to ask for towncredin #446 push your reads?
So you agree what you said in #536 was incorrect as you literally just stated that it is you pushing your townreads...- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
It's not meaningless, the meaningful part is why your jumping on it, we are not at a stage where we will be finishing this game day just yet so ensuring a day kill is one of your scum reads isnt clinical right now as no one is near it. Your basis around joining the wagon appears to centre based off other people being sus of them too, thats why I'm scum reading you, I don't see it as simple as just voting a scumtell, it looks very blatant to me why your voting him as its easy to seem town to just vote a less scum read when you can hide under the pushes of other players, especially against a player who has been around less and more likely not to push you back or give you much for the vote you placed. It's not the vote, its the why and how.In post 541, esotericzoomer wrote:
You’re reading so far into it, it’s astounding.In post 537, Spartan117 wrote:
Posting a wall of reads is not the same thing as pushing scum reads, how are you pushing for answers when you just share your opinion rather than questioning them and holding them to account?In post 535, esotericzoomer wrote:
I'm pushing my scumread's, you can see this in the fact that I made a half a page long wall on my reads in general.In post 533, Spartan117 wrote:
I don't like how you are more concerned with voting with the pack and joining a train rather than following your scummiest scum read, that stinks of scum wanting to hide amongst town.In post 511, esotericzoomer wrote:
Because people are more content voting fredrick than they are you.In post 471, Enchant wrote:Hey, i won mafiatest, and got -11, while he got -5.
Why you not pushing me, but instead change mind soo easy.
It bothers me on your disregard for who your voting, rather than having some more pinpoint accuracy on how scummy your read is, instead youre happier to vote off anyone who you may have a scum lean on rather than a more solid read on.In post 516, esotericzoomer wrote:
Fredrick is still a scumlean, it matters not to me who I vote as long as they are below the null bracketIn post 515, Enchant wrote:
Aren't you supposed to argue with that, not just agree to execute person, who you find as less likely a mafia?In post 511, esotericzoomer wrote:
Because people are more content voting fredrick than they are you.In post 471, Enchant wrote:Hey, i won mafiatest, and got -11, while he got -5.
Why you not pushing me, but instead change mind soo easy.
EZ seems much more interested in being town read than actually going after his stronger scum reads and pushing them further.In post 446, esotericzoomer wrote:i would like to ask for towncred
I don't see the problem with settling for a Fredrick wagon, when like, one other person, will follow me on the Enchant wagon.
Also I thought it was obvious but the last post is a joke lol.
I'm not warping anything, you chose to vote someone based off there being traction for other people to vote them, not from them being your main scum read, which is major sus.
As much as it may have been a joke it still expresses your desire to be receiving town cred for posting your reads, which is something scum would be much more desperate for than town.
I’m voting a scumread, whether or not it’s my main one is completely meaningless.
And the ball is in their court to refute what I have already said, continuous pushing and questioning is a waste of time, you can even see me talking to Enchant about him not refuting any of my points.
Also the page after the joke that you want to push as a scumtell, I clarified it was a joke.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
fyi I'm not paying attention to you as whatever alignment you are, you are anti town...In post 545, flow trap wrote:
No, he said you didIn post 543, Spartan117 wrote:So you agree what you said in #536 was incorrect as you literally just stated that it is you pushing your townreads...- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
What does the last sentence of your #536 say?In post 548, esotericzoomer wrote:
I didn’t say that lol?In post 543, Spartan117 wrote:In post 542, esotericzoomer wrote:
It doesn’t, it was a joke, and you cherrypicked it as well.In post 539, Spartan117 wrote:
How does sayingIn post 536, esotericzoomer wrote:You're disregarding any semblance of natural progression I had and rather you're cherrypicking my post's and warping them to fit your narrative.
Case and point,I make a joke, you read it as me wanting to be townread instead of me pushing my reads.i would like to ask for towncredin #446 push your reads?
So you agree what you said in #536 was incorrect as you literally just stated that it is you pushing your townreads...- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Fair enough on not quoting.In post 550, esotericzoomer wrote:Not quoting that cus huge ass post but that makes literally no sense. I’m hiding behind other people’s pushes? the fuck? I’ve made it very clear that I scumread Enchant so I don’t see how I’m ‘hiding,’ also where’s my motivation as scum to not push him? However as town I see literally no one other than maybe Salsabil scumreading them as well. It would be anti-town of me to waste time on a wagon that the whole town doesn’t want to vote when there’s already a wagon forming on one of my other scumreads.
The "Hiding" is in reference to how you jumped on Fredricks wagon, I can just see how its much easier for ScumEZ to slip onto Fredricks wagon that others are pushing, than to keep pushing your strongest scum read I believe is "Enchant" and try and get more information from them while other people who are already pushing Fredrick continue to do so, do you see where I am coming from?
Also the game does not end Day 1 so any information on reads etc we get day 1 can help day 2 whether we are alive or not, it is a pro town play to keep getting information so long as we can. Hypothetical situation here: Enchant is scum, TownFredrick gets voted off, and you TownEZ gets night killed, and then ScumEnchant blends in as they weren't pushed as much day 1 and there are less people sus of him. Every read counts even if its something early day 1 that can help us sort players day 3 or however far down the line.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Can you explain your read of me compared to Enchant, why am I the better vote? Why do you think I am scum?In post 598, Prism wrote:Don't have time to really read today, prefer the Spartan vote to Enchant one. I'm probably not going to get more out of Frederick, safebet was top scumread but will wait on replacement. Might swap vote tomorrow, might keep it.
Why was Safebet your top scumread? Personally I he is a townread of mine I'm going to have to re-evaluate once he is replaced.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Could you explain your scumreads and why they are your scrum reads?In post 600, flow trap wrote:Ok, my TRs at this time are Prism & Floo- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Currently doing a read through, going to put my thoughts for each player with my read on them as I progress through the posts, and I'll note any posts of interest, again if anyone has any questions on anything I have put here or any questions about the game in general please ask. (note: I'm gonna post this now before anything else happens and the days ends and the thread gets locked I have read through it all but wish to spend more time evaluating the last 3-5 pages again properly, and also its nearly 3am and I need to get to sleep aha my head feels fried, I will be around for any general catch up/conversation for a little bit but will answer any detailed questions tomorrow if possible)
Salsabil Faria
I find it tough to narrow down Sals motives, they are very conversational and talkative to everyone coming across very townie and friendly but could also be LAMIST, has expressed townie feelings of getting burned before and scared to let themselves be taken in like this again.
I liked 531 from Sal on their breakdown of Fredrick. General townie vibes from Sal overall.
flow trap
I have a null read on this slot, its hard to pinpoint if they are town or scum, they started off the game appearing very newbish as if they didnt know what they were doing, example 53
I agree with their logic/read of safebet in 244
273 277 285 one of several examples where they have avoided the question and just played it off as if it was nothing, very illusive and evasive.
368 you state you're finding Enchant town here, what changed for you to vote him and if I've missed the post where you have made this clear please inform me.
I do agree with Flow Traps 414 it did come across from Sal on the defensive that they are more worried about being scum read and a victim than pushing back, but overall they have been very townie so this doesn't on its own change my read on their slot.
I didn't agree with 433 stating that town should be defensive, which I countered in my 434 and 436
Enchant
I town read this slot, while they may come across illusive and emotive, 45 is a prime example why I am leaning town with this slot, I feel if they are scum they would be more involved and have more ideas, while as town I get the impression from their initial admission they struggle to have motivation and form reads coming from a town perspective.
I like 58 trying to apply early pressure to someone who appeared new and inexperienced, also to potentially see who else might join and why. Starting off that first wagon that brought so much discussion. 67 warning players not to put to L-1 early because of risk of early hammer.
150 questioning Floo questioning his worry about looking sus, enchant looking town here for me.
195 another example of sure NAI content from Enchant but informative to town which he didnt need to do, in my opinion comes across townie as the message is to the best of towns interests.
I will say I find it odd how in 471 Enchant asks EZ why he is not voting him as his top scum read but then since he has voted him and applied pressure he hasnt really been able to push back
floo
Floo's posts are few but tend to be emotive and full of thought, 124 pushing flow trap to get his read on safebet when he previously explained 2/3 of his reads is good to see very townie pushing for reads.
It's hard to find a lot about Floo but from what I have seen from reading everything through chronologically they seem to provide some straight forward towny input when they do contribute will keep an eye on this slot.
quiet/safebet222 slot
27 Looks like town trying to push conversation/get the game going.
86 the original L-1 vote, I can see why it may seem scummy to put someone to L-1 so early with a chance anyone could come along and hammer but I felt it was such a bold play that scum wouldn't make with it drawing so much attention to themselves.
129 after the discussion on the early L-1 dies down he shares his early suspicions he now has trying to push for more conversation and provoke discussion.
esotericzoomer
liked 66 81 83 questioning the rationale behind the early votes, but wasn't keen on 68 and the following posts which argued against the reason for early pressure to create discussion, showed very early worry on a wagon placed on someone who he shouldn't have had enough time to invest strong town views in, early thoughts of a partnership here worried me.
87 88 seem forced and fake or genuine worry for their teammate being put to L-1 so early, it was clear that the idea behind this action was to drive discussion and put pressure on players to discuss motives although EZ really does not like Safebet doing that here in this way.
I did like their reaction to my focused push on them, gave a competent push back and reasoning but I'm still sus of this slot.
Prism
I don't like their push of safebet in 293 here, looks good from the outside but in essence just re-visiting the same points that have already been addressed.
I disagree with 303 I think sticking hard to their story is something either town or scum would do
I liked 311 challenging me on the reasoning behind my statement felt townie to chase me up on that, trying to get more info.
328 tells me they are quite experienced and appears to be looking to help town solve the problem rather than covering a sheet over our eyes, but I am going to wait and see what they do to try and figure out which side they are on. I want to see more from them as I feel there is not enough self motivated individual thoughts for me to put a concrete read on them yet.
I like their 422 it felt like a very raw emotive reaction to Flow traps actions from a townie frustration perspective at someone who was hiding information preventing others from understanding their actions/reads etc.
I don't like 475 pressuring Safebet, they dont like safebets read post from 459 and states the thinking doesnt add up but doesnt expand any further on it only questioning the vote on flow trap.
Fredrick
comes in with 90 their random vote on safebet seeming potentially a little opportunistic to jump on early to a potential reverse wagon that didn't formulate.
166 strange reaction to being voted, lack of desire to input thoughts and fight for reads, very reserved and not very townie.
173 again refusal to providing meaningful content with a mindset of "I don't have to" very much keeping their cards close to their chest, making it hard to get a well rounded read on them.
185 states that he is expressing his opinion on something but provides a pretty nothing statement that contradicts itself.
211 212 jumps on the back of Sals reasoning without providing any fresh ideas of their own to vote Floo, seems like a very scummy vote to me. something I called out in 215 which I don't believe was ever properly answered by them.
I don't like Fredricks aloofness and lack of pushing for reads, he has appeared to me very opportunistic, as for someone who should be one of the far more experienced members of this group as an SE and isn't pushing conversation or contributing to uncovering scum, if anything it feels like he is scum hiding in plain sight.
VOTE: Fredrick A Campbell- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Just finished work, going to have dinner then do a proper read through with a clean head of the last 6 pages as I wasn't able to do it all properly last night.In post 800, quiet wrote:Last post for a bit sorry for all the spam.
Spartan vs EZ is now the most interesting thing in this thread for me. Reading further, my first impression is town v town, but I want to revisit this and see if there’s anything to pick up. I’m walking back my immediate suspicion of Spartan a bit, but there’s something there. Also:
Huh. I’m breaking my word. This is an open question for anyone:In post 549, Spartan117 wrote:fyi I'm not paying attention to you (flow) as whatever alignment you are, you are anti town...
Do you think that flow trap’s play is anti-town? I’m curious where people stand. I don’t think it qualifies/am not convinced that it is, but I think hearing people’s current takes on this would be useful.
To expand on my mindset here Quiet, it was a bit of an emotional reaction of my frustration to asking them question after question and having it dismissed with fog. I can fully understand why someone would want to not give everything away and keep some of their thoughts to themselves. It just got to me that after trying to understand something and put the pieces together it was shut down on more than one occasion, and if I'm not mistaken I think the same happened to others too, and I can see both town and scum doing this for different reasons so I see it as NAI overall but it still stagnates potential discussion that could have been had, shuts off avenues of conversation and makes me at the very least feel less desiring to try and converse with them from fear of getting shot down again and it being a pointless effort to try and go down that avenue although I did try.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Less helpful insinuates some level of helpfulness of which there was none.In post 801, flow trap wrote:Less helpful # hurtful- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
About to go through them pages now, Just wanted to say I didn't say he wasn't ever helpful, I was referring to when I had asked him questions and he was dismissive/illusive. My frustration also stems from not being able to get a strong read on the slot, overall I have a pretty Null real, I can see townie and scummy reasons for the things they have done.In post 808, quiet wrote:Pedit; I recognize that it was a response to Spartian saying you weren’teverhelpful and that it’s unfair of me to snipe it out like that.
More interested in how you play. If this is townYou, it almost seems like you’re playing town in a way that balances your scum range. If that makes sense. Thus the question of how you recommend sorting you; the “am I having fun” thing is a tough read for me- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Doing a recap reviewing Enchants ISO and organically from 27 up to now.
To preface I had a decent town lean on Enchant like I mentioned in 746 from my review of the majority of the beginning of the game, I felt them very interesting with how they engaged whether intentional or not, causing reactions provoking discussion, not trying to hide away and blend into the background. Early game posts gave me that town vibe from them, i felt it more of a hunch from their behaviour and how they interacted with others.
Posts tended to be many but lacking depth and content, choosing to be more concise with their actions whether out of lack of interest for the game or trying to be mysterious.
in 471 he calls EZ out when he places his vote on a weaker scum read and not himself, I know some disagree but I think that is a legitimate read.
478 Was where I found his a bit sus, I didnt really understand his reasoning behind pre-claiming he would hammer anyone put to L-1. I could see some townie motive to it, on again pushing a motive to prevent a lolhammer.
577 he defends himself making a point about his serious and not serious behaviour and it all being read the same, 581 His refusal to review EZs wall isnt helping him and does appear scummy.
In the following posts after he seemed comfortable to egg on players to put their vote on him without seeming too uncomfortable about it more as if it is a challenge.
To preface this next part I can see definite scum motives behind the bizarre actions that Enchant chose to take from here on, but since the vast majority seem to be on the lynch Enchant train and it being scummy to view him as anything other than scum, I wish to play devils advocate and just try and look at things from a well what if enchant is town, perspective and if so what might be going on in Enchants head in this case. With everyone so focused on blanket scum claiming him I want to assess the possibility that it's not a 100% guarantee, because for me its not.
661 The post before the self vote he shares his opinion on Prism and welcomes quiet, not very like someone who wishes to leave the game.
In between that time and 691 where he self votes, he receives a vote from both Flow Trap and EZ. Quiet brings up about the L-1 hammer by Enchant if its still a thing in 686
I'm not sure if Enchant hadn't checked the previous posts and just voted himself as a reaction tester to see who might jump on it. there are 3 minutes after he places the vote on himself before he posts 692 so I personally believe in them 3 minutes he checked after he had placed the self vote and saw the other votes on him.
I know it is probably very unlikely but it could be possible that he thought he self hammered and this was his reaction as the last message to chat before the chat would be locked. and it wasnt until 695 where EZ informed him he didnt self hammer that he then unvoted himself in 696 after EZ jokes about someone coming along to hammer him.
I dont like Quiets 697 In the same post he says"But you weren’t super at risk from my perspective; I thought some of this was pressure"and then follows it up with"So uh, basically, I’m probably going to hammer you later today when I catch up"He goes from in his eyes Enchant not being at risk and seeing some of the votes as pressure to then telling him he is probably going to hammer him, it feels a bit opportunistic in my eyes.
700 comes across to me as genuine town that has given up and doesnt know where to turn as it seems like everyone is scum reading him and he doesn't know what else to do, he follows that up by trying to open dialogue with quiet in 701 open dialogue being the opposite to what he has been accused of doing of trying to end the day early and stopping conversation.
704 After quiet tries to talk him out of self voting he explains why in 704 if he is around long term it will be harmful to town with,
"even if i save myself now, i hardly believe in ability to clean self later, where my death can decide game."
That feels to me as a very townie mindset to have where he is putting the best interests of the town before himself, something that scum wouldn't do.
712 again explaining the rationale for why his self hammer or at the very least death in general would benefit town, why would scum do that?
Personally I feel like Enchants is a provocative player by behaviour who I think has scum on his wagon, and I refuse to join this wagon.
Read through and thoughts are up to page 30 atm, need to go out to the shop right now will continue when I get back.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Why do you want to prevent a Fredrick wagon?In post 734, flow trap wrote:Fredrick yes, but I don't see how it's preventing either when I have★ Unlimited Vote Changes ★- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
What are your thoughts on Sal? I feel like I need to re-evaluate the slot/give it some more thought, I'm also planning a re read of Safebet/quiets slot.In post 753, Prism wrote:Let me know if there's any other reads you want to talk about when you finish reading.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Could you explain your thoughts as to why you are leaning scum?In post 755, flow trap wrote:Ok, I think I'm going to place Salsa in the Leaning Scum but not open to shoot category- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I think hes gone to bed if 881 has anything to say about itIn post 888, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 874, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Salsabil Faria, I trust you to encounter my post where I ask you a question soon. I may or may not be online and may or may not be able to have a real-time talk with you.Okay, I'm waiting for your question...- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Why do you think EZ was picked?In post 1029, flow trap wrote: this happens way too much- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Any specific reason for your hunch, I take it you just have a bit of specific town sus right?In post 1031, flow trap wrote:I think we are in Cop+Doc world- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
At the time yes I was sus of EZ and I had some mild suspicion on Flow trap (generally find them hard to read) who I'm not sure if they was on the Enchants wagon at that exact time but was dancing on or around it. Although I had townread Quiets slot before they subbed in I was also concerned of them being a bit too LAMIST and I had and still have that concern with you too, so I found that whole wagon sus pretty much, I agree what enchant did didn't look very good but it was all too easy for everyone to jump aboard.In post 1035, Prism wrote:Spartan: Who did you think the scum were on the wagon at the time of 838?
I believe at the time you scumread Esoteric but you were voting Frederick, who was offwagon.
What do you think now seeing that slot flip? what do you think of your fellow wagoners? How do you feel their motives compared to your own with that wagon?- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I don't feel like he died in vein, I think now that we know for certain enchant is 100% town it gives us a bit more clarity with our reads on those that interacted with him especially with those on his wagon.In post 1044, quiet wrote:Actually, flow can tell me the NK equity probably.
The enchant flip gives us basically no info as feared.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I understand why Flow Trap may be less likely to get NKed although I still would have thought he would have been one of the contenders, but I dont understand why you are distancing yourself from Prism and Floo. I'm not sure if there is something specific as to why it would be the case but I would have put you in the same pool of NK targets as Prism and Floo, if not above floo for your content and effort to try and solve the game? It' makes me sus that you would try and distance yourself like that hmm.In post 1046, quiet wrote:My immediate thoughts were “should have just townlocked them and moved on, this gives us nothing”.
I don’t think particularly anyone stands out as a paragon of scum for how they interacted with that wagon. It’s basically a policy elim at that point. I couldn’t find a hero fold there, so why should I expect anyone else to have?
I think the NK is our best bet for info, but otherwise my immediate take was, great, day1 part2, electric boogaloo. I’m probably being dismissive and I’m sure that there’s some info to be gained, but right now I’m trying to figure out what two wagons help solve the game most today, and will need to review to see if there’s anyone that benefits from an EZ kill. I retain some townreads I feel good about, and I remember townreading EZ (I hope I did, havnt looked back yet still traveling), so there was a lil disappointment there.
, Fredrick doesn’t, as we had suspicion from yesterday. Spartian falls into that category, but was less sus than us three. I think salsa gets left alive, not over suspicion, but because I think they’re not the scariest town.Flow doesn’t get NKed, I never do
I could see floo getting killed, EZ obviously did and was pretty widely TRed if I recall correctly, Prisim you also do often I think, though you fall into the category of scary as a competent scum threat, and may be left alive for that reason.
I’ll need to review as to why EZ was the choice over floo and you. That is my no review (and possibly fallible memory) reaction. When I’m done traveling I’ll read back over and give stronger reads about my suspicious, but other than a TR on Floo which I wholeheartedly retain, I don’t think there’s any that feel locked for me without looking back.
I’m interested in why the push on Fredrick happened, and why it’s still happening. Trying to decide if it’s a good wagon today. I think I’m inclined to hunt somewhere else, but if other people want to champion that I’ll be very interested.
Fredrick was very uncooperative and didnt act in a townie manner trying to solve the game, pushing players, expressing reads, etc.
I'm not sure who the best wagon is yet, I want to see what everyone has to say about the events of N1.- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Why do you think that Floo, I don't agree.In post 1050, floo wrote:Fredrick is somewhat vindicated by Enchant's town flip- Spartan117
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Spartan117
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: April 7, 2015
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117
- Spartan117